Briefing Paper Pakistan Floods 2010: Country Aid Factsheet

Similar documents
Executive summary 3. Visual summary 5. Figure 1: Top 20 government contributors of international humanitarian aid,

chapter 3 donors: who gives assistance?

Contributions to UNHCR For Budget Year 2014 As at 31 December 2014

January final ODA data for an initial analysis of key points. factsheet

Where does the funding come from? 11 International governments 11 National governments 19 Private contributions 19

Global Humanitarian Assistance. Korea 대한민국

SLOW PACE OF RESETTLEMENT LEAVES WORLD S REFUGEES WITHOUT ANSWERS

AUSTRALIA S REFUGEE RESPONSE NOT THE MOST GENEROUS BUT IN TOP 25

Translation from Norwegian

2016 (received) Local Local Local Local currency. currency (millions) currency. (millions)

2013 (received) 2015 (received) Local Local Local Local currency. currency (millions) currency. (millions)

The National Police Immigration Service (NPIS) forcibly returned 412 persons in December 2017, and 166 of these were convicted offenders.

GLOBAL RISKS OF CONCERN TO BUSINESS WEF EXECUTIVE OPINION SURVEY RESULTS SEPTEMBER 2017

2018 Social Progress Index

Asylum Levels and Trends in Industrialized Countries. First Quarter, 2005

2015 (received) 2016 (received) 2017 (received) Local Local Local Local currency. currency. currency (millions) (millions)

UNDER EMBARGO UNTIL 9 APRIL 2018, 15:00 HOURS PARIS TIME

World Refugee Survey, 2001

China s Aid Approaches in the Changing International Aid Architecture

The National Police Immigration Service (NPIS) returned 444 persons in August 2018, and 154 of these were convicted offenders.

Middle School Level. Middle School Section I

ARABPLAST 2019 FACT SHEET

Aid to gender equality and women s empowerment AN OVERVIEW

GUIDELINE OF COMMITTEES IN TASHKENT MODEL UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE 2019

The Multidimensional Financial Inclusion MIFI 1

SCALE OF ASSESSMENT OF MEMBERS' CONTRIBUTIONS FOR 1994

LIST OF CHINESE EMBASSIES OVERSEAS Extracted from Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People s Republic of China *

Collective Intelligence Daudi Were, Project

Central African Republic

Proposed Indicative Scale of Contributions for 2016 and 2017

Return of convicted offenders

ASYLUM IN THE EU Source: Eurostat 4/6/2013, unless otherwise indicated ASYLUM APPLICATIONS IN THE EU27

Delays in the registration process may mean that the real figure is higher.

Launch of the UK Built Environment Advisory Group

The NPIS is responsible for forcibly returning those who are not entitled to stay in Norway.

The National Police Immigration Service (NPIS) forcibly returned 375 persons in March 2018, and 136 of these were convicted offenders.

CHAPTER I: SIZE AND GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION OF THE POPULATION

DELIVERY. Channels and implementers CHAPTER

Country pairings for the second cycle of the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption

FOreword 2. Executive summary 3. chapter 1: Humanitarian response to crises 9. Where does the funding come from? 11

chapter 1 people and crisis

Human Resources in R&D

UNFPA/NIDI Resource Flows Newsletter, December 2011

Aid spending by Development Assistance Committee donors in 2015

LIST OF CONTRACTING STATES AND OTHER SIGNATORIES OF THE CONVENTION (as of January 11, 2018)

Refugee migration 2: Data analysis

Global Prevalence of Adult Overweight & Obesity by Region

UNDER EMBARGO UNTIL 10 APRIL 2019, 15:00 HOURS PARIS TIME. Development aid drops in 2018, especially to neediest countries

Contracting Parties to the Ramsar Convention

On aid orphans and darlings (Aid Effectiveness in aid allocation by respective donor type)

UNITED NATIONS FINANCIAL PRESENTATION. UN Cash Position. 18 May 2007 (brought forward) Alicia Barcena Under Secretary-General for Management

Comparing the Wealth of Nations. Emily Lin

Official development assistance of the Czech Republic (mil. USD) (according to the OECD DAC Statistical Reporting )

Hilde C. Bjørnland. BI Norwegian Business School. Advisory Panel on Macroeconomic Models and Methods Oslo, 27 November 2018

India, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Nepal and Sri Lanka: Korea (for vaccine product only):

Summary of the Results

Mapping physical therapy research

Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption: country pairings for the second review cycle

REPORT OF THE FOURTH SPECIAL SESSION OF THE CONFERENCE OF THE STATES PARTIES

A Partial Solution. To the Fundamental Problem of Causal Inference

PROTOCOL RELATING TO AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ARTICLE 45, SIGNED AT MONTREAL ON 14 JUNE parties.

Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption: country pairings for the second review cycle

Tourism Highlights International Tourist Arrivals, Average Length of Stay, Hotels Occupancy & Tourism Receipts Years

Figure 2: Range of scores, Global Gender Gap Index and subindexes, 2016

HUMAN RESOURCES IN R&D

UNHCR Global Resettlement Statistical Report 2014

Regional Scores. African countries Press Freedom Ratings 2001

2017 Social Progress Index

Fighting Hunger Worldwide WFP-EU PARTNERSHIP

WHY SHOULD I STUDY ENGLISH?

Czech Republic Development Cooperation in 2014

I N T R O D U C T I O N

The Conference Board Total Economy Database Summary Tables November 2016

Asylum Levels and Trends: Europe and non-european Industrialized Countries, 2003

Statistical Appendix 2 for Chapter 2 of World Happiness Report March 1, 2018

Country pairings for the first review cycle of the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption

Country pairings for the second review cycle of the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption

CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL INTERESTS IN MOBILE EQUIPMENT SIGNED AT CAPE TOWN ON 16 NOVEMBER 2001

SEVERANCE PAY POLICIES AROUND THE WORLD

The World s Most Generous Countries

Diplomatic Conference to Conclude a Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works by Visually Impaired Persons and Persons with Print Disabilities

In this issue Summar y 1 CERF in Aid flows 3 Update on Sri Lanka, Mongolia, Nepal and Indonesia 4-5 OCHA Activities 6. Moving from 2010 to 2011

Geoterm and Symbol Definition Sentence. consumption. developed country. developing country. gross domestic product (GDP) per capita

Country pairings for the first cycle of the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption

Country Participation

chapter 3 donors public and private providers

VACATION AND OTHER LEAVE POLICIES AROUND THE WORLD

ASYLUM STATISTICS MONTHLY REPORT

WSDC 2010: THE DRAW ROUND ZERO. PROPOSITION versus OPPOSITION NIGERIA CYPRUS CROATIA BULGARIA LEBANON PALESTINE BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA RUSSIA

VISA POLICY OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN

International Travel Safety Tips in conjunction with SF State Campus Safety Week April 17-20, 2017

World Peace Index Its Significance and Contribution to the Scientific Study of World Peace

Statistics to the end of September 2017

World Heritage UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION

Financing of the United Nations peacekeeping forces in the Middle East: United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon

KINGDOM OF CAMBODIA NATION RELIGION KING 3 TOURISM STATISTICS REPORT. September 2010

Doing Business in East Asia and the Pacific

Table of country-specific HIV/AIDS estimates and data, end 2001

AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL REPORT 1997

Countries for which a visa is required to enter Colombia

Transcription:

August 2010 Briefing Paper Pakistan Floods 2010: Country Aid Factsheet Pakistan is in the grips of a major natural disaster with severe flooding affecting an estimated three million people. As the government and international community attempts to provide first response, measure the impact and count the costs of meeting humanitarian needs, the GHA programme reflects on Pakistan s recent history as an aid recipient. Indicator Result Global ranking Population 173 million HDI Rank 0.572 141/182 GDP per Capita (2007) US$2,496 132/184 Population below income poverty line % (2000-2007) less than US$2 a day Sources: Human Development Report, United Nations, Transparency International 60.3 63/100 Life expectancy (2007) 66.2 118/194 Probability of not living until 40 13% 61/183 Pakistan has significant development challenges, ranked amongst the medium development countries in UNDP s Human Development Index (HDI) but with 60% of the large population of 173 million people living on less than US$2 a day. Pakistan a major aid beneficiary receiving US$1.5 billion in official development assistance (ODA) and ranking as the 14 th largest global recipient of aid in 2008. Pakistan is prone to natural disasters and has already suffered a series of major events in the last five years, especially in 2005 when severe and flooding affected seven million people and an additional five million were affected by the Kashmir earthquake. Pakistan is also affected by regional and domestic instability and is ranked towards the bottom of the Global Peace Index at 145 out of 149 in 2010. Military offensives against militants in north-west Pakistan in 2009 rapidly displaced more than two million people. Pakistan also hosts one of the world s largest refugee populations, 1.7 million people mostly from Afghanistan. Pakistan has received significant volumes of humanitarian assistance in response to specific disasters, including US$576 million following the flooding and Kashmir earthquake in 2005, and a further US$465 million in 2006 as humanitarian needs in Kashmir continued. In 2008 Pakistan was the 16 th largest global recipient of humanitarian aid.

Aid to Pakistan, 1995-2008 In 2008 Pakistan received US$1.5 billion in ODA, its lowest level since 2003 and a 34% drop from the previous year s US$2.3 billion. In 2001 contributions rose sharply, up 195% from 2000, reflecting a convergence of global interest in the region following the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001. Humanitarian aid contributions to Pakistan respond to natural disaster events. In 2005 Pakistan received substantial humanitarian aid, US$576 million (which made up 31% of ODA) in response to the earthquake and floods which affected 12 million people. Humanitarian aid to Pakistan declined between 2006 and 2008 but remains significantly higher than in any year preceding the 2005 peak. US$ million (constant 2008) 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 1995: flash floods 1996: floods 1998 floods 2001: Musharraf becomes President and supports US in fight against terrorism 2001: Earthquake and flood - 1.3 million affected 2000: drought 2002: Earthquake - 140,000 affected 2004: Earthquake October 2005: Earthquake- 5.1 million affected Feb 2005: Floods - 7 million affected 2007: Floods and storm - 1.6 million affected 2008: Earthquake and floods - 300,000 affected 500 0 31 26 41 34 37 35 81 69 68 57 576 465 248 178 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Humanitarian aid Non humanitarian aid ODA Source: OECD DAC (all donors) EM-DAT CRED

ODA to Pakistan compared to other recipient countries, 2008 In absolute terms, Pakistan ranked as the 14 th largest recipient of ODA in 2008, having received US$1.5 billion. Pakistan s ODA per capita in 2008 amounted to US$9.2, placing it 101 st amongst countries with more than half million inhabitants. Amongst the countries receiving more aid per capita than Pakistan were other states high on the political priority list of major donor countries - the occupied Palestinian territory, Iraq and Afghanistan. Note: Our method of calculation of ODA per capita excludes all countries with less than half a million population. The very small population figures seriously distort the analysis per capita. In 2008 14 out of the top 15 recipients of ODA per capita were small island sates. Recipient Total ODA, 2008 (US$m) Ranking per total ODA ODA per capita, Ranking per 2008 (US$m) capita Iraq 9880.2 1 333.7 5 Afghanistan 4865.1 2 172.2 12 Ethiopia 3327.5 3 39.0 66 occupied Palestinian territory (OPT) 2592.8 4 624.7 1 Viet Nam 2551.8 5 28.8 45 Sudan 2383.6 6 60.3 46 Tanzania 2330.7 7 56.1 50 India 2107.7 8 1.8 116 Bangladesh 2061.4 9 12.8 94 Turkey 2023.7 10 26.7 79 Mozambique 1993.8 11 91.5 28 Uganda 1656.8 12 51.8 54 Congo, Dem. Rep. 1648.3 13 25.4 80 Pakistan 1539.4 14 9.2 101 China 1488.9 15 1.1 119 Kenya 1360.4 16 35.2 70 Egypt 1348.4 17 17.5 87 Ghana 1293.3 18 54.0 51 Nigeria 1289.8 19 8.5 105 Liberia 1250.4 20 315.5 6 Source: OECD DAC, all donors

Donor funding to Pakistan by sector, 2008 Almost a third of all aid committed by donors in 2008 was for activities promoting the health, well-being and education of the population. By far the largest proportion of Pakistan s aid is channelled to a range of activities encouraging economic growth. Development food aid 0.1% Other 0.4% Humanitarian aid 6.0% Education 8.5% Health 6.4% Population and reproductive health 10.1% Water and sanitation 3.0% Multisector-cross cutting 2.0% Industry, mining, construction and other productive services 1.7% General budget support 7.7% Agriculture, forestry, fishing 6.1% Economic infrastructure and services 36.6% Government and civil society 7.7% Other social infrastructure and services 3.7% Source: OECD DAC, all donor commitments 2008

Top humanitarian donors 1995-2008 In 2008 the top five humanitarian donors to Pakistan were the United States (US), the European Commission (EC), Australia, the United Kingdom (UK) and Canada. These donors provided 79% of total DAC donor humanitarian aid in that year. The US alone contributed 35% of the total DAC donor humanitarian aid in 2008 however its overall contributions had fallen by 67% since 2006. Over the period 1995-2008 the top 5 donors of humanitarian aid were the US, Turkey, the EC, Norway and the UK. Disbursements from these donors remained more or less constant until 2005 when large amounts of humanitarian aid were given by Turkey, US$165 million and Norway, US$100 million. The sharp increase in aid corresponds with the major earthquake and floods in 2005 Top 10 humanitarian donors to Pakistan 07-08 (constant prices) 2007 US$ m 2008 US$ m United States 94.54 United States 49.08 France 53.38 EC 25.09 EC 36.29 Australia 16.66 Germany 8.97 United Kingdom 13.46 Finland 7.39 Canada 8.14 Switzerland 5.37 Japan 7.14 Australia 5.19 Germany 4.54 United Kingdom 4.72 Switzerland 4.07 Canada 3.85 Sweden 3.78 Sweden 2.95 Turkey 2.68 US$ million 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0-50 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 United States Turkey EC Norway United Kingdom Total DAC donors Source: OECD DAC

Top non-dac humanitarian donors 1995-2008 In 2009 the UAE was the most generous non-dac donor donating US$30 million to Pakistan, the majority of which went through UN agencies. In 2005 Turkey was the most generous non-dac donor, reporting US$66 million to Pakistan, of which US$25 million was channel bilaterally to the Pakistan government. Note: Contributions reported through the FTS are voluntary so do not capture all humanitarian aid flows from non-dac donors. Some donors, such as Turkey, also report voluntarily to the OECD DAC;. For example, in 2005 it reported over US$160 million in total humanitarian aid to Pakistan Top 5 non-dac donors to Pakistan 2008-2009 2008 US$ m 2009 US$ m Saudi Arabia 1.9 UAE 30 Korea 0.1 Saudi Arabia 2.4 - Oman 2 - Russia 1 - Korea 0.7 70 60 US$ millions 50 40 30 20 10 Turkey Saudi Arabia (Kingdom of) United Arab Emirates Kyrgyzstan Qatar 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: UN OCHA FTS

Humanitarian aid to Pakistan compared to other recipient countries, 2008 Pakistan was 16 th largest recipient of humanitarian assistance in 2008, higher that China (ranked 23 rd ) and India (32 nd ) which both suffered natural disasters in that year. Recipient US$m Ranking Sudan 1399.9 1 Afghanistan 870.7 2 Ethiopia 840.3 3 Palestinian Adm. Areas 799.1 4 Somalia 566.5 5 Congo, Dem. Rep. 548.5 6 Iraq 394.8 7 Myanmar 365.7 8 Zimbabwe 333.5 9 Kenya 306.1 10 Lebanon 254.4 11 Sri Lanka 246.6 12 Chad 244.3 13 Uganda 244.1 14 Haiti 206.2 15 Pakistan 178.3 16 Jordan 150.8 17 Bangladesh 141.6 18 Indonesia 137.4 19 Korea, Dem. Rep. 109.2 20 US$ million Contributions to Pakistan via the Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF) Between 2007 and 2008, CERF contributions to Pakistan increased by 222% from US$5.8 million in 2007 to US$18.7 million in 2008. In 2008 Pakistan was the 5 th largest recipient of CERF funds. In 2009 CERF contributions to Pakistan dropped to US$8.9 million ranking Pakistan 12 th 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 5.8 18.7 8.9 2007 2008 2009 Sources: OECD DAC (all donors) and CERF

Spain Luxembourg Ireland Finland Estonia Azerbaijan Sri Lanka Korea, republic of Denmark France Czech Republic Switzerland Sweden Belgium UAE Turkey Norway Kuwait Germany The Netherlands Thailand New Zealand Greece Italy UK Japan Canada China US Australia 0.9 0.3 0.3 1.6 0.1 1.0 0.02 0.5 1.4 0.2 1.7 3.0 0.7 1.52 0.3 3.3 0.2 0.4 1.3 0.1 1.5 0.1 3.3 1.8 3.2 1.9 1.5 5.0 9.0 10.7 Donor response to the 2010 Pakistan floods In August 2010 the United Nations launched an appeal in response to the floods in Pakistan with an original request for US$459 million. At the time of writing, US$92 million has been committed directly to the appeal with an additional US$58 million raised for the emergency. A number of donors have also volunteered pledges and in-kind contributions. Private donations are also beginning to flow with a number of humanitarian agencies, including the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, Islamic Relief, Save the Children UK, the Disasters Emergency Committee, an umbrella organisation of UK based NGOs and UNICEF, launching funding appeals. GHA will continue to monitor and publish data and analysis on the humanitarian funding response to the Pakistan floods emergency. 24.5 38.0 40.2 Sources: OCHA, As of 13 h August 2010 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 US$ million Pledged (US$) Committed (US$)

Clarity Counts. We work to provide access to reliable, transparent and understandable information so that we can all work to ensure better outcomes for people affected by humanitarian crises. Global Humanitarian Assistance is a Development Initiatives programme, funded by the governments of Canada, Denmark, the Netherlands, Sweden and the United Kingdom Email: gha@devinit.org Tel: +44 (0)1749 671343 Web: globalhumanitarianassistance.org Global Humanitarian Assistance, Development Initiatives, Keward Court, Jocelyn Drive, Wells, Somerset, BA5 1DB, UK