UNDERSTANDING TRADEMARK LAW Third Edition

Similar documents
UNDERSTANDING TRADEMARK LAW Second Edition

Detailed Table of Contents

IC 24-2 ARTICLE 2. TRADEMARKS, TRADE NAMES, AND TRADE SECRETS

THE LAW OF DOMAIN NAMES & TRADE-MARKS ON THE INTERNET Sheldon Burshtein

106TH CONGRESS Report HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COMMUNICATIONS OMNIBUS REFORM ACT OF 1999

Case 1:16-cv FAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/13/2017 Page 1 of 7

Trademark Act of 1946, as Amended

Pakistan. Contributing firm Khursheed Khan & Associates. Author Zulfiqar Khan. World Trade Organisation Agreement and the Paris Convention.

Legal Supplement Part C to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 53, No. 152, 4th December, No. 22 of 2014

Trademark Law. Prof. Madison University of Pittsburgh School of Law

Supported by. A global guide for practitioners

NC General Statutes - Chapter 80 Article 1 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE LOCHIRCO FRUIT AND PRODUCE COMPANY, INC., and THE HAPPY APPLE COMPANY,

Trademark Law. Prof. Madison University of Pittsburgh School of Law

Case 9:13-cv KLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.

Contributing firm Granrut Avocats

TRADE MARKS ACT (CHAPTER 332)

Understanding the Trademark Act of the Republic of Korea

Law on Trademarks and Indications of Geographical Origin

Case 2:18-cv JAD-CWH Document 1 Filed 12/21/18 Page 1 of 17

SUMMARY OF THE SPANISH TRADE MARK LAW

... Revision,

Case 1:13-cv CMA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/30/2013 Page 1 of 17

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :

GIBSON LOWRY BURRIS LLP

Mastercard Int'l Inc. v. Nader Primary Comm., Inc WL , 2004 U.S. DIST. LEXIS 3644 (2004)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

The Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2006: Facilitating Proof of Dilution for Truly Famous Marks. By Brian Darville and Anthony Palumbo

Boston University Journal of Science & Technology Law

Case 0:14-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/27/2014 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Trademarks and the USMCA: Action or Inaction on Trade-Related Trademark Issues?

Law on Trademarks and Geographical Indications

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

REVISED APRIL 26, 2004 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No No TMI INC, Plaintiff-Appellee

France. Contributing firm Granrut Avocats. Authors Richard Milchior Partner Estelle Benattar Associate

Responding to a Cease and Desist Letter for Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition, or Claim of Dilution

Case 2:12-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/10/12 Page 1 of 16

AIPLA TRADEMARK BOOT CAMP June 10, 2011 The EX PARTE Appeal Brian Edward Banner, Esq. i

Title 10: COMMERCE AND TRADE

TRADEMARK OPPOSITIONS IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Law On Trade Marks and Indications of Geographical Origin

3 Tex. Intell. Prop. L.J. 85. Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal Winter, 1995

Puerto Rico. Reichard & Calaf, P.S.C.* San Juan, PR. Last Updated: July

Damages and Remedies in Civil IP Cases An U.S. Perspective

Yearbook 2017/2018. A global guide for practitioners. Greece

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Case 2:08-cv JAM-DAD Document 220 Filed 07/25/12 Page 1 of 21

2. Model Act Provisions The Idaho registration statute adopts the 1992 version of the Model Act. I.C

Trademark Laws: New York

Avery Dennison Corp. v. Sumpton 189 F.3d 868 (9th Cir. 1999)

Case: 4:13-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 08/01/13 Page: 1 of 15 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

CHAPTER 1. DISCLOSING EXPERT WITNESSES UNDER THE FEDERAL RULES: AN OVERVIEW

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:07-cv CM-JPO Document 1 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Venezuela. Contributing firm De Sola Pate & Brown

TABLE OF CONTENTS BINDER 1. Trade-Marks Act Annotated

Yearbook 2019/2020. A global guide for practitioners. Greece

Case 8:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:1

Trademark Litigation A Global Guide. Greece. Ballas, Pelecanos & Associates LPC George Ballas, Nicholas Gregoriades and Maria Spanos

Act 17 Trademarks Act 2010

TRADEMARKS & SERVICE MARKS Annotated Code of Maryland Business Regulation Article, Title 1, Subtitle 4

CHAPTER 315 TRADE MARKS ACT

BASIC FACTS ABOUT REGISTERING A TRADEMARK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT

Case 2:11-cv Document 1 Filed 11/23/11 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case: 1:11-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/10/11 Page 1 of 19 PageID #:1

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #:1

Case 0:10-cv MJD-FLN Document 1 Filed 04/06/10 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Court File No.

Case 1:18-cv RGS Document 1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 2:18-cv JTM-MBN Document 1 Filed 06/04/18 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Act No. 8 of 2015 BILL

THE TRADE MARKS ACT, 1999 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

CZECH REPUBLIC Trademark Act No. 441/2003 Coll. of December 3, 2003 ENTRY INTO FORCE: April 1, 2004

Trade Marks Ordinance (New Version),

LAW OF UKRAINE On the Protection of Rights to Marks for Goods and Services (The translation is not official)

Case 2:09-cv LDG-RJJ Document 1 Filed 11/06/2009 Page 1 of 15

OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF THE PROVISIONAL INSTITUTIONS OF SELF-GOVERNMENT IN KOSOVO / PRISHTINA: YEAR II / NO. 14 / 01 JULY 2007 Law No.

Briefing Paper Trademark Dilution Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc. v. Utah Div. of Travel Development

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

PROVISIONAL INSTITUTIONS OF SELF GOVERNMENT ON TRADEMARKS

Israel. Contributing firm Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer

Trade Dress Rights Enforcement: Prosecuting Infringement Claims

Case 1:16-cv GAO Document 1 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND PARTIES

OUTLINE OF TRADEMARK SYSTEM IN JAPAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

SETTLEMENT & COEXISTENCE AGREEMENTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA CASE NO. OF THE FEDERAL ANTI-. CYBERSQUATTING CONSUMER v. PROTECTION ACT, 15 U.S.C.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

Dilution's (Still) Uncertain Future

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. No. Plaintiff, Defendants.

COALITION PROVISIONAL AUTHORITY ORDER NUMBER 80 AMENDMENT TO THE TRADEMARKS AND DESCRIPTIONS LAW NO. 21 OF 1957

Case: 2:17-cv MHW-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/23/17 Page: 1 of 15 PAGEID #: 1

Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Coalition Provisional Authority Order Number 80

World Trademark Review

WHITE BLACKBIRDS: DEFINING THE EXCEPTIONAL CYBERSQUATTER

The Five (or More) Forums for Your Trademark Dispute, and How to Choose the Right One (Hint: Don t Choose the ITC)

Registration of Trademarks and Service Marks in the USPTO: Why Do It? Ted Davis Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP

Transcription:

UNDERSTANDING TRADEMARK LAW Third Edition

(2016 Pub.3162)

UNDERSTANDING TRADEMARK LAW Third Edition Mary LaFrance IGT Professor of Intellectual Property Law William S. Boyd School of Law University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Copyright 2016 Carolina Academic Press, LLC All Rights Reserved Library of Congress Control Number: 2016941552 ISBN: 978-0-7698-6517-1 Carolina Academic Press, LLC 700 Kent Street Durham, NC 27701 Telephone (919) 489-7486 Fax (919) 493-5668 www.caplaw.com Printed in the United States of America (2016 Pub.3162)

Albert Joseph Leo LaFrance 1913-2015 The islands haven t shifted since last summer, even if I like to pretend they have drifting, in a dreamy sort of way, a little north, a little south, or sidewise and that they re free within the blue frontiers of bay. William Butler Yeats iii

Preface This text offers a broad introduction to the fundamental principles of the law of trademarks and unfair competition. Although deeply rooted in the common law of torts, modern trademark law has branched in many directions, as evidenced by the development of dilution and cybersquatting laws, as well as state and federal registration systems. Practitioners and students of trademark law today must be familiar with all of these branches and their various sources which include statutes as well as common law, and federal as well as state law. Although trademark law has become increasingly federalized since the enactment of the Lanham Act in 1946, the federal law of trademarks and unfair competition has little preemptive effect on state law. As a result, many aspects of trademark and unfair competition law are governed by both state and federal law. The state and federal approaches often converge, and sometimes diverge, but despite the increasing scope of federal trademark and unfair competition law, state law remains important. However, conflict may arise between, on the one hand, the state and federal regimes of trademark and unfair competition law and, on the other hand, the federal regimes of copyright and patent law. An understanding of trademark law, therefore, requires an understanding of its relationship with these other doctrines in particular, which applications of trademark or unfair competition law would so interfere with the congressional schemes of patent and copyright protection that the latter must be given preemptive effect, as illustrated by the denial of trademark protection to functional aspects of trade dress. The law of trademarks and unfair competition constantly evolves in response to changes in commercial markets. For example, the globalization of markets for goods and services has led to the increased internationalization of trademark and unfair competition law. Federal law, for example, now considers certain foreign uses of trademarks in determining priority for federal registration and, conversely, recognizes that certain foreign activities may give rise to infringement claims under the Lanham Act. Federal law has also responded to the explosive growth of the Internet as a means for communication as well as a marketplace for goods and services. Although trademark law has traditionally protected the right of a trademark holder within the specific geographic markets where the mark is in use, such geographic boundaries are less relevant today, as brick-and-mortar locations are supplemented or displaced by Internet commerce. Internet activity can also blur the line between commercial activities subject to trademark regulation and expressive conduct that is protected by the First Amendment. In addition, activities such as keyword advertising and the use of social media raise fundamental questions about the meaning of trademark infringement. For practitioners and students with no background in trademark and unfair competition law, this text may serve as a free-standing introduction. Those who already have some familiarity with these subjects will find the text to be a handy reference tool. Extensive footnoting and citation to authority is provided throughout, in order to assist those desiring to investigate a particular topic in greater depth. v

Table of Contents Chapter 1 NATURE AND PURPOSE OF TRADEMARK PROTECTION.................................. 1 1.01 INTRODUCTION......................................... 1 PART I: HISTORICAL OVERVIEW OF TRADEMARK LAW............ 3 1.02 EARLY COMMON LAW: PASSING OFF....................... 3 1.03 EVOLUTION OF MODERN COMMON LAW AND STATE TRADEMARK STATUTES........................... 4 1.04 EARLY FEDERAL LAW: THE TRADEMARK CASES............. 6 1.05 THE LANHAM ACT...................................... 7 [A] Overview.............................................. 7 [B] Recent Amendments...................................... 8 [1] Dilution Doctrine...................................... 9 [2] Anticybersquatting Provisions............................. 9 PART II: TRADEMARK, COPYRIGHT, AND PATENT LAW COMPARED......................................... 10 1.06 SUBJECT MATTER...................................... 10 1.07 SCOPE OF RIGHTS...................................... 11 1.08 DURATION OF PROTECTION.............................. 12 1.09 GEOGRAPHIC SCOPE OF PROTECTION..................... 13 1.10 SOURCE OF CONGRESSIONAL AUTHORITY................. 14 1.11 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STATE AND FEDERAL LAW........ 14 Chapter 2 SUBJECT MATTER OF TRADEMARK PROTECTION................................. 17 2.01 INTRODUCTION........................................ 17 PART I: NATURE OF TRADEMARKS............................ 17 2.02 TRADEMARKS AS ORIGIN IDENTIFIERS.................... 17 2.03 THE REQUIREMENT OF NONFUNCTIONALITY............... 18 [A] Public Policy.......................................... 18 [B] The Evolving Definition of Functionality...................... 21 [C] Aesthetic Functionality................................... 29 [1] Pre-Qualitex Cases.................................... 30 [2] The Supreme Court on Aesthetic Functionality................. 33 [3] Post-Qualitex Cases.................................... 35 PART II: ESTABLISHING TRADEMARK RIGHTS................... 41 2.04 USE IN TRADE......................................... 41 vii

Table of Contents [A] Establishing Priority of Use................................ 42 [B] Lanham Act........................................... 44 [1] Use in Commerce..................................... 44 [2] Foreign Use......................................... 48 [3] The Famous Marks Doctrine............................. 52 [4] Intent to Use (ITU) Applications........................... 56 [5] Constructive Use...................................... 57 2.05 DISTINCTIVENESS...................................... 57 2.06 MAINTAINING TRADEMARK RIGHTS...................... 58 PART III: TYPES OF TRADEMARKS............................. 59 2.07 PROTECTIBLE MARKS................................... 59 [A] Spectrum of Distinctiveness................................ 59 [1] Arbitrary or Fanciful................................... 61 [2] Suggestive.......................................... 63 [3] Descriptive.......................................... 65 [a] Common Law Proscription............................. 66 [b] Secondary Meaning.................................. 66 [4] Generic Terms....................................... 68 [B] Personal Names........................................ 71 [C] Trade Dress........................................... 74 [D] Color, Sound, Scent..................................... 78 [E] Artistic, Musical, and Other Expressive Works.................. 79 [F] Celebrity Likenesses and Fictional Characters................... 82 [G] Titles of Expressive Works................................ 84 [H] Numbers and Alphanumeric Combinations..................... 84 [I] Foreign Words......................................... 85 [J] Abbreviations of Generic or Descriptive Terms.................. 86 PART IV: FEDERAL TRADEMARK REGISTRATION................. 87 2.08 BENEFITS OF FEDERAL REGISTRATION.................... 87 2.09 MARKS ELIGIBLE FOR FEDERAL REGISTRATION............. 89 [A] General Standard....................................... 89 [B] Marks Ineligible for Registration on the Principal Register.......... 90 [1] Immoral, Deceptive, Scandalous, or Disparaging Matter; False Geographic Indications for Wines and Spirits............. 92 [2] National, State, or Municipal Insignia....................... 95 [3] Name, Portrait, or Signature.............................. 95 [4] Marks Likely to Cause Confusion with Existing Marks........... 96 [a] Priority of Use...................................... 96 [b] Priority through Analogous Use.......................... 96 [c] Factors Indicating Likelihood of Confusion................. 98 viii

Table of Contents [d] Concurrent Use.................................... 100 [5] Descriptive, Misdescriptive, or Functional Marks.............. 103 [a] Merely Descriptive.................................. 103 [b] Deceptively Misdescriptive............................ 103 [c] Primarily Geographically Descriptive..................... 104 [d] Primarily Geographically Deceptively Misdescriptive......... 104 [e] Primarily Merely a Surname........................... 107 [f] Functional Marks................................... 107 [6] Overcoming Bars to Registration Under Section 2(f)............ 109 [7] Dilutive Marks...................................... 110 [C] Certification Marks..................................... 112 [D] Collective Marks...................................... 113 [E] Service Marks........................................ 114 2.10 REGISTRATION PROCESS............................... 115 [A] Use................................................ 115 [B] Intent to Use.......................................... 116 [C] Who May Register a Mark................................ 118 [D] Opposition........................................... 119 [E] Interferences......................................... 120 [F] Concurrent Use Proceedings.............................. 121 [G] Dividing Applications................................... 121 [H] Maintaining and Renewing Registrations..................... 122 [1] Affidavit of Use...................................... 122 [2] Renewal........................................... 123 2.11 JUDICIAL REVIEW..................................... 123 2.12 CANCELLATION....................................... 125 [A] Grounds for Cancellation................................. 125 [B] Procedure............................................ 126 2.13 INCONTESTABILITY................................... 127 [A] Effect of Incontestable Status.............................. 127 [B] Establishing Incontestability.............................. 130 2.14 THE SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER.......................... 130 [A] Eligible Marks........................................ 130 [B] Registration Procedure.................................. 131 [C] Effect of Supplemental Registration......................... 132 [D] Cancellation.......................................... 132 2.15 DOMESTIC PRIORITY BASED ON FOREIGN TRADEMARK REGISTRATIONS...................................... 133 [A] International Agreements................................. 133 [B] National Treatment..................................... 133 [C] Domestic Priority Based on Foreign Registration................ 134 [D] The Madrid Agreement and the Madrid Protocol................ 135 ix

Table of Contents PART V: STATE TRADEMARK REGISTRATION................... 139 2.16 STATE REGISTRATION STATUTES........................ 139 [A] General............................................. 139 PART VI: UNREGISTERED MARKS............................. 139 2.17 PROTECTION OF UNREGISTERED MARKS.................. 139 [A] State Law............................................ 139 [B] Federal Law.......................................... 139 PART VII: RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STATE AND FEDERAL PROTECTION..................................... 140 2.18 GENERAL RULE OF NON-PREEMPTION.................... 140 2.19 CONFLICTS BETWEEN FEDERAL AND STATE TRADEMARK LAW............................... 140 PART VIII: ASSIGNMENTS AND LICENSES...................... 142 2.20 ASSIGNMENTS AND LICENSES........................... 142 [A] Assignments.......................................... 142 [B] Licensing............................................ 144 Chapter 3 TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT AND UNFAIR COMPETITION............................... 145 3.01 INTRODUCTION....................................... 145 PART I: TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT......................... 146 3.02 ELEMENTS OF TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT............... 146 [A] Ownership of a Valid Mark............................... 148 [B] Likelihood of Confusion................................. 150 [1] Overview.......................................... 150 [2] Factors............................................ 152 [a] Similarity of Marks................................. 155 [b] Competitive Proximity............................... 160 [c] Strength of Plaintiff s Mark............................ 162 [d] Consumer Sophistication.............................. 165 [e] Actual Confusion................................... 166 [f] Bridging the Gap................................... 168 [g] Defendant s Good Faith.............................. 169 [h] Relative Quality of Defendant s Goods or Services........... 170 [3] Jurisdictional Variations on the Polaroid Test................ 172 [C] Reverse Confusion..................................... 173 [D] Confusion Before or After the Purchasing Decision.............. 177 [1] Initial Interest Confusion............................... 177 [2] Post-Sale Confusion................................... 186 x

Table of Contents [E] Trademark Use........................................ 190 [1] Keyword-Triggered Advertising.......................... 192 [2] Metatags........................................... 195 [3] Domain Names...................................... 196 [4] Expressive Works.................................... 197 [5] Functional Uses...................................... 197 [F] Use in Commerce as Jurisdictional Predicate................... 198 [G] Territorial Limitations................................... 200 PART II: REVERSE PASSING OFF.............................. 205 3.03 REVERSE PASSING OFF................................. 205 PART III: FEDERAL LAW OF FALSE ADVERTISING............... 210 3.04 FALSE ADVERTISING.................................. 210 PART IV: DILUTION........................................ 218 3.05 THE CONCEPT OF TRADEMARK DILUTION................. 218 3.06 STATE DILUTION LAWS................................ 222 3.07 THE FEDERAL TRADEMARK DILUTION ACT................ 226 [A] History............................................. 226 [B] Elements of a Federal Dilution Claim........................ 226 [C] Trademark Use........................................ 228 [D] Distinctive and Famous Marks............................. 229 [1] Distinctiveness...................................... 229 [2] Fame............................................. 230 [E] Trade Dress and other Nontraditional Marks................... 234 [F] Likelihood of Dilution................................... 234 [1] The FTDA and the Moseley Decision...................... 234 [2] Likelihood of Dilution under the TDRA..................... 236 [a] Likelihood of Dilution by Blurring....................... 236 [b] Likelihood of Dilution by Tarnishment.................... 240 [G] Exceptions........................................... 240 [1] Fair Use........................................... 241 [2] Noncommercial Use.................................. 243 [3] News Reporting and News Commentary.................... 244 [H] Remedies............................................ 245 [I] Effective Date of TDRA................................. 246 [J] Federal Registration as a Dilution Defense.................... 246 PART V: CYBERSQUATTING................................. 247 3.08 ANTICYBERSQUATTING CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT (ACPA).............................................. 247 [A] Elements of a Cybersquatting Claim......................... 248 xi

Table of Contents [B] In Rem Jurisdiction.................................... 252 [C] Personal Names....................................... 256 [D] ACPA Remedies....................................... 257 3.09 ALTERNATIVE FORUMS FOR DOMAIN NAME DISPUTES...... 257 PART VI: SECONDARY LIABILITY............................. 259 3.10 CONTRIBUTORY AND VICARIOUS LIABILITY............... 259 [A] Contributory Liability................................... 259 [B] Vicarious Liability..................................... 267 PART VII: DEFENSES....................................... 270 3.11 FIRST AMENDMENT CONSIDERATIONS.................... 270 [A] Commercial Parodies................................... 271 [1] Infringement and Unfair Competition...................... 272 [2] Dilution........................................... 275 [B] Noncommercial Expression............................... 279 [1] Infringement and Unfair Competition...................... 279 [2] Dilution........................................... 287 [C] Political Speech....................................... 293 [D] Expressive Merchandise................................. 294 3.12 AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES............................... 298 [A] Abandonment......................................... 298 [1] Cessation of Use..................................... 300 [2] Other Causes of Abandonment........................... 302 [a] Naked Licensing................................... 303 [b] Assignment in Gross................................. 305 [B] First Sale Doctrine..................................... 307 [1] Misrepresentation by Non-Authorized Resellers............... 308 [2] Materially Different Goods.............................. 308 [a] Used, Altered, or Refurbished Goods..................... 309 [b] Other Non-Genuine Goods............................ 314 [3] Undisclosed Repackaging............................... 315 [4] Gray Market Goods................................... 316 [C] Laches.............................................. 321 [D] Acquiescence......................................... 325 [E] Unclean Hands........................................ 326 [F] Descriptive Fair Use.................................... 327 [G] Nominative Fair Use.................................... 332 [H] Comparative Advertising................................. 338 [I] Federal Preemption..................................... 339 [J] Eleventh Amendment................................... 345 [K] Statute of Limitations................................... 348 xii

Table of Contents PART VIII: REMEDIES....................................... 348 3.13 NON-MONETARY REMEDIES............................ 348 [A] Injunctions........................................... 348 [B] Seizure of Counterfeit Goods and Related Materials.............. 352 [C] Destruction of Infringing Articles........................... 353 [D] Cancellation of Federal Registration......................... 354 [E] Disclaimers.......................................... 354 3.14 MONETARY AWARDS.................................. 355 [A] Actual Damages, Defendants Profits, and Costs................ 355 [B] Enhanced Damages and Prejudgment Interest.................. 359 [C] Attorney s Fees....................................... 360 [D] Statutory Damages..................................... 361 [E] Enhanced Monetary Awards in Counterfeiting Cases............. 362 [F] The Requirement of Marking or Actual Notice................. 363 [G] Limited Availability of Damages Under Federal Dilution Law...... 364 [H] False or Fraudulent Registration............................ 364 3.15 LIMITATIONS ON REMEDIES AGAINST CERTAIN DEFENDANTS......................................... 365 [A] Makers of Labels, Signs, Packaging, or Advertisements........... 365 [B] Printers and Publishers.................................. 365 [C] Domain Name Registration Authorities....................... 366 [D] The Family Movie Act of 2005............................ 368 [E] Remedies against Federal and State Governments............... 369 3.16 CRIMINAL PENALTIES.................................. 369 [A] Counterfeit Marks...................................... 369 [B] Counterfeit Labels..................................... 371 PART IX: ADJUDICATION.................................... 371 3.17 SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION......................... 371 3.18 STANDING........................................... 373 [A] Standing to Cancel or Oppose Federal Registration.............. 373 [B] Standing under Section 32................................ 375 [C] Standing under Section 43(c).............................. 376 [D] Standing under Section 43(a) and the Common Law of Unfair Competition.......................................... 377 [E] Standing to Bring False Advertising Claims................... 378 3.19 DECLARATORY JUDGMENTS............................ 381 xiii

Table of Contents TABLE OF CASES........................................... TABLE OF STATUTES........................................ TC-1 TS-1 INDEX....................................................... I-1 xiv