POLS686: Seminar in International Relations: International Organizations Department of Political Science Northern Illinois University Spring 2018 Thursday, 3:30-6:10pm DuSable Hall 464 Instructor: Dr. Aarie Glas Office: Zulauf Hall 412 Office Hours: T 2-4pm, R 1-3pm, and by appointment Email: aglas@niu.edu I. Overview This course examines international organization and International Organizations how international relations are structured and why, and a number of inter-governmental and non-governmental organizations themselves. In doing so, it offers a theoretically informed and empirical rigorous engagement with a number of important debates in International Relations, including: the interaction of domestic and international politics; the potential for and limits of inter-state cooperation; the role of power in the international arena; and the possibilities and sources of change in or of the international system. The course is (roughly) structured over three parts. Part I surveys major strands of IR theory that comment on questions of international order and organization. Part II turns to inter-state cooperation by examining inter-governmental organizations themselves (the United Nations, European Union, Association of Southeast Asian Nations, and African Union). Part three, briefly, turns our attention to sub-state and trans-national actors. Two issues to note: First, this course is necessarily selective. Notably absent is a focus on international economic or financial institutions (i.e. the Bretton Woods Institutions). This is a reality of the tension between brevity and rigor in any graduate course. It also reflects an interest in complementarity with POLS684. Political Economy of International Relations, which will be offered in Fall 2018. Second, this is an advanced graduate seminar in IR. It assumes students have a solid foundation in IR theory. While we will make use of three seminars to engage with IR theory directly, this should build on competency rather than found it. Students are encouraged to review materials assigned within POLS690 (International Relations Theory) in advance of this course where possible, and/or survey recommended readings as the course progresses. v.1 1
II. Learning Objectives By the end of this course, students will: Understand major debates in IR regarding the structure, order, and organization of the international system and the importance of various actors; Be familiar with a number of specific international organizations; Be confident and rigorous with their engagement of IR literature concerning the key debates surveyed in the course, and; Undertake serious scholarly research on empirical and theoretical debates concerning international organization and IOs. III. Grade Distribution Assignment Weight (points) Due: 1. Class participation 20 On-going 2. Weekly summaries (10x1): 10 On-going 3. Seminar Presentations (10x2): 20 Writing Workshop, Seminar 9 or 10 4. Major Research Essay a. Draft 15 Four (4) days before Writing Workshop b. Final 35 Seminar 13 IV. Requirements Half of course requirements relate directly to the weekly seminars and their readings: participating in seminars, leading seminars, and providing weekly summaries. Half of the course requirements stem from the components of a major student-driven research essay. 1. Class Participation: Students are expected to attend having read and reflected upon all the required readings each week in advance of our Seminars. Students are required to engage actively and thoughtfully in discussions each week and to consistently demonstration reflection on our readings. Participation assessment will reflect the quality and consistency of contributions to our course. Participation will also reflect engagement and level of contributions within the writing workshops (see below). 2. Weekly Summaries: Students are required to submit ten (10) weekly summaries (for Seminars 2-8 and 11-13). Weekly Responses should reflect on all the required readings for the week. They need not be terribly detailed, but should highlight the core arguments and some key examples or illustrations used across the required readings. Responses must be one (1) page single-spaced (1 inch margins, size 12 font). Responses are due by the conclusion of each relevant Seminar. No late Responses are accepted for any reason. Weekly Responses will be assessed on the following four-tiered scale: 0.00/1 = inadequate 0.50/1 = adequate 0.75/1 = good 1.00/1 = excellent v.1 2
Expectations will be outlined in our first seminar, but keep in mind that cogent synthesis of the core of the argument(s) and corresponding evidence will be valued. The intention of this assignment is to incentivize reflection on readings provide for concise and wellwritten summaries which will aid in your ability to satisfy course requirements (i.e. participation and the Essay) and assist with research design and/or Field Exams outside of the bounds of the course. 3. Seminar Presentations: Students are required to lead two (2) seminars over the course of the semester alone or in pairs, depending on student enrolment over the semester. Presentations are comprised of three aspects: (1) a 20-30 minute presentation highlighting the core elements of the required readings of that week and linkages to other aspects of the course where appropriate; (2) responding to questions related to the presentation, and; (3) offer at least four important questions for the class, the discussion of which they will lead for the remainder of the class. The latter two elements may blur, but students should be prepared to discuss the readings in detail, expand upon points raised during their presentation, and lead the subsequent discussion in the seminar. Please note: discussion questions are due at 4pm the day before the relevant seminar, to be uploaded to the course Blackboard web page. All students must review and come prepared to discuss these questions and beyond. 4. Major Research Essay: Students are required to write (and present within a workshop) a major research essay on a topic related to the course of their choice. Students are encouraged to speak to me in office hours early (and as often as you like) as they refine their topic and develop a clear, argumentative thesis that enables them to draw on relevant literature as they see fit. The paper may be largely theoretical, or largely empirical. However, it must be argumentative rather than descriptive. Students must make a clear and cohesive argument relying on a breadth of literature from within and beyond the course as they see fit. The intention of this assignment is to allow for levity to explore topics related to course material that align with your own research interests, and to produce a cohesive and polished essay that may be a forerunner for a conference paper or component in a larger dissertation or other research project. The Major Research Essay will be produced vis-à-vis two assignment submissions: A. Essay Draft (& Presentation): Students are required to provide a draft version of their major research essay to be presented and discussed with their colleagues in one of two Writing Workshops as determined by lottery. The Draft Essay needs to articulate the core components of the essay and should be a polished piece of writing which you will endeavor to expand upon in substance and refine in polish for the final version. The Draft Essay should be not more than 2,500 words, excluding references. Do not exceed the limit. The Draft Essay is due electronically to the course Blackboard web page by 4pm on the Sunday before the Workshop. Students will prepare a 10-15 minute informal presentation on their paper which will precede and ground the discussion in the Workshop. v.1 3
Students will respond to questions raised by class, and together we will attempt refine and discussion the preliminary draft. B. Final Essay: Students are required to provide a final version of their essay which is no more than 6,000 words, excluding references. Further details of the Essay assignment will be provided within Week 3 of the course via Blackboard and discussed in class. Details of the Writing Workshops will be provided by Week 5, dependent on potential fluctuations in course enrollment. V. Assessment Details of expectations will be provided in advance of each assignment orally in class or via separate documents on Blackboard where appropriate. Students are encouraged to speak to me in office hours about assessment practices, preferences, recommendations, and the like as you see fit. All assignments will be scored out of their weight in the course as noted (above). Final Course Grades (alphabetic) will be calculated based on the distributions of points: VI. Submission of Assignments 93+ points A 77-79 C+ 90-92 A- 74-76 C 87-89 B+ 70-73 C- 84-86 B 67-69 D+ 80-83 B- 60-66 D <60 F All course assignments are required in hardcopy unless noted otherwise above (e.g. the Draft Essay). All assignments must be double-sided, stapled, and clearly presented. Student names, student numbers, course code, and Instructor name should be clearly visible on a title page or header, and page numbers are required. All submitted work must be clearly and formally cited and a bibliography provided for all assignments except for Weekly Responses where no bibliographies are required. Late assignments will be not accepted and thus will be scored a zero, except in exceptional extenuating circumstances (e.g. a medical emergency) as determined by the Instructor. Extensions and accommodations may be possible for documented medical or family emergencies or when agreed to with me, well in advance of a due date. Wherever possible, speak to me as early as possible in the semester to discuss complications or requests for accommodation. Leniency in this regard may be possible. However, it is more likely weeks in advance of a due date than the week of or after a due date has passed. Note that no accommodation is guaranteed and students are expected to plan ahead to complete all written work on or before the relevant due date. v.1 4
VII. Course Materials There are no required course texts. We will primarily be utilizing journal articles accessible online through the Library or other institutions as appropriate. However, a number of texts are used within the course in part and may be useful as preliminary readers beyond: Michael Barnett and Martha Finnemore (2004). Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. (NIU ebook available) Margaret Keck and Kathryn Sikkink (1998), Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Cornell University Press. (NIU ebook available) Ian Hurd (2007), After Anarchy: Legitimacy and Power in the United National Security Council. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (NIU ebook available) Ian Hurd (2017) International Organizations: Politics, Law, Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Students concerned about their competency with IR theory are recommended to familiarize themselves, at very least, with the following: Christian Reus-Smit and Duncan Snidal (2008), The Oxford Handbook of International Relations. Oxford University Press. VIII. A Note on Seminar Readings Weekly Seminar readings are divided into required and recommended readings in the below Seminar Plan (required readings are not labeled). The required readings are just that: required. Students must have accessed, read, and reflected on them prior to each week s discussion. Most required readings are drawn from journal sources that are available electronically through the NIU library. Required readings that are not available electronically will left on reserve in the Library or provided electronically through the course Blackboard page, when copyright permits. It is up to students to ensure they access these readings in a timely and efficient manner. This may require coordination with other students in the course or accessing the readings well in advance of specific Seminars, so please do not leave readings to the last minute. The recommended readings are suggestions for further reading. Many will help inform course assignments and students own research beyond the course. v.1 5
IX. Office Hours Office Hours will be held weekly (as noted on page 1). These are drop-in times and all students are always welcome to attend to discuss anything related to the course, or anything else you feel that I could potentially help with. No RSVP is required. Students are encouraged to visit as often as they like. If you cannot meet during this period, please email me well in advance to arrange an alternative time, and I am sure I can accommodate your schedule. X. Email Contact I will (try to) answer questions by email when appropriate. Please use the course code somewhere in the subject line and ensure you make use of your official NIU email address for all communications. Those two requirements help ensure that emails are received and read in a timely manner. A 24-48 hour turnaround time should be anticipated, so please do not leave questions to the last minute. Substantive questions regarding course materials and discussions or concerns or questions about the assignments are best discussed in Office Hours and not by email. Alternatively, please feel free to raise questions at the onset of our Seminars for the benefit of all your colleagues in the course. As a rule of thumb, if a question or a welcomed response is longer than three or so sentences, it is likely a topic to chat about in Office Hours or in our Seminars. XI. Our Space and Issues of Accessibility Together, we will foster a comfortable, engaging, and accessible scholarly environment. All students should feel welcome to attend and speak freely in our Seminars and in Office Hours. To this end we will approach this course as colleagues, and we will treat each other with respect and dignity at all times. NIU, and myself as your Instructor, are committed to making reasonable accommodations for persons with documented disabilities. If any disabilities may impact on coursework or other academic requirements, please notify both your Instructor and the Disability Resource Center (Tel. 815-753-1303) on the fourth floor of the Health Services Building as soon as possible, and within the first two weeks of the start of this course. If you would rather not speak to your Instructor, note that the Disability Resource Center can assist students in making appropriate accommodations with Instructors discretely. If you have any concerns about the course or your ability to access or engage with the course material or our discussions at any point throughout the semester please also feel free to contact me by email or speak to me in person, whenever. I will happy to assist as best as I am able. I am also happy to raise any issues or concerns you may have on your behalf with the Department or NIU directly. v.1 6
XII. Preferred Names and Pronouns Class rosters and University data systems are provided to faculty with the student s legal name and legal gender marker. As an NIU student, you are able to change how your preferred/proper name shows up on class rosters. This option is helpful for various student populations, including but not limited to: students who abbreviate their first name; students who use their middle name; international students; and transgender students. As your Instructor, I am committed to using your proper name and pronouns. We will take time during our first class together to do introductions, at which point you can share with all members of our Seminar what name and pronouns you use, as you are comfortable. Additionally, if these change at any point during the semester, please let me know and we can develop a plan to share this information with others in a way that is safe for you. Should you want to update your preferred/proper name, you can do so by looking at the following guidelines and frequently asked questions: http://www.niu.edu/regrec/preferredname/index.shtml http://www.niu.edu/regrec/preferredname/preferrednamefaq.shtml XIII. Academic Integrity Students are expected to have read and to abide by NIU s Student Code of Conduct (http://www.niu.edu/conduct/student-code-of-conduct). This course will take academic misconduct seriously. All work submitted must be original submissions and students own in full. While graduate students should be entirely familiar with issues of academic (dis)honesty, please take NIU s Online Tutorial on Academic Integrity to re-familiarize yourself if you have doubts or concerns (http://www.niu.edu/ai/students/) and/or speak to me in Office Hours. Any student in this course found to have plagiarized (accidentally or otherwise) the work of another individual (including, but not limited to other students and from existing scholarship) will receive a failing grade in this course and may be subject to additional sanctions by the University. If you have any questions throughout the course relating to academic practices, academic integrity, and issues of plagiarism please speak to me and/or consult the links noted above. Note: With the above in mind, please ensure that all drafts, preliminary work, and research notes, as well as all graded and returned course assignments, are retained until course grades are finalized by the Registrar. As your Instructor, I may request to review either draft or finalized material at any point during the course and/or discuss student assignments in person. v.1 7
XIV. Seminar Plan: Seminar No. Date Topic Seminar 1. January 18 Introduction Seminar 2. January 25 Anarchy and Order Seminar 3. February 1 Institutions and Rationality Seminar 4. February 8 Institutions and Ideas Seminar 5. February 15 Institutional Design Seminar 6. February 22 The United Nations Seminar 7. March 1 Intervention, Peacekeeping, and R2P Seminar 8. March 8 Regions, Regional Organizations, and Europe March 15 No Class Spring Break Seminar 9. March 22 Writing Workshop I Seminar 10. March 29 Writing Workshop II April 5 No Class Dr. Glas away for ISA Seminar 11. April 12 The Association of Southeast Asian Nations Seminar 12. April 19 The African Union Seminar 13. April 26 International Non-Governmental Organizations Seminar 14 May 3 Global Civil Society &Towards a World Government (?) Note: topics and readings may be subject to change at the discretion of your Instructor. Any change to the required readings will be posted at least seven (7) days prior to the relevant Seminar. Any change in the above schedule (e.g. the cancellation or rescheduling of a Seminar) will be noted as soon as possible by your Instructor. v.1 8
XV. Detailed Seminar Plan PART I. Theorizing Order, Organization, and Power Seminar 1. Introduction Read the Syllabus in Full Peter Katzenstein, Robert O. Keohane, and Stephen D. Krasner (1998), International Organization and the Study of World Politics, International Organization, 52(4): pp. 645-85. James G. March and Johan P. Olsen, The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders, International Organization 52, 4 (Autumn 1998), pp. 943-969. Michael Barnett and Raymond Duvall (2005), Power in International Relations International Organization 59: pp. 39-75. Stefano Guzzini (2005), The Concept of Power: A Constructivist Analysis, Millennium 33(3): pp. 495-521. March, James G. and Johan P. Olson (1989), Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press. Michael Barnett and Martha Finnemore (2004). Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Especially Chapter 2. John G. Ikenberry (2001), Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order. Princeton University Press. Especially Chapter 2. Deborah D. Avant, Martha Finnemore and Susan K. Sell (eds.) (2009), Who Governs the Globe? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Anne-Marie Slaughter (2004), A New World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Seminar 2. Anarchy and Order Kenneth N. Waltz (1986 [1979]). Anarchic Orders and Balances of Power, in Robert O. Keohane, Neorealism and its Critics. Cornell University Press. Hedley Bull (1977). The Anarchical Society. New York: Columbia University Press. Chapters 1 & 2. v.1 9
John J. Mearsheimer (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: Norton. Chapter 2. John J. Mearsheimer (1994/5), The False Promise of International Institutions, International Security, 19(3): pp. 5-49. Helen Milner (1991), The assumption of anarchy in international relations theory: a critique, Review of International Studies 17(1): pp. 67-85. Robert Gilpin (1981), War and Change in World Politics Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hedley Bull (1977). The Anarchical Society. New York: Columbia University Press. Robert O. Keohane (ed.) (1986), Neorealism and its Critics. Cornell University Press. Jack Donnelly (2012), The Elements of the Structures of International Systems, International Organization 66(4): pp. 609-643. Martha Finnemore (2009), Legitimacy, Hypocrisy, and the Social Structure of Unipolarity: Why Being a Unipole Isn t All Its Cracked up to Be, World Politics 61(1): pp. 58-85. Jennifer Mitzen (2006), Ontological security in world politics European Journal of International Relations 12(3): pp. 341 370. Ted Hopf (2010), The logic of habit in International Relations, European Journal of International Relations 16(4): pp. 539 561. Seminar 3. Institutions and Rationality Robert Axelrod and Robert Keohane (1985), Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions World Politics 38(1): 226-254. Robert Keohane (1984), Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Chapter 6. Joseph M. Grieco (1988), Anarchy and the limits of cooperation: a realist critique of the newest liberal institutionalism, International Organization 42(3): pp. 487-507. Robert O. Keohane and Lisa Martin (1995), The Promise of Institutionalist Theory. International Security 20(1): pp. 39-51. v.1 10
James N. Rosenau (1986), Before Cooperation: Hegemons, Regimes, and Habit-Driven Actors in World Politics, International Organization 40(4): pp. 849-894. Duncan Snidal (1985), The limits of hegemonic stability theory, International Organization 39(4): pp. 579-614. Robert Keohane (1984), After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. James D. Fearon, Bargaining, Enforcement, and International Cooperation, International Organization 52(2): pp. 269-305. Robert Axelrod (1981), The Emergence of Cooperation Among Egoists. American Political Science Review 75(2): pp. 306-318. Seminar 4. Institutions and Ideas Alexander Wendt (1992), Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics, International Organization, 46(2): pp. 391-425. Michael Barnett and Martha Finnemore (1999), The politics, power, and pathologies of international organizations. International Organization 53(4): pp. 699-732. Martha Finnemore (1993), International Organizations as Teachers of Norms: The United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural organization and Science Policy, International Organization 47(4): pp. 565-597. Alastair Iain Johnston (2001), Treating International Institutions as Social Environments, International Studies Quarterly, 45(4): pp. 487-515. Brian Rathbun (2011), Before Hegemony: Generalized Trust and the Creation and Design of International Security Organizations, International Organization 65(2): pp. 243-273): pp. 243-273. Christian Reus-Smit (1997), The Constitutional Structure of International Society and the Nature of Fundamental Institutions, International Organization 51(4): pp. 555-589. Alastair Iain Johnston (1995), Thinking about strategic culture International Security, 19(4): pp. 32-64. v.1 11
Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink (1998), International Norm Dynamics and Political Change, International Organization 52(4): pp. 887-917. Rebecca Adler-Nissen (2014), Stigma Management in International Relations: Transgressive Identities, Norms, and Order in International Society, International Organization 68(1): pp. 143-176. Emmanuel Adler and Vincent Pouliot (2011), International Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. PART II. IGOs Seminar 5. Institutional Design & Compliance Kenneth W. Abbott and Duncan Snidal (1998), Why States Act through Formal International Organizations, Journal of Conflict Resolution 42(1): pp. 3-32. Barbara Koremenos, Charles Lipson and Duncan Snidal (2001), The Rational Design of International Institutions. International Organization 55(4): pp. 761 799. Daniel L. Nielson and Michael J. Tierney (2003), Delegation to International Organizations: Agency Theory and World Bank Environmental Reform, International Organization 57(2): pp. 241-276. Jonas Tallberg et al., (2014), Explaining the Transnational Design of International Organizations International Organization 68(4): pp. 741-774. Abram Chayes and Antonia Handler Chayes (1993), On Compliance, International Organization 47(2): pp. 175-205. Jeffrey T. Checkel (2001), Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change International Organization 55(3): pp. 553-588. Kenneth W. Abbott, Robert O. Keohane, Andrew Moravscik, Anne-Marie Slaughter and Duncan Snidal (2000), The Concept of Legalization, International Organization 54(3): pp. 401-419. Michael J. Gilligan and Leslie Johns (2012), Formal Models of International Institutions, Annual Review of Political Science 15: pp. 1-23. Alexander Wendt (2001), Driving with the Rearview Mirror: On the Rational Science of Institutional Design, International Organization 55(4): pp. 1019-50. v.1 12
Abbott, Kenneth W., Jessica F. Green, and Robert O. Keohane (2016), Organizational Ecology and Institutional Change in Global Governance. International Organization 70(2): pp. 247 277. Martha Finnemore and Stephen J. Toope (2001), Alternatives to Legalization : Richer Views of Law and Politics, International Organization 55(3): pp. 743-758. Beth Simmons (1998), Compliance with International Agreements. Annual Review of Political Science 1: pp. 75-93. Nancy Kokaz (2005), Theorizing International Fairness, Metaphilosophy, 36(1-2): pp. 68-92. Barbara Koremenos (2005), Contracting Around International Uncertainty, American Political Science Review 99(4): pp. 549-565. Judith Kelley (2007), Who Keeps International Commitments and Why? The International Criminal Court and Bilateral Nonsurrender Agreements, American Political Science Review 101: pp. 573-589. Seminar 6. The United Nations Ian Hurd (2017), International Organizations: Politics, Law, Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chapter 5. Ian Hurd (2007), After Anarchy; Legitimacy and Power in the United National Security Council. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chapters 1, 2, 4 and 7. Ian Hurd (2008), Myths of Membership: The Politics of Legitimation in UN Security Council Reform, Global Governance 14(2): pp. 199-217. Thomas G. Weiss (2003), The Illusion of Security Council Reform, The Washington Quarterly 26(4): pp. 147-61; Vincent Pouliot and Jean-Philippe Thérien (2015), The Politics of Inclusion: Changing Patterns in the Governance of International Security, Review of International Studies 41(2): pp. 211-237. Bruce Cronin (2002), The Two Faces of the United Nations: Between Intergovernmentalism and Transnational, Global Governance 8(1): pp. 53-71. v.1 13
Seminar 7. Intervention, Peacekeeping, and R2P Gareth Evans and Mohamed Sahnoun (2002), The Responsibility to Protect. Foreign Affairs 81(6): pp. 99-110. Ian Hurd (2007), After Anarchy; Legitimacy and Power in the United National Security Council. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chapter 6. Michael Barnett and Martha Finnemore (2004). Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Chapter 5. Simon Chesterman (2011), Leading from Behind : The Responsibility to Protect, the Obama Doctrine, and Humanitarian Intervention After Libya, Ethics and International Affairs: pp. 279-285. Rebecca Adler-Nissen and Vincent Pouliot (2014), Power in Practice: Negotiating the International Intervention in Libya, European Journal of International Relations 20(4): pp. 889-911. Alex J. Bellamy (2011), The New Politics of Protection? Côte d Ivoire, Libya and the Responsibility to Protect, International Affairs 87(4): pp. 825-850. Dembinski, Mattias and Berenike Schott (2014), Regional security arrangements as a filter for norm diffusion: the African Union, the European Union and the responsibility to protect Cambridge Review of International Studies 27 (2): pp. 362-380. Evans, Gareth (2008), The Responsibility to Protect: An Idea Whose Time has Come... and Gone? International Relations 22(3): pp. 283-298. Alex J. Bellamy (2011), The New Politics of Protection? Côte d Ivoire, Libya and the Responsibility to Protect, International Affairs 87(4): pp. 825-850. Jennifer Welsh (2011), Civilian Protection in Libya: Putting Coercion and Controversy Back into RtoP, Ethics and International Affairs: pp. 255-262. Ian Hurd (2006), The Strategic Use of Liberal Internationalism: Libya and the UN Sanctions, 1992-2003 International Organization 59(3): pp. 495-526. Virginia Page Fortna (2008), Does Peacekeeping Work? Shaping Belligerents Choices after Civil War. Princeton: Princeton University Press. v.1 14
Seminar 8. Regions, Regional Organizations, and Europe Andrew Hurrell (2007), One world? Many worlds? The Place of Regions in the Study of International Society International Affairs 83(1): pp. 1270-146. Ian Hurd (2017) International Organizations: Politics, Law, Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chapter 10. George Tsebelis and Geoffrey Garrett (2011), The Institutional Foundations of Intergovernmentalism and Supranationalism in the European Union, International Organization 55(2): pp. 357-390. Thomas Risse and Daniela Engelmann-Martin (2002), Identity Politics and European Integration: The Case of Germany. In Anthony Pagden (ed.), The Idea of Europe: from Antiquity to The European Union. New York: Cambridge University Press: pp. 287-316. Jeffrey T. Checkel (2001), Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change International Organization 55(3): pp. 553-588. Louise Fawcett and Anderw Hurrell (eds.) (1995), Regionalism in World Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Andrew Hurrell (1995), Explaining the Resurgence of Regionalism in World Politics. Review of International Studies 21(4): pp. 331-358. Barry Buzan and Ole Wæver (2003), Regions and Powers: The structure of international security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Emmanuel Adler and Michael Barnett (eds.) (1998), Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Corneliu Bjola and Markus Kornprobst (2007) Security Communities and the Habitus of Restraint: Germany and the United States on Iraq Review of International Studies 33: pp. 285 305. Anthony Pagden (ed.) (2002), The Idea of Europe: from Antiquity to The European Union. New York: Cambridge University Press. Frank Schimmelfennig (2001), The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union International Organization 55(1): pp. 47-80. Kathleen R. McNamara (2015), The Politics of Everyday Europe: Constructing Authority in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press. v.1 15
Andrew Moravcsik (2002), In Defense of the Democratic Deficit: Reassessing Legitimacy in the European Union The Journal of Common Market Studies 40(4): pp. 603-624. Seminar 9. Writing Workshop I. Details to follow Seminar 10. Writing Workshop II. Details to follow Seminar 11. The Association of Southeast Asian Nations Alice D. Ba (2009) (Re)Negotiating East and Southeast Asia: Region, Regionalism, and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Chapters 1-3. David Martin Jones and Michael L. R. Smith (2007), Making process, not progress: ASEAN and the evolving East Asian Regional Order International Security 32(1): pp. 148 184. Aarie Glas (2017), Habits of Peace: Long-Term Regional Cooperation in Southeast Asia. European Journal of International Relations 23(4): pp. 833-856. Mark Beeson (2009) Institutions of the Asia Pacific: ASEAN, APEC and Beyond. New York, NY: Routledge. Pavin Chachavalpongpun (2013), Thai Cambodian conflict: The failure of ASEAN s dispute settlement mechanisms Asian Journal of Peacebuilding 1(1): pp. 65 86. Alice D. Ba (2006), Who is socializing whom? The Pacific Review 19(2): pp. 157 179. Alice D. Ba (2009) (Re)Negotiating East and Southeast Asia: Region, Regionalism, and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Alice D. Ba (2013) The Association of Southeast Asian Nations: Between internal and external legitimacy In: Zaum D (ed.) Legitimating International Organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press: pp. 132 161. v.1 16
Jürgen Haacke (2003), ASEAN s Diplomatic and Security Culture. New York, NY: RoutledgeCurzon. Amitav Acharya (2001), Constructing A Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order, New York: Routledge. Amitav Acharya (2004), How ideas spread: Whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism International Organization 58(2): pp. 239 275. Alan Collins (2013), Building a People-Oriented Security Community the ASEAN Way. New York, NY: Routledge. Alan Collins (2014), Bringing communities back: Security communities and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations plural turn Cooperation and Conflict 49(2): pp. 276 291. Seminar 12. The African Union Alex D. Vines (2013), A decade of African Peace and Security Architecture, International Affairs 89(1): pp. 89-109. Paul D. Williams (2007), From Non-Intervention to Non-Indifference: the origins and development of the African Union s security culture, African Affairs 106(423): pp. 253-279. Matle Brosig (2013), Introduction: The African Security Regime Complex Exploring Converging Actors and Policies African Security 6: 171-190. Paul D. Williams (2008), Keeping the Peace in Africa: Why African Solutions Are Not Enough. Ethics & International Affairs 22(3): pp. 309-29. Danielle Beswick (2010), Peacekeeping, Regime Security and African Solutions to African Problems : Exploring Motivations for Rwanda s Involvement in Darfur. Third World Quarterly 31(5): pp. 739-54. Ulf Engel and Joã Gomes Porto (eds.) (2010), Africa s New Peace and Security Architecture: Promoting Norms, Institutionalising Solutions. Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 1-12. Franke, Benedikt (2008), Africa s Evolving Security Architecture and the Concept of Multilayered Security Communities, Cooperation and Conflict 43 (3): 313 340. v.1 17
Franke, Benedikt and Stefan Gänzle (2012), How African Is the African Peace and Security Architecture? Conceptual and Practical Constraints of Regional Security Cooperation in Africa African Security 5 (2): 88-104. Paul D. Williams (2009) The Peace and Security Council of the African Union: Evaluating an embryonic international institution, Journal of Modern African Studies, 47(4): pp. 603-26. Paul D. Williams (2011) The African Union s conflict management capabilities. New York: Council on Foreign Relations. Tieku, Thomas Kwasi (2004), Explaining the Clash and Accommodation of Interests of Major Actors in the Creation of the African Union, African Affairs 103(411): pp. 249-67. Murithi, Tim (2009), The African Union s Transition from Non-Intervention to Non- Indifference: An Ad hoc Approach to the Responsibility to Protect?, International Politics and Society, 1: 90-108. PART III. Beyond & Below States Seminar 13. International Non-Governmental Organizations Margaret Keck and Katheryn Sikkink (1998), Activists Beyond Borders. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Chapters 1, 4, 5, & 6. Ole Jacob Sending and Iver B. Neumann (2006), Governance to Governmentality: Analyzing NGOs, States, and Power, International Studies Quarterly 50: pp. 651-672. Gereffi, Gary, Ronie Garcia-Johnson, and Erika Sasser (2001), The NGO-Industrial Complex. Foreign Policy: pp. 56-65. Charlie Carpenter (2007), Setting the Advocacy Agenda: Theorizing Issue Emergence and Non-Emergence in Transnational Advocacy Networks International Studies Quarterly 51: pp. 99-120. Peter M. Haas (1992), Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination, International Organization, 46: pp. 1-35. Manuel Castells (2012), Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. London: Polity. v.1 18
Sarah S. Stroup (2012), Borders among Activists: International NGOs in the United States, Britain, and France. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Jackie Smith Charles Chatfield, and Ron Pagnucco (1997), Transnational Social Movements and Global Politics: Solidarity beyond the state. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press. Wendy H. Wong (2012), Internal Affairs: How the Structure of NGOs Transforms Human Rights. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Thomas Risse, Stephen C. Ropp, and Kathryn Sikkink (eds.) (1999), The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. New York: Cambridge University Press. Doug McAdams, Sidney Tarrow and Charles Tilly (2001), Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Clifford Bob (2012), The Global Right Wing and the Clash of World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Seminar 14. Global Civil Society & Towards a World Government (?) Ronnie Lipschutz (1992), Reconstructing World Politics: The Emergence of Global Civil Society, Millennium, 21(3): pp. 389-420. Jaeger, Hans-Martin (2007), Global Civil Society and the Political Depoliticization of Global Governance International Political Sociology 1: pp. 257-277. Thomas Weiss (1999), What Happened to the Idea of World Government, International Studies Quarterly, 53(2): pp. 253-271. Alexander Wendt (2003), Why a World State is Inevitable, European Journal of International Relations Theory, 9(4): pp. 491-542. John G. Ruggie (1993), Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations, International Organization 46(1): pp. 139 74. Philip G. Cerny (2010). Institutional Bricolage and Global Governmentality: From Infrastructure to Superstructure, In Philip Cerny (ed.), Rethinking World Politics: A Theory of Transnational Neopluralism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Jens Steffek (2010), Public Accountability and the Public Sphere of International Governance Ethics & International Affairs 24(1): pp. 45-68. v.1 19
Richard Price (1998), Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines International Organization 52: pp. 613-644. Clay Shirky (2011), The Political Power of Social Media: Technology, The Public Sphere, and Political Change. Foreign Affairs 90: pp. 28-41. John Keane (2010), Global Civil Society? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Elisabeth Jay Friedman, Kathryn Hochstetler, Ann Marie Clark (2005), Sovereignty, Democracy, and Global Civil Society State-Society Relations at UN World Conferences in Global Politics, New York: SUNY Press. Richard Price (2003), Transnational Civil Society and Advocacy in World Politics World Politics 55: pp. 579-606. v.1 20