does not accept this plea agreement, then either the defendant or the government will have the right

Similar documents
Case 3:17-cr HEH Document 11 Filed 07/19/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID# 16

Case 1:17-cr RC Document 3 Filed 12/01/17 Page 1 of 10. United States v. Michael T. Flynn

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

United States v. Biocompatibles, Inc. Criminal Case No.

1. The defendant understands her rights as follows:

Case 3:10-cr FDW Document 3 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION

Case 1:09-mj JMF Document 3 Filed 01/12/2009 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PLEA AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION

GUILTY PLEA and PLEA AGREEMENT8Y:

case 3:04-cr AS document 162 filed 09/01/2005 page 1 of 6

Case 1:17-cr MHC Document 5 Filed 03/20/17 Page 1 of 19

Case 3:17-cr RBL Document 8 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 10 FILED. LDOOED,RECEIVED JUL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

involved in the transaction, full restitution, a special

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, ) v. ) No CR-W-FJG. Defendant.

Background. The Defendant. 1. From in or around 2007 through in or around January 2017,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division PLEA AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT.,Esq.

Case 2:13-cr CLS-HGD Document 6 Filed 08/02/13 Page 1 of 18 AMENDED PLEA AGREEMENT. The Government and defendant, RUTH GAYLE CUNNINGHAM hereby

Case 6:10-cr WEB Document 52 Filed 01/27/11 Page 1 of 12

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

Case 2:12-cr JES-UAM Document 41 Filed 07/01/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID 110

TYPE OF OFFENSE(S) AND SECTION NUMBER(S) LIST OFFENSE(S), CASE NUMBER(S) AND DATE(S) 3. CASE NUMBER(S) AND DATE(S)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. No. CR

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Judges PLEA AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION

Case 1:07-cr JEG-RAW Document 86 Filed 05/20/2009 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA

Zyprexa - Eli Lilly s Guilty Plea Agreement - Document Transcript

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division PLEA AGREEMENT

5 CRWIINAL NO. H

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

FlLED RECEIVED. Case 2:09-cr ROS Document 152 Filed 11/08/10 Page 1 of 8 ~LODGED COPY NOV Ct.ERK US DISTRICT COURT DISTR CT OF A.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. Eastern Division

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

) REDACTED PURSUANT TO Plaintiff, ) E-GOVERNMENT ACT OF 2002

Case 1:18-cr LM Document 2 Filed 07/23/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTWCT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PLEA AGREEMENT

8:15-cr JFB-FG3 Doc # 7 Filed: 04/10/15 Page 1 of 7 - Page ID # 19

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS : CRIMINAL ACTION : NO. GUILTY PLEA COLLOQUY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

Case 3:16-cr BR Document 588 Filed 05/19/16 Page 1 of 5

LIST OFFENSE(S), CASE NUMBER(S) AND DATE(S)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

AT SEA TILE. The United States of America, by and through John McKay, United States Attorney 16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

Case 8:16-cr WGC Document 5 Filed 02/01/16 Page 1 of 7. . U.S. Department of Justice

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL DIVISION COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : : VS. : NO. : :

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

SUPCR 1104 FOR COURT USE ONLY SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ DUI ADVISEMENT OF RIGHTS, WAIVER, AND PLEA FORM. (Vehicle Code 23152)

Attorneys for the United States UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case &:11 cr JMM Document 257 Filed 09/17/12 Page 1 of 12. INTHEUNITEDSTATESDISTRICTCOURT FILED s EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PLEA AGREEMENT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY, MISSOURI AT LIBERTY. STATE OF MISSOURI ) ) Plaintiff ) ) VS ) Case No. ) ) Defendant )

Case 4:11 cr JMM Document 260 Filed 09/17/12 Page U.S. 1 DISTRICT of 12 COURT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) No.

Case 2:15-cr FMO Document 52 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:295

Offense of Conviction

STATE OF MARYLAND * IN THE * CIRCUIT COURT vs. * FOR * * CASE NO.

SUPCR 1106 FOR COURT USE ONLY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Re: United States v. Alfonso Portillo, 09 Cr (RPP)

FILED DEC Q--IL. DecemberJ, 2008

Case 2:12-cr AWA-TEM Document 51 Filed 05/09/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID# 147 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THI

PLEA AGREEMENT THOMAS QUINN

Re: Uníted States u. Carmelinda Marotta, a.h,a. Linda Mørotta

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA. ) No. 3:17-cr TMB ) ) ) ) ) PLEA AGREEMENT

Case 2:14-cr JLL Document 10 Filed 09/03/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 62

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION

COURT RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CHAPTER 12 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Model Annotated Corporate Plea Agreement Last Updated 12/20/2013 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT [XXXXXXX] DISTRICT OF [XXXXXXXXX] ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

Legal Definitions: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z A

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

Circuit Court for Washington County Case No.:17552 UNREPORTED. Fader, C.J., Nazarian, Arthur,

Case 3:16-cr K Document 4 Filed 04/14/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID 6

Case 2:18-cr JPS Filed 03/12/18 Page 1 of 16 Document 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Case 3:06-cr AWT Document 4 Filed 11/22/06 Page 1 of 8

2:13-cr GCS-PJK Doc # 9 Filed 11/05/13 Pg 1 of 19 Pg ID 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION.

Case 4:16-cr RGD-LRL Document 17 Filed 01/31/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID# 41 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

(1) the nature and circumstances of the offense and the history and characteristics of the defendant;

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR

Case 3:17-cr DJH Document 33 Filed 08/15/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 96 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE

APPENDIXD Rules 9.140, 9.200, and 9.900(h) in Column Format

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

United States Attorney District of Connecticut. February 20, 2015

Case 2:09-cr R Document 25 Filed 12/10/2009 Page 1 of 24

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION

Transcription:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : v. : CRIMINAL NO. 14-613 DELVIN BARNES : GUILTY PLEA AGREEMENT Under Rule 11 ofthe Federal Rules ofcriminal Procedure, the government, the defendant, and thedefendant's counsel enter intothe following guilty plea agreement. Any reference to the United States or the government in this agreement shall mean the Office of the United Stales Attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. 1. The defendant agrees to plead guilty to Count One of the Indictment charging him with kidnapping, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1201, arising from the kidnapping ofvictim C.G.F. The defendant further acknowledges his waiver of rights, as set forth in the attachment to this agreement. 2. The parties agree that this plea agreement is made pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(C) and that the following specific sentence is theappropriate disposition of this case: 420 months* imprisonment, a 5-year period ofsupervised release, a fine, if any to bedetermined by the Court, full restitution, and a$100 special assessment. If the Court does not accept this plea agreement, then either the defendant or the government will have the right to withdraw from the plea agreement and insist that the case proceed to trial.

3. At the time ofsentencing, the government will: a. Comment on the evidence and circumstances ofthe case; bring to the Court's attention all facts relevant to sentencing, and to the character and any criminal conduct of the defendant; address the Court regarding the nature and seriousness of the offense; respond factually to questions raised by the Court; correct factual inaccuracies in the presentence report or sentencing record; and rebut any statement of facts made by or on behalfofthe defendant at sentencing. b. Nothing in this agreement shall limit the government in its comments in, and responses to, any post-sentencing matters. 4. The defendant understands, agrees, and has had explained to him by counsel that the Court may impose the following statutory maximum sentence oncount One (kidnapping): life imprisonment, a 5-year period ofsupervised release, a $250,000 fine, and a $100 special assessment. Full restitution shall be ordered. 5. The defendant further understands that supervised release may be revoked ifits terms and conditions are violated. When supervised release is revoked, the original term of imprisonment may be increased by up to 5 years per count ofconviction. Thus, a violation of supervised release increases the possible period of incarceration and makes it possible that the defendant will have to serve the original sentence, plus a substantial additional period, without credit for time already spent on supervised release. 6. The defendant agrees to pay a fine as directed by the court. The defendant further agrees that forfeiture, restitution, fine, assessment, tax, interest, or other payments in this case do not constitute extraordinary acceptance of responsibility or provide any basis to seek a downward departure or variance from the applicable Sentencing Guideline range.

7. In order to facilitate the collection of financial obligations to be imposed in connection with this prosecution, the defendant agrees fully to disclose all assets in which he has any interest or over which the defendant exercisescontrol, directly or indirectly, including those held by a spouse, nominee, or other third party. Accordingly: a. The defendant will promptly submit a completed financial statement to the U.S. Attorney's Office, in a form it provides and as it directs. The defendant promises that his financial statement and disclosures will be complete, accurate, and truthful. b. The defendant expressly authorizes the U.S. Attorney's Office to obtain a credit report on him in order to evaluate the defendant's ability to satisfy any financial obligation imposed by the Court. 8. The defendant agrees to pay the special victims/witness assessment in the amount of$100 at such time as directed by the Court. 9. Pursuant to Guideline Section 1B1.2, the parties stipulate that the defendant committed the following offenses in addition to the offense ofconviction, and the defendant understands and agreesthat, for the purpose ofdetermining the defendant's Sentencing Guidelines range, Section IB 1.2(c) provides that these additional offenses shall be treated as ifthe defendant had been convicted ofadditional counts charging these offenses: a. From on or about October 1,2014, to on or about October 3, 2014. in Richmond, Virginia, the defendant Delvin Barnes abducted 16-year-old victim, J.C, held her captive, and took her to Charles City, County, Virginia, where the defendant sexually assaulted J.C. and attempted to kill her.

b. The defendant will not be prosecuted by the Commonwealth ofvirginia, in either Richmond, Virginia, and/or Charles City County, Virginia, for the crimes described in paragraph 9(a) above. c. Nothing in this agreement shall bar any governmental entity from prosecuting criminal charges for any activities that occur after the date ofthis agreement or have not been disclosed by the defendant as ofthe date ofthis agreement. 10. Pursuant to USSG 6B1.4, the partiesenter into the following stipulations under the Sentencing Guidelines Manual. It is understood and agreed that: (1) the parties are free to argue(except as stated below) the applicability of any other provision of the Sentencing Guidelines, including offense conduct, offense characteristics, criminal history, adjustments, and departures; (2) these stipulationsare not bindingupon eitherthe Probation Office or the Court; and (3) the Court may make factual and legal determinations that differ from these stipulations andthat may result in an increase or decrease in the Sentencing Guidelines range and the sentencethat may be imposed: a. The parties agree and stipulate that from November 2, 2014, to November 5, 2014, the defendant sexually exploited victim C.G.F., after the defendant kidnapped C.G.F.. and while the defendant unlawfully held C.G.F. against her will, resulting in a 6-level increase pursuant to USSG 2A4.1 (b)(5). b. The parties agree and stipulate that, as of the date of this agreement, the defendant has demonstrated acceptance ofresponsibility for his offense, making the defendant eligible for a 2-level downward adjustment under USSG 3E1.1(a). c. The parties agree and stipulate that, as ofthe date ofthis agreement, the defendant has assisted authorities in the investigation or prosecution ofhis own misconduct by

timely notifying the government ofhisintent to plead guilty, thereby permitting the government to avoid preparing for trial and permitting the government and the court to allocate theirresources efficiently, resulting in a I-level downward adjustment under USSG 3El. 1(b). 11. Ifthe defendant commits any federal, state, or local crime between the date ofthis agreement and his sentencing, or otherwise violates any other provision of this agreement, the government may declare a breach ofthe agreement, and may at its option: (a) prosecute the defendant for any federal crime including, but not limited to, perjury, obstruction ofjustice, and the substantive offenses arising from this investigation, based on and using any information provided by the defendant during the investigation and prosecution ofthe criminal case; (b) upon government motion, reinstate and try the defendant on any counts which were to be, or which had been, dismissed on the basis of this agreement; (c) be relieved ofany obligations underthis agreement regarding recommendations as to sentence; and (d) be relieved ofany stipulations under the Sentencing Guidelines. Moreover, the defendant's previously entered guilty plea will stand and cannot be withdrawn by him. The decision shall be in the sole discretion of the government both whether to declare a breach, and regarding the remedy or remedies to seek. The defendant understands and agrees that the fact that the government has not asserted a breach ofthis agreement or enforced a remedy under this agreement will not barthe government from raising that breach or enforcing a remedy at a later time. 12. If the Court accepts the recommendation of the parties and imposes the sentence stated in paragraph 2 ofthis agreement, the government agrees that it will not file any appeal ofthe sentence in this case, and the defendant agrees that he voluntarily andexpresslywaives all rights to appeal or collaterally attack the conviction, sentence, or any other matter relating to this prosecution, whether such a right to appeal or collateral attack arises under 18 U.S.C. 3742,28

U.S.C. 1291,28 U.S.C. 2255, or any other provisionof law. However, the defendant retains the right to file a claim, if otherwise allowed by law, that an attorney who represented the defendant during the course ofthis criminal case provided constitutionally ineffective assistance. 13. If the Court does not accept the recommendation of the parties to impose the sentence stated in paragraph 2 ofthis agreement, and the defendant nevertheless decides to enter a guilty plea, without objection by the government, then the defendant voluntarily and expressly waives all rightsto appeal or collaterally attack the defendant's conviction, sentence, or any other matter relating to this prosecution, whether such a right to appeal or collateral attack arises under 18 U.S.C. 3742, 28 U.S.C. 1291,28 U.S.C. 2255, or any other provision oflaw. a. Notwithstanding the waiver provision above, if the government appeals from the sentence, then the defendant may file a direct appeal of his sentence. b. If the government does not appeal, then notwithstanding the waiver provision set forth in this paragraph, the defendant may file a direct appeal or petition for collateral relief but may raise only a claim, ifotherwise permitted by law in such a proceeding: (1) that the defendant's sentence on any count ofconviction exceeds the statutory maximum for that count as set forth in paragraph 4 above; (2) challenging a decision by the sentencingjudge to impose an "upward departure" pursuant to the Sentencing Guidelines; (3) challenging a decision by the sentencing judge to impose an"upward variance" above the final Sentencing Guideline range determined by the Court: (4) that an attorney who represented the defendant during the course ofthis criminal case provided constitutionally ineffective assistance ofcounsel; and

If thedefendant doesappeal orseekcollateral reliefpursuant to this subparagraph, no issue may be presented by the defendant in such a proceedingother than those described in this subparagraph. 14. The defendant acknowledges that filing an appeal or any collateral attack waived in either ofthe two preceding paragraphs may constitute a breach ofthis plea agreement. The government promises that it will not declare a breach ofthe plea agreement on this basis basedon the mere filing ofa notice ofappeal, but may do so only after the defendant or his counsel thereafter states, eitherorally or in writing, a determination to proceed with an appeal or collateral attack raising an issue the government deemsbarred by thewaiver. The parties acknowledge that the filing and pursuit ofanappeal constitutes a breach only if a court determines that the appeal does not present an issue that a judge may reasonably conclude is permitted by an exception to the waiver stated in the preceding paragraph or constitutes a''miscarriage ofjustice" as that term is defined in applicable law. 15. The defendant waives all rights, whether asserted directly or by a representative, to request or receive from any department oragency ofthe United States any records pertaining to the investigation or prosecution ofthis case, including without limitation any records that may be sought underthe Freedom ofinformation Act, 5 U.S.C. 552. or the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a.

It is agreed that the parlies' guilty plea agreement contains no additional promises, agreements, or understandings other than those set forth in this written guilty plea agreement, and that no additional promises, agreements, or understandings will be entered into unless in writing and signed by all parties. ZANE DAVID MEMEGER niiled States Attorney DELVIN BARNES Defendant CVU^<S*?0U PETER I'. SCHENCK Chief. Criminal Division Assistant United States Attorney ELIZABETH TOPLIN Counsel for the Defendant 0 jc^-mcs'llto/^ JEANINE LINEMAN Assistant United Stales Attorney lim CSV) NINA NARPIZRR SPIZER \ Counsel for Defendant (\ Dale: 1 SePf 10 is -8-

Attachment IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CRIMINAL NO. 14-613 DELVIN BARNES ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RIGHTS I hereby acknowledge that I have certain rights that I will be giving up by pleading guilty. 1. I understand that 1do not have to plead guilty. 2. I may plead not guilty and insist upon a trial. 3. At that trial, I understand a. that I would have the right to be tried by a jury that would be selected from the Eastern District ofpennsylvania and that along with my attorney, I would have the right to participate in the selection ofthat jury; b. that the jury could only convict me if all 12 jurors agreed that they were convinced ofmy guilt beyond a reasonable doubt; c. that the government would have the burden of proving my guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and that I would not have to prove anything; d. that I would be presumed innocent unless and until such time as the jury was convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the government had proven that I was guilty; e. that I would have the right to be represented by a lawyer at this trial and at any appeal following the trial, and that if I couldnot afford to hire a lawyer, the courtwould appoint one for me free ofcharge; f. that through my lawyer I would have the right to confront and cross-examine the witnesses against me;

g. that I could testify in my own defense if I wanted to and I could subpoena witnesses to testify in my defense ifi wanted to; and h. that I would not have to testify or otherwise present any defense if I did not want to and that if I did not present any evidence, the jury could not hold that against me. 4. I understand that ifi plead guilty,there will be no trial and I would be givingup all ofthe rights listed above. 5. I understand that if I decide to entera plea ofguilty, the judge will ask me questions under oath and that if I lie in answering those questions, I could be prosecuted for the crime of perjury, that is, for lying under oath. 6. I understand that if I plead guilty, I have given up my right to appeal,except as set forth in the appellate waiver provisions of my plea agreement. 7. Understanding that I have all these rights and that by pleading guilty 1am giving them up, I still wish to plead guilty. 8. I acknowledge that no one has promised me what sentence the Court will impose. I am aware and have discussed with my attorney that, at sentencing, the Court will calculatethe Sentencing Guidelines range (including whether any departures apply), and then, in determining my sentence, will consider the Guideline range andall relevant policy statements in the Sentencing Guidelines, along with other sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. 3553(a), including (1) the natureand circumstances ofthe offense and my personal history and characteristics; (2) the need for the sentence imposed- (A) to reflect the seriousness ofthe offense, to promote respect for the law, and to provide just punishment for the offense; (B) to afford adequate deterrence to criminal conduct; (C) to protect the public from further crimes of the defendant; and (D) to provide the defendant with needed educational or vocational training, medical care, or other correctional treatment in the most effective manner; (3) the kinds ofsentences available; (4) the need to avoid unwarranted sentence disparities among defendants with similar records who have been found guilty ofsimilar conduct; and -2-

(5) the need to provide restitution to any victims ofthe offense. DELVIN BARNES Defendant ELIZABETH TOPLIN Counsel for the Defendant ift CSfrQyx NINASPIZERX \^ Counsel for the Defendant Dated: <7 StP-T ZOIS -3-