Legislative Oversight in Japan

Similar documents
THE 6th INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR FOR PARLIAMENTARY RESEARCH SERVICES 18 November 2015, Seoul

Governance Issues under Japan s MMM: Intraparty Divisions, Winner-Take-All Stakes, & Bicameralism

Committees in a unicameral parliament: impact of a majority government on the ACT Legislative Assembly committee system *

Overview of the Act on the Protection of Specially Designated Secrets (SDS)

BOARD OF REGENTS GOVERNANCE RECOMMENDATIONS IMPLEMENTATION SCORECARD CURRENT AS OF FEBRUARY Recommendation Target Date Status COMPLETED

Regional Anti-Corruption Action Plan for Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, the Kyrgyz Republic, the Russian Federation, Tajikistan and Ukraine.

I am sorry that you are disappointed with the outcome of your request for information.

Structure of Governance: The UK

The Case for Proxy Advisor Reform

Model Parliament Unit

Communication (one to many)

The Government Owned Entities Bill, 2014 THE GOVERNMENT OWNED ENTITIES BILL, 2014 ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES

THE SPEAKER S COMMITTEE ON THE ELECTORAL COMMISSION

STATEMENT OF THE NDI PRE-ELECTION DELEGATION TO YEMEN S SEPTEMBER 2006 PRESIDENTIAL AND LOCAL COUNCIL ELECTIONS. Sana a, Yemen, August 16, 2006

LAW ON EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES ON WOMEN AND MEN

A Painful Shift in Bulgarian Anti-Corruption Policies and Practice

Towards a more transparent and coherent party finance system across Europe

THE SPEAKER S COMMITTEE ON THE ELECTORAL COMMISSION

Major initiatives to improve the quality and value of the research service: Current topics and challenges at the National Diet Library, Japan

HORIZON PHARMA PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY CHARTER OF THE NOMINATING AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Briefing on Reform of Political Party Financing, Czech Republic 1

UGBS 105 Introduction to Public Administration

REVIEWING PAY FOR CHAIRS OF COMMITTEES A CONSULTATION

THE FEDERAL LOBBYISTS REGISTRATION SYSTEM

Chapter 6 Congress 9/28/2015. Roots of the U.S. Congress 6.1. Bicameral legislature. TABLE 6.1 What are the powers of Congress? 6.

Government Response to Law Commission Report on The Public s Right to Know: Review of the Official Information Legislation

Recommendation of the Council for Development Co-operation Actors on Managing the Risk of Corruption

Project Title: Strengthening Transparency and Integrity in the Civil Service. Project Number: Project Duration:

Select Committees. Brief Guide

The Electoral System and its Impact on Electoral Behaviour: Is Taiwan s Experience Unusual?

Regional Execuitve Role Descriptions 2019

AP AMERICAN GOVERNMENT UNIT 5: GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS FRQ s

FINANCIAL SERVICES AGENCY GOVERNMENT OF JAPAN Kasumigaseki Chiyoda-ku Tokyo Japan

AP AMERICAN GOVERNMENT UNIT 5: GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS FRQ s

Why peers should support two Harries amendments. Lord Harries amendments for Tuesday 28 January

On October 28-29, 2006, Serbia held a two-day referendum that ratified a new constitution to replace the Milosevic-era constitution.

Challenges and Practices: Public Accounts Committees in Small and Large Legislatures. Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago 5 February, :45-12:15

Notification Requirement for Foreign Audit Firms under the Revised Japanese CPA Law

Youth and Governance. Youth Voices Group The World Bank

Freedom of information regulatory action policy

Factsheet P10 Procedure Series

THE RENEWAL OF REPRESENTATION

THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION CENTER FOR EAST ASIA POLICY STUDIES

Chapter 5: Political Parties Section 1

Canadian and American Governance: A Comparative Look

Environmental Politics in Other Industrialized Democracies Environmental Politics 1

THE ACTIVITIES OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON ANTI CORRUPTION PARLIAMENTARY STANDING COMMITTEE ON ANTICORRUPTION AND GOPAC TONGA

Case 1:13-cv Document 1 Filed 05/29/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Section 1: Executive Office of the President and the Cabinet Section 2: The Federal Bureaucracy Section 3: The Executive Branch and the Public Good

Anti-Corruption Policies in Asia and the Pacific Self-Assessment Report Nepal

ENERGY SECTOR ACT. Chapter one. GENERAL

Change and Continuity in Japanese Postwar Political Economy. Ikuo Kume Waseda University

Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) Decision notice

Audit of Political Engagement

WHISTLEBLOWER POLICY. FOR DIRECTORS, OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES Amended March 1, 2011

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 7

Providing an Alternative to Silence:

Annex 3 NIS Indicators and Foundations. 1. Legislature

Australia. 1. Fair. Regulatory framework

GCE AS 2 Student Guidance Government & Politics. Course Companion Unit AS 2: The British Political System. For first teaching from September 2008

Parliamentary Commissions of Inquiry

House of Lords Reform developments in the 2010 Parliament

Partnering Against Corruption Principles for Countering Bribery

Chapter 6 Democratic Regimes. Copyright 2015 W.W. Norton, Inc.

CITIZENS EFFECTING CHANGE

Proposed law on the National Fund to Support NGOs in Development Projects:

Fighting Corruption in Post- Euromaidan Ukraine: Results, Lessons and Failures. Andrei Marusov Head of the Board TI Ukraine

The establishment of the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority

San Joaquin County Grand Jury

CONGRESS EXAM REVIEW ADVANCED PLACEMENT AMERICAN GOVERNMENT 80 Questions/60 Minutes MAX Mr. Baysdell

and Public Trust IMPLEMENTING THE OECD PRINCIPLES FOR TRANSPARENCY AND INTEGRITY IN LOBBYING VOLUME 3

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013 I. BASIC INFORMATION REGARDING REPORT

Making official information requests

Countering Shadow Economy in Poland Program Summary /2017

Institutions of Democracy

THE MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ACT,

Regulating influence and access: Submission to the Inquiry into the Lobbying Code of Conduct by the Senate Finance and Public Affairs Committee

PARLIAMENT WATCH BANGLADESH SEPTEMBER DECEMBER 2010

Support to Good Governance: Project against Corruption in Ukraine (UPAC)

Elections in Fiji 2014 General Elections

Chapter 10: Congress

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ON POLITICAL PARTY AND CAMPAIGN FINANCING. APPENDIX No. 1. Matrix for collection of information on normative frameworks

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF BOSTON CHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

DEMOCRACY. United States of America formed between during the War of Independence.

JICA S APPROACH TO GOOD GOVERNANCE AND ANTI-CORRUPTION. Chie Miyahara *

Africa Integrity Indicators Country Findings

Election of Kurdistan Parliament: Kurdish Competition with Consequences on Baghdad

PROVISION OF TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE BY G20 ANTI-CORRUPTION WORKING GROUP COUNTRIES

U.S. Government Accountability Office

LEGISLATIVE ETHICS: A Comparative Analysis

Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying of Canada. Report on Plans and Priorities. The Honourable Tony Clement, PC, MP President of the Treasury Board

APPEALS, LITIGATION and WORKING WITH THE GENERAL COUNSEL

Act on the Protection of Specially Designated Secrets

Political Party Strengthening Toolkit Political Participation and Representation Programme

The Role of the Speaker: The Experience of South Africa in Transition

THEMATIC COMPILATION OF RELEVANT INFORMATION SUBMITTED BY LITHUANIA ARTICLE 7, PARAGRAPH 4 UNCAC CONFLICT OF INTEREST

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST BY EMPLOYEES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Good Regulatory Practices in the United States. Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs U.S. Office of Management and Budget

SAMPLE OF CONSTITUTIONAL & LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS THAT MAY BE USEFUL FOR CONSIDERATION

Transcription:

Legislative Oversight in Japan Michael Thies, UCLA Prepared for Taiwan s Legislative Yuan: Oversight or Overreach? The Brookings Institution Monday, June 23, 2014

Oversight in a Parliamentary System No separation of powers The executive branch and the legislative branch are headed by the same people So legislative oversight of cabinet ministers is, essentially, backbench oversight of party leaders Best done at Party HQ, not in the public eye 2

Oversight in a Parliamentary System Opposition parties would like to oversee ministers, but why should the ruling party institute rules to allow that? Complications (deviations from Westminster): 1. Coalition government (keeping tabs on partners) 2. Divided parliaments (twisted bicameralism) 3

Oversight in a Parliamentary System Still, executive means more than ministers, and even the ruling party wants to oversee civil servants (bureaucrats) But again, why not let the ministers (who are good agents) do that in-house? 4

Oversight in a Parliamentary System Hypothesis: As long as the ruling party has a long time horizon, effective formal procedures for oversight should be minimal. Even for fire alarm oversight, have the alarms ring in Party HQ, not in the courts. 5

Legislative Oversight in Japan During LDP s long period of dominance (1955-1993), formal legislative procedures were moribund. Gave (false) impression that bureaucrats were un-checked. ( Bureaucratic dominance ) But then the LDP lost power in 1993 6

Legislative Oversight in Japan Nov 1993 passage of an APA 1998 Changes to Diet Law and HR/HC rules PM question time Changes to the Cabinet Law in 1999 (eff. 2001) Information Disclosure Law (FOIA) in 1999 (eff. 2001) 7

Cabinet Law Changes (2001) Planning and Drafting instead of merely coordinating More resources, more Special Advisors for PM Ministers for Special Missions put above line ministries Councils reported to PM, drafted major bills New positions of State Secretary, Parliamentary Secretary 8

Bureaucratic Reorganization Reduced ministries from 22 to 12 Set up Independent Administrative Agencies to audit ministries Streamlining and shrinking to combat sectionalism Reduced and opened up shingikai Encouraged use of public hearings Limited membership, excluded officials Term limits Minority reports 9

Changes in the Diet From government delegate system to government witness system Establishment of Government Oversight Committees in both houses Increased used of committee investigations and questions by individual MPs QT introduced in late 1999 Effective? 10

More MPs demanding answers from the Cabinet ( 質問主意書 ) 4.5 4 3.5 Questions per day 3 2.5 2 1.5 HR rate HC rate 1 0.5 0 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 11

More questioning during Twisted Diets Lower House Upper House HR rate 0 1 2 3 4 HC rate 0 1 2 3 4 Divided Unified Divided Unified 12

Enhanced Fire Alarm Oversight? Administrative Procedure Act (1993) Agencies must establish and publicize standards for reviews that are as concrete as possible Includes times for administrative review Agencies must give reasons when applications are denied Notice and comment But many exemptions, and much discretion for officials 3 rd party intervention at discretion of officials 13

Enhanced Fire Alarm Oversight? Information Disclosure Act passed 1999, effective 2001. All agencies must adopt written standards for disclosure But much more restrictive than U.S. FOIA, with more exemptions and more discretion for officials No sanction for an agency s improper denial of an information request 14

Assessment The quantity of oversight activity seems to have increased in the last decade Perhaps there is a different attitude, some recognition of popular desire for transparency The laws do give some room for judicial enforcement, but they don t guarantee it Oversight is still largely channeled through the ruling party 15

Extra slides 16

But no differences for committee investigations C/Day 0.02.04.06.08.1 C/Day 0.02.04.06.08.1 Divided Maj-Min Unified AgFF Cabinet Ec_Trd_Ind GenAff Hlth_Wlfr_Lbr Data for Lower House Committees Only 17