Nielsen Examines the TV Viewership to the Presidential and VP Debates. Sept/Oct 2008

Similar documents
Nielsen s Pre-Convention Scorecard. Details on Candidates Online presence, Advertising campaigns and TV Ratings for Past Conventions

SMGX Strategic Intelligence Insider s Look. Election Night Broadcast Network Evening News Average Live Ratings by Demographic November 6, 2012

ISSUES IN FOCUS ROAD TO THE APRIL 26 TH CONTESTS

TREND INSIGHTS CABLE TV IS THE DOMINANT SOURCE FOR POLITICAL COVERAGE

Shareholders Day. September 11, 2009

KIRO 7 EYEWITNESS NEWS Is Seattle s Late News Choice

The Changing Face of Labor,

2008 Voter Turnout Brief

Useful Vot ing Informat ion on Political v. Ente rtain ment Sho ws. Group 6 (3 people)

North Carolina Statewide General Election Poll Results September 4 7, 2018

THE POLITICO-GWU BATTLEGROUND POLL

Issues vs. the Horse Race

Clinton Lead Cut to 8% in Michigan (Clinton 49% - Trump 41%- Johnson 3% - Stein 1%)

The Digital Road to the White House: Insights on the Political Landscape Online

Renaissance in Reverse? The 2016 Hollywood Writers Report

HART RESEARCH ASSOCIATES/PUBLIC OPINION STRATEGIES Study # page 1

KIRO 7 EYEWITNESS NEWS Holds Late News Ratings Crown

WHY ASIAN AMERICANS AND PACIFIC ISLANDERS SHOULD VOTE

Latinos and the 2008 Presidential Elections: a Visual Data Base

Election Watch: Campaign 2008 Final

2008 Electoral Vote Preliminary Preview

Please note: additional data sources are referenced throughout this presentation, including national exit polls and NBC/WSJ national survey data.

Civitas Institute North Carolina Statewide Poll Results October 18 21, 2018

THE NEW NEWS AUDIENCE 12 ways consumers have changed in the digital age

2016 USF-Nielsen Sunshine State Survey Data Release 2

Datamar Inc. Florida Statewide Survey Presidential General Election. October 31, 2008

131,815,386. The Growth Majority: Understanding The New American Mainstream. Today, there are. Multicultural Americans in the U.S.

Rock the Vote September Democratic Strategic Analysis by Celinda Lake, Joshua E. Ulibarri, and Karen M. Emmerson

KIRO 7 EYEWITNESS NEWS Is Seattle s Late News Choice

StarTribune.com The #1 Local Media Website. Page 1

SECTION 1. Demographic and Economic Profiles of California s Population

MEMORANDUM INTERESTED PARTIES FROM: ED GOEAS BATTLEGROUND POLL DATE: SEPTEMBER 16, The Tarrance Group Page 1

Hart Research Associates/Public Opinion Strategies Study # page 1

US MOBILE NEWS SEEKING TRENDS. Based on October September 2015 data. Excerpted from a full findings report delivered November 2015.

Latinos and the 2008 Presidential Election: A Visual Database

Creating Inclusive Communities

Iraq Most Closely Followed and Covered News Story

Cable News Networks Mostly Favorable Among N.C. Voters

THE PRESIDENTIAL RACE HEADING INTO THE FIRST DEBATE September 21-24, 2008

Rural Pulse 2019 RURAL PULSE RESEARCH. Rural/Urban Findings March 2019

The Political Geography of Virginia and Florida: Bookends of the New South

FOX NEWS HAS MOST TRUSTED COVERAGE, OR NOT, QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY NATIONAL POLL FINDS; TINA FEY, DENNIS MILLER TOP CHOICES TO REPLACE STEWART

Overview. Strategic Imperatives. Our Organization. Finance and Budget. Path to Victory

Who Really Voted for Obama in 2008 and 2012?

THE AP-GfK POLL. Conducted by GfK Roper Public Affairs & Media

Representational Bias in the 2012 Electorate

Nonvoters in America 2012

Coverage of Obama Seen as Largely Fair WEEK S MAJOR NEWS STORIES DRAW DIFFERENT AUDIENCES

1615 L Street, NW, Suite 700 Washington, DC (main) (fax)

City of Carrollton. Final Report. February 6, Prepared by The Julian Group

Union Voters and Democrats

High Marks for Obama s Speech AFTER BUSY WEEK, VIEWS OF BOTH CANDIDATES IMPROVE

Clinton Maintains 3% Lead in Michigan (Clinton 47% - Trump 44% - Johnson 4% - Stein 1%)

Hispanic Market Demographics

Clinton Lead Cut in Half from August (Clinton 47% - Trump 42% in 2-way and Clinton 45% - Trump 39% in 4-way)

ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES (AAMC) NOVEMBER NATIONAL SURVEY MEMO SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

Old Dominion University / Virginian Pilot Poll #3 June 2012

Household Income, Poverty, and Food-Stamp Use in Native-Born and Immigrant Households

NABPAC 2016 Biennial Post Election Conference

Public Opinion on Health Care Issues November 2012

Democracy Corps National/Presidential Battleground Frequency Questionnaire

Obama s Majority and Republican Marginalization

Florida Survey 2008 Presidential General Election

MIGRATION STATISTICS AND BRAIN DRAIN/GAIN

2008 Legislative Elections

Seattle News Viewers Weather the Storm With KIRO 7 EYEWITNESS NEWS

KIRO 7 EYEWITNESS NEWS Wins Late News Ratings Crown

Civitas Institute North Carolina Statewide Poll Results November 17 19, 2018

Typology Group Profiles

Hillary Clinton Leading the Democratic Race in California

The New Metropolitan Geography of U.S. Immigration

Voters Economic Jitters Shake the Race in Virginia

SNL Appearance, Wardrobe Flap Register Widely PALIN FATIGUE NOW RIVALS OBAMA FATIGUE

NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY Legislative Services Office

NBC News/WSJ/Marist Poll Iowa September 20, 2012 Presidential Election Questionnaire

Newspaper Audience Database

A Portrait of Philadelphia Migration Who is coming to the city and who is leaving

Romney Leads in Confidence on Recovery But Obama Escapes Most Economic Blame

Paul M. Sommers Alyssa A. Chong Monica B. Ralston And Andrew C. Waxman. March 2010 MIDDLEBURY COLLEGE ECONOMICS DISCUSSION PAPER NO.

Herald-Tribune. Sarasota/Bradenton/Venice Market

2012 Presidential Race Is its Own Perfect Storm

Bringing Vitality to Main Street How Immigrant Small Businesses Help Local Economies Grow

The Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program Robert Puentes, Fellow

ANNUAL SURVEY REPORT: REGIONAL OVERVIEW

PERCEIVED ACCURACY AND BIAS IN THE NEWS MEDIA A GALLUP/KNIGHT FOUNDATION SURVEY

Running head: PARTY DIFFERENCES IN POLITICAL PARTY KNOWLEDGE

Clinton Leads by 13% in Michigan before Last Debate (Clinton 51% - Trump 38%- Johnson 6% - Stein 2%)

Trump Has Huge 4:1 Lead Over Kasich, Rubio and Cruz (Trump 41%, Kasich 11%, Cruz 11%, Rubio 10%)

The People, The Press and The War In The Gulf. A Special Times Mirror News Interest Index

Disruptive Demographics: Implications for North Carolina s Health and Competitiveness

Original data on policy leaders appointed

Summary and Interpretation of the Federal Bureau of Investigation s Uniform Crime Report, 2005

Univision Delivers The Valuable Hispanic Audience

INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY

New HampshireElection IssuesSurvey. Wave3. December13,2007

In battleground Virginia, Clinton beating all Republicans in 2016 presidential matchups; GOP voters divided, with Bush up, Christie down

The Pentagon Is Manipulating the U.S. Presidential Election!! The Pentagon has been manipulating U.S. elections for the past 50 years!!

American Politics and Foreign Policy

Le Sueur County Demographic & Economic Profile Prepared on 7/12/2018

THE PRESIDENTIAL RACE AND THE DEBATES October 3-5, 2008

Transcription:

Nielsen Examines the TV Viewership to the Presidential and VP Debates Sept/Oct 2008

Nielsen Examines TV Viewership to the Presidential and VP Debates, September/October 2008 As the race to the White House continues, two of the four scheduled debates have been telecast delivering significant viewership. The first debate between presidential hopefuls Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois and Sen. John McCain of Arizona was telecast live on Friday, September 26, 2008 from approximately 9:00 to 10:45 EST. The sole Vice Presidential debate between Sen. Joseph Biden of Delaware and Governor Sarah Palin of Alaska aired live on Thursday, October 2, 2008 from approximately 9:00 to 10:30 EST. The same eleven ad-supported Broadcast and Cable networks covered each event. The following analysis from The Nielsen Company examines the combined delivery for both debates across all channels and provides a breakdown of their viewer characteristics. Also, a snapshot of the debates local rating performance provides insight as to the top and bottom ranked metered markets. Key findings from The Nielsen Company: The Vice Presidential debate (41.7 HH rtg) over-delivered the first Presidential debate (31.6 HH rtg) by 32% among homes and 33% among total persons. Note that TV usage was 14% stronger among homes on the Thursday night of the VP debate versus the Friday night of the first Presidential election (69.3 HUT vs. 60.7 HUT). Sixty-one percent of all U.S. households tuned in to at least one of the 2008 debates thus far. Nearly half of all homes (49.8%) viewed at least 6 minutes of the VP debate last Thursday, up from the first Presidential debate that reached 41.5% of HHs. 11.2% of all households tuned to just the Presidential debate, and 19.5% tuned to just the VP debate. Another 30.3% of all households tuned to both debates. Breaking down the minute-by-minute ratings, household viewership was very steady throughout both the Presidential debate and the VP debate. P55+ made up the largest portion of the debate audience (42-46%), although each of the younger demos did compile a slightly larger piece of the audience for the VP debate vs. the Presidential debate. For the most part, the debates had similar audiences in that their viewers were more likely to be white, have higher incomes (100K+), and have a higher education (4+ yrs college). Head of homes that are African Americans made up a larger portion of the Presidential debate audience (14.0%) than the VP debate audience (12.3%) as well as the TV norm (12.2%). Hispanics were less likely to watch the debates, as Hispanic households made up only 6.3%-6.5% of the overall debates audience, strongly under the TV norm of 11.1% homes headed by Hispanics. The debates have drawn more viewers to their TV sets, as TV usage was stronger than the norm for each respective night of the debates. Across the 55 metered markets, Baltimore had the most tuning for each of the debates. St. Louis, host city for the Vice Presidential debate, saw strong viewership posting a 77.9 share. See below for more details. Page 1 of 7

National Delivery Ratings Nationally, the first Presidential debate produced a combined rating of 31.6 among households, translating to 36.2 million homes on average. Among total viewers (P2+), the debate garnered an 18.1 gross rating or 52.4 million average viewers. The Vice Presidential debate delivered a combined rating of 41.7 among homes, translating to 47.8 million households on average. Among total viewers, the VP debate posted a 24.0 gross rating or 70.0 million average viewers. The VP debate over-delivered the first Presidential debate by 32% among Households and 33% among total persons. Note that TV usage was 14% stronger among homes on the Thursday night of the VP debate versus the Friday night of the first Presidential debate (69.3 HUT vs. 60.7 HUT). When looking at total available audience (share), the VP debate with a 60.2 HH share out-performed the Presidential debate (52.0 HH share) by 16%. It is interesting to note that homes headed by African Americans over-delivered the total persons rating for the Presidential debate, but not so for the VP debate. Presidential Debate 1 and Vice Presidential Debate - 2008 Sum of Networks (L+SD) Pres Debate 1-9/26/08 VP Debate 10/2/08 Rating Projection Rating Projection All Households 31.6 36,224,000 41.7 47,795,000 Persons 2+ 18.1 52,418,000 24.0 69,989,000 Males 18+ 20.5 22,250,000 28.1 30,409,000 Females 18+ 23.3 27,093,000 30.7 35,706,000 African-American P2+ 19.5 7,174,000 21.8 8,067,000 Hispanic P2+ 8.2 3,456,000 10.2 4,394,000 White P2+ 19.4 41,079,000 26.7 56,779,000 Combined Reach of Debates Sixty-one percent of all U.S. households tuned in to at least one of the 2008 debates thus far. Nearly half of all homes (49.8%) viewed at least 6 minutes of the VP debate last Thursday, up from the first Presidential debate that reached 41.5% of HHs. The VP debate saw larger audiences than the Presidential debate across all ages, as well. This isn t too surprising given the buzz surrounding the VP debate and its larger available audience on Thursday night. The cumulative audience for each debate increased with age; the debates reached just 19.5% of the youngest voting segment of 18-24, however it reached nearly 3 times (59.6%) that of the oldest segment of 55+ voters. Page 2 of 7

Debates Reach % by Age 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 41.5 49.8 61.0 23.6 29.7 38.4 28.6 35.6 45.6 6.0 7.8 12.2 7.1 12.1 16.4 10.4 13.2 19.5 20.6 27.2 36.6 25.3 34.3 44.2 30.2 39.0 49.3 41.4 47.9 59.6 HH P2+ P18+ P2-11 P12-17 P18-24 P25-34 P35-44 P45-54 P55+ P Debate VP Debate Either Only-Only-Both of the Debates Overall unduplicated household reach to either debate was 61.0%, meaning 39.0% of all homes did not tune in to either debate. 30.3% of households watched both the Presidential and the Vice Presidential debate, while 11.2% viewed only the Presidential debate and 19.5% saw only the VP debate. OOB Reach % 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 61.0 30.3 45.6 38.4 18.6 14.9 19.5 14.8 16.9 11.2 8.7 10.0 HH P2+ P18+ Both Only VP Debate Only P Debate Minute By Minute Household viewership was very steady throughout both the first Presidential debate and the Vice Presidential debate, as shown in the chart below which graphs the minute by minute HH gross rating. From 9:05pm to 10:40pm, the first Presidential debate delivered over a 30.0 rating, peaking with a 32.9 rating at 9:38pm. Ratings for the VP debate were above a 40.2 rating from 9:06 through the end of the telecast (10:30pm), peaking with a 43.3 rating at 9:44pm and 9:55pm. Ratings for the VP debate consistently out-delivered the Presidential debate, with the increase ranging from 30%-36%. Page 3 of 7

Debates Minute by Minute HH Gross Rating 50 40 30 20 10 0 9:00 9:08 9:16 9:24 9:32 9:40 9:48 9:56 10:04 10:12 10:20 10:28 10:36 10:44 P Debate VP Debate Audience Composition Similar to the reach, the debates audiences were largest among the older demographic group and decreased with the younger demos. Each younger demo (below P55+) did make up a slightly larger piece of the audience for the VP debate vs. the Presidential debate, which lowered the older P55+ composition from 45.9% to 41.7% of all viewers. The median age was 2 years younger for the VP debate than the Presidential debate (52 vs. 54 among P18+). This age difference may be attributed to additional younger viewers being available to watch on a Thursday night than a Friday night (when the Presidential debate aired). 100% Audience Composition by Age 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 45.9% 18.1% 14.4% 41.7% 18.7% 15.2% 20% 10% 0% 12.0% 11.1% 5.8% 7.0% 2.1% 2.8% 2.6% 2.7% P Debate VP Debate P2-11 P12-17 P18-24 P25-34 P35-44 P45-54 P55+ Household Viewership Profile The chart below profiles homes that watched each debate. For the most part, the debates had similar audiences in that their viewers were more likely to be white, have higher incomes (100K+), have a higher Page 4 of 7

education (4+yrs college), and live in the Northeast or Southeast (although the live nature of these telecasts may be driving the viewing by region). Head of homes that are African Americans made up a larger portion of the Presidential debate audience (14.0%) than the VP debate audience (12.3%) as well as the TV norm (12.2%). Hispanics were less likely to watch the debates, as Hispanic households made up only 6.3%-6.5% of the debates overall audience, strongly under the TV norm of 11.1% homes headed by Hispanics. HH Viewership Profile Pres Debate 1 VP Debate UE Debate Index Debate Index HOH Ethnicity White 76.1% 78.4% 103 81.0% 106 African American 12.2% 14.0% 115 12.3% 101 Other 11.6% 7.9% 68 7.3% 63 HOH Origin Hispanic 11.1% 6.5% 59 6.3% 57 Non-Hispanic 88.9% 93.4% 105 93.8% 106 HH Income <20K 14.7% 14.5% 99 12.7% 87 20K - <40K 22.9% 19.9% 87 18.7% 82 40K - <60K 19.5% 16.3% 84 17.0% 87 60K - <100K 25.9% 24.2% 93 24.5% 95 100K+ 17.1% 25.3% 148 27.4% 160 HOH Education <9 Yrs Grade School 3.4% 3.2% 94 2.3% 67 1-3 Yrs High School 7.1% 6.4% 91 5.6% 79 4 Yrs HS/Graduate 23.0% 27.9% 122 26.1% 114 1-3 Yrs College 34.4% 26.5% 77 27.4% 80 4+Yrs College 32.1% 34.5% 107 36.1% 112 Region/Territory East Central 12.8% 12.8% 100 12.6% 98 Northeast 19.9% 21.6% 108 22.1% 111 Pacific 19.3% 17.4% 90 16.2% 84 Southeast 20.9% 23.2% 111 22.7% 109 Southwest 11.7% 10.4% 89 10.7% 91 West Central 15.4% 14.7% 96 15.8% 103 TV Usage The debates have drawn more viewers to their TV sets on their respective nights than normal. Similar to the Presidential debate (where HUT levels were 12% above Friday norms), the VP debate also posted stronger usage among homes when compared to the prior Thursday night (9/25/08, +9.4%) and the equivalent Thursday last year (10/4/07, +10.5%). All age breaks also saw increases in usage levels with the VP debate. Presidential Debate 1 Usage Comparison: Friday 9:00-10:45 HUT/PUT - Live+SD - Live Feed HHLD P2+ P18+ P2-11 P12-17 P18-24 P25-34 P35-44 P45-54 P55+ 9/26/2008 60.7 38.6 43.3 22.8 22.6 25.9 34.1 39.0 45.1 56.7 9/19/2008 54.2 33.3 36.1 25.1 20.9 20.2 29.7 32.1 37.9 47.4 9/28/2007 54.1 33.0 35.8 24.9 21.5 21.5 27.4 30.8 36.9 48.7 09/26/08 vs 09/19/08 12.1% 16.0% 19.7% -9.2% 8.1% 28.6% 14.8% 21.7% 19.0% 19.6% 09/26/08 vs 09/28/07 12.3% 17.0% 20.8% -8.4% 5.1% 20.7% 24.4% 26.6% 22.0% 16.6% Page 5 of 7

Vice Presidential Debate Usage Comparison: Thursday 9:00-10:30 HUT/PUT - Live+SD - Live Feed HHLD P2+ P18+ P2-11 P12-17 P18-24 P25-34 P35-44 P45-54 P55+ 10/2/2008 69.3 45.3 51.0 23.6 29.4 35.0 42.5 47.7 53.5 62.5 9/25/2008 63.3 39.7 44.3 21.7 27.9 31.5 38.6 41.1 45.9 53.4 10/4/2007 62.7 38.6 43.0 22.1 26.5 30.8 37.3 38.7 43.7 53.3 10/02/08 vs 09/25/08 9.4% 14.0% 15.1% 8.7% 5.4% 10.9% 10.1% 16.1% 16.5% 17.0% 10/02/08 vs 10/04/07 10.5% 17.3% 18.6% 6.7% 11.2% 13.6% 13.9% 23.4% 22.4% 17.3% Local Ratings Across the 55 metered markets, the VP debate had a 45.0 live HH rating, which is substantially higher (30%) than the 34.7 HH rating to the first presidential debate. Top 10 Markets to Pres Debate 1: The top 10 tuning markets to the first presidential debate are listed below along with their ratings to the VP debate. Five of these ten markets were not among the top 10 tuning markets to the VP debate. Baltimore had the most tuning among all of the metered markets for each of the debates. Market RTGs Top 10 to Pres Debate 1 09/26/2008 - Pres Debate 1 10/02/2008 - VP Debate SHR (000) Baltimore 47.7 66.0 522 1 59.1 74.3 651 1 Memphis 47.5 63.0 316 2 51.4 66.1 346 12 Washington, DC (Hagrstwn) 44.7 68.0 1034 3 51.2 72.8 1192 13 Norfolk-Portsmth-Newpt Nws 43.5 61.0 317 4 53.9 67.7 389 4 Charlotte 42.0 58.0 457 5 51.6 67.9 580 11 Richmond-Petersburg 41.9 57.0 221 6 52.1 67.8 286 8 Nashville 40.8 60.0 396 7 53.4 68.1 543 5 Miami-Ft. Lauderdale 40.6 56.0 629 8 44.8 61.8 693 31 St. Louis 40.5 63.0 508 9 58.3 77.9 730 2 Greensboro-H.Point-W.Salem 40.2 57.0 273 10 48.0 65.4 328 22 RTG Rank RTGs SHR (000) RTG Rank Top 10 Markets to VP Debate: While the first presidential debate was heavily viewed in the battleground states of Virginia, North Carolina, and Florida, the VP debates also ranked highly in battleground states. The battleground states that were included in the top 10 markets to the VP debate include Missouri (St. Louis and Kansas City), Virginia (Norfolk and Richmond), and Pennsylvania (Pittsburgh). Four of the top ten markets to the VP debate are among the ten highest penetration African American metered markets. Interesting to note that St. Louis, which hosted the Vice Presidential debate, had the strongest share delivery (77.9) of the top 10 metered markets. Page 6 of 7

Market RTGs Top 10 to VP Debate 09/26/2008 - Pres Debate 1 10/02/2008 - VP Debate SHR (000) Baltimore 47.7 66.0 522 1 59.1 74.3 651 1 St. Louis 40.5 63.0 508 9 58.3 77.9 730 2 Boston (Manchester) 39.8 58.0 954 13 54.3 72.9 1310 3 Norfolk-Portsmth-Newpt Nws 43.5 61.0 317 4 53.9 67.7 389 4 Nashville 40.8 60.0 396 7 53.4 68.1 543 5 West Palm Beach-Ft. Pierce 39.6 59.0 308 14 53.4 71.9 416 5 Kansas City 36.6 59.0 339 18 53.2 74.8 499 7 Richmond-Petersburg 41.9 57.0 221 6 52.1 67.8 286 8 Pittsburgh 35.6 56.0 412 22 51.9 65.9 602 9 Detroit 35.3 57.0 681 24 51.8 71.1 999 10 RTG Rank RTGs SHR (000) RTG Rank Specs: Viewing sources included ABC, CBS, FOX, NBC, Telefutura, Telemundo, BBC-America, CNBC, CNN, FOX News, and MSNBC. Based on Live+Same Day rating ### Page 7 of 7