HOSPIRA HEALTHCARE CORPORATION. and THE KENNEDY INSTITUTE OF RHEUMATOLOGY

Similar documents
IN THE MATTER OF SECTIONS 5 AND 6 OF THE COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION ACT, R.S.C. 1985, C. 17 (2 nd SUPP.)

Navigating through the Obviousness-Type Double Patenting Minefield Landslide Vol. 10, No. 3 January/February 2018

appropriate measure of damages to which plaintiff Janssen Biotech,

These rules shall be known as the Local Rules for Columbia and Montour Counties, the 26 th Judicial District, and shall be cited as L.R. No.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A. D. 2014

LITIGATION CHRONOLOGY ( )

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MONROE COUNTY FORTY-THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

Rule 22 - General Provisions for Motions

CHAPTER ARBITRATION

NOAHS ARK FOUNDATION AND ITIG TRUST AND NATHAN JOEL PEACHEY SECRETARY. and

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE

Docket Number: 2643 PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL CENTER OF WASHINGTON, PENNSYLVANIA, INC.

Rule Change #2001(16) The Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure Chapter 26. Colorado Rules of Procedure for Small Claims Courts Appendix to Chapter 26

Case 1:15-cv MLW Document 44 Filed 04/15/15 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

The Small Claims Regulations, 2017

The Small Claims Regulations, 1998

LOCAL RULES of the COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CLARION COUNTY

Judge Mary L. Mikva CALENDAR 6 - ROOM 2508 Telephone: 312/ Fax: 312/

Canadian Triton International, Ltd. (Assignees of) v. National Iranian Oil Co.

Docket Number: 3916 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATIION, SHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY

*(CONSOLIDATED INTO DOCKET NO. 3464) Docket Number: 3643 PRO-SPEC PAINTING, INC. Robert D. Ardizzi, Esquire David S. Makara, Esquire VS.

PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE. ) ) Plaintiff ) ) ) Defendants ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) REASONS FOR DECISION

Case 1:17-cv MLW Document 222 Filed 04/03/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Procedural Rules Mining and Lands Commissioner

STANDING ORDER FOR CALENDAR Y * Room 2101

LegalFormsForTexas.Com

SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA. vs. Case No: ORDER ESTABLISHING MOTION PRACTICE PROCEDURE

RULES OF PRACTICE OF THE FRANKLIN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS GENERAL DIVISION

VENNGO INC. and CONCIERGE CONNECTION INC. C.O.B. AS PERKOPOLIS, MORGAN C. MARLOWE AND RICHARD THOMAS JOYNT JUDGMENT

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

CLASS ACTION NOTICE TO GROUP MEMBERS BANKSIA SECURITIES LIMITED DEBENTURE HOLDERS

Adopted November 10, 2000, by Chief District Court Judge John W. Smith. See Separate Section on Rules governing Criminal and Juvenile Courts Rule

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE

COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF MANITOBA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. versus Civil Action 4:17 cv 02946

Australian International Insurance Ltd. Tomo Perkovic Melbourne Senior Member D. Cremean Hearing

RULES OF THE SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION OF THE DISTRICT COURTS

THE COURTS. Title 207 JUDICIAL CONDUCT

CALENDAR Q. JUDGE PATRICK J. SHERLOCK 2007 RICHARD J. DALEY CENTER CHICAGO, ILLINOIS fax

Introductory Guide to Civil Litigation in Ontario

Docket Number: 1441 M & K ELECTRICAL COMPANY, INC. Keith A. Bassi, Esquire CLOSED VS. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

SUMMARY OF CONTENTS SC-1.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv ER Document 72 Filed 12/27/18 Page 1 of 12

RULE 53 EVIDENCE AT TRIAL

Page 2 [2] The action arose from a motor vehicle accident on October 9, The plaintiff Anthony Okafor claimed two million dollars and the plainti

PAMS ARBITRATION RULES

Rhode Island False Claims Act

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST

Schedule A Review Board Rules of Procedure

State Reporting Bureau

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs. Defendants ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

Docket Number: BARR STREET CORPORATION, d/b/a HORIZON SENIOR CARE. Katherine Stine, Esquire Daniel K. Natirboff, Esquire CLOSED VS.

Arbitration Rules. Administered. Effective July 1, 2013 CPR PROCEDURES & CLAUSES. International Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution

SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: Doucette v. Nova Scotia, 2016 NSSC 78

*(CONSOLIDATED INTO 3951)* Docket Number: TO1 CONTACT CENTERS, INC. Jeffrey J. Reich, Esquire James W Kutz, Esquire VS.

MONTANA UNIFORM DISTRICT COURT RULES

LOCAL RULES. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MERCER COUNTY, 35 th JUDICIAL DISTRICT. Rules of Civil Procedure. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Rules for Qualified & Court-Appointed Parenting Coordinators

THE CHANCERY BAR ASSOCIATION S CONDITIONAL FEE CONDITIONS The following expressions used in these Conditions have the following

IN THE MATTER OF THE INSURANCE ACT, R.S.O. 1990, c. I. 8, SECTION 268 and REGULATION 283/95

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D

AMENDMENTS TO THE ONTARIO RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

PREVIEW PLEASE DO NOT COPY THIS DOCUMENT THANK YOU

May 29, 2012 PL Ontario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario

EXAMINATION OUT OF COURT RULE 34 PROCEDURE ON ORAL EXAMINATIONS

The Consumer Code for Home Builders Independent Dispute Resolution Scheme. Information for customers

INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING AND PURSUING A CIVIL COMPLAINT IN THE MAGISTRATE COURT OF LOWNDES COUNTY

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF THE FIFTY-NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA (Composed of Elk and Cameron Counties)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS [MARSHALL / TYLER / TEXARKANA] DIVISION

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) A.D RENEE FRANCIS MARIE FRANCIS. and KENNETH JAMES LUCIA JAMES. 1994: November 30; December 7.

IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION., ) Plaintiff, ) ) CONSENT STIPULATIONS FOR v. ) ARBITRATION PROCEDURES ), ) Defendant.

Form 5-6. (Subrule 5-6(1)) COURT FILE NUMBER JUDICIAL CENTRE PLAINTIFF(S) DEFENDANT(S) AFFIDAVIT OF DOCUMENTS. Affidavit of Documents of

CHAPTER 16 EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES - UNLAWFUL DISCRIMINATION

PURDUE PHARMA AND EURO-CELTIQUE S.A. and PURDUE PHARMA. and COLLEGIUM PHARMACEUTICAL, INC. MAPI LIFE SCIENCES CANADA INC. AND THE MINISTER OF HEALTH

RULE 1:13. Miscellaneous Rules As To Procedure

Ortega v Rockefeller Ctr. N. Inc NY Slip Op 33667(U) October 1, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /10 Judge: Donna M.

HA-N EY ) k -;,' 1, Court File No ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) THE HONOURABLE MR- TUESDAY, THE 29TH DAY

State Reporting Bureau

CHAPTER 200. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION; GENERAL PROVISIONS

Toronto Local Appeal Body Public Guide

New Jersey False Claims Act

BY-LAWS OF THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF SOUTH PLAINFIELD. Table of Contents

Rules of the Legal Fee Arbitration Board of the Massachusetts Bar Association As Amended and Effective September 1, 2012

District of Columbia Court of Appeals Board on Professional Responsibility. Board Rules

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. TOYO TIRE U.S.A. CORP., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No: 14 C 206 )

RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST. IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE DONALDSON-HONEYWELL

Case 4:02-cv Document 538 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 1 of 2

COMMERCIAL CALENDAR I (Effective January 30, 2012)

RULE 24. Compulsory arbitration

Administrative Rules for the Office of Professional Regulation Effective date: February 1, Table of Contents

CALENDAR Q. JUDGE BILL TAYLOR 2007 RICHARD J. DALEY CENTER CHICAGO, ILLINOIS fax

Filing an Answer to the Complaint or Moving to Dismiss under Rule 12

Docket Number: 2030-P INDIAN CREEK NURSING HOME. John N. Kennedy, Esquire Louis J. Capozzi, Jr., Esquire Randy J. Riley, Esquire CLOSED VS.

Transcription:

Date: 20150417 Docket: T-396-13 Toronto, Ontario, April 17, 2015 PRESENT: Madam Prothonotary Martha Milczynski BETWEEN: HOSPIRA HEALTHCARE CORPORATION Plaintiff and THE KENNEDY INSTITUTE OF RHEUMATOLOGY Defendant AND BETWEEN: THE KENNEDY TRUST FOR RHEUMATOLOGY RESEARCH, JANSSEN BIOTECH, INC., JANSSEN INC. AND CILAG GMBH INTERNATIONAL Plaintiffs by Counterclaim and HOSPIRA HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, CELLTRION HEALTHCARE CO. LTD AND CELLTRION INC. Defendants by Counterclaim

Page: 2 ORDER UPON MOTION dated the 30th day of January, 2015 (Motion #1) on behalf of the Plaintiff and Defendants to the Counterclaim, Hospira Healthcare Corporation, Celltrion Healthcare Co. Ltd. and Celltrion Inc. ( Hospira and Celltrion ), for: 1. An Order compelling [Janssen Biotech, Inc., Janssen Inc. and Cilag GmbH International (collectively, Janssen )] to produce a representative for the continuation of the first round of examinations for discovery for at least two days, in Toronto, at Janssen s expense within 30 days of the issuance of this Order; 2. An Order compelling Janssen to serve a sworn affidavit of documents within 10 days of the issuance of this Order; 3. Costs of this motion payable to the Moving Parties; and 4. Such further and other relief as counsel may advise and this Honourable Court deems just. AND UPON MOTION dated the 31st day of July, 2014 (Motion #2) on behalf of Hospira and Celltrion for, inter alia, the following: 1. An Order compelling the representative of The Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology ( Kennedy Institute ) and The Kennedy Trust for Rheumatology Research ( Kennedy Trust ) (collectively Kennedy ) to re-attend in Toronto, at their own expense, to complete the examination by no later than November 15, 2014.

Page: 3 2. An Order compelling Dr. Feldmann and Dr. Maini to re-attend in Toronto, at their own expense, to complete their examination no later than November 30, 2014. 3. An Order that Kennedy shall reimburse Hospira/Celltrion s travel expenses incurred in completing the examinations of the Kennedy representative, Dr. Feldmann or Dr. Maini are not made available for the completion of their examinations in Toronto forthwith. 4. An Order that Dr. Maini be appointed as the representative for Kennedy on examination for discovery pursuant to Rule 237(3) and that Dr. Maini s testimony from his examination held on May 29, 2014 shall be considered as an examination of Kennedy pursuant to Rule 234 of the Federal Courts Rules. 5. Costs of this motion to Hospira and Celltrion on a solicitor-client basis. 6. Such further and other relief as this Honourable Court may deem just. AND UPON reviewing the motion records filed on behalf of the parties and hearing the submissions of counsel; AND UPON Hospira and Celltrion withdrawing, with prejudice, their requests that: 1. Dr. Maini be appointed as the representative for Kennedy on examination for discovery and that Dr. Maini s testimony from his examination held on May 29, 2014 shall be considered as an examination of Kennedy;

Page: 4 2. Kennedy re-attend in Toronto at their own expense and that Kennedy reimburse Hospira/Celltrion s travel expenses incurred in completing the examinations of the Kennedy representative; and 3. Janssen re-attend in Toronto at their own expense. AND UPON the Court taking under reserve its disposition of item #2 in Motion #2 and any issues as to costs thereof, and upon subsequently further considering the submissions of counsel for the Plaintiffs that the examination of each of Dr. Feldmann and Dr. Maini, although conducted for two days, was not completed and that they had requested two days (each) from the outset. The Plaintiffs described generally the topics for discovery yet to be completed with the investors and requested a further one day with each of the inventors. I am satisfied, however, that a half day with each would be sufficient and that these discoveries should be concluded with some cooperation between the parties so as to permit the litigation to progress. I am also satisfied that, unless the parties agree otherwise, that the examinations of Dr. Feldmann and Dr. Maini should proceed by way of teleconference. THIS COURT ORDERS that: 1. The representative of Kennedy shall attend for the continuation and completion of examinations for discovery for 2 days. 2. The representative of Janssen shall attend for the continuation and completion of examination for discovery for 2.5 days.

Page: 5 3. A day as referred to in this order shall be from 9:30 to 5:00 with one hour of breaks (or such other time as the parties may agree) and a half day shall consist of three hours and fifteen minutes. 4. Kennedy and Janssen shall not object to or refuse to answer any questions solely on the basis that the question should have or could have previously been asked. 5. Hospira and Celltrion shall seek leave of the Court prior to conducting any further examinations for discovery of Kennedy or Janssen. 6. Hospira and Celltrion shall complete the examination of each of Dr. Feldmann and Dr. Maini in one-half day (each), which examinations shall be conducted by teleconference, unless otherwise agreed to by the parties. 7. There shall be no costs on any part of these motions. Martha Milczynski Prothonotary