Volume 7. Sandra M. Halsey, CSR, Official Court Reporter 1

Similar documents
Volume 6. Sandra M. Halsey, CSR, Official Court Reporter 449

Verdict on Punishment

Defense Motion for Mistrial

Arenda Langford (not permitted to testify)

Testimony of Lloyd Harrell

Affidavit of Susan Simmons

Criminal Law Table of Contents

STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ) SS.

1 IN RE: PEOPLE VS. ANNABEL MELONGO SGJ# APR 2241 ARR. DATE BEFORE THE SPECIAL GRAND JURY OF COOK COUNTY 7 APRIL 2010

TEXAS CRIMINAL DEFENSE FORMS ANNOTATED

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT-CRIMINAL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, ARRAIGNMENT AND PLEA HEARING Monday, January 26, 2009

HAHN & BOWERSOCK FAX KALMUS DRIVE, SUITE L1 COSTA MESA, CA 92626

acquittal: Judgment that a criminal defendant has not been proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Criminal Litigation: Step-By-Step

DEKALB COUNTY, ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) HONORABLE WILLIAM BRADY, on the 12th of April, MS. AISHA DAVIS, for the defendant.

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

NOTE WELL: See provisions pertaining to convening an investigative grand jury noted in N.C. Gen. Stat. 15A-622(h).

Courtroom Terminology

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE Commission

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS TRANSCRIPT OF SENTENCING HEARING BEFORE THE HONORABLE CARLOS MURGUIA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Overview of Pretrial & Trial Procedure. Basic Concepts. What is Proof (Evidence) David Hamilton City Attorney Reno & Honey Grove Tx.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT - CRIMINAL DIVISION

1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA 2 CASE NO.: CACE

An Introduction. to the. Federal Public Defender s Office. for the Districts of. South Dakota and North Dakota

Fall, Criminal Litigation 9/4/17. Criminal Litigation: Arraignment to Appeal. How Do We Get A Case?

EVIDENCE, FOUNDATIONS AND OBJECTIONS. Laurie Vahey, Esq.

Victim / Witness Handbook. Table of Contents

08/16/2013 Order Event ID: THE COURT ENTERS ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SPECIFIC DISCOVERY --

Criminal Litigation: Step-By-Step

JOSEPH M. LATONA, ESQ. 716 BRISBANE BUILDING 403 MAIN STREET BUFFALO, NEW YORK (716)

Felony Cases. Police Investigation. Associate Circuit Court. Felony Versus Misdemeanor

American Criminal Law and Procedure Vocabulary

1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH PLAINTIFF, JURY TRIAL TRIAL - DAY 26 5 vs. Case No.

Case 2:12-cv WCO Document 16-3 Filed 04/06/13 Page 1 of 25. Exhibit C

FAQ: Preparing, Presenting, and Closing a Case

STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CRIME VICTIMS BILL OF RIGHTS REQUEST TO EXERCISE VICTIMS RIGHTS

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT MERCER COUNTY APPELLANT, CASE NO

CAUSE NO. THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF [INSERT PROPERTY] JUDICIAL DISTRICT

CAUSE NUMBER 00 THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE COUNTY CRIMINAL V. COURT AT LAW NUMBER 00 DEFENDANT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH PLAINTIFF, ARRAIGNMENT & MOTIONS. 5 vs. Case No. 05 CF 381

INFORMATION ON APPLICATIONS FOR EXECUTIVE CLEMENCY (PARDONS, COMMUTATIONS, ETC.)

Transcript of Jones v Scruggs Sanctions Hearing (SF FCA) (2).TXT 5 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LAFAYETTE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI 13 JONES, FUNDERBURG,

ALABAMA VICTIMS RIGHTS LAWS1

Directions: Read each of the questions or statements below, then choose the correct answer from those provided.

Ricardo Gonzalez vs. State of Florida

1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH PLAINTIFF, JURY TRIAL TRIAL - DAY 25 5 vs. Case No.

1 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 2 FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA 3 DEPARTMENT 9 HON. DENISE MOTTER, COMMISSIONER 4 5 CHRISTINE SONTAG, )

09/27/2013 Motion Event ID: MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FILED BY THE OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL STD /30/2013 /REB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE CRIMINAL COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ) CASE NO.: 2013-C Defendant. ) TRANSCRIPT OF THE EVIDENCE

Judges and the Media. College for New Judges National Center for Juvenile and Family Court Judges

UNIFORM APPLICATION FOR POST-CONVICTION RELIEF

Follow the instructions in each section carefully. Please ensure that your responses are legible.

Court Records Glossary

JUROR INSTRUCTIONS ALONG W/ QUESTIONS & ANSWERS FOR POTENTIAL JURORS

Case 5:08-cr DNH Document 24 Filed 07/16/09 Page 1 of 29

Title 15: COURT PROCEDURE -- CRIMINAL

5 Plaintiff, 6 Vs. 7 WILLIAM DAVISON, 8 Defendant. 9 / 13 * * * * * * * * 14 DEPOSITION OF MARLIN KNAPP 15 TAKEN AT THE INSTANCE OF THE DEFENDANT

5 Plaintiff, 6 Vs. 7 WILLIAM DAVISON, 8 Defendant. 9 / 13 * * * * * * * * 14 DEPOSITION OF MARLIN KNAPP 15 TAKEN AT THE INSTANCE OF THE DEFENDANT

2 JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, et al., ) ) 3 Respondents, ) ) 4 vs. ) No. SC ) 5 STATE OF MISSOURI, et al., ) ) 6 Appellants. )

MOCK EXAMINATION TRANSCRIPT ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE. - and - DEFENDANT * * * * * * * * * *

The court process CONSUMER GUIDE. How the criminal justice system works. FROM ATTORNEY GENERAL JEREMIAH W. (JAY) NIXON

JURY INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE VOIR DIRE EXAMINATION-CRIMINAL

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER (JURY TRIAL) for Plaintiff.

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs February 4, 2004

PREPARING FOR TRIAL. 3. Opponent s experts identified, complete Rule 26 responses received and, if possible and necessary, experts have been deposed.

PERSONS IN CUSTODY. Prison Number Case No.: (To be supplied by the Clerk of the District Court) INSTRUCTIONS--READ CAREFULLY

DEPOSITION OF KRISTA HIGGS BY BRIAN KORTE ESQ

Exceptional Reporting Services, Inc. P.O. Box Corpus Christi, TX

UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRE-TRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

People v Murray 2013 NY Slip Op 34063(U) March 8, 2013 Supreme Court, Westchester County Docket Number: Judge: Barbara G.

UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRETRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

STUDENT STUDY GUIDE CHAPTER SEVEN

POLICY AND PROGRAM REPORT

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA

OUTLINE OF CRIMINAL COURT PROCESS

1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH 1 2

CASE NUMBER: DIV 71. It appearing that this case is at issue and can be set for trial, it is ORDERED as follows:

PRESENT: Carrico, C.J., Lacy, Hassell, Keenan, Koontz, and Kinser, JJ., and Stephenson, S.J.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF RANKIN COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI

APPENDIX A. FORM PETITION READ THESE INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE PREPARING THE PETITION

Judicial Assistant s > ALWAYS copy opposing counsel(s) on correspondence to the Court

HANDBOOK FOR VICTIMS/WITNESSES OF VIOLENT CRIMES

Case 1:04-cv JJF Document Filed 03/19/2008 Page 1 of 7 EXHIBIT A

Religious Beliefs, Motion for Voir Dire on Sentence Length, and Motion for Voir

ORDER ON ARRAIGNMENT

STATE BAR OF TEXAS. PERFORMANCE GUIDELINES For NON-CAPITAL CRIMINAL DEFENSE REPRESENTATION

PART XV: Local Trials and Appeals; Internal Appeals Procedures; Reinstatement Procedure; and Member Discipline

FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR INVOLUNTARY COMMITMENT OF SEXUALLY VIOLENT PREDATORS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TRIAL COURT CAUSE NOS & REPORTER'S RECORD VOLUME 1 OF 1 ) IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF )

HANDBOOK FOR TRIAL JURORS SERVING IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS

Dodge County. 1) Rules of Decorum. (Sixth Judicial District)

STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT DANE COUNTY Branch 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. Case No. PRETRIAL AND CRIMINAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA-1783 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

Case 1:12-cr JTN Doc #220 Filed 04/04/13 Page 1 of 20 Page ID#1769. Plaintiff,

The Florida Bar v. Bruce Edward Committe

Transcription:

Volume 7 1 2 IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 3 3 DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS 4 5 6 7 THE STATE OF TEXAS } 8 VS: } NO. F-96-39972-J 9 DARLIE LYNN ROUTIER } & F-96-39973-J 10 11 12 13 14 STATEMENT OF FACTS 15 PRETRIAL MOTIONS HEARING 17 VOL. 7 OF 53 VOLS. 18 September 12, 1996 19 Thursday 20 21 22 23 24 Sandra M. Halsey, CSR, Official Court Reporter 1 1 2 C A P T I O N 3 4 5 BE IT REMEMBERED THAT, on Thursday, the 12th day of 6 September, 1996, in the Criminal District Court Number 3 7 of Dallas County, Texas, the above-styled cause came on 8 for a hearing before the Hon. Mark Tolle, Judge of the 9 Criminal District Court No. 3, of Dallas County, Texas, 10 without a jury, and the proceedings were held, in open 11 court, as follows: 12 13 14 15 17 18 19 20

21 22 23 24 Sandra M. Halsey, CSR, Official Court Reporter 2 1 A P P E A R A N C E S 2 3 4 HON. JOHN VANCE, 5 Criminal District Attorney 6 Dallas County, Texas 7 8 BY: HON. GREG DAVIS 9 Assistant District Attorney 10 Dallas County, Texas 11 12 AND: 13 HON. JOHN GRAU 14 Assistant District Attorney 15 Dallas County, Texas 17 AND: 18 HON. SHERRI WALLACE 19 Assistant District Attorney 20 Dallas County, Texas 21 22 APPEARING FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS 23 24 Sandra M. Halsey, CSR, Official Court Reporter 3 1 2 ADDITIONAL APPEARANCES: 3 4 HON. DOUGLAS PARKS 5 Attorney at Law 6 Dallas County, Texas 7 8 AND: 9 HON. WAYNE HUFF 10 Attorney at Law 11 Dallas County, Texas 12 13 Appearing for the Defendant 14 For the purpose of the trial

15 AND: 17 HON. BLAKE WITHROW 18 Attorney at Law 19 Dallas County, Texas 20 21 APPEARING FOR THE DEFENDANT 22 for the purpose of the appeal 23 24 Sandra M. Halsey, CSR, Official Court Reporter 4 1 P R O C E E D I N G S 2 3 September 12th, 1996 4 Thursday 5 9:30 a.m. 6 7 (Whereupon, the following 8 proceedings were held in 9 Open court, in the presence 10 And hearing of the 11 Defendant, being 12 represented by her attorneys 13 and the representatives of 14 The State of Texas, but 15 without the presence of a jury, as follows:) 17 18 19 20 THE COURT: All right. Cause 21 F-96-39972 and 73 styled the State of Texas versus Darlie 22 Lynn Routier. Let the record reflect that all parties in 23 the trial are present and during these proceedings today 24 the State will be represented by Mr. Greg Davis as lead counsel and the defense by Mr. Douglas Parks as the lead Sandra M. Halsey, CSR, Official Court Reporter 5 1 counsel. 2 This is a Pre-trial hearing, the Court 3 has reviewed all motions filed. The following motions are 4 granted: The motion to compel the disclosure of the 5 district attorney's jury selection data, that is granted 6 as to prospective jurors. The Defendant's request for 7 notice of State's intention to introduce evidence of other 8 crimes, wrongs or acts, pursuant to Texas Rules of

9 Criminal Evidence, 4.04-B, while that should be directed 10 to the State and not the Court and there is no need for 11 the Court to rule on it. The Court will grant that. 12 Motion for inventory of items taken at 13 the crime scenes, that is granted. Motion in Limine as 14 regards to photographs, that is granted. Motion to 15 require the State to reveal any agreement entered into between the State and any prosecution witness that could 17 conceivably influence their testimony, that is granted. 18 Defendant's motion requesting notice of 19 the prosecution's intent to use certified copies of 20 official written instruments, that is granted. 21 Motion for leave to file additional 22 motions, that is granted. 23 Now, we have the motion -- the Omnibus 24 Pre-trial motion. And I am going to go down this by paragraphs: Paragraph Roman Numeral 1, granted; Paragraph Sandra M. Halsey, CSR, Official Court Reporter 6 1 Roman Numeral 2, granted; Paragraph Roman Numeral 3, 2 granted; Paragraph Roman Numeral 4, is covered by the 3 discovery motion; Paragraph Roman Numeral 5, is granted as 4 to the case in chief witnesses; Paragraph Roman Numeral 6, 5 is granted; Paragraph Roman Numeral 7, is granted; 6 Paragraph Roman Numeral 8, is granted; Paragraph Roman 7 Numeral 9, is granted; Paragraph Roman Numeral 10, is 8 granted, if the State calls the Grand Jury witness; 9 Paragraph Roman Numeral 11, is granted. As regards to 10 Paragraph Roman Numeral 10, of course, the Court will 11 review in camera any impeaching or inconsistent 12 statements. Paragraph Roman Numeral 11, is granted; 13 Paragraph Roman Numeral 12, is granted, it's already 14 covered in other motions, as is Paragraph Roman Numeral 15 13, which I will grant. Paragraph Roman Numeral 14, is denied 17 at this time and the Court will consider that if any other 18 motions are filed. 19 Now we have the discovery motion. The 20 following paragraphs and requests in that motion are 21 granted: Paragraph 1, 2, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,, 17, 22 18, 20, 21,, 26, 27, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 23 37-A, 37-C, 37-D and 37-E. 24 Paragraph 4 is granted as to preserving any such notes. Paragraph 8 is granted as to anything Sandra M. Halsey, CSR, Official Court Reporter 7 1 exculpatory. Paragraph 15 is granted as to anything 2 exculpatory. Paragraph 28 is granted as to any reports

3 based on the examination of the defendant. 4 The following paragraphs are denied: 5 3, 5, 19, 23, 24, 37-B, 37-F, 37-G, 37-H, 37-I, 37-J and 6 38. Paragraph 6 is denied except as to anything 7 exculpatory. Paragraph 9 is denied at this time, but the 8 State is ordered to have transcripts available at the time 9 of the trial. And Paragraph 22 is denied as to any 10 reports of State's experts, but granted as to any prints 11 and the results of any tests. 12 Now, we have the following motions 13 which will be held in abeyance at this time. The 14 defendant's written objection to admissibility of 15 extraneous offenses, we will rule on those at the appropriate time during trial. 17 The defendant's special requested 18 Charge number 1 at the punishment phase of the trial. The 19 Court will rule on that when we get to that phase of the 20 trial. The State's motion in limine -- well, these were 21 filed -- we should have ruled on these first. The State's 22 motions in limine are granted. We will have a hearing 23 should that be necessary. 24 And the motion requesting the defendant's intent to use certified copies, I'll grant Sandra M. Halsey, CSR, Official Court Reporter 8 1 that motion, but the State has those copies, but we will 2 go ahead and grant that. 3 Now the following motions are denied: 4 The motion in limine as regard to the punishment argument, 5 that is denied. 6 The motions to determine the 7 constitutionality of Sections 37.071 the parties charge, 8 that is denied. The motion to exclude evidence of 9 unadjudicated extraneous offenses during the punishment 10 phase, that is denied. The motion to hold 11 unconstitutional Vernon's Annotated Code of Criminal 12 Procedure, Article 37.071, Sections 2-E and F as regard to 13 failure to require mitigation, that is denied. 14 Motion to voir dire on the parole law 15 of the 40 year minimum, that is denied. Motion to declare the Texas capital sentencing scheme unconstitutional, and 17 motion to preclude imposition of the death penalty, that 18 is denied. 19 Motion to hold unconstitutional 20 Vernon's Annotated Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 21 37.071, Sections 2-E and F, as regards to the burden of 22 proof, that is denied. 23 Second motion to set aside the 24 indictment as regards to the unconstitutionality of the

statute, that is denied. Sandra M. Halsey, CSR, Official Court Reporter 9 1 Motion to suppress will be held in 2 abeyance, we will rule on that at the appropriate time. 3 Motion to present evidence of parole 4 eligibility is denied. Defendant's motion requesting 5 notice of the State's intent to impeach witnesses by 6 evidence of a crime, at this time -- well, I will hold 7 that one a minute. 8 The first amended motion to record the 9 trial of this cause by video or audio recording is denied. 10 Now, getting back to the defendant's 11 motion requesting notice of the State's intent to impeach 12 witness or witnesses with evidence of the crime, this 13 should be presented to the State, but the Court will 14 accept it and will grant the motion, and the State is 15 required to give written notice upon request. We now come to the -- well, so far, any 17 objections to any of the rulings of the Court? 18 MR. GREG DAVIS: No, your Honor. 19 THE COURT: Mr. Parks? 20 MR. DOUGLAS PARKS: Of course, we 21 except to the Court's ruling with respect to those motions 22 that were denied, your Honor. 23 THE COURT: Well, I understand that. 24 We now have the motion for change of venue, the Court has reviewed this motion in it's Sandra M. Halsey, CSR, Official Court Reporter 10 1 entirety. Does either side have anything further with 2 regards to that motion? 3 MR. GREG DAVIS: The State has nothing 4 further. 5 MR. DOUGLAS PARKS: No, your Honor. 6 THE COURT: The Court having reviewed 7 the motion, grants the motion and the -- will it be 8 acceptable, if the -- as regards to where the case will be 9 moved, neither side will require it to be moved -- or 10 neither side will object if it's moved to a district 11 beyond the adjoining districts; is that correct? 12 MR. GREG DAVIS: That's correct, your 13 Honor. 14 MR. DOUGLAS PARKS: That's correct, 15 your Honor. THE COURT: The districts adjoining 17 Dallas County. In other words, any county in Texas will 18 be acceptable to the State; is that right?

19 MR. GREG DAVIS: Yes, sir, your Honor. 20 THE COURT: And the defense? 21 MR. DOUGLAS PARKS: Yes, your Honor. 22 THE COURT: All right. In as much as 23 one of these -- in the Pre-trial motion it was asked that 24 Mrs. Routier be arraigned outside of the presence of the jury, the Court will now do that. Sandra M. Halsey, CSR, Official Court Reporter 11 1 Mrs. Routier, in each one of these 2 cases, you are charged with capital murder, that is a 3 capital felony. The penalty range is death, or life 4 confinement in the state penitentiary, depending upon the 5 findings of the jury. Do you understand what you are 6 charged with in each case, and the penalty ranges? 7 THE DEFENDANT: Yes, sir. 8 THE COURT: Thank you. 9 All right, anything else at this time? 10 MR. GREG DAVIS: No, your Honor. 11 MR. DOUGLAS PARKS: No, sir. 12 THE COURT: All right. Thank you. 13 MR. GREG DAVIS: Thank you. 14 MR. DOUGLAS PARKS: Thank you. 15 THE COURT: We will see you. Hearing is over. 17 MR. GREG DAVIS: Yes, sir. 18 MR. DOUGLAS PARKS: Yes, sir. 19 THE COURT: The Court will now resume 20 it's regular docket. 21 THE COURT: All right. 22 23 (Whereupon, this 24 Concluded the Pre-trial motions Sandra M. Halsey, CSR, Official Court Reporter 12 1 Hearing held, 2 In this cause, 3 On this date.) 4 5 6 THE COURT: All right. Let's go back 7 on the record in the Routier case. 8 MR. GREG DAVIS: If you were subpoenaed 9 by the State for today, please, come forward and be sworn. 10 THE COURT: Come on up. Anybody who 11 has been subpoenaed by the State today, come on up here 12 and get sworn in.

13 MR. GREG DAVIS: Judge, we had some 14 witnesses that we brought in to be sworn in today for this 15 hearing. Could we get those witnesses sworn in? THE COURT: Yes, sure. 17 All right. If all of you ladies and 18 gentlemen will raise your right hands, please. 19 THE WITNESSES: There is one more. 20 THE COURT: One more. All right. 21 Okay. Get everybody up here. 22 MR. GREG DAVIS: We have got another 23 one. 24 THE COURT: That's all right. MR. GREG DAVIS: I think there is one Sandra M. Halsey, CSR, Official Court Reporter 13 1 more. 2 THE COURT: While we are waiting for 3 one more, let's go on the record, and the following people 4 are going to be sworn in today. If you will just state 5 your names slowly and you might spell your last name for 6 Ms. Halsey. 7 THE WITNESS: Melanie Waits, W-A-I-T-S. 8 THE WITNESS: Julie Clark, C-L-A-R-K. 9 THE WITNESS: Kevin Laredo, 10 L-A-R-E-D-O. 11 THE WITNESS: Darlie Kee, K-E-E. 12 THE WITNESS: Darin Routier, 13 R-O-U-T-I-E-R. 14 THE WITNESS: Dana Stahl, S-T-A-H-L. 15 THE COURT: What was your first name? THE WITNESS: Dana. 17 THE COURT: Dana? 18 THE COURT REPORTER: Is it D-A-N-A or 19 D-A-N-N-A? 20 THE WITNESS: D-A-N-A, S-T-A-H-L. 21 THE COURT: And your name, ma'am, right 22 here in front. 23 THE WITNESS: Tammy Jovell, 24 J-O-V-E-L-L. THE COURT REPORTER: What was your Sandra M. Halsey, CSR, Official Court Reporter 14 1 first name? 2 THE WITNESS: Tammy. 3 THE COURT: With an I or a Y? 4 THE WITNESS: Y. 5 THE COURT: Okay. 6 THE WITNESS: Barbara Jovell,

7 J-O-V-E-L-L. 8 THE WITNESS: Kenneth Waits, W-A-I-T-S. 9 THE WITNESS: Kenneth Stahl, S-T-A-H-L. 10 THE COURT: All right. Are we still 11 waiting for somebody? 12 Well, here is what we will do is, we 13 will just swear this group in right now. 14 Will you ladies and gentlemen raise 15 your right hands, please. 17 (Whereupon, the witnesses 18 Were duly sworn by the 19 Court, to speak the truth, 20 the whole truth and 21 nothing but the truth, 22 after which, the 23 proceedings were 24 resumed as follows:) Sandra M. Halsey, CSR, Official Court Reporter 15 1 2 THE COURT: You and each of you do 3 solemnly swear or affirm that the testimony you are about 4 to give in the cases styled The State of Texas versus 5 Darlie Lynn Routier, will be the truth, the whole truth, 6 and nothing but the truth, so help you God? 7 THE WITNESSES: I do. 8 THE COURT: All right. You are now 9 under -- you have now been sworn in. When Mr. Davis says 10 be back, be back. Thank you. 11 Any other witnesses coming in? 12 All right. Step up here, Miss. 13 Okay. All right. Don't worry about a 14 thing. All right. Your name, ma'am? 15 THE WITNESS: Halina Czaban, C-Z-A-B-A-N. 17 THE COURT: And how do you spell your 18 first name? 19 THE WITNESS: First name is, 20 H-A-L-I-N-A. 21 THE COURT: Do you speak English? 22 THE WITNESS: Yes. 23 THE COURT: And your native tongue 24 is -- THE WITNESS: Well, sometimes -- not Sandra M. Halsey, CSR, Official Court Reporter

1 very good. 2 THE COURT: What is your native tongue? 3 THE WITNESS: Polish. 4 THE COURT: But you understand me? 5 THE WITNESS: Yes, I understand. 6 THE COURT: And your name, ma'am? 7 THE WITNESS: Tammy Jovell. 8 THE COURT: If you will both raise 9 your right hands. 10 11 (Whereupon, the witness 12 Was duly sworn by the 13 Court, to speak the truth, 14 The whole truth and 15 Nothing but the truth, After which, the 17 Proceedings were 18 Resumed as follows: 19 20 21 THE COURT: You and each of you do 22 solemnly swear or affirm that the testimony you are about 23 to give in the cases styled the State of Texas versus 24 Darlie Lynn Routier, will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God? Sandra M. Halsey, CSR, Official Court Reporter 17 1 THE WITNESS: I do. 2 THE WITNESS: I do. 3 THE COURT: All right. Thank you. 4 Whenever Mr. Davis sees be back, be back. 5 THE WITNESS: All right. 6 THE COURT: All right. Thank you. 7 8 9 (Whereupon, this 10 Concluded the 11 Proceedings held, 12 In this cause, 13 On this date.) 14 15 17 18 19 20 21 22

23 24 Sandra M. Halsey, CSR, Official Court Reporter 18 1 CERTIFICATION PAGE 2 THE STATE OF TEXAS ) 3 THE COUNTY OF DALLAS ) 4 I, Sandra M. Halsey, Official Court Reporter of 5 Criminal District Court Number 3, of Dallas County, Texas, 6 do hereby certify that I reported in Stenograph notes the 7 foregoing proceedings, and that they have been edited by 8 me, or under my direction and the foregoing transcript 9 contains a full, true, complete and accurate transcript of 10 the proceedings held in this matter, to the best of my 11 knowledge. 12 I further certify that this transcript of the 13 proceedings truly and correctly reflects the exhibits, if 14 any, offered by the respective parties. 15 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO, this day of, 1996. 17 18 Sandra M. Day Halsey, CSR 19 Official Court Reporter 20 Criminal District Court No. 3 21 Dallas County, Texas 22 Phone, (214) 653-5923 23 24 Cert. No. 308 Exp 12-31-96 Sandra M. Halsey, CSR, Official Court Reporter 19 1 STATE OF TEXAS ) 2 COUNTY OF DALLAS) 3 4 JUDGES CERTIFICATE 5 6 7 8 The above and foregoing transcript, as certified by 9 the Official Court Reporter, having been presented to me, 10 has been examined and is approved as a true and correct 11 transcript of the proceedings had in the foregoing styled 12 cause, and aforementioned cause number of this case. 13 14 15

17 18 19 20 MARK TOLLE, JUDGE 21 Criminal District Court Number 3 22 Dallas County, Texas 23 24 Sandra M. Halsey, CSR, Official Court Reporter 20