English 1301/ Angry Men Test

Similar documents
Twelve Angry Men. Reginald Rose

VOCABULARY Define the following words; use a dictionary. The law terms are defined for you.

On the Frequency of Non-Unanimous Felony Verdicts In Oregon. A Preliminary Report to the Oregon Public Defense Services Commission

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE July 2000 Session. STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ROSALIND MARIE JOHNSON and DONNA YVETTE McCOY

STUDENT STUDY GUIDE CHAPTER SIX

No. 51,827-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus ELDRICK DONTRAIL CARTER * * * * *

Pages , Looking Back

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ATHENS COUNTY

Sixth Amendment. Fair Trial

Testimony of Kemba Smith before the Inter American Commission on Human Rights. March 3, 2006

No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2001 MT Mont P.3d 441 STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Respondent,

Legal Definitions: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z A

(a) A person commits the offense of aggravated assault when he or she assaults:

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY INTRODUCTION

Fall, Criminal Litigation 9/4/17. Criminal Litigation: Arraignment to Appeal. How Do We Get A Case?

trial preparation packet

The Criminal Court System. Law 521 Chapter Seven

MURDER, PASSION/PROVOCATION AND AGGRAVATED/RECKLESS MANSLAUGHTER 1 N.J.S.A. 2C:11-3a(1) and (2); 2C:11-4a, b(1) and b(2)

CHARACTERS IN THE COURTROOM

CHAPTER. Criminal Trial. Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458

Learning Station #5 LEVEL ONE-13

STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee, ARMANDO MEDRANO VALENZUELA, Appellant. No. 1 CA-CR and 1 CA-CR (Consolidated)

STATE OF OHIO ROBERT HENDERSON

S12A0623. JACKSON v. THE STATE. Following a jury trial, Cecil Jackson, Jr. appeals his conviction for malice

Hicks v. State of Alabama. Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals Alex Thrasher*

American Government Jury Duty

Circuit Court for Baltimore City Case No IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS

Practice Test. Law & the Courts -1-

COURT OF APPEALS GUERNSEY COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

S18A1394. FAVORS v. THE STATE. a jury found him guilty of malice murder and other crimes in connection with

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Law Day 2016 Courtroom Vocabulary Grades 3-5

No. 43,920-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * *

Pretrial Activities and the Criminal Trial

MOTION FOR REHEARING

S16A1842. GREEN v. THE STATE. Appellant Willie Moses Green was indicted and tried for malice murder

MINNESOTA JUDICIAL TRAINING UPDATE

Defense: Your goal is to convince as many members of the jury as possible that Abigail Williams is innocent of murder. 4 Attorneys

Examination of witnesses

English as a Second Language Podcast ESL Podcast Legal Problems

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No PABLO MELENDEZ, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus

MOCK TRIAL PROCEDURE

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 11-95

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs December 16, 2008

STIPULATED JURY INSTRUCTIONS State v. Manny Rayfield Curr County Circuit Court Case No State of New Maine

Courtroom Roles and Responsibilities

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 19, 2000 Session

SIMPHIWE MABHUTI SONTSHANTSHA JUDGMENT

Guns don t just go off

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 14, 2001 Session

REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT. Julie Ann Epps (MS Bar No. 504 East Peace Street Canton, MS (601) facsimile (601)

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CR. RUTH BARRADAS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Table of Contents. Page 1---Biography, Synopsis. Page 2---Character List. Page 4---Major Themes. Page 6---Glossary of Terms. Page 8 ---Short Summary

1. If several suspected offenders are involved in the same criminal. accusation or indictment, no defense attorney shall be allowed to represent

CASE NO. 1D Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Glen P. Gifford, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 113,880 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, CRAIG W. GUNTHER, Appellant.

COMMONWEALTH'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS

Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Fine and Schudson, JJ.

Supreme Court significantly revised the framework for determining the. 221, 590 P2d 1198 (1979), in light of current scientific research and adopt[ed]

Stephen Meadowcroft QC. Criminal Overview. Clerks Details. Memberships. Call 1973 Silk 2007

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE OF THE COUNTY OF SHASTA PRESS RELEASE NO CRIMINAL CHARGES IN CLUB ICE DEATH. The Facts

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 100,247. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, XAVIER MILLER, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

The Judicial Branch. Three Levels of Courts in the U.S.

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS APPEALS COURT COMMONWEALTH. vs. MICHAEL S. GILL. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28

OFFICER INVOLVED SHOOTING TRIAL REVIEW AND EVALUATION

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE DOMINICK STANIN, SR. Argued: November 9, 2017 Opinion Issued: March 30, 2018

STUDY GUIDE Three Branches Test

Do Capital Jurors Understand Mitigation? Why mitigation? 4/13/2011. Aggravation vs. Mitigation

The Golden Age of Television Drama

OUR DEMOCRATIC RIGHTS YEAR 9 STUDENT POST-VISIT RESOURCE

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 117,718 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, NOAH DEMETRIUS REED, Appellant.

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Court of Appeals of North Carolina. STATE of North Carolina v. Alvaro Rafael CASTILLO. No. COA Decided: July 19, 2011

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed November 9, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Arthur E.

* * * * * * * (COURT COMPOSED OF CHIEF JUDGE JAMES F. MCKAY, III, JUDGE TERRI F. LOVE, JUDGE JOY COSSICH LOBRANO)

v No Wayne Circuit Court

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 01-CF-934. Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia (F )

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE FEBRUARY 1997 SESSION

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

Going to court. A booklet for children and young people who are going to be witnesses at Crown, magistrates or youth court

An Introduction. to the. Federal Public Defender s Office. for the Districts of. South Dakota and North Dakota

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No Filed November 21, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, John D.

SCMF IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No. 17. September Term, 1995 MACK TYRONE BURRELL STATE OF MARYLAND

The Queen. - v - DYLAN JACKSON. Sentencing Remarks of the Hon. Mr. Justice Picken. 10 December 2015

Magruder s American Government

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA. Present: Judges Willis, Annunziata and Senior Judge Coleman Argued at Richmond, Virginia

The defendant has been charged with first degree murder.

CHAPTER 8 The Courtroom Work Group and the Criminal Trial. Teaching Outline. I. Introduction (p.226)

1. The location or site where a criminal offence has taken place is called a(n)?

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE. STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JUMBO KURI

US. CONSTITUTION- RETAKE TEST. Part I: The Constitution: /10

"Tell-Tale Heart" Mock Trial

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs December 5, 2000

Transcription:

Ware 1 English 1301/1302 12 Angry Men Test Name This is an open book test. You may use the text of the play and your notes. You will need a scantron and use the bluebook from before with short answer questions. Definitions Match the term with the definition. 1. Hung Jury A. duty or obligation of the prosecution to demonstrate the defendant s guilt 2. Acquittal B. a person who hates or refuses to accept the members of a particular group (such as a racial or religious group) 3. Fifth Amendment C. agreed to by everyone 4. Sadist D. the act of deciding that a person is not guilty of a crime 5. Conviction E. a crime in which one wrongfully causes the death of another person after rationally considering the timing or method of doing so. 6. Bigot B. guarantees that a person on trial for a criminal offense cannot be forced to testify against himself 7. Unanimous C. uncertainty as to a criminal defendant's guilt 8. 1 st -Degree Murder D. a jury that fails to reach a verdict 9. Reasonable Doubt E. a person who enjoys inflicting pain on others. (Juror THREE is perhaps one.) 10. Burden of Proof C. the act of proving that a person is guilty of a crime in a court of law Act I True/False

Ware 2 If the statement is true, mark it A ; if it is false, mark it B. All answers should be based on the text (not the movie). 11. The play opens in the courtroom. 12. The guard locks the jurors in a room. 13. The jurors decide to discuss the case before they cast a vote. 14. The first vote is by secret ballot. 15. EIGHT votes Not Guilty. 16. The man accused of murder is the spoiled son of a rich man. 17. NINE is an elderly man. 18. A woman riding on a train saw the murder committed. 19. FIVE grew up in the slums. 20. A gun is produced that looks exactly like the murder weapon. Act II Multiple Choice

Ware 3 Choose the best answer. 21. In the 2 nd voting, the result is a. 10 to 1 b. 6 to 6 c. 11 to 1 22. The juror raised in the slums a. calls for a 3 rd vote b. is falsely accused of changing his vote c. attacks another juror. 23. The elderly juror a. votes not guilty b. declares a hung jury c. disqualifies himself 24. The woman said she saw the murder a. through the windows of the train b. on the train c. immediately before the train passed. 25. EIGHT suggests that the elderly witness a. could not have heard the boys threats b. could not have seen the murder c. could not have been riding on the train. 26. One juror suggests that the old man gave false testimony because a. he was bribed b. he was mentally ill c. he needed attention. 27. The juror raised in the slums a. changes his vote b. draws a diagram c. says, I ll kill you. 28. EIGHT questions a. the results of the vote change b. the old man s ability to run c. the accuracy of the diagram. 29. The diagram brought by the guard is of

Ware 4 a. the train b. the woman s bedroom c. the Apartment where the old man lived. 30. EIGHT acts out the part of a. the defendant b. the dead man c. the old man. ACT III - True/False If the statement is true, mark it A ; if it is false, mark it B. All answers should be based on the text (not the movie). 31. The 3 rd vote is evenly split 6 to 6. 32. A hung jury is one which votes for execution. 33. The sadistic juror, THREE, reenacts the stabbing to prove the boy did it. 34. The boy had never been in any previous trouble for using a knife. 35. The juror from the slums knows how to handle a switch-blade. 36. One juror changes his vote to Not Guilty because he is anxious to leave. 37. The 4 th vote is evenly split. 38. The jurors decide that the woman could see as far as she said. 39. THREE never changes his vote of Guilty. 40. The jurors are finally unanimous in a verdict of Not Guilty. Short Answer

Ware 5 Answer the following questions in the space provided. (FIVE Points Each) 41. What is contradictory about these two statements by Juror THREE? He [the old man] said the boy yelled it out. That s enough for me. He s an old man. You saw him. Half the time he was confused. How could he be positive about anything? 46. When talking about the stab wound in Act III, Juror FIVE provides information that discounts raises doubt about the fight. What is it? 51. What does Juror SEVEN s willingness to change his vote suggest about his character?

Ware 6 56. By the end of the play the jurors have raised Reasonable Doubt about the boy s guilt. List THREE things about which the jurors have some doubt. 1. 2. 3.