Basic Information on Professor Eaton s Torts Class (Section Y) Fall 2017

Similar documents
Torts Syllabus Summer AJD Class. Course text: Dominick Vetri, Lawrence Levine, Joan Vogel & Ibrahim Gassama, Tort Law and Practice, 5th ed.

OAKLAND UNIVERSITY PARALEGAL PROGRAM SYLLABUS. CEPL Substantive Law: TORTS

Summary of Contents. PART I. INTRODUCTION Chapter 1. An Introduction to the Restatement of Torts... 2

TORTS Course: LAW 508 Fall Semester 2017

TORTS Course: LAW 509 (Sections 2 & 4) Spring Semester 2018

TORTS. University of Houston Spring, Deana Pollard-Sacks, Visiting Professor of Law

Contents. Table of Statutes. Table of Secondary Legislation. Table of Cases. General Principles of Liability

Torts Office: Hazel Hall 307 Office Hours: Tuesday, 8:00 PM to. August 20 through November 27 Exam: Monday, Dec. 10 at 6:00 PM

Customer will bring an action against Businessman under a negligence theory.

MBE WORKSHOP: TORTS PROFESSOR LISA MCELROY DREXEL UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW

TORT LAW. By Helen Jordan, Elaine Martinez, and Jim Ponce

Question 1. Under what theory or theories might Paul recover, and what is his likelihood of success, against: a. Charlie? b. KiddieRides-R-Us?

Negligence: Elements

TORT LAW. Third Edition. Lewis N. Klar, Q.C. B.A., B.C.L., LL.M. Professor of Law University of Alberta THOMSON - ^ CARSWELL

Understanding the RM Process

Legal Liability in Adventure Tourism

OAKLAND UNIVERSITY PARALEGAL PROGRAM SYLLABUS CEPL # INTRODUCTION TO THE LAW AND ETHICS

Restatement Third of Torts: Coordination and Continuation *

PSC 333: The U.S. Congress 209 Graham Building Mondays & Wednesdays, 2:00-3:15 Spring Course Description

Torts I Outline. Right on the law. Relevant Reasonable Not Repetitive. You got this. Lewis & Clark Law School Fall Semester 2017 Professor Gomez

The Empowered Paralegal Cause of Action Handbook

Shanghai Jiao Tong University. LA200 Business Law

A. COURSE DESCRIPTION

INTENTIONAL MISCONDUCT:

THE SELF-HELP GUIDE TO THE LAW Negligence and Personal Injury Law for Non-Lawyers

HEALTH CARE LIABILITY UPDATE, 2014

MASTERING TORTS FOURTH EDITION

John Marshall Law School Spring 2015 Remedies Evening Division. Thursdays 6:15p.m.-9:30p.m., Room TBA

Exam #2 LAWS 3930 Page 1 of 6

Substantial certainty that the action could cause SED is required as well, physical manifestations of the ED have been traditionally required

RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF TORTS: COORDINATION AND CONTINUATION

Negligent In Your Legal Knowledge?

Torts Fall 2015 Professor Ray

TORTS: JUST THE RULES

Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California. Law & Order Code TITLE 3 TORTS. [Last Amended 10/1/04. Current Through 2/3/09.]

SUMMARY OF CONTENTS Oregon Jury Instructions for Civil Cases USERS GUIDE... (11/08)

Robert I, Duke of Normandy. 22 June July 1035

COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL THE LEGAL CONTEXT OF CONSTRUCTION 1.1 INTRODUCTION

LAW Rule of conduct enforced by controlling authority; provides order, stability, and justice.

Strict Liability and Product Liability PRODUCT LIABILITY WARRANTY LAW

THE LAW PROFESSOR TORT LAW ESSAY SERIES ESSAY QUESTION #3 MODEL ANSWER

Engineering Law. Professor Barich Class 8

THE COMMON LAW LIBRARY CLERK & LINDSELL TORTS TWENTIETH EDITION

Why Use Audience Response Methods?

CONTRACTS. A contract is a legally enforceable agreement between two or more parties whereby they make the future more predictable.

MARK SCHEME for the May/June 2010 question paper for the guidance of teachers 9084 LAW. 9084/43 Paper 43, maximum raw mark 75

Review of Cases and Materials on Torts, By Young B. Smith & William L. Prosser

INTENTIONAL TORTS. clkko t rs 1

CONTRACT LAW Part II * Spring 2018 Course Number Location: F. J. JACKSON Office Hours Course Books / Material Course Description Course Objectives

Tort Reform (2) The pleading specifically asserts that the medical care has and all medical records

ESSAY INTRODUCTION PROFESSOR RICHARD T. SAKAI. Copyright 2018 by BARBRI, Inc.

Business Law Tort Law Unit Textbook

Law of Tort (Paper 22, Unit 22) Syllabus - for the June and October 2009 Examinations

Canadian Systems of Law Contract and Tort Law for Professionals There are two systems of law that operate in Canada: Common Law and Civil Law.

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT. Brooklyn in which he was serving out the last months of his prison sentence to a

PROFESSOR DEWOLF FALL 2009 December 12, 2009 FINAL EXAM SAMPLE ANSWER

FLORIDA STATE COLLEGE AT JACKSONVILLE COLLEGE CREDIT COURSE OUTLINE. ENC 1101 or ENC 1101C, PLA 1003 (each

CED: An Overview of the Law

Question Farmer Jones? Discuss. 3. Big Food? Discuss. -36-

PET. Professional Employment Test.

Professor DeWolf Summer 2014 Torts August 18, 2014 SAMPLE ANSWER TO FINAL EXAM MULTIPLE CHOICE

CHAPTER ON READING AND BRIEFING CASES

How to Use Torts Tactically in Employment Litigation

CALIFORNIA ESSAY WRITING WORKSHOP PROFESSOR CHRISTOPHER IDE-DON UC DAVIS SCHOOL OF LAW

BLAW BUSINESS LAW, SECTION B3

Fall 1994 December 12, 1994 SAMPLE ANSWER TO MID-TERM EXAM QUESTION 1

Cambridge Assessment International Education Cambridge International Advanced Subsidiary and Advanced Level. Published

Answer A to Question 4

STATE OF VERMONT RETAIL COMPENDIUM OF LAW

The College of Charleston. Spring POLI American Government. Tu-Th 9:25-10:40. Maybank 207. Tuesdays 3:00-4 P.M. and by appointment

HAMLINE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW I: The Craft of Constitutional Argument. Section 2 Three Credits Spring 2010 S Y L L A B U S

End of First Nine Weeks

klm Report on the Examination Law examination - June series General Certificate of Education

MODULE TITLE:Business Law

A LEGAL SELF-HELP HANDBOOK

Friday 19 May 2017 Afternoon Time allowed: 1 hour 30 minutes

Econ 522 Review 3: Tort Law, Criminal Law, and the Legal Process

Chapter List. Real Estate Broker, Escrow Agent and Notary Liability

California Bar Examination

Courthouse News Service

Case 3:12-cv Document 1 Filed 11/15/12 Page 1 of 17

Torts I review session November 20, 2017 SLIDES. Negligence

MARK SCHEME for the October/November 2013 series 9084 LAW. 9084/42 Paper 4, maximum raw mark 75

Edited'by: Uniting Plaintiff, Defense, Insurance, and Corporate Counsel to Advance the Civil Justice System

California State University, Northridge BLAW 280: Business Law 1 Spring 2014

Casebook pages Chapter 9: Battery, Assault & False Imprisonment. Battery

Credit: 3 semester credit hours Prerequisite/Co-requisite: None. Course Description. Required Textbook and Materials

LAW DIVISION: MORRIS COUNTY DOCKET NO.: MRS-L CIVIL ACTION. Plaintiff, Richard Balestrino, residing in Vernon, Sussex

Intentional Torts. What Is a Tort? Tort Recovery

on your blue computer graded bubble sheet in the appropriate location.

Case: 3:12-cv JZ Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/21/12 1 of 7. PageID #: 1

REMEDIES Spring Term Syllabus

The Importance of Ethical and Legal Decision Making p. 1 Introduction p. 1 Focus Questions p. 1 Key Terms p. 1 Case Study: Tough Times Await at

A-LEVEL LAW. LAW02 The Concept of Liability Report on the Examination June Version: v0.1

Oregon Uniform Civil Jury Instructions

FALL 2006 December 5, 2006 MIDTERM EXAM SAMPLE ANSWER

CONDENSED OUTLINE FOR TORTS I

HYDERALLY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

STATE OF IOWA RETAIL COMPENDIUM OF LAW

ANSWER A TO QUESTION 3

Transcription:

Basic Information on Professor Eaton s Torts Class (Section Y) Fall 2017 1 Required Text: Prosser, Wade and Schwartz s Torts Cases and Materials (13 th edition 2015) (PWS); Required Text: The American Law Institute, A Concise Restatement of Torts, Third Edition (2013) (R/S) Other Secondary Sources: Dan Dobbs et. al., The Law of Torts (2d ed. 2016); Prosser & Keeton, Torts (5 th edition); Restatement of Torts (all on reserve in the library) 2 Classroom Expectations A B C Be prepared to discuss the assigned materials in detail; prepare written briefs of cases; make sure your brief includes a summary of the procedural posture of the case (I will explain what this means in class); also, ask yourself why is this case in the book? no cell phones, beepers etc. If any electronic device goes off in class, please gather your materials and leave I will try and stay on track with the assignments posted in the Syllabus below, but sometimes class discussion will dictate revisions. 3 Exams and Grading A B C D Your grade will be based primarily on your performance on the final exam. Class participation is factored in when drawing the lines necessary to comply with the Law School s mandatory grade curve. Historically, class participation has affected the final grades of approximately 10% of the class. My exams tend to be of the fact pattern variety. Old exams are available in the library. These exams will not be identical to the exam you will take since Torts has been revised from a two semester six hour course to a one semester four hour course. I will distribute a practice exam question that will be graded by my teaching assistant. I allow (indeed encourage), but do not require students to type their exams on computers. If you wish to avail yourself of this option, you will need to register for special exam software. You will receive more information about this later in the semester. You will be permitted to use your required text, materials distributed by me, and any class notes or outlines that you personally prepare. You may not use any photocopied or downloaded materials other than those provided by me. You cannot use class notes taken or an outline prepared by anyone other than yourself.

Torts Syllabus Fall Semester 2017 Class # Topic Assigned readings INTRODUCTION AND INTENTIONAL TORTS 1 Introduction PWS pp. 1-4; Torts and Compensation Chapter 1 (Dobbs) (on e-reserve) 2 Intent PWS pp. 17-20; R/S Chap. 2, 1; Torts and Compensation Chapter 2 (Dobbs) (on e- reserve) 3 Intent PWS pp. 20-26; R/S Chap. 2 13, 16 4 Intent PWS pp. 26-31; 5 Battery/touch PWS pp. 31-39; R/S Chap 2, 13 and 18 6 Assault PWS pp. 39-42; R/S 21, 22, 30, 31; When is Speech Violence? (E-reserve) 7 False Imprisonment PWS pp. 42-49; 51-53; R/S Chap. 2, 35-41 8 IIED PWS pp. 58-69; Jones v. Clinton (e-reserve); R/S Chap. 13, 45-46 9 Consent PWS pp. 97-100; R/S Chap. 4, 892 10 Consent PWS pp. 100-110; Elkington v. Foust (ereserve); R/S Chap. 4, 172 11 Consent Review prior materials 12 Self-Defense/Others PWS pp. 110-113; Self-Defense Materials (e-reserve); R/S Chap. 4, 63, 65, 76 13 Defense of Property PWS pp. 114-120; R/S Chap 4, 77, 84, 85 NEGLIGENCE: WHAT IS REASONABLE CONDUCT? 14 Reasonable Person PWS pp. 155-169; R/S Chap. 5, 3, 9,12, 13

15 Children/Disability PWS pp. 169-179; R/S Chap. 5, 10-12 16 Costs and benefits PWS pp. 142-154; Review R/S Chap. 5, 3 17 Economic Analysis Law and Economic Readings (e-reserve) 18 Professionals (Malpractice) PWS pp. 182-193 19 Expert Witnesses PWS pp. 194-98; MCG Health Inc. v. Barton (expert witness) and O.C.G.A. 24-7-702 (e-reserve) 20 Informed Consent PWS pp. 199-211; O.C.G.A. 31-9-6 and 31-9-6.1(e-reserve) 21 Violation of Statues PWS pp. 218-237; R/S Chap. 5, 14, 16 22 Excuses/Procedure PWS pp. 238-243; R/S Chap. 5, 15 23 Res Ipsa Loquitur PWS pp. 251-253; pp. 257-272; R/S Chap. 5, 17 WHEN IS UNREASONABLE CONDUCT A CAUSE OF HARM? 24 The Basic But For Test PWS pp. 273-85; R/S Chap. 8 26 25 Lost Chance PWS pp. 285-90; Falcon v. Memorial Hosp. (e-reserve); R/S Chap 8, 26, comment n 26 Causation Con t MCG Health Inc. v. Barton (causation) (ereserve); PWS pp. 290-303; R/S Chap. 8, 27 27 Who Done It? PWS pp. 303-311; R/S Chap. 8, 28 THE SCOPE OF LIABILITY: PROXIMATE CAUSE 28 The Search for Limits PWS pp. 313-317; 320-329; R/S Chap. 9, 29 29 Prox Cause Con t PWS pp. 329-338; 372-379 30 Thin Skull and Rescuers PWS pp. 317-320; 359-366; R/S Chap. 9, 31, 32 31 Intervening Forces PWS pp. 344-359; R/S, Chap. 9, 34-36

SPECIAL RULES FOR SPECIAL CASES 32 Affirmative Duties PWS pp. 442-45; A Theory of Strict Liability (Epstein) (e-reserve); R/S Chap. 11, 37-44 33 Exceptions PWS pp. 446-457; R/S Chap. 11, 37-44 34 Economic Loss PWS pp. 457-469 35 Emotional Distress PWS pp. 469-484; Lee v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co. (e-reserve) 36 Possessors of Land (off premise injuries) PWS pp. 501-506; Sprecher v. Adamson (e-reserve) R/S Chap. 12, 49, 54 37 Possessors of Land (on premise injuries) PWS pp. 506-520; R/S Chap. 12, 50-52 38 Other cases, Merging, and Lessors PWS pp. 520-535; R/S Chap. 12, 53 39 Negligent Security PWS pp. 535-539; Bayshore Co. v. Pruitt AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 40 Contributory Negligence and LCC PWS pp. 619-625; R/S Chap. 10, 3 41 Comparative Negligence/Fault PWS pp. 626-635; R/S Chap 10, 8 42 Statutes and Problems Comparative Fault Statute (e-reserve) 43 Assumption of Risk PWS pp. 637-648; Crews v. Hollenback (e-reserve); R/S Chap. 10, 2 44 Implied A/R and Comp. Fault PWS pp. 648-652; Monk v. VI Water & Power (e-reserve) MULTIPLE DEFENDANT ISSUES: WHO OWES HOW MUCH? 45 Joint and Several Liability PWS pp. 385-396; R/S Chap. 18, 10, 11, 15

46 Contribution and Indemnity PWS pp. 409-418; R/S Chap. 18, 22, 23 47 Settlements PWS pp. 396-409 48 Statues and Problems Problems in Multi-Defendant Litigation (e-reserve) 49 Apportionment in Georgia Who Owes How Much? (e-reserve) DAMAGES 50 Compensatory Damages PWS pp. 541-163 51 Compensatory Damages Con t Review prior material; add pp. 563-569 52 Property and Punitive Damages PWS pp. 569-578 53 Punitive Damages Con t PWS pp. 578-591 54 Wrongful Death ans Survivorship PWS Chapter 11