IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA

Similar documents
TEMPORARY INJUNCTION. upon the Plaintiff, Restoration 1 Franchise Holding, LLC s Motion for Temporary Injunction

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION

ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR. ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 211th LEGISLATURE ADOPTED JUNE 9, 2005

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA - CIVIL DIVISION -

Case 1:10-cv JLT Document 1 Filed 01/22/2010 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR NASSAU COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION. vs. DIVISION: A

Case 2:11-cv Document 1 Filed 11/23/11 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/18/2012 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/18/2012

~/

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR SARASOTA, MANATEE, DESOTO COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case: 4:16-cv DDN Doc. #: 1 Filed: 07/15/16 Page: 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 10/02/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA COMPLAINT

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2002

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR POLK COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF S MOTION TO AMEND AND FOR LEAVE TO ADD CLAIM FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES

Case 1:08-cv FAM Document 52 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/10/2008 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:17-cv JCH-JHR Document 17 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

First Regular Session Sixty-seventh General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED HOUSE SPONSORSHIP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Case No. 8:10-CV T-24 TBM

Case 8:17-cv EAK-JSS Document 114 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID 2433 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION Civil Action No.: 3:17-CV-398.

Barbara Allen v. HealthPort Technologies, LLC, now known as CIOX Technologies, LLC, Fla. 13 th Jud. Cir. Ct. Case No. 12-CA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, File No. 1:15-CV-31 OPINION AND ORDER

Assurance of Discontinuance ("AOD") pursuant to RCW I. PARTIES

COHASSET RULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES

Your Legal Rights and Options in this Lawsuit:

A. WHEREAS, Licensor owns the rights to the Lit by Lumileds badge ( Lumileds Badge );

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. CASE NO.: CA XXXX-)a FINAL JUDGMENT

EEOC v. Dillard's, Inc

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Filing # E-Filed 05/08/ :47:12 PM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA

Filing # E-Filed 04/10/ :26:28 AM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT NO.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH CQUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION C 0 M P L A I N T

Case 2:12-cv JCM-VCF Document 1 Filed 11/13/12 Page 1 of 10

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. COMPLAINT and Jury Demand

INDEPENDENT SALES AGENCY TERMS AND CONDITIONS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT (Jury Trial Demanded)

CITY OF ALAMOSA PROCEDURE FOR NEW LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION PROCESSING INTRODUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES

Case 2:14-cv JTF-dkv Document 20 Filed 05/07/14 Page 1 of 15 PageID 182

1. If you have not already done so, please join the conference call.

STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNT' SUPERIOR COURT r? NO. 5 5Z - 4 5LA. 1. t3 t 2- r b I i tala' 5. L_ L-C- QUIZ HOLDINGS, LLC ASSURANCE OF DISCONTINUANCE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CEDAR RAPIDS DIVISION. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case: 2:17-cv MHW-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/23/17 Page: 1 of 15 PAGEID #: 1

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/24/ :27 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/24/2015 EXHIBIT C

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case: 4:14-cv AGF Doc. #: 49 Filed: 04/03/15 Page: 1 of 49 PageID #: 637

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION

Filing # E-Filed 08/28/ :22:03 PM

2018 LEGISLATIVE REPORT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE LOCHIRCO FRUIT AND PRODUCE COMPANY, INC., and THE HAPPY APPLE COMPANY,

OPENPOWER TRADEMARK LICENSE AGREEMENT

Filing # E-Filed 02/03/ :01:59 PM

Case 8:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:1

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PASCO COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION. Plaintiff, CASE NO.: CA-2912-WS/G

Case 0:16-cv WPD Document 101 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/24/2017 Page 1 of 12

City of La Palma Agenda Item No. 6

This cause having come on to be heard upon the above-referenced Motions seeking

CTAS e-li. Published on e-li ( November 20, 2018 Prohibited Acts

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FINAL JUDGMENT. THIS MATTER, having come before the Court for Trial on May 31, 2017, June 1, 2017

INDEPENDENT SALES ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case 2:12-cv JFC Document 1 Filed 05/07/12 Page 1 of 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

NON-EXCLUSIVE LICENSE FOR USE OF SCHOOL WORDMARKS AND LOGOS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

JMM Consulting, LLC v Triumph Constr. Corp NY Slip Op 30726(U) April 12, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2016 Judge:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Plaintiff, N01. Defendants.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No. 3:12-cv-686

on,~3p TIN STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT NO, The State of Washington, by and through its attorneys, Robert W. Ferguson, Attorney

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 27 Filed: 10/02/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:752

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 24 Filed: 05/16/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:499

PROVISIONS JAMBA JUICE COMPANY'S ASSURANCE OF 14 DISCONTINUANCE. Assurance of Discontinuance ("AOD") pursuant RCW

Case 1:09-cv KMM Document 102 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/27/2010 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

DISTRIBUTION CONTRACTS Outline by Andre R. Jaglom*

Case 1:10-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/05/10 Page 1 of 20

Transcription:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA WORLD OF BEER FRANCHISING, INC., a Florida corporation, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2017-CA-000874 Division: L SRQBEER USK LLC, a Florida limited liability company; J DUBS BREWING COMPANY, LLC, a Florida limited liability company; DEAN LAMBERT, an individual; and MARK BRODERICK, an individual, Defendants. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY INJUNCTION This cause is before the Court on Plaintiff s Emergency Amended Ex Parte Motion for Temporary Injunction. The Court, having previously issued an ex parte temporary injunction on January 31, 2017, having reviewed the Motion and now heard argument from the parties, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: (a) The Plaintiff, World of Beer Franchising, Inc. ("WOBF") is a franchisor of retail alcohol establishments that feature and sell imported and domestic beers, tavern fare, and other authorized products in a distinctive pub environment. (b) The Defendant, SRQBEER USK, LLC ("SRQBEER") was a World of Beer franchisee that operated a tavern located at 8217 Tourist Center Drive, Bradenton, Florida 34201 (the Tavern ) under a 2009 franchise agreement with WOBF (the Franchise Agreement ). SRQBEER was assigned the Franchise Agreement from another WOBF franchisee in 2012. (c) The Defendant, Mark Broderick, and the Defendant, Dean Lambert, are the 02/20/2017 04:04:07 PM Electronically Filed: Hillsborough County/13th Judicial Circuit. Page 1

managers of SRQBEER (collectively, the "Defendants"). (d) Under the Franchise Agreement, SRQBEER agreed to certain post-termination obligations such as to provide WOBF, upon written notice from WOBF within 60 days from the date of termination, the right to purchase the Tavern, as well as, for a period of two years, not to have any direct or indirect interest as a disclosed or beneficial owner in any competitive business, perform any service for any competitive business, recruit or hire any person who is a WOBF employee (or employee of any WOBF Franchisee), or divert or attempt to divert any business or customers to a competitive business. (e) On January 15, 2017, SRQBEER entered into an Intent to Enter Licensing Agreement with JDubs Brewing Company, LLC ("JDubs"), under which SRQBEER agreed to operate a tap room called the Dub Shack at UTC, using JDub's trademarks at the former World of Beer Tavern. (f) On January 19, 2017, SRQBEER notified WOBF of its intent to close the Tavern, and on January 20, 2017, it closed the Tavern. (g) On January 25, 2017, because the Defendants failed to actively operate the Tavern as required under the Franchise Agreement, WOBF terminated the Franchise Agreement. (h) On January 27, 2017, Defendants opened the Dub Shack at UTC to the public at the former Tavern location (i) WOBF subsequently brought the subject motion for temporary injunction, requesting the Court enjoin Defendants from operating a competing business and from transferring their interests in the Tavern in violation of WOBF's contractual right of first refusal. (j) On February 10, 2017, WOBF and the Defendants appeared before the Court on WOBF's motion for temporary injunction. 2 02/20/2017 04:04:07 PM Electronically Filed: Hillsborough County/13th Judicial Circuit. Page 2

(k) After termination and before opening the Dub Shack, Defendants did not provide WOBF an opportunity to purchase Defendants' interests in the Tavern. (l) Defendants' operation of the Dub Shack is violating Defendants' covenant not to compete. (m) WOBF is substantially likely to succeed on the merits of its breach of contract claims. (n) (o) WOBF is being irreparably harmed by Defendants' actions. WOBF has legitimate business interests in protecting its confidential business information, its brand, and its goodwill, all of which are harmed by a former franchisee operating a competing business in place of the franchised business. (p) WOBF's legitimate business interests justify enforcement of the covenant not to compete. (q) (r) The covenant not to compete is reasonable in scope. Under Florida law, the violation of an enforceable restrictive covenant creates a presumption of irreparable injury. See Fla. Stat. 542.335(1)(j). (s) The evidence presented by SRQBEER failed to rebut the presumption of irreparable harm to WOBF. (t) WOBF lacks an adequate legal remedy. Monetary damages would be difficult, if not impossible to calculate under the circumstances. (u) (v) The balance of harms supports an injunction. An injunction serves the clear public interest of enforcing the parties contractual obligations, preventing customer confusion and the erosion of goodwill, and enforcing a reasonable covenant not to compete. 3 02/20/2017 04:04:07 PM Electronically Filed: Hillsborough County/13th Judicial Circuit. Page 3

(w) WOBF shall post a bond in the amount of $50,000 to secure the adverse party for costs and damages if the fact finder ultimately concludes that the injunction was improperly entered. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT: 1. Plaintiff s Motion for Temporary Injunction, dated January 30, 2017, is hereby GRANTED, as follows: 2. SRQBEER, Mr. Lambert, and Mr. Broderick are further enjoined, from entry of this Order through March 26, 2017, from transferring to any third party any of their interests in the Tavern, including their leasehold interests, to allow WOBF sixty (60) days from termination to evaluate whether it will exercise its right of first refusal under the Franchise Agreement. 3. Beginning on March 27, 2017 and until further order of this Court, the Defendants, their agents, servants, and employees, and those people in active concert or participation with them are hereby enjoined from: (b) having any direct or indirect interest or performing any service for any competitive business 1 located or operating in the Non-Compete Area (defined as the geographic area located (i) within the Protected Territory (5-mile radius of 8217 Tourist Center Drive, Bradenton, Florida 34201); (ii) within a 10-mile radius of 8217 Tourist Center Drive, Bradenton, Florida 34201; and (iii) within a 10-mile radius of any WOB Store in operation or under construction on or before January 25, 2017); 2 (c) recruiting or hiring any person who is a WOBF employee or the employee of any World of Beer establishment owned by WOBF, its affiliates, or its franchisees without obtaining the prior written permission of that person's employer; and 1 Competitive Business is defined as any business or facility owning, operating or managing, or granting franchises or licenses to others to do so, any bar, pub, tavern or other alcoholic beverage service facility or any retail establishment (like a liquor store or convenience store) featuring beer, wine and related products as a primary menu item, other than a World of Beer Store operated under a franchise agreement with WOBF. 2 This Order does not prohibit Defendants or their owners from having a direct or indirect interest as a disclosed or beneficial owner in a publicly held Competitive Business, as long as such securities represent less than 5% of the number of shares of that class of securities which are issued and outstanding. 4 02/20/2017 04:04:07 PM Electronically Filed: Hillsborough County/13th Judicial Circuit. Page 4

(d) diverting or attempting to divert any business or customer of a World of Beer establishment to any Competitive Business or otherwise taking any action injurious or prejudicial to the goodwill associated with WOB's marks or System. DONE AND ORDERED in Hillsborough County, Florida, this day of, 2017. 17-CA-000874 2/20/2017 4:03:58 PM Conformed copies to: Michael Schuchat, Esq. RIDDELL LAW GROUP Suntrust Bank Building 3400 South Tamiami Trial Suite 202 Sarasota, Florida 34239 mschuchat@rlglawfirm.com criddel@rlglawfirm.com Counsel for Defendants SRQBEER, Broderick, and Lambert STEVEN SCOTT STEPHENS Circuit Court Judge S. Douglas Knox, Esq. Charlotte E. Murrell, Esq. QUARLES & BRADY 101 E. Kennedy Blvd. Suite 3400 Tampa, Florida 33602 Doug.Knox@quarles.com Charlotte.murrell@quarles.cim Attorneys for Plaintiff Tommy Gregory, Esq. WILLIAMS PARKER 200 S. Orange Ave. Sarasota, Florida 34236 tgregory@williamsparker.com Counsel for JDubs Brewing Company 5 02/20/2017 04:04:07 PM Electronically Filed: Hillsborough County/13th Judicial Circuit. Page 5