VA Benefits, Applications, and Appeals

Similar documents
Chapter 7: The VA Claims Process

VA Appeals Today and Tomorrow

Overview of the Appeal Process for Veterans Claims

Overview of the Appeal Process for Veterans Claims

Veterans Affairs: The U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims Judicial Review of VA Decision Making

NOTICE OF DISAGREEMENT NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPEAL

VETERANS LAW: YEAR IN REVIEW. Gregg Maxon Law Office of Richard G. Maxon

VA PRESUMPTIONS ARE REBUTTABLE

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS. No On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals. (Decided January 22, 2018)

BOARD OF VETERANS' APPEALS DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS WASHINGTON, DC 20420

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO Before KASOLD, Chief Judge, and HAGEL, MOORMAN, LANCE, DAVIS, and SCHOELEN, Judges.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

BOARD OF VETERANS' APPEALS DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS WASHINGTON, DC 20420

Due Process for Veterans. Cushman v. Shinseki, 576 F.3d 1290 (Fed. Cir. 2009) A. Advocates and veterans know that obtaining benefits from the VA can

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals. (Decided May 9, 2013)

Designated for electronic publication only UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO Before PIETSCH, Judge. MEMORANDUM DECISION

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Schellinger v. McDonald: Judicial Inefficiency

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Board of Veterans' Appeals Washington DC January 2000

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/08/18 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

NOTICE OF DISAGREEMENT AND REQUEST FOR APPELLATE REVIEW

The Department of Veterans Affairs Obligations Toward Claimants: Analysis of the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS N O On Motion for Reconsideration. (Decided May 28, 2010)

BOARD OF VETERANS' APPEALS DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS WASHINGTON, DC 20420

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Copyright 1995 by National Clearinghouse for Legal Services, Inc. All rights reserved. At A Glance

Not published UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS. Before HAGEL, Judge. O R D E R

Appeals Modernization

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals

Designated for publication UNITED STATES COURT OF VETERANS APPEALS. v. VA File No

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS. No On Remand from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Missing Transmittal Sheets / Changes As of 08/12/2014 6/18/13 3/26/13 2/29/12 2/13/12 9/27/11

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS N O On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals. (Decided March 27, 2007 )

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS N O On Remand from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

UNITED STATES COURT OF VETERANS APPEALS. No On Appellee's Motion for Summary Affirmance. (Submitted July 24, 1991 Decided December 13, 1991)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals

VETERANS LAW JOURNAL A Quarterly Publication of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims Bar Association

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals

WERE THEY RIGHT OR WRONG?: SOME COMMENTARY ON THREE CASES FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

NORTH CAROLINA APPELLATE PRO BONO PROGRAM

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals. (Decided May 16, 2014)

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF NORFOLK Charles D. Griffith, Jr., Judge. In this appeal, we consider whether an attorney who

SEC. 2 PRESUMPTION OF SERVICE CONNECTION FOR DISEASES ASSOCIATED WITH EXPOSURE TO CERTAIN HERBICIDE AGENTS.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals. (Decided March 23, 2006 )

STATUTE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO On Remand from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Not published UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

Blue Ribbon Commission

Name: San Francisco Telephone #: address: *Principal office address must be in San Francisco and listed with the State Bar of California:

LeGaL Lawyer Referral Network Rules for Network Membership*

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals. (Decided July 22, 2014)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS. No On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals

Her Justice, Inc. Service Area: This Provider At a Glance

Case 1:13-cv Document 2 Filed 11/19/13 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Designated for electronic publication only UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO Before PIETSCH, Judge. MEMORANDUM DECISION

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No MICHAEL V. PELLICANO, Appellant

DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS 807 Maine Ave., SW Washington, D.C Phone (202) Fax (202) February 2008

H.R. 3715, the Final Farewell Act of 2015

UNRAVELING THE MYSTERY OF THE CHARACTER AND FITNESS PROCESS

208.4 Inquiry Panel Review. applicant has established that he or she possesses the character and fitness necessary to practice law in

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 6:12-cv DAB. versus. No.

No In the Supreme Court of the United States ARNOLD J. PARKS, ERIK K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent.

Where Should I File My Lawsuit in California? bc-llp.com 1

BOARD OF VETERANS APPEALS DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS WASHINGTON, DC 20420

DOJ RECOGNITION AND ACCREDITATION. A Step-by-Step Guide for Non- Profit Community-Based Agencies

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

CBA Municipal Court Pro Bono Panel Program Municipal Procedure Guide 1 February 2011

The Supreme Court of South Carolina

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

PLAN OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. In Implementation of. The Criminal Justice Act

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

TRIBAL CODE CHAPTER 82: APPEALS

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Drafting New York Civil-Litigation Documents: Part VI The Answer

ANTHONY M. RIZZO, JR. OPINION BY v. Record No JUSTICE CYNTHIA D. KINSER February 27, 1998 VIRGINIA RETIREMENT SYSTEM, ET AL.

Insider s Guide to the Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing Board

NOS , , , , , , , , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

Consumer Guide to the Legal Fee Arbitration Program

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

CLIENT FEE DISPUTE ARBITRATION DOCUMENTS

COSTS IN THE FIRST-TIER AND UPPER TRIBUNALS: DOES THE REGIME PROMOTE ACCESS TO JUSTICE?

GRIEVANCE AND ARBITRATION PROCEDURES FOR ANY DISPUTES RELATING TO EMPLOYEES AND JOB APPLICANTS OF BILL S ELECTRIC COMPANY

Semantic Types for Decomposing Evidence Assessment in Decisions on Veterans Disability Claims for PTSD

El-Shabazz v. State of New York Committee on Character and Fitness for th...udicial Department et al Doc. 26. Defendants.

HEARINGS HELD BY TABLE OF CONTENTS. 700 Objective Subpart A Fair Hearings for Applicants and Recipients of Public Assistance Programs

FLORIDA STATE LODGE FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, INC.

Rules of Practice for Protests and Appeals Regarding Eligibility for Inclusion in the U.S.

LEO 1880: QUESTIONS PRESENTED:

Transcription:

******************************************************** VII. VA Benefits, Applications, and Appeals David H. Myers - Washington, D.C. **********************************************************

THE VETERANS CONSORTIUM PRO BONO PROGRAM WWW.VETSPROBONO.ORG 1-888-838-7727 1 The Veterans Consortium 2015 PROVIDING PRO BONO REPRESENTATION BEFORE THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS 2 1

WHAT DO WE DO? We provide all qualifying veterans and their families, caregivers, and survivors, located anywhere in the world, free legal representation at: the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims the Federal Circuit and Supreme Court as needed We assist back at the BVA / RO after a Court decision We arrange limited free medical & psych reviews We will never ask your veteran or you to pay for legal representation in federal court Placed first case in October 1992 3 The Veterans Consortium 2015 FY1993 FY2015 TRACK RECORD Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims Supreme Court Federal Circuit 2 91 Won = 3,614 Lost = 962 4,576 cases represented pro bono; 79% lifetime win rate Not Accepted = 7,782 (no jurisdiction, ineligible, no issue of merit) 12,676 requests for pro bono attorney services from FY1993 FY 2015 4 The Veterans Consortium 2015 2

A YEAR-IN-THE-LIFE OF TVC Approximately 15,000 calls More than 27,000 web site hits (74% new visitors) Provide advice or information to more than 1,600 veterans, loved ones, and survivors Receive 500 to 600 requests to help Vets at the Court Train ~ 200 to 250 new volunteer attorneys Volunteer attorneys donate more than $5 to $6 million in pro bono services (> $88 million since FY1993) Source: TVC mission metrics reports 5 HOW WE DO IT Reach out to Veterans and their Families, Caregivers, and Survivors who have received adverse BVA decisions Evaluate cases for pro bono placement Recruit, train, and mentor volunteer attorneys in veterans law and CAVC practice Carefully match clients with volunteers Provide Direct Representation for medically complex or time-sensitive cases Facilitate law school clinics representation 6 3

MYTH BUSTER QUIZ: TRUE OR FALSE? Pro bono means free except when I pay 20% after they win = FALSE (free means free) My claim is too small = FALSE Pro bono means you have to be turned down first by a private lawyer = FALSE Service Officers can t refer for legal services = FALSE (Congressional program; not a specific lawyer; volunteers managed by a 501(c)(3) charity) It s too hard to win in federal court = FALSE 7 The Veterans Consortium 2015 Mentor RESOURCES FOR YOU Website http://www.vetsprobono.org/attorneys/ Refresher video, sample briefs, pleadings, etc. Books Veterans Benefits Manual Laws, Rules and Regulations Veterans Appeals Guidebook 8 4

LAW SCHOOL CLINICS: A RESOURCE Often include law students & professors who are veterans; more than 50 in the U.S. Offer direct civil legal services About 26 have offices in VA Medical Centers Some serve focused need (wills, elder law, consumer) Others are active in Veterans Treatment Courts Some can help with disability benefits & appeals, including cases from The Veterans Consortium 9 The Veterans Consortium 2015 VA CLAIMS & APPELLATE PROCESS 10 5

THE SYSTEM Veteran Files Claim VA Regional Office Appeals to Board of Veterans Appeals Appeal to US Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims Appeals to US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 11 THE APPELLANTS To Qualify for Pro Bono Program Services 1. Veteran Or a Qualified Family Member 2. Received an adverse BVA decision 3. Meritorious case 4. Financially Qualified 12 6

THE APPELLANTS Clients might not be combat veterans Service-connected disability compensation is available for disabilities incurred during active service Disabilities may have arisen during peacetime or while off duty (e.g., sports injuries) Only non-service-connected pension is limited to those veterans who served during a period of war 13 ENTITLEMENT TO COMPENSATION: GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Entitled to comp for disabilities incurred in or aggravated during active military, naval, or air service Service Dept findings binding on VA Service records authoritative of whether individual served & dates of service HENCE IMPORTANCE OF DISCHARGE UPGRADE 14 7

ENTITLEMENT TO COMPENSATION: GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 5 Elements of Disability Comp Claim Veteran Status Existence of current disability Connection between service & disability NEXUS Degree of disability Effective Date of benefits 15 STATUTORY PRESUMPTION Exposure to Herbicide Agents (Agent Orange): SC based on presumption for vets who served in VN, have a listed disease, & meet other requirements as to onset of disease & degree of disability Service in VN includes service in waters offshore VN ( blue water Navy vets) only if vet set foot on land, served in brown water or ship docked in VN 16 8

CLAIMS PROCESS AT VARO Representation at VAROs claimants overwhelmingly represented by lay persons (veterans service officers) Process Begins with Receipt of Claim at RO 58 ROs across country (plus 1 Appeals Management Center (AMC)) A claimant must use a standard form to begin the claims process. Informal and Inferred claims have been drastically changed. 17 CLAIMS PROCESS AT VARO ROs use new operating model that has different processing lanes depending on whether claim is simple or complex ROs using new programs in claims processing for example, the Fully Developed Claim program 18 9

CLAIMS PROCESS AT VARO Case is Referred to RO Rating Specialist: Who knows how much about what. VA does following: Gives claimant notice of evidence needed to prove entitlement Develops Claim (duty to assist) Makes Decision 19 CLAIMS PROCESS AT VARO Claimant Receives Either Award Letter or Denial Letter & copy of Rating Decision Note: new process vet may not be given copy of rating decision just notice of decision Notice of decision Must Include: Reasons for Decision List of Evidence Considered by VA Notice of Procedural & Appellate Rights 20 10

WHEN NOD FILED, CLAIMANT MAY REQUEST DE NOVO REVIEW Right to De Novo Review of RO Decision Done be Decision Review Officer or DRO who reviews facts & evid & may conduct informal hearing. DRO not allowed to retract favorable finding (w/ one exception CUE) Appeal proceeds as usual after DRO Decision (unless claim granted) DRO may grant benefit or issue Statement of the Case (SOC) 21 BOARD OF VETERANS APPEALS BVA is Final Arbiter within the VA Appellate Process Appeals assigned to Single Board Member Can have a hearing (at the BVA in Washington DC or via videoconference hearing (months) or travel board hearing (YEARS) 22 11

BVA STATS: FY15 55,713 decisions (project 57,620 in FY16) Allow Benefit in 31% of cases (historically ~ 50% include a remand issue) Remand in 45.5% of cases (90% of these come back to BVA) About 5,000 are appealed to the CAVC CAVC remands ~75% to 80% of appeals back to BVA 81,022 Pending as of FY15 23 OPTIONS AFTER BVA DENIAL 24 12

4 MAJOR OPTIONS Filing Notice of Appeal w/ CAVC 120 DAYS!!!!! Filing Claim to Reopen at RO Filing Mot for Recon w/ BVA (.02) Filing Mot to Revise Previous Final RO/BVA Decision b/c of CUE 25 GETTING A CASE FROM THE VETERANS CONSORTIUM 26 13

OUTREACH TO APPELLANTS Outreach to out any Veteran with an adverse BVA decision Includes sending information to all pro se appellants with cases at the Court They return: Request for services Financial qualification questionnaire Retainer agreement 27 TVC EVALUATES THE CASE Reviews the BVA decision Files a motion to stay if needed Reviews the Record (RBA) Creates a screening memo Factual and legal basis for identified issues A starting place your evaluation is critical 28 14

TVC EVALUATES THE CASE (CONTINUED) Rejects frivolous cases May refer a case to an experienced volunteer for counseling HELPLINE Project, assists with: Informal Brief Procedural Understanding 29 SENDING THE CASE TO YOU Ms. Carol Scott will call to offer you a case Send comprehensive notification packet to you Send your information to the appellant Send you resources ** If you can t take a case when we call let us know! ** 30 15

AND YOU Contact your client! Obtain the retainer agreement Call your mentor important resource Read the Rules of Practice and E-Filing Rules Read through the screening memo and the record File your appearance 31 NEED TO KNOW Winning is a relative concept Making a difference for the vet or their family member(s) Providing pro bono representation A remand is a win User friendly Court Appreciates pro bono work Help is here we want you to succeed 32 16

~ ETHICS ~ Competence, Communication, and Counseling* Entitled to professional, competent representation Resources are there for you: Samples, References, Mentors Keep your client informed Especially when Court issues decision! * From Ethical Foundations by Michael P. Allen 33 STANDARD OF REVIEW Findings of Law De novo Review Application of Law to Fact Arbitrary, Capricious Standard of Review 34 17

PRACTICE BEFORE THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS 35 Created in 1988, located in Washington, DC Case Load FY2015: 4,600 FY2016: ~4,900 Structure: THE COURT 8 judges (CJ Lawrence Hagel, Kasold, Lance, Schoelen, Pietsch, Davis, Bartley & Greenberg) Decisions mainly reviews of briefs: 85% single judge, 15% 3-judge panel or full court; some hearings on the road 36 The Veterans Consortium 2015 18

TWO REQUIREMENTS Two Requirements to Appeal BVA Decision to the CAVC: 1. Final Decision by the Board 2. Timely Notice of Appeal (NOA) Must be Received by CAVC within 120 Days of Mailing of BVA Decision Common law mailbox rule & USPS postmark rule Equitable tolling is allowed 37 JUDICIAL REVIEW before the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims 38 19

STANDARD OF REVIEW Findings of Fact Clearly Erroneous Review CAVC may not review favorable findings of fact made by the BVA. CAVC cannot make initial factual determination even if the record is incontrovertible on the issue involved; factual determinations are to be made by agency fact-finders. 39 SCOPE OF CAVC REVIEW Review based on Record of Proceedings before BVA CAVC to decide all relevant Q s of law, interpret constitutional, statutory, & regulatory rules compel VA action unlawfully withheld or unreasonably delayed hold unlawful and set aside decisions, findings conclusions, rules, & regs that are Arbitrary, Capricious, Abuse of Discretion, or not in Accord w/ Law Contrary to Constitutional Right or Power Exceeds Statutory Authority or Limitations Did not Observe Procedure 40 20

SINGLE-JUDGE OR PANEL? Case Will be Decided by Single Judge if: Is of Relative Simplicity Does Not Establish a New Rule of Law The Outcome is Not Reasonably Debatable Otherwise, Case Will be Decided by Panel 41 U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT--JURISDICTION Federal Circuit Has Jurisdiction Over All Questions of Law De novo Review of Questions of Law Has Jurisdiction to Review Free- Standing Constitutional Issues Does Not Have Jurisdiction Over Application of Law to Particular Facts 42 21

ATTORNEY S FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (EAJA) 43 EAJA APPLICATION Requirements for EAJA Petition: 1. Must Allege that Appellant is Prevailing Party 2. Must File Itemized Statement of Fees & Expenses Sought 3. Must Allege Govt s Position not substantially justified 4. CAVC Must Have Had Subject Matter Jurisdiction Over Lawsuit when appeal filed 44 22

THANK YOU FOR SERVING OUR VETERANS 45 23