The State of Qatar institutes proceedings against the United Arab Emirates and requests the Court to indicate provisional measures

Similar documents
Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Qatar v. United Arab Emirates)

Immunities and Criminal Proceedings (Equatorial Guinea v. France)

No. 2012/23 16 July Questions relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite (Belgium v. Senegal)

In its Judgment, which is final and without appeal, the Court

Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan: New Zealand intervening).

ESTABLISHMENT OF AN INTERNATIONAL COORDINATION COMMITTEE (ICC) FOR PREAH VIHEAR TEMPLE, INCLUDED IN THE WORLD HERITAGE LIST SUMMARY

Jadhav Case (India v. Pakistan) Provisional Measures

No. 2011/36 29 November Visit by H.E. Mr. Danilo Türk, President of the Republic of Slovenia, to the International Court of Justice

No. 2011/21 15 July Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy) Application for permission to intervene submitted by Greece

No. 2010/25 22 July Accordance with international law of the unilateral declaration of independence in respect of Kosovo.

ANSWER TO THE REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION [NOTE: OR ANSWER TO THE REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION AND COUNTERCLAIMS, IF

International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination

Your questions about: the Court of Justice of the European Union. the EFTA Court. the European Court of Human Rights

STATUTE OF THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

STATUTE OF THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION

RULES FOR ARBITRATION BETWEEN THE BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS AND PRIVATE PARTIES

Second report of the Secretary-General submitted pursuant to Security Council resolution 1757 (2007) I. Introduction

Immunities and Criminal Proceedings (Equatorial Guinea v. France)

Case concerning Avena and other Mexican Nationals (Mexico v. United States of America) Summary of the Judgment of 31 March 2004

Certain Activities carried out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua)

219. IMMUNITIES AND CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS (EQUATORIAL GUINEA v. FRANCE) Order of 7 December 2016

F. Basic principles governing a headquarters agreement to be negotiated between the Court and the host country

Charter of the United Nations

Charter United. Nations. International Court of Justice. of the. and Statute of the

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE YEAR October 2018 ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF THE 1955 TREATY OF AMITY, ECONOMIC RELATIONS, AND CONSULAR RIGHTS

REQUEST FOR THE PRESCRIPTION OF PROVISIONAL MEASURES SUBMITTED BY SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES

Charter of the United Nations and Statute of the International Court of Justice

ORDER OF THE ACTING PRESIDENT OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS* MARCH 24, 2010.

COMMITTEE ON THE ELIMINATION OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA REQUEST FOR AN ADVISORY OPINION SUBMITTED BY THE SUB REGIONAL FISHERIES COMMISSION (SRFC)

STATUTE OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA

A WORLD COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS MANFRED NOWAK AND JULIA KOZMA

CHARTER OF THE UNITED NATIONS With introductory note and Amendments

Summary Not an official document. Summary 2017/1 2 February Maritime Delimitation in the Indian Ocean (Somalia v. Kenya)

CHARTER OF THE UNITED NATIONS. We the Peoples of the United Nations United for a Better World

Rules of Procedure of the ICPO-INTERPOL General Assembly

INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA

HAUT-COMMISSARIAT AUX DROITS DE L HOMME OFFICE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS PALAIS DES NATIONS 1211 GENEVA 10, SWITZERLAND

Application and requests for the indication of provisional measures

CODE OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT FOR THE JUDGES OF THE MECHANISM

RULES OF COURT (1978) ADOPTED ON 14 APRIL 1978 AND ENTERED INTO FORCE ON 1 JULY PREAMBLE *

VIENNA CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF TREATIES

IN THE HON BLE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE, HEGUE IN THE MATTER OF (AEGEAN SEA CONTINENTAL SHELF CASE) GREECE... APPELLANT TURKEY...

RULES OF PROCEDURE UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANISATION

CHARTER OF THE UNITED NATIONS

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE REPORTS OF JUDGMENTS, ADVISORY OPINIONS AND ORDERS JADHAV CASE. (INDIA v. PAKISTAN)

Protocol of the Court of Justice of the African

Cooperation agreements

RULES OF COURT (1978) ADOPTED ON 14 APRIL 1978 AND ENTERED INTO FORCE ON 1 JULY

CHARTER OF THE UNITED NATIONS

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE YEAR June LaGrand Case. (GERMANY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA) * *

RULES FOR EXPEDITED ARBITRATION. of the Finland Chamber of Commerce

Convention on the settlement of investment disputes between States and nationals of other States

NOTICE OF ARBITRATION

JURISDICTIONAL IMMUNITIES OF THE STATE

INDEX NO. UNASSIGNED NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/11/2018 SUMMONS

NEW ENGLAND SCHOOL OF LAW RWANDA GENOCIDE PROSECUTION PROJECT THE PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES OF THE RWANDA TRIBUNAL RELATING TO LIABILITY

BACKGROUND AND FRAMEWORK

ILO Convention No. 98 concerning Application of the Principles of the Right to Organise and to Bargain Collectively

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER II. Judge Ekaterina Trendafilova, Presiding Judge Judge Hans-Peter Kaul Judge Cuno Tarfusser SITUATION IN DARFUR, SUDAN

Report of the Bureau on non-cooperation

CERD/C/KOR/CO/ International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. United Nations

UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANISATION

European Telecommunications Satellite Organisation AMENDED CONVENTION EDITORIAL NOTE

Article (1) Article (2) Khalifa Bin Zayed Al Nahyan President of the United Arab Emirates NEW YORK CONVENTION Article I Article II

(b) LIGHTHOUSES IN CRETE AND SAMOS (see Report on the Work of the League, 1933/34, Part II, page 76, and 1936/37, Part II, page 74)

The International Court of Justice

CHARTER OF THE UNITED NATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS:

1965 CONVENTION ON THE SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES BETWEEN STATES AND NATIONALS OF OTHER STATES

PROTOCOL ON ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TO THE ANTARCTIC TREATY

TREATY SERIES 2008 Nº 7. Amendments to the Convention establishing the European Telecommunications Satellite Organisation (EUTELSAT)

THE PRESIDENT OF THE TRIBUNAL. Judge Carmel Agius, President IN THE CASE AGAINST PETAR JOJI] AND VJERICA RADETA PUBLIC

International Law of Freedom of Association in the Arab World

RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE FINANCE COMMITTEE. Introductory note

SPEECH BY H.E. JUDGE ROSALYN HIGGINS, PRESIDENT OF THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE, TO THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE UNITED NATIONS.

Summary 2010/1 20 April Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay) Summary of the Judgment of 20 April 2010

INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF ALL PERSONS FROM ENFORCED DISAPPEARANCE. Preamble

Draft Statute for an International Criminal Court 1994

Economic and Social Council

DIRECTIVE ON THE APPOINTMENT AND ASSIGNMENT OF DEFENCE COUNSEL

RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SEABED AUTHORITY. Introductory note

ERITREA ETHIOPIA CLAIMS COMMISSION RULES OF PROCEDURE CHAPTER ONE: RULES APPLICABLE TO ALL PROCEEDINGS

NOTICE OF ARBITRATION

A paper prepared for the Symposium on the International Criminal Court. February 3 4, 2007; Beijing, China

QATAR INTRODUCES NEW ARBITRATION LAW A SUMMARY

CONVENTION ON THE RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF DECISIONS RELATING TO MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONS

PROTOCOL ON THE STATUTE OF THE AFRICAN COURT OF JUSTICE AND HUMAN RIGHTS

Award Name and Date: Kompozit LLC v. Republic of Moldova (SCC Arbitration EA 2016/095) Emergency Award on Interim Measures 14 June 2016

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE APPLICATION INSTITUTING PROCEEDINGS

ARBITRATION RULES OF THE COMMON COURT OF JUSTICE AND ARBITRATION

QUESTIONS RELATING TO THE SEIZURE AND DETENTION OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS AND DATA

TABLE OF CONTENTS XIII

Rue Longue 127 BP Jodoigne Belgium

STICHTING OXFAM INTERNATIONAL CONSTITUTION

DRAFT RULES OF PROCEDURE CONTENTS

United Nations and the American Bar Association

1 FEBRUARY 2012 ADVISORY OPINION

REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION

Transcription:

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE Peace Palace, Carnegieplein 2, 2517 KJ The Hague, Netherlands Tel.: +31 (0)70 302 2323 Fax: +31 (0)70 364 9928 Website: www.icj-cij.org Twitter Account: @CIJ_ICJ YouTube Channel: CIJ ICJ Press Release Unofficial No. 2018/26 11 June 2018 The State of Qatar institutes proceedings against the United Arab Emirates and requests the Court to indicate provisional measures THE HAGUE, 11 June 2018. The State of Qatar (hereinafter Qatar ) today instituted proceedings against the United Arab Emirates (hereinafter the UAE ) at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the principal judicial organ of the United Nations, with regard to alleged violations of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination of 21 December 1965 (hereinafter the CERD ), to which both States are parties. The Applicant contends that [t]he UAE has enacted and implemented a series of discriminatory measures directed at Qataris based expressly on their national origin [that] remain in effect to this day, resulting in alleged human rights violations. According to Qatar, on and following 5 June 2017, the UAE expelled all Qataris within its borders; prohibited them from entering or passing through the UAE; closed UAE airspace and seaports to Qatar and Qataris; interfered with the rights of Qataris who own property in the UAE; limited the rights of Qataris to any speech deemed to be in support of or opposed to the actions against Qatar; and shut down the local offices of Al Jazeera Media Network, and blocked the transmission of Al Jazeera and other Qatari media outlets. Qatar claims that those measures interfere with a number of rights, including the right to marriage and choice of spouse, result in violations of the rights to freedom of opinion and expression, the right to education and the right to work, and impact the rights of Qataris to own property and enjoy equal treatment before tribunals. As basis for the Court s jurisdiction, the Applicant invokes Article 36, paragraph 1, of the Statute of the Court and Article 22 of the CERD. Qatar, therefore, in its own right and as parens patriae of its citizens, respectfully requests the Court to adjudge and declare that the UAE, through its State organs, State agents, and other persons and entities exercising governmental authority, and through other agents acting on its instructions or under its direction and control, has violated its obligations under Articles 2, 4, 5, 6, and 7 of the CERD by taking, inter alia, the following unlawful actions: (a) [e]xpelling, on a collective basis, all Qataris from, and prohibiting the entry of all Qataris into, the UAE on the basis of their national origin;

- 2 - (b) [v]iolating other fundamental rights, including the rights to marriage and choice of spouse, freedom of opinion and expression, public health and medical care, education and training, property, work, participation in cultural activities, and equal treatment before tribunals; (c) [f]ailing to condemn and instead encouraging racial hatred against Qatar and Qataris and failing to take measures that aim to combat prejudices, including by inter alia: criminalizing the expression of sympathy toward Qatar and Qataris; allowing, promoting, and financing an international anti-qatar public and social media campaign; silencing Qatari media; and calling for physical attacks on Qatari entities; and (d) [f]ailing to provide effective protection and remedies to Qataris to seek redress against acts of racial discrimination through UAE courts and institutions. Accordingly, Qatar respectfully requests the Court to order the UAE to take all steps necessary to comply with its obligations under CERD and, inter alia: (a) [i]mmediately cease and revoke the Discriminatory Measures, including but not limited to the directives against sympathizing with Qataris, and any other national laws that discriminate de jure or de facto against Qataris on the basis of their national origin; (b) [i]mmediately cease all other measures that incite discrimination (including media campaigns and supporting others to propagate discriminatory messages) and criminalize such measures; (c) [c]omply with its obligations under the CERD to condemn publicly racial discrimination against Qataris, pursue a policy of eliminating racial discrimination, and adopt measures to combat such prejudice; (d) [r]efrain from taking any further measures that would discriminate against Qataris within its jurisdiction or control; (e) [r]estore rights of Qataris to, inter alia, marriage and choice of spouse, freedom of opinion and expression, public health and medical care, education and training, property, work, participation in cultural activities, and equal treatment before tribunals, and put in place measures to ensure those rights are respected; (f) [p]rovide assurances and guarantees of non-repetition of the UAE s illegal conduct; and (g) [m]ake full reparation, including compensation, for the harm suffered as a result of the UAE s actions in violation of the CERD. On 11 June 2018, pursuant to Article 41 of the Statute and Articles 73, 74 and 75 of the Rules of Court, Qatar also filed a Request for the indication of provisional measures to protect against further, irreparable harm the rights of Qataris and their families under the CERD and to prevent aggravation or extension of the dispute, pending final judgment in the case. The Applicant claims that the very rights of Qatar that are at issue in these proceedings are threatened with imminent and irreparable injury by the UAE.

- 3 - Consequently, Qatar requests the Court as a matter of urgency to indicate the following provisional measures, which are clearly directly linked to the rights that form the subject matter of the dispute, pending its determination of this case on the merits: (a) [t]he UAE shall cease and desist from any and all conduct that could result, directly or indirectly, in any form of racial discrimination against Qatari individuals and entities by any organs, agents, persons, and entities exercising UAE governmental authority in its territory, or under its direction or control. In particular, the UAE shall immediately cease and desist from violations of the human rights of Qataris under the CERD, including by: (i) suspending operation of the collective expulsion of all Qataris from, and ban on entry into, the UAE on the basis of national origin; (ii) taking all necessary steps to ensure that Qataris (or persons with links to Qatar) are not subjected to racial hatred or discrimination, including by condemning hate speech targeting Qataris, ceasing publication of anti-qatar statements and caricatures, and refraining from any other incitement to racial discrimination against Qataris; (iii) suspending the application of its Federal Decree-Law no. (5) of 2012, On Combatting Cybercrimes, to any person who shows sympathy... towards Qatar and any other domestic laws that (de jure or de facto) discriminate against Qataris; (iv) taking the measures necessary to protect freedom of expression of Qataris in the UAE, including by suspending the UAE s closure and blocking of transmissions by Qatari media outlets; (v) ceasing and desisting from measures that, directly or indirectly, result in the separation of families that include a Qatari, and taking all necessary steps to ensure that families separated by the Discriminatory Measures are reunited (in the UAE, if that is the family s preference); (vi) ceasing and desisting from measures that, directly or indirectly, result in Qataris being unable to seek medical care in the UAE on the grounds of their national origin and taking all necessary steps to ensure that such care is provided; (vii) ceasing and desisting from measures that, directly or indirectly, prevent Qatari students from receiving education or training from UAE institutions, and taking all necessary steps to ensure that students have access to their educational records; (viii) ceasing and desisting from measures that, directly or indirectly, prevent Qataris from accessing, enjoying, utilizing, or managing their property in the UAE, and taking all necessary steps to ensure that Qataris may authorize valid powers of attorney in the UAE, renew necessary business and worker licenses, and renew their leases; and (ix) taking all necessary steps to ensure that Qataris are granted equal treatment before tribunals and other judicial organs in the UAE, including a mechanism to challenge any discriminatory measures;

- 4 - (b) [t]he UAE shall abstain from any measure that might aggravate, extend, or make more difficult resolution of this dispute; and (c) [t]he UAE shall abstain from any other measure that might prejudice the rights of Qatar in the dispute before the Court. Note: The Court s press releases are prepared by its Registry for information purposes only and do not constitute official documents. The full text of Qatar s Application of 11 June 2018 will be available shortly on the Court s website. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations. It was established by the United Nations Charter in June 1945 and began its activities in April 1946. The seat of the Court is at the Peace Palace in The Hague (Netherlands). Of the six principal organs of the United Nations, it is the only one not located in New York. The Court has a twofold role: first, to settle, in accordance with international law, legal disputes submitted to it by States (its judgments have binding force and are without appeal for the parties concerned); and, second, to give advisory opinions on legal questions referred to it by duly authorized United Nations organs and agencies of the system. The Court is composed of 15 judges elected for a nine-year term by the General Assembly and the Security Council of the United Nations. Independent of the United Nations Secretariat, it is assisted by a Registry, its own international secretariat, whose activities are both judicial and diplomatic, as well as administrative. The official languages of the Court are French and English. Also known as the World Court, it is the only court of a universal character with general jurisdiction. The ICJ, a court open only to States for contentious proceedings, and to certain organs and institutions of the United Nations system for advisory proceedings, should not be confused with the other mostly criminal judicial institutions based in The Hague and adjacent areas, such as the International Criminal Court (ICC, the only permanent international criminal court, which was established by treaty and does not belong to the United Nations system), the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL, an international judicial body with an independent legal personality, established by the United Nations Security Council upon the request of the Lebanese Government and composed of Lebanese and international judges), the Mechanism for International Criminal Tribunals (MICT, mandated to take over residual functions from the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia and from the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda), the Kosovo Specialist Chambers and Specialist Prosecutor s Office (an ad hoc judicial institution which has its seat in The Hague), or the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA, an independent institution which assists in the establishment of arbitral tribunals and facilitates their work, in accordance with the Hague Convention of 1899).

- 5 - Information Department: Mr. Andrey Poskakukhin, First Secretary of the Court, Head of Department (+31 (0)70 302 2336) Ms Joanne Moore, Information Officer (+31 (0)70 302 2337) Mr. Avo Sevag Garabet, Associate Information Officer (+31 (0)70 302 2394) Ms Genoveva Madurga, Administrative Assistant (+31 (0)70 302 2396)