Case 1:14-cv PJK-GBW Document 59 Filed 04/21/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Similar documents
Case: 4:14-cv ERW Doc. #: 74 Filed: 07/13/15 Page: 1 of 9 PageID #: 523. Case No.: 4:14-cv-00159

Case 1:14-cv CMA-KMT Document 1191 Filed 01/23/19 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 7

Case 8:11-cv JST-JPR Document Filed 08/16/13 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:5240

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 117 Filed: 08/12/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:706

ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, DIRECTING NOTICE, AND SCHEDULING FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

Case 0:11-cv CMA Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/18/2015 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case: 2:13-cv CMV Doc #: 92 Filed: 11/14/18 Page: 1 of 6 PAGEID #: 812 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case: 4:16-cv JAR Doc. #: 97 Filed: 12/13/18 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 2279

Case 4:17-cv ALM Document 42-1 Filed 04/03/18 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 337

Case 2:03-cv RCJ-PAL Document 2907 Filed 06/05/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case: 2:13-cv CMV Doc #: 86 Filed: 07/13/18 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 606 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 266 Filed: 10/05/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:5588

Case 1:17-cv RDB Document 17 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 6. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND Baltimore Division ANSWER

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. ("Denbury" or "Defendant") shares pursuant to the merger of

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case: 4:16-cv ERW Doc. #: 105 Filed: 05/15/18 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 915

Case 1:15-cv RWS Document 45-2 Filed 08/11/16 Page 7 of 74

Case 2:17-cv GAM Document 56 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 3:18-cv DMS-MDD Document 256 Filed 10/09/18 PageID.4031 Page 1 of 6

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, AT INDEPENDENCE

Case 2:14-cv JCC Document 98 Filed 11/24/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 2:11-cv JLL-MAH Document 69 Filed 02/22/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID: 739

Case 3:15-cv RBL Document 214 Filed 05/16/18 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 186 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 11. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:314

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. TJ H Case No. 5:15-cv ~jc~-gjs

Case 1:09-cv RB-RHS Document 139 Filed 11/01/13 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case 3:17-cv JAG Document 41 Filed 02/21/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 258

Case Case 1:10-cv AKH Document Document Filed 03/16/15 03/13/15 Page 11of9

Case 3:13-cv BAS-RBB Document Filed 04/28/16 Page 2 of 33 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 5:15-md LHK Document 946 Filed 01/26/18 Page 1 of 9

Case: 4:16-cv ERW Doc. #: 95 Filed: 12/15/17 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 734

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:06-cv WMN Document 270 Filed 03/02/10 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. Plaintiff, j Judge: Hon. Joan M. Lewis ) ) )

Case 2:16-cv RSL Document 84 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 7

Case 2:17-cv JFB-SIL Document 16 Filed 07/14/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 71

Case 3:17-cv M Document 64 Filed 11/22/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID 659

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OFPENNSVLVAJ'ELA ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

Case 3:09-cv JPG-PMF Document 47 Filed 01/11/11 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #466

Case 2:15-cv LDD Document 54 Filed 12/12/16 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:15-md AJT-TRJ Document 1524 Filed 06/15/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID# 17458

Case 2:03-cv RCJ-PAL Document 2795 Filed 02/09/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Case 2:17-cv JNP-BCW Document 29 Filed 01/08/19 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 576 Filed: 07/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:22601

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:15-cv JMA-SIL Document 50-1 Filed 12/29/16 Page 1 of 56 PageID #: 287 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 52 Filed: 12/23/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:463

Case 1:13-cv RHB Doc #14 Filed 04/17/14 Page 1 of 8 Page ID#88

Case 1:15-cv WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14

Case 8:14-cv JSM-CPT Document 313 Filed 12/13/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID 5935

Case 9:14-cv WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No. 8:13-cv-2428-T-33TBM ORDER

ckdlz.tca At ("Defendant") under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA"), 47 U.S.C.

Case 1:10-cv ER-SRF Document 825 Filed 07/10/18 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

SUSAN DOHERTY and DWIGHT SIMONSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. l:10-cv nlh-kmw

Case 2:13-md MMB Document 427 Filed 07/18/16 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 88 Filed: 07/06/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1135

8:16-cv JFB-FG3 Doc # 168 Filed: 04/13/17 Page 1 of 12 - Page ID # 2440 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS SETTLEMENT, DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF CLASS NOTICE AND SCHEDULING A FINAL FAIRNESS HEARING

Case 1:15-cv JFK Document 114 Filed 11/05/18 Page 1 of 12 Case 1:15-cv JFK Document Filed 10/30/18 Page 2 of 13

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. No. MDL PHX DGC. IN RE: Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:90-cv JLK Document 2458 Filed 03/30/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Case 2:16-cv JMA-SIL Document 5 Filed 12/27/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 88 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff,

Case 1:16-cv JG Document 61 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/09/2017 Page 1 of 20

Case 3:12-cv DRH-SCW Document 942 Filed 09/04/18 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #40056

Case 0:11-cv RNS Document 149 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2014 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : : :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION. v. Case No: 2:15-cv-629-FtM-99CM ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 25 Filed: 10/18/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:156 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 3:16-cv SI Document 39 Filed 04/17/17 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. FAIRNESS HEARING: RULE 23(e) FINDINGS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SHARON COBB, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,,

EXHIBIT 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. ORDER This matter came before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion for Modification of

1631 Zimmerman Trail 319 Maverick St. Billings, MT San Antonio, TX T: (406) T: (210) F: (406) F: (210)

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:12-cv GBD Document 47 Filed 01/19/16 Page 1 of 13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 9:15-cv KAM Document 167 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/19/2017 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 4:10-cv YGR Document Filed 06/17/16 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:15-cv ELR Document 60 Filed 09/08/16 Page 1 of 21

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:16-CV MHC

Transcription:

Case 1:14-cv-00130-PJK-GBW Document 59 Filed 04/21/15 Page 1 of 6 Jacqueline Jones, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO vs. Plaintiff, Case No. 1:14-cv-00130-PJK-RHS I.Q. Data International, Inc. Defendant. ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS SETTLEMENT The parties to this matter reached a proposed settlement, and accordingly seek preliminary approval of their proposed settlement. This Court heard argument on the plaintiff s unopposed motion to preliminarily approve the parties class action settlement filed March 9, 2015 (Doc. 53) on Thursday, April 16, 2015. Having considered the parties motion, this Court preliminarily approves the parties proposed settlement. The Court also preliminarily finds that this matter meets the requirements for class certification under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. See Shook v. El Paso Cnty., 386 F.3d 963, 971 (10th Cir. 2004) ( In determining the propriety of a class action, the question is not whether the plaintiff or plaintiffs have stated a cause of action or will prevail on the merits, but rather whether the requirements of Rule 23 are met. ). This Court further finds that it may finally approve the parties proposed settlement, as it is fair, adequate, and reasonable, and because the parties reached their proposed agreement as a result of intensive, non-collusive, arms-length negotiations. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(e)(2); Jones v. Nuclear Pharmacy, Inc., 741 F.2d 322, 324 (10th Cir. 1984) ( In exercising its discretion, the trial court must approve a settlement if it is fair, reasonable and adequate. ). 1

Case 1:14-cv-00130-PJK-GBW Document 59 Filed 04/21/15 Page 2 of 6 This Court will hold a fairness hearing on Monday, September 21, 2015, at 10:00 a.m., in the Rio Grande Courtroom (Third Floor) of the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico, Albuquerque Division, located at 333 Lomas Blvd. N.W., Albuquerque, NM 87102, to determine whether this Court should finally approve the parties proposed settlement, and to resolve all related matters. This Court approves, as to form and content, the parties proposed notice of class action settlement, found at Doc. 53-1 at 17-23 and Doc. 57-1 with the following additions: (1) time to file a claim or opt out, (2) designated website address, and (3) time, date, and location of the final fairness hearing. This Court orders that the notice of class action settlement must be distributed as follows: Not later than thirty days following the Preliminary Approval Date The ILYM Group, Inc. ( ILYM ), will mail the Class Notice and a claim form to each Class Member at the most current addresses reflected in Defendant s records for each Class Member. Before mailing the Class Notice and a claim form ILYM will confirm and, if necessary, update the addresses for the Class Members through the standard methodology it currently uses to update addresses, including attempting to identify the name and address of each Class Member based on the telephone number identified for each Class Member. The envelopes in which ILYM mails the Class Notice and a claim form to the Class Members must include a notation requesting address correction. If any notice is returned with a new address ILYM must resend the Class Notice and a claim form to the new address. For any Class Member whose Class Notice and claim form is returned without a forwarding address, ILYM must run the Class Member s name through a national change of address database in an effort to obtain a good address. If ILYM obtains a new address by doing so it must send the 2

Case 1:14-cv-00130-PJK-GBW Document 59 Filed 04/21/15 Page 3 of 6 Class Notice and a claim form to the new address. ILYM is not responsible for the postal service s failure to timely deliver the Class Notice and a claim form to a particular Class Member. ILYM will not have any obligation to resend any Class Notice and claim form that is not returned by the postal service before the Final Fairness Hearing. Not later than thirty days following the Preliminary Approval Date, ILYM will build and maintain a dedicated website (www. jonesiqtcpasettlement.com) that includes downloadable information and documents necessary to file a claim. At a minimum, the downloadable information and documents must include the Settlement Agreement, the Class Notice, a claim form, the Order Preliminarily Approving the Class Settlement, Plaintiff s class action complaint, and when filed, the Final Order and Judgment. This Court finds that the parties proposed notice of class action settlement, and the ordered distribution thereof, meets the requirements of due process under the Constitution and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e), that it is the best practicable notice under the circumstances, and that it constitutes due and sufficient notice to all persons entitled to notice of class action settlement. This Court finds that the parties proposed notice of class action settlement is adequate and will give all class members sufficient information to enable them to make informed decisions as to the parties proposed settlement, and the right to object to, or opt-out of, it. See DeJulius v. New England Health Care Emps. Pension Fund, 429 F.3d 935, 944 (10th Cir. 2005) ( [O]ur precedent focuses upon whether the district court gave the best notice practicable under the circumstances including individual notice to all members who can be identified through reasonable effort. ) (quoting In re Integra Realty Res., Inc., 262 F.3d 1089, 1110 (10th Cir. 2001)). 3

Case 1:14-cv-00130-PJK-GBW Document 59 Filed 04/21/15 Page 4 of 6 For purposes of effectuating the parties proposed settlement, this Court preliminarily certifies the following settlement class: All persons and entities throughout the United States (1) to whom I.Q. Data International, Inc. made or caused to be made calls, (2) directed to a number assigned to a unique cellular telephone, by (3) using an automatic telephone dialing system or an artificial or prerecorded voice, (4) from February 11, 2010 through February 11, 2014. Excluded from the Class are: a. Any person who is subject to an already existing and applicable release; b. Any person who is deceased; c. Any person who has filed for bankruptcy protections under Title 11 of the United States Code; and d. Any person who timely mails a request to exclude himself or herself from the Class. Also for purposes of effectuating the parties proposed settlement, this Court appoints Jacqueline Jones as a class representative, and the following attorneys and law firm as class counsel: Aaron D. Radbil Michael L. Greenwald Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC 5550 Glades Rd., Suite 500 Boca Raton, FL 33431 See Esposito v. Deatrick & Spies, P.S.C., No. 7:13-CV-1416 GLS/TWD, 2015 WL 390392, at *2 (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 28, 2015) ( [T]he Court certifies... Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC as Class Counsel. ); Green v. Dressman Benzinger Lavelle, PSC, No. 1:14-CV-00142-SJD, 2015 WL 223764, at *2 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 16, 2015) (... Greenwald Davidson PLLC is certified as Class Counsel. ); Donnelly v. EquityExperts.org, LLC, No. 4:13-CV-10017-TGB, 2015 WL 249522, at *2 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 14, 2015) ([T]he Court certifies... Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC as 4

Case 1:14-cv-00130-PJK-GBW Document 59 Filed 04/21/15 Page 5 of 6 Class Counsel. ); Ritchie v. Van Ru Credit Corp., No. 2:12-CV-01714-PHX-SM, 2014 WL 3955268, at *2 (D. Ariz. Aug. 13, 2014) ([T]he Court certifies... Greenwald Davidson PLLC as Class Counsel. ). Any class member who wishes to exclude himself or herself from the class action settlement must mail a written request for exclusion to Class Counsel and to counsel for Defendant, postmarked no more than ninety days after the Preliminary Approval Date. Through a request for exclusion, a Class Member must include his or her: a. Full name; b. Address; c. Telephone number; and d. A statement that he or she wishes to be excluded from the class action settlement. Any Class Member who submits a valid and timely request for exclusion will neither be bound by the terms of this Agreement, nor receive any of the benefits of this Agreement Any class member who wishes to object to the class action settlement must mail a written notice of objection to Class Counsel, to counsel for Defendant, and to the court, postmarked no more than ninety days after the Preliminary Approval Date. Through his or her notice of objection, a Class Member must include his or her: a. Full name; b. Address; c. Telephone number; d. A statement of the objection; e. A detailed description of the facts underlying the objection; f. A detailed description of the legal authorities that support each objection; 5

Case 1:14-cv-00130-PJK-GBW Document 59 Filed 04/21/15 Page 6 of 6 g. A statement noting whether the Class Member intends to appear at the fairness hearing; h. A list of all witnesses that the Class Member intends to call by live testimony, deposition testimony, or affidavit or declaration testimony, and i. A list of exhibits that the Class Member intends to present at the Final Fairness Hearing. Class Members who do not submit a valid and timely objection will be barred from seeking review of the proposed class action settlement by appeal, or otherwise. This order should not be construed as, or deemed to be, evidence of a presumption, implication, concession, or admission by Defendant concerning (1) any alleged liability, fault, or wrongdoing; (2) the appropriateness of any measure of alleged loss or damages; or (3) the appropriateness of class certification for any purposes other than settlement. If the parties settlement agreement is terminated pursuant to its terms, or if this Court does not finally approve the parties proposed settlement, Plaintiff and Defendant will be returned to the position they were in prior to execution of their settlement agreement, with the same status quo rights and interests as they had prior to execution their settlement agreement. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 21, 2015. /s/ Paul Kelly, Jr. United States Circuit Judge Sitting by designation 6