IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT S RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF S REQUEST FOR ADMISSION OF FACTS

Similar documents
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT S FIRST INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF

Information or instructions: Combined discovery requests, admissions, production of documents and interrogatories

Cause Number (Complete the heading so it looks exactly like the Petition) In the (check one):

[CAPTION] INTERROGATORIES [NAME AND ADDRESS OF PLAINTIFF S ATTORNEY] Attorneys for Plaintiff TO:

Debt Claim Petition Packet

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 31 Filed: 04/11/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:286

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CENTRE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION - LAW ) ) ) ) ) ) ) OPINION AND ORDER

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT CHANCERY DIVISION COMPLAINT

ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM BUSINESS DISPUTE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. This Court s Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and

Terms of Trade. For the provision of Security Systems Installation and Services By MB Security Ltd

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 55 Filed: 02/25/13 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:525

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MARION COUNTY

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

SMALL CLAIMS IMPORTANT NOTICE:

MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, Plaintiff/Appellee, YARED AMELGA, Defendant/Appellant. No. 1 CA-CV

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

PETITION: EVICTION CASE CASE NO. 4LT With suit for Rent COURT DATE:

DATED 20 HSBC BANK PLC. and [FUNDER] and [COMPANY] DEED OF PRIORITY

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

Case 1:10-cv CFL Document 41 Filed 09/27/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

Illinois Official Reports

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

PREVIEW PLEASE DO NOT COPY THIS DOCUMENT THANK YOU. LegalFormsForTexas.Com

IN RE: DEFENDANT'S PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT BEFORE OLER, J., AND EBERT J. OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT

Dated: Dated: DEFINITIONS

STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF HENNEPIN FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT

JUSTICE COURT CIVIL CASE INFORMATION SHEET ( )

GUARANTEED DEPOSIT ACCOUNT CONTRACT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS

Case 4:10-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/18/10 Page 1 of 9

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE. This settlement agreement was executed by and between Plaintiffs Amelia Thompson

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE September 21, 2011 Session

RSR LIMITED TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SUPPLY (GOODS AND SERVICES)

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Pines Engineering division Ajax Tocco Magnethermic Corporation. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE

Case 1:04-cv RHB Document 171 Filed 08/11/2005 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS DIVISION OF DOMESTIC RELATIONS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO

WASHINGTON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT CIVIL PROCEDURES (Revised June, 2012)

Note to Internet User: If you are acting as your own attorney (that is, if you are Pro Se ), scroll down to find blank forms you may use.

GENERAL INFORMATION FOR FILING SUIT IN JUSTICE COURT

Plaintiff, ) ) ANSWER, COUNTERCLAIM, AND ) THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT v. )

Proposed Rules for First Reading page 2. Rule 4.3 Withdrawal page 2. Rule 5.1 Prompt Completion page 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION. Case No. 3:16-cv-178-J-MCR ORDER

CHAPTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ACT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CASE NO. 3:07-cv-491-RJC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

AMENDED ANSWER TO COMPLAINT AND COMPULSORY COUNTERCLAIM

United States District Court District of Massachusetts

EVICTION SUIT. Justice Court Pct. 2 & 4 of Midland Country, Texas 707 W. Washington Midland, Texas

SHAWNEE BASS JUSTICE OF THE PEACE ERATH COUNTY, PRECINCT 1 EVICTIONS

Discovery. Thea Whalen. Executive Director, TJCTC

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION - LAW

SHAWNEE BASS JUSTICE OF THE PEACE ERATH COUNTY, PRECINCT 1 SMALL CLAIMS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA. vs. Case No: ORDER ESTABLISHING MOTION PRACTICE PROCEDURE

NC General Statutes - Chapter 59 Article 2 1

Case 0:14-cv WPD Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/05/2014 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Kosovo. Regulation No. 2001/5

KATHERINE K. HANNA JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, PCT. #3 BASTROP COUNTY, TEXAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

AMERICAN HOMEOWNER PRESERVATION LLC LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT AMERICAN HOMEOWNER PRESERVATION MANAGEMENT LLC MANAGING MEMBER

CASE 0:13-cv JRT-JJK Document 1 Filed 08/26/13 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) Civil Action

Case: 25CH1:15-cv Document #: 7 Filed: 10/05/2015 Page 1 of 16

LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ACT

Case 1:13-cv PAB-KMT Document 98 Filed 01/20/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 19

Defendants Trial Brief - 1 -

United States District Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO

Information or instructions: Motion Consent of Client & Order to substitute counsel PREVIEW

Leam Trading Pty Ltd t/as Fabre Australia PO Box 6212, Lakemba NSW 2195 Phone: Fax:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY OWENSBORO DIVISION MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS DIVISION OF DOMESTIC RELATIONS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO : JUDGMENT ENTRY OF DEFENDANT : LEGAL SEPARATION

CLIENT APPLICATION FORM Version 2

YOU MAY FIND THESE NEW RULES in Texas Rules of Civil Procedure Part V. Rules of Practice in Justice Courts

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

APPENDIX I SAMPLE INTERROGATORIES

FINAL SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTION LTD TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR THE SUPPLY OF LOGISTICS SERVICES

FILING AN EVICTION SUIT IN JUSTICE COURT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION LADBROKES CORAL GROUP PLC

P H I L L I P S DAYES

APPLICATION FOR COMMERCIAL CREDIT ACCOUNT TRADING TERMS AND CONDITIONS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. vs. L.T. NO.: 3D ON NOTICE TO INVOKE DISCRETIONARY JURISDICTION FROM THE THIRD DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

Note to Internet User: If you are acting as your own attorney (that is, if you are Pro Se ), scroll down to find blank forms you may use.

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION - LAW MEMORANDUM OPINION

MASTER REPURCHASE AGREEMENT. entered into between. THE SOUTH AFRICAN RESERVE BANK (the Bank) and. (the Counterparty)

ISDA International Swap Dealers Association, Inc.

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

In The United States District Court For The Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division. Answer

OPERATING AGREEMENT OF {}, A NEW YORK LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY WITNESSETH: ARTICLE I

SECURED CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE SERIES A FINANCING

AFFIDAVIT, ORDER AND NOTICE OF GARNISHMENT AND ANSWER OF GARNISHEE (PERSONAL EARNINGS) LOGAN, OHIO 105 West Hunter Street NOTARY PUBLIC

Filing # E-Filed 10/09/ :39:26 PM

THE LAW RELATING TO GUARANTEES

Mortgage who is the mortgagee? Is the mortgagee the Plaintiff? Is the mortgagee a corporation or a trust?

Transcription:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF vs. CASE NO. CV DEFENDANT DEFENDANT S RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF S REQUEST FOR ADMISSION OF FACTS The filing of these responses to Plaintiff s discovery should not be construed in any manner to constitute a waiver of any of Defendant s earlier pled affirmative defenses. Defendant is merely complying with the discovery requirements of Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff. 1. You applied for, and received, a credit card account No: from the Response: Insofar as the Plaintiff refers to the alleged assignor admitted. Insofar as the Plaintiff refers to the alleged assignee denied 2. You made purchases or received cash advances using the credit card, leaving a net unpaid balance on the account of $(AMOUNT). 3. When you applied for the credit card, you agreed to make at least the minimum payment due every month on the indebtedness owing by you on the credit card. Page 1 of 6

4. You received the credit card agreement attached to Plaintiff s Complaint, you understood the terms and conditions and you agreed to abide by the terms and conditions imposed thereby. 5. You made at least the minimum monthly payments owing on the credit card account for a period of time. 6. You ceased making the minimum monthly payment on the credit card. 7. You materially breached the terms and conditions of the credit card agreement, leaving you in material default on the credit card agreement. 8. You have refused to pay the principal balance due Plaintiff on the credit card. 9. You owe to Plaintiff the current past due principal balance of $(AMOUNT). Page 2 of 6

10. You owe to Plaintiff interest on the past due balance of $(AMOUNT). 11. You owe to Plaintiff contractual attorney s fees on the unpaid principal balance in the amount of $(AMOUNT). 12. You are legally and financially responsible to the Plaintiff for the indebtedness owing on the credit card. Response: Insofar as the Plaintiff refers to the original creditor on the account denied. Insofar as the Plaintiff refers to the alleged assignee of the account, Defendant denies and demands strict proof that Plaintiff {alleged assignee} is, indeed, the rightful assignee of Defendant s account. 13. You have benefitted, either directly or indirectly, from the use of the credit card. 14. You have not been released from liability by the Plaintiff for this debt. Response: Insofar as the Plaintiff refers to the original creditor denied. Insofar as the Plaintiff refers to the alleged assignee of the account, Defendant denies and demands strict proof that Plaintiff {alleged assignee} is the rightful assignee of Defendant s account and thus possesses valid authority to hold Defendant liable to Plaintiff {alleged assignee} for any alleged debt. Page 3 of 6

15. You did not dispute any of the charges within sixty (60) days of their appearance on your monthly statement as required by your cardholder agreement. 16. There is no legal or factual basis to support any defense, claim or contention asserted by you in your Answer. 17. You do not have any documents that support your contention that the amount claimed due in the Complaint is incorrect. 18. You do not have any legal or factual basis for your contention that a different amount is owed than that claimed by the Plaintiff. 19. You do not have any legal or factual basis for your defense of failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Response: Defendant asserted the defense of failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted in {her} initial responsive pleadings to preserve this affirmative defense. Discovery is ongoing in this case and if Defendant determines through (his/her) investigation that this affirmative defense in not viable, Defendant will withdraw it. As such, Defendant cannot either admit or deny at this time. Page 4 of 6

20. You do not have any legal or factual basis for your defense of lapse of the statute of limitations. 21. You do not have any legal or factual basis for your defense of accord and satisfaction. Response: Defendant asserted the doctrine of accord and satisfaction in {her} initial responsive pleadings to preserve this affirmative defense. Discovery is ongoing in this case and if Defendant determines through {her} investigation that this affirmative defense in not viable, Defendant will withdraw it. As such, Defendant cannot either admit or deny at this time. 22. You do not have any legal or factual basis for your defense of payment. Response: Defendant asserted the doctrine of payment in {her} initial responsive pleadings to preserve this affirmative defense. Discovery is ongoing in this case and if Defendant determines through (his/her) investigation that this affirmative defense in not viable, Defendant will withdraw it. As such, Defendant cannot either admit or deny at this time. 23. You have been credited for all payments made on the account, including any payments made by a third party. Page 5 of 6

24. You do not have any legal or factual basis for your defense of release. Response: Defendant asserted the doctrine of release in {her} initial responsive pleadings to preserve this affirmative defense. Discovery is ongoing in this case and if Defendant determines through (his/her) investigation that this affirmative defense in not viable, Defendant will withdraw it. As such, Defendant cannot either admit or deny at this time. 25. You do not have any legal or factual basis for your defense of waiver. Response: Defendant asserted the doctrine of waiver in (his/her) initial responsive pleadings to preserve this affirmative defense. Discovery is ongoing in this case and if Defendant determines through (his/her) investigation that this affirmative defense in not viable, Defendant will withdraw it. As such, Defendant cannot either admit or deny at this time. 26. You have no defense to this lawsuit. Respectfully submitted this day of, 20 By: ATTORNEY NAME LAW FIRM ABN 2000000 PHONE NUMBER ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT Page 6 of 6