Shepard s Editorial Analysis Definitions (Cases)

Similar documents
4.5 No Notice of Judgment or Order of Appellate Court; Effect on Time to File Certain Documents * * * * * *

United States Supreme Court Considering A California Appellate Court Opinion Invalidating A Class Action Arbitration Waiver

Paper 24 Tel: Entered: October 9, 2018 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

SOUTHWEST INTERTRIBAL COURT OF APPEALS RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE

Dwayne Roberts appeals an order denying petitions for writ of mandamus in

Chapter II BAY MILLS COURT OF APPEALS

Do-Overs: Overviewing the Various Mechanisms for Reevaluating an Issued Patent and How They Have Changed Over the Last Five Years +

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

No. SC-CV SUPREME COURT OF THE NAVAJO NATION. A.P., Minor Petitioner, Crownpoint Family Court, Respondent. OPINION

Supreme Court of Florida

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW IN THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT. B. Small number - about 200 out of 5,000 petitions for review filed

SIGNED AND ENTERED this 30th day of June, 2011.

Rule Change #1998(14)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

TRIBAL CODE CHAPTER 82: APPEALS

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

PATENT LAW. SAS Institute, Inc. v. Joseph Matal, Interim Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and ComplementSoft, LLC Docket No.

Rule 8.03 SUPREME COURT REVIEW OF COURT OF APPEALS DECISION

CASE NO. 1D S.P. seeks review of a non-final, postdependency order denying his motion

2015 Session (78th) CA SB53 R2 CA12. Conference Committee Amendment to (BDR 3-156) Senate Bill No. 53 Second Reprint

Chapter 157. Hearings and Appeals. Subchapter EE. Informal Review, Formal Review, and Review by State Office of Administrative Hearings

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

USA v. Frederick Banks

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Supreme Court of Florida

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. Administrative Order Gen

Supreme Court of Florida

Anatomy of an Appeal By Michelle May O Neil

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

2017 and entered on the docket on September 29, The relevant facts follow. have any sexual offender registration requirements.

CAN A PATENT ONCE ADJUDICATED TO BE INVALID BE RESURRECTED? RONALD A. CLAYTON Partner FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO NEW YORK, NEW YORK

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 07a0585n.06 Filed: August 14, Case No

NO CV. IN RE MARK CECIL PROVINE, Relator. Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus * * * NO.

Supreme Court of the United States

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNDERSTANDING THE APPELLATE PROCESS IN THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

TEXAS CRIMINAL DEFENSE FORMS ANNOTATED

POST GRANT REVIEW PROCEEDINGS IN THE PTO STEPHEN G. KUNIN PARTNER

STUTSON v. UNITED STATES. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the eleventh circuit

PROPOSED RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE AMENDMENT APPEAL PROCEEDINGS IN CRIMINAL CASES

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Office of the Clerk. After Opening a Case Pro Se Appellants (revised December 2012)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS

CHAPTER 15. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF GOVERNMENTAL DETERMINATIONS IN GENERAL

FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE

FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE TABLE OF CONTENTS

Keith Jennings v. R. Martinez

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Lawrence Walker v. Comm Social Security

Copr. West 2004 No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works

Reginald Castel v. Atty Gen USA

Paper 14 Tel: Entered: December 18, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

Microsoft Corp. v. i4i L.P. et al. U.S. Supreme Court (No )

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTLAW EDGE CHECKING CITATIONS IN KEYCITE QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE. Accessing KeyCite. Checking Cases and Administrative Decisions in KeyCite

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

This case is before this Court on Respondents' Motion to Dismiss Petitioner's BOC Petition For Review Of Final Agency Action.

3RD CIRCUIT LOCAL APPELLATE RULES Proposed amendments Page 1

America Invents Act (AIA) Post-Grant Proceedings

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Michigan Appellate Assigned Counsel System. Knowing Your Appellate Deadlines Court Rules and Procedure

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

Will the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences Rely Upon Dictionary Definitions Newly. Cited in Appeal Briefs? Answer: It Depends

Status Quo at the PTAB for Now: Supreme Court Makes No Change to IPR; Judicial Review and Claim Construction Standard Remain the Same

Submitted April 9, 2018 Decided April 23, 2018 Remanded by Supreme Court November 2, 2018 Resubmitted December 21, 2018 Decided January 15, 2019

Petition for Writ of Certiorari Denied March 24, 1993 COUNSEL

In the Supreme Court of the United States

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

SEC. 6. AIA: POST-GRANT REVIEW PROCEEDINGS

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

Federal Labor Laws. Paul K. Rainsberger, Director University of Missouri Labor Education Program Revised, June 2011

A The following shall be assigned to the appellate division:

Supreme Court of Florida

THE JOINT RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE FOR COURTS OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas

OPINIONS NONE PETITIONS FOR REHEARING NONE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO v. : T.C. NO. 09CR1012

No. 106,937 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. MATTHEW PAUL MARKOVICH, Appellant, RANDALL GREEN, et al., Appellees. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

Nevada Constitution Article 19 Section 1. Referendum for approval or disapproval of statute or resolution enacted by legislature. Sec. 2.

CASE NO. 1D Michael Ufferman of Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. Administrative Order Gen

Supreme Court of Florida

NC General Statutes - Chapter 7A 1

AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAW FOUNDATION

RULES AND STATUTES ON HABEAS CORPUS with Amendments and Additions in the ANTITERRORISM AND EFFECTIVE DEATH PENALTY ACT OF 1996

Michael Ufferman of the Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for Petitioner.

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

When is a ruling truly final?

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE June 2000 Session

FEDERAL CIRCUIT DECISIONS FOR WEEK ENDING June 19, 2015

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Adkins, Moylan,* Thieme,* JJ.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 8:11-cv JDW-EAJ. versus

In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO CV. VICTOR WOODARD, Appellant

Transcription:

Shepard s Editorial Analysis Definitions (Cases) http://www.lexisnexis.com/shepards/ Analysis a Ab Acq AcqR AD AG aj Amp AW AWR c cc CD CDW Definition On appeal, reconsideration or rehearing, the citing case affirms or adheres to the case you are The citing reference orders that an application for leave to appeal be held in abeyance pending resolution of another case or cases. The Commission acquiesces in the reasoning or result of the decision you are The Commission acquiesces in result only, and not in the reasoning employed to reach the result, in the decision you are The citing order denies allocatur in the case you are The citing order grants allocatur in the case you are The citing case involves the patent, copyright or trademark you are Shepardizing, but there is no holding that calls for a more specific editorial letter. The citing decision expands or extends to a different factual situation the statute, revenue ruling or revenue procedure you are The citing reference notes an application or motion for writ in the case you are The citing reference notes an application for writ of error in the case you are The citing opinion disagrees with the reasoning/result of the case you are Shepardizing, although the citing court may not have the authority to materially affect its precedential value. The citing case is related to the case you are Shepardizing, arising out of the same subject matter or involving the same parties. The citing order denies certiorari or review in the case you are The citing order denies writ of certiorari in the case you are

cf The citing reference notes that a certificate for review of the case you are Shepardizing has been filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. CG Clr CN cn The citing order by the U.S. Supreme Court grants certiorari in the case you are The citing decision clarifies the revenue ruling or revenue procedure you are The citing order by the U.S. Supreme Court denies certiorari in the case you are The citing reference indicates that registration for the trademark you are Shepardizing has been canceled. co Corr CS D d DAF DAP De de dedf dep Depub The citing reference indicates that a correction certificate has been issued for the patent you are The citing reference corrects an error in the regulation you are The citing order by the U.S. Supreme Court dismisses certiorari in the case you are The citing case dismisses an appeal from the case you are The citing case differs from the case you are Shepardizing, either involving dissimilar facts or requiring a different application of the law. The citing reference notes the filing of a direct appeal in the case you are The citing order dismisses, by agreement of the parties, application for writ of error in the case you are The citing case denies review or rehearing of the case you are Shepardizing has been dedicated to the public. Shepardizing has been dedicated to the public and disclaimed. The citing reference indicates that certain claims of the patent you are Shepardizing have been dedicated to the public.

df dfde dfg dfp DG The citing reference indicates that a disclaimer has been entered as to the patent you are Shepardizing has been disclaimed and dedicated to the public. Shepardizing has been disclaimed and is owned by the U.S. government. The citing reference indicates that a disclaimer has been entered as to certain claims of the patent you are The citing decision holds for the Government in a dispute concerning the Code section you are DGp The citing decision holds in part for the Government in a dispute concerning the Code section you are DJC The citing order dismisses application for writ of error in the case you are Shepardizing, upholding the judgment as correct. In Texas SC cases, SC not satisfied that opinion of court of appeals is correct in all respects. DMA DO Dp DT The citing order dismisses, on motion of the applicant, the application for writ in the case you are The citing order dismisses, with opinion, an appeal from the case you are The citing case dismisses in part an appeal from the case you are The citing decision holds for the taxpayer in a dispute concerning the Code section you are DTp The citing decision holds in part for the taxpayer in a dispute concerning the Code section you are DWB The citing order dismisses, for want of bond, the application for writ in the case you are DWJ The citing order dismisses, for want of jurisdiction, application for writ of error in the case you are DWP The citing order dismisses, for want of prosecution, the application for writ in the case you are

e eg egp ER The citing opinion interprets or clarifies the case you are Shepardizing in a significant way. The citing reference indicates that an extension has been granted as to the patent you are The citing reference indicates that an extension has been granted as to certain claims of the patent you are The citing order refuses application for writ of error in the case you are In Texas SC cases, SC is satisfied judgment of court of appeals is correct. er The citing reference indicates that an extension has been refused as to the patent you are f G g GCRE The citing opinion relies on the case you are Shepardizing as controlling or persuasive authority. The citing order grants application for writ of error in the case you are Shepardizing is owned by the U.S. government. The citing order grants, on court s own motion, petition for discretionary review in the case you are GP Gr Grtd h The citing reference grants review of the case you are Shepardizing, and orders that it remain published. The citing reference grants review or certiorari in the case you are The citing reference grants review or rehearing of, and depublishes, the case you are The citing case differs from the case you are Shepardizing, but the citing court reconciles the difference or inconsistency in reaching its decision. HBCD The citing order refuses to issue a writ of habeas corpus in the case you are HCD The citing order denies, without written opinion, application for writ of habeas corpus in the case you are HCDO The citing order denies, with written opinion, application for writ of habeas corpus in the case you are

HCG HCR HCReq id idp Imp j The citing order grants application for writ of habeas corpus in the case you are The citing order returns, marked no action, application for writ of habeas corpus in the case you are The citing reference notes an application for writ of habeas corpus in the case you are The citing case holds that the patent, copyright or trademark you are Shepardizing is infringed. The citing case holds that certain claims of the patent, copyright or trademark you are Shepardizing are infringed. The citing reference adds an improvement to the patent you are A dissenting opinion cites the case you are L The citing opinion restricts the application of the Shepardized case, finding that its reasoning applies only in specific, limited circumstances. LD Li Ln Lnp LnVp m MA MD Mden The citing order denies leave to appeal or application for leave to appeal in the case you are limited and infringed. limited and not infringed. are Shepardizing are limited and not infringed. are Shepardizing are limited, not infringed, and void, invalid or unenforceable. On appeal, reconsideration or rehearing, the citing case modifies or changes in some way, including affirmance in part and reversal in part, the case you are The citing order awards writ of mandamus in the case you are The citing order dismisses application for writ of mandamus in the case you are Shepardizing The citing order denies application for writ of mandamus in the case you are

MG MGP MI mi MO MR MRP MWR nd ndp Noacq The citing order grants application for writ of mandamus in the case you are The citing order grants in part application for writ of mandamus in the case you are The citing order declares that writ of mandamus will issue in the case you are The citing reference notes that mandate in the case you are Shepardizing has issued from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. The citing order overrules motion for writ of mandamus in the case you are The citing order refuses application for writ of mandamus in the case you are The citing order refuses in part application for writ of mandamus in the case you are The citing reference notes application for writ of mandamus in the case you are The citing case holds that the patent, copyright or trademark you are Shepardizing is not infringed. are Shepardizing are not infringed. The Commissioner refuses to acquiesce in the reasoning or result of the decision you are Np The citing reference orders the Reporter of Decisions not to publish the case you are Nr The citing reference concludes that the decision you are Shepardizing is not recommended for publication. Nu o Op Ori p The citing case nullifies the case you are The citing case expressly overrules or disapproves all or part of the case you are The citing reference is the original opinion in the case you are Shepardizing, reprinted for tracking purposes pending review, and is thus not citable. The citing patent is the original issue of the reissue patent you are The citing case relies on the case you are Shepardizing by describing it as on all fours or parallel to the citing case.

pd PDA PDE The citing reference notes that a petition in the case you are Shepardizing has been denied by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. The citing order dismisses, by agreement of the parties, petition for discretionary review in the case you are The citing order denies petition for discretionary review in the case you are In Texas SC cases, SC is not satisfied opinion of court of appeals is correct in all respects. PDJC PDRD PDRG PDRR PDRR PDWJ The citing order dismisses petition for discretionary review in the case you are Shepardizing, upholding the judgment as correct. In Texas SC cases, SC not satisfied that opinion of court of appeals is correct in all respects. The citing order dismisses petition for discretionary review in the case you are The citing order grants petition for discretionary review in the case you are The citing order refuses petition for discretionary review in the case you are In Texas SC cases, the court of appeals opinion in the case has the same precedential value as an opinion of the SC. The citing order refuses petition for discretionary review in the case you are The citing order dismisses, for want of jurisdiction, petition for discretionary review in the case you are pex PFRA PFRD Shepardizing has expired for failure to pay maintenance fee The citing order abates a petition for review by the Texas Supreme Court in the case you are Shepardizing because of the bankruptcy filing of the petitioner or pending judgment on a settlement agreement. The citing order dismisses a petition for review by the Texas Supreme Court in the case you are PFRE The citing order denies a petition for review by the Texas Supreme Court in the case you are PFRG The citing order grants a petition for review by the Texas Supreme Court in the case you are

PFRI PFRR PFRW The citing order reinstates a petition for review that was previously abated by the Texas Supreme Court in the case you are The citing order refuses a petition for review by the Texas Supreme Court in the case you are The Court of Appeals opinion that you are Shepardizing has the same precedential value as an opinion of the Supreme Court. The citing order withdraws a petition for review by the Texas Supreme Court in the case you are pg PIG PLR pr The citing reference notes that a petition in the case you are Shepardizing has been granted by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces The citing order sets aside grant of review and dismisses petition or denies or refuses review in the case you are The citing letter ruling incorporates the text of the letter ruling you are The citing decision or order involves the docket or rulemaking number you are PR The citing reference notes petition for discretionary review has been filed in the case you are PRD The citing order denies rehearing of a petition for discretionary review in the case you are PRG The citing order grants rehearing of a petition for discretionary review in the case you are PRNE PROM PRRG PRRO The citing order refuses petition for discretionary review in the case you are Shepardizing, finding no reversible error. In Texas SC cases, SC not satisfied opinion of court of appeals correct in all respects. The citing order refuses, for want of merit, petition for discretionary review in the case you are In Texas SC cases, SC not satisfied opinion of court of appeals correct in all respects. The citing order grants a motion for rehearing on a petition for review by the Texas Supreme Court in the case you are The citing order overrules a motion fro rehearing on a petition for review by the Texas Supreme Court in the case you are

PRUF The citing order refuses, as untimely filed, petition for discretionary review in the case you are PRWP PVWM The citing order refuses, without prejudice, petition for discretionary review in the case you are The citing order grants, without reference to the merits, a petition for review by the Texas Supreme Court and vacates judgment in the case you are PWRM The citing order grants, without reference to the merits, petition for discretionary review and remands the case you are Shepardizing for rendition of judgment according to a settlement agreement of the parties. q The citing opinion questions the continuing validity or precedential value of the case you are Shepardizing because of intervening circumstances, including judicial or legislative overruling. r On appeal, reconsideration or rehearing, the citing case reverses the case you are RE Re Recon ReD Ref ReG RN RNRE The citing reference orders the Reporter of Decisions to publish the case you are Shepardizing, reversing a previous depublication order. The citing patent is the reissue of the patent you are The citing decision or order reconsiders the decision or order you are The citing order denies rehearing or reconsideration in the case you are The citing decision or order involves the docket or project number you are The citing order grants rehearing or reconsideration in the case you are The citing order by the U.S. Supreme Court denies rehearing in the case you are The citing order refuses application for writ of error in the case you are Shepardizing, finding no reversible error. In Texas SC cases, SC not satisfied opinion of court of appeals correct in all respects.

Rpl rr The citing decision or order replaces the decision or order you are Shepardizing has been removed from the register. RS RWM Rx s S SLR SO SP The citing order by the U.S. Supreme Court dismisses rehearing in the case you are The citing order refuses, for want of merit, application for writ of error in the case you are In Texas SC cases, SC not satisfied opinion of court of appeals correct in all respects. The citing reference indicates results of reexamination for the patent you are The citing case involves the same litigation as the case you are Shepardizing, but at a different stage of the proceedings. On appeal, reconsideration or rehearing, the citing case supersedes or is substituted for the case you are The citing letter ruling is a subsequent letter ruling issued in the case you are letter ruling The citing reference is an order of the court (other than grants and denials of leave to appeal from the Court of Appeals) of general interest to the bench and bar of the state. A special panel of Court of Appeals judges has convened to resolve a conflict between the citing reference and one or more other Court of Appeals decisions. St TD TG US v VaL The citing reference orders that the precedential effect of the cited case be stayed pending consideration of the application for leave to appeal. The citing order denies transfer in the case you are The citing order grants transfer in the case you are Appeal or certiorari is pending before the U.S. Supreme Court in the case you are The citing case vacates or withdraws the case you are valid and limited.

Vap Vi Vid Vidp ViL Vip Vld Vn Vnd Vndp Vnp Void Voidp Vpdf W WD WEDR are Shepardizing are valid. valid and infringed. void, invalid or unenforceable and/or infringed. are Shepardizing are void, invalid or unenforceable and/or infringed. valid, infringed and limited. are Shepardizing are valid and infringed. valid. valid and not infringed. void, invalid or unenforceable and/or not infringed are Shepardizing are void, invalid or unenforceable and/or not infringed. are Shepardizing are valid and not infringed. void, invalid or unenforceable. are Shepardizing are void, invalid or unenforceable. The citing reference notes that the patent you are Shepardizing is held void, invalid or unenforceable in part and a disclaimer has been filed. The citing decision or order withdraws the decision or order you are The citing order denies application for writ of error in the case you are In Texas SC cases, SC is not satisfied opinion of court of appeals is correct in all respects. The citing order dismisses writ of error in the case you are

WHCD WPD The citing order dismisses application for writ of habeas corpus in the case you are The citing order denies, application for writ of prohibition in the case you are WPDO WRD WRG WWRM The citing order denies, with written opinion, application for writ of prohibition in the case you are The citing order denies rehearing of an application for writ in the case you are The citing order grants rehearing of an application for writ in the case you are The citing order grants, without reference to the merits, application for writ of error and remands the case you are Shepardizing for rendition of judgment according to a settlement agreement of the parties.