Case 4:13-md YGR Document Filed 02/08/18 Page 1 of 13 EXHIBIT D

Similar documents
Case 4:13-md YGR Document Filed 02/08/18 Page 1 of 38 EXHIBIT EE

Case 4:13-md YGR Document Filed 05/26/17 Page 1 of 28 EXHIBIT 9

Case 4:13-md YGR Document Filed 05/26/17 Page 1 of 16 EXHIBIT 25

Case 4:13-md YGR Document Filed 09/08/16 Page 1 of 7

Case 4:13-md YGR Document Filed 05/26/17 Page 1 of 6 EXHIBIT 51

Case 2:08-md GP Document 1046 Filed 09/05/14 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Case 4:13-md YGR Document Filed 05/26/17 Page 1 of 17 EXHIBIT 26

Case 4:13-md YGR Document Filed 05/26/17 Page 1 of 20 EXHIBIT 34

Case 4:13-md YGR Document Filed 05/26/17 Page 1 of 6 EXHIBIT 65

Case 4:13-md YGR Document 2104 Filed 12/22/17 Page 1 of 50

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. 1. I am a member of the law firm of Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP

Case3:07-md SI Document7414 Filed12/21/12 Page1 of 9

Case 3:08-cv VRW Document 9 Filed 07/23/2008 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 4:13-md YGR Document Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 5

Case 4:13-md YGR Document 2322 Filed 05/16/18 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 4:13-md YGR Document 1292 Filed 05/26/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Case3:10-cv SI Document135 Filed07/11/12 Page1 of 6

Case4:11-cv YGR Document22 Filed02/16/12 Page1 of 5

Case 4:14-md CW Document 615 Filed 03/29/17 Page 1 of 9

Case 4:13-md YGR Document Filed 05/26/17 Page 1 of 6 EXHIBIT 49

Case3:07-md SI Document7164 Filed11/15/12 Page1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY IN RE: LIQUID ALUMINUM SULFATE ANTITRUST LITIGATION. Civil Action No. 16-md-2687 (JLL) (JAD)

Case 1:08-cv BMC-PK Document 1356 Filed 02/29/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case 4:10-cv YGR Document Filed 06/17/16 Page 1 of 11

Case 2:13-md MMB Document 185 Filed 03/16/15 Page 1 of 9

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 374 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 1 of 5

Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 4:17-cv YGR Document 19 Filed 04/26/17 Page 1 of 6

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT WITH PPG INDUSTRIES, INC., PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION, AND APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND EXPENSES

Case 2:13-md MMB Document 427 Filed 07/18/16 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:05-md JG-JO Document Filed 04/11/13 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: EXHIBIT 3

Rupa Marya v. Warner Chappell Music Inc Doc. 332 Att. 1

Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 4:13-md YGR Document 1714 Filed 03/20/17 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Partial Settlement of Class Action Involving Global Distribution Systems

2:12-cv MOB-MKM Doc # 91 Filed 05/16/14 Pg 1 of 22 Pg ID 1109

Partial Settlement of Class Action Involving Global Distribution Systems

Case 3:15-md CRB Document 1084 Filed 01/21/16 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:17-cv LB Document 87 Filed 03/28/18 Page 1 of 6

Case 3:16-md RS Document 72 Filed 06/15/16 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)

Case 4:13-md YGR Document Filed 05/26/17 Page 1 of 37 EXHIBIT 32

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 160 Filed 02/08/2007 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:05-cv SRC-CLW Document 991 Filed 04/29/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 65881

Case 4:06-cv CW Document 81 Filed 03/25/2008 Page 1 of 10

2:12-cv MOB-MKM Doc # 106 Filed 10/22/14 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 1242

Case 3:17-cv VC Document Filed 09/06/18 Page 1 of 6

U.S. District Court California Northern District (Oakland) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 4:10-cv CW

Case 3:16-cv EMC Document Filed 06/29/18 Page 1 of 4

RANDELL ALLEN, Plaintiff, v. BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT, OFFICER OUKA, OFFICER ENNIS, OFFICER JOE and DOES ONE through FIFTY,

EX PARTE MOTION FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME FOR HEARING ON CHARLES H. MOORE S JOINDER TO MOTION OF THE CREDITORS

You Could Get Money From $44.95 Million in Settlements A Federal Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

Case 1:11-md NGG-RER Document 603 Filed 06/10/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: June 10, 2015

Case 1:13-cv WHP Document 571 Filed 06/02/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS NOTICE AND WHY WAS IT SENT TO ME?

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case 2:05-cv SRC-CLW Document 992 Filed 04/29/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 65902

Case3:14-cv VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page1 of 43

Case 3:17-cv WHO Document 153 Filed 08/30/17 Page 1 of 5

Case 4:13-md YGR Document 1357 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 21

Case 2:08-md GP Document 1159 Filed 04/07/15 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF DIRECT PURCHASER CLASS ACTION WITH TIN INC., USG CORPORATION AND UNITED STATES GYPSUM COMPANY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT IN CLASS ACTION

Woods et al v. Vector Marketing Corporation Doc. 276 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

2:12-cv MOB-MKM Doc # 320 Filed 10/21/16 Pg 1 of 25 Pg ID 5946

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (OAKLAND DIVISION)

Case 3:14-cv L-NLS Document 60 Filed 11/18/15 Page 1 of 3

Case 3:13-cv JST Document 879 Filed 04/03/17 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS-ACTION SETTLEMENT

Case 3:17-cv BRM-LHG Document 71 Filed 09/18/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID: 708 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : OPINION :

Case4:09-cv CW Document42 FUedi 0/07/09 Pagel of 9

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

Case 2:08-cv DMC-JAD Document Filed 07/02/13 Page 1 of 119 PageID: Exhibit 7D

CONSENT TO JOIN ACTION (FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT, 29 U.S.C. 216(b))

Case 3:10-md RS Document 1758 Filed 12/15/15 Page 1 of 19

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA HARRISBURG DIVISION : MDL DOCKET NO : : : :

Case3:11-cv WHA Document33 Filed01/06/12 Page1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Plaintiffs,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case3:13-cv MMC Document95 Filed09/17/14 Page1 of 7

Case 4:02-cv Document 538 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 1 of 2

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

CASE NO. 16-CV RS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case 1:12-cv WHP Document 79 Filed 05/05/16 Page 1 of 4

Case3:12-cv SI Document93-3 Filed01/10/14 Page1 of 7

Case3:15-cv VC Document25 Filed06/19/15 Page1 of 8

> [ ORDER ESTABLISHING

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ) Defendants. )

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 104 Filed 12/22/2006 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Transcription:

Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 2172-4 Filed 02/08/18 Page 1 of 13 EXHIBIT D

Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 2172-4 Filed 02/08/18 Page 2 of 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Judith A. Zahid (SBN 215418) Qianwei Fu (SBN 242669) Heather T. Rankie (SBN 268002) ZELLE LLP 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3400 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 693-0700 Facsimile: (415) 693-0770 jzahid@zelle.com qfu@zelle.com hrankie@zelle.com Interim Liaison Counsel for Direct-Purchaser Plaintiffs 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 IN RE: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES ANTITRUST LITIGATION This Document Relates to: ALL DIRECT PURCHASER ACTIONS Case No. 13-md-02420 (YGR) (DMR) CLASS ACTION DECLARATION OF JUDITH A. ZAHID IN SUPPORT OF CO-LEAD COUNSEL FOR DIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS FEES, REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES AND SERVICE AWARDS Date: May 8, 2018 Time: 2:00 p.m. Courtroom: 1, 4th Floor Judge: Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers 28 DECLARATION OF JUDITH A. ZAHID IN SUPPORT OF CO-LEAD COUNSEL FOR DIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS FEES, REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES AND SERVICE AWARDS Case No. 13-md-02420 YGR (DMR), MDL No. 2420

Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 2172-4 Filed 02/08/18 Page 3 of 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I, Judith A. Zahid, hereby declare as follows: 1. I am a member in good standing of the State Bar of California and the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. I am a Partner with the law firm of Zelle LLP ( Zelle ) and am the Liaison Counsel for the Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs ( DPPs ) in this matter. I make this Declaration in Support of Co-Lead Counsel for the Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs Motion for An Award of Attorneys Fees, Reimbursement of Expenses and Service Awards (the Motion ). I have personal knowledge of the facts in this Declaration, and if called as a witness, I could and would testify competently to the truth of the matters stated herein. 2. To finance this litigation, Co-Lead Counsel for the DPPs established a litigation cost fund (the Litigation Fund ) maintained by my firm. Counsel have collected regular monetary contributions from certain law firms representing the DPPs and placed those contributions in the Litigation Fund. The total amount of contributions made to the Litigation Fund to date is $2,260,000. Most joint litigation costs and expenses incurred by the DPPs have been paid out of the Litigation Fund. Individual law firms have also paid for certain litigation costs and expenses separately. Fund. 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit A shows DPP firms contributions to the Litigation 4. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a report summarizing the Litigation Fund expenses incurred and paid to date. The total litigation costs and expenses that have been paid from the Litigation Fund is $2,247,198.62. The Litigation Fund has a remaining balance of $12,801.38. 5. As summarized in Exhibit B, these costs and expenses include specifically those associated with expert economists and consultants, ediscovery analytics and predictive coding of Defendants documents, depositions and court reporters, mediation, translations, foreign service of process, and other litigation support. 6. Plaintiffs Counsel retained Roger G. Noll, Ph.D. of Stanford University as a - 1 - DECLARATION OF JUDITH A. ZAHID IN SUPPORT OF CO-LEAD COUNSEL FOR DIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS FEES, REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES AND SERVICE AWARDS Case No. 13-md-02420 YGR (DMR), MDL No. 2420

Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 2172-4 Filed 02/08/18 Page 4 of 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 testifying expert to opine on whether the methods of antitrust economics that would be used to prove liability and to calculate damages in this matter are common to members of the direct purchaser class. Plaintiffs Counsel also retained OSKR, LLC (f/k/a C&A Economics) to provide integrated staff support to Dr. Noll. Dr. Noll and OSKR staff performed extensive work in connection with initial damages estimate, motions to dismiss, class certification proceedings and expert discovery. Dr. Noll submitted his opening report on January 22, 2016 and reply report on August 23, 2016. Dr. Noll spent 294 hours at $800/hour on this matter and has charged $245,278 for his work. OSKR spent 5,581.68 hours at mixed rates on this matter and has billed $1,590,529.36 for its work. Due to insufficient funds, Plaintiffs Counsel have paid OSKR $1,378,499.36 from the Litigation Fund, with an outstanding balance of $212,030 in unpaid invoices. 7. Plaintiffs Counsel also retained James L. Kaschmitter, Founder and CEO of SpectraPower, LLC to: (i) provide expert opinions on the lithium-ion battery industry and the development, manufacturing and characteristics of lithium-ion batteries; and (ii) evaluate the opinions of Defendants industry expert Quinn Horn. Mr. Kaschmitter submitted his original report on January 22, 2016 and rebuttal report on August 23, 2016. Mr. Kaschmitter also performed work in connection with Defendants motion to compel and Daubert motion, as well as the proposed plan of settlement distribution. Mr. Kaschmitter spent 226.25 hours on this matter and has charged $128,125 for his work. 8. Plaintiffs Counsel have incurred additional costs in working with other industry expert consultants to analyze the characteristics of the lithium-ion battery industry and lithiumion battery products and provide consulting services to DPPs testifying experts. These nontestifying industry consultants have spent a total of 64.65 hours on this matter and have charged $16,996.64 for their work. Consultants A and B were undisclosed throughout the litigation and remain anonymous because of current ties to the industry. Consultant C is an attorney who was retained to represent an industry insider who likewise wishes to remain anonymous. - 2 - DECLARATION OF JUDITH A. ZAHID IN SUPPORT OF CO-LEAD COUNSEL FOR DIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS FEES, REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES AND SERVICE AWARDS Case No. 13-md-02420 YGR (DMR), MDL No. 2420

Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 2172-4 Filed 02/08/18 Page 5 of 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 9. Fifty depositions have been taken in the DPP case. Many of these depositions were multiple days and required the services of professional and check interpreters during their depositions. These depositions were necessary to obtain information from key witnesses and experts regarding liability and damages. Plaintiffs Counsel have incurred costs of $45,498.38 for court reporters and transcripts of depositions. 10. Plaintiffs Counsel have paid $132.30 from the Litigation Fund for transcripts of court proceedings before this Court. Co-Lead Counsel firms also paid separately for transcripts of additional court proceedings. These transcripts were necessary to review court proceedings and to ensure that Plaintiffs Counsel followed the Court s specific requests. 11. Defendants have produced in discovery 2.4 million documents, equaling 8.9 million pages. Because millions of pages of documents produced in this matter were in Japanese and Korean, Plaintiffs Counsel were required to and expend significant resources to translate these documents. In addition, third-party vendors and technical staff have been utilized in the analysis, imaging, and predictive coding of the documents produced by Defendants. Plaintiffs Counsel have incurred costs of $209,942.91 for foreign language translations and $97,336.29 for third-party ediscovery analytics services. 12. The parties have incurred significant costs for the mediation services of the Honorable Vaughn R. Walker (ret.) who successfully negotiated the Proposed Settlements in this matter. Plaintiffs Counsel have paid a total of $53,185.45 in mediation costs. 13. To effect service of process on the foreign defendants via the Hague Service Convention, Plaintiffs Counsel also paid a special process server $12,934 in costs. 14. Finally, Plaintiffs Counsel incurred additional costs for third-party vendors litigation support for motion hearing demonstratives, investigative work and production of industry materials. 15. These common litigation expenses were reasonably and necessarily incurred in connection with the prosecution of the DPPs claims this matter. - 3 - DECLARATION OF JUDITH A. ZAHID IN SUPPORT OF CO-LEAD COUNSEL FOR DIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS FEES, REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES AND SERVICE AWARDS Case No. 13-md-02420 YGR (DMR), MDL No. 2420

Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 2172-4 Filed 02/08/18 Page 6 of 13 16. These common litigation expenses are reflected on the books and records of Zelle. 2 These books and records are prepared from expense vouchers, check records, and other source 3 materials which are regularly kept and maintained by Zelle and accurately reflect the expenses 4 incurred and the expenses paid. 5 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my 6 knowledge. 7 Executed this 7th day of February 2018 in San Francisco, California. 8 9 10 Judith A. Zahid 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 4832-6586-7354v4 21 22 23 24 25 26 27-4 - 28 DECLARATION OF JUDITH A. ZAHID IN SUPPORT OF CO-LEAD COUNSEL FOR DIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS' NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FORAN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS' FEES, REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES AND SERVICE A WARDS Case No. I 3-md-02420 YGR (DMR), MDL No. 2420

Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 2172-4 Filed 02/08/18 Page 7 of 13 EXHIBIT A

Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 2172-4 Filed 02/08/18 Page 8 of 13 EXHIBIT A In re: Lithium Ion Batteries Antitrust Litigation Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs Counsel Litigation Fund Contributions FIRM TOTAL AMOUNT PAID Co-Lead Counsel Berman DeValerio $210,000.00 Pearson, Simon & Warshaw $210,000.00 Saveri & Saveri $210,000.00 Total from Co-Lead Counsel $630,000.00 Other Counsel Barrack, Rodos & Bacine $55,000.00 Berger & Montague $5,000.00 Boni & Zack $30,000.00 Bonsignore & Brewer $5,000.00 Carella Byrne Cecchi Olstein Brody & Agnello $5,000.00 Complex Litigation Group $5,000.00 Ezra Brutzkus Gubner $5,000.00 Fine Kaplan and Black $65,000.00 Finkelstein Thompson $15,000.00 Freed Kanner London & Millen $125,000.00 Friedman Law Group $5,000.00 Glancy Binkow $70,000.00 Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP $30,000.00 Grant & Eisenhofer $55,000.00 Gray Plant Mooty $10,000.00 Gross Belsky Alonso $50,000.00 Gustafson Gluek $85,000.00 Heins Mills & Olson $110,000.00 Hulett Harper Stewart $5,000.00 Kellogg Huber Hansen Todd Evans & Figel $85,000.00 Lite DePalma Greenberg $15,000.00 Lockridge Grindal Nauen $80,000.00 Mogin Law Firm $15,000.00 Nastlaw LLC $5,000.00 Nussbaum Law Group $55,000.00 Polsinelli LLP $125,000.00 Pritzker Law $40,000.00 Reinhardt Wendorf & Blanchfield $30,000.00 Saltz Mongeluzzi Barrett & Bendesky $65,000.00 Scarpulla, Law Offices of Francis $10,000.00 Shulman Law Firm $5,000.00

Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 2172-4 Filed 02/08/18 Page 9 of 13 Spector Roseman Kodroff & Willis $70,000.00 Steyer Lowenthal Boodrookas Alvarez & Smith $85,000.00 Stueve Siegel Hanson $15,000.00 Weinstein Kitchenoff & Asher $80,000.00 Zelle LLP $115,000.00 Total from Other Counsel $1,630,000.00 TOTALS $2,260,000.00 TOTAL COSTS PAID FROM FUND $2,247,198.62 TOTAL REMAINING IN FUND $12,801.38

Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 2172-4 Filed 02/08/18 Page 10 of 13 EXHIBIT B

Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 2172-4 Filed 02/08/18 Page 11 of 13 EXHIBIT B In re: Lithium Ion Batteries Antitrust Litigation Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs Counsel Litigation Expense Summary EXPERT ECONOMISTS & CONSULTANTS Roger G. Noll (total).. Retainer fee. Opening report Reply report & deposition... C&A Economics/OSKR (total).. Pleadings & motions to dismiss.. Discovery requests... Data analyses & support for testifying expert. James L. Kaschmitter (total).. Retainer fee. Opening report Rebuttal report... Expert discovery and motion to compel.. Daubert motion Plan of distribution.. $245,278 $10,000 $147,250 $88,028 $1,378,499.36 $45,728.75 $3,543.75 $1,329,226.86 $128,125 $10,000 $50,625 $23,125 $35,750 $1,875 $6,750 Consultant A... $10,032.64 Consultant B... $6,714 Consultant C... $250 SUBTOTAL.. $1,768,899

Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 2172-4 Filed 02/08/18 Page 12 of 13 E-DISCOVERY ANALYTICS Inventus. $78,818.88 4Discovery, LLC.. $2,956.79 Enterprise Knowledge Partners, LLC... $2,137.5 TransPerfect Legal Solutions... $13,423.12 SUBTOTAL... $97,336.29 MEDIATION Federal Arbitration, Inc. (Hon. Vaughn R. Walker)... $53,185.45 SUBTOTAL... $53,185.45 COURT HEARING TRANSCRIPTS Renee H. Mercado... $72.90 Diane Skillman... $59.40 SUBTOTAL.. $132.30 COURT REPORTERS, DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPTS, VIDEOGRAPHERS TSG Reporting $28,014.35 US Legal Support... $17,484.03 SUBTOTAL... $45,498.38 FOREIGN LANGUAGE TRANSLATIONS Consortra Translations $209,942.91 SUBTOTAL... $209,942.91

Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 2172-4 Filed 02/08/18 Page 13 of 13 SERVICE OF PROCESS Crowe Foreign Services. $12,934 SUBTOTAL... $12,934 INVESTIGATION/INDUSTRY MATERIALS UL specifications $917 International Battery Seminar & Exhibits... $5,200 UL LLC document production... $448 Sprint document production... $270 Lindley P. Fraley $723.75 SUBTOTAL... $7,558.75 LITIGATION SUPPORT The Focal Point LLC... $50,203.79 SUBTOTAL... $50,203.79 MISCELLANEOUS Bank Fees... $37.56 Team MHC (Litigation Fund check stock) $466.15 Travel & lodging expenses for witness (Takeshima). $1,004.04 SUBTOTAL... $1,507.75 TOTAL... $2,247,198.62