Guantánamo and Illegal Detentions

Similar documents
The Plight of Afghan Prisoners Transferred from Guantánamo and Bagram to Continuing Illegal Detention and Unfair Trials in Afghanistan

New York County Clerk s Index Nos /15 and /16. Court of Appeals STATE OF NEW YORK >>

,..., MEMORANDUM ORDER (January 1!L, 2009)

Safeguarding Equality

ADVANCE UNEDITED VERSION

Boumediene v. Bush: Guantanamo Detainees Right to Habeas Corpus

Lerche: Boumediene v. Bush. Boumediene v. Bush. Justin Lerche, Lynchburg College

From 2002 to 2005 the Bush administration argued that it could

A Different View of the Law: Habeas Corpus During the Lincoln and Bush Presidencies

The US must protect Habeas Corpus

MILITARY COMMISSIONS ACT OF 2006

Boumediene v. Bush: Guantanamo Detainees Right to Habeas Corpus

The Jurisprudence of Justice John Paul Stevens: Leading Opinions on Wartime Detentions

Joint study on global practices in relation to secret detention in the context of countering terrorism. Executive Summary

HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST SUBMISSION TO THE OFFICE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS

Due Process in American Military Tribunals After September 11, 2001

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

International covenant on civil and political rights CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 40 OF THE COVENANT

Background Paper on Geneva Conventions and Persons Held by U.S. Forces

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

INTRODUCTION TO THE 2004 ACLU INTERNATIONAL CIVIL LIBERTIES REPORT. By: Ann Beeson and Paul Hoffman *

CCPR/C/USA/Q/4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. United Nations

UNDERSTANDING THE LAW OF TERRORISM

Testimony Submitted to the European Parliament Subcommittee on Human Rights and Committee on Civil Liberties 28 February 2008

2008] THE SUPREME COURT LEADING CASES 395

Development of international standards for the treatment of prisoners

IN THE DJAMEL AMEZIANE, Prisoner, U.S. Naval Station, Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. Petitioner, UNITED STATES, Defendant.

Opinion adopted by the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention at its sixty-ninth session (22 April-1 May 2014)

CRS Report for Congress

AMBASSADOR THOMAS R. PICKERING DECEMBER 9, 2010 Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties of the House Committee on the

COMMITTEE AGAINST TORTURE AND OTHER CRUEL, INHUMAN OR DEGRADING TREATMENT OR PUNISHMENT. 36 th session, 1-19 May 2006, Geneva

American and International Opinion on the Rights of Terrorism Suspects

RASUL V. BUSH, 124 S. CT (2004)

Habeas Corpus Outside U.S. Territory: Omar v. Geren and Its Effects On Americans Abroad

4/8/2005 2:49 PM CASE COMMENTS

United States: The Bush administration s war on terrorism in the Supreme Court

Jamal Kiyemba v. Barack H. Obama S. Ct. No

Closing the Guantanamo Detention Center: Legal Issues

BELDEN RUSSONELLO & STEWART

Human Rights Council. Protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism

Imprisonment without Trial. The Constitution is a broad charter of governance. It establishes the national

Guantanamo And The Abuse Of Presidential Power PDF

pniieb $infee 0,louri of appeals

The Separation of Powers and 15 Years of Anti- Terrorism Policies Since 9/11

Resettlement of Guantanamo Bay Detainees: Questions and Answers February 2009

Human Rights in General

David Hicks and Guantanamo Bay

Program on the Geopolitical Implications of Globalization and Transnational Security

The US does not condone...

The War Against Terrorism and the Rule of Law

Statement of the Task Force

International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group (ICLMG) Canadian NGO Coalition Shadow Brief

7 Conclusion. Striking the Balance between Civil Liberties and Security. Pursuit of justice through repression of fundamental freedoms in

Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law

KEYNOTE STATEMENT Mr. Ivan Šimonović, Assistant Secretary General for Human Rights. human rights while countering terrorism ********

Detention Operations Policy & the Global War on Terrorism

RESPONDING TO INJUSTICE AN IGNATIAN APPROACH. Guantanamo Bay

Habeas Corpus and the Separation of Powers:

Remarks on the Military Commissions Act

No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES MOATH HAMZA AHMED AL ALWI, PETITIONER BARACK H. OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL.

HABEAS CORPSE: THE GREAT WRIT HIT

Digital Commons at St. Mary's University

Detention of U.S. Persons as Enemy Belligerents

Preventive Detention in the War on Terror: A Comparison of How the United States, Britain, and Israel Detain and Incapacitate Terrorist Suspects

DOES 9/11 JUSTIFY A WAR ON THE JUDICIAL BRANCH? John J. Gibbons *

Case 1:17-cv TSC Document 29 Filed 12/23/17 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Boumediene v. Bush: Flashpoint in the Ongoing Struggle to Determine the Rights of Guantanamo Detainees

Report on the status of British residents held in Guantanamo Bay and the obligation on the UK government to provide them diplomatic support

Dissecting the Guantanamo Trilogy

MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

Damascus Center for Human Rights Studies. UPR Stakeholder Submission - Syria

War on Justice M A Y 0 6. Recommendation to. The United States. The European Union. The United Nations. The Oxford Council on Good Governance

Guantanamo Detention Center: Legislative Activity in the 111 th Congress

WASHINGTON (regional) COVERING: Canada, United States of America, Organization of American States (OAS)

Afghanistan Human rights challenges facing Afghanistan s National and Provincial Assemblies an open letter to candidates

List of issues prior to submission of the fifth periodic report of the United States of America *

General Recommendations of the Special Rapporteur on torture 1

How Not to Promote Democracy and Human Rights. This chapter addresses the policies of the Bush Administration, and the

ISHR S SUMMARIES OF DOCUMENTS FOR THE RESUMED 6 TH SESSION OF THE COUNCIL, DECEMBER

THE INTERROGATION AND DETENTION REFORM ACT OF 2008: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS

Human rights litigation and the war on terror

Closing the Guantanamo Detention Center: Legal Issues

Extraordinary Rendition: The Disregard of Human Life and Human Rights Barb Thomas

Hamad v. Gates and the Continuing Interpretation of Boumediene: A Note on 732 F.3d 990 (9th Cir. 2013)

Guantanamo Detention Center: Legislative Activity in the 111 th Congress

Wartime and the Bill of Rights: The Korematsu Case

Case 1:02-cv CKK Document 491 Filed 03/02/2009 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

In the Supreme Court of the United States

Presidential War Powers The Hamdi, Rasul, and Hamdan Cases

OMAR AHMED KHADR. and

Kenya. Conduct of Security Forces JANUARY 2017

Government Response to the Intelligence and Security Committee s Report on Rendition

Why I Don't Like Ben's Critique of the "Scorecard" By David Remes Posted 9/20/10

Syrian Network for Human Rights -Work Methodology-

A Day in the Life of the Magna Carta. Treacherous, shockingly cruel, cowardly; it seems difficult to find a monarch

AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL NEWS SERVICE 136/93

9 November 2009 Public. Amnesty International. Belarus. Submission to the UN Universal Periodic Review

United States Court of Appeals

UNITED KINGDOM. UK: Human rights under sustained attack in the war on terror

Handout 5.1 Key provisions of international and regional instruments

Transcription:

Guantánamo and Illegal Detentions

The Center for Constitutional Rights The Center for Constitutional Rights is dedicated to advancing and protecting the rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Founded in 1966 by attorneys who represented civil rights movements in the South, CCR is a non-profit legal and educational organization committed to the creative use of law as a positive force for social change. CCR uses litigation proactively to empower poor communities and communities of color; to guarantee the rights of those with the fewest protections and least access to legal resources; and to train the next generation of civil and human rights attorneys. Formed in order to work hand in hand with people s movements, CCR has lent its expertise and support to a wide range of movements for social justice. We are dedicated to defending the right to political dissent, combating the mass incarceration of both citizens and immigrants, and fighting government abuse of power. We strive to complete the unfinished civil rights movement through targeting racial profiling and other modern-day manifestations of racial and economic oppression and through combating discrimination that is based on gender or sexuality. For decades, CCR has pushed U.S. courts to recognize international human rights and humanitarian protections and we have had groundbreaking victories that established the principle of universal jurisdiction in this country and extended human rights standards to abuses committed by corporations and other non-government groups.

Rescue the Constitution: Restore Habeas Corpus The ancient right of habeas corpus requires that anyone who is arrested must be brought before a judge, charged with a crime and have evidence brought forward against them. Created to prevent the King from simply locking up subjects in secret dungeons and throwing away the key, habeas is the most basic of democratic rights. It is the very heart of due process of law. The Military Commissions Act of 2006 (MCA) stripped the right to habeas corpus from anyone detained at Guantánamo Bay as well as for any non-citizen the government detains anywhere, including in the U.S., and labels an enemy combatant. CCR is working to challenge this unprecedented expansion of executive power that has eroded the very foundation of our Constitution. Guantánamo Global Justice Initiative In November 2001, President Bush issued Military Order Number One, which claimed that he could capture, arrest or kidnap and then hold forever, without trial and without the right to challenge their detention in court, any non-citizen that he declared was a terrorist. On January 11, 2002, the first prisoners were brought from Afghanistan to Guantánamo Bay Naval Station in Cuba. One month after these first 20 men arrived, the Center for Constitutional Rights filed the first case on behalf of detainees at Guantánamo, seeking a habeas corpus hearing in which the legitimacy of their detention would be reviewed by the federal courts.

After winning a landmark Supreme Court decision in 2004 establishing that Guantánamo detainees can challenge their detention in federal courts (Rasul v. Bush), CCR organized a network of over 500 pro bono lawyers to file habeas corpus petitions and founded the Guantánamo Global Justice Initiative to coordinate this work. Since that time, we have learned that the vast majority of these men are innocent of any crimes against the United States and have been brutally tortured and abused, both physically and psychologically. We have seen Guantánamo become an international symbol of lawlessness and U.S. arrogance abroad, condemned by international leaders, the United Nations and international human rights organizations. The U.S. government has made every effort to evade judicial review of its detention and interrogation practices at Guantánamo Bay. We continue to fight for humane treatment of detainees and for the closing of the prison camp at Guantánamo. CCR is deeply committed to ensuring that detainees are either charged and given fair trials or released to safe countries. CCR is a leader in the movement to recognize habeas rights for detainees, regardless of where they are held, and to end the use of offshore prisons designed to be outside the reach of law. We work to ban torture and defend the rights of those held at Guantánamo, at Bagram Airbase in Afghanistan, at Abu Ghraib and elsewhere in Iraq, and at secret CIA prisons around the world. The Guantánamo Global Justice Initiative is dedicated to the fight against secrecy and torture; to holding the U.S. government accountable for its illegal actions; and to obtaining justice for victims. Ruhal Ahmed and Shafiq Rasul (two of the Tipton Three ) were held at Guantánamo Bay for two years before being repatriated to the U.K. where they were released without charge. Shafiq Rasul was CCR s client in the landmark Supreme Court case Rasul v. Bush, which held that detainees have the right to challenge their detention in U.S. courts.

Landmark Cases Rasul v. Bush Al Odah v. United States Boumediene v. Bush In February 2002, shortly after the first detainees were sent to Guantánamo, CCR filed the first habeas corpus petition challenging the U.S. government s practice of holding foreign nationals in indefinite detention without charges, trials or counsel. Over the Bush administration s objections, the Supreme Court heard the case, Rasul v. Bush, and in June 2004 ruled that Guantánamo detainees have access to U.S. courts to challenge their detention and treatment while in U.S. custody. Subsequent to this decision, the habeas petitions were sent back to the district court for further proceedings. Immediately after the Supreme Court s decision in Rasul, CCR and cooperating counsel filed eleven new habeas petitions on behalf of more than 70 detainees. These cases eventually became the consolidated cases of Al Odah v. United States and Boumediene v. Bush, which are now the leading cases determining the rights of non-citizens to challenge the legality of their detention while held by the United States, and the constitutionality of the Military Commissions Act of 2006. CIA Ghost Detentions Soon after 9/11, reports began appearing that people were being picked up around the world and held by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). These people were not being held by their own countries intelligence or security services, and they were not being openly held by the U.S. military. Instead, they had become ghosts held in secret prisons unknown to anyone in the outside world. These so-called black sites have been located around the world in Thailand, Afghanistan, Africa, several Eastern European countries, and likely elsewhere. The CIA s secret detention program holds people in secret facilities their detention often unacknowledged, they are barred from communicating with family, legal counsel, or anyone in the outside world. These individuals are victims of enforced disappearance as defined by international human rights law. The CIA also admits to using enhanced interrogation techniques against ghost detainees held in black sites techniques, like waterboarding, that amount to torture. There is no way to know where all of these secret prisons are located or how many people the U.S. is holding in black sites. CCR is committed to shining a light on these clandestine abuses and ending the practice of secret detention wherever it occurs.

www.ccrjustice.org learn more about our work sign up for action alerts become a supporter Image credits: Inside graphic: Owen Henkel, bottom left: AFP/Getty Images