TABLE OF CONTENTS. Part I: Background and Regulatory Framework. Part II: MDUFMA, 510(k) and Validation

Similar documents
For purposes of this subpart:

Subtitle F Medical Device Innovations

CENTER FOR DEVICES AND RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH (CDRH)

Center for Devices and Radiological Health Appeals Processes: Questions and Answers About 517A

21 CFR Part 50 - Protection of Human Subjects

Potential Effects of 2016 Elections on Medical Device Industry

Internal Agency Review of Decisions; Requests for Supervisory Review of Certain. Decisions Made by the Center for Devices and Radiological Health

21 USC 360c. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

POLICY AND PROCEDURES OFFICE OF THE CENTER DIRECTOR. Drug Safety Oversight Board (DSB) Table of Contents

WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION

21 USC 360i. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

FDA REFORM LEGISLATION Its Effect on Animal Drugs TABLE OF CONTENTS

SAFE IMPORTATION OF MEDICAL PRODUCTS AND OTHER RX THERAPIES ACT OF 2004 (SAFE IMPORT ACT) SECTION-BY-SECTION SEC. 1. SHORT TITLE.

The Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA): History, Reauthorization in 2007, and Effect on FDA Summary In 1992, Congress passed the Prescription Drug

Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997: Modifications to the List of

Citation to Code of Federal Regulations and statutory citation (as applicable):

Formal Dispute Resolution: Appeals Above the Division Level Guidance for Industry and Review Staff

GUIDELINE FOR AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVES

PART I PRELIMINARY MATTERS

21 USC 350h. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

FDA WARNING LETTERS. FDA s Warning Letter Process and How to Respond

Coronary, Peripheral, and Neurovascular Guidewires--Performance Tests and

Jason Foscolo, Esq. (631) Food Safety Modernization Act Enforcement Prepared by Lauren Handel, Esq.

Refurbishing, Reconditioning, Rebuilding, Remarketing, Remanufacturing, and Servicing of

Food Recalls and Other FDA Administrative Enforcement Actions

Annual Report on the Collection of Emergency Room Data. As Required By SB 1, the General Appropriations Act of the 83 rd Legislature, DSHS Rider 93

MDS - G3 GUIDANCE FOR MEDICAL DEVICE AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES ANNEX II:

Indirect Food Additives: Adhesives and Components of Coatings. SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is amending the food additive

TITLE III--IMPROVING THE SAFETY OF IMPORTED FOOD

Reprocessing/Refurbishing Regulated. Responsibilities of Manufacturers, Users and the Regulator. Emily Larose, Stuart English &

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is issuing a final rule that adopts,

Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Attention: Scott Tomsky Vice President, U.S. Generics Regulatory Affairs 425 Privet Road Horsham, PA 19044

MEDICAL DEVICE ISSUES IN HEALTH CARE FRAUD CASES

Table of Contents Introduction and Background II. Statutory Authority III. Need for the Amendments IV. Reasonableness of the Amendments

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. ALEXIS DEGELMANN, et al., ADVANCED MEDICAL OPTICS INC.,

National Research Council Canada (NRC)

Health Information Technology Provisions in the Recovery Act

Subpart A General Provisions PART 7 ENFORCEMENT POLICY. 21 CFR Ch. I ( Edition)

Laser Products--Conformance with IEC Ed. 3 and IEC Ed. 3.1 (Laser

Clarification of When Products Made or Derived from Tobacco Are Regulated as Drugs,

State of Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation Division of Drugs, Devices, and Cosmetics

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION. 10 CFR Part 72 [NRC ] RIN 3150-AJ47. List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks:

H. R. ll. To increase competition in the pharmaceutical industry. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES A BILL

DRAFT AGENDA. AAMI ST/WG 92, Process Challenge Devices Working Group 30 April 2015 (9 a.m. to 12 p.m.) Annapolis, Maryland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEV ADA. consented to the entry of this Consent Decree of Permanent Injunction (the "Decree"), without

MEMORANDUM. Joseph A. Levitt Elizabeth Barr Fawell. Date: December 21, Congress Passes Landmark Food Safety Legislation

Chapter One. Section I. General provisions

Assembly Bill No. 602 CHAPTER 139

POCKET REFERENCE DRUG SAMPLE DISTRIBUTION: SELECT FEDERAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS

Case 1:12-cv RBW Document 9 Filed 12/03/12 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 5:14-cv JLV Document 138 Filed 10/06/15 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: 1868

Case 4:18-cv KGB Document 30 Filed 04/19/18 Page 1 of 21

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Amendments to Regulations on Citizen Petitions, Petitions for Stay of Action, and Submission of

Working Draft of Proposed Rules (Redline Version)

United States. Country QUESTIONNAIRE

Regulatory Requirements for Hearing Aid Devices and Personal Sound Amplification Products;

State Attorney General Investigations and Litigation. Barry H. Boise November 3, 2011

HOGAN & HARTSON APR -9 P4 :18 BY HAND DELIVERY

42 USC NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

The Consumer Healthcare Products Association (CHPA) submits these. comments on the proposal published by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 64

Hot Topics for Assisted Living

Amended proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

HOUSE AMENDMENT Bill No. HB 5511 (2012) Amendment No. CHAMBER ACTION

SUBCHAPTER B PROCEDURAL RULES

July 22, Summary: This letter summarizes the final regulations implementing statutory changes to the Clery Act.

Criminal Liability For Food Safety Violations: Jensen Farms and the FDA s Heightened Enforcement Efforts

October 15, 2018 Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, Room 1061 Rockville, MD 20852

WASHINGTON UPDATE: THE GOOD, THE BAD & THE UGLY TODAY S AGENDA 2/28/2017 GAMES 2017 WINTER MEETING FEBRUARY 17, 2017

Rules Update-SWMP. July 16, 2018

11 Obtaining Informed Consent from Research Subjects

NEXT DECADE TO-DO: Enforce Preemption for Class II Devices with Special Controls. Luther T. Munford and Erin P. Lane

Administrative and Penal Responsibility for Violations of Medical Device Marketing Regulations

A Bill Regular Session, 2017 HOUSE BILL 1026

HP0557, LD 821, item 2, 124th Maine State Legislature, Amendment C "A", Filing Number H-625, Sponsored by

REACH The new Chemicals Regulation. Maria do Carmo Palma, 7 th November, C3P-NASA Workshop

IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE

TITLE XXX OCCUPATIONS AND PROFESSIONS

Guidance for Industry

The Food Safety Enhancement Act: Adjusting Food Safety Procedures for the 21 st Century

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 993 and House Bill No.

University of California, Irvine Human Research Protections Standard Operating Policies and Procedures

NCSL SUMMARY P.L (HR 4472)

E U C O P E S y n o p s i s

Health Care Compliance Association

The authority for the Department of Public Health to promulgate 105 CMR is found in: M.G.L. c. 111, ' ' 5I, 5N, 5O, and 5P.

Litigation Webinar Series. Hatch-Waxman 101. Chad Shear Principal, San Diego

on significant health issues pertaining to their products, and of encouraging the

Criteria Used to Order Administrative Detention of Food for Human or Animal

Model Expedited Scheduling of Controlled Substances Act

FDA APPEALS IMPROVING YOUR ODDS OF SUCCESS: TRENDS, EXPECTATIONS, STRATEGIES. Jeffrey Shapiro

PRESCRIPTION MONITORING PROGRAM MODEL ACT 2010 Revision

Important Regulatory Developments: FDA's Reportable Food Registry and Other Reporting Obligations

PUBLIC LAW JULY 30, STAT. 745

FDA ADVISORY. President Signs Sweeping Food Safety Reform. Title I. January 5, 2011

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SERC Regional Standards Development Procedure Exhibit C to the Amended and Restated Regional Entity Delegation Agreement between

To improve the Freedom of Information Act.

Supreme Court Invites Solicitor General s View on Safe Harbor of the Hatch-Waxman Act

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions. hb e1

Transcription:

TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction to Reusing Single-Use Devices................................ ix Part I: Background and Regulatory Framework Section 1................................................................. 3 Guidance for FDA Staff and Industry Sec. 300.500 Reprocessing of Single-Use Devices, March 18, 2005 This guidance document lists and explains regulations that reprocessors of single-use devices (SUDs) must comply with. Section 2................................................................ 11 Reprocessed Single-Use Device Timeline The timeline lists requirements, action dates and actions needed by reprocessors of SUDs under the Medical Device User Fee and Modernization Act (MDUFMA) of 2002 (amended 2007). Section 3................................................................ 17 Reprocessing of Single-Use Devices; Frequently Asked Questions This document provides answers to questions regarding topics such as: selection of third-party reprocessor, the Medical Device Reporting (MDR) system, the quality system (QS), sterilization, specific devices, and registration and device listing. Section 4................................................................ 25 Definitions These definitions provide the meaning of key terms related to the reprocessing of SUDs. Part II: MDUFMA, 510(k) and Validation Section 5................................................................ 31 Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff: Compliance with Section 301 of the Medical Device User Fee and Modernization Act of 2002, as amended Prominent and Conspicuous Mark of Manufacturers on Single-Use Devices, May 2006 Section 301 of MDUFMA amended Section 502 of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) to require a device to bear the name of the manufacturer. This guidance document includes definitions, explains how the provision applies to SUDs, how to know whether a manufacturer s mark is prominent and conspicuous, and when a reprocessor should place its mark on a device. It also includes a flow chart to help reprocessors decide whether to place their mark on the device, use a detachable label or use an attachment. iii

iv REUSING SINGLE-USE DEVICES Section 6................................................................ 45 Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff Medical Device User Fee and Modernization Act of 2002, Validation Data in Premarket Notification Submissions (510(k)s) for Reprocessed Single-Use Medical Devices, September 2006 [amended 2007, see Section 14] This guidance document describes the types of validation the FDA recommends to be submitted under 510(k) of the FDCA. It also provides guidance on submission and review procedures for validation. The FDA also offers definitions, a question-andanswer section on the MDUFMA 510(k) requirements, an overview of validation data and information on the reprocessing procedure, such as cleaning, packaging and sterilization. Section 7................................................................ 65 Medical Devices; Reprocessed Single-Use Devices; Requirement for Submission of Validation Data, Federal Register, Sept. 25, 2006 The Federal Register announced that the FDA was amending classification regulations for reprocessed SUDs whose exemption from 510(k) had been terminated. It provides background, definitions, explains critical and semicritical devices, and outlines how the final rulemaking amends specific regulations. Section 8............................................................... 93 Medical Devices; Reprocessed Single-Use Devices; Requirement for Submission of Validation Data; Withdrawal, Federal Register, Jan. 12, 2007 The FDA announced its withdrawal of the direct final rule on classification regulations for reprocessed SUDs, citing adverse event comments. Section 9................................................................ 97 The Medical Device User Fee and Modernization Act of 2002 [amended 2007, see Section 14] This law amends the FDCA to improve regulations for devices. The regulation, which states that Congress finds prompt approval is critical, includes definitions, the authority to assess and use device fees, amendments regarding the regulations of devices, such as inspections, penalties and labeling, additional amendments for SUDS in Section 302 and information about premarket notification. Section 10.............................................................. 151 The Medical Device User Fee and Modernization Act of 2002 FAQs [amended 2007, see Section 14] The FDA answers questions regarding the background of MDUFMA, user fees (including charts), user fee billing issues, third-party inspections, reprocessed SUDs and postmarket surveillance.

Table of Contents v Section 11.............................................................. 165 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the Status of Reprocessed Single-Use Devices (SUDs) that Receive a Not Substantially Equivalent (NSE) Letter, November 2004 This guidance document explains what NSE means and the circumstances and responsibilities regarding such a letter. Section 12.............................................................. 173 Updated 510(k) Sterility Review Guidance K90-1; Final Guidance for Industry and FDA, August 2002 This guidance document provides background about the QS, Blue Book Memorandum K97 regarding changes to existing devices and the enactment of the FDA Modernization Act of 1997 (FDAMA). It also explains methods of sterilization, review procedures for all sterilization methods and additional procedures for 510(k)s. Section 13.............................................................. 183 Summary of the Medical Device User Fee and Modernization Act of 2002, November 2004 This summary outlines the Medical Device User Fee and Modernization Act of 2002 (amended 2007), highlighting key features of the law, and providing information about review fees, third-party inspections, reprocessed SUDs and additional provisions. Section 14............................................................. 213 Title II Medical Device User Fee Amendments of 2007 This legislation, which is Title II of the FDA Amendments Act of 2007, reauthorized MDUFMA. It became law Sept. 30, 2007. The legislation renews user fees to be paid by device companies. It reduces some application fees and creates new annual fees: an establishment registration fee and a fee for filing periodic reports. Part III: FDA Action and Strategy Section 15.............................................................. 239 Executive Summary Open Meeting: FDA s Proposed Strategy on Reuse of Single- Use Devices, December 1999 This summary documents the open meeting during which the FDA stated its recognition of the subject s complexity. The meeting was held to hear what various parties affected by SUDs think about the issue. Speakers raised concerns about SUDs and discussed the general thought that the use of reprocessesd SUDs is solely for economic reasons. The FDA s plan to make risk the primary focus of its regulatory approach also was discussed. Section 16.............................................................. 251 Center for Devices and Radiological Health Proposed Strategy to Address the Reuse of Medical Devices Currently Labeled, or Otherwise Intended, for Only One Use This provides background on SUDs and outlines the requirements reprocessed SUDs are subject to in the FDCA and the Code of Federal Regulations.

vi REUSING SINGLE-USE DEVICES Section 17.............................................................. 263 Single-Use Medical Devices: Little Available Evidence of Harm From Reuse, but Oversight Warranted, June 2000 GAO report The Government Accountability Office (GAO) reviewed SUD reprocessing and outlines its findings about various issues related to reprocessed SUDs, such as cost savings, different types of devices, the frequency of reprocessing, possibility of safely reprocessing, difficulties with the policy and requirements for reprocessors. Section 18.............................................................. 289 Statement by David Feigal, then CDRH director, before the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, June 27, 2000 Feigal discusses the FDA s reexamination of its SUDs policy, its efforts and available tools to ensure protection of public health. The statement provides background, the scope of reuse, agency involvement in reuse (research, reports of patient injuries and outreach), the FDA s current policy, the agency s proposed strategy regarding enforcement priorities and the steps that were planned, such as final guidance documents, collaboration and phased-in enforcement. Section 19.............................................................. 301 Reuse of Single-Use Devices, Medical Device Reporting, 1999 This article provides some background on the reprocessing of SUDs and discusses how the increasing use of SUDs heightened concerns about patient safety and equitable regulations. It provides examples of the FDA s list of frequently reprocessed SUDs and addresses the FDA s current policy and proposed strategy. Section 20.............................................................. 307 Statement by Daniel Schultz, CDRH director, before the House Committee on Government Reform, Sept. 26, 2006 Schultz told the committee that the FDA has many tools to ensure safe and effective reprocessed SUDs. He discussed the regulations regarding SUD devices that have been cleared for reprocessing, the changes under MDUFMA (such as the creation of the premarket report), premarket review of reprocessed SUDs, statistics about premarket (510(k)) submissions, compliance activities, postmarket surveillance and ongoing FDA activities. Part IV: Compliance and Enforcement Section 21.............................................................. 319 FDA Letter to Hospitals, Enforcement of FDA Requirements on Reprocessing of Single-Use Devices, April 23, 2001 This letter announced the requirement that hospitals that reprocess SUDs must meet the same requirements as the original product manufacturer. It summarizes the requirements and provides a timetable of enforcement. The letter also outlines the regulatory enforcement actions the FDA is authorized to take for violations.

Table of Contents vii Section 22.............................................................. 325 FDA Letter to Hospitals, Changes in Enforcement of FDA Requirements on Reprocessing of Single-Use Devices, Sept. 25, 2001 This letter told hospitals of the FDA s extension of its deadline for enforcement of postmarket requirements medical device reporting, tracking, corrections and recalls, QS and labeling for hospitals to Aug. 14, 2002. The document outlines the phased-in enforcement of requirements. It also provides examples of completed registration and device listing forms, where to obtain forms and how to complete and submit registration and listing forms. Section 23.............................................................. 333 Frequently-Asked-Questions about the Reprocessing and Reuse of Single-Use Devices by Third-Party and Hospital Reprocessors; Final Guidance for Industry and Staff, July 2001 This guidance document clarifies the August 2000 document Enforcement Priorities for Single-Use Devices Reprocessed by Third Parties and Hospitals. It includes questions to ask a potential reprocessor. The guidance also covers requirements for reporting an adverse event with a reprocessed SUD, QS and SUD compliance, sterilization and the list of SUDs known to be reprocessed. Section 24.............................................................. 345 Frequently-Asked-Questions about the Reprocessing and Reuse of Single-Use Devices by Third-Party and Hospital Reprocessors; Three Additional Questions; Final Guidance for Industry and Staff, July 2003 This document answers questions regarding registration and listing. Section 25.............................................................. 353 Enforcement Priorities for Single-Use Devices Reprocessed by Third Parties and Hospitals, August 2000 This document provides guidance about responsibilities for SUD reprocessors. It includes a background of the use of and regulatory framework surrounding reprocessed SUDs. The guidance document summarizes the FDA s priorities for enforcing premarket submission requirements regarding registration and listing, MDR, device tracking, corrections and removals, QS regulations, labeling and premarket requirements. It also includes comments the agency received after releasing its proposed strategy. Section 26.............................................................. 375 Reusing Medical Devices Ensuring Safety The Second Time Around, FDA Consumer magazine, September-October 2000 This article covers the FDA s concerns, the MDR system, the CDRH research program that explored the safety of reprocessed SUDs and the August 2000 guidance document on enforcement priorities. It also discusses whether the FDA s approach for enforcement of regulatory requirements is appropriate.

viii REUSING SINGLE-USE DEVICES Section 27.............................................................. 381 Guidance Document for Washers and Washer-Disinfectors Intended for Processing Reusable Medical Devices, June 1998 This document is intended to clarify the regulatory status of washers and washerdisinfectors for use in processing reusable devices. It discusses when 510(k) submissions are required, which articles are exempt from 510(k) and addresses confusion about unclassified devices. Section 28.............................................................. 389 Guidance on Adverse Event Reporting for Hospitals That Reprocess Devices Intended by the Original Equipment Manufacturer for Single Use, April 2001 Hospitals that reprocess SUDs are subject to reporting requirements in 21 CFR Part 803 for adverse events involving SUDs. This guidance document describes MDR requirements and provides guidance on the mandatory MedWatch form. Section 29.............................................................. 411 Labeling Recommendations for Single-Use Devices Reprocessed by Third Parties and Hospitals; Final Guidance for Industry and FDA, July 2001 Manufacturers engaged in reprocessing devices are subject to regulatory requirements. This guidance document defines label and labeling and includes a question-and-answer section on labeling requirements. Section 30.............................................................. 423 Labeling Reusable Medical Devices for Reprocessing in Healthcare Facilities: FDA Reviewer Guidance, April 1996 This guidance document, which says it will be updated because it was written before the Good Guidance practices, includes recommendations regarding the content of reuse instructions. It also covers premarket notification submissions, reprocessing steps, labeling, documentation of validation and a checklist for reprocessing instruction.