AP EUROPEAN HISTORY 2011 SCORING GUIDELINES (Form B)

Similar documents
AP EUROPEAN HISTORY 2007 SCORING GUIDELINES (Form B)

AP World History 2013 Scoring Guidelines

AP EUROPEAN HISTORY 2007 SCORING GUIDELINES (Form B)

AP European History 2007 Scoring Guidelines Form B

World History 2014 Scoring Guidelines

AP United States History 2005 Scoring Commentary Form B

AP COMPARATIVE GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS 2013 SCORING GUIDELINES

AP European History 2004 Scoring Guidelines

AP World History. Sample Student Responses and Scoring Commentary. Inside: R Long Essay Question 3. R Scoring Guideline.

Directions: Read the documents in Part A and answer the questions after each document. Then, read the directions for Part B and write your essay.

Scoring Guidelines and Notes for Long Essay Question

AP UNITED STATES HISTORY 2001 SCORING GUIDELINES. Question 5

AP EUROPEAN HISTORY 2008 SCORING GUIDELINES (Form B)

Time Frame: 1 day (2 days with essay extension)

AP United States History

GRADE 5 ELEMENTARY-LEVEL SOCIAL STUDIES TEST

Document-Based Question

AP United States History SCORING GUIDELINES

AP European History. Sample Student Responses and Scoring Commentary. Inside: Short Answer Question 3. Scoring Guideline.

Introduction. Changes in Skills

AP COMPARATIVE GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS 2009 SCORING GUIDELINES

AP United States History

AP European History, Unit 3: Part I: The Isms: Conservative Order and the Challenges of Reform, Period 3,

AP COMPARATIVE GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS 2008 SCORING GUIDELINES

Student Performance Q&A:

Examiners Report June GCE History 6HI03 B

AP COMPARATIVE GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS 2012 SCORING GUIDELINES

Scoring Notes for Secondary Social Studies CBAs (Grades 6 12)

AP History DBQ LEQ SEQ Rubrics. Understanding and correct use of the following guidelines will help ensure your success on AP History exams.

Grade 7 Social Studies Sample Task Women s Rights Movement

Curricular Requirement

Scoring Notes for Secondary Social Studies CBAs (Grades 6 12)

AP European History. Sample Student Responses and Scoring Commentary. Inside: Short Answer Question 1. Scoring Guideline.

Nine Historical Thinking Skills (HTS)

AP Comparative Government and Politics

foundation for an effective argument Argument Essay: The Evidential Block

AP Comparative Government and Politics

AP UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS 2008 SCORING GUIDELINES

Examiners Report June GCE History 6HI03 B

2006 Assessment Report Australian History GA 3: Written examination

AP United States History

UNIVERSITY OF OF MALTA SECONDARY EDUCATION CERTIFICATE SEC HISTORY MAY 2015 EXAMINERS REPORT

Examiners Report June GCE History 6HI03 D

I. A.P UNITED STATES HISTORY

AP Comparative Government and Politics

AP United States History

Student Performance Q&A:

AP US History Unit 2 Skills Workbook

AP United States Government and Politics

AP COMPARATIVE GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS 2011 SCORING GUIDELINES

A Correlation of Prentice Hall World History Survey Edition 2014 To the New York State Social Studies Framework Grade 10

Examiners Report June 2010

Are defenders of sweatshops simply relying on textbook

Brussels Study Tour 2016 Post-Secondary Faculty Course Module Planning Template Name: Bianka Stumpf

Mr. Lee s Writing Packet #APUSHMEOFFACLIFF

DBQ: Document Based Question (25% of your AP score)

Claim, Warrant, Impact

TO: GENERAL EDUCATION COMMITTEE FROM: ASSSESSMENT COMMITTEE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY. RE: Response to GEC report on Quadrennial Review

Special Topics in Political Theory / Methods: British and American Political Thought. after class and by appointment

Name Period Date. Grade 9, Unit 3 Pre-assessment. High Stakes for Children in Immigration Reform. By: Alison Burns

Writing in AP U.S. History

AP United States Government and Politics

ESSAY STRUCTURE INTRODUCTION PARAGRAPH (2-3 SENTENCE INTRODUCING YOUR TOPIC; THESIS STATEMENT)

Warsaw, 20 October Opinion Nr.: TERR - KAZ/010/2004 (TK)

AP Comparative Government & Politics 2003 Scoring Guidelines

CARIBBEAN EXAMINATIONS COUNCIL

Where does an essay start? Absolutely Must Include:

World History SGM Review Ch 1+2 Review Ch 5 Review Ch 6 Review Multiple Choice

Vocabulary Match-Up. Name Date Period Workbook Activity

European History

ProQuest Legislative Insight Basic Research Guide May 2012 Thomas Cooper Library & Coleman Karesh Law Library University of South Carolina

Student Performance Q&A:

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION

US History. The timeline and excerpts contain information related to the Watergate Scandal.

Contract Administration, Part 3: Contract Interpretation Guidelines and Best Practices

Examiners Report June GCE History 6HI03 E

Paul W. Werth. Review Copy

AP World History. Scoring Guidelines

9697 HISTORY 9697/32 Paper 32, maximum raw mark 100

Chapter 23 Test- The French Revolution & Napoleon

Hamburger Helper. Essay Help for FSA Monday

Examiners Report June GCE Government and Politics 6GP01 01

PREVIEW If men are not angels, what are they? 2. Why are governments necessary?

DBQ Graphic Organizer

Economic Systems Continuum Activity

AP COMPARATIVE GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS 2010 SCORING GUIDELINES

Justine Bendel, James Harrison *

Questions of Periodization. The Era of European Dominance

CONTENT STANDARD INDICATORS SKILLS ASSESSMENT VOCABULARY. Identify a man or woman who made a significant impact in the changing.

Introduction to Commentaries on Primary Source Materials from Environmental Courts. By Amy Mehta 1

AP EUROPEAN SURVIVAL GUIDE

Social Studies Sample Exam Form A Provincial Examination Answer Key

Part III DOCUMENT BASED QUESTION

World History Chapter 24

AP Euro Unit 9/C23 Assignment: Ideologies and Upheavals,

Mr. Meighen AP World History Summer Assignment

DICTATORSHIPS IN THE FORMER SOVIET UNION: TRANSITIONAL MISHAP OR INTENTIONAL DESIGN?

AP UNITED STATES HISTORY 2006 SCORING GUIDELINES. Question 4

APEH Comprehensive Review Study Guide Part 2

Understanding factors that influence L1-visa outcomes in US

Transcription:

AP EUROPEAN HISTORY 2011 SCORING GUIDELINES (Form B) Question 6 Analyze the extent to which conservatives in continental Europe were successful in achieving their goals in the years between 1815 and 1851. Draw your examples from at least two states. 9 8 points Clear thesis articulates the extent to which the conservative goals were met in at least two states. Organization is clear and effective (e.g., juxtaposes developments in at least two countries side by side). Essay is well balanced and recognizes at least two states attempts to achieve conservative goals. All major assertions are supported by multiple pieces of relevant evidence. Essay contains strong historical analysis rather than just factual narrative. Essay may contain some errors that do not detract from the argument. 7 6 points Thesis articulates the extent to which conservative goals were met in at least two states. Organization is clear and effective (e.g., juxtaposes developments in at least two countries side by side). Essay is well balanced and recognizes at least two states attempts to achieve conservative goals. All major assertions are supported by several pieces of relevant evidence. Essay contains some analysis, though not fully articulated. Essay may contain some errors that do not detract from the argument. 5 4 points Attempted thesis either addresses just one state or addresses two or more states collectively, without specificity regarding the extent to which conservative goals were achieved in either state. Organization is clear but shows some imbalance (e.g., may focus on one country more than the other). Discussion is not balanced in regard to different conservative goals or individual countries. Major assertions are supported by at least one piece of evidence that demonstrates conservative reactions. Essay contains primarily factual narrative with little or no analysis. Essay may contain some errors. 3 2 points No thesis is or attempted thesis just restates the prompt. Organization is unclear and ineffective. Essay shows serious imbalance. There is little or no supporting evidence or the intended supporting evidence is not clearly linked to the question (e.g., may outline a narrative of the events surrounding the Congress of Vienna without connecting them to conservatism and its political goals). Essay may contain several errors that detract from the argument. 2011 The College Board.

AP EUROPEAN HISTORY 2011 SCORING GUIDELINES (Form B) Question 6 (continued) 1 0 points Thesis is missing. Essay is poorly organized. Essay is off task or not responsive to the prompt. There is little or no supporting evidence. Essay contains major errors. 2011 The College Board.

AP EUROPEAN HISTORY 2011 SCORING COMMENTARY (Form B) Question 6 Sample: 6A Score: 9 The essay presents a clear and well-written thesis that articulates the extent to which conservatives achieved their goals in three states: France, Russia and Austria. The organization is clear, and the coverage is well balanced among the three countries chosen. The essay demonstrates an impressive command of a wide range of relevant events and dates, some of them fairly obscure. Each assertion is supported by multiple pieces of evidence. The analysis of the extent to which conservative goals were achieved in each of the three countries is insightful and sophisticated. The essay s analysis of events in three, instead of the required two, countries, the impressive level of historical detail, and the overall level of sophistication all contributed to earn the maximum score of 9. Sample: 6B Score: 5 The introductory paragraph lays out the goals of conservatives (represented by Metternich) in the post-1815 period, but the concluding paragraph develops more fully an acceptable thesis that articulates the extent to which conservatives were successful in achieving their goals. The body paragraphs offer discussion of events in two countries (France and the Habsburg Empire); the supporting evidence is particularly strong for France. The analysis tends to overstate the case for conservative success, glossing over the July Revolution in France and the 1848 revolutions in both France and the Habsburg Empire, and not explicitly addressing the question in terms of evaluating the extent to which conservative goals were achieved in the two countries. The essay offers a very detailed treatment of the Congress of Vienna that is only weakly linked to the main argument. The essay did not earn higher than a score of 5 because it is mostly narrative in nature, with relatively little analysis, and does not fully address the issue of extent. However, the numerous specific examples and relatively well-developed thesis in the conclusion merited higher than a score of 4. Sample: 6C Score: 1 The attempted thesis in the introductory paragraph outlines, in general terms, one goal of some European conservatives, but it does not address the question of the extent to which conservatives were successful. The attempt at recapitulating the thesis in the concluding paragraph is counterfactual in its certainty. The discussion for both France and Russia is confused, off topic and riddled with factual errors and misinterpretations; it also shows a very shaky grasp of chronology (for example, in discussing the spread of communism in Russia). The essay earned a score of 1 on the strength of a passing reference to the 1830 and 1848 revolutions in France. 2011 The College Board.