Litigation Webinar Series. Hatch-Waxman 101. Chad Shear Principal, San Diego

Similar documents
HOGAN & HARTSON APR -9 P4 :18 BY HAND DELIVERY

FDA Regulatory February 18, 2015

PHARMACEUTICAL LAW GROUP PC

Some Declaratory Judgment Guidance For ANDA Litigants

SUCCESSFULLY LITIGATING METHOD OF USE PATENTS IN THE U.S.

Supreme Court Invites Solicitor General s View on Safe Harbor of the Hatch-Waxman Act

From PLI s Program New Strategies Arising from the Hatch-Waxman Amendments #4888

Caraco V. Novo Nordisk: Antitrust Implications

FDA, PATENT TERM EXTENSIONS AND THE HATCH WAXMAN ACT. Dr.Sumesh Reddy- Dr. Reddys Lab Hyderabad-

An ANDA Update. June 2004 Bulletin 04-50

Patent and Exclusivity Update

Recent developments in US law: Remedies and damages for improper patent listings in the FDA s Orange Book

A. Bayer's New Drug Application for Precose

Issue Brief for Congress Received through the CRS Web

(4- I. Background. Douald O. Beers Arnold & Porter LLP 555 Twelfth Street, N.W. Washington, D.c

The ITC's Potential Role In Hatch-Waxman Litigation

PATENT, TRADEMARK & COPYRIGHT!

Delayed Access to Generic Medicine: A Comment on the Hatch-Waxman Act and the "Approval Bottleneck

We have carefully considered the Petition.! For the reasons described below, the Petition is granted.

Iff/]) FEB Gregory 1. Glover Pharmaceutical Law Group PC 900 Seventh Street, NW Suite 650 Washington, DC

Health Care Law Monthly

Patent Infringement and Experimental Use Under the Hatch-Waxman Act: Current Issues

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/09/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Post-Grant for Practitioners

The Hatch-Waxman Act and Market Exclusivity for Generic Manufacturers: An Entitlement or an Incentive

Patent Litigation for the Non-Specialist: How it Works and What to Expect

Patent Litigation for the Non-Specialist: How it Works and What to Expect

The Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations: What patents are eligible to be listed on the register?

Guidance for Industry

A. ANDAs and Eligibility for 180-day Exclusivity

PENDING LEGISLATION REGULATING PATENT INFRINGEMENT SETTLEMENTS

Pharmaceutical Patent Settlement Cases: Mixed Signals for Settling Patent Litigation

THE SAFE HARBOR PROVISION OF HATCH-WAXMAN IS THERE A HOLE IN THE SAFETY NET?

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendants.

In ThIs Issue. What s in a Name? Quantifying the Economic Value of Label Information

The Korean Drug Approval-Patent Linkage System: A Comparison with the US Hatch-Waxman Act

Case 1:10-cv JCJ Document 20 Filed 04/14/10 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Detailed Table of Contents

Supreme Court of the United States

Pharmaceutical Product Improvements and Life Cycle Management Antitrust Pitfalls 1

This responds to your citizen petition dated July 24, 2009, submitted on behalf of Osmotica

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

CBM Eligibility and Reviewability

21 C.F.R DEFINITIONS

o 1205 Culbreth Dr., Suite 200, Wilmington, NC Phone : Facsimile :

Follow this and additional works at:

Case 8:14-cv GJH Document 1 Filed 08/19/14 Page 1 of 22

Alexandra Robertson. 2011). 2 See Momenta Pharm., Inc. v. Amphastar Pharm., Inc., 686 F.3d 1348 (Fed. Cir. 2012).

A New History and Discussion of 180-Day Exclusivity

Hatch-Waxman Patented v. Generic Drugs: Regulatory, Legislative and Judicial Developments

Early Resolution Mechanism for Patent Disputes Regarding Approved Drug Products - Canada

Case 2:09-cv DMC-MF Document 17 Filed 04/20/2009 Page 1 of 28 : :

Pay-for-Delay Settlements: Antitrust Violation or Proper Exercise of Pharmaceutical Patent Rights?

Attorneys for Defendants Watson Laboratories, Inc. and Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Case 3:14-cv MLC-TJB Document Filed 07/24/15 Page 2 of 16 PageID: 1111 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 1 BACKGROUND...

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

No IN THE EISAI CO. LTD AND EISAI MEDICAL RESEARCH, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., through its GATE PHARMACEUTICALS Division,

The America Invents Act : What You Need to Know. September 28, 2011

Increased Scrutiny of Reverse Payment Settlements: Recent Cases in E.D. of PA and 2nd Circuit Suggest Change May Be Ahead for Pharma Clients

SEC. 9. ENSURING THAT VALID GENERIC DRUGS MAY ENTER THE MARKET. (a) 180-Day Exclusivity Period Amendments Regarding First Applicant Status.

S. ll IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

Injunctive Relief for Standard-Essential Patents

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Enjoining Life Sciences Competition: A Review and Discussion

EXTENDING THE LIFE OF A PATENT IN THE UNITED STATES

Life Sciences Industry Perspective on Declaratory Judgment Actions and Licensing Post-MedImmune. Roadmap for Presentation

No IN THE MYLAN LABORATORIES, INC., MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., & UDL LABORATORIES, INC.,

Case 3:11-cv JAP -TJB Document 32 Filed 07/06/11 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 530 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

The Balance Between Innovation and Competition: The Hatch- Waxman Act, the 2003 Amendments, and Beyond

United States. Country QUESTIONNAIRE

Segal McCambridge Singer & Mahoney, Ltd Market Street, Suite 2600 Philadelphia, PA (215) Fax: (215) : : : : : : : : : :

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/07/16 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:07-cv RMU Document 71-2 Filed 05/08/2007 Page 1 of 6. ANDA , Amlodipine Besylate Tablets, 2.5 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg.

Case 1:18-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 03/27/18 Page 1 of 87 PageID #: 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

21 CFR Part 50 - Protection of Human Subjects

BNA s Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal

Supreme Court of the United States

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/04/17 Page 1 of 15

~ln $~e OFR.C.E OF_THE CLERK t reme ourt i mte tate PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Case 1:09-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 07/13/2009 Page 1 of 17

Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Attention: Scott Tomsky Vice President, U.S. Generics Regulatory Affairs 425 Privet Road Horsham, PA 19044

Are the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations Working?

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/13/16 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:12-cv RBW Document 9 Filed 12/03/12 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Using the ITC as a Trademark Enforcement Tool

) ) Court to enter a preliminary injunction ordering the Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) to

Attachment C M AY Daniel J. Tomasch, Esq. Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP 666 Fifth Ave. New York, NY Dear Mr.

Case 1:18-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 01/19/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

INTELLECTUALPROPERTY OWNERS WHITE PAPER APPLICATION OF INDUCEDINFRINGEMENT LAW JANUARY 2013 IN PHARMACEUTICAL PATENT LITIGATION

Terminating Inter Partes Review Proceedings Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board

CARACO PHARMACEUTICAL LABORATORIES, LTD., et al., PETITIONERS v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al.

In the Supreme Court of the United States

2013 PA Super 215. Appellants No. 83 EDA 2012

Case 1:11-cv RGA Document 10 Filed 01/13/12 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 47

Case 1:10-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/05/10 Page 1 of 20

Experimental Use Exemption of Patent Infringement A Brief Comparison of China and the United States

AIA: How U.S. PTO Proceedings. are Changing Patent Litigation. Post-Grant Review Under the. Practice. David Hoffman. James Babineau.

Case 1:16-cv RBK-JS Document 1 Filed 06/30/16 Page 1 of 14 PageID: 1

AIA PROCEEDINGS: A PRESCRIPTION FOR ACCELERATING THE AVAILABILITY OF GENERIC DRUGS

20 Trends in the U.S. Pro - Patent Policy in the Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Fields Focusing on the Hatch-Waxman Act

Transcription:

Litigation Webinar Series Hatch-Waxman 101 Chad Shear Principal, San Diego 1

Overview Hatch-Waxman Series Housekeeping CLE Contact: Jane Lundberg lundberg@fr.com Questions January 25, 2018 INSIGHTS Litigation Webinar Series Materials: www.fr.com/webinars #fishwebinar Upcoming Webinar Hatch-Waxman 102 1:00 2:00 pm ET 2

Drug Discovery & Development Drug Discovery Preclinical testing IND Approved Phase I & II Phase III FDA Accepts NDA Review of NDA NDA approved by FDA Phase IV (post market) 9-15 years Years 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 3

Drug Discovery & Development Drug Discovery Preclinical testing IND Approved Phase I & II Phase III FDA Accepts NDA Review of NDA NDA approved by FDA Phase IV (post market) 9-15 years Years 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 4

Generic Timeline Generic Resource Commitment Product Development & Bioequivalency Testing ANDA Filed with FDA ANDA Approved Generic Marketed ~ 18 months-36 months Years 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 5

Generic Timeline Generic Resource Commitment Product Development & Bioequivalency Testing ANDA Filed with FDA ANDA Approved Generic Marketed ~ 18 months-36 months Years 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 6

The Great Compromise 7

Hatch-Waxman Act Is a Compromise The Act was legislatively negotiated to strike: a balance between two potentially competing policy interests inducing pioneering development of pharmaceutical formulations and methods and facilitating efficient transition to a market with lowcost, generic copies of those pioneering inventions at the close of a patent term. Novo Nordisk A/S, et al. v. Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd., et al., No. 2010-1001 (Fed. Cir., April 14, 2010), at 2. 8

The Compromise Brand Industry ( 505(j)(5)(F): 5 year filing exclusivity ( data exclusivity ) for new chemical entities (NCE) 3 year marketing exclusivity based on new clinical trials Patent Term Extension for time patented product is under review by FDA Generic Industry: Use of Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs) 180-Day Generic Drug Exclusivity for first Paragraph IV filer(s) Ability to develop product free of worry of infringement suit (Safe Harbor) Both Opportunity for Court to decide patent issues pre-launch 9

It s Working 10

It s Working 11

How Does it Work... 12

Hatch-Waxman Act Key Concepts Easier routes of approval Exclusivities List of relevant patents Generic certification and notice re: patents Patent Challenge/Safe Harbor Stay of Approval 180-Day Exclusivity 13

Easier Routes to Drug Approval (21 USC 355) 505(b)(1) or New Drug Application ( NDA ) Full clinical trials, patent declaration 505(b)(2) or paper NDA New drugs partial clinical trials, reliance on published safety and efficacy data, patent declaration Generic drugs partial clinical trials, reliance on unpublished safety and efficacy data, patent certification 505 (j) or Abbreviated New Drug Application ( ANDA ) true generic Clinical trials often not required, reliance on data for the approved branded drug, patent certification Can petition FDA to change active ingredient (combination drug), route, dosage or strength Inactive ingredient changes permitted in some cases 14

Exclusivities Scope: drugs, combinations regulated as drugs, new antibiotics (since 1997) 5 year data exclusivity New active moieties only No generic or 505(b)(2) application can be filed for 5 years 4 year exclusivity if Orange Book listed patent is challenged 3 Year marketing exclusivity Clinicals required; must be essential to approval; change in dosage, new patient regulation, new indications, Rx to OTC No generic or 505(b)(2) can be approved for 3 years Pediatric Exclusivity Orphan Drug Exclusivity 15

Pediatric Exclusivity Scope: clinical studies in pediatric populations Drugs and biologics (2009 ACA) Protects active moiety; all indications, dosages, strengths Adds 6 months protection to all other exclusivities Listed patents also get 6 months of protection Protects combination drugs containing active moiety 16

Orphan Drug Exclusivity Scope: population <200,000 or no expectation of cost recovery Drugs and biologics 7 years protection No FDA approval for same product for same indication unless clinically superior clinical superiority means drug is not the same OD designation must be made before NDA/BLA submission Tax credits, fee waivers, grants 17

2015 2016 18

Listings of Patents The Orange Book 19

Orange Book Listing Eligibility Patent must claim a drug or method of using a drug for which a claim of patent infringement could reasonably be asserted 2003 Orange Book Reforms no packaging patents, metabolites or intermediates FDA Form 3542 Patent Information Timing Use patents must be identified on label Patent use code provided for each method patent Signed under penalty of perjury New patents (after NDA approved) must be filed within 30 days to perfect issue date in OB NDA Sponsor must submit within 30 days of approval of NDA or supplement and patent issuance If submitted after 30 days, pending ANDAs do NOT have to certify Sections 505(b)(1)(G); (c)(2); 21 CFR 314.53

Orange Book Listing - Use Code Tool for FDA identifies language on label protected by method patents Drafted by pioneer based on reasonable claim construction 240 character max Caraco v. Novo Nordisk (Supreme Court 2012) use code cannot prevent generic from marketing a drug for an approved use not claimed by the patent 21

Section viii Carve Out 505(j)(2)(A)(viii) Permits a generic to carve out of label approved uses that it is not seeking approval for Generic product must still be safe and effective for remaining approved uses Impact: ANDA with carved out label can be approved absent another PIV (i.e. no First to File blocking approval) 22

35 USC 271(e)(2) filing of ANDA or 505(b)(2) is an act of infringement if the purpose is to obtain approval to engage in the commercial manufacture, use or sale of a drug before the expiration of such patent. 23

Patent Certification For each patent listed in the Orange Book, Generics must certify one of the following: Paragraph I patent information has not been filed FDA can approve ANDA whenever ready to Paragraph II patent has expired FDA can approve ANDA whenever ready to Paragraph III date patent will expire FDA can approve ANDA when patent expires and ANDA is ready to be approved Paragraph IV such patent is invalid or will not be infringed by the manufacture, use, or sale of the drug for which the application is submitted Much more complicated approval window 24

Paragraph IV Certification Generic applicant must state: That an application that contains data from a bioequivalence or bioavailability study has been submitted; Seeking approval to engage in the commercial manufacture, use, or sale of the listed drug before the expiration of the listed patent(s); and The factual and legal basis that the ANDA applicant believes that the patent is invalid or will not be infringed Generic must send notice letter within 20 days from ANDA receipt acknowledgement letter from FDA FDA does not police the sufficiency of the notice letter 25

Safe Harbor (35 USC 271(e)(1)) 271(e)(1): It shall not be an act of infringement to make, use, offer to sell within the US or import into the US a patented invention solely for uses reasonably related to the development and submission of information under a Federal Law which regulates the manufacture, use or sale of drugs or veterinary biological products. 26

Safe Harbor (35 USC 271(e)(1)) Scope of Safe Harbor: Supreme Court decision in Merck v. Integra says Safe Harbor extends to all uses of patented inventions that are reasonably related to the development and submission of any information under the FDCA. This necessarily includes preclinical studies of patented compounds that are appropriate for submission to the FDA in the regulatory process. There is simply no room in the statute for excluding certain information from the exemption on the basis of the phase of research in which it is developed or the particular submission in which it could be included. Bottom line actions related to seeking FDA approval are not infringement 27

Patent Challenge Filing of ANDA is an artificial act of infringement NDA sponsor can sue when it receives notice Infringement suit can begin before ANDA approval If suit brought within 45 days of notice, ANDA approval is stayed for 30 months Computation of 45-day time clock. (1) The 45-day clock described in paragraph (b)(3) of this section begins on the day after the date of receipt of the applicant's notice of certification by the patent owner or its representative, and by the approved application holder. When the 45th day falls on Saturday, Sunday, or a Federal holiday, the 45th day will be the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or a Federal holiday. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/cfrsearch.cfm?fr=314.107 If no suit within 45 days, FDA can approve ANDA at its discretion 28

Stay of Approval Approval stayed pending outcome of suit (up to 30 months) Can be shortened or extended by Court Only get one 30-month stay Later listed patents require certification but do not impact first to file status or 30-month stay Tentative Approval ANDA ready for approval but blocked by patent, exclusivity or stay Only eligible for tentative approval Full approval not automatic Must be requested Will not be given until block is cleared Expiration of 30-month stay Generic wins Settlement of case 29

180-Day Exclusivity Protects first generic to challenge listed patent No other application can be approved until the expiration of 180-days of marketing by the first to file applicant Can be shared (same day first to file) Immensely valuable to generic because of states mandatory substitution laws 30

What Happens after Generic Entry 31

Drug Prices Based on Number of Generics in Market 32

Shared 180-Day Exclusivity First-to-file ANDAs may enter market at once if approved ANDA 1, ANDA 2, ANDA 3 0 180 Or sequentially depending on approval ANDA 1 ANDA 2 ANDA 3 0 180 Or sequentially depending on their intent to market ANDA 1 ANDA 2 ANDA 3 0 180 ALL EXCLUSIVITY ENDS AFTER FIRST TRIGGERED 180-DAY MARK 33

21 USC 355(j)(5)(D) (D) Forfeiture of 180-day exclusivity period. (i)definition of forfeiture event. In this subparagraph, the term forfeiture event, with respect to an application under this subsection, means the occurrence of any of the following: (I) Failure to market. The first applicant fails to market the drug by the later of (aa) the earlier of the date that is (AA) 75 days after the date on which the approval of the application of the first applicant is made effective under subparagraph (B)(iii); or (BB) 30 months after the date of submission of the application of the first applicant; or (bb) with respect to the first applicant or any other applicant (which other applicant has received tentative approval), the date that is 75 days after the date as of which, as to each of the patents with respect to which the first applicant submitted and lawfully maintained a certification qualifying the first applicant for the 180-day exclusivity period under subparagraph (B)(iv), at least 1 of the following has occurred: (AA) In an infringement action brought against that applicant with respect to the patent or in a declaratory judgment action brought by that applicant with respect to the patent, a court enters a final decision from which no appeal (other than a petition to the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari) has been or can be taken that the patent is invalid or not infringed. (BB) In an infringement action or a declaratory judgment action described in subitem (AA), a court signs a settlement order or consent decree that enters a final judgment that includes a finding that the patent is invalid or not infringed. (b). (CC) The patent information submitted under subsection (b) or (c) is withdrawn by the holder of the application approved under subsection (II) Withdrawal of application. The first applicant withdraws the application or the Secretary considers the application to have been withdrawn as a result of a determination by the Secretary that the application does not meet the requirements for approval under paragraph (4). (III) Amendment of certification. The first applicant amends or withdraws the certification for all of the patents with respect to which that applicant submitted a certification qualifying the applicant for the 180-day exclusivity period. (IV) Failure to obtain tentative approval. The first applicant fails to obtain tentative approval of the application within 30 months after the date on which the application is filed, unless the failure is caused by a change in or a review of the requirements for approval of the application imposed after the date on which the application is filed. (V) Agreement with another applicant, the listed drug application holder, or a patent owner. The first applicant enters into an agreement with another applicant under this subsection for the drug, the holder of the application for the listed drug, or an owner of the patent that is the subject of the certification under paragraph (2)(A)(vii)(IV), the Federal Trade Commission or the Attorney General files a complaint, and there is a final decision of the Federal Trade Commission or the court with regard to the complaint from which no appeal (other than a petition to the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari) has been or can be taken that the agreement has violated the antitrust laws (as defined in section 12 of title 15, except that the term includes section 45 of title 15 to the extent that that section applies to unfair methods of competition). (VI) Expiration of all patents. All of the patents as to which the applicant submitted a certification qualifying it for the 180-day exclusivity period have expired. 34

180-Day Forfeiture Events - 505(j)(5)(D) Generic can forfeit its 180-day exclusivity by: 1. Failing to obtain tentative approval in 30 months 2. Failing to market within specified time after approval 3. Expiration of all patents with which exclusivity is associated 4. Withdrawal of the ANDA or all of the Para. IV certifications 5. Enters into an agreement that is a violation of the antitrust laws 35

Questions? 36

Thank you! Chad Shear Principal, San Diego Please send your NY CLE forms or questions about the webinar to marketing at lundberg@fr.com. A replay of the webinar will be available for viewing at fr.com 37

Copyright 2017 Fish & Richardson P.C. These materials may be considered advertising for legal services under the laws and rules of professional conduct of the jurisdictions in which we practice. The material contained in this presentation has been gathered by the lawyers at Fish & Richardson P.C. for informational purposes only, is not intended to be legal advice and does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Legal advice of any nature should be sought from legal counsel. Unsolicited e-mails and information sent to Fish & Richardson P.C. will not be considered confidential and do not create an attorney-client relationship with Fish & Richardson P.C. or any of our attorneys. Furthermore, these communications and materials may be disclosed to others and may not receive a response. If you are not already a client of Fish & Richardson P.C., do not include any confidential information in this message. For more information about Fish & Richardson P.C. and our practices, please visit www.fr.com. #1 Patent Litigation Firm (Corporate Counsel, 2004 2016) 38