COMPLAINT FOR DESIGN PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. COMPLAINT and Jury Demand

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff Case No.: 1:17-cv-6236 COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.

Case 3:14-cv RS-EMT Document 1 Filed 03/28/14 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISON COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 1:07-cv MRB Document 6 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/01/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:08-cv WMS Document 1 Filed 12/08/08 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, The Green Pet Shop Enterprises, LLC ( Green Pet Shop or. Plaintiff ), by and through its attorneys, THE RANDO LAW FIRM P.C.

Case 1:16-cv AKH Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 21. Case No.

Case 1:10-cv GMS Document 1-3 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 71 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 3:16-cv MEJ Document 1 Filed 06/16/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/24/10 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION INTEX RECREATION CORP.,

Case 1:11-cv LPS Document 14 Filed 01/30/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 59 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) Case No. PARTIES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 8:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:1

Case 2:14-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 09/12/14 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:17-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 2:13-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 1 of 16

Case 2:17-cv EJF Document 2 Filed 10/02/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND. v. C.A. No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT AND TRADE DRESS INFRINGEMENT. Nature of the Action

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:15-cv-590 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:15-cv RSM Document 1 Filed 05/01/15 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 1:99-mc Document 417 Filed 05/23/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/31/17 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/15/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:11-cv ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case: 1:17-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/15/17 1 of 12. PageID #: 1

Case 1:08-cv Document 1 Filed 10/13/2008 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Courthouse News Service

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 06/22/10 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

Case 2:17-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 04/13/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Case 3:17-cv JCH Document 1 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Case No.

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 10/02/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1

Case 3:15-cv AA Document 1 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:15-cv RSM Document 1 Filed 05/01/15 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN GREEN BAY DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:18-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/20/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) Plaintiff,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 10/10/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 01/26/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1

Case 8:17-cv EAK-JSS Document 114 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID 2433 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, C.A. No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/24/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 2:16-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 15

Case 1:15-cv WMS-LGF Document 54 Filed 11/01/16 Page 1 of 8. COMPLAINT Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:15-cv WMS

Case: 5:09-cv DDD Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/04/09 1 of 5. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

3 James A. McDaniel (Bar No ) 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 4:10-cv Y Document 23 Filed 04/21/10 Page 1 of 8 PageID 156

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 1:11-cv RMC Document 1 Filed 08/20/10 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv JLL-JAD Document 1 Filed 05/12/17 Page 1 of 17 PageID: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 12/08/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. Jonathan E. Singer (pro hac vice to be filed) 60 South 6 th Street, Suite 3200 Minneapolis, MN

Case 2:14-cv JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 227

Case 2:14-cv SPC-CM Document 1 Filed 03/28/14 Page 1 of 12 PageID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/25/16 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/02/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case: 1:11-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/10/11 Page 1 of 19 PageID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case 1:15-cv CW Document 2 Filed 01/16/15 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:13-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 07/09/13 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 5:14-cv Document 1 Filed 11/06/14 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:1

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-381 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Transcription:

Case :-cv-0-svw-agr Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 Guy Ruttenberg, Bar No. 0 guy@ruttenbergiplaw.com Dennis Ma, Bar No. dennis@ruttenbergiplaw.com RUTTENBERG IP LAW, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 0 Century Park East, Suite 0 Los Angeles, CA 00 Telephone: (0) -0 Facsimile: (0) -0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LEDSON, a Polish Company, and LUMINII CORP., an Illinois corporation, v. Plaintiffs, VISION LIGHT WORX, INC., a California corporation, d/b/a Optic Arts, Defendant. Case No. :-cv- COMPLAINT FOR DESIGN PATENT INFRINGEMENT JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Case :-cv-0-svw-agr Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 Plaintiffs LEDsON and Luminii Corp. ("Plaintiffs") complain and allege as follows against Defendant Vision Light Worx, Inc. d/b/a Optic Arts ("Defendant"). THE PARTIES. LEDsON is a family business established in 00 in Warsaw, Poland and has become a leading manufacturer of aluminum profiles for Light Emitting Diode (LED) fixtures. LEDsOn has created numerous designs for extrusions for LED-based lighting devices.. LEDsON has a place of business at ul. Obroncow Tobruku /0, 0- Warsaw, Poland.. Luminii is a manufacturer of specification grade architecral LED lighting products, organized under the laws of the State of Illinois, and has a place of business at Merrimac Ave, Niles, IL 0.. Upon information and belief, Vision Light Worx, Inc. is corporation organized under the laws of the State of California, has a place of business at 0 Monterey Pass Rd., Monterey Park, CA,, and conducts business under the name Optic Arts. JURISDICTION AND VENUE. This is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the United States, U.S.C. et seq. and.. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to U.S.C.. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant because it has committed and continues to commit acts of infringement in violation of U.S.C., and places infringing products into the stream of commerce, with the knowledge or understanding that such products are sold in the State of California, including in this District. The acts by Defendant cause injury to Plaintiffs within this District. Upon information and belief, Defendant derives substantial revenue from the sale of

Case :-cv-0-svw-agr Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 infringing products within this District, expects its actions to have consequences within this District, and derives substantial revenue from interstate commerce. and 00(b). LEDsON.. Venue is proper within this District under U.S.C. (b) and (c) BACKGROUND FACTS. Slawomir Trzesniowski is the managing director and owner of 0. Mr. Trzesniowski has protected his innovative designs through design patents issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The asserted design patents cover many ornamental features of Plaintiffs' products. Patent Number Title D, Extrusion for LED-Based Lighting Apparatus D, Extrusion for LED-Based Lighting Apparatus D, Extrusion for LED-Based Lighting Apparatus D,0 Extrusion for Light Emitting Diode Based Lighting Apparatus D, Extrusion for LED-Based Lighting Apparatus D, Extrusion for LED-Based Lighting Apparatus. LEDsON owns, by way of assignment, each of the asserted design patents listed above, copies of which are attached as Exhibits -.. Luminii is the exclusive licensee in the United States of the asserted LEDsON design patents.. As the side-by-side comparisons shown below reveal, Defendant has misappropriated Plaintiffs' patented LED-based lighting apparatus designs in the accused products.

Case :-cv-0-svw-agr Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 U.S. Design Patent Side Elevation View D, D, Accused Product CHW-S- CHS-R-0 D, CHS-R- D, D,0 CHS-C- CHS-S-0

Case :-cv-0-svw-agr Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 U.S. Design Patent Side Elevation View D, Accused Product CHS-S-. Plaintiff, Luminii, notified Defendant of the asserted design patents by way of a letter addressed to Mr. Jason Mullen, Optic Arts, Chestnut Street, Suite 0, Burbank, California 0, which was mailed on December, 0.. Since receipt of the aforementioned letter, Defendant has continued to manufacture, import, sell and/or offer for sale one or more of the accused products.. Since receipt of the aforementioned letter, Defendant has refused to change its products in response to Plaintiffs' objections, and has refused to discontinue its sales of the accused products.. On information and belief, Defendant, with full knowledge of the asserted design patents and the accused products, has acted with reckless disregard for the asserted design patents. FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Infringement of D,). Plaintiffs incorporate and reallege paragraphs through of this. Defendant has infringed and continues to infringe U.S. Design Patent D, by using, selling and/or offering to sell in the United States, and/or number CHW-S-, which embodies the design covered by U.S. Design Patent D,.

Case :-cv-0-svw-agr Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Infringement of D,) 0. Plaintiffs incorporate and reallege paragraphs through of this. Defendant has infringed and continues to infringe U.S. Design Patent D, by using, selling and/or offering to sell in the United States, and/or number CHS-R-0, which embodies the design covered by U.S. Design Patent D,. THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Infringement of D,). Plaintiffs incorporate and reallege paragraphs through of this. Defendant has infringed and continues to infringe U.S. Design Patent D, by using, selling and/or offering to sell in the United States, and/or number CHS-R-, which embodies the design covered by U.S. Design Patent D,. FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Infringement of D,). Plaintiffs incorporate and reallege paragraphs through of this. Defendant has infringed and continues to infringe U.S. Design Patent D, by using, selling and/or offering to sell in the United States, and/or number CHS-C-, which embodies the design covered by U.S. Design Patent D,.

Case :-cv-0-svw-agr Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 FIFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Infringement of D,0). Plaintiffs incorporate and reallege paragraphs through of this. Defendant has infringed and continues to infringe U.S. Design Patent D,0 by using, selling and/or offering to sell in the United States, and/or number CHS-S-0, which embodies the design covered by U.S. Design Patent D,0. SIXTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Infringement of D,). Plaintiffs incorporate and reallege paragraphs through of this. Defendant has infringed and continues to infringe U.S. Design Patent D, by using, selling and/or offering to sell in the United States, and/or number CHS-S-, which embodies the design covered by U.S. Design Patent D,. patents; PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray for relief as follows:. A judgment that Defendant has infringed each of the asserted design. An order and judgment permanently enjoining Defendant and its officers, directors, agents, servants, employees, affiliates, attorneys, and all others acting in privity or in concert with them, and their parents, subsidiaries, divisions, successors and assigns, from further acts of infringement of the asserted design patents.

Case :-cv-0-svw-agr Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0. A judgment awarding Plaintiffs all damages adequate to compensate for Defendant's infringement of the asserted patents, and particularly Defendant's total profits pursuant to U.S.C... A judgment awarding Plaintiffs all damages, costs, and interest, including treble damages, based on any infringement found to be willful, pursuant to U.S.C., together with prejudgment interest.. An accounting of Defendant's profits.. A judgment declaring this case to be exceptional and awarding Plaintiffs their reasonable attorneys fees pursuant to U.S.C. ; and proper. Awarding Plaintiffs such other and further relief as this Court deems just and DATED: March, 0 By: /s/ Dennis H. Ma Guy Ruttenberg Dennis H. Ma RUTTENBERG IP LAW, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 0 Century Park East, Suite 0 Los Angeles, CA 00 Telephone: (0) -0 Facsimile: (0) -0 guy@ruttenbergiplaw.com dennis@ruttenbergiplaw.com Joseph M. Kuo (pro hac vice to be filed) William T. Eveland (pro hac vice to be filed) ARNSTEIN & LEHR LLP 0 South Riverside Plaza Suite 00 Chicago, IL 00 Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () -0 jmkuo@arnstein.com wteveland@arnstein.com Attorney for Plaintiffs