NUTS AND BOLTS OF FILING A PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IN FEDERAL COURT

Similar documents
PRACTICE ADVISORY. April 21, Prolonged Immigration Detention and Bond Eligibility: Diouf v. Napolitano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION. v. No. XX-XX-XXX PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

Introduction to Federal District Court Litigation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. The above-entitled Court, having received and reviewed:

Immigration Enforcement, Bond, and Removal

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OVERVIEW OF THE DEPORTATION PROCESS

KNOW YOUR RIGHTS FOR IRAQIS WITH REMOVAL ORDERS

The Intersection of Immigration Law with CA State Law

BOND HEARINGS: PRACTICAL ADVICE AND POINTERS. AILA Pro Bono Bond Program

TABLE OF CONTENTS LITIGATING IMMIGRATION CASES IN FEDERAL COURT

REOPENING A CASE FOR THE MENTALLY INCOMPETENT IN LIGHT OF FRANCO- GONZALEZ V. HOLDER 1 (November 2015)

Defending Non-Citizens in Illinois, Indiana, and Wisconsin by Maria Theresa Baldini-Potermin

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. August Term, (Argued: February 18, 2016 Decided: July 29, 2016) Docket No.

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/23/10 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/28/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Exhibit A. Executive Office of Immigration Review (EOIR), Immigration Judge Benchbook (Aug. 2014) (excerpt)

Case 2:13-cv Document 1 Filed 08/01/13 Page 1 of 15

AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAW FOUNDATION

Bond Hearings for Immigrants Subject to Prolonged Immigration Detention in the Ninth Circuit

BIA and Circuit Court Appeals Pro Bono Immigration Training San Francisco, CA August 8, 2013

These materials were originally submitted in conjunction with the program The Basics of Removal Defense held on June 12, 2017.

Case 6:16-cv Document 1 Filed 10/11/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 04/11/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1

What Happens After I Get Out? A Guide for Immigrants Seeking Release From Prolonged Detention at a Bond Hearing Under Rodriguez v. Robbins March 2016

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MEMORANDUM. Sheriffs, Undersheriffs, Jail Administrators. Compliance with federal detainer warrants. Date February 14, 2017

Case 2:12-cv MJP Document 21 Filed 11/14/12 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No Civ (Altonaga/Simonton)

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/27/18 Page 1 of 17

NUTS & BOLTS OF FILING MANDAMUS ACTIONS BEFORE THE U.S. DISTRICT COURTS FOR THE EASTERN AND SOUTHERN DISTRICTS OF NEW YORK

Asylum in the Context of Expedited Removal

: : Defendant. : Defendant Salomon Benzadon Boutin was indicted by a grand jury of the Eastern District

M E M O R A N D U M. Practitioners representing detained immigrant and refugee youth

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARE YOU A UNITED STATES CITIZEN?

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Emergency Rapid Response Materials (Last updated: 5/4/2017)

provide petitioner certain information at 10:00 a.m. on February

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. BIA Nos. A & A

AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAW FOUNDATION

2018 AILA FEDERAL COURT CONFERENCE AND WEBCAST: REMOVAL LITIGATION

Asylum Removal and Immigration Courts: Definitions to Know

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION 2008 kug 25 P 4: 32

TEXAS CRIMINAL DEFENSE FORMS ANNOTATED

SECOND CIRCUIT APPEALS

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Office of the Clerk. After Opening a Case Pro Se Appellants (revised December 2012)

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:17-cv RA Document 1 Filed 04/04/17 Page 1 of 21

REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS UNDER INA 240

The REAL ID Act of 2005 (H.R. 418): Summary and Selected Analysis of Provisions as Passed by the House

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv LTB Document 18 Filed 11/29/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

MOTION FOR RELEASE PENDING HABEAS CORPUS PROCEEDING AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT

Background on the Trump Administration Executive Orders on Immigration

Handout 5.1 Key provisions of international and regional instruments

AFTER TPS: OPTIONS AND NEXT STEPS

Case 3:07-cv WHA Document 17 Filed 10/09/2007 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

n a t i o n a l IMMIGRATION p r o j e c t of the national lawyers guild

INDEX Alphabetization is word-by-word (e.g., R visas precedes REAL ID Act )

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 10/17/18 Page 1 of 10

By Jeffry M. Nichols, Shareholder, Brinks Hofer Gilson & Lione

Criminal Law Table of Contents

M.R IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. Effective January 1, 2013, Illinois Rule of Evidence 502 is adopted, as follows.

3RD CIRCUIT LOCAL APPELLATE RULES Proposed amendments Page 1

ALI-ABA Course of Study Immigration Law: Basics and More

MOTIONS TO REOPEN GUIDE

The NTA: Notice to Appear Kerry Bretz Bretz & Coven

PRACTICE ADVISORY 1 June 15, 2017 ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSURE AND MOTIONS TO RECALENDAR

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Immigration Issues in New Mexico. Rebecca Kitson, Esq

SUBJECT-MATTER INDEX

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Foreword...v Acknowledgments...ix Table of Decisions Index...367

THE LIFE OF AN IMMIGRATION CASE AND WHAT FORM OF PD TO REQUEST AT EACH STAGE. Before Removal Proceedings

AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAW FOUNDATION

DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS IMMIGRATION CONSEQUENCES OF CRIMINAL ACTIVITY, 4TH ED.

(4) Filing Fee: Payment of a $ 5.00 filing is required at the time of filing.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Agency No. A versus

WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO ME?

Pooja Sethi. Wang v. Ashcroft. A. Introduction. B. Parties. 2004] Surveys 351

Kalu Kalu v. Warden Moshannon Valley Correc

Immigration Issues Facing Non- Immigration Courts RAHA JORJANI OFFICE OF THE ALAMEDA COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER

Question & Answer May 27, 2008

The Padilla Rule. Complying with Padilla. STATUTES, CASE LAW, and SECONDARY SOURCES 4/21/2010

. Re: Updates on Hamama v. Adducci, No. 17-cv (E.D. Mich.) and related developments

I-9 Employment Eligibility Verification & Employer Compliance in an Era of Heightened Worksite Enforcement

PRACTICE ADVISORY: PROLONGED MANDATORY DETENTION AND BOND ELIGIBILITY IN THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. Updated: June 2016

THE BASICS: UNDERSTANDING HOW IMMIGRANTS OBTAIN GREEN CARDS General Practice, Solo, and Small Firm Section

Case 2:16-cv MJP Document 22 Filed 05/02/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

CRS Report for Congress

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:18-cv KBF Document 21 Filed 01/17/18 Page 1 of 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

In the United States District Court for the District of Colorado

United States Court of Appeals

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. Agency No. A

Prepared by Public Counsel s Federal Pro Se Clinic

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CHAPTER LOS ANGELES COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION, IMMIGRATION SECTION

Transcription:

NUTS AND BOLTS OF FILING A PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IN FEDERAL COURT February 21, 2018 Raha Jorjani Brad Banias Zachary Nightingale (moderator)

Presented by: AILA Federal Court Litigation Section Provides forum for members to share ideas and information and to receive mentorship and education on litigation-related issues Resources include: sample briefs Seminars quarterly calls on hot topics in federal court litigation Fearless Litigation monthly podcast highlighting cuttingedge litigation strategies http://www.aila.org/membership/communities/sections/fed eral-court

Hosted by: Immigration Justice Campaign Mobilizing lawyers to defend immigrants Teaching cutting-edge strategies to protect rights and challenge deportation machinery Amplifying individual representation through advocacy and litigation Building a movement of lawyers committed to immigration reform www.immigrationjustice.us

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus What type of habeas? What are you challenging? What are you not challenging? Who are you challenging? Where are you challenging? Why are you challenging? What relief are you seeking?

What Type of Habeas? Federal habeas statutes are in 28 USC 2241 2255. Three types of habeas (generally): 28 USC 2241: Conditions or lawfulness of detention 28 USC 2254: Challenging state conviction 28 USC 2255: Challenging federal conviction

What Are You Challenging? - You are challenging ongoing custody or restraint on liberty (unreasonable OSUP). - You are challenging the executive s authority to continue to detain the alien under 28 USC 2241: The writ of habeas corpus shall not extend to a prisoner unless... (3) He is in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States

What Are You NOT Challenging? You are not challenging: The validity of the underlying conviction (if any), see 28 USC 2254, 28 USC 2255; The validity of the underlying removal order or process (if any), see 8 USC 1252; The denial or delay of a benefits petition, the denial or delay of citizenship/naturalization application, or denied entry (if any), see 5 USC 706 (APA), 8 USC 1421(c) (natz denial), 8 USC 1447(b) (natz delay), 8 USC 1503 (N600 or passport denial), Merlan v. Holder, 667 F.3d 538 (5th Cir. 2011) (denial of entry is not custody).

Why Are You Challenging? Unauthorized Detention Prolonged Detention Refusal to provide bond hearing (another way of saying unauthorized or prolonged) Improper Denial of Bond after hearing (usually after BIA review) Certain other illegal aspects of detention

Pre-Filing Considerations Likelihood of success & Exhaustion What success looks like Cost Timeline Client expectations Non-confidentiality EAJA

Where to File General Venue Statute: Venue is proper in the Judicial District where the defendant resides or in the Judicial District in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred. See 28 U.S.C. 1391.

Venue for ICE Detainee Judicial district where individual is being detained (where Warden is located); or Judicial district where the action being challenged took place (e.g. the ICE officer or FOD). **If a noncitizen gets moved during suit, the original court retains jurisdiction over the noncitizen, regardless of where they get moved.**

Find the Rules, Read the Rules, Know the Rules! Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Local Rules for the District Court Individual Judge s Standing Orders Other notices on Court s website? Habeas Rules?

Are You Admitted for Practice? You must be admitted to practice in the specific U.S. District Court where you are filing the Habeas Petition. Requires: Complete Petition for Bar Membership Filing Fee for Attorney Admission Good Standing With State Bar Pro Hac Vice?

Registering for CM/ECF REGISTER FOR PACER REGISTER FOR CM/ECF Register for a PACER Account at: www.pacer.gov Must set up Billing on PACER. Getting registered on CM/ECF can take up to 24 hours. Do NOT leave this for the day you intend to file your AILA Doc. No. 18031299. Habeas! (Posted 3/12/18)

Tips on Electronic Filing All Documents must be turned into PDF. Make sure you have the software you need! (Adobe Acrobat, etc.)

Court Help Desk If you get stuck with electronic filing.

Who To Name As Defendants Custodian of your client, usually ICE, which includes (in their official capacities): Field Office Director (FOD) Assistant Secretary of DHS for ICE Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kelly The Warden of the County Jail or facility where the client is detained Attorney General Jefferson B. Sessions III, (especially if Immigration Court hearing is needed)

What To File Civil Cover Sheet Verified Petition Memorandum of Points & Authorities (optional) Exhibits in Support of Petition Note: Request OSC be issued in 3 days (to avoid need for TRO or emergency motion)

Attaching Evidence/Exhibits Government Does Not Produce Transcript of Underlying Proceedings. Exhibit List will be in the form of an authentication declaration by the attorney Provide sufficient evidence to document the essential claims Follow redaction rules (FRCP and Local Rules) Keep in mind record is publically available

SERVICE Try to contact the local U.S. Attorney s office before filing Courtesy email copy of filing if you are in contact with ASUA After filing habeas, the Court will issue an Order to Show Cause (and/or summons) Serve physical copy of filing, with OSC, on defendants. Note: If DHS or DOJ is defendant, then serve U.S. Attorney s office, which is authorized to receive service for the federal defendants If you name the local warden, you might have to hire a local process server for service File Return of Summons with Court

OKAY, I GOT IT FILED. NOW WHAT? Government attorney will be assigned either from DC or locally; consider reaching out to discuss case; if urgent matter, be ready to act quickly to appear in court

My Filing Was Rejected!

But Act Quickly! Make sure that you have immediate access to phone and email for at least 24-48 hours after filing. Court Clerk often provides instructions for how to cure a defective filing.

Communicating with the U.S. Attorney When you file a Federal Habeas Action, the federal Defendant or Respondent is represented by an Attorney from the U.S. Attorney s office. (aka: AUSA ) An AUSA may call you in order to: Gain Clarification On Remedies You Are Seeking Explore Possible Solutions Or Compromises Narrow Issues Help With Immigration law

Sometimes when you talk to DHS Attorneys, it s like:

But with U.S. Attorneys, it can be a little more like

Step by Step Recap (Part 1) Step 1: Is Habeas the right solution for the problem? Is the client detained by ICE? Is the client improperly being denied a bond hearing? Depending on reason: Is an appeal to the BIA needed? Has the client been given a bond hearing but improperly denied bond? Exhaustion: Is an appeal to the BIA on the merits needed?

Step by Step (Part 2) Identify the courts and parties Who are the defendants? Any strategic decisions? Which court? Any strategic decisions? Am I ready? Discussion with client regarding costs, timing, publicity Preparation in your office to litigate: software, court admissions, personnel, travel

Step by Step (Part 3) Research your legal arguments Circuit Courts (precedent or unpublished) District Court decisions in your district or other districts Consider your judges Prepare your evidence Contact Opposed Counsel (if appropriate) Once your documents are final: E-filing!

After Filing: Then What Happens? You E-file your petition. It will often be referred to the magistrate judge. The magistrate judge will review and issue an order to show cause. USAO and DOJ attorneys will make appearances and file Return. You file your traverse. Argument. Report and Recommendation. Objections Decision

Timing General rule is that Federal Defendant gets 60 days to file a response after being served. 28 U.S.C. 2243 sets default timeline: Return within 3 days unless good cause up to 20 days; and Hearing on case within 5 days of return unless good cause shown

Other Possible Timelines Request an OSC in short time period (e.g. three days), to avoid delay from court Alternatively, if TRO or PI requested, work out reasonable briefing schedule with the AUSA In some cases, Court may request cross-motions for summary judgment if pure legal issues Check Judge s calendar for hearing days

Hypo #1 Pre-Order or Post-Order? Merlin was just ordered removed by an immigration judge. The judge denied his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. He plans on filing an appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals. Is Merlin in pre-order or post-order detention?

Answer Merlin is in pre-order detention Because there is no final order

Hypo #2 Lydia overstayed a tourist visa five years ago. She is arrested for driving without a license and turned over to immigration authorities. She is in immigration detention. She has no other criminal record. ICE refuses to set bond. Can you file habeas to get her out?

Answer Lydia is eligible for a bond hearing before the Immigration Judge You must exhaust that remedy first Cannot file Habeas immediately

Hypo #3 Miriam (Lydia s sister) overstayed a tourist visa five years ago. She is arrested for driving without a license and turned over to immigration authorities. She is in immigration detention. Miriam has a prior conviction for drug possession that makes her deportable. ICE refuses to set a bond, and indicates she is not eligible for bond before the Immigration Court. Can you file habeas?

Answer Miriam is probably eligible for hearing before the Immigration Judge to determine bond eligibility If Immigration Judge finds she is not eligible to request bond, consider whether appeal to the BIA is necessary If BIA appeal futile or would result in unjust prolonged detention, habeas in federal court may be possible

Anticipate Government Arguments Pre-Final Order Cases: Mandatory Detention INA 236(c) Applies Exhaustion to BIA Needed No Review of Discretionary Decisions Statute Does Not Permit Release Post Order Cases: Post-order detention is not yet prolonged Noncitizen has failed to cooperate Noncitizen is particularly dangerous

Discovery Discovery: 28 USC 2246 If affidavits are admitted any party shall have the right to propound written interrogatories to the affiants, or to file answering affidavits.

Consider Relief You are Seeking Legal: Bond hearing? Order of Supervised Release? (Zadvydas/Clark) Immediate release? Practical: Quicker BIA decision? Action on the underlying case? Better terms of OSUP? Quick removal?

CONGRATS! YOUR CLIENT GOT OUT. IS IT OVER? Hint: Hope for the best but prepare for the worst

Post-Release Issues Ask: Did client receive all relief sought in Habeas Petition? Release Order for New Bond Hearing Declaratory Relief EAJA fees (if no waiver) Other?

Challenging AUSA Motion to Dismiss Habeas as Moot Exceptions to Mootness Capable of Repetition Yet Evading Review Voluntary Cessation

What Does Success Look Like? Educating the Court Order Finding Unlawful Government Conduct Transport of Client from Immigration Custody to Criminal Custody to Resolve Criminal Case Bond hearing set before Immigration Court Release of Detained Client

Hypo #4 Robert is charged in criminal case, but is able to post bail before entering a plea. Instead of being released, however, he is transferred to ICE custody. ICE denies bond, and Robert is given a bond hearing before the Immigration Judge. The IJ wants to review the police report, and expects Robert to answer questions about the contents Robert invokes his Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate himself and refuses to answer The IJ denies bond. ICE is not transferring Robert back to criminal custody to resolve the pending charges

Answer Challenge the IJ s denial of bond without providing Robert a chance to return to criminal court to resolve the criminal charges Filing Habeas Can Bring a Recalcitrant ICE to the Table Request Transfer to Criminal Custody if Appropriate

Hypo #5 Abel has no criminal record, but he was previously removed ICE again arrests him and moves to reinstate his prior removal order Abel passes his reasonable fear interview, and is placed in withholding-only proceedings before the IJ Due to IJ s calendar, Abel spends more than six months in ICE custody, and his case remains pending on calendar Habeas?

Answer First, file motion for bond hearing with Immigration Judge, based on prolonged (six month) detention E.g. following Rodriguez in Ninth Circuit If IJ denies, file Habeas Is exhaustion to BIA needed first?

Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) Ask the Judge to Make the Government Pay for Your Work Need Order from the Court in your client s favor Government position not substantially justified Contemporaneous Time Records Standard Rates or Enhanced Reates Clear assignment of fees (agreement with client) Sometimes a stipulated settlement on the case involves a waiver of fees (ultimately client s choice to make)

We Need To Start Challenging ICE & EOIR In Federal Court Don t have to be an expert Civil detention should not the exception, not the rule If it feels unfair, it probably is Help the Article III Judge understand how the immigration system deprives your client of their rights Tell ICE: Hey! B.S.!

THE END Copyright 2018 American Immigration Lawyers Association. All rights reserved.