LAW OF EVIDENCE A: 2017

Similar documents
LAW OF EVIDENCE B: 2017

LAW OF EVIDENCE B: 2016

COURSE: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE A: 2016

Together with Course A, this course should cover all the main aspects of criminal procedure encountered in practice.

MULTI CHOICE QUESTIONS EVI301-A

NATIONAL BAR EXAMINATION. Criminal Procedure and the Law of Evidence Relating to Criminal Cases Curriculum

Submitted by Nduduzo A. Ndlovu. Student Number: Supervisor: Benita Whitcher

S v Ndiki & others [2006] JOL (Ck)

An Analysis of the Regulatory Environment Governing Hearsay Electronic Evidence in South Africa: Suggestions for Reform Part One

Presentation to: Central and Latin American InterPARES Dissemination Team

Rules for Bankruptcy Cases, B.E (1999) Translation

RECORDING OF EVIDENCE.

JUDGMENT (For delivery)

CROSS AND TAPPER ON EVIDENCE

City University of Hong Kong. Information on a Course offered by School of Law with effect from Semester B in 2012/13

Where did the law of evidence come from/why have the law of evidence? Check on the power of executive government (Guantanamo Bay).

NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL Citation: MacNutt v. Acadia University, 2017 NSCA 57. Laura MacNutt/PIER 101 Home Designs Inc.

Constitutional Law A 2016

BELIZE ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE ACT CHAPTER 95:01 REVISED EDITION 2003 SHOWING THE SUBSTANTIVE LAWS AS AT 31ST MAY, 2003

SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE

Evidence Study & Review Session One Learning from Multiple Choice

Southwestern Community College District Procedure Human Resources

OF TAKING AND DEFENDING DEPOSITIONS

THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN

THE ATTORNEYS' ADMISSION EXAMINATION (2017 Issue)

NOT REPORTABLE IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD AT JOHANNESBURG CASE NO. JR 365/06

Hong Kong Evidence Law Notes

TITLE XIV TRIALS (6/30/03) 84. The amendment is effective as of June 30, 2003.

TRIAL DOCUMENTS PROVING, TENDERING AND CROSS-EXAMINATION

Eyewitness identification is evidence received from a witness who has actually seen an event and can so testify in court.

Case Preparation and Presentation: A Guide for Arbitration Advocates and Arbitrators

The content/substance of protection for TK and TCEs: other resources. Wend Wendland. Director (a/g) and Head, Traditional Knowledge Division, WIPO

JOHANNES WILLEM DU TOIT ACCUSED NO 1 GIDEON JOHANNES THIART ACCUSED NO 2 MERCIA VAN DEVENTER ACCUSED NO 3

Law of Evidence. Teaching Material. Kahsay Debesu, (LL.B, Lecture) & Andualem Eshetu( LL.B, Assistant Lecturer)

BAR OF GUAM ETHICS COMMITTEE RULES OF PROCEDURE - DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

Evidence 213B Professor Schroeder (Fall 2015) Reading List / Course Assignments (Rev. 08/08/2015) Page 1

Electronic copy available at:

Contents. Dedication... v. About the Author... xvii. Acknowledgments... xix. Foreword... xxi. Preface... xxv A Note about Primary Sources...

J. Max Wawrik Nancy Rosado Colon Law 16 Spring 2017

LEGAL STUDIES. Victorian Certificate of Education STUDY DESIGN. Accreditation Period.

P L A N N I N G B O A R D B Y L A W S

RSPH Level 5 Diploma in Adjudication in the Construction Industry

The Law Commission. The consultation. Dr Chris Pamplin 5/5/2009. The Expert Witness 1

WHAT IS HEARSAY AND WHY DO WE CARE?

RESTITUTION BY EXPROPRIATION OF LAND RIGHTS WHAT ABOUT MARKET VALUE?

THE PHI KAPPA TAU FRATERNITY CLAIM AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION PLAN AND RULES

Evidence Lessons. Center for Computer-Assisted Legal Instruction

EVIDENCE BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

Trials in Supreme Court

Guidelines on Evidence

TRIAL CHAMBER I. SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. THOMAS LUBANGA DYILO. Public

(2) When it is said that the court makes a finding, this actually means that the judicial

UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI MODULE II PROGRAMME-2011/2012 (DAY AND EVENING) (NAIROBI)

Dr. Nael Bunni, Chairman, Dispute Resolution Panel, Engineers Ireland, 22 Clyde Road, Ballsbridge, Dublin 4. December 2000.

TRIAL CHAIVIBER I. SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v.thomas LUBANGA DYILO. Public

CITY OF DEERFIELD BEACH Request for City Commission Agenda

SUGGESTIONS, TIPS AND HINTS FOR DRAFTING AFFIDAVITS

CRIMINAL LAW. Course Goals: My goals for this course are for you to:

Rule 8400 Rules of Practice and Procedure GENERAL Introduction Definitions General Principles

Chapter 4 Types of Evidence

COURSE: Legal Education GRADE(S): Ten (10) Eleven (11) and Twelve (12) NATIONAL STANDARDS: Civics, Government, Citizenship and Communication

All about Documentary Evidence. under. Indian Evidence, By: Namita Sirsiya

Evidentiary Standards in the State of Illinois: The Interpretation and Implementation of Supreme Court Opinions

TRIAL ADVOCACY - FALL 2005

THE EVIDENCE (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2006

DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND FACT FINDING METHODS (pt. 1) NONSO ROBERT ATTOH FACULTY OF LAW UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA DEC 2016

Rules of Evidence (Abridged)

CHAPTER TWO THE SOUTH AFRICAN LEGAL SYSTEM

Act 2 Code of Evidence Act 2006

EVIDENCE LAW SUMMARY

MERITS AND JUSTICE OF THE CASE

Courses PROGRAM AT THE SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND DIPLOMACY. Course List. The Government and Politics in China

EVIDENCE ACT LAWS OF GRENADA REVISED EDITION CHAPTER 92. Amended by Act No. 7 of 1968 Act No. 12 of 1990 Act No. 9 of 1995 Act No.

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG

Oklahoma High School Mock Trial Program RULES OF EVIDENCE ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS. Rule 101. Scope

PIK-IT UP JOHANNESBURG (PTY) LTD. Third Respondent JUDGMENT. [1] This is an application in terms of which the applicant seeks to have the

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (Northern Cape Division, Kimberley)

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN)

Jury Directions Act 2015

OBJECTION YOUR HONOUR!

Post-Grant for Practitioners. Evidentiary Trends at the PTAB (Part 1) May 11, Thomas Rozylowicz Principal. Steve Schaefer Principal

IN THE KWAZULU-NATAL HIGH COURT, DURBAN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA. DAVID MBALEKI First Appellant. AFRICA MGQAMBI Second Appellant. THE STATE Respondent

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 2018

IS SECTION 2(3) OF THE WILLS ACT 7 OF 1953 FINALLY TAILORED? (CONTINUED)

ARBITRATION RULES. Arbitration Rules Archive. 1. Agreement of Parties

IN A GENERAL COURT-MARTIAL SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, U.S. ARMY TRIAL JUDICIARY FORT BRAGG, NORTH CAROLINA

INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS IN WTO DISPUTE SETTLEMENT

Santa Monica College

Two heads are better than one Assessors in High Court civil cases. By Henry Lerm

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (ORANGE FREE STATE PROVINCIAL DIVISION) The Standard Bank Fund Managers Ltd. Lesotho National Life Assurance Co Ltd

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA

Office Hours: Please see availability and book an appointment online:

Criminal Justice 100

PLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts.

SIMULATED MBE ANALYSIS: EVIDENCE PROFESSOR ROBERT PUSHAW PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW

ZONING HEARING BOARD TESTIMONY TIPS, TRICKS AND WAR STORIES

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT

COURSE OUTLINE AND ASSIGNMENTS

Transcription:

LAW OF EVIDENCE A: 2017 OVERVIEW: PURPOSE OF THE COURSE: For the student to acquire a basic knowledge of general principles relating to the law of evidence. With the knowledge acquired in this course the student should be equipped to deal with the more specialised principles covered in Law of Evidence A and apply such principles in a practical working legal environment. HOW THIS FITS INTO THE OVERALL DEGREE STRUCTURE As a procedural (adjectival) law subject, this course equips the student to apply the substantive law and law of evidence in courts and tribunals in South Africa. CREDIT VALUE: 10 This works out as follows: 18 hours 25 lectures @ 45 mins each 0.75 hours 1 written test 2 hours 1 written examination 79.25 hours Individual learning (pre- and post-lecture reading, preparation of written assignment, test and examination preparation) Total: 100 hours work ASSUMPTIONS OF PRIOR LEARNING General exposure to the idea of legal principles (legal theory, constitutional law, interpretation of statutes, criminal procedure, civil procedure), as well as the whole spectrum of private law, such as contract, property, delict. Ability to read and interpret statute law, read and interpret decided cases in law reports, apply the doctrine of precedent. Ability to analyse a set of facts; identify the legal problem contained therein, apply the appropriate law to derive a solution. S CROSS-FIELD S (CCFOs) This course should contribute to the following critical outcomes: a) identify and solve problems b) collect, analyse and evaluate information c) communicate effectively d) recognise problem solving contexts e) solve legal problems in a practical scenario f) reflect on and explore effective learning strategies g) critique existing legal rules Law of Evidence A 2017 Page 1 of 11

SPECIFIC INTENDED S 1. Describe what law of evidence is; describe sources of SA law of evidence; describe the two main systems of gathering evidence: adversarial and inquisitorial, listing advantages and disadvantages of each; describe role of English law in SA law of evidence 2. Describe key concepts: relevance, admissibility, weight; describe basic terminology used in law of evidence LINKED ASSESSMENT CRITERIA a, b, c, : What law of evidence is and purpose thereof Two main evidencegathering systems, with advantages/disadvantages of each Role of English law of evidence in our system a, b, c, : Key concepts: relevance, admissibility, weight Basic terminology Class discussions: examining examples (formative) Written test (summative): paragraph style description Final examination (summative): paragraph style description Law of Evidence A 2017 Page 2 of 11

3. Describe concepts of burden and standard of proof required in a court of law; describe presumptions assisting a party to prove a case 4. Describe concepts of competence to testify and compellability to testify; identify from a factual scenario whether a witness is competent to testify and whether a particular witness can be compelled to testify LINKED a, b, c, ASSESSMENT CRITERIA Burden of proof and standard of proof for criminal and civil cases Presumptions and their effect in proving a case Concept of competence to testify and compellability to testify Identifies whether in practical scenario a witness is competent and/or compellable to testify and applies correct rules Class discussions: examining examples (formative) Written test (summative): paragraph style description or factual problem requiring solution Final examination (summative): paragraph style description or factual problem requiring solution Law of Evidence A 2017 Page 3 of 11

5. Describe the course of evidence in a typical criminal and civil trial and the basic concepts such as sequence of parties cases; evidence in chief, cross-examination, re-examination, proof of prior consistent statements, evidence taken on commission. a, b, c, Course of evidence in a typical trial (criminal and civil) Sequence of evidence Way evidence is presented: examination in chief, crossexamination, reexamination; Proof of prior consistent statements Evidence taken on commission Class discussions: examining examples (formative) Written test (summative): paragraph style description Final examination (summative): paragraph style description Law of Evidence A 2017 Page 4 of 11

6. Describe the concept of judicial notice and principles applicable thereto; list some common examples in practice of matters of which judicial notice can be taken; identify in a given factual scenario whether judicial notice of a particular fact or facts can be taken, and what the effect thereof will be. 7. Describe opinion evidence and the principles relating thereto; the traditional rule distinguishing between the opinion of experts and lay people; critique the validity of this distinction; describe the rules relating to the presentation of expert opinion evidence LINKED ASSESSMENT CRITERIA Concept of judicial notice Rules applicable to judicial notice Some typical examples of matters of which judicial notice can be taken Effect of judicial notice Identifies opportunity for judicial notice in factual scenario and applies correct rules Opinion evidence Principles relating to Rules relating to presentation of opinion evidence Critically analyses the appropriateness of some earlier cases which apply different criteria to opinions of experts and lay persons Class discussions: examining examples (formative) Written test (summative): paragraph style description or factual problem requiring solution Final examination (summative): paragraph style description or factual problem requiring solution Law of Evidence A 2017 Page 5 of 11

8. Describe character evidence and the principles relating thereto; identify character evidence in a given factual scenario, and decide with reasons whether such evidence would be admissible 9. Describe real evidence (tangible objects used as evidence, eg murder weapon); describe the rules applicable to the presentation of such evidence; identify real evidence in a given factual scenario, and decide with reasons whether such evidence would be admissible LINKED ASSESSMENT CRITERIA Meaning of character evidence Principles relating to admission of such evidence Identifies whether in practical scenario character evidence would be permissible, and if admissible applies correct rules Real evidence Rules relating to admission thereof Identifies real evidence in a practical scenario and applies correct rules thereto Law of Evidence A 2017 Page 6 of 11

10. Describe documentary evidence (documents used as evidence of their contents, eg cheque, contract, letter); describe the rules applicable to the presentation of such evidence; identify documentary evidence in a given factual scenario, and decide with reasons whether such evidence would be admissible 11. Describe evidence generated by machines such as computers; describe the history of rules applicable to the presentation of such evidence; describe the rules currently applicable to the presentation of such evidence; identify machine-generated evidence in a given factual scenario, and decide with reasons whether such evidence would be admissible LINKED ASSESSMENT CRITERIA Documentary evidence Rules relating to admission thereof Identifies documentary evidence in factual scenario and applies correct rules thereto Machine-generated evidence History of approach to such evidence Rules currently applicable (s 15 of Act 25 of 2002) Identifies machinegenerated evidence in a factua scenario and applies correct rules thereto Law of Evidence A 2017 Page 7 of 11

LINKED ASSESSMENT CRITERIA 12. Describe the principles applicable to the weighing up of evidence at the end of a trial; critique some approaches favoured by courts; in a given factual scenario identify the applicable rule(s) to be applied, and apply same to the facts process of weighing up evidence at end of trial Critically analyses some tradtional approaches Identifies and applies correct rules from factual scenario Law of Evidence A 2017 Page 8 of 11

TEACHING METHODS Lectures (mainly with the aid of PowerPoint slides) Skeleton slides for teaching purpose only Reading list at each lecture Class discussion and group discussion Assignment Test and examination RESOURCES AND OWN NOTE MAKING NB: Lecture slides WILL NOT BE MADE AVAILABLE to students. Students are expected to TAKE NOTES IN CLASS and use the textbooks below and cases cited to make their own notes. TEXT BOOKS: Zeffert and Paizes: Essential Evidence (Latest edition) ISBN: 9780409048391 Schwikkard & Van der Merwe: Principles of Evidence (3 rd edition 2009) Adrian Bellenge re, Robin Palmer et al: The Law of Evidence in South Africa, Basic Principles. Oxford (1 st edition 2013) See also South African Law of Evidence (2 nd ed) by Zeffertt, Paizes and Skeen (2009) Commentary on the Criminal Procedure Act, by Du Toit and others (looseleaf) ASSESSMENT CRITERIA (For written assignments, and, with due allowance for time and other constraints, for tests and examinations) Presentation: 10% Structure: 10% Content: 20% Understanding: 30% Insight: 30% Law of Evidence A 2017 Page 9 of 11

COURSE CONTENT / OUTLINE Topic 1 Introduction and overview Week 1 Law of Evidence sources, history and scope Impact of the Constitution on the law of evidence Topic 2 The Presentation of evidence Week 1 Basic concepts and terminology Admissibility and weight Evidence and proof Duty to begin Burden and standard of proof Topic 3 Witnesses Week 2 Competence and compellability General rules Special categories Topic 4 Stages in trial process, and the presentation of oral evidence Week 2 Adducing evidence From evidence-in- chief to re-examination Hostile Witnesses Prior statements Refreshing memory Evidence on commission Topic 5 Types of Evidence Real evidence Week 3 Topic 6 Documentary evidence Week 3 Topic 7 Evidence of uncertain classification Week 4 and 5 Sui generis evidence Electronic / machine generated evidence Topic 8 Judicial notice Week 5 Topic 9 Presumptions Week 6 Presumptions of law and fact Statutory presumptions Topic 10 Assessment of evidence in court - Week 7 Opinion evidence Topic 11 The assessment of Evidence in court Week 8 Character evidence Law of Evidence A 2017 Page 10 of 11

Topic 12 The onus of proof in criminal matters Week 9 The onus of proof in civil cases Topic 13 The evaluation of evidence Week 10 Basic principles Credibility Circumstantial evidence Topic 14 The further assessment of evidence Week 10 Topic 15 Corroboration Week 11/12 Topic 16 Cautionary rule Week 13 Testimony of children Single witnesses Law of Evidence A 2017 Page 11 of 11