ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF SEPTEMBER 19, 1995

Similar documents
ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF DECEMBER 1, 1994

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF NOVEMBER 27, 2002

BLAKE CASE INTERPRETATION OF JUDGMENT ON REPARATIONS (ARTICLE 67 AMERICAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS) JUDGMENT OF OCTOBER 1, 1999

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF JANUARY 29, 1999

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF DECEMBER 1, 2003

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF MAY 26, 2001

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF AUGUST 12, 2000 CLEMENTE TEHERÁN ET AL. CASE *

Inter-American Court of Human Rights Mauricio Herrera Ulloa and Fernan Vargas Rohrmoser v. Costa Rica

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF AUGUST 29, 1998

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF NOVEMBER 27, 2002

Inter-American Court of Human Rights Mayagna (Sumo) Awas Tingni Community v. Nicaragua

Your use of this document constitutes your consent to the Terms and Conditions found at

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF NOVEMBER 12, 2000

Your use of this document constitutes your consent to the Terms and Conditions found at

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF NOVEMBER 30, 2001

Your use of this document constitutes your consent to the Terms and Conditions found at

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF DECEMBER 2, 2003 * PROVISIONAL MEASURES LUIS UZCÁTEGUI IN THE MATTER OF VENEZUELA

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF FEBRUARY 21, 2003 PROVISIONAL MEASURES LILIANA ORTEGA ET AL. V. VENEZUELA

WorldCourtsTM. In the Barrios Altos Case,

Inter-American Court of Human Rights Mauricio Herrera Ulloa and Fernan Vargas Rohrmoser v. Costa Rica

INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS MAQUEDA CASE RESOLUTION OF JANUARY 17, 1995

Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Case of Durand and Ugarte v. Peru. Judgment of December 3, 2001 (Reparations and Costs)

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF SEPTEMBER 22, 2006 PROVISIONAL MEASURES REGARDING PERU MATTER OF THE GÓMEZ-PAQUIYAURI BROTHERS

Your use of this document constitutes your consent to the Terms and Conditions found at

Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Case of the Mayagna (Sumo) Awas Tingni Community v. Nicaragua

Your use of this document constitutes your consent to the Terms and Conditions found at

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF MAY 7, 2004 CASE OF GÓMEZ-PAQUIYAURI BROTHERS V. PERU PROVISIONAL MEASURES

Suárez Rosero v. Ecuador

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF AUGUST 1, 1991

Case of Trujillo-Oroza v. Bolivia. Judgment of January 26, 2000 (Merits)

Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Case of Blake v. Guatemala. Judgment of January 24, 1998 (Merits)

Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Case of Genie-Lacayo v. Nicaragua. Judgment of January 27, 1995 (Preliminary Objections)

Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Case of El Amparo v. Venezuela. Judgment of January 18, 1995 (Merits)

Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of November 26, Provisional Measures regarding Guatemala

ANNUAL REPORT OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Case of Cesti-Hurtado v. Peru. Judgment of January 26, 1999 (Preliminary Objections)

Your use of this document constitutes your consent to the Terms and Conditions found at

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF NOVEMBER 27, 2003 HILAIRE, CONSTANTINE AND BENJAMIN ET AL. * V. TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CASE

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS * OF JULY 4, 2006

Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Case of Loayza-Tamayo v. Peru. Judgment of January 31, 1996 (Preliminary objections)

Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Judgment of September 1, 2001 (Preliminary Objections)

INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS ADVISORY OPINION OC-19/05. Present:

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF JUNE 28, 2012 PROVISIONAL MEASURES REGARDING HONDURAS MATTER OF GLADYS LANZA OCHOA

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF SEPTEMBER 22, 2006 CASE OF HUILCA-TECSE V. PERU MONITORING COMPLIANCE WITH JUDGMENT

Your use of this document constitutes your consent to the Terms and Conditions found at

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF MARCH 30, 2006 *

Your use of this document constitutes your consent to the Terms and Conditions found at

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF FEBRUARY 29, 2012 REQUEST FOR PROVISIONAL MEASURES. CASE OF DE LA CRUZ FLORES v.

Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. of December 2, 2008

TABLE OF CONTENTS I. ORIGIN, STRUCTURE AND JURISDICTION OF THE COURT A. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE COURT B. ORGANIZATION OF THE COURT...

Cantos v. Argentina ABSTRACT 1 I. FACTS

Your use of this document constitutes your consent to the Terms and Conditions found at

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2013

INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS ADVISORY OPINION OC-13/93 OF JULY 16, 1993

Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Judgment of September 1, 2001 (Preliminary Objections)

Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Judgment of September 1, 2001 (Preliminary Objections)

Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of July 10, 2007 Case of Bámaca Velásquez v. Guatemala (Monitoring Compliance with Judgment)

Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Case of Genie-Lacayo v. Nicaragua

Your use of this document constitutes your consent to the Terms and Conditions found at

Order of the. Inter-American Court of Human Rights * of July 6, Case of Cantos v. Argentina

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF AUGUST 22, 2013 PROVISIONAL MEASURES WITH REGARD TO THE REPUBLIC OF PERU MATTER OF WONG HO WING

Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Case of Baena-Ricardo et al. v. Panama. Judgment of November 28, 2003 (Competence)

ORDER OF THE THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS * OF SEPTEMBER 22, 2006 CASE OF FERMÍN RAMÍREZ V. GUATEMALA COMPLIANCE WITH JUDGMENT

Mayagna (Sumo) Awas Tingni Community v. Nicaragua

Your use of this document constitutes your consent to the Terms and Conditions found at

Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Case of Suárez-Rosero v. Ecuador. Judgment of November 12, 1997 (Merits)

Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Case of El Amparo v. Venezuela

WorldCourtsTM I. SUMMARY

4. The Order of the Inter-American Court August 5, 2008, through which, inter alia, the Court decided:

Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Case of Castillo Petruzzi et al. v. Peru. Judgment of May 30, 1999 (Merits, Reparations and Costs)

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF SEPTEMBER 22, 2006 CASE OF TIBI V. ECUADOR MONITORING COMPLIANCE WITH JUDGMENT

WorldCourtsTM. In the Constantine et al. case,

Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of May 3, 2008 Provisional Measures with regard to Colombia Case of the Mapiripán Massacre

ORDER OF THE ACTING PRESIDENT OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS* MARCH 24, 2010.

Your use of this document constitutes your consent to the Terms and Conditions found at

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF OCTOBER 11, 2000

Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of May 3, 2008 Provisional Measures with regard to Peru Case of the Gómez-Paquiyauri Brothers

Decided by: Dated: 19 June 1998 Citation: Clemente Teheran v. Colombia, Order (IACtHR, 19 Jun. 1998)

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF SEPTEMBER 22, 2006

Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Case of Acevedo-Jaramillo et al. v. Peru

Your use of this document constitutes your consent to the Terms and Conditions found at

Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Case of Neira-Alegría et al. v. Peru. Judgment of September 19, 1996 (Reparations and Costs)

ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES

Your use of this document constitutes your consent to the Terms and Conditions found at

INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS THE LAST TEMPTATION OF CHRIST CASE (OLMEDO BUSTOS ET AL. VS. CHILE) JUDGMENT OF FEBRUARY 5, 2001

Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Case of the Serrano-Cruz Sisters v. El Salvador. Judgment of November 23, 2004 (Preliminary Objections)

Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of July 1, 2009 Case of the Plan de Sánchez Massacre v. Guatemala

INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS NEIRA ALEGRIA ET AL. CASE PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS JUDGMENT OF DECEMBER 11, 1991

Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Case of the Mapiripán Massacre v. Colombia. Judgment of March 7, 2005 (Preliminary Objections)

Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Case of the White Van (Paniagua-Morales et al.) v. Guatemala. Judgment of March (Merits)

Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Case of Cantoral-Benavides v. Peru. Judgment of December 3, 2001 (Reparations and Costs)

Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights * of January 22, 2009 Case of Blake v. Guatemala

Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Case of Escher et al. v. Brazil. Judgment of November 20, 2009

RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights * of February 4, 2010 Case of Cesti-Hurtado v. Peru

Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of May 3, 2008 Case of the Gómez Paquiyauri Brothers v. Peru

Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Case of Molina-Theissen v. Guatemala. Judgment of May 4, 2004 (Merits)

RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE INTER AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. November 16 to 28, PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS. Article 1.

Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of May 02, 2008 Provisional Measures with regard to Brazil Matter of Urso Branco Prison

3. The legal grounds upon which the Commission requests for provisional measures, including the following:

Transcription:

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF SEPTEMBER 19, 1995 PROVISIONAL MEASURES REQUESTED BY THE INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE MATTER OF THE REPUBLIC OF GUATEMALA CARPIO NICOLLE CASE The Inter-American Court of Human Rights, composed of the following judges: also present: Héctor Fix-Zamudio, President Hernán Salgado-Pesantes, Vice President Alejandro Montiel-Argüello, Judge Máximo Pacheco-Gómez, Judge Oliver Jackman, Judge Alirio Abreu-Burelli, Judge Antônio A. Cançado Trindade, Judge; Manuel E. Ventura-Robles, Secretary, and Ana María Reina, Deputy Secretary delivers the following Order: 1. On June 1, 1995 the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (hereinafter "the Commission" or the "Inter-American Commission") submitted to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter "the Court" or "the Inter- American Court") a resolution adopted that same day concerning the Carpio Nicolle Case (Nº 11.333), which was being heard by the Commission. In that resolution the Commission requested that the Court order the provisional measures necessary to protect the life and physical integrity of five persons, family members of Mr. Carpio- Nicolle and officials, who through their work, have had some relation with the investigation of his death. 2. By means of the authority conferred by Article 24(4) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court (hereinafter "the Rules of Procedure"), the President of the Court (hereinafter "the President") issued an Order of June 4, 1995 in which he decided: 1. To request that the Government of the Republic of Guatemala adopt without delay all necessary measures to effectively ensure the protection of the lives and personal integrity of the following persons: MARTA ELENA ARRIVILLAGA DE CARPIO, KAREN FISCHER DE CARPIO, MARIO LÓPEZ-ARRIVILLAGA, ÁNGEL ISIDRO GIRÓN- GIRÓN, and ABRAHAM MÉNDEZ-GARCÍA, and to investigate the threats and harassment of the persons named and to punish those responsible. 2. To request that the Government of the Republic of Guatemala adopt all necessary measures so that witnesses to the Carpio Case can testify, and so that the prosecutor in the case, Abraham Méndez-García, can fulfill his duties without pressure or

2 reprisals. 3. To request that the Government of the Republic of Guatemala inform the military authorities of the Military Zone to which the Civil Defense Committees of San Pedro Jocopilas answer, to instruct these Committees to refrain from taking any actions that would put the lives or personal integrity of the individuals named at risk. 4. To request that the Government of the Republic of Guatemala submit a report to the President of the Court every 30 days from the date of this Order, on the measures taken pursuant to this Order, so as to bring the information to the attention of the Court. 5. To instruct the Secretariat of the Court to transmit the reports presented by the Government of the Republic of Guatemala to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights without delay, which shall then present its observations not later than fifteen days after receipt of the pertinent information. 6. To submit this Order for the Court's consideration and pertinent effects during its next regular session and, if it deems it appropriate, to hold a public hearing on this matter during that same period. 3. On June 30, 1995, the President decided to summon the Government of the Republic of Guatemala (hereinafter "the Government" or "Guatemala") and the Inter-American Commission to appear at a public hearing on September 16, 1995 so that the Court could hear the parties' respective viewpoints, before making a decision on the Commission's request. 4. On July 20, 1995, the Commission submitted to the Inter-American Court a request for expansion of the measures, ordered by the President on June 4 of this same year, to include Mrs. Lorraine Maric Fischer-Pivaral, sister of Mrs. Karen Fischer de Carpio. On July 26, 1995 the President issued an Order in which he decided: 1. To request that the Government of the Republic of Guatemala expand the urgent measures set forth in the Order of the President of June 4, 1995, to include Mrs. Lorraine Maric Fischer-Pivaral and to request that the Government investigate and punish those responsible for the events denounced by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. 2. To request that the Republic of Guatemala comply with the submission of the first report, as ordered in resolutory part 4 of the June 4, 1995 Order of the President, and include Mrs. Lorraine Maric Fischer-Pivaral in subsequent reports which must be submitted within the time-limits set in said Order. 5. On August 1, 1995, Guatemala submitted to the Inter-American Court a copy of its first report dated June 27, 1995, in which it enumerated the precautionary measures taken in response to the Inter-American Commission's request dated October 24, 1994 regarding the family members and other persons connected to the Carpio Nicolle Case. In that report it affirmed that on November 23, 1994 the Headquarters of the National Police ordered that the necessary security measures be provided to said persons. These measures were extended, at the request of the Commission, to the Prosecutor of the Justice Department, Mr. Abraham Méndez- García, who is in charge of the investigation in the case of Mr. Carpio-Nicolle's death. That same day, the Court transmitted the report to the Commission so that it could make any comments it considered relevant. 6. On August 3, 1995, the Government sent the Court a copy of its second report dated July 31, 1995 in which the Government informed the Court that a meeting had taken place on July 7 of this year, which was attended by Marta Elena Arrivillaga de Carpio, Karen Fischer de Carpio, Mario López-Arrivillaga and Abraham Méndez-García. At that meeting, the Minister of the Interior presented those named

3 with several proposals for their protection. They accepted the Government's proposal to provide persons for their individual protection, on the condition that each person to be protected designate his or her own security agents and that the Government assume the cost. These conditions were accepted by the Deputy Minister of the Interior. Despite their refusal to continue receiving protection from agents of the National Police, the Deputy Minister of the Interior ordered that patrols be maintained in the neighborhood of the offices of the newspaper "El Gráfico" and at the residence of Mrs. Marta Elena Arrivillaga de Carpio, widow of Carpio-Nicolle. The Government also announced that Mr. Mario López-Arrivillaga, nephew of Marta Elena Arrivillaga de Carpio and former member of parliament of the UCN party, has a National Police security agent at his service and that Mrs. Marta Elena Arrivillaga de Carpio has two security agents from the National Police since before the instatement of the present provisional measures. As to Mr. Ángel Isidro Girón-Girón, the report stated that he works with the Treasury Police in the Department of Totonicapan, but the Report did not specify on the measures that had been taken by the Government for his security. 7. In this second report the Government also revealed that on July 14, 1995 in compliance with the President's request, it had asked the Minister of National Defense to circulate precise orders to the authorities of Military Zone Number 20, based in Santa Cruz del Quiché, El Quiché, to instruct the Voluntary Civil Defense Committees of San Pedro Jocopilas to refrain from taking any actions that would put at risk the life or personal integrity of any one of the persons for whom provisional measures had been adopted. 8. On September 1, 1995 the Government sent the Court a copy of the third report in which it stated that the provisional measures taken on behalf of Marta Elena Arrivillaga de Carpio, Karen Fischer de Carpio, Mario López-Arrivillaga, Ángel Isidro Girón-Girón and Abraham Méndez-García continued in force and that those individuals had forwarded the names of the persons they wanted assigned to guard their personal safety. Subsequently the Minister of the Interior proceeded to contract the guards who had been designated. According to this report, Mrs. Marta Elena Arrivillaga de Carpio and Mrs. Karen Fisher de Carpio each have four persons assigned to their security and Mr. Abraham Méndez has been assigned two persons. Mr. Mario López-Arrivillaga refused the allocation of additional persons for his security. The Ministry of the Interior was awaiting the list of names of the persons who would be responsible for the security of Mrs. Lorraine Maric Fischer-Pivaral. In relation to the incident which befell Mrs. Fischer-Pivaral on July 7, 1995, giving rise to the expansion of provisional measures, the Government announced that the State Attorney General had initiated an investigation to which he assigned Prosecutor Alfonso Palacios. This report did not specify the security measures that the State had afforded to Mr. Ángel Isidro Girón-Girón. 9. The public hearing took place on September 16, 1995 at the seat of the Court. There appeared: For the Government of Guatemala: Vicente Arranz-Sanz, President of COPREDEH, Angel Comte-Cojulún, Director General of the National Police, Dennis Alonzo-Mazariegos, Executive Director of COPREDEH,

4 Cruz Munguía-Sosa, General Regional Coordinator of COPREDEH. For the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights: Claudio Grossman, delegate, David J. Padilla, attorney, Denise Gilman, attorney, Ariel Dulitzky, assistant, Marcela Matamoros, assistant. 10. On September 16, 1995, during the public hearing, the Commission presented to the Court a document dated February 8, 1995 from Prosecutor Abraham Méndez-García addressed to the Central Regional Director of the United Nations Verification Commission for Guatemala -MINUGUA- in which he reported that he had "been the object of surveillance, harassment, intimidation, and assault" as a result of his procedural role in the investigation of the Carpio Nicolle Case, and that he had informed the proper authorities of these facts. In view of the submission of this document, the Government requested that the Court grant it a period of time to make observations, which was granted. Moreover, during the hearing the Government promised to make an appointment with Mr. Ángel Isidro Girón-Girón to verify the necessity of adopting provisional measures to protect his life and personal integrity. WHEREAS: 1. That Guatemala is a Party to the American Convention on Human Rights in which Article 1(1) sets forth the obligation of the State Parties to respect the rights and freedoms recognized in that treaty and to ensure their free and full exercise to all persons subject to its jurisdiction, and that on March 9, 1987 Guatemala accepted the compulsory jurisdiction of this Court pursuant to Article 62 of the Convention; 2. That Article 63(2) of the Convention provides that: In cases of extreme gravity and urgency, and when necessary to avoid irreparable damage to persons, the Court shall adopt such provisional measures as it deems pertinent in matters it has under consideration. With respect to a case not yet submitted to the Court, it may act at the request of the Commission. 3. That Guatemala is obligated in every case to preserve the life and integrity of those persons whose rights could be threatened; 4. That the Court considers that the measures taken by the President on June 4 and July 26 of the present year are necessary and should be ratified, 5. That the Government of Guatemala, through its representative, explicitly and repeatedly expressed during the hearing its willingness to maintain and ensure the effectiveness of the provisional measures ordered by the Court in this case. THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, exercising the authority conferred on it by Article 63(2) of the American Convention

5 on Human Rights and Article 24 of its Rules, DECIDES: 1. To confirm and to adopt as its own the urgent measures taken by the President in the Orders of June 4 and July 26, 1995. 2. That these provisional measures will be in force for six months as of notification of this Order. 3. To require the Government of the Republic of Guatemala to continue providing monthly information on the provisional measures taken. 4. To require the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights to present to the Court its observations on the information submitted by the Government no later than fifteen days after its receipt. 5. That the President of the Court will order additional pertinent measures, if necessary, depending on the facts put forth by the Commission at the September 16, 1995 hearing. Done in Spanish and English, the Spanish text being authentic, on this nineteenth day of September, 1995. Héctor Fix-Zamudio President Hernán Salgado-Pesantes Alejandro Montiel-Argüello Máximo Pacheco-Gómez Oliver Jackman Alirio Abre-Burelli Antônio A. Cançado Trindade Manuel E. Ventura-Robles Secretary