Supreme Court of Florida

Similar documents
5. NAME (LAST, FIRST, MI.I.) 6. DOB 8. RACE 10. PRIMARY OFF. DATE 12. PLEA FELONY F.S.# DESCRIPTION OFFENSE POINTS

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

RULE 3.990(a) SENTENCING GUIDELINES SCORESHEET 6.DOB. MO DY YR f--'=~~""'="--10s Ow Ooni 11 DM F. ,, oo. Description:.

f--"''-"--"c..'..-' ,-~,~.d~o~.;--.,----~,,.<'o~c;:.---,~,,.. ~A' C~,----,,,IUGw~E.,,,~.D~E~ '"--,,.;i_i

Supreme Court of Florida

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D

Diverting Low-Risk Offenders From Florida Prisons A Presentation to the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Criminal and Civil Justice

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 228

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

Florida Senate SB 170 By Senator Lynn

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 113

Supreme Court of Florida

Sentencing Chronic Offenders

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2012

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. CASE NO. 5D

Supreme Court of Florida

Introduction. CJEC Estimated Prison Admissions Versus Actual Admissions* Number of Inmate Admissions 3,000 2,702 2,574 2,394 2,639 2,526 2,374

Sentencing Factors that Limit Judicial Discretion and Influence Plea Bargaining

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

4B1.1 GUIDELINES MANUAL November 1, 2014

Supreme Court of Florida

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Supreme Court of Florida

CASE NO. 1D Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Brenda L. Roman, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. CASE NO. 5D02-565

PART H - SPECIFIC OFFENDER CHARACTERISTICS. Introductory Commentary

Diverting Low-Risk Offenders From Florida Prisons

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

CASE NO. 1D Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

A CITIZEN S GUIDE TO STRUCTURED SENTENCING

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

Colorado Legislative Council Staff

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

Select Florida Mandatory Minimum Laws

Supreme Court of Florida

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2008

Supreme Court of Florida

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D CORRECTED RAMONA WATSON,

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D

Supreme Court of Florida

AN ACT. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Ohio:

Supreme Court of Florida

Prosecutorial discretion and plea bargaining: is there a jury trial penalty?

Supreme Court of Florida

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

ll1. THE SENTENCING COMMISSION

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

Bradley R. Bischoff, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Parole Commission, for Amicus Curiae Florida Parole Commission.

Supreme Court of Florida

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

Massachusetts Sentencing Commission Current Statutes Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 211E 1-4 (2018)

Supreme Court of Florida

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC: 4 th DCA CASE NO: 4D STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. SALVATORE BENNETT,

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEN COUNTY, OHIO

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 7035

Effective October 1, 2015

Supreme Court of Florida

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT SENATE BILL Chapter 68, Laws of th Legislature 2005 Regular Session SENTENCING REFORM ACT

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. CASE NO. 5D

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2007 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 1003

Transcription:

Supreme Court of Florida No. SC07-1446 IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.992 CRIMINAL PUNISHMENT CODE SCORESHEETS. PER CURIAM. [January 10, 2008] The Supreme Court Criminal Court Steering Committee (Committee) has filed a petition proposing amendments to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.992. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, 2(a), Fla. Const. The Court, on April 19, 2007, amended rules 3.704 and 3.992 to conform the rules to chapter 2007-2, section 5, Laws of Florida (amending 921.0024(1)(b), Fla. Stat.). See In re Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure Rule 3.704 & Rule 3.992, 957 So. 2d 1160 (Fla. 2007). 1 The Committee has now 1. In chapter 2007-2, section 5, Laws of Florida, as part of the Anti-Murder Act, effective March 12, 2007, the Legislature amended section 921.0024(1)(b), Florida Statutes, to mandate the assessment of community sanction violation points for violations occurring on or after March 12, 2007, of probation and community control by a violent felony offender of special concern as defined in section 948.06, Florida Statutes.

proposed amendments to the Criminal Punishment Code Scoresheets, rules 3.992(a) and 3.992(b), to provide greater clarity in the use of the scoresheets. After considering the Committee s proposals and reviewing the relevant legislation, we adopt the proposed amendments as modified. 2 The amendments shall become effective immediately upon release of this opinion. It is so ordered. LEWIS, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur. NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION, AND IF FILED, DETERMINED. Original Proceeding Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure Honorable O. H. Eaton, Jr., Chair, Criminal Court Steering Committee, Eighteenth Judicial Circuit, Sanford, Florida, for petitioner 2. The modifications are nonsubstantive and technical in nature. - 2 -

APPENDIX RULE 3.992 CRIMINAL PUNISHMENT CODE SCORESHEETS Rule 3.992(a) Criminal Punishment Code Scoresheet 1. DATE OF SENTENCE 2. PREPARER S NAME DC SAO 3. COUNTY 4. SENTENCING JUDGE 5. NAME (LAST, FIRST, MI.I.) 6. DOB 8. RACE B W OTHER 7. DC # 9. GENDER M F 10. PRIMARY OFF. DATE 12. PLEA 11. PRIMARY DOCKET # TRIAL I. PRIMARY OFFENSE: If Qualifier, please check A S C R (A=Attempt, S=Solicitation, C=Conspiracy, R=Reclassification) FELONY F.S.# DESCRIPTION OFFENSE POINTS DEGREE LEVEL / / / / (Level - Points: 1=4, 2=10, 3=16, 4=22, 5=28, 6=36, 7=56, 8=74, 9=92, 10=116) (Level - Points: 1=4, 2=10, 3=16, 4=22, 5=28, 6=36, 7=56, 8=74, 9=92, 10=116) Prior capital felony triples Primary Offense points I. II. ADDITIONAL OFFENSE(S): Supplemental page attached DOCKET# FEL/MM F.S.# OFFENSE QUALIFY COUNTS POINTS TOTAL / / / x = DESCRIPTION / / / X x = DESCRIPTION / / / X x = DESCRIPTION / / / x = DESCRIPTION (Level - Points: 1=4, 2=10, 3=16, 4=22, 5=28, 6=36, 7=56, 8=74, 9=92, 10=116) (Level - Points: M=0.2, 1=0.7, 2=1.2, 3=2.4, 4=3.6, 5=5.4, 6=18, 7=28, 8=37, 9=46, 10=58) Prior capital felony triples Additional Offense points Supplemental page points II. III. VICTIM INJURY: Number Total Number Total 2nd Degree Murder 240 x = Slight 4 x = Death 120 x = Sex Penetration 80 x = Severe 40 x = Sex Contact 40 x = Moderate 18 x = III. IV. PRIOR RECORD: Supplemental page attached FEL/MM F.S.# OFFENSE QUALIFY: DESCRIPTION NUMBER POINTS TOTAL / X = - 3 -

(Level - Points: 1=4, 2=10, 3=16, 4=22, 5=28, 6=36, 7=56, 8=74, 9=92, 10=116) (Level = Points: M=0.2, 1=0.5, 2=0.8, 3=1.6, 4=2.4, 5=3.6, 6=9, 7=14, 8=19, 9=23, 10=29) Supplemental page points IV. Page 1 Subtotal: Effective Date: For offenses committed under the Criminal Punishment Code effective for offenses committed on or after October 1, 1998 and subsequent revisions. - 4 -

NAME (LAST, FIRST, MI) DOCKET # Page 1 Subtotal: V. Legal Status violation = 4 Points Escape Fleeing Failure to appear Supersedeas bond Incarceration Pretrial intervention or diversion program Court imposed or post prison release community supervision resulting in a conviction V. VI. Community Sanction violation before the court for sentencing Probation Community Control Pretrial Intervention or diversion VI. 6 points x each successive violation OR New felony conviction = 12 points x each successive violation OR 12 points x each successive violation for a violent felony offender of special concern OR New felony conviction = 24 points x each successive violation for a violent felony offender of special concern VII. Firearm/Semi-Automatic or Machine Gun = 18 or 25 Points VIII. Prior Serious Felony - 30 Points IX. Enhancements (only if the primary offense qualifies for enhancement) Subtotal Sentence Points VII. VIII. Law Enforcement Protection Drug Trafficking Grand Theft Motor Vehicle Street Gang Domestic Violence (offenses committed on or after 03/12/07) x 1.5 x 2.0 x 2.5 x 1.5 x 1.5 x 1.5 x 1.5 Enhanced Subtotal Sentence Points IX. TOTAL SENTENCE POINTS SENTENCE COMPUTATION Ιtotal sentence points are less than or equal to 44, the lowest permissible sentence is any non-state prison sanction. If total sentence points are greater than 44: minus 28 = x.75 = total sentence points lowest permissible prison sentence in months The maximum sentence is up to the statutory maximum for the primary and any additional offenses as provided in s. 775.082, F.S., unless the lowest permissible sentence under the Code exceeds the statutory maximum. Such sentences may be imposed concurrently or consecutively. If total sentence points are greater than or equal to 363, a life sentence may be imposed. maximum sentence In years TOTAL SENTENCE IMPOSED Years Months Days State Prison Life County Jail Time Served Community Control Probation Modified Please check if sentenced as habitual offender, habitual violent offender, violent career criminal, prison releasee reoffender, or a mandatory minimum applies. Mitigated Departure Plea Bargain Other Reason JUDGE S SIGNATURE - 5 -

Effective Date: For offenses committed under the Criminal Punishment Code effective for offenses committed on or after October 1, 1998, and subsequent revisions. RULE 3.992(b) Supplemental Criminal Punishment Code Scoresheet NAME (LAST, FIRST, MI.I) DOCKET # DATE OF SENTENCE II. ADDITIONAL OFFENSES(S): DOCKET# FEL/MM F.S# OFFENSE QUALIFY COUNTS COUNTS POINTS POINTS TOTAL DESCRIPTION (Level - Points: 1=4, 2=10, 3=16, 4=22, 5=28, 6=36, 7=56, 8=74, 9=92, 10=116) (Level - Points: M=0.2, 1=0.7, 2=1.2, 3=2.4, 4=3.6, 5=5.4, 6=18, 7=28, 8=37, 9=46, 10=58) II. IV. PRIOR RECORD FEL/MM F.S.# OFFENSE QUALIFY: DESCRIPTION NUMBER POINTS TOTAL / X = / X = / X = / X = / X = / X = Level - Points: 1=4, 2=10, 3=16, 4=22, 5=28, 6=36, 7=56, 8=74, 9=92, 10=116) (Level = Points: M=0.2, 1=0.5, 2=0.8, 3=1.6, 4=2.4, 5=3.6, 6=9, 7=14, 8=19, 9=23, 10=29) IV. Legitimate, uncoerced plea bargain. REASONS FOR DEPARTURE - MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES (reasons may be checked here or written on the scoresheet) The defendant was an accomplice to the offense and was a relatively minor participant in the criminal conduct. The capacity of the defendant to appreciate the criminal nature of the conduct or to conform that conduct to the requirements of law was substantially impaired. The defendant requires specialized treatment for a mental disorder that is unrelated to substance abuse or addiction, or for a physical disability, and the defendant is amenable to treatment. The need for payment of restitution to the victim outweighs the need for a prison sentence. The victim was an initiator, willing participant, aggressor, or provoker of the incident. The defendant acted under extreme duress or under the domination of another person. Before the identity of the defendant was determined, the victim was substantially compensated. The defendant cooperated with the State to resolve the current offense or any other offense. The offense was committed in an unsophisticated manner and was an isolated incident for which the defendant has shown remorse. At the time of the offense the defendant was too young to appreciate the consequences of the offense. - 6 -

The defendant is to be sentenced as a youthful offender. Pursuant to 921.0026(3) the defendant s substance abuse or addiction does not justify a downward departure from the lowest permissible sentence. Effective Date: For offenses committed under the Criminal Punishment Code effective for offenses committed on or after October 1, 1998 and subsequent revisions. - 7 -