Case 2:15-cr SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 61 Page ID #:2023

Similar documents
SAMPLE FORM F NOTICE DESIGNATING RECORD ON APPEAL

DISTRICT COURT, FAMILY DIVISION CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA

TO THE HONORABLE TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, CHIEF JUSTICE, AND TO THE HONORABLE ASSOCIATE JUSTICES OF THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO DIVISION } } } } } } } } } } } } } } /

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER ANSWERING A BREACH OF CONTRACT COMPLAINT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

TO BE FILED IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI. SAMUEL M. BROTHERS and LORA BROTHERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE DIVISION

Case 2:10-cr CM Document 25 Filed 05/04/10 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case Doc 17 Filed 05/17/16 Entered 05/17/16 11:26:57 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS

Case 3:07-cr EDL Document 49 Filed 03/25/2008 Page 1 of 8

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS

Case pwb Doc 281 Filed 10/28/16 Entered 10/28/16 13:58:15 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 12

Official Form 410 Proof of Claim

Fresno County Superior Court, Case No. 1OCECGO2 116 The Honorable Jeffrey Y. Hamilton, Judge

Case Document 1213 Filed in TXSB on 01/15/13 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

Case 2:18-cv R-AGR Document 7 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:26

Case Doc 5 Filed 03/11/19 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

PlainSite. Legal Document. Missouri Eastern District Court Case No. 4:09-cv Jo Ann Howard and Associates, P.C. et al v.

Case 2:14-cv GW-AS Document 6 Filed 07/07/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:389

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF FRESNO 21 TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. Plaintiffs and Appellants, Defendants and Res ondents.

Case KJC Doc 108 Filed 06/29/16 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Chapter 11

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/28/ :04 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 19 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/28/2016

Case KJC Doc 2 Filed 03/12/18 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

No [DC# CV MJJ] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. RUSSELL ALLEN NORDYKE; et al., Plaintiffs - Appellants,

Case 2:17-ap BB Doc 50 Filed 05/04/17 Entered 05/04/17 14:14:01 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 6

TO ALL CREDITORS AND OTHER PARTIES IN INTEREST: Pastorick, Esquire duly affirmed January 21, 2010, together with the Exhibits annexed hereto and

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

Case 2:17-ap BB Doc 24 Filed 03/21/17 Entered 03/21/17 10:59:09 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 6

1 The parties to this action, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to. 2 the following:

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES UNLIMITED JURISDICTION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Part Description 1 5 pages 2 Proposed Order Proposed Order to Motion for Summary Judgment

Please reply to: Joyia Z. Greenfield Zachariah R. Tomlin May 6, 2016

rbk Doc#20 Filed 08/18/17 Entered 08/18/17 11:12:19 Main Document Pg 1 of 13

F ADV.NOTICE.LODGMENT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

Case 1:16-bk NWW Doc 336 Filed 03/24/16 Entered 03/24/16 12:28:00 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 6

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

copy 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff CALMAT CO. dba VTJLCAN MATERIALS COMPANY, WESTERN DIVISION 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Case VFP Doc 543 Filed 03/10/16 Entered 03/10/16 18:15:46 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 13

in furtherance of and in response to its Tentative Decision dated 1/4/2010 addressing various matters

GUARANTEED DEPOSIT ACCOUNT CONTRACT

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 424 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL D.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. DIVISION [Number]

STIPULATION FOR JOINT APPENDIX. KAMALA D. HARRIs Attorney General of California. DOUGLAS J. WOODS Senior Assistant Attorney General

No. 29, 433. THE STATE OF TEXAS, ) IN THE 13th DISTRICT ) COURT Plaintiff, ) ) NAVARRO COUNTY, TEXAS v. ) ) GWENDOLYN XXX, ) ) Defendant.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Proceedings Relative to Debarment and Suspension from Contracting Appendix D: Rules of Practice in

MOTION TO STRIKE OPENING BRIEF; PROPOSED ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

PARKER, et al., THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., STIPULATION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF PURSUANT TO RULES OF COURT, RULE 8.

Case 3:13-cv EMC Document 736 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case GMB Doc 207 Filed 12/21/13 Entered 12/21/13 14:45:36 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 2

Case KJC Doc 195 Filed 08/22/18 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Debtor.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (OAKLAND DIVISION)

COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION 2. CALGUNS FOUNDATION INC., et al v. COUNTY OF SAN MATEO

mkv Doc 458 Filed 04/12/17 Entered 04/12/17 14:12:28 Main Document Pg 1 of 5 : : : : : : : )

AS MODIFIED. Attorneys for Plaintiff, STERLING SAVINGS BANK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:17-cr KBF Document 819 Filed 06/11/18 Page ORDERED. 1 of 8 GUIDELINES REGARDING APPROPRIATE USE OF 302 FORMS IN CRIMINAL TRIALS

I will continue to provide updates to creditors as relevant matters arise.

REQUEST FOR PUBLICATION OF OPINION. Andre Torigian v. WT Capital Lender Services Case No. F (Fresno County Superior Court No.

Case pwb Doc 1093 Filed 11/20/14 Entered 11/20/14 11:00:52 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 8

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

Case 2:16-bk BB Doc 803 Filed 08/17/17 Entered 08/17/17 10:13:04 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Case rfn11 Doc 1013 Filed 02/17/17 Entered 02/17/17 15:47:39 Page 1 of 11

Case 8:14-bk ES Doc 181 Filed 10/08/14 Entered 10/08/14 14:13:05 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 5

Attachment 14 to Form AT-105

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. CINDY LEE GARCIA, an individual, Case No. CV MWF (VBKx) Plaintiff,

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

rbk Doc#81-1 Filed 09/14/17 Entered 09/14/17 14:55:48 Exhibit A Pg 1 of 8 EXHIBIT A

INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENT

State your full name, social security number, date of birth, residence address, and telephone number.

Purpose of Mandatory Fee Arbitration

Case: EEB Doc#:19 Filed:12/04/14 Entered:12/04/14 15:24:27 Page1 of 6

Case MFW Doc Filed 05/13/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Transcription:

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 61 Page ID #:2023 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SANDRA R. BROWN Acting United States Attorney THOMAS D. COKER Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Tax Division VALERIE L. MAKAREWICZ (Cal Bar No. 229637) JAMES C. HUGHES (Cal. Bar No. 263878) Assistant United States Attorney Federal Building, Suite 7211 300 North Los Angeles Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Telephone: (213) 894-2729 Facsimile: (213) 894-0115 E-mail: Valerie.Makarewicz@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA v. SEAN DAVID MORTON, et al. Defendants. No. CR 2:15-00611-SVW SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING RE: DEFENDANT S MOTION IN LIMINE NO.3; EXHIBITS Trial Date: 4/4/2017 Trial Time: 9:00 a.m. Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, the United States Attorney for the Central District of California and Assistant United States Attorneys James C. Hughes and Valerie L. Makarewicz, hereby files supplemental briefing regarding the Court s ruling of March 29, 2017, Docket No. 171, with respect to the motion in limine number 3 filed by defendant Melissa Morton, filed March 13, 2017, Docket No. 123, specifically with respect to the introduction of and reference to the defendants bankruptcy case at trial in the government s case in chief. /// 1

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 2 of 61 Page ID #:2024 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 I. Facts In her motion in limine number 3, defendant Melissa Morton (hereinafter defendant ) moved to preclude evidence of her prior bad acts in relation to certain filings and the meeting of creditors in her Chapter 7 bankruptcy case, In re Sean David Morton, et al., Case No. 2:13-bk-26725-BB (C.D.C.A.), filed with co-defendant Sean David Morton. In the opposition to defendant s motion in limine on this issue, the government argued as to why the statements of defendant should be introduced at trial in the government s case in chief. GOVERNMENT S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT MELISSA MORTON S MOTIONS IN LIMINE, Docket No. 142, pp. 7-17. The government argued that the statement of defendants are direct evidence of their lack of good faith, as they distanced themselves from the tax returns wherein they claimed false Form 1099-OID income, denied the existence of bank accounts they owned, and denied their ownership of Heaven & Earth, LLC. In the Court s Order of March 29, 2017, Docket No. 171, the Court agreed that the statements made by defendants are relevant to the intent or state of mind of defendants, it reserved ruling on this evidentiary challenge depending on what evidence is introduced to connect the Defendants to the bank account and the business. Order, p. 7. However, the Court precluded the government from describing the type of proceeding at which the statement were made, as such information is not relevant and could be prejudicial to Defendants. Id. /// 28 2

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 3 of 61 Page ID #:2025 1 II. Argument 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 In an attempt to brief the Court as to this issue prior to the trial, and so as to not waste the Court s or jury s time, the governments herein provides further briefing regarding the issue of defendants bankruptcy, and the interplay of such event within the government s case-in-chief. The government provides this information to assist the Court in showing the relevance of the defendants bankruptcies to the government s case in chief, and to show that any prejudicial effect to the defendants is greatly outweighed by the probative value of this information to providing defendants intend to deceive. First, as to defendants use of Heaven & Earth, LLC bank accounts, at trial, the government will call a custodian of record from Bank of America, who will testify regarding the ownership of this account in the name of Heaven & Earth, LLC, by defendants. The government also intends on introducing the various checks from defendants bond clients which defendants endorsed and deposited into said account. This should alleviate the Court s concern that the government provide proof of the defendants ownership of bank accounts of Heaven & Earth, LLC. Defendants filing for personal bankruptcy protection arises in the context of the marketing of the bond process by defendants to their clients. The government intends on calling Shelly Clark, a representative from Executive and Advocate Services, State of California, Franchise Tax Board (FTB). As alleged in Counts 10 and 34, prior to filing personal bankruptcy, on or around May 10, 2014, defendants mailed the Franchise Tax Board a $1 million bond to 28 3

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 4 of 61 Page ID #:2026 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 extinguish defendant Sean David Morton s outstanding state tax debt with the FTB. On July 18, 2014, the FTB sent defendant Sean David Morton a Lien Release Notice. Attached hereto and marked Exhibit A is a copy of this Notice. Then, on March 25, 2015, Ms. Clark, on behalf of the FTB, mailed defendant Sean David Morton, and explained to him that the FTB s lien was released on July 18, 2014, not because the FTB had accepted his bond, but rather, because he and co-defendant Melissa Morton had filed bankruptcy. Attached hereto and marked Exhibit B is a copy of this letter by Ms. Clark. However, the government will introduce evidence that even after receiving this explanation from Ms. Clark, defendants continued to sell their fake bonds to their clients. One such client, Barbara Lavender, will be a witness for the government, and is expected to testify that defendants provided her with a copy of the FTB s Lien Release Notice as proof that defendants bond scheme worked. Mrs. Lavender will testify that defendants did not explain to her or her (now deceased) husband that the FTB s lien against defendant Sean David Morton was released due to defendants filing personal bankruptcy. This information is especially relevant, as it shows that despite warnings to the contrary, defendants persisted in selling their bond products to their clients. Further, the government intends on calling Sam Leslie, a Chapter 7 Panel Trustee in this district. He administered the meeting of creditors on July 25, 2013 and September 6, 2013, which was recorded and transcribed. Through his testimony, the government intends to introduce the relevant statements made by defendants, which includes their admission that they own Heaven & Earth, LLC. 28 4

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 5 of 61 Page ID #:2027 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Attached herein and marked Exhibits C and D are copies of the transcript of the portions of the meetings to which the government intends to introduce through Mr. Leslie. As the Court can see, that defendants filed bankruptcy is interwoven throughout the hearing for example, the defendants were asked at both meetings if their bankruptcy petition and schedules are true and correct, and defendants answered in the affirmative. As the government will show at trial, this was patently false, as defendants omitted bank accounts they owned from their schedules, as well as denied the existence of Heaven & Earth, LLC until the attorney for the U.S. Trustee s Office, Kelly Morrison, asked. Further, the government intends on introducing through Leslie that defendant Melissa Morton, a managing member, filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection for Heaven & Earth, LLC on August 24, 2013, a fact which was at issue at the meeting of creditors on September 6, 2013 in defendants personal bankruptcy. In Re Heaven & Earth, LLC, 2:13-bk-31325-BR (C.D. Cal. 2013), Docket No. 1. 1 Throughout the bankruptcy petition, defendant Melissa Morton listed that she and co-defendant were members of Heaven & Earth, LLC, beginning on June 28, 2007 through the filing of the petition, that each defendant owned 25% share of Heaven & Earth, LLC, and she, as its managing member, was in possession of the entity s books and records. Id. In the petition, defendant Melissa Morton listed the 24 25 26 27 28 1 During Mr. Leslie s direct examination, the government intends to ask that the Court take judicial notice of the petition for the defendants personal bankruptcy and the petition in the bankruptcy for Heaven & Earth, LLC, under FRE 201. Certified copies will be introduced, and FRE 801(d)(2), the petitions are statements by defendants against their interests. 5

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 6 of 61 Page ID #:2028 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Heaven & Earth, LLC bank account at Bank of America as one of the assets of Heaven & Earth, LLC. Id. Finally, the mere fact that defendants filed bankruptcy shows that defendants did not believe in their own program of debt relief through their bond process, but rather, relied on the protection of the Bankruptcy Court from their creditors. Again, this is another strong indicia of the defendants lack of good faith in their bond scheme. III. Conclusion For these reasons, the probative value of the interplay defendants bankruptcy is far outweighed by the prejudicial effect to the jury knowing that defendants declared personal bankruptcy, as well as knowing that defendant Melissa Morton filed bankruptcy on behalf of Heaven & Earth, LLC shortly thereafter. The facts surrounding defendants bankruptcies are indicative of their untruthful characters and their lack of reliance on their own schemes as a valid method of paying off taxes and debts, as a defense previewed by defendant Melissa Morton at the hearing on March 29, 2017. Further, to the extent the court believes that the reference to the bankruptcy proceeding is prejudicial, the Court can instruct the jury to not weigh that fact against the defendants. The Court can direct the jury to not draw any adverse inference from the fact that defendants filed bankruptcy, as filing bankruptcy is their right under law. With these additional facts, the government hopes that the Court has a clearer understanding of the interplay of defendants 28 6

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 7 of 61 Page ID #:2029 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 bankruptcies within the government s case in chief, and requests that the Court permit the government to refer to said bankruptcies, as the bankruptcies are extremely relevant to this case, and any prejudicial effect upon defendants is far outweighed by the probative value into defendants character and their good faith defense. Any prejudice against defendants can be cured by an instruction from this Court. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: March 31, 2017 Respectfully submitted, SANDRA R. BROWN Acting United States Attorney THOMAS D. COKER Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Tax Division /s/ JAMES C. HUGHES VALERIE L. MAKAREWICZ Assistant United States Attorneys Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 7

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 8 of 61 Page ID #:2030

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 9 of 61 Page ID #:2031

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 10 of 61 Page ID #:2032

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 11 of 61 Page ID #:2033

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 12 of 61 Page ID #:2034

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 13 of 61 Page ID #:2035

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 14 of 61 Page ID #:2036

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 15 of 61 Page ID #:2037

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 16 of 61 Page ID #:2038

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 17 of 61 Page ID #:2039

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 18 of 61 Page ID #:2040

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 19 of 61 Page ID #:2041

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 20 of 61 Page ID #:2042

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 21 of 61 Page ID #:2043

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 22 of 61 Page ID #:2044

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 23 of 61 Page ID #:2045

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 24 of 61 Page ID #:2046

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 25 of 61 Page ID #:2047

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 26 of 61 Page ID #:2048

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 27 of 61 Page ID #:2049

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 28 of 61 Page ID #:2050

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 29 of 61 Page ID #:2051

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 30 of 61 Page ID #:2052

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 31 of 61 Page ID #:2053

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 32 of 61 Page ID #:2054

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 33 of 61 Page ID #:2055

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 34 of 61 Page ID #:2056

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 35 of 61 Page ID #:2057

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 36 of 61 Page ID #:2058

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 37 of 61 Page ID #:2059

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 38 of 61 Page ID #:2060

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 39 of 61 Page ID #:2061

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 40 of 61 Page ID #:2062

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 41 of 61 Page ID #:2063

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 42 of 61 Page ID #:2064

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 43 of 61 Page ID #:2065

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 44 of 61 Page ID #:2066

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 45 of 61 Page ID #:2067

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 46 of 61 Page ID #:2068

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 47 of 61 Page ID #:2069

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 48 of 61 Page ID #:2070

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 49 of 61 Page ID #:2071

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 50 of 61 Page ID #:2072

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 51 of 61 Page ID #:2073

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 52 of 61 Page ID #:2074

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 53 of 61 Page ID #:2075

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 54 of 61 Page ID #:2076

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 55 of 61 Page ID #:2077

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 56 of 61 Page ID #:2078

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 57 of 61 Page ID #:2079

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 58 of 61 Page ID #:2080

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 59 of 61 Page ID #:2081

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 60 of 61 Page ID #:2082

Case 2:15-cr-00611-SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 61 of 61 Page ID #:2083 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PROOF OF SERVICE BY FIRST CLASS MAIL I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action. I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose direction the service was made. I am employed by the Office of United States Attorney, Central District of California. My business address is 300 North Los Angeles Street, Suite 7211, Los Angeles, California 90012. On March 31, 2017, I served, SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING RE: DEFENDANT S MOTION IN LIMINE NO.3; EXHIBITS, on the person or entity named below by enclosing a copy in an envelope addressed as shown below and placing the envelope for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below following our ordinary office practices. I am readily familiar with the practice of this office for collection and processing correspondence for first class mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid. Date of mailing March 31, 2017, Place of mailing: Los Angeles, CA. Person(s) and/or Entity(s) to whom mailed: Sean David Morton 565 Pier Avenue Box 1274 Hermosa Beach, CA 90274-1274 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration is executed at Los Angeles, California, on March 31, 2017. /s/ AFH AMANDA F. HERNANDEZ