CHAPTER 3 WORKFORCE DIVERSITY, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY, AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION CHAPTER DESCRIPTION

Similar documents
GUIDELINES ON DISCRIMINATION BECAUSE OF NATIONAL ORIGIN, PART 1606

The Civil Rights Act of 1991

The Civil Rights Act of 1991

Statutory Basis 1/28/2009. Chapter 6. National Origin Discrimination

The Evolution of Discrimination Laws & How To Remain Compliant. Chad E. Wallace Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, P.C.

Government Chapter 5 Study Guide

The legality of affirmative action plans and consent decrees in the light of recent court decisions

The National Federation of Paralegal Associations, Inc. Position Statement on Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity

EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION LAW PROFESSOR VIKRANT KISHIN ADVANI SPRING 2015 COURSE NUMBER: 37:575:316, SECTION NUMBER: 02

WESA AND THE MINNESOTA HUMAN RIGHTS ACT. Minnesota Department of Human Rights

STEVENS, JOHN PAUL (1920- ) James P. Scanlan

Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs. Protecting Your Workplace Rights

Diversity in the Workplace Diversity Beyond the Color: Do You Really Know Me?

Habitat For Humanity of Greater Nashville APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT

CRS Report for Congress

Chapter 21: Civil Rights: Equal Justice Under Law Opener

Habitat For Humanity of Greater Nashville APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT

Civil Rights. New Employee Orientation March 2018

Equal Rights Under the Law

Northwest Wisconsin WDA #7 Equal Opportunity In Employment, Affirmative Action, and Service Delivery Statement

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: LOWERING THE STANDARD OF STRICT SCRUTINY. Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003) Marisa Lopez *

Boone County Government

Non-Discrimination and Anti-Harassment Policy

Federal Affirmative Action Law: A Brief History

United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Investigating EEO complaints. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page

EMPLOYMENT EQUITY ACT NO. 55 OF 1998

Guidelines for Academic Interview Questions

When "The Evil Day" Comes, Will Title VII's Disparate Impact Provision be Narrowly Tailored to Survive an Equal Protection Clause Challenge?

S 0357 SUBSTITUTE A ======= LC01392/SUB A/4 ======= S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

When "The Evil Day" Comes, Will Title VII's Disparate Impact Provision be Narrowly Tailored to Survive an Equal Protection Clause Challenge?

Immigration Discrimination. Objectives. Immigration: It s. Only 3.4% Of Missouri s Population Is Foreign-born. Types of U.S.

September 19, Veronica Zertuche, Esq. Deputy City Attorney City of San Antonio 100 Military Plaza, 3 rd Floor San Antonio, Texas 78205

(1 August 2014 to date) EMPLOYMENT EQUITY ACT 55 OF (Gazette No , Notice No dated 19 October 1998.

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT INVESTIGATIONS DIVISION

CHAPTER 17 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1. CONCLUSIONS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, CV-W-2-ECF

NONDISCRIMINATION AND EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY

EMPLOYMENT EQUITY ACT NO. 55 OF 1998

ABA Policy on Issues Concerning Women/Gender Equality Updated 2/16/17

PADP EEO, Affirmative Action, and Diversity in the Public Sector

CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS DIVISION 6, TITLE 5

Last Name First Name Middle Name Social Security Number. Street Address City State and Zip Code. Yes No If not, state Date of Birth

Cultivating Stakeholders to Aid in the Implementation of Civil Rights Programs

Ann Arbor, Michigan, Code of Ordinances >> TITLE IX - POLICE REGULATIONS >> Chapter 112 NON- DISCRIMINATION >>

Pf C Partners for Community

5/16/2018 BAN THE BOX EEOC S 2012 ENFORCEMENT GUIDELINES. OAPT Annual Training Program CAN I ASK THAT? INTERVIEWING TIPS AND BEST PRACTICES

Race, Ethnicity, and Economic Outcomes in New Mexico

Created by Alex Timian

The EEO Tabulation: Measuring Diversity in the Workplace ACS Data Users Conference May 29, 2014

OVERVIEW OF EEOC CHARGE PROCESSING

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY OFFICE

5. SUPREME COURT HAS BOTH ORIGINAL AND APPELLATE JURISDICTION

Proposed Consolidation of the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Downstate Medical Center The State University of New York. Office of Diversity & Inclusion R E C R U I T M E N T P A C K E T

Federal Civil Rights Statutes: A Primer

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Civil Rights and Diversity Training for Extension Councils, Committees, and Staff

EQUAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITY POLICY. Revised January, 2012 Adopted by the HAH Board of Commissioners 01/23/2012

Town of Orrington, Maine Employment Application

Piedmont Regional Jail Authority Post Office Drawer 388 Farmville, VA (434)

FORM 1.3 COMPLAINT FOR GROUP OR CLASS Use This Form to File a Complaint for a Group or Class of Persons. BC Human Rights Tribunal GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

Chapter 11: Civil Rights

The Gender Wage Gap in Durham County. Zoe Willingham. Duke University. February 2017

EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION

SOME CONSIDERATIONS REGARDINS THE PRINCIPE OF EQUAL OPORTUNITIES FOR WOMEN AND MEN IN LABOUR LAW

EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES (STAFF) POLICY

EEOC. v. Fox News. Cornell University ILR School. Judge William H. Pauly

Prepare for the EEOC s Targeted Enforcement for February 27, 2013

Last Name First Middle

FORM 1.1 INDIVIDUAL COMPLAINT Use This Form to File Your Own Complaint

CITY OF LOGAN, UTAH ORDINANCE NO

immigrant reservation refugee assimilation Introduction How have various minority groups in American society been discriminated against?

EXHIBIT B. MANDATORY EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY LANGUAGE N.J.S.A. 10:5-31 et seq. (P.L.1975, c.127) N.J.A.C. 17: et seq.

Implications of 9/11 for the Workplace

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

CRIMINAL RECORDS SCREENING AND FAIR HOUSING. A Toolkit for Consumers

SOUTHEAST LOS ANGELES COUNTY WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD (SELACO WDB) CIVIL RIGHTS AND COMPLAINTS SUMMARY FORM

THE COUNCIL. Committee Report of the Governmental Affairs Division

EEOC v. RSG Forest Products Inc. dba Estacada Lumber Co.

Fresno Regional Workforce Development Board

Affirmative Action, Reverse Discrimination Bratton v. City of Detroit

Pulling Open the Sticky Door

ADMINISTRATIVE INSTRUCTION

Doctrinal Dilemma. GEORGETOWN LAW. Georgetown University Law Center. Georgetown Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No.

Joanna Ferrie, Strathclyde Centre for Disability Research, University of Glasgow

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Revolution Studios and Smile Productions, LLC

PART FEDERAL SECTOR EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY

Maryland Commission on Civil Rights State Gov. Art., Title 20 MCCR 101

PART OF THE TMSL ON-LINE RESOURCES SERIES ON GENDER EQUITY

U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON JULY 23, 2009 Session

EQUAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITY

WATER HEATERS MASTERS INC. APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT CALIFORNIA

CIRCUIT COURT CLERK S OFFICE CONVERSION OF LAND RECORD INDEXING, IMAGING, AND PLAT RECORDS (SCANNING, INDEXING & SOFTWARE TO FACILITATE IMPROVED

APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT Virginia

EEOC Issues Comprehensive Guidance Regarding Employers' Use of Criminal Background Information

EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION CITY OF BILLINGS P.O. BOX 1178 BILLINGS, MT Notice to Applicants PERSONAL INFORMATION

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW I (LAW ) SPRING SEMESTER STETSON UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW Gulfport, Florida GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT CALIFORNIA. Name (Print) Last First Middle. Street and Number City State Zip Code Years Months

Transcription:

CHAPTER 3 WORKFORCE DIVERSITY, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY, AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION CHAPTER DESCRIPTION First, we describe the projected future diverse workforce. Then we describe diversity and diversity management and explain the various components of the present diverse workforce. But, developing this diverse workforce did not just happen. Major laws, Executive Orders, and Supreme Court decisions have had a major impact in formulating this new work environment. Therefore, the second part of this chapter provides an overview of the major EEO legislation that has impacted human resource management and helped to create this diverse workforce. Toward this end, we discuss the significant equal employment opportunity laws affecting human resource management. Then, we describe the importance of presidential Executive Orders 11246 and 11375. Next, we review significant Supreme Court decisions and describe the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. We then discuss the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures and address the issues of adverse impact, and additional guidelines. We devote the remainder of this chapter to affirmative action programs. KEY TERMS Diversity: Any perceived difference among people: age, functional specialty, profession, sexual orientation, geographic origin, lifestyle, tenure with the organization, or position. Diversity management: Ensuring that factors are in place to provide for and encourage the continued development of a diverse workforce by melding these actual and perceived differences among workers to achieve maximum productivity. Dual-career family: A situation in which both husband and wife have jobs and family responsibilities. Glass ceiling: The invisible barrier in organizations that prevents many women and minorities from achieving top-level management positions. Executive order (EO): Directive issued by the president that has the force and effect of law enacted by the Congress. Affirmative action: Stipulated by Executive Order 11246, it requires employers to take positive steps to ensure employment of applicants and treatment of employees during employment without regard to race, creed, color, or national origin. Adverse impact: A concept established by the Uniform Guidelines; it occurs if women and minorities are not hired at the rate of at least 80 percent of the best-achieving group. Affirmative action program (AAP): A program that an organization develops to employ women and minorities in proportion to their representation in the firm s relevant labor market.

DIVERSITY AND DIVERSITY MANAGEMENT LECTURE OUTLINE DIVERSITY Any perceived difference among people: age, race, religion, functional specialty, profession, sexual orientation, geographic origin, lifestyle, tenure with the organization, or position, and any other perceived difference. DIVERSITY MANAGEMENT Ensuring that factors are in place to provide for and encourage the continued development of a diverse workforce by melding these actual and perceived differences among workers to achieve maximum productivity. SINGLE PARENTS AND WORKING MOTHERS The number of nontraditional, single-parent households in the United States is growing. WOMEN IN BUSINESS The base of building a diverse workforce rests on an employer s ability to attract and retain females. DUAL-CAREER FAMILIES The increasing number of dual-career families presents both challenges and opportunities for organizations. WORKERS OF COLOR Workers of color often experience stereotypes about their group (Hispanics, African Americans, Asians, etc.). OLDER WORKERS It is estimated that by the year 2010 more than half of all US workers will be aged forty or more and legally protected by the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES A handicap, or disability, limits the amount or kind of work a person can do or makes achievement unusually difficult. IMMIGRANTS Large numbers of immigrants have settled in many parts of the United States. YOUNG PERSONS WITH LIMITED EDUCATION OR SKILLS Each year thousands of young, unskilled workers are hired, especially during peak periods, such as holiday buying seasons. EDUCATIONAL LEVEL OF EMPLOYEES Another form of diversity that is now found in the workplace is that of the educational level of employees. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY: AN OVERVIEW The concept of equal employment opportunity has undergone much modification and fine-tuning since the passage of the Civil Rights Act in 1964. LAWS AFFECTING EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY Numerous national laws have been passed that have had an impact on equal employment opportunity. CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1866 The oldest federal legislation affecting staffing. TITLE VII OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964, AMENDED 1972 Prohibits discrimination based on race, color, sex, religion, or national origin. AGE DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT ACT OF 1967, AMENDED IN 1978 AND 1986 Prohibits discrimination against anyone over forty years old. REHABILITATION ACT OF 1973 The act prohibits discrimination against disabled workers who are employed by certain government contractors and subcontractors and organizations that receive federal grants in excess of $2,500.

PREGNANCY DISCRIMINATION ACT OF 1978 Passed as an amendment to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the Pregnancy Discrimination Act prohibits discrimination in employment based on pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions. THE IMMIGRATION ACT OF 1990 Significantly revised U.S. policy on legal immigration and increased levels of immigrations, particularly employment-based immigration of highly skilled professionals and executives. THE ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION REFORM AND IMMIGRANT RESPONSIBILITY ACT OF 1996 Placed severe limitations on persons who have come to the United States and remain in the country longer than permitted by their visas and/or persons who have violated their non-immigrant status. THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) OF 1990 Prohibits discrimination against qualified individuals with disabilities. CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1991 Amended the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and had the following purposes: 1. To provide appropriate remedies for intentional discrimination and unlawful harassment in the workplace. 2. To codify the concepts of business necessity and job related pronounced by the Supreme Court in Griggs v Duke Power Company. 3. To confirm statutory authority and provide statutory guidelines for the adjudication of disparate impacts under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. 4. To respond to recent decisions of the Supreme Court by expanding the scope of relevant civil rights statutes in order to provide adequate protection to victims of discrimination. GLASS CEILING The invisible barrier in organizations that prevents many women and minorities from achieving top-level management positions. STATE AND LOCAL LAWS When EEOC regulations conflict with state or local civil rights regulations, the legislation more favorable to women and minorities applies. EXECUTIVE ORDER 11246, AS AMENDED BY EO 11375 EXECUTIVE ORDER (EO) A directive issued by the president and has the force and effect of laws enacted by Congress. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION Stipulated by EO 11246, requires employers to take positive steps to ensure employment of applicants and treatment of employees during employment without regard to race, creed, color, or national origin. SIGNIFICANT U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISIONS Knowledge of the law is obviously important. However, much more than the words in the law itself must be understood. GRIGGS v DUKE POWER COMPANY When human resource management practices eliminate a higher percentage of minority or women applicants, the burden of proof is on the employer to show that the practice is job related.

ALBERMARLE PAPER COMPANY v MOODY Reaffirmed the idea that any test used in the selection process or in promotion decisions must be validated if it is found that its use has had an adverse impact on women and minorities. PHILLIPS v MARTIN MARIETTA CORPORATION Ruled that the company had discriminated against a woman because she had young children. A major implication of this decision is that a firm cannot impose standards for employment only on women. ESPINOZA v FARAH MANUFACTURING COMPANY Ruled that Title VII does not prohibit discrimination on the basis of lack of citizenship. WEBER v KAISER ALUMINUM AND CHEMICAL CORPORATION Ruled that Title VII does not prohibit race-conscious affirmative action plans. DOTHARD v RAWLINGSON The impact of the decision is that height and weight requirements must be job related. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA REGENTS v BAKKE Reaffirmed that race may be taken into account in admission decisions. AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY v PATTERSON Allows seniority and promotion systems established since Title VII to stand, although they unintentionally hurt minority workers. MERITOR SAVINGS BANK v VINSON This was the first sexual harassment case to reach the U.S. Supreme Court and the Court ruled that Title VII is not limited to discrimination with only economic or tangible effects. CITY OF RICHMOND v J.A. CROSON CO. Affirmed a Court of Appeals ruling that the city s plan was not justified by a compelling governmental interest because the record revealed no prior discrimination by the city itself in awarding contracts, and the 30 percent set-aside was not narrowly tailored to accomplish a remedial purpose. ADARAND CONSTRUCTORS v PENA In a 5-4 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court criticized the moral justification for affirmative action, saying that race-conscious programs can amount to unconstitutional reverse discrimination and even harm those they seek to advance. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION 2003 In June 2003 the Supreme Court appeared to support the Bakke decision. In the case of Grutter v Bollinger, the Court ruled in a 5-4 decision that colleges and universities have a compelling interest in achieving diverse campuses. In Gratz v Bollinger, the Court, in a 6-3 decision, said that in trying to achieve diversity, colleges and universities cannot use point systems that blindly give extra credit to minority applicants. O CONNOR v CONSOLIDATED COIN CATERERS CORPORATION Declared that discrimination is illegal even when all the employees are members of the protected age group. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPORTUNITY COMMISSION Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, as amended, created the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Under Title VII, filing a discrimination charge initiates EEOC action. There are certain exceptions to the coverage of Title VII. RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS, WITH RESPECT TO THE EMPLOYMENT OF PERSONS OF A SPECIFIC RELIGION IN ANY OF THE INSTITUTION S ACTIVITIES ALIENS MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY UNIFORM GUIDELINES ON EMPLOYEE SELECTION PROCEDURES

The Guidelines provide a single set of principles that was designed to assist employers, labor organizations, employment agencies, and licensing and certification boards in complying with federal prohibitions against employment practices that discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, gender, and national origin. THE CONCEPT OF ADVERSE IMPACT A concept established by the Uniform Guidelines occurs if women and minorities are not hired at the rate of at least 80 percent of the best-achieving group. ADDITIONAL GUIDELINES Three major changes Interpretative Guidelines on Sexual Harassment, Guidelines on Discrimination Because of National Origin, and Guidelines on Discrimination Because of Religion merit additional discussion. INTERPRETATIVE GUIDELINES ON SEXUAL HARASSMENT The EEOC has also issued interpretative guidelines that state that employers have an affirmative duty to maintain a workplace free from sexual harassment. GUIDELINES ON DISCRIMINATION BECAUSE OF NATIONAL ORIGIN The EEOC broadly defined discrimination on the basis of national origin as the denial of equal employment opportunity because of an individual s ancestors or place of birth; or because an individual has the physical, cultural, or linguistic characteristics of a national origin group. GUIDELINES ON DISCRIMINATION BECAUSE OF RELIGION Employers have an obligation to accommodate religious practices unless they can demonstrate a resulting hardship. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PROGRAMS An approach that an organization with government contracts develops to demonstrate that workers are employed in proportion to their representation in the firm s relevant labor market.