DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DATE FILED:21. Case 1:13-cv RMB Document 45 Filed 05/15/13 Page 1 of 6

Similar documents
UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Plaintiff, Plaintiff,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION MARY LOU BENNEK, Derivatively on ) Behalf of THE HOME DEPOT, INC.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA. Case No. CIV M ORDER

Case 4:17-cv YGR Document 19 Filed 04/26/17 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:13-cv DJC Document 44 Filed 12/03/13 Page 1 of 5

E-FILED on 12/11/03 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case 5:04-cv JW Document 20 Filed 06/23/2004 Page 1 of 6 WECHSLER HARWOOD, LLP SCHIFFRIN & BARROWAY, LLP

Page 1 of 13. Case 1: 05-cv-003-LY Document 23 Filed 01/2006 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION OS CV-923

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:13-cv SV Document13 FUec101/22/14 Pagel of 7

Case4:09-cv CW Document42 FUedi 0/07/09 Pagel of 9

Case 1:08-cv EGS Document 19 Filed 12/12/08 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:08-cv LAK Document 78 Filed 01/09/2009 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

U.S. District Court Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:14-cv JPO

Case 3:13-cv BEN-RBB Document 44 Filed 10/24/13 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:05-cv TJW Document 211 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Defendants. Plaintiff, Defendants.

Plaintiff, - against - 09 Civ (DAB) ORDER. Plaintiff, - against - 09 Civ (DAB) ORDER. Plaintiff,

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

considering appointing, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) UNIFORM SCHEDULING ORDER

GENERAL ORDER FOR LUCAS COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION. damages for alleged exposure to asbestos or asbestos-containing products; that many of the

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION. v. Civil Action No. 3:10 cv 00071

Case 2:14-cv JCC Document 16 Filed 05/20/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 2:05-cv TJW Document 212 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 5

CASE 0:15-cv JRT Document 17 Filed 02/12/16 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA INTRODUCTION

Case 3:18-cv DMS-MDD Document 256 Filed 10/09/18 PageID.4031 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 10 Filed 08/28/17 Page 1 of 5 : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

U.S. District Court Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:17-cv VSB

U.S. District Court Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:13-cv ER

Case 4:18-cv JSW Document 18 Filed 12/10/18 Page 1 of 10

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA. vs. Case No: ORDER ESTABLISHING MOTION PRACTICE PROCEDURE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: KATRINA CANAL BREACHES CONSOLIDATED LITIGATION NO.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Class Actions In the U.S.

Case 1:11-cv JPO Document 38 Filed 02/06/12 Page 1 of 9. claim to have suffered damages in connection with purchases of Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd.

Case 2:15-cv LDD Document 54 Filed 12/12/16 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

U.S. District Court Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:14-cv GBD

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Case 3:16-cv CRS-CHL Document 36 Filed 06/29/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 423

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 382 Filed: 03/08/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:7778

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/16/ :58 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 65 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/16/2017. Exhibit D

The New Texas Rule 47 Pleading Rules: What Are They and Why Should I Care?

RULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULE 6:4. PROCEEDINGS BEFORE TRIAL

*(CONSOLIDATED INTO 3951)* Docket Number: TO1 CONTACT CENTERS, INC. Jeffrey J. Reich, Esquire James W Kutz, Esquire VS.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:09-cv RMB Document 16 Filed 03/13/2009 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:14-cv JCC Document 98 Filed 11/24/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 7:15-cv AT-LMS Document 129 Filed 05/04/18 Page 1 of 8

cag Doc#413 Filed 04/02/18 Entered 04/02/18 13:54:23 Main Document Pg 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS [MARSHALL / TYLER / TEXARKANA] DIVISION

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 19 Filed: 06/13/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:901

Case 1:11-cv JEM Document 60 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/22/2011 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:13-cv KBF Document 18 Filed 06/24/13 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

U.S. District Court Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:12-cv AJN

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. ("Denbury" or "Defendant") shares pursuant to the merger of

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

Case 1:15-cv ELR Document 60 Filed 09/08/16 Page 1 of 21

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Docket Number: Philadelphia Suburban Water Company. Keith E. Gabage CLOSED VS. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Department of Transportation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DOCKET CONTROL ORDER STEP ACTION RULE DATE DUE 1

U.S. District Court Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:08-cv PAC

Case 2:07-cv KJD-RJJ Document 95 Filed 02/04/10 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:09-cv NBF Document 586 Filed 10/24/12 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

U.S. District Court Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:10-cv LTS

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/13/ :15 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 38 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/13/2015. Exhibit 1.

Case 1:15-cv YK Document 84 Filed 05/31/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

FORM 4. RULE 26(f) REPORT (PATENT CASES) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 3:16-cv DRH Document 4 Filed 07/05/16 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #39 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

O r SAL. a C (Ei[EDON' CM I. BY u 4 AUG 2007 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Proceedings :

brl Doc 111 Filed 12/17/13 Entered 12/17/13 15:22:56 Main Document Pg 1 of 12

Case: 1:06-cr Document #: 82 Filed: 10/01/08 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:547

Case Doc 635 Filed 10/13/15 Entered 10/13/15 13:45:41 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

1,=-= := usns son~ 1,.!oocume?~t " LEl'TRONICALLY fl.led i!

scc Doc 74 Filed 10/13/17 Entered 10/13/17 14:26:37 Main Document Pg 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:17-cv AT Document 77 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:07-cv RGS Document 24 Filed 03/28/07 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 3:17-cv VAB Document 11 Filed 04/18/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETT S CLASS ACTION JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Case 3:16-md RS Document 72 Filed 06/15/16 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)

Case 1:12-cv NRB Document 12 Filed 08/10/12 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 4:02-cv Document 661 Filed 11/01/2006 Page 1 of 6

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 2

Docket Number: FRANKLIN COVEY CLIENT SALES, INC., a Utah Corporation

Case 1:12-cv NRB Document 6 Filed 07/24/12 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. Case No. 3:16-cv DRH Master Docket In Re: Just For Men Mass Tort Litigation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Transcription:

Case 1:13-cv-00214-RMB Document 45 Filed 05/15/13 Page 1 of 6 Case 1:13-cv-00214-HB Document 19-1 Filed 03/05/13 Page 1 of 6 CHRIS BASNETT, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, HOLDING LIMITED, CAI YOUNGJUN LAMES CRANE and MICHAEL TOUPS, DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DATE FILED:21 Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-00214-HB JUN MA, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, V. HOLDING LIMITED, YONGJUN CAL, LAMES CRANE, AND MICHAEL TOUPS, Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-00229-JPO CHARLIE MUNIZ, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, V. HOLDING LTD., YONGJUN CAI, MICHAEL TOUPS, and JAMES CRANE, Civil Action No. 1:1 3-cv-00278-HB

Case 1:13-cv-00214-RMB Document 45 Filed 05/15/13 Page 2 of 6 Case 1:13-cv-00214-HB Document 19-1 Filed 03/05113 Page 2 of 6 PAUL HOWARD, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, V. HOLDING LIMITED, CAL YONJUN MICHAEL TOUPS and JAMES CRANE, Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-00422-HB ORDER GRANTING THE LPH INVESTOR GROUP'S MOTION FOR (1) CONSOLIDATION, (2) APPOINTMENT AS LEAD PLAINTIFF, AND (3) APPROVAL OF LEAD COUNSEL WHEREAS, a putative class action under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") was filed on January 4, 2013 in the Central District of California; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of Section 21 D(a)(3)(A)(i) of the Exchange Act, on January 4, 2013, first-filed plaintiff David Contreras published notice via GlobeNewswire, a widely circulated national business-oriented wire service, advising class members of the pendency of the action, the claims asserted therein, the purported class period, and their right to move this Court to be appointed lead plaintiff; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 21D of the Exchange Act, any purported class member or members desiring to be appointed lead plaintiff(s) was required to have filed a motion for such appointment on or before March 5, 2013; and WHEREAS, Paul Love, Fabio Benedetto Lupis and Chris Wilson (collectively, the "LPH Investor Group") filed a timely motion to be appointed Lead Plaintiff; and

Case 1:13-cv-00214-RMB Document 45 Filed 05/15/13 Page 3 of 6 Case 1:13-cv-00214-HB Document 19-1 Filed 03105/13 Page 3 of 6 WHEREAS, the LPH Investor Group has the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the Class and otherwise best satisfies the requirements of Section 2 1 D of the Exchange Act and Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 21D(a)(3)(B)(v) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. 78u-4(a)(3)(B)(v), the LPH Investor Group seeks approval of its selection of Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP to serve as Lead Counsel for the Class. AND NOW THIS day of 2013, the Court having considered the Motion of the LPH Investor Group for (1) Consolidation; (2) Appointment as Lead Plaintiff; and (3) Approval of Lead Counsel and all supporting documents, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: CONSOLIDATION 1. The motion of the LPH Investor Group to consolidate the above-captioned actions ("Consolidated Action") is GRANTED. 2. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a), the Consolidated Action is to be consolidated for all purposes, including, without limitation, discovery, pretrial proceedings and trial. 3. Every pleading filed in the Consolidated Action shall bear the following caption: LI Ii]FE1KI ui L. l lore LONGWEI PETROLEUM INVESTMENT HOLDING LIMITED SECURITIES LITIGATION: -----------------------x This Document Relates To: -----------------------x X CA No 1 13-cv-00214-HB CLASS ACTION 4. The file in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-00214-HB shall constitute the master file for every action in the Consolidated Action. When the document being filed pertains to all actions, the phrase "All Actions" shall appear immediately after the phrase "This Document Relates To:"

Case 1:13-cv-00214-RMB Document 45 Filed 05/15/13 Page 4 of 6 Case 1:1 3-cv-0021 4-HB Document 1 9-1 Filed 03/05/13 Page 4 of 6 in the caption. When a pleading applies only to some, but not all, of the actions the document shall list, immediately after the phrase "This Document Relates To:" the docket number for each individual action to which the document applies, along with the last name of the first listed plaintiff in that action. 5. All related actions subsequently tiled in, or transferred to, this District shall be consolidated into the Consolidated Action. This Order shall apply to every such action, absent order of the Court. A party that objects to such consolidation, or to any other provisions of this Order, must file an application for relief from this Order within ten days after the date on which a copy of this Order is mailed to the party's counsel. 6. This Order is entered without prejudice to the rights of any party to apply for severance of any claim or action with good cause shown. I 3!3 1 i W km I 7. The motion of the LPI-I Investor Group to serve as Lead Plaintiff in the Consolidated Action is GRANTED. Pursuant to Section 2 1 D of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. 78u-4(a)(3)(B), the LPH Investor Group is appointed as Lead Plaintiff for the putative Class. LEAD COUNSEL 8. The motion of the LPH Investor Group for approval of its counsel as Lead Counsel is GRANTED. 9. Pursuant to Section 21D of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. 78u-4(a)(3)(B)(v), Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP is approved to serve the Lead Plaintiff and the Class as Lead Counsel. 10. Lead Counsel shall manage the prosecution of the Consolidated Action to avoid duplicative or unproductive activities. Lead Counsel shall be responsible for coordination of all activities and appearances on behalf of the Lead Plaintiff and the Class and for dissemination of 4

Case 1:13-cv-00214-RMB Document 45 Filed 05/15/13 Page 5 of 6 Case 1:13-cv-00214-HB Document 19-1 Filed 03/05/13 Page 5 of 6 all notices and orders. Lead Counsel alone shall speak for Lead Plaintiff and the Class and Lead Counsel is solely responsible for communications between Lead Plaintiff and the Class and the Court. It. Lead Counsel shall have the following duties and responsibilities to perform or delegate as appropriate: a. To direct and execute on behalf of Lead Plaintiff all pleadings and filings with the Court; b. To brief and argue all motions; C. To initiate and conduct discovery, including, without limitation, coordination of discovery with Defendants' counsel, the preparation of written interrogatories, requests for admissions, and requests for production of documents; d. To direct and coordinate the examination of witnesses in depositions; e. To appoint a spokesperson for plaintiffs at pretrial conferences; f. To call and chair meetings of plaintiffs' counsel as appropriate or necessary from time to time; g. To initiate and conduct any settlement negotiations with counsel for Defendants; h. To provide general coordination of the activities of plaintiffs' counsel and to delegate work responsibilities to selected counsel as may be required in such a manner as to lead to the orderly and efficient prosecution of this litigation and to avoid duplication or unproductive effort; i. To consult with and employ experts;

Case 1:13-cv-00214-RMB Document 45 Filed 05/15/13 Page 6 of 6 Case 1:13-cv-00214-HB Document 19-1 Filed 03/05/13 Page 6 of 6 II To receive and review periodic time reports of all attorneys on behalf of plaintiffs, to determine if the time is being spent appropriately for the benefit of plaintiffs, and to determine the allocation of any attorneys' fees; k. To direct all pretrial proceedings, trial preparation, trials and post-trial proceedings; and 1. To perform such other duties as may be required by the case or expressly authorized by further order of this Court. 12. Service of pleadings and other papers by Defendants shall be made upon Lead Counsel, who are authorized and directed to accept service of such pleadings and other papers on behalf of all plaintiffs in the Consolidated Action. 13. Defendants and their counsel may rely upon agreements made with Lead Counsel. Such agreements are binding on all plaintiffs in the Consolidated Action and the Class. 14. Pursuant to Section 21D of the Exchange Act, all parties shall treat all documents, data compilations, and tangible objects that are in his, hers, or its custody or control and that are relevant to the allegations of any related actions as if they were the subject of a continuing request for production of documents from an opposing party under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. I kk - JLjs THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE