Read Barnard, 3 rd edition, Chs 8 and 9 Treaty of Maastricht 1993 created the status of Union Citizenship Arts TFEU Treaty

Similar documents
The Free Movement of Persons

Citizenship of the European Union

THE FOUNDATION DEGREE at the University of Glamorgan

Free Movement of Workers

TABLE OF CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN DIRECTIVE 2004/38/EC AND CURRENT EC LEGISLATION ON FREE MOVEMENT AND RESIDENCE OF UNION CITIZENS WITHIN THE EU

Free Movement of Workers and the European Citizenship

EU GUIDE. Questions and answers about the rights of EU citizens

Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 23 March Brian Francis Collins v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions

The State (Netherlands) v. Ann Florence Reed (Case 59/85) Before the Court of Justice of the European Communities ECJ

Social assistance and the right to reside at the European Court of Justice Dano v Jobcenter Leipzig

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 21 February 2013 (*)

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS ON THE FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION. Working Paper IE Law School WPLS

Prof. Dr. Christof Kerwer. EU Labour Law. Baku State University. April 2013

OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL GEELHOED delivered on 19 February

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 7 September 2004 *

ARTICLES. FREE MOVEMENT OF EU CITIZENS Including for the Poor?

FEANTSA Toolkit. Free Movement of EU citizens! and access to social assistance! Guidance for Homeless Service Providers

Prof. dr. Herwig Verschueren University of Antwerp Berlin - 20 June Non-discrimination and social rights under Reg. 492/2011 and Dir.

Zambrano, Lounes and Citizenship Rights: Where Are We Now? David Blundell Landmark Chambers

Contents Civis Duplex Sum : Two Layers of Citizenship in a Dialogue of Equality Part I The Development of United States Citizenship

European Immigration and Asylum Law

composed of A. Rosas, President of the Chamber, A. Ó Caoimh, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues (Rapporteur), U. Lõhmus and P. Lindh, Judges,

Reports of Cases OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL SHARPSTON 1. delivered on 12 December Minister voor Immigratie, Integratie en Asiel v O. v S.

European Union citizenship, national welfare systems and social solidarity

Durham Research Online

Reports of Cases. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 14 June 2012 *

Union Citezenship: Impact, Influences and Challenges to Irish Immigration Laws.

FREE MOVEMENT OF EU CITIZENS: INCLUDING FOR THE POOR?

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 6 March 2003 *

Free movement of EU citizens within the EU and equal treatment for social benefits: solidarity or benefit tourism?

Session 5 Applying European Citizenship rights

The baseless fabric of this vision: EU Citizenship, the right to reside and EU law

Judgment of the Court of Justice, Zhu and Chen, Case C-200/02 (19 October 2004)

Freedom of Establishment.

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (sitting as a full Court ) 19 October 2004 *

FAMILY REUNIFICATION OF EUROPEAN COMMUNITY NATIONALS. Iris Goldner

Regina v. Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Surinder Singh ex parte. Secretary of State for the Home Department (Case C-370/90)

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 11 July 2002 *

Further proposals to restrict migrants access to benefits

OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL BOT delivered on 30 May 2017 (1) Case C 165/16. Toufik Lounes v Secretary of State for the Home Department

Edinburgh Research Explorer

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL SIR GORDON SLYNN DELIVERED ON 20 JANUARY 1982

EUROPEAN UNION CITIZENSHIP: THE JOURNEY GOES ON

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens. Law school. European Law MARKET FREEDOMS II. Smaragda Rigakou

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 11 December 2007 *

The Right of Residence under Directive 2004/38 of the. Spouse of a Union Citizen. in the absence of a Valid Passport. March 2015

Do you want to work in another EU Member State? Find out about your rights!

OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL Sharpston delivered on 12 December 2013 (1) Case C-456/12. Minister voor Immigratie, Integratie en Asiel v O

Social benefits for migrating EU citizens

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 24 October 2013 (*)

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 26 July and. The Norwegian Government, represented by the Immigration Appeals Board THE COURT,

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation

Exploring obstacles in exercising core EU citizenship rights

Recent Developments in Social Security Coordination and Free Movement of Workers

ASYLUM AND IMMIGRATION TRIBUNAL

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 23 September 2003 *

STATEMENT OF THE COUNCIL'S REASONS

Free Movement of Non-EC Nationals A Review of the Case-Law of the Court of Justice

1. WHY THE PROPOSAL? Improving the national enforcement of the rules on Free Movement of Workers. 1. Why this proposal? 2. What are the main elements?

Comparative Report The concept of worker under Article 45 TFEU and certain non-standard forms of employment

UNIO - EU Law Jounal. Vol. 1, No. 1, July 2015, pp Centre of Studies in European Union Law School of Law University of Minho

City, University of London Institutional Repository

What are the legal implications of David Cameron s demands for EU migration reform? By Professor Damian Chalmers

TAS-HAGEN AND TAS. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 26 October 2006*

The EU Legal Framework on Equality

Information sheet for secondary advisers Permanent Residence

OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL Wahl delivered on 12 December 2013 (1) Case C-507/12. Jessy Saint Prix v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions

ASYLUM AND IMMIGRATION TRIBUNAL

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 8 June 1999 *

Secretary of State for the Home Department v. Akrich (Case C-109/01) Before the Court of Justice of the European Communities ECJ

OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL GEELHOED delivered on 28 September

Migration and Nationality-based Discrimination. Migration and Nationalitybased Discrimination. Olivier De Schutter

Judgment of the Court of 6 June Roman Angonese v Cassa di Risparmio di Bolzano SpA. Reference for a preliminary ruling: Pretore di Bolzano Italy

Agreement on arrangements regarding citizens rights between Iceland, the Principality of Liechtenstein, the Kingdom of Norway and the United Kingdom

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 12 May 2011 *

FOLLOW-UP OF THE CASE LAW OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

Bachelor Thesis EU citizenship and the right to family reunification Dario Vaccaro Supervisor

Brexit and Immigration: An update on citizens rights. Withdrawal Agreement; Settlement Scheme; Future Immigration System

European Commission, Task Force for the Preparation and Conduct of the Negotiations with the United Kingdom under Article 50 TEU.

Elestina Morson and Sewradjie Jhanjan v. State of the Netherlands. (Cases 35-36/82) Before the Court of Justice of the European Communities ECJ

CEPS Working Document

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 25 July 2002 *

Looking Backwards to Go Forwards? Europe at a Crossroads

OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL GEELHOED delivered on 27 January

(First draft) UK s welfare reforms: re-shaping the paradigm of social solidarity in the EU. Dr Rufat Babayev

JUDGMENT OF CASE 53/81

The EU Legal Framework on Equality

Fordham International Law Journal

Rhiannon Morgan v Bezirksregierung Köln (C-11/06) and Iris Bucher v Landrat des Kreises Düren (C- 12/06)

Reports of Cases. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 16 July 2015 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 20 September 2001 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 19 June 2014 (*)

Civis europeus sum? Social assistance and the right to reside in EU law.

Reports of Cases. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 14 November 2017 *

Should statelessness determination procedures be addressed at the EU level?

THE CASE C-34/09 RUIZ ZAMBRANO V. ONEM THE TIMELESS JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE ON EU CITIZENSHIP

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 18 June 1987 *

LEVEL 6 - UNIT 8 IMMIGRATION LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS JANUARY 2017

Transcription:

SEMINAR 6 FREE MOVEMENT OF WORKERS Read Barnard, 3 rd edition, Chs 8 and 9 Treaty of Maastricht 1993 created the status of Union Citizenship Arts 45-48 TFEU Treaty 1. Introduction to Free movement of Persons TFEU articles/secondary legislation Overview of Arts 45 (workers), 49 (right of establishment) and 56 (free movement of cross-border services) TFEU + Directive 2004/38 OJ 2004 L158/77 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States (Citizen s Rights Directive (CRD)); Provisions re EU Citizenship to be found in Arts 20-25 TFEU Preliminary points: Article 18 no discrimination on the grounds of nationality and Article 21 Every Citizen of the Union shall have the right to move and reside freely within the territory of the MS Treaty of Amsterdam, Title IV (Arts 61-69):- now Title V TFEU - powers to introduce measures in the fields of visas, immigration and asylum 2. Personal Scope of the Freedom of Movement of Workers Is Article 45 TFEU horizontally directly effective? Yes - Walrave, case 38/74 [1974] ECR 1405; Dona v Mantero [1976] ECR 1333; Bosman Case C-415/93 [1995] ECR I-4921; Angonese, Case C-281/98 [2000] ECR I-4139 (direct effect of Art 45 TFEU) Who is a worker? What is employment? no definition in TFEU or legislation Lowrie-Blum, Case 66/85 [1986] ECR 2121 [trainee teacher] - (general definition): The essential feature of an employment relationship is that for a certain period of time a person performs services for and under the direction of another person in return for which he receives remuneration. Unger (Hoekstra) Case 75/63 [1964] ECR 177 a Community law concept Levin, Case 53/81 [1982] ECR 1035 (chamber maid) Kempf, Case 139/85 [1986] ECR 1741 (music teacher) Bettray, Case 344/87 [1989] ECR 1621 not work when provided for rehabilitation Steymann, Case 196/87 [1988] ECR 6159 (plumber) - can include members of an economically active religious community Martinez-Sala, Case C-85/96 [1998] ECR I-2691 Trojani Case C-456/02 [2004] ECR I-7573 (Salvation Army hostel 3hour p.w. for national court) Extensions to jobseekers: Procureur du Roi v Royer, Case 48/75 [1976] ECR 497 further developed in R v IAT ex p. Antonissen, Case C-292/89 [1991] ECR I-745 (right to seek work for reasonable period); Case C-138/02 Collins [2004] ECR I-2703; C-258/04 Ioannidis; C-22 and 23/08 Vatsouras *Dougan, Free Movement: The Work-seeker as a Citizen (2001) 4 CYELS 93 1

Art 46 TFEU Secondary Legislation re ancillary rights - (a bit of history!!) Directives 64/221; 68/360; 72/194; 75/34; 75/35; 90/364 ( Playboys ); 90/365 (retired persons); 93/96 (replacing Dr 93/96 on students); [all repealed and consolidated into Dr 2004/38]; Regulation 1612/68 governs access to employment and conditions of employment and deals with families rights (as amended by Dr 2004/38 ie Arts 10 and 11)) 1. Directive 68/360 (OJ 1968 L257/13) concerning the removal of restrictions on movement and residence within the Community for workers of Member States and their families. (repealed) 2. Regulation 1612/68 (JO 1968 L257/2) concerning the elaboration of the free movement principle.(arts 10 & 11 repealed) : eligibility for employment; equality of treatment; and worker s family 3. Regulation 1251/70 (OJ 1970 L142/24) on the right to remain in the territory of a Member State after having been employed in that State. 4. Directive 64/211 (OJ 1964 850) on the coordination of special measures concerning the movement and residence of foreign nationals which are justified on the grounds of public policy, public security or public health. [to be dealt with in Seminar 9] (repealed) 3. Meaning of family Art 2(a)-(d) of Directive 2004/38 - The rights of family members are derived tights, in that they depend upon the worker s status as a worker (who has exercised their right to free movement) and do not exist as independent rights nationality irrelevant. Who are the worker s family? Article 2 CRD: Article 3 CRD (a) the spouse (b) the partner with whom the Union citizen has contracted a registered partnership, on the basis of the legislation of a member State, if the legislation of the host member State treats registered partnerships as equivalent to marriage and in accordance with the conditions laid down in the relevant legislation of the host member state; [History: Netherlands v Reed Case 59/85 [1986] ECR 1283] (c) the direct descendants who are under the age of 21 or are dependants and those of the spouse or partner as defined in point 8b): (d) the dependent direct relatives in the ascending line and those of the spouse or partner as defined in point (b) What rights do they all have? (same rights/procedure as the worker but..) - Entry and residence (may need an entry visa; up to 3 months) Arts 6 and 7 CRD - Rights dependent on continuing rights of the worker (see also Regulation 1251/70- right to remain)) - Rights to remain in same circumstances as worker (Regulation 1251/70) - Rights to remain in certain other circumstances following worker s death (See Regulation 1251/70) Diatta v Land Berlin Case 267/83 [1985] ECR 567 R v IAT & Singh ex p. Secretary of State for the Home Office, Case C-370/90 [1992] ECR I-4265 Morson & Jhanjan, Cases 35 & 36/82 [1982] ECR 3723 2

Mary Carpenter, Case C-60/00 [2002] ECR I-6279 Watson Free Movement of Workers: A One Way Ticket? (1993) 22 ILJ 68 Shah UK Settlement for EC Spouses (1997) 147 NLJ 1094. 4. Material Scope of the Freedom What rights are granted? Rights conferred by Article 45(3) TFEU. Rights elaborated by Regulation 1612/68; Regulation 1251/70 (right to remain) and the Citizens Rights Directive (CRD) (a) accept offers of employment actually made (b) to move freely within the territory of Member States for this purpose (c) to stay in a Member State for the purpose of employment in accordance with the provisions governing the employment of nationals of that State laid down by law, regulation or administrative action (+Art 16 CRD) (d) to remain in the territory of a Member State after having been employed in that State, subject to conditions which shall be embodied in implementing regulations to be drawn up by the Commission. Worker s Rights (Arts 1-12 of Regulation 1612/68 eg Art 7(2) and (3) re social and tax advantages ) Casagrande, Case 9/74 [1974] ECR 773 Michel S, Case 76/72 [1973] ECR 457 Fiorini, Case 32/75 [1975] ECR 1085 Ministere Public v Even [1979] ECR 2019 Reina, Case 65/81 [1982] ECR 33 Mutsch, Case 137/84 [1985] ECR 2681 Castelli, Case 261/83 [1984] ECR 3199 Lebon, Case 316/85 [1987] ECR 2811 5. Principle of non-discrimination on the grounds of nationality Clarified in Art 45 and elaborated in Regulation 1612/68, Art 7(1) Article 45(2) TFEU:.. such freedom of movement shall entail the abolition of any discrimination based on nationality between workers of the MS as regards employment, remuneration and other conditions of work and employment. See Groener, Case 378/87 [1989] ECR 3967 (language requirement, indirect discrimination? No discrimination); Case 167/73 Commission v France (Code Maritime) [1974] ECR 359 (direct discrimination) Regulation 1612/68: Article 7 no discrimination as regards conditions of work eg Ugliola, Case 15/69 [1969] ECR 363 BUT Article 3 linguistic knowledge See Groener (above) ECJ: principle may be relied upon not only against Member States and public authorities but also against private individuals confirmed in Case C-281/98 Angonese [2000] CMLR 1120 3

Market access Bosman, Case C-415/93 [2995] ECR I-4921 (non-discriminatory measures) Graf, Case C-190/98 [2000] ECR I-493 6. Citizenship (Arts 20-25) case law based on Art 21(1) and Art 18 FEU NB: the right of Citizenship does not bring any new free movement rights into being but formally attaches existing rights with all the qualifications and exceptions, to the new citizenship. However the CJEU appears to have breathed life into the concept of EU citizenship in a series of cases. NB Art 21 TFEU together with Art 18 irrespective of any economic nexus Case C-85/96 Martinez Sala v Freidstaat Bayern [1998] ECR I-2691 (non-workers/noneconomically active) Case C-356/98 Kaba [2003] ECR I-2219 (citizenship is a right of paramount importance in Community Law) Case C-184/99 Grzelczyk [2001] ECR I-6193 Case C-413/99 Baumbast [2002] ECR I-7091 (citizenship + proportionality direct effect confirmed) *Case C-148/02 Garcia Avello *Case C-200/02 Chen [2004] ECR I- (3 rd country national) Case C-209/03 Bidar (Art 18(1) + Dr. 90/364) Case C-224/02 Pusa Case C-403/03 Schempp Case C-406/04 De Cuyper Case C-192/05 Tas-Hagen Cases (Joined) C-11/06 & C-12/06 Morgan Case C-258/07 Forster *Case C-34/09 Zambrano * Case C-434/09 McCarthy * Case C-256/11 Dereci NB * Erosion of the wholly internal rule takes increasingly little to trigger application of EU Law Further reading Barnard Of students and babies (2005) CLJ 560 Jacqueson Union Citizenship and the Court of Justice: something new under the sun? Towards global citizenship? (2002) ELRev 260 Somek Solidarity.. Being and Time in European Citizenship (2007) ELRev 787 Meulman & de Waele Funding the life of Brian: job seekers, wekfare shopping & the frontier of Europe Citizenship (2004) Legal Issues of Economic Integration 275-288 O Leary Putting flesh on the bones of EU Citizenship (1999) ELRev 68. 4

5