Business Ethics. Lecture Two :: Doing Ethics Utilitarianism - The Consequences. 4BSc IT :: CT436 Sorcha Uí Chonnachtaigh

Similar documents
J.S. Mill, Utilitarianism (1863)

Chapter Two: Normative Theories of Ethics

Consider Ethics: Theory, Readings, and Contemporary Issues Third Edition Bruce N. Waller. Copyright 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Utilitarianism Revision Help Pack

The Standard of Utility. What makes an action right?

Phil 115, June 13, 2007 The argument from the original position: set-up and intuitive presentation and the two principles over average utility

Utilitarianism and business ethics

Lecture 17 Consequentialism. John Stuart Mill Utilitarianism Mozi Impartial Caring

Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism. Dr. Clea F. Rees. Centre for Lifelong Learning Cardiff University.

Utilitarianism. John Stuart Mill

Lecture 7 Act and Rule Utilitarianism. Based on slides 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley

Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism. Dr. Clea F. Rees. Centre for Lifelong Learning Cardiff University.

Running Head: The Consequentialism Debate 1. The Consequentialism Debate. Student s Name. Course Name. Course Title. Instructors name.

II. Bentham, Mill, and Utilitarianism

Handout 6: Utilitarianism

Bioethics: Autonomy and Health (Fall 2012) Laura Guidry-Grimes

Apple Inc. vs FBI A Jurisprudential Approach to the case of San Bernardino

Utilitarian Ethics and Counselor Decision-Making

Olsen JA (2009): Principles in Health Economics and Policy, Oxford University Press, Oxford. Lecture 4: Equality & Fairness.

I. Identify and or Define. III. Games and Puzzles

BB315014S Sustainable Management Futures 27 MARCH 2012

VII. Aristotle, Virtue, and Desert

Utilitarian Moral Theory: Parallels between a Sport Organization and Society

Consequentialist Ethics

John Stuart Mill ( ) Branch: Political philosophy ; Approach: Utilitarianism Over his own body and mind, the individual is sovereign

Ethical Basis of Welfare Economics. Ethics typically deals with questions of how should we act?

Jeremy Bentham ( )

Repetition on Virtue Ethics. Virtue Ethics. The Seven Virtues

Ethics Handout 18 Rawls, Classical Utilitarianism and Nagel, Equality

Utilitarianism. Introduction and Historical Background. The Defining Characteristics of Utilitarianism

Introduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110W Spring 2012 Russell Marcus

Sport as a Medium for Supporting Global Problem Solving

Full file at

Plato s Concept of Justice: Prepared by, Mr. Thomas G.M., Associate Professor, Pompei College Aikala DK

DOWNLOAD OR READ : UTILITARIANISM SOLUTIONS MEANING PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI

I. Identify and or Define. III. Diagrams, Games, and Puzzles. II. Matching exercise: link the following philosophers with their ideas.

Topic 1: Moral Reasoning and ethical theory

CLASSICAL SCHOOL OF CRIMINOLOGY NONSO ROBERT ATTOH FACULTY OF LAW UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA DEC. 2016

enforce people s contribution to the general good, as everyone naturally wants to do productive work, if they can find something they enjoy.

Phil 115, May 24, 2007 The threat of utilitarianism

Supererogation for Utilitarianism 1

Consequentialism the family of ethical

But priority problem: how do you decide in conflicts of principles

Governing Sport Morally through Policy Grounded in Utilitarianism

Aristotle ( BCE): First theorist of democracy. PHIL 2011 Semester II

PHLB16H3S POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY: ANCIENT GREECE AND MIDDLE AGES STUDY QUESTIONS (II): ARISTOTLE S POLITICS. A. Short Answer Questions

Aristotle (Odette) Aristotle s Nichomachean Ethics

What s the Right Thing To Do?

Introduction to Rawls on Justice and Rawls on utilitarianism. For THEORIES OF JUSTICE USD Fall, 2008 Richard Arneson

Questions. Hobbes. Hobbes s view of human nature. Question. What justification is there for a state? Does the state have supreme authority?

Hobbes. Questions. What justification is there for a state? Does the state have supreme authority? What limits are there upon the state?

Ethical Theories CSC 301 Spring 2018 Howard Rosenthal

C H A P T E R THEORETICAL BACKGROUND. certain theories, which have been developed by persons of legal authorities

MLL110 LEGAL PRINCIPLES & SKILLS EXAM NOTES. problems

BLACKBOARD NOTES ON ON LIBERTY, CHAPTER 1 Philosophy 166 Spring, 2006

Integrating Ethics and Altruism with Economics. David Colander. December 2004 MIDDLEBURY COLLEGE ECONOMICS DISCUSSION PAPER NO.

Chinese University of Hong Kong Second Lecture 2017 Jonathan Jacobs John Jay College of Criminal Justice/CUNY

Criminal Justice Without Moral Responsibility: Addressing Problems with Consequentialism Dane Shade Hannum

Dr. Mohammad O. Hamdan

Study on the Meaning of Lex Voluntatisin the Choice of Law in International Private Law

Utility, Character, and Mill's Argument for Representative Government

POL 343 Democratic Theory and Globalization February 11, "The history of democratic theory II" Introduction

Modern Political Thinkers and Ideas

Environmental Ethics and Philosophy

Mary Wollstonecraft. Egalitarianism. Polanyi Wollstonecraft Review

I. Rocco s Critique of Liberalism, Democracy and Socialism

EMBRACING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IS AN ETHICAL DECISION

EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP BY CAPACITIES OF VIRTUES: A NEW ANALYSIS OF POWER OF POLITICAL LEADERSHIP IN CONFUCIAN PERSPECTIVE

A conception of human rights is meant to play a certain role in global political

Poverty--absolute and relative Inequalities of income and wealth

Antifederalist No. 84. On the Lack of a Bill of Rights

University of Texas Gov 314 (38580)/CTI 303 (33895)

Political Science Legal Studies 217 IMPACT OF LAW

2007 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works.

ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING

Cambridge University Press The Cambridge Rawls Lexicon Edited by Jon Mandle and David A. Reidy Excerpt More information

The Politics of Jurisprudence: Liberty and Equality in Rawls and Dworkin

PHI 1700: Global Ethics

Review: Xiaobo Zhai and Michael Quinn eds., Bentham's Theory of Law and Public. Opinion, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. xi

Chapter 02 Business Ethics and the Social Responsibility of Business

The Justification of Human Rights

What s Wrong With J.S. Mill s Harm-to-Others -Principle?

POLI 342: MODERN WESTERN POLITICAL THOUGHT

Can Negative Utilitarianism be Salvaged?

Canadian Journal of Philosophy

Justice as Fairness and the American Welfare Reform Debate

The Industrial Revolution. A new era in human history

1 This essay uses a 1910 edition of Mill s original.

Deconstructing and Reconstructing Hobbes

History of Social Choice and Welfare Economics

Thoughts towards a Clarification of Evangelium vitae #73

A NEW PARADIGMA OF THE ECONOMICAL AGENT. FROM ADAM SMITH S HOMO ECONOMICUS TO HOMO GENEROSUS BASED ON SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

Elliston and Martin: Whistleblowing

Justice, fairness and Equality. foundation and profound influence on the determination and administration of morality. As such,

The Debate over Utilitarianism

ARISTOTLE S POLITICS :

Speech by H.E. Marie-Louise Coleiro Preca, President of Malta. Formal Opening Sitting of the 33rd Session of the Joint Parliamentary Assembly ACP-EU

DOWNLOAD PDF JUSTICE, POLITICAL LIBERALISM, AND UTILITARIANISM

Law as a form of justice

Understanding democracy (LOI)

Transcription:

Business Ethics Lecture Two :: Doing Ethics Utilitarianism - The Consequences 4BSc IT :: CT436 Sorcha Uí Chonnachtaigh

Overview Theoretical What is a teleological theory? Utilitarianism: Principle of Utility Concept of human nature in Utilitarianism Difficulties with Util. ethics Practical Group work - IT application Fill in PA form, remember name and student ID Discussion 2

Introduction: Utilitarianism Util. is a normative theory: addresses the right and wrong of human action Utilitarianism most popular late 18 th century till late 19 th century Main proponents: J. Bentham, J.S. Mill and Henry Sidgwick Teleological: from Greek word telos, meaning end/goal (ultimate purpose) Utilitarianism is a teleological theory because it aims at an end, that end being happiness Also referred to as a consequentialist theory 3

What is Utilitarian Theory? The creed which accepts as the foundation of morals, Utility or the Greatest Happiness Principle, holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. (J.S. Mill) Actions are judged on their consequences and the amount of pleasure/happiness derived by those involved from those consequences The goal/end = greatest happiness of the greatest number 4

Bentham: Concept of Human Nature Psychological Hedonism Hedonism: theory that human beings are motivated only by promotion of pleasure and avoidance of pain Nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure. It is from them alone to point out what we ought to do, as well as what we shall do (Bentham) Ought here indicates that pleasure/pain are not just motivators but define what is morally good/bad Psychological Egoism Egoism: theory that human beings are essentially selfinterested - Bentham held true even for altruism 5

Concept of Human Nature & Utility Principle of Utility: what is right is that which promotes the greatest happiness Utility is not referring to the usefulness of actions but the extent to which an action promotes the good (happiness) Hedonistic util - variety of experiences = pleasure and some more contemporary utilitarians are described as pluralists because they identify other intrinsic values besides pleasure such as courage, honesty, friendship and knowledge GH Principle applies to every single action - an action which involves heroic sacrifice but fails to increase the general happiness is morally wrong 6

Mill s Utilitarianism Bentham: society is an artificial construct Mill: society = more meaningful Mill s concept of human nature centred on basic desire, in all persons, for unity and harmony with fellow human beings Mill placed more value in social feelings than individual interests - we naturally have human compassion, hence the desire for the GH of greatest number 7

Main features of Util. & Business Maximisation of the good (happiness) = maximisation of production (min. of resources) - economic efficiency Maximisation = instrumental good What is intrinsic good in Util.? That which is good in itself - happiness (Bentham & Mill) For some, happiness can be constituted in a plurality of values: friendship, health, freedom from pain, knowledge, beauty In business: profit, expansion, distribution of rewards, contribution to economy = plural values 8

4 Types of Utilitarianism 1. Act Util: simple and straightforward Must judge each action on its outcome/results alone. With a choice between two courses of action we are morally obliged to take the one that yields the most happiness for the most people Prob: could permit child labour 1. Rule Util: attempts to resolve the moral loop hole in act utilitarianism Must not assess individual acts but the utility of a rule for action. We should judge an act like so: if everyone were to obey this rule, would the general happiness be maximised? Prob: often means inflicting pain on those immediately involved 9

3. Negative Util: focused on promoting the least amount of evil (or harm) for the greatest no. Must choose actions which will cause least harm to others Prob: effective minimimalisation of pain = quickest most painless death for all humankind 4. Preference Util: defines the good to be maximised as the fulfilment of people s preferences Right action = that which produces the best consequences - best consequences are those that satisfy personal preferences Can be a variety of goods/values besides pleasure Prob: Subjectivity preferences could incl. paedophilia, fraud, homophobia, sexism, etc. 10

Issues in business Bluffing Act util. would allow it if it increases the happiness for the majority of people involved (numerous stockholders v. small number of deceived customers?) Rule util. may also allow it if it is an act that could be made a rule - bluffing often presumed by both businesses and customers Tax evasion Act util. may allow it, say if the funds were directed to charities Rule util. would not allow it, as the rule if applied would decrease the overall happiness of all 11

Potential Problems 1. Utilitarianism, generally, is based on the goal of the greatest happiness - problem is measuring happiness so you can be sure to achieve it Better to be a satisfied pig than a dissatisfied Socrates? Pleasure/happiness is neutral? The happiness of a sadist and an altruist are equal in util. 2. Calculating alternative actions and possible consequences = impractical V 12

Potential Problems Cont. 4. GH of greatest number places minorities at a severe disadvantage - slavery could be justified? 5. Sacrifice of some human beings is sometimes required for the sake of others - contrary to intuition that all humans have inviolable intrinsic value 6. Consequential focus of util. neglects the importance of motives and intention 13

Glossary of key terms Teleological: a theory which aims at an end Normative ethical theory: theory that addresses the question of which actions are right, and which are wrong Utility: the Greatest Happiness Psychological Hedonism: acting always to promote pleasure and avoid pain Psychological Egoism: acting always to promote self-interests 14