COURAGEOUS LEADERSHIP Instilling Voter Confidence in Election Infrastructure

Similar documents
Understanding Election Administration & Voting

The California Voter s Choice Act: Managing Transformational Change with Voting System Technology

Statement on Security & Auditability

Voting System Examination Election Systems & Software (ES&S)

Verity Touch with Controller

Key Considerations for Implementing Bodies and Oversight Actors

SECURITY, ACCURACY, AND RELIABILITY OF TARRANT COUNTY S VOTING SYSTEM

The Future of Elections: Technology Policy & Funding Conference

Ballot Reconciliation Procedure Guide

RANKED VOTING METHOD SAMPLE PLANNING CHECKLIST COLORADO SECRETARY OF STATE 1700 BROADWAY, SUITE 270 DENVER, COLORADO PHONE:

ARKANSAS SECRETARY OF STATE

Global Conditions (applies to all components):

Security and Election Systems

Electronic Voting Machine Information Sheet

Audits: an in-depth review of Venezuela s automatic voting

Brittle and Resilient Verifiable Voting Systems

Key Considerations for Oversight Actors

ARKANSAS SECRETARY OF STATE. Rules on Vote Centers

E-Poll Books: The Next Certification Frontier

TO: Chair and Members REPORT NO. CS Committee of the Whole Operations & Administration

Voter Guide. Osceola County Supervisor of Elections. mary jane arrington

Voter Experience Survey November 2016

INSTRUCTIONS AND INFORMATION

Risk-Limiting Audits for Denmark and Mongolia

COMMISSION CHECKLIST FOR NOVEMBER GENERAL ELECTIONS (Effective May 18, 2004; Revised July 15, 2015)

Life in the. Fast Lane PREPARED BY ELECTION SYSTEMS & SOFTWARE ELECTION SYSTEMS & SOFTWARE

Scott Gessler Secretary of State

Michigan Election Reform Alliance P.O. Box Ypsilanti, MI

Colorado Secretary of State Election Rules [8 CCR ]

Study Background. Part I. Voter Experience with Ballots, Precincts, and Poll Workers

The name or number of the polling location; The number of ballots provided to or printed on-demand at the polling location;

Verity Touch Writer. Hart InterCivic Inc.

Pennsylvania Needs Resilient, Evidence-Based Elections

2018 General Election FAQs

L9. Electronic Voting

DIRECTIVE November 20, All County Boards of Elections Directors, Deputy Directors, and Board Members. Post-Election Audits SUMMARY

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA

GAO. Statement before the Task Force on Florida-13, Committee on House Administration, House of Representatives

Kitsap County Auditor Elections Division 2014 Voter Access Plan

Trusted Logic Voting Systems with OASIS EML 4.0 (Election Markup Language)

DOMESTIC ELECTION OBSERVATION KEY CONCEPTS AND INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS

DIRECTIVE FOR THE 2018 GENERAL ELECTION FOR ALL ELECTORAL DISTRICTS FOR VOTE COUNTING EQUIPMENT AND ACCESSIBLE VOTING EQUIPMENT

Acceptance Testing More Important Than Ever. Texas Association of Election Administrators January 10, 2018

Maryland State Board of Elections Comprehensive Audit Guidelines Revised: February 2018

A paramount concern in elections is how to regularly ensure that the vote count is accurate.

If your answer to Question 1 is No, please skip to Question 6 below.

City of Toronto Election Services Internet Voting for Persons with Disabilities Demonstration Script December 2013

FAQ s Voting Method & Appropriateness to PICC Elections

E- Voting System [2016]

DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE RULES AND BYLAWS COMMITTEE

The problems with a paper based voting

Oregon. Voter Participation. Support local pilot. Support in my state. N/A Yes N/A. Election Day registration No X

If further discussion would be of value, we stand by ready and eager to meet with your team at your convenience. Sincerely yours,

Absent Voter Counting Board Training. Joseph Rozell, Oakland County Director of Elections

Options for New Jersey s Voter-Verified Paper Record Requirement

Logic & Accuracy Testing

SECTION 8. ELECTION AND VOTER REGISTRATION RECORDS

Act means the Municipal Elections Act, 1996, c. 32 as amended;

Draft rules issued for comment on July 20, Ballot cast should be when voter relinquishes control of a marked, sealed ballot.

GAO ELECTIONS. States, Territories, and the District Are Taking a Range of Important Steps to Manage Their Varied Voting System Environments

Electronic Voting Systems

LOS ANGELES COUNTY Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk MEDIA KIT LAVote.net Nov.6,2018 General Election

Vote Tabulator. Election Day User Procedures

The purchase of new voting equipment

Kitsap County Auditor s Office

Risk-limiting Audits in Colorado

From Straw Polls to Scientific Sampling: The Evolution of Opinion Polling

Instructions for Closing the Polls and Reconciliation of Paper Ballots for Tabulation (Relevant Statutes Attached)

2018 University of Texas at Austin Voter Engagement Campus Plan

Post-Election Audit Pilots, and New Physical and Cyber Security Requirements in Indiana Election Code

RR/CC RESPONSE TO GRAND JURY REPORT

Josh Benaloh. Senior Cryptographer Microsoft Research

Mecklenburg County Department of Internal Audit. Mecklenburg County Board of Elections Elections Process Report 1476

June 4, Wisconsin Elections Commission 212 East Washington Avenue Madison, Wisconsin Dear Commissioners and Administrator Wolfe:

AUTOMATED AND ELECTRIC VEHICLES BILL DELEGATED POWERS MEMORANDUM BY THE DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT

3 GCA ELECTIONS CH. 7 BALLOTS CHAPTER 7 BALLOTS

Many irregularities occurred as Travis County conducted the City of Austin s City Council Runoff election:

Union Elections. Online Voting. for Credit. Helping increase voter turnout & provide accessible, efficient and secure election processes.

Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights OSCE/ODIHR DISCUSSION PAPER IN PREPARATION OF GUIDELINES FOR THE OBSERVATION OF ELECTRONIC VOTING

Where Have All the Voters Gone?

Submission for Roger Wilkins AO and the NSW Electoral Commission. Review of the NSW ivote internet and telephone voting system

Elections at Your Fingertips: App-ortunities to Connect with Wisconsin Voters

Voting in New South Wales Australia Bicameral Parliament hence two contests per election held every 4 years Lower House single candidate per

IN-POLL TABULATOR PROCEDURES

ANTI FRAUD MEASURES. Principles

THE V.O.T.E. In this issue: V O I C E O F T H E E L E C T I O N S. B r o w a r d C o u n t y S u p e r v i s o r o f E l e c t i o n s

Orange County Registrar of Voters. Survey Results 72nd Assembly District Special Election

Introduction of Electronic Voting In Namibia

L14. Electronic Voting

Risk-Limiting Audits

The Election Validation Project: Increasing Trust in Elections Through Audits, Standards, and Testing

Media Relations & Messaging. Brian Namey, Director of Public Affairs National Association of Counties (NACo) August 28, 2018

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 7013

WHY, WHEN AND HOW SHOULD THE PAPER RECORD MANDATED BY THE HELP AMERICA VOTE ACT OF 2002 BE USED?

Board receives letter of resignation for the Ward 4 Member of the State Board of Education, effective July 31, [3 DCMR 905.2].

South Dakota Central Election Reporting System

AD HOC COMMITTEE. Edward O.Ahumada Chairman. Robert D. Coogle Thomas H. Hardy Harold G. Mott

United States Election Assistance Commission

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. SENATE, No th LEGISLATURE

Direct Recording Electronic Voting Machines

Transcription:

Instilling Voter Confidence in Election Infrastructure

Instilling Voter Confidence in Election Infrastructure Today, rapidly changing technology and cyber threats not to mention the constant chatter on social media have impacted voter confidence to an unprecedented extent. It will take courageous action to address these pitfalls. As an election official, the more you can strengthen your relationship with the community, the more you will gain increased confidence from voters. The very foundation of voter confidence is the certainty that their state and local officials can be trusted to conduct well-run, independent, and objective elections. You and your staff have direct control over many aspects of how voters perceive your election infrastructure and the electoral process as a whole. The purpose of this white paper is to put the spotlight on three specific areas where proactive, courageous leadership can make a real impact on instilling voters with confidence. This is a challenging environment, but with leadership from the top, jurisdictions can further develop competency and expertise in: 1. Building credibility with the public 2. Demonstrating transparency and auditability 3. Communicating for trust and impact. By definition, election officials manage the election process from creating ballots to tabulating and certifying the results. And in this era of rapidly changing expectations, most election officials are wearing a second hat as IT directors. A successful and problem-free election includes all of the traditional tasks, plus compliance with a laundry list of federal and state standards and a ballooning array of technical challenges and risk management issues. 1 1 TrustTheVote Project, 2017. Exploring the Critical Nature of Election Infrastructure. Retrieved from https://trustthevote.org/2017/04/06/kudos-to-eac-on-election-infrastructure-as-critical/.

1 BUILDING CREDIBILITY WITH THE PUBLIC Some two decades into the information revolution, technology and its practitioners continue to exert a powerful mystique for many members of the public. By placing renewed emphasis on voter education and outreach and communicating in plain, down-to-earth language, you can go a long way toward demystifying the modern electoral process for your voters. With the right technology partner for your voting system, communication and education are made easier by features built into the process. With the latest generation of voting machines, voters can easily navigate ballots and verify that their choices are being captured as intended. A modern system gives voters a unique code to obtain their ballot, and screens that allow them to validate their ballot before casting it. These are all features that assure voters that the system is credible and trustworthy. With a process that is transparent and moves at their own pace, voters gain confidence that the electoral process is unfolding as it should. The confidence runs both ways. The right voting system vendor is a technology partner for you. Select a vendor who will work with you proactively to manage risks and technical issues in an agile and timely fashion. This enables you to place your focus on voter education and outreach, poll worker training, and other activities that help elections run smoothly on a repeatable basis building credibility and good will with your voters. 2 DEMONSTRATING TRANSPARENCY AND AUDITABILITY In the age of social media and sensationalistic media reports, how can you convey the message that your election was timely, accurate, and aboveboard? Demonstrate the transparency that comes with use of a modern voting system. For example, some voters may believe that the machines are networked to each other or to the voter registration system, that they connect to the internet or to wi-fi, or that elections can be hacked or have been hacked in the past. 2 In reality, none of these statements is true. 2 Brennan Center for Justice, 2016. Voting System Security and Reliability Risks. Retrieved from https://www.brennancenter.org/analysis/fact-sheet-voting-system-security-and-reliability-risks. 2

The electoral process is far more transparent than most people realize. You can educate the media and voters about how the chain of custody works for the election infrastructure. Demonstrate the built-in safeguards of your system and show how your voting system has no connection with the voter registration system, is not networked, and is air-gapped from the internet. Welcome the public and media to observe the ballot counting and adjudication process. 3 A modern voting system also enables you to make detailed information available to the public that proves the accuracy of how votes are recorded and tabulated, such as: Federal and state certifications for your system Functional test results that verify election hardware from voting machines to scanners to the tabulation system works and performs its functions as expected Public logic and accuracy testing and test results that verify that the voting data was recorded correctly for every candidate and race for each election Election results by precinct Audit reports that show Election Night totals match results of later random, independent audits, and account for any variances Public access to vote capture data, as applicable with your state laws Reports that document vital election practices. As the word gets out about how modern election infrastructure really works, you will facilitate the growth of confidence that your elections are being conducted competently. 4 3 Election Updates, 2017. Thoughts on voter confidence and election reform. Retrieved from https://electionupdates.caltech.edu/2017/09/12/thoughts-on-voter-confidence-and-election-reform/. 4 U.S. Election Assistance Commission, 2016. Election Administration and Voting Survey. Retrieved from https://www.eac.gov/assets/1/6/2016_eavs_comprehensive_report.pdf. 3

3 COMMUNICATING FOR TRUST AND IMPACT In today s fast-moving world of non-traditional communications, lowquality or misleading messages can circulate quickly, fueling voter fears. As an election official, it s up to you to put a process in place to address legitimate voter concerns with reliable and timely information. The strongest way to combat misleading information is to conduct an efficient, convenient election on modern, secure voting equipment. Voters who like and understand the process walk away feeling satisfied that their vote was cast according to their wishes and will be counted accurately. In a climate of trust, confusion or rumors don t get much traction. 5 Build trust and impact voter attitudes by treating communications as an essential part of voter service. When you implement a modern voting system, proactively offer training and education via local civic groups and push out tips and updates on your social media. Educate and welcome local media outlets and reporters. Additionally, voters should find that your website is the most accurate, up-to-date source about upcoming elections, what s on the ballot, and where and how to vote. Have a process in place so that when social media starts buzzing, you can keep voter confidence high by responding clearly, quickly, and accurately through your official channels. Similarly, when voters call the office or talk to a poll worker, they should be able to connect with people trained to answer questions about polling places, devices, and election situations such as absentee voting or accessibility. A recent study by the Harvard Business Review found that individuals who receive a quick, courteous response to their questions are more likely to believe an organization is on their side even if their issue could not be resolved. 6 5 Gallup News, 2016. Americans Confidence in Voting, Elections. Retrieved from http://news.gallup.com/poll/196976/update-americans-confidence-voting-election.aspx. 6 Harvard Business Review, 2018. How Customer Service Can Turn Angry Customers into Loyal Ones. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2018/01/how-customer-service-can-turn-angry-customers-intoloyal-ones. 4

CONCLUSION Protecting the electoral infrastructure takes courageous and far-sighted leadership. So does enhancing voter confidence. All over the country, election officials are peeling back the layers of prior practices and old expectations to address voter concerns by building credibility, demonstrating transparency and auditability, and communicating for trust and impact. While the challenges are formidable, the initiative is in your hands. You can build excellence in your organization by investing in training your people, improving your procedures, communicating with local media and partnering with the right technology vendor. By taking these steps, state and local election officials can instill voters with confidence in the election infrastructure and in the electoral process as a whole. Focus on voter education and outreach. Demonstrate the transparency in your modern voting system. Build enriching training experiences for pollworkers. Reinforce chain of custody security protocols. Use your channels of communications to promote public education. Select a technology vendor that will be a proactive partner. About Hart InterCivic Austin-based Hart InterCivic is a full-service election solutions innovator, partnering with state and local governments to deliver secure, accurate and reliable elections. Working side-by-side with election professionals for more than 100 years, Hart is committed to helping advance democracy one election at a time. Hart s mission fuels its passionate customer focus and a continuous drive for technological innovation. The company s new Verity Voting system makes voting more straightforward, equitable and accessible and makes managing elections more transparent, more efficient and easier. Only Hart offers a completely new, certified voting system with both electronic and paper options. 15500 Wells Port Drive Austin, TX 78728 info@hartic.com 800.223.HART 2018 Hart InterCivic, Inc. All rights reserved. 5