Appellate Procedure (or how to clear a room in 30 seconds)

Similar documents
Rule 8.03 SUPREME COURT REVIEW OF COURT OF APPEALS DECISION

CIGA MEDICAL PROVIDER NETWORK UPDATE TOPICS. Utilization Review Update

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD STATE OF CALIFORNIA

205 CMR: MASSACHUSETTS GAMING COMMISSION

7/17/2018. Post DOI

TITLES II AND XVI: EFFECT OF THE DECISION IN LUCIA V. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (SEC) ON CASES PENDING AT THE

FIFTH CIRCUIT PRACTICE

TRIBAL CODE CHAPTER 82: APPEALS

Administrative Appeals

RULES OF PROCEDURE BEFORE THE COWLITZ COUNTY HEARINGS EXAMINER

THE JOINT RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE FOR COURTS OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

RULES OF THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL

IC Chapter 3. Adjudicative Proceedings

American Planning Association Indiana Chapter

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

CLAIMS ON APPEAL: A PRIMER ON THE APPELLATE PROCESS FOR CLAIMS PROFESSIONALS

Constitutional review by district court of administrative decisions and orders. A. Scope of rule. This rule governs writs of certiorari to

NOTICE OF FINAL RULEMAKING TITLE 16. TAX APPEALS CHAPTER 4. STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION PREAMBLE

MEDICAL STAFF FAIR HEARING PLAN

DSCC Uniform Administrative Procedures Policy

PARLIAMENT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA ARBITRATION ACT NO. 11 OF 1995

IC Chapter 17. Claims for Benefits

RULES OF CIVIL APPELLATE PROCEDURE. Tribal Council Resolution

ADMINISTRATIVE RULES FOR CONTESTED CASE HEARINGS MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN. Effective June 1, 2016 Amended June 19, 2017

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD STATE OF CALIFORNIA

VIRGIN ISLANDS SUPREME COURT RULES (as amended November 2, 2011)

Case 5:17-cv GW-DTB Document 42-1 Filed 08/08/17 Page 1 of 117 Page ID #:851

America Invents Act (AIA) Post-Grant Proceedings

RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER ON HEARINGS ON PERMIT APPLICATIONS AND OTHER HEARING MATTERS Policy & Procedure 921

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Regulatory Accountability Act of Key Differences Between the Senate RAA and H.R. 5

WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD STATE OF CALIFORNIA

America Invents Act (AIA) Post-Grant Proceedings. Jeffrey S. Bergman Kevin Kuelbs Laura Witbeck

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT. (Sacramento) ----

MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT: HOW THE APPELLATE COURTS AND JUDGES OPERATE AND STATISTICS RELEVANT TO EVALUATING YOUR INSURED S POTENTIAL APPEAL

ALABAMA STATE PERSONNEL BOARD ALABAMA STATE PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATIVE CODE

RULES OF PROCEDURE. For Applications & Appeals

WHEREAS, section , Florida Statutes, provides that charter counties may

3RD CIRCUIT LOCAL APPELLATE RULES Proposed amendments Page 1

Administrative Rules for the Office of Professional Regulation Effective date: February 1, Table of Contents

Any one or more of the following actions or recommended actions constitute grounds for a hearing unless otherwise specified in these Bylaws:

RULES OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS (Revised effective January 1, 2011)

SOUTHWEST INTERTRIBAL COURT OF APPEALS RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE

RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW COURT

1.000 Development Permit Procedures and Administration

INTERVIEW QUESTIONS - WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS POLICY AND PROCESS JURISDICTION: NOVA SCOTIA 1. STRUCTURE OF APPEAL PROCESS

Initial Civil Appeals: Delaware

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

ARTICLE 5.--ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT GENERAL PROVISIONS. K.S.A through shall be known and may be cited as the Kansas

(1) the defendant waives the presence of the law enforcement officer in open court on the record;

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. APPEAL OF ANNELIE MULLEN (New Hampshire Department of Employment Security)

NASD Notice to Members Executive Summary

No (and consolidated cases) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

There will be no fees for obtaining EAMS logins and passwords or for filing and accessing documents over the Internet using EAMS.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT ----

Seminole Appellate Court Rules of Appellate Procedure

CHAPTER 7. BOARD OF APPEALS

UNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Columbia County: ALAN J. WHITE, Judge. Affirmed. Before Sherman, Blanchard, and Kloppenburg, JJ.

RULES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE (ALL CAMPUSES)

Work Comp Litigation Basics

( HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH. ----oo0oo---- Travis L. Bowen, No Petitioner,

Case: , 12/29/2014, ID: , DktEntry: 20-1, Page 1 of 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RULES AND STATUTES ON HABEAS CORPUS with Amendments and Additions in the ANTITERRORISM AND EFFECTIVE DEATH PENALTY ACT OF 1996

New Jersey No-Fault Automobile Arbitration RULES. Effective May 1, New Jersey No-Fault Automobile Arbitration Rules

WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Case No. SJO

CORRECTIVE ACTION/FAIR HEARING PLAN FOR HENDRICKS REGIONAL HEALTH DANVILLE, INDIANA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 101,198. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, DARRON EDWARDS, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. v. No. 35,200. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY Alan Malott, District Judge

4.5 No Notice of Judgment or Order of Appellate Court; Effect on Time to File Certain Documents * * * * * *

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

UNITED STATES ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Minnesota No-Fault, Comprehensive or Collisions Damage Automobile Insurance Arbitration RULES

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO APPELLATE PROCEDURE

Chapter CONTAMINATED PROPERTIES FROM ILLEGAL DRUG MANUFACTURING OR STORAGE

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 89 1

U.S. Department of Homeland Security Citizenship and Immigration Services Administrative Appeals Office

Title 4 Administrative Review Procedures

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD STATE OF CALIFORNIA. 12 We have considered the allegations of the Petition for Reconsideration and Removal and the

Senate Language House Language H3931-3

PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT

*** THIS FILE INCLUDES ALL REGULATIONS ADOPTED AND PUBLISHED THROUGH THE *** *** NEW JERSEY REGISTER, VOL. 43, NO. 4, FEBRUARY

THE EDGE FIRM NEWS: The Liberal Construction Mandate of Labor Code Section 3202 Does Not Apply to Factual Disputes

Area Agency on Aging. Contractor. Complaint Resolution Process

SEPA ORDINANCE. Flexible thresholds for categorical exemptions ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (EIS) Preparation of EIS--Additional considerations

N.J.A.C. 6A:4, APPEALS TABLE OF CONTENTS

New Hampshire Employment Security Appeal Tribunal. Erika Randmere Administrator

RULES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION BUREAU OF TENNCARE

SUPREME COURT OF THE STA.F NEW YORK - NEW YORKiCOUWiY.PIIt.16. PRESENT: LAIJCE SCHLESINGER' PART 1~ ',_ 'Justice.~-

Chapter 205 DECISION-MAKING PROCEDURES

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. PETITION OF MICHAEL POULICAKOS (New Hampshire Retirement System)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before TYMKOVICH, BALDOCK, and EBEL, Circuit Judges.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 SESSION LAW SENATE BILL 781

HAWAII ADMINISTRATIVE RULES TITLE 12 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS SUBTITLE 7 BOARDS CHAPTER 47

Consolidated Arbitration Rules

Transcription:

Appellate Procedure (or how to clear a room in 30 seconds) Louis Larres, Esq. Bradford & Barthel, LLP Recons & Writs A party dissatisfied w/a final order of a WC Judge may seek review of that order by filing a petition for reconsideration. (LC sec. 5900) A final order is one which finally disposes of substantive rights in the matter, and includes a threshold disposition. Decisions on reconsideration of the appeals board are appealable by petition for writ of review with the Court of Appeal or Supreme Court of the State of Ca. (LC sec. 5950) www.bradfordbarthel.com 2 1

Must be aggrieved to have standing Labor code section 5900 provides: any person aggrieved directly or indirectly by a final order, decision or award made by the Board or WCJ, may petition the Appeals Board for reconsideration. The aggrieved person must be a party to the matter Claimant Dependent Employer Carrier Lien Claimant www.bradfordbarthel.com 3 Petition for Recon - Timeline Petition for Reconsideration Requires final order from the WCJ. No longer need to file w/ DWC Office which issued final order thanks to EAMS. Time limit to file petition for recon: 20 days from service + 5 days for mailing (even if served via EAMS) Not sufficient to be mailed w/in statutory period, but must be received by the Board w/in that period. Even when filing in EAMS it must be filed by 5:00 that day. www.bradfordbarthel.com 4 2

Formalities of Service Must be served upon all adverse parties. Proof of service required. Failure to do either can be fatal. www.bradfordbarthel.com 5 Other Considerations Petition must provide a fair statement of facts with citation to the record. (Reg. 10840). Must be under 25 pages. Board discourages filing of supplemental petitions. No exhibits!! (At all). www.bradfordbarthel.com 6 3

Grounds for Reconsideration Actions in Excess of Powers Labor Code 5903(a) states that the first ground for granting reconsideration is that by the order, decision or award made and filed by the appeals board or workers compensation judge, the appeals board acted without or in excess of its powers. Fraud The second ground is that the order, decision or award was procured by fraud. Petition must make specific and detailed offer of proof www.bradfordbarthel.com 7 Grounds for Reconsideration Findings Not Justified by Evidence Third ground for reconsideration that the evidence does not justify the findings of fact. Most common ground raised. Petition must set out specifically in detail how the evidence fails to support the findings. www.bradfordbarthel.com 8 4

Grounds for Reconsideration Newly-Discovered Evidence Fourth ground for reconsideration is petitioner has discovered new evidence material to him or her, which he or she could not, with reasonable diligence, have discovered and produced a the hearing Petition must be specific and detailed and include: Witnesses Testimony Description of evidence Effect of evidence will have on the record and prior decision Explanation as to why evidence could not have been discovered or produced prior to case submission. www.bradfordbarthel.com 9 Grounds for Reconsideration Decision Unsupported by Findings Fifth and final ground is that the findings of fact do not support the order, decision or award. This sort of defect does not occur frequently. Parties often allege this ground when they feel the decision of the WCJ mistakenly relies on the adverse party s evidence rather then their own. www.bradfordbarthel.com 10 5

Procedures for Reconsideration www.bradfordbarthel.com 11 Table of Times for Board Action Event Board Action Time Limits Filing of petition for reconsideration Filing of petition for reconsideration Filing of petition for reconsideration Filing of petition for reconsideration WCJ Modification WCJ Rescission w/ further proceedings ordered WCJ Report on Recon WCAB Grant of Petition or denial reconsideration 15 days from filing period 15 days from filing petition; Proceedings initiated w/ 30 days from recession 15 days from filing petition 60 days from filing petition or denied by operation of law www.bradfordbarthel.com 12 6

WCJ May Modify or Rescind WCJ may amend, modify or rescind a decision or order. WCJ may rescind or modify a decision within 15 days of a filing for a removal petition. Upon rescinding the original order or award, rules require further proceedings to be initiated within 30 days from the rescission order. www.bradfordbarthel.com 13 WCJ May Modify or Rescind Simple modifications or amendments to an order, decision or award do not require any additional proceedings. Clerical v. Substantive. A rescinded order requires the WCJ to issue a decision on all issues originally raised and not just those raised in the petition for reconsideration. Clock starts anew. An answer for reconsideration may be filed within ten days of the filing of the original petition. www.bradfordbarthel.com 14 7

The Appeals Board 7 members, 5 Attorneys, 6 Year Terms Appeals board is made up of seven (7) members, of which five (5) must be attorneys. All appointed by the Governor to six-year terms. Members carry the title of commissioner. One member is designated as chairman. www.bradfordbarthel.com 15 The Reconsideration Unit Appeals Board A legacy paper file is sent to the board or accessed electronically through EAMS. Every file logged in by the control unit. Each case pending on reconsideration assigned a panel of three (3) members of the board for hearing, consideration and decision. www.bradfordbarthel.com 16 8

En Banc Decisions Labor Code Sec 115 provides for cases to be reassigned by the Chairman on a majority vote of the appeals board to the appeals board as a whole in order to achieve uniformity of decisions, or in cases presenting novel issues. En banc decisions are persuasive authority and are binding precedent on all WCAB panels and all WCJ s. www.bradfordbarthel.com 17 Board Action The Board may grant or deny reconsideration without scheduling any further proceedings. Per Labor Code sections 5906: the appeals board may, with or without further proceedings and with or without notice affirm, rescind, alter, or amend the order decision or award made and filed by the appeals board or the workers compensation judge on the basis of the evidence previously submitted in the case, or may grant reconsideration and direct the taking of addition evidence www.bradfordbarthel.com 18 9

Board Action LC section 5907 empowers the board thus: If at the time of granting reconsideration, it appears to the satisfaction of the appeals board that no sufficient reason exists for taking testimony the appeals board may affirm, rescind, alter, or amend the order, decision or award made by the appeals board or the workers compensation judge and may without further proceedings, without notice, and without setting a time and place for further hearing, enter its findings, order, decision or award based upon the record in the case. www.bradfordbarthel.com 19 Time Limits for the Board LC Section 5909 ~ Board must act upon a petition for reconsideration w/ 60 days of the date of the filing of the petition or the petition is deemed denied by the operation of law. www.bradfordbarthel.com 20 10

Reconsideration on Board Motion The Board has the power under LC 5900 (b) to grant reconsideration of its own motion of any order, decision or award filed by the Board or any of its Workers Compensation Judge s within 60 days of the filing of such disposition. www.bradfordbarthel.com 21 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Reconsideration of the Reconsideration Petition for Emergency Stay (Reg. 10281) Must be served on opposing party no later than 10:00 a.m. of the immediately preceding court day. Notice must state nature of relief and give the date, time, and place that petition will be heard. Petition for Removal Non-final decisions Substantial prejudice/irreparable harm Bias Does not stay the proceedings like a recon does www.bradfordbarthel.com 22 11

Judicial Review www.bradfordbarthel.com 23 Writ of Review - Timeline Writ of Review Judicial review is implemented under LC 5950 Requires final board order Filed with Court of Appeal Appellate District where petitioner resides Time limits to file: 45 days from issuance; no extension for mailing except where recon order never received. Appellate court decisions are final 10 days after the filing of the opinion, unless writ granted. www.bradfordbarthel.com 24 12

Grounds for Review Grounds for appellate review are limited by Labor Code Section 5952 to: Appeals board acted without or in excess of its powers. The order, decision or award was procured by fraud. The order, decision or award was unreasonable. www.bradfordbarthel.com 25 Cont Grounds for Review The order, decision or award was not supported by substantial evidence. If findings of fact are made, such findings of fact support the order, decision or award under review. www.bradfordbarthel.com 26 13

Writ Denied Panel Decisions Writ Denial An appellate court may, and generally does, deny petitions for writ of review without specifying any reasons. A writ denied case stands as a final Board panel opinion that the Court of Appeal did not see fit to disturb. It is not a Court of Appeal opinion. The Court of Appeal has also approved that writ denied cases are citable authority as to the holding of the Board. www.bradfordbarthel.com 27 Granted Writs Counsel for both the petitioning and responding parties orally present their positions to the justices of the court and answer any questions. The matter is submitted and the court has 90 days to issue a decision. Decisions are in the form of written opinion either affirming or annulling the board order or remanding the case for further proceedings. www.bradfordbarthel.com 28 14

Other considerations Potential for bad case law. How to assess likelihood of success? LC 5801 If injured employee or the dependent of a deceased employee prevails in any petition by the employer for a writ of review and the reviewing court finds that there is no reasonable basis for the petition, it shall remand the cause for the purpose of making a supplemental award awarding a reasonable attorney's fee for services rendered in connection with the petition for writ of review. Greater risk of getting hit with fees if the only ground for appeal is lack of substantial evidence. www.bradfordbarthel.com 29 Published & Unpublished Opinions An appellate opinion issuing in a workers compensation case may be: Published Partially published Unpublished www.bradfordbarthel.com 30 15

Published & Unpublished Opinions Published Opinions To be published, an opinion must establish a new rule of law or resolve or create an apparent conflict in the law. Unpublished Opinions must not be cited or relied upon by a court or a party in any other action of proceedings www.bradfordbarthel.com 31 Petition for Writ of Mandate Authorized by LC 5955. Not frequently used. WCAB also has authority under LC 5309(a) to order a judge to try an issue, but can also be accomplished by petition for removal. A petition for removal is a prerequisite for petition for writ of mandate. (Brauer v. WCAB 62 CCC 1439). www.bradfordbarthel.com 32 16

Supreme Court Supreme Court Review Appellate Opinion & Disposition/writ granted Filed with Supreme Court Timeline: 40 days + 10 days to file (10 days if not) within ten (10) days following the finality of the appellate disposition (40 days after the filing of an appellate opinion, or ten days after the filing of an order denying a writ), the losing party may file a petition for review in the Supreme Court. www.bradfordbarthel.com 33 Grounds for Review by S. Ct. The Supreme Court may order review of a Court of Appeal decision: (1)When necessary to secure uniformity of decision or to settle an important question of law; (2)When the Court of Appeal lacked jurisdiction; (3)When the Court of Appeal decision lacked the concurrence of sufficient qualified justices; or (4)For the purpose of transferring the matter to the Court of Appeal for such proceedings as the Supreme Court may order. www.bradfordbarthel.com 34 17

Supreme Court Supreme Court has 60 days to grant the petition or extend on its own motion. If a petition is granted, the court may start the appellate process over again with oral arguments and issue an opinion and decision affirming, reversing or modifying the decision of the court of appeal. It s more common for the Supreme Court to transfer the matter back to the Court of Appeals with instructions to conduct further proceedings at their direction. www.bradfordbarthel.com 35 Contact Information: Louis Larres E-mail: llarres@bradfordbarthel.com Office: (559) 442-3602 Cell: (559) 259-4366 www.bradfordbarthel.com 36 18