Partnership for Southern Equity GROWING THE FUTURE: The Case for Economic Inclusion in Metro Atlanta. Executive Summary

Similar documents
Partnership for Southern Equity GROWING THE FUTURE: The Case for Economic Inclusion in Metro Atlanta

An Equity Profile of the Southeast Florida Region. Summary. Foreword

An Equity Assessment of the. St. Louis Region

Race, Ethnicity, and Economic Outcomes in New Mexico

Racial Inequities in the Washington, DC, Region

OLDER INDUSTRIAL CITIES

Structural Change: Confronting Race and Class

Report. Poverty and Economic Insecurity: Views from City Hall. Phyllis Furdell Michael Perry Tresa Undem. on The State of America s Cities

PLACE MATTERS FOR HEALTH IN THE SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY:

Like in many regions around the country, leaders in

Cook County Health Strategic Planning Landscape

EMBARGOED UNTIL THURSDAY 9/5 AT 12:01 AM

The Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program Bruce Katz, Director

Protecting and Defending Progress in the Old Dominion

DMI Ad Hoc Committee on Racial Inclusiveness

Racial Inequities in Montgomery County

BIG PICTURE: CHANGING POVERTY AND EMPLOYMENT OUTCOMES IN SEATTLE

Race to Equity. A Project to Reduce Racial Disparities in Dane County

The National Federation of Paralegal Associations, Inc. Position Statement on Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity

The Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program Amy Liu, Deputy Director

Visi n. Imperative 6: A Prosperous Economy

An Equity Profile of. Sunflower County

The Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program Bruce Katz, Director

A Progressive Agenda for Inclusive and Diverse Entrepreneurship

Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, Volume 11, Number 1, p. 195, (2006)

An Equity Profile of. Grand Rapids. Supported by: Insert Map

Confronting Suburban Poverty in the Greater New York Area. Alan Berube, with the Brooking s Institute, presents on Confronting Suburban Poverty:

The Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program Robert Puentes, Fellow

Advancing Equity and Inclusive Growth in San Joaquin Valley: Data for an Equity Policy Agenda

Institute for Public Policy and Economic Analysis

ORIGINS AND EXPERIENCES A GROWING GENERATION OF YOUNG IMMIGRANTS MICHIGAN IMMIGRANTS HAVE VARIED

Chapter 10. Resource Markets and the Distribution of Income. Copyright 2011 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

FUTURE OF GROWTH IN SAN DIEGO: THE ECONOMIC CASE FOR INCLUSION PRODUCED BY

With the notable exception of the migration of Oklahomans to California during the Dust Bowl years in

SOCIAL CHARTER OF THE AMERICAS. (Adopted at the second plenary session, held on June 4, 2012, and reviewed by the Style Committee)

The Latino Electorate in 2010: More Voters, More Non-Voters

Equitable Growth Profile of the. Omaha-Council Bluffs Region 2018 updated analysis

LOOKING FORWARD: DEMOGRAPHY, ECONOMY, & WORKFORCE FOR THE FUTURE

Peruvians in the United States

A Regional Comparison Minneapolis Saint Paul Regional Economic Development Partnership

Towards a Policy Actionable Analysis of Geographic and Racial Health Disparities

STRENGTHENING RURAL CANADA: Fewer & Older: The Coming Demographic Crisis in Rural Ontario

The Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program Robert Puentes, Fellow

The EEO Tabulation: Measuring Diversity in the Workplace ACS Data Users Conference May 29, 2014

Data-Driven Research for Environmental Justice

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

The State of Women of Color in the United States

POLICY AREA A

Poverty: A Social Justice Issue. Jim Southard. Professor David Lucas. Siena Heights University

Spartanburg Racial Equity Index. A Review of Predictors and Outcomes. Metropolitan Studies Institute at USC Upstate. Kathleen Brady, PhD 8/1/18

of the United States, helping drive economic growth and defining national identity since the country s founding.

BLACK-WHITE BENCHMARKS FOR THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH

Neighborhood Diversity Characteristics in Iowa and their Implications for Home Loans and Business Investment

Le Sueur County Demographic & Economic Profile Prepared on 7/12/2018

ROCHESTER-MONROE ANTI-POVERTY INITIATVE RELEASES PROGRESS REPORT

Race & Economic Segregation Milwaukee 4 County Region

Community Advisory Committee Meeting

BY Rakesh Kochhar FOR RELEASE MARCH 07, 2019 FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES:

Race & Economic Segregation Milwaukee 4 County Region

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Race, Space and Youth Labor Market Opportunities in the Capital Region. November 2010

Nebraska s Foreign-Born and Hispanic/Latino Population

We know that the Latinx community still faces many challenges, in particular the unresolved immigration status of so many in our community.

Rural Canada and the Canadian Innovation Agenda

State of Rural Minnesota Report 2014

Population Vitality Overview

Racial Inequities in Fairfax County

Understanding Racial Inequity in Alachua County

An Equity Profile of the. City of Detroit. Supported by:

The Northern Neck region of Virginia, birthplace of both

Poverty in Wisconsin Chippewa Valley, WI September 26, 2014

Foundations of Urban Health. Professor: Dr. Judy Lubin Urban Health Disparities

Building Stronger Communities for Better Health: The Geography of Health Equity

The Brookings Institution

Economic Security. For information on the resources used, please contact Dawn Juker at or call (208)

PUBLISHED BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF CLEVELAND

An Equity Profile of the. Southeast Florida Region

Unlocking Opportunities in the Poorest Communities: A Policy Brief

An Equity Profile of. Las Cruces

Seattle Public Schools Enrollment and Immigration. Natasha M. Rivers, PhD. Table of Contents

The Road to Zero Wealth: How the Racial Wealth Divide is Hollowing Out America s Middle Class and What We Can Do About It

Poverty in Buffalo-Niagara

Wealth in Polk County, Florida

The Brookings Institution

The State of. Working Wisconsin. Update September Center on Wisconsin Strategy

Final Report. Participation of Latino/Hispanic Population in the Food Stamp Program in the South.

Race and Economic Opportunity in the United States

Employment and Immigration

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXTS: ANNIE E. CASEY FOUNDATION CITIES

The National Partnership for New Americans: Principles of Immigrant Integration

Community Health Needs Assessment 2018

President Trump to Upstate Residents: Move to Wisconsin

INEQUALITY: POVERTY AND WEALTH CHAPTER 2

Athens Declaration for Healthy Cities

The Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program Alan Berube, Fellow

THE MEASURE OF AMERICA

Extrapolated Versus Actual Rates of Violent Crime, California and the United States, from a 1992 Vantage Point

CÉSAR M. MELGOZA / FOUNDER & CEO

3Demographic Drivers. The State of the Nation s Housing 2007

Heading in the Wrong Direction: Growing School Segregation on Long Island

Transcription:

Partnership for Southern Equity TO G E T H E R W E P R O S P E R GROWING THE FUTURE: The Case for Economic Inclusion in Metro Atlanta Executive Summary

Atlanta: The Multicultural Jewel of the South The Atlanta region is characterized by magnificent diversity! With non-whites comprising more than half of the region s population, it is home to an exciting mix of people of color representing many races, nationalities, and cultures. Among the non-whites, Black or African American residents are the largest population group, followed by Hispanic or Latino residents and Asian residents. 1 The region has benefited especially from what demographers refer to as the New Great Migration with the influx of African Americans who have moved to the South from the Northern and Midwestern regions. 2 This is largely due to Atlanta s excellent reputation for quality living and decades of success in job growth. However, as can be observed elsewhere in the nation, this growth has not translated into economic opportunity for all. Here in the Atlanta area, a person s potential for social and economic success can still be linked to their zip code. Our imbalanced growth and development patterns have resulted in communities of opportunity and communities of neglect throughout the region. Consider the following: In 2012, Atlanta had the highest ranking of any major city in the U.S. for income inequality. From 2000 to 2008-2012, the city saw a 90 percent increase in the rate of poverty among its residents. 3 When one views the distribution of White and non-white populations in the Atlanta region on a map, a tale of two regions emerges. The spatial dynamics of where people live, where the jobs are, and unemployment point to disparities among Blacks and Whites. 4 While Clayton, DeKalb, and Rockdale counties have the highest percentage of non-white residents, they also have the highest percentage of students eligible for free and reduced price lunch, and high percentages of residents living without health care insurance. 5 Although the Atlanta area has experienced job growth that exceeds that of the nation, data suggests that the majority of the region s workforce may not have the education required by the majority of the jobs created. 6 Atlanta has the exciting opportunity to leverage both its growing multicultural heritage and its preeminence as the economic capital of the American South and become nothing short of a national innovation model for economic inclusion. What is economic inclusion? The Partnership for Southern Equity (PSE) defines economic inclusion as: Increasing equity in the distribution of income, wealth building, employment, and entrepreneurial opportunities for vulnerable populations. In this definition, equity is a step beyond equality because it takes into account that people may not start from the same place and, therefore, equal treatment may not resolve the gap that exists. As the birth home of Martin Luther King, Jr., Atlanta is no stranger to resolving cultural and systemic inequities through dynamic and diverse partnerships. Not only is it the right thing to do again, but it is the only thing to do for Atlanta and her people to realize our full potential. The economic stakes are high. Here s what some recent studies found: While 95 of the largest U.S. metro areas experienced aggregate job and output growth in recent years, smaller numbers have seen improvements in living standards, earnings, and employment, particularly for workers of color. 7 Black families whose heads graduated from college have had about a third less wealth than White families whose heads dropped out of high school. 8 White households have had 18 and 20 times the wealth of Hispanic and Black households, respectively. 9

Relating to these national observations, earlier research by PSE found that White workers in the Atlanta region earn significantly higher monthly wages than Hispanic and Black workers. 10 There are evident barriers to wealth for communities of color, especially Latinos and African Americans, and equal education is not the sole solution. There are also barriers to opportunity. Recent data for the Atlanta region revealed unemployment rates of more than 15 percent among a number of majority non-white neighborhoods. 11 A recent study found that if full employment when everyone who wants a job can find one had been achieved in the metro Atlanta area in 2015, Atlanta s economy would have been $23.6 billion stronger. 12 Economic Inclusion: A Win-Win for Everyone While fostering economic inclusion promises to benefit those who are currently excluded from participating meaningfully in the economy, including many of our low-income communities of color, such efforts have the exciting potential to benefit everyone. Business: Businesses cannot compete effectively without access to the right talent. Access to talent is often the leading reason why businesses choose to stay in a region; it is also often the leading reason why they leave. To meet the growing needs of businesses in the Atlanta region, every aspect of our talent pool, tapped and untapped, must be prepared to engage in the workforce of today and tomorrow. In addition, a recent study revealed that businesses with more diverse workforces see bottom line benefits: more customers, higher revenues and profits, greater market share, less absenteeism and turnover, and a higher level of commitment to their organization. 13 Government: The lack of access to meaningful job opportunities translates into a higher dependence on government services, such as food stamps, for survival. It is also linked to higher incidences of homelessness, crime, and civil unrest all of which require some level of government intervention. Indeed, studies show that adequate income and opportunity lead to productive participation in society and reduce costs for social and safety services. Hospitals: Emergency rooms serve as the primary health care provider for many of our low-income and impoverished residents, resulting in untold costs. As a recent study revealed, residents of lower socioeconomic status are highly susceptible to diseases, disabilities, and mental health problems. 14 Hospitals often pick up the cost of helping individuals who lack health insurance or government aid. Colleges: With the mission to prepare students for a productive future, colleges have the potential to have an even greater impact in a society that is focusing on reducing inequities in education. By ensuring that all students are prepared for success in college, colleges can focus less on remedial education and more on their core competencies of providing employerdriven training. As the birth home of Martin Luther King, Jr., Atlanta is no stranger to resolving cultural and systemic inequities through dynamic and diverse partnerships. Society At-Large: Societies with large or growing disparities are becoming less economically competitive and less able to meet the human capital and infrastructure needs of the companies and industries they wish to support. In addition, by enabling all of our residents to be productive members of society, we create healthier, more vibrant, and safer communities.

Principles for Economic Inclusion Metropolitan Atlanta must focus its efforts on the development of human and social capital that will build wealth for individuals and families. Towards that end, PSE offers the following principles to guide the development of economic inclusion policies in Atlanta and beyond: Principle 1: Economic inclusion accounts for the financial well-being of families throughout the region. This means deploying people-based strategies that build financial skill and decision-making, creating access to financial products, savings, and assets, and advancing policies that protect consumers. A viable economic development effort must work to strengthen the financial well-being of communities of color throughout the region. Eliminating the racial wealth gap will lead to a stronger economy that will end up benefiting all residents across the income streams. Principle 2: Regional business communities and key decision makers must recognize that low income communities and communities of color are untapped economic assets. In a competitive economy where every person counts, more effectively engaging people living within low income communities and communities of color is the key difference-maker in whether a region will reach its the true potential for economic prosperity for all in the 21st Century. Principle 3: Access to equitable and diverse educational opportunities with appropriate support systems are central components of a successful regional economic development effort. Inclusive approaches to education and appropriate interventions are essential and should begin at the earliest possible age. These measures are key for enabling these individuals to achieve their productive potential for contributing to the society around them. They also help ensure local businesses have the talented and skilled workforce necessary to grow the regional economy. Principle 4: Improved workforce training and soft-skills development for low income communities and communities of color enable these populations to more fully participate in the surrounding economy. Ongoing workforce development that addresses employer needs and trains people for in-demand jobs is needed for individuals to meet the changing needs of employers today and tomorrow. Furthermore, employers, training providers, and workforce intermediaries should be aligned to make sure that the regional training system is efficiently and effectively helping people access available jobs. Principle 5: The leadership, wisdom and innovation found in under-resourced communities must be positioned to inform and benefit from positive market outcomes. Community leadership models are based on the premise that the community knows its environment better than others, and, therefore, residents should be involved and engaged in a leadership role to better effect their own goals and desires. Principle 6: Place-based approaches for economic inclusion, enabled by authentic public-privatecommunity partnerships, will revitalize underdeveloped areas and invigorate metropolitan economies. Stronger local economies are the building blocks for more economically competitive metropolitan regions. Helping individuals in underdeveloped areas participate in the marketplaces and social spaces around them is vital for fostering resilient local economies. Ensuring access to reliable transportation, affordable housing, and quality supportive services (education, child care, health care, and so on) is an imperative.

Will You Join Us? The Growing the Future: The Case for Economic Inclusion in Metropolitan Atlanta report makes the case for a new way forward for our region. It details the situation we face in metro Atlanta, and identifies potential avenues to foster new opportunities for innovation, collaboration, and equity. However, it stops short of prescribing remedies as these will be identified through groundbreaking partnerships to come. In the coming months, PSE and its partners will work to initiate a regional economic inclusion effort that will require the engagement of both common and uncommon allies. We invite you to play your part in moving our region toward Growing the Future - where those at risk for being left behind are welcomed into our marketplaces and social spaces, and enjoy regional assets that have historically been beyond their reach. For more information on PSE, please go to www.partnershipforsoouthernequity.org. Acknowledgments This report was funded by the Annie E. Casey Foundation. We thank them for their support but acknowledge that the findings and conclusions presented in this report are those of the author(s) alone, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Foundation. We also thank our gracious partners who guided and informed this work as members of our editorial committee. Committee members include: Emerson Bryan, Atlanta Regional Commission; Chris Burke, Georgia Institute of Technology; Sameera Fazili, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta; KC George, National Development Council; Chuck Meadows, Atlanta BeltLine Partnership; Don Phoenix, NeighborWorks America; Chris Pumphrey, Douglas County Economic Development Authority; Solana Rice, Corporation for Enterprise Development; Kent Spencer, Invest Atlanta; Tene Traylor, The Kendeda Fund; Jay Tribby, Office of Atlanta City Councilman Kwanza Hall; and Janelle Williams, The Annie E. Casey Foundation. 1. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American FactFinder, 2010-2014. 2. Pooley, Karen, Segregation s New Geography: The Atlanta Metro Region, Race, and the Declining Prospects for Upward Mobility, Southern Spaces, April 15, 2015. 3. MDC, State of the South: Building an Infrastructure of Opportunity for the next generation, October 2014. 4. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, via Neighborhood Nexus, 2010-2014 (population and percent unemployed), 2014 (jobs per square mile). 5. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American FactFinder, 2010-2014 (population and percent of population with no health insurance) and Georgia Department of Education, 2015 (free and reduced price lunch). 6. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Atlanta Area Employment February 2016 (job growth), American Community Survey, 2009-2013 (educational attainment), and Burning Glass Technologies, 2014-2015 (job postings). 7. Liu, Amy, Remaking Economic Development: The Markets and Civics of Continuous Growth and Prosperity, The Brookings Institution, Metropolitan Policy Program, 2016. 8. Hamilton, Darrick and William Darrity, Jr., Anne E. Price, Vishnu Sridharan, and Rebecca Trippett, Umbrellas Don t Make it Rain: Why Studying and Working Hard Isn t Enough for Black Americans, April 2015. 9. Taylor, Paul and Rakesh Kochlar, Richard Fry, Gabriel Velasco, and Seth Motel, Twenty-to-One: Wealth Gaps Rise to Record Highs Between Whites, Blacks and Hispanics, July 26, 2011. 10. Partnership for Southern Equity, One Region, Reality, Future: Metro Atlanta Equity Atlas, November 2013. 11. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, via Neighborhood Nexus, 2010-2014. 12. PolicyLink and the USC Program for Environmental and Regional Equity, Full Employment for All: The Social and Economic Benefits of Race and Gender Equity in Employment, August 2015. 13 Turner, Ani, The Business Case for Racial Equity in Michigan, Altarum Institute and The W.K. Kellogg Foundation, May 2015. 13. Turner, Ani, The Business Case for Racial Equity in Michigan, Altarum Institute and The W.K. Kellogg Foundation, May 2015. 14. United Nations Development Programme, Barriers and Opportunities at the Base of the Pyramid: The Role of the Private Sector in Inclusive Development, August 2014. Eliminating the racial wealth gap will lead to a stronger economy that will end up benefiting all residents across the income streams.

Notes

Notes

For more information, please visit: www.partnershipforsouthernequity.org www.atlantaequityatlas.com. Partnership for Southern Equity TOGETHER WE PROSPER