DEC 1 i1z ) FOR DEFENDANTS DEMURRER TO ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT ) ) Time: 439-pm.3) C.D. Michel -

Similar documents
RIiD 51 PX. Fairfax, Virginia (703) [CONVENIENCE OF DEFENDANTS EMPLOYEES AS WITNESSES]

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF FRESNO 21 TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

Fresno County Superior Court, Case No. 1OCECGO2 116 The Honorable Jeffrey Y. Hamilton, Judge

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

1 The parties to this action, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to. 2 the following:

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

FAX. IN TUE SUPERIOR COURT OF TUE STATE OF caiafornia INANDFORTHLCQLNTYOELOSANELES. EAST l)i$trict

copy 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff CALMAT CO. dba VTJLCAN MATERIALS COMPANY, WESTERN DIVISION 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

i J ;o COURT JOZ I1 F F FREJ 0 C 98ADEPUTY RO1CECGO SJK. cm SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF FRESNO

AS MODIFIED. Attorneys for Plaintiff, STERLING SAVINGS BANK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS, ANDREWS SPORTING GOODS, INC., DBA TURNER S OUTDOORSMAN, AND S.G. DISTRIBUTING, INC.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. Plaintiffs and Appellants, Defendants and Res ondents.

REQUEST FOR PUBLICATION OF OPINION. Andre Torigian v. WT Capital Lender Services Case No. F (Fresno County Superior Court No.

MOTION TO STRIKE OPENING BRIEF; PROPOSED ORDER

Case 2:14-cv WBS-EFB Document 14 Filed 08/07/14 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

PARKER, et al., THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., STIPULATION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF PURSUANT TO RULES OF COURT, RULE 8.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Case 2:18-cv R-AGR Document 7 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:26

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Plaintiff{s),

vs. ) NOTICE OF RULING 14 )

1 Justice, on January 9, A copy of the Proof of Service of Summons is attached hereto. 4 Dated: January 27, 2015 MICHEL & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

in furtherance of and in response to its Tentative Decision dated 1/4/2010 addressing various matters

CON. KEhrlichjmbm.com. ECulleyjmbm.com. 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff CALMAT CO. dba VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY, WESTERN DIVISION 7

TO THE HONORABLE TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, CHIEF JUSTICE, AND TO THE HONORABLE ASSOCIATE JUSTICES OF THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES UNLIMITED JURISDICTION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

)

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAMPLE FORM F NOTICE DESIGNATING RECORD ON APPEAL

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Federal Pro Se Clinic CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Part Description 1 5 pages 2 Proposed Order Proposed Order to Motion for Summary Judgment

STIPULATION FOR JOINT APPENDIX. KAMALA D. HARRIs Attorney General of California. DOUGLAS J. WOODS Senior Assistant Attorney General

This matter came on regularly before this Court for hearings on October 7,2004 and on April

the unverified First Amended Complaint (the Complaint ) of plaintiffs MIKE SPITZER and

Case 2:09-cv DOC-RZ Document 72 Filed 08/31/10 Page 1 of 37 Page ID #:992

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:12-cv PSG-RZ Document 1 Filed 10/10/12 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT GRANTING PEREMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE

Benjamin v. Google Inc. Doc. 45

RESPOND TO ORANGE COUNTY OFFICE. March 3, 2011

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Gk) AUo Superior Court of California CountY of Los Angeles. Sherri R. Carter, xecutive ofricer/clerk Deputv

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER ANSWERING A BREACH OF CONTRACT COMPLAINT

Jonathan Arvizu v. City of Pasadena Request for Publication Second District Case No.: B Superior Court Case No.: BC550929

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Request for Publication

) DEFENDANT SAN GABRIEL VALLEY ) PORTIONS OF COMPLAINT. ) Trial Date: None

Case 2:07-cv TJH-CT Document 56 Filed 11/29/2007 Page 1 of 6

Case 3:08-cv BEN-BLM Document 3 Filed 06/17/2008 Page 1 of 2

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:00-cv GAF-RC Document 435 Filed 05/14/13 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:1893

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF ON IMPACT OF CITY'S AMENDMENT TO THE ORDINANCE AT ISSUE IN PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

CLAIM FOR MONEY OR DAMAGES r\eceiyeu WARNING liodesto CITY CLERK Be sure your claim is filed with the' -.. ment Code Section 910 et seq)

HAROLD P. STURGEON, Plaintiff and Petitioner, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants and Respondents, and

TAKE ACTION NOW TO PROTECT YOUR INTERESTS!

Case 2:14-cv GW-AS Document 6 Filed 07/07/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:389

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES NORTH CENTRAL DISTRICT (GLENDALE) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO DIVISION } } } } } } } } } } } } } } /

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION 2. CALGUNS FOUNDATION INC., et al v. COUNTY OF SAN MATEO

Case 5:12-cv EJD Document 1134 Filed 01/27/16 Page 1 of 8

555 Capitol Mall, Suite 1200 Sacramento, California tel fax

Case 3:13-cv EMC Document 736 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF KERN, NORTH KERN DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER

December 10, Cohen v. DIRECTV, No. S177734

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

Case3:11-cv WHA Document33 Filed01/06/12 Page1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Plaintiffs,

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. CINDY LEE GARCIA, an individual, Case No. CV MWF (VBKx) Plaintiff,

Attorneys for Defendant and Respondent CITY OF ANAHEIM SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

LODGED. MHY p CLERK, QS DISTRICT COL VIRAL DISTRICT OF CA i, F,, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNI A

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 424 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 1 of 5

2 STEPAN A. HAYTAYAN. 1 KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California

OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY ROCKARD J. DELGADILLO CITY ATTORNEY REPORT RE: COURT RULING

Complaint Filed: September 2, 2016 Trial Date: None Set. Case 2:16-cv SB Document 9 Filed 12/30/16 Page 1 of 7

a. Name of person served:

TO BE FILED IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

IIAR CONN )14)R1) toliv

nee eaven JAN 0 5%018 SAN MATEO COUNTY Joanna Ghosh (SBN

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

1 BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP EXEMPT FROM FILING FEES ERIC L. GARNER, Bar No

23 vs. UtiliuiÍLi:xl Civil Case. 2 NANCY BAl~RON Bar No R

F ADV.NOTICE.LODGMENT

Case 2:13-bk ER Doc 245 Filed 03/12/15 Entered 03/12/15 14:35:11 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

August 3, Re: Request for Publication of Jacobs v. Coldwell Banker B (July 25, 2017)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

B CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE. LINDA DE ROGATIS, et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,

DISTRICT COURT, FAMILY DIVISION CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA

By S. Lee, Deputy Clerk

Transcription:

1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 C.D. Michel - S.B.N. 1448 TRUTANICH MICHEL, LLP Port of Los Angeles 407 North Harbor Boulevard San Pedro, California 90731 (310) 548-0410 Stephen P. Haibrook LAW OFFICES OF STEPHEN P. HALBROOK 10560 Main Street., Suite 404 Fairfax, Virginia 0 (703) 35-76 Don B. Kates - BENENSON & KATES S.B.N. 039193 8 North East 9 th Avenue Battleground, Washington 98604 (360) 666-88 DEC 1 i1z ENQ COUNTY RQR COURT 11 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 13 14 15 18 19 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FRESNO EDWARD W. HUNT, in his official ) CASE NO. 01CECG0318 capacity as District Attorney of Fresno ) County, and in his personal capacity as a ) JOINT STIPULATION AND PLAINTIFFS citizen and taxpayer, et. al., ) MOTION TO: ) Plaintiffs, ) 1) MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE; ) ) EXCEED PAGE LIMITATION; v. ) 3) SET 1:30 P.M. HEARING STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et. al., Defendants. ) FOR DEFENDANTS DEMURRER TO ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT ) Date: January, 03 ) Time: 439-pm.3) 3O Dept.:.9& 7L WHEREAS, the parties believe that the multiple allegations in plaintiffs First Amended Complaint and multiple demurrer arguments may require extended briefing by the parties on defendants Demurrer, plaintiffs wish to avail themselves of additional time to prepare these briefs, and wish to give the Court extra time to review the materials prior to hearing the Demurrer. THEREFORE, PLAINTIFFS MOVE, AND IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BETWEEN THE PARTIES (by and through plaintiffs attorney of record, C.D. Michel, and defendants attorney of record, Douglas J. Woods of the California Attorney General s Office) as 1 Stipulation to Modify Filing Schedule

1 follows, subject to the Court s approval: 1. The Demurrer will be filed and served via overnight mail on or before Friday, 3 December 6, 0. The memorandum in support of the Demurrer shall not exceed pages. 4. Any Opposition to defendants Demurrer will be filed and served via overnight mail on 5 or before Monday, January 9, 03. It shall not exceed pages. 6 3. Any Reply to the Opposition to Demurrer will be filed and served via overnight mail on 7 or before Thursday, January, 03 and shall not exceed 15 pages. 8 4. The hearing date for this motion is currently reserved with the court for Thursday, 9 January, 03 at& a.m. in Department 98 of the above referenced court. For the traveling k 10 convenience of the parties, the matter will be heard at 1.3O-p.m. 11 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Date: I I (i /oz_ TRUTANICH MICHEL, LLP: 15 18 Date: Attorneys for Plaintiffs OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 19 Douglas J. Woods IT IS SO ORDERED. Attorneys for Defendants Date: jj/o 3 c STEPHEN J. NE HON. TUDGE STEPHEN J. KANE Stipulation to Modify Filing Schedule

/03/Q0 14:50 FAX 9 3 4483 Att Gen Offlce lsth Fir 1003 MOY. t3q 11:04AM TRIJTAMICH1XCHEL,LLP 310 548-4813 I follows, subject to the Court s approval: 1. The Demurrer will be filed and served via oveiniglat mail on or befo re Friday, 3 December 6, 0. The memorandum in support of the Demurrer shall not exceed pages. 4. Any Opposition to defendants Demurrer will he filed and served via overnight mail on $ or before Monday, January 9, 03. It shall not exceed pages. 6 3. Any Reply to the Opposition to Demurrer will be filed and served via overnight mail on 7 or before Thursday, January, 03 and shall not exceed 15 pages. 8 4. The hearing date for this motion is currently ieerved with the court forthursday, 9 January, 03 ai8 in Depaflmnent9* of the above referenced court. For the traveling 10 convenience of the parties, the matter will be heard at433-m. Ii IT IS SO STIPULATED. Date: TRUT.ANICH MICHEL, LLP: is C. D. Michel Atthrnys for Plaintiffs Date; OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IT IS SO ORDERED. Attorncy or Def dants Date; HOl. IUDGE STEPHEN J. KA StiDulation th 4rn1f

1 PROOF OF SERVICE STATE OF CAIJFORNL& 3 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 4 I, Haydee Villegas, am employed in the City of San Pedro, Los Angeles County, California. I am over the age eighteen (18) years and am not a party to the within action. My 5 business address is 407 North Harbor Boulevard, San Pedro, California 90731. 6 On December 3, 0, I served the foregoing document(s) described as 7 JOINT STIPULATION AND PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO: 1) MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE; ) EXCEED PAGE LIMITATION; 3) SET 1:30 P.M. HEARING 8 FOR DEFENDANT S DEMURRER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 9 on the interested parties in this action by placing []the original 10 [X] a true and correct copy 11 thereof enclosed in sealed envelope(s) addressed as follows: Douglas J. Woods Office of the Attorney General 1300 I Street 13 Sacramento, CA 95814 14 (9) 3-5567 (BY MAIL) As follows: I am readily familiar with the firm s practice of collection and 15 processing correspondence for mailing. Under the practice it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at San Pedro, California, in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing an affidavit. 18 Executed on December 3, 0, at San Pedro, California. 19 (PERSONAL SERVICE) I caused such envelope to delivered by hand to the offices of the addressee. Executed on December 3, 0, at San Pedro, California. (STATE) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. (FEDERAL) I declare that I am employed in the office of this court at whose direction the service was made. 3 Stipulation to Modify Filing Schedule

1 C.D.Michel-S.B.N.1448 U TRUTANICH MICHEL, LLP Port of Los Angeles 407 North Harbor Boulevard 3 San Pedro, California 90731 4 (310)548-0410 Stephen P. Haibrook 5 LAW OFFICES OF STEPHEN P. HALBROOK 10560 Main Street., Suite 404 6 Fairfax, Virginia 0 7 10 (703) 35-76 Don B. Kates - S.B.N. 039193 8 BENF,NSON&KATES 8 North East 9 th Avenue 9 Battleground, Washington 98604 (360) 666-88 11 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 13 14 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AN]) FOR THE COUNTY OF FRESNO EDWARD W. HUNT, in his official ) CASE NO. O1CECGO3 18 15 capacity as District Attorney of Fresno ) County, and in his personal capacity as a ) JOINT STIPULATION AND PLAINTIFFS citizen and taxpayer, et. al., ) MOTION TO: Plaintiffs, ) 1) MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE; ) ) ) EXCEED PAGE LIMITATION; 18 v. ) 3) SET 1:30 P.M. HEARING ) FOR DEFENDANTS DEMURRER TO 19 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et. al., ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendants. ) Date: January, 03 ) ) Time: -1O p.m. Dept.: 48k- WHEREAS, the parties believe that the multiple allegations in plaintiffs First Amended Complaint and multiple demurrer arguments may require extended briefing by the parties on defendants Demurrer, plaintiffs wish to avail themselves of additional time to prepare these briefs, and wish to give the Court extra time to review the materials prior to hearing the Demurrer. THEREFORE, PLAINTIFFS MOVE, AND IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BETWEEN THE PARTIES (by and through plaintiffs attorney of record, C.D. Michel, and defendants attorney of record, Douglas J. Woods of the California Attorney General s Office) as 1 Stioulation to Mo fvfilincr rhpdii1i

1 follows, subject to the Court s approval: 1. The Demurrer will be filed and served via overnight mail on or before Friday, 3 December 6, 0. The memorandum in support of the Demurrer shall not exceed pages. 4. Any Opposition to defendants Demurrer will be filed and served via overnight mail on 5 or before Monday, January 9, 03. It shall not exceed pages. 6 3. Any Reply to the Opposition to Demurrer will be filed and served via overnight mail on 7 or before Thursday, January, 03 and shall not exceed 15 pages. 8 4. The hearing date for this motion is currently reserved with the court for Thursday, 9 January, 03 at g44j4m. in Department of the above referenced court. For the traveling 10 convenience of the parties, the matter will be heard at :1E) p.m. 11 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Date: I I (i/- TRUTANICH MICHEL, LLP: 18 Date: Attorneys for Plaintiffs OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 19 Douglas J. Woods Attorneys for Defendants IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: /A/ô Stipulation to Modify Filing Schedule STEPHEN J, KANE HON. JUDGE STEPHEN J. KAI E

13/03/Q0 14:50 FAX 918 3 4483 Att Gen Offlce-l6th Fir ooa MOV Q 11:04AM TJTAMICH-MXCHEL,LLP 310-S48-4B13 p.3 1 follows, subject to the Court s approval: 1. The Demurrer will, be filed and served via overnight mail on or before Friday, 3 December 6, 0. The memorandum in support of the Demurrer shall not exceed pages. 4. Any Opposition to defendants Demurrer will li,c filed and served via overnigituiall on 5 or before Monday, January 9, 03. it shall not exceed i pages. 6 3. Any Reply to the Opposition to Demurrer will be filed and served via overnight mail on 7 or before Thursday, January, 03 and shall not exceed 15 pages. 8 4. The hearing date for this motion, is currently re erved with the court forthursday, :) ic 9 January, 03 a 3G thtn. in Departrnent4-A of the above referenced court. For the traveling 10 conveniencie of the parties, the matter will be heard at4-.m. 11 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 1O TRUT.ANICB MICHEL, LLP: Date: t L/C / is C. U. Michel AtIornys for Plaintiffs Date: OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IT IS SO ORDERED. Attomy ox Def dants Date; HOll. D3E SThPHEN 3. KANE a,... A.. 1 r.. -

1 PROOF OF SERVICE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 3 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 4 I, Haydee Villegas, am employed in the City of San Pedro, Los Angeles County, California. I am over the age eighteen (18) years and am not a party to the within action. My 5 business address is 407 North Harbor Boulevard, San Pedro, California 90731. 6 On December 3, 0, I served the foregoing document(s) described as 7 JOINT STIPULATION AND PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO: 1) MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE; ) EXCEED PAGE LIMITATION; 3) SET 1:30 P.M. HEARING 8 FOR DEFENDANT S DEMURRER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 9 on the interested parties in this action by placing []the original 10 [X] a true and correct copy thereof enclosed in sealed envelope(s) addressed as follows: 11 Douglas J. Woods Office of the Attorney General 1300 I Street 13 Sacramento, CA 95814 (9) 3-5567 14 X (BY MAIL) As follows: I am readily familiar with the firm s practice of collection and 15 processing correspondence for mailing. Under the practice it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at San Pedro, California, in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing an affidavit. 18 Executed on December 3, 0, at San Pedro, California. 19 (PERSONAL SERVICE) I caused such envelope to delivered by hand to the offices of the addressee. Executed on December 3, 0, at San Pedro, California.. (STATE) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. (FEDERAL) I declare that I am employed in the office of this court at whose direction the service was made. 3 Stimu1tinn fri MncfifvFilincr Sr}iMii1