IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Similar documents
Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/17/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF [COUNTY NAME]

IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION, AKRON

Case 1:17-cv RC Document 8 Filed 09/25/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:19-cv Document 1 Filed 01/09/19 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/24/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. v. Civil Action No.

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/18/17 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case: 2:18-cv ALM-EPD Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/06/18 Page: 1 of 8 PAGEID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/03/17 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/02/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 07/05/18 Page 1 of 5 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Case No.

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/30/18 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/26/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:16-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 10/14/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Attorney for Plaintiff WORLD LOGISTICS SERVICES, INC. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT THE PARTIES

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/26/17 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:14-cv RJJ Doc #26 Filed 06/20/14 Page 1 of 16 Page ID#153

Case4:13-cv JSW Document112 Filed05/05/14 Page1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 07/10/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) )

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS

From Article at GetOutOfDebt.org

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 6:17-cv EFM-GLR Document 1 Filed 12/22/17 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 1:08-cv Document 1 Filed 10/07/2008 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 06/22/18 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Case 1:14-cv RGS Document 1 Filed 09/22/14 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Attorneys for Plaintiff Betty Gregory and the Putative Class UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

INDIVIDUAL, COLLECTIVE, AND CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the putative class.

8:18-cv Doc # 1 Filed: 07/18/18 Page 1 of 12 - Page ID # 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendant.

Case 0:10-cv KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/10/2010 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 09/17/18 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) )

United States Bankruptcy Court. Northern District of California ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:14-cv RB-SMV Document 1 Filed 11/12/14 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/31/17 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv TSC Document 13 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/02/17 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF FRESNO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN JOSEPH BENGIS, an individual,

10/30/2017 7:04 PM 17CV47399 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PARTIES

Case 1:14-cv APM Document 24 Filed 03/10/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case LSS Doc 5 Filed 09/20/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 18 Filed: 02/01/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:365

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:06-cv JLL-CCC Document 55 Filed 03/27/2008 Page 1 of 27

Case 4:17-cv SMR-SBJ Document 1 Filed 06/16/17 Page 1 of 22

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case3:14-cv MEJ Document1 Filed11/24/14 Page1 of 18

rbk Doc#7 Filed 08/13/17 Entered 08/13/17 21:09:47 Main Document Pg 1 of 9

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/21/ :25 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/21/2017 EXHIBIT E

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 03/20/14 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Case No.

Case 5:15-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 07/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 02/24/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Virginia Freedom of Information Act ( VFOIA ) Complaint Template

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN GREEN BAY DIVISION. Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT WILL COUNTY, ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT AT LAW

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 10/27/15 Page 1 of 23 Page ID #:1

[Additional Attorneys on Signature Page]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/08/18 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 4:15-cv RLY-DML Document 1 Filed 07/17/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 0:12-cv RSR Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/18/2012 Page 1 of 15

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/28/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 3:16-cv MAS-DEA Document 1 Filed 11/18/16 Page 1 of 17 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

In the United States District Court For the Middle District of Pennsylvania

Case: 3:17-cv GFVT Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/14/17 Page: 1 of 15 - Page ID#: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NO. COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT INTRODUCTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:16-cv-438 THE HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY

3:18-cv SEM-TSH # 1 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/21/17 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:14-cv SPL Document 25 Filed 09/11/14 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Transcription:

Case 1:17-cv-00450 Document 1 Filed 03/14/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JEFFREY A. LOVITKY Attorney at Law 1776 K Street N.W. Washington D.C. 20006 Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. N.W. Washington D.C. 20500 Defendant COMPLAINT JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. This is a civil action brought to compel compliance by the President with the financial disclosure requirements of the Ethics in Government Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 101 et seq. This action alleges that the financial disclosure report filed by then candidate Donald Trump on May 16, 2016 failed to specifically identify the

Case 1:17-cv-00450 Document 1 Filed 03/14/17 Page 2 of 10 financial liabilities for which he is personally obligated, as required by 5 U.S.C. App. 102(a(4.1 2. Plaintiff practices law in Washington D.C. He is filing this action as a pro se plaintiff. Defendant is President of the United States. Defendant is being sued in his official capacity. 3. This Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1331 (general federal question, 28 U.S.C. 1361 (mandamus, and 28 U.S.C. 2201 (declaratory judgment. Venue lies in this judicial district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(e(1. 4. The Ethics in Government Act mandates public disclosure of the personal financial liabilities of candidates for President and Vice-President of the United States. 5 U.S.C. App. 102(a(4, as incorporated by 5 U.S.C. App. 102(b(1. The statute requires disclosure of such liabilities to any individual who agrees to the restrictions contained in 5 U.S.C. App. 105(c on the use of such information. 5. The purpose of these disclosure requirements is to allow members of the public to make informed judgments as to whether candidates for federal office have financial conflicts of interests that may impair their ability to faithfully execute their duties as public servants. 1 Defendant s Financial Disclosure Report is available from the Wall Street Journal website http://www.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/trumpdisclosuremay2016.pdf (last accessed March 13, 2017. A copy of the report downloaded from the Wall Street Journal website is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. 2

Case 1:17-cv-00450 Document 1 Filed 03/14/17 Page 3 of 10 6. The President s failure to specifically identify the financial liabilities for which he is personally obligated deprived plaintiff of information that plaintiff is entitled by law to receive. This informational injury is itself sufficient to satisfy constitutional standing requirements. 7. Additionally, the President s failure to specifically identify his personal financial liabilities renders more difficult the making of informed judgments as to whether his decisions as President may be impacted by personal financial considerations. This in turn impedes the exercise of plaintiff s right to petition members of Congress and other elected officials for the purpose of redressing any actual or potential conflicts of interests. 8. As noted in Part 8 of the President s financial disclosure statement, various businesses owned by him have incurred debts to nine separate creditors in the amount of at least $300 million dollars. Therefore, it is imperative that plaintiff and other members of the general public fully understand the extent to which the President is personally obligated to pay these business liabilities. 9. On January 23, 2017, plaintiff sent a letter via certified mail to White House Counsel Donald McGahn expressing his concerns pertaining to this matter, and requesting his response thereto. See Exhibit 2. Mr. McGahn has not responded to this letter. 3

Case 1:17-cv-00450 Document 1 Filed 03/14/17 Page 4 of 10 FACTUAL AND LEGAL BACKGROUND 10. Candidates for President and Vice President are required to file their financial disclosure reports with the Federal Election Commission (FEC. 5 U.S.C. App. 103(e. The FEC reviews these reports and sends copies of such reports to the Director of the Office of Government Ethics (OGE for further review. 5 C.F.R. 2634.602(e. The reviewing officials at the FEC and OGE must determine whether the report includes each required item to be completed. 5 C.F.R. 2634.605(b(1(i. Disclosures contained in the report are taken at "face value" as correct, unless there is a patent omission or ambiguity or the official has independent knowledge of matters outside the report. 5 C.F.R. 2634.605(b(2. 11. On May 16, 2016, then candidate Trump certified his financial disclosures as being true, complete and correct. These disclosures were subsequently determined by the appropriate reviewing officials to be in apparent compliance with the public disclosure requirements of the Ethics in Government Act. 12. The May 16, 2016 financial disclosure report is available upon application to members of the public. The application for a copy of such report must state (a the applicant s name, occupation and address; (b the name and address of any other person or organization on whose behalf the copy is requested; and (c that the applicant is aware of the prohibitions on the obtaining or use of the report. 5 U.S.C. App. 105(b(2. 4

Case 1:17-cv-00450 Document 1 Filed 03/14/17 Page 5 of 10 13. On or about December 15, 2016, plaintiff filed an application for a copy of the May 16, 2016 report through the website of the OGE. On December 19, 2016, the OGE sent an email to the plaintiff attaching copies of the May 16, 2016 financial disclosure report.2 14. The Ethics in Government Act requires disclosure of the identity and category of value of any interest in a business entity in excess of $1,000. 5 U.S.C. App. 102(a(3. The Ethics in Government Act also requires disclosure of the identity and category of value of the total liabilities owed to any creditor..which exceed $ 10,000 at any time during the preceding calendar year. 5 U.S.C. App. 102(a(4. 15. Financial disclosure reports are made on the Standard Form (SF 278, or a variation thereof approved by the OGE. The President s disclosure statements were made on an OGE Form 278e. 16. Part 2 of the OGE 278e filed by the President identifies the various business entities in which he has a financial interest, together with a brief description of the primary assets of those entities. Part 2 of the OGE 278(e filed by the President is contained on pages 14 of 58 to pages 30 of 58 of that form. See Exhibit 1. Part 8 of the OGE 278e filed by the President contains a listing of financial liabilities, as 2 A copy of the President s financial disclosure report that was received from the Office of Government Ethics will be filed separately under seal due to possible restrictions on the further re-disclosure of this document. 5

Case 1:17-cv-00450 Document 1 Filed 03/14/17 Page 6 of 10 well as the identity of the creditor and a brief description of the nature and terms of those liabilities. Part 8 of the OGE 278e filed by the President is contained on p. 57 of 58 of Exhibit 1. 17. The Ethics in Government Act and implementing regulations requires disclosure of only those liabilities for which candidates are personally obligated. 5 U.S.C. App. 102(a(4; 5 C.F.R 2634.305(a. The statute and implementing regulations do not require disclosure of liabilities of business entities in which a candidate has a financial interest, unless the candidate is also personally obligated for those liabilities. 18. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Instructions accompanying the SF 278 state that non-recourse liabilities of privately held businesses must be disclosed, unless those liabilities are related to the primary business activity of the entity that incurred the liability. See Instructions, OGE Form 278, pp. 4, 10. 3; see also OGE Public Financial Disclosure Guide FAQs: Liabilities.4 These instructions also require disclosure of the primary business activities of non-public entities, as well as any business activities that are unrelated to that primary activity. See 3 A copy of these instructions may be downloaded from https://www.oge.gov/web/oge.nsf/resources/oge+form+278+instructions (last accessed March 13, 2017. 4 A copy of these FAQs may be retrieved from https://www.oge.gov/web/278eguide.nsf/content/faqs~faqs:+liabilities (last accessed March 13, 2017. 6

Case 1:17-cv-00450 Document 1 Filed 03/14/17 Page 7 of 10 Instructions, p. 4. 19. The President did not disclose any unrelated business activities in Part 2 of his financial disclosure report. Therefore, all of the business liabilities reported in Part 8 of the President s financial disclosure report are related to the primary business activities of the entities disclosed in Part 2. Accordingly, taken at face value, the only business liabilities that were reportable by the President were those for which he was personally obligated. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF 5 U.S.C. APP. 102(A(4 20. The President was required to disclose in Part 8 of the financial disclosure report any liabilities for which he is personally obligated. If the report filed by the President were to be taken at face value, all of the liabilities listed in Part 8 would represent personal obligations of the President. 21. The President is personally obligated for some of the liabilities listed in Part 8 of the disclosure report. 22. Upon information and belief, the President is not personally obligated for all of the liabilities incurred by the various business entities identified in Part 8 of the disclosure report. 23. The financial disclosure report did not segregate the liabilities for which the President is personally obligated from the liabilities for which he is not personally 7

Case 1:17-cv-00450 Document 1 Filed 03/14/17 Page 8 of 10 obligated. This makes it impossible to identify exactly which liabilities represent personal obligations of the President. 24. The President s failure to specifically identify the liabilities for which he is personally obligated violated 5 U.S.C. App. 102(a(4 and 5 C.F.R 2634.305(a. COUNT I (Cause of Action Under 28 U.S.C. 1361 - Mandamus 25. The allegations in Paragraphs 1-24 are incorporated as if fully set forth herein. 26. The President has a non-discretionary duty to specifically identify the liabilities for which he is personally obligated. Plaintiff has a clear right to know exactly which of the liabilities listed in Part 8 of the disclosure statement represent personal obligations of the President. There are no other legal remedies available to plaintiff by which this information can be obtained except through relief in the nature of mandamus. 27. The provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1361 provide a statutory basis for jurisdiction in cases seeking relief in the nature of mandamus against federal officers, including the President of the United States. The provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1361 also provide for an independent cause of action in the absence of any other available remedies. 28. Under common law, mandamus relief was available to compel performance by federal officers of non-discretionary duties. Under common law, mandamus 8

Case 1:17-cv-00450 Document 1 Filed 03/14/17 Page 9 of 10 was also available to compel private individuals to perform a particular act when such act emanates from a clear public duty. The obligation of a candidate for President of the United States to file financial disclosure statements in the manner required by law constitutes such a public duty. 29. The enactment of 28 U.S.C. 1361 did not narrow the scope of this common law cause of action, or otherwise undermine the historic authority of this Court under common law to order relief in the nature of mandamus. 30. Plaintiff is entitled to relief in the nature of mandamus compelling the President to specifically identify in Part 8 of his disclosure report the liabilities for which he is personally obligated. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays: (a For relief in the nature of mandamus directing the President to identify in Part 8 of the disclosure statement the liabilities for which he is personally obligated; (b For a declaratory judgment that the President violated 5 U.S.C. App. 102(a(4 by failing to specifically identify the liabilities for which he is personally obligated; (c (d For the costs of this suit incurred by Plaintiff, and; For such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. 9

Case 1:17-cv-00450 Document 1 Filed 03/14/17 Page 10 of 10 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Jeffrey A. Lovitky D.C. Bar Number 404834 1776 K Street, N.W. Washington D.C. 20036 Tel: (202 429-3393 Fax: (202 318-4013 Email: jefflovitky@gmail.com 10