Updates Fact Sheet No: September 2015

Similar documents
Chapter 19 Procedures for Disciplinary Action and Appeal

8 NYCRR 83 This document reflects those changes received from the NY Bill Drafting Commission through June 27, 2014

CHAPTER Council Substitute for House Bill No. 1543

Part 3. Principal and Teacher Employment Contracts. 115C-325. System of employment for public school teachers. (a) Definition of Terms.

TENNESSEE CODE ANNOTATED 2012 by The State of Tennessee All rights reserved *** CURRENT THROUGH THE 2011 REGULAR SESSION ***

SAN FRANCISCO EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES AGENCY CERTIFICATE/LICENSE DISCIPLINE PROCESS FOR PREHOSPITAL PERSONNEL

ALABAMA PRIVATE INVESTIGATION BOARD ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 741-X-6 DISCIPLINARY ACTION TABLE OF CONTENTS

16. ABSENT TEACHER RESERVE

CHAPTER House Bill No. 601

Teacher Fair Dismissal Law Effective July 1, 2014

District of Columbia Court of Appeals Board on Professional Responsibility. Board Rules

Social Workers Act CHAPTER 12 OF THE ACTS OF as amended by. 2001, c. 19; 2005, c. 60; 2012, c. 48, s. 40; 2015, c. 52

CUNY BYLAWS ARTICLE XV STUDENTS SECTION PREAMBLE.

CHAPTER 20 RULE DISCIPLINE AND DISABILITY: POLICY JURISDICTION

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA 1997 SESSION S.L SENATE BILL 272. Section 1. This act shall be known as "The Excellent Schools Act".

COURT RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CHAPTER 12 TABLE OF CONTENTS

RULE 10 SUSPENSION, DEMOTION, DISMISSAL

By-Laws of the Panel for Educational Policy of the Department of Education of the City School District of the City of New York PREAMBLE

CHAPTER XIV DISCIPLINARY ACTION AND APPEAL. Rule 14.1 DISCIPLINARY ACTION - SUSPENSION, DEMOTION AND DISMISSAL

[SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) ARE UNCHANGED]

Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Local Rules 33.0 ASSIGNMENT AND COMPENSATION OF COUNSEL TO DEFEND

Board of Certification, Inc. Version Effective September 1, 2016 Updated May 2016

BROOKLYN LAW SCHOOL STUDENT DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES

TITLE 8. EMPLOYMENT CHAPTER 1. EMPLOYEE REVIEW CODE

TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER n: DISPUTE RESOLUTION

(cf Concepts and Roles) (cf / Criminal Record (cf / / Professional Standards)

CHAPTER Law Enforcement Officers' Bill of Rights

PARENT AND CHILD RIGHTS

STATE OF MICHIGAN STATE TENURE COMMISSION TEACHERS' TENURE ACT TABLE OF CONTENTS

NCTA Disciplinary Procedure

Medical Staff Bylaws Part 2: INVESTIGATIONS, CORRECTIVE ACTION, HEARING AND APPEAL PLAN

CORRECTIVE ACTION/DISCIPLINARY-GRIEVANCE ACTION POLICY Volunteer Personnel

AASB BOARDMANSHIP SERIES DEVELOPING EXCELLENT SCHOOL BOARD LEADERS THROUGH

Involuntary Suspension Without Pay, Demotion, Reduction of Pay Step in Class, or Dismissal of Permanent Classified Employees

The objectives of corrective discipline can be stated as follows:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR INDIAN RIVER, MARTIN, OKEECHOBEE, AND ST. LUCIE COUNTIES, STATE OF FLORIDA

OROVILLE UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT. BP 4118 (a) Personnel. Dismissal/Suspension/Disciplinary Action

SUPERINTENDENT'S CONTRACT OF EMPLOYMENT POTTER-DIX PUBLIC SCHOOLS

CHAPTER 75 MERIT SYSTEM COMMISSION

Substitute for HOUSE BILL No. 2159

Title 17-A: MAINE CRIMINAL CODE

Rule Change #2000(20)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 113,928. In the Matter of ELIZABETH ANNE HUEBEN, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

ARTICLE 5.--ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT GENERAL PROVISIONS. K.S.A through shall be known and may be cited as the Kansas

BYLAWS THE MEDICAL STAFF SHAWANO MEDICAL CENTER, INC. VOLUME II CORRECTIVE ACTION PROCEDURES AND FAIR HEARING PLAN ADDENDUM

IBSA Harassment Policy

CORRECTIVE ACTION/FAIR HEARING PLAN FOR HENDRICKS REGIONAL HEALTH DANVILLE, INDIANA

CHAPTER 468L TRAVEL AGENCIES

Rules for Qualified & Court-Appointed Parenting Coordinators

STANDARD NON-CERTIFIED APPLICATION For Non-Certified Positions at Belle Valley Public School District #119

RULE 250. MANDATORY CONTINUING LEGAL AND JUDICIAL EDUCATION

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING

Document XVIII PROCEDURES FOR DISMISSAL FOR CAUSE AND IMPOSITION OF MAJOR SANCTIONS. Introduction

=== IICES. HAMllTON. District Superintendent Hamilton-Fulton-Montgomery BOCES. Application of NAME

APPENDIX E ARC DISCIPLINARY POLICY

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. SENATE, No th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2016 SESSION

DISMISSAL/SUSPENSION/DISCIPLINARY ACTION AR 4118

RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE ALAMEDA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION. CRIMINAL COURT APPOINTED ATTORNEYS PROGRAM (Effective May 1, 2013)

SENATE BILL No. 808 AMENDED IN SENATE APRIL 24, Introduced by Senator Mendoza. February 17, 2017

Title IX Investigation Procedure

IC Version a Chapter 15. Issuance of Restricted Driver's License Because of Hardship

BYLAWS OF THE UNITED STATES SOCCER FEDERATION, INC.

Public Act No

The term of the Collective Bargaining Agreement shall be from February 12, 1996 to March 31, 2001.

CONTRACT OF EMPLOYMENT WITH SUPERINTENDENT

Response to Issues Identified

RULES FOR KAISER PERMANENTE MEMBER ARBITRATIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE OFFICE OF THE INDEPENDENT ADMINISTRATOR

RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES DIVISION CHAPTER FAIR HEARING REQUESTS TABLE OF CONTENTS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 117,607. In the Matter of MATTHEW B. WORKS, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

ENROLLED HOUSE BILL No. 4928

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1 Article 45C 1

CHAPTER 11 1 DISCIPLINARY ACTION AND APPEALS, DISMISSALS, SUSPENSION AND DEMOTION

ATTORNEY HANDBOOK. State Bar of California Certified Lawyer Referral Service #134

Cobb County Emergency Management Agency David Hankerson, Director Cassie Reece, Deputy Director

Uniform Arbitration Act; Mediation or Arbitration of Trust Instruments; HB 2571

KANAWHA COUNTY SCHOOLS POLICY

IC Chapter 5. Operating a Vehicle While Intoxicated

**Applicants must submit a copy of their diploma or transcript before receiving consideration for training.**

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Enrolled

Huron-Perth Catholic District School Board

CHAPTER House Bill No. 815

Alameda Unified School Distrt Director of Student Services RECOMMENDED CHARTER TEXT

REINSTATEMENT QUESTIONNAIRE. To facilitate the processing of Petitions for Reinstatement to practice law the

BY - LAW S VIRGIN ISLANDS SOCIETY OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS ARTICLE I - OFFICES

Mineral County Schools Bylaws & Policies

California Code of Ethics and

TITLE XXX OCCUPATIONS AND PROFESSIONS

RULE 19 APPEALS TO THE CAREER SERVICE HEARING OFFICE (Effective January 10, 2018; Rule Revision Memo 33D)

IC Chapter 9. Health Professions Standards of Practice

NORWICH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT

RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THECOLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO INDEX

HOUSE BILL NO. HB0094. Sponsored by: Joint Judiciary Interim Committee A BILL. for. AN ACT relating to criminal justice; amending provisions

Illinois Surgical Assistant Law

ALABAMA SURFACE MINING COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE CODE

The Supreme Court of South Carolina

Effective January 1, 2016

AGREEMENT. Between. BRANT COUNTY ROMAN CATHOLIC SEPARATE SCHOOL BOARD (hereinafter called the "Board") OF THE FIRST PART. And

A POLICY AND PROCEDURE FOR MINISTERIAL AND STAFF MISCONDUCT. an MCEC Policy Adopted 02, 20, 2002 Revised September 30, 2008

ADMINISTRATOR S MULTI-YEAR CONTRACT OF EMPLOYMENT ( ) THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 9th day of March, 2015, by and

WILDHORSE RANCH COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION BYLAWS

Transcription:

Updates Fact Sheet No: 15-15 September 2015 C hapter 56 of the Laws of 2015 includes a number of amendments to New York State (NYS) Education Law that address teacher preparation and certification, tenure, annual professional performance reviews (APPR), testing reduction, school receivership, and teacher removal. This NYSUT Fact Sheet will provide an overview of the specific changes affecting teacher tenure and removal. Table of Contents Summary of Tenure Changes... 2 Questions & Answers Regarding Tenure... 2 Summary of Changes in the Tenured Teacher Removal Process... 4 Questions & Answers Regarding Teacher Removal... 5 NYS is widely recognized for its exemplary Advice to Local Leaders... 10 teaching force and has earned high marks Resources... 10 for its rigorous standards and credentialing requirements typically ranking among the nation s top ten 1. Tenure is just one of the safeguards NYS has put in place to ensure every student has an effective teacher. A teacher must earn tenure after successfully completing a probationary period of effective teaching, oversight and evaluation. A tenured teacher then is entitled to a fair hearing before being dismissed a basic right to due process. Tenure also provides teachers freedom to advocate for their students without fear of reprisal. Because tenure exists, teachers in NYS can speak out freely on issues such as over-testing; cuts in academic programs; elimination of art, music, foreign language and other programs; and inappropriate programs and services for students with disabilities. Without tenure, working under the constant threat of arbitrary firing would have a chilling effect on a teacher s professional judgment and create an environment that would erode, not enhance, educational quality. This NYSUT Fact Sheet contains: A summary of the recent changes to tenure; Frequently asked questions and answers regarding tenure; A summary of changes to the teacher removal process; Frequently asked questions and answers regarding teacher removal; Advice to local leaders on this topic; and Additional resources 1 Education Week, Quality Counts 2012.

Summary of Tenure Changes The new requirement begins with those teachers appointed on or after July 1, 2015. The mandated changes to tenure enacted by Chapter 56 in 2015 specifically tie the granting of tenure to 3012-c and 3012-d of NYS s Education Law regarding teacher and principal evaluation law. The probationary period is extended from three to four years for untenured teachers. Boards of Education will no longer be able to specify an end date to the probationary period and teachers will be notified at their appointment that tenure will depend on their APPR ratings. A teacher seeking tenure would need to attain an effective or highly effective rating for at least three of the four years. These ratings do not need to be consecutive. A teacher rated ineffective in the fourth year cannot receive tenure at that time. A Board of Education can agree to extend the probationary period an additional year (thus offering a fifth probationary year). The law does not prohibit additional years of probation. A tenured teacher in a school district or BOCES who obtains employment in another district will now have a three year probationary period, provided the teacher did not receive an ineffective in their last year at the prior school. School boards will be able to terminate probationary teachers without regard to their Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) rating. Questions & Answers Regarding Tenure Q: What is tenure? A: Tenure is simply a statutory right to due process that was first enacted for New York City teachers in 1897 and expanded to cover Union Free School districts in 1937. Teachers were uniquely vulnerable in a public school setting. There were few, if any policies in place to protect teachers from being fired. Without job protection, teachers could be fired for literally any reason. Race, faith, gender and favoritism were some of the most common reasons for firing teachers before 1885, as was their political affiliation. Women could even be fired for becoming pregnant. Teacher unions in NYS did not negotiate the tenure laws. Tenure law was established in State Education Law decades before teachers unions were recognized in NYS. In 1945, tenure law was amended to extend basic due process rights to all public school teachers. The tenure law has been amended several times in the last 40 years. Q: Who is covered by the new tenure law and when does it begin? A: The four-year probation in Chapter 56 applies to all classroom teachers, building principals, all other members of the teaching and supervisory staff, teaching assistants, and pupil personnel services providers appointed by a Board of Education on or after July 1, 2015. The linkage between the APPR and granting or denying tenure only applies to classroom teachers and building principals. Section 30.-1.3 of the Regulations define classroom teacher as a teacher in the classroom teaching service as defined in 80-1.1 of the Regulations: Classroom teaching service means teaching service in the public schools of New York State, which requires certification pursuant to this Part (80), excluding pupil personnel service or administrative and supervisory service. Teacher aides are not covered under the new tenure law. 2

Pupil personnel service providers are not included in the definition of the classroom teaching service. Section 80-1.1(b)(30) of the Regulations defines pupil personnel services providers to mean school psychologists, school counselors and school social workers. For Example: 1. If you were appointed by a board of education on or before June 30, 2015 with a September 1, 2015 start date, you would have a three year probationary period. 2. If you were appointed by a board of education on or after July1, 2015 with a September 1, 2015 start date, you would have a four year probationary period. Q: What happens if a tenured teacher is appointed to a new tenure area in the same school district? A: The probationary period is now three years instead of two. Q: What happens if a teacher has tenure in one district and obtains employment in another district in NYS? A: The probationary period in the new district is now three years instead of two. Q: What if a teacher has served in a district for at least two years as a regular substitute classroom teacher? A: The new law says that the probationary period would be two years if the teacher received an APPR rating in each of the two years of substitute service. Q. Could boards of education grant tenure after three years (rather than four years) and three effective or highly effective APPR ratings? A: It is not clear. According to Chapter 56, tenure determinations are dependent upon receiving an APPR rating of effective or highly effective in the fourth and final year of probation. However, it could be argued that a school board could grant tenure prior to the fourth year, based on other language in the statutes that was not amended. Q: What happens if a teacher receives an ineffective APPR rating in the fourth and final year of probation? A: The board of education may extend the probationary period for another (fifth) year. If the teacher successfully appeals the ineffective rating, the teacher would be immediately eligible for tenure. The law does not prohibit additional years of probation beyond five. Q: What is 3020-a and how does it relate to Due Process? A: Education Law 3020-a governs the disciplinary procedures of tenured teachers and administrators (except superintendents) and provides due process. Due process consists of the minimum procedural requirements that each public school district must satisfy when dismissing a teacher who has attained tenure. Due process is one of the core foundations of our judicial system. Similar safeguards are in place to ensure police officers, firefighters and other public servants at the state and local levels cannot be arbitrarily dismissed based on allegations alone, or for politically motivated reasons. Due process and tenure are NOT a job protection for life. Q. What are the due process requirements concerning charges of incompetence or misconduct under 3020-a? 3

Charges in writing filed with the school district during the school year. Within five days of receipt of charges, the Board of Education determines if there is probable cause to bring disciplinary proceedings. If yes, a written notice sent to the employee detailing charges, the penalty imposed if employee waives hearing, and the employee s rights, sent by certified or registered mail. The employee may be suspended with pay (there are exceptions, see below). Within 10 days of receipt of charges, the employee will notify the district in writing if they request a hearing. The district will notify the Commissioner within 3 (working) days of the need for a hearing. If the employee waives the hearing, the employing board determines the outcome in 15 days. If the employee demands a hearing, such hearing is held before an impartial hearing officer. Different rules apply to the hearing itself depending upon the nature of the charges. Summary of Changes in the Tenured Teacher Removal Process s to discipline or remove tenured teachers in NYS for alleged incompetency or misconduct are commonly referred to as the 3020-a process, referring to Section 3020-a of Education Law which establishes rights to due process for teachers who have obtained tenure. Chapter 56 of the Laws of 2015 amended Section 3020 and 3020-a and adds a new Section 3020-b. The following changes are effective with regard to charges brought on or after July 1, 2015. Revocation of Teaching Certification Chapter 56 amended Section 305 of Education Law to extend the duty of the Commissioner of Education to revoke the certification of a teacher upon certain criminal convictions. In addition to such automatic license revocation for sex offense convictions, the Commissioner must now also revoke certification of any teacher convicted of a violent felony committed against a child when the child was the intended victim. Disciplinary Procedure Changes s on all charges brought on or after July 1, 2015 will be heard by single hearing officers. At the pre-hearing conference the hearing officer will set a schedule and manner for full and fair disclosure of the witnesses and evidence to be offered by the employee as part of the defense (in addition to discovery to be disclosed by the employer as required by current law). A child witness under the age of fourteen may be permitted to testify through the use of live two-way closed circuit television if the hearing officer determines that the witness would suffer serious mental or emotional harm if required to testify in person. officers must give serious consideration to the penalty recommended by the employing Board. If the penalty is rejected by the hearing officer, the rejection must reflect reasons based upon the record as expressed in a written determination. For charges of physical or sexual abuse of a student: o A teacher charged with physical or sexual abuse of a student will have an expedited hearing by a single hearing officer commenced within seven days after the pre-hearing conference and completed within 60 days after the pre-hearing conference. 4

o A teacher may be suspended without pay when charged with physical or sexual abuse of a student pending an expedited hearing. (This provision does not apply to New York City which has different rules governing suspension without pay in the NYCDOE/UFT contract.) o When a Board of Education decides to suspend a teacher without pay, a probable cause hearing before an impartial hearing officer must be held within ten days to determine whether the decision to suspend without pay should be continued or reversed. Upon a finding that probable cause does not support the charges or suspension without pay is grossly disproportionate in light of all surrounding circumstances, the employee would receive reimbursement of withheld pay with any applicable interest. o Suspension without pay can last no longer than 120 days from the decision of the Board of Education to suspend without pay. o If the hearing officer finds in the employee s favor as a final determination at the conclusion of the expedited hearing, the employee would receive reimbursement of withheld pay with any applicable interest. Streamlined Procedures for Removing Teachers Rated Ineffective Chapter 56 repealed the previously-established expedited hearing process for two consecutive ineffective ratings, and added a new Education Law 3020-b which establishes procedures for expedited hearings for teachers or building principals charged with incompetence after receiving either two or three consecutive ineffective overall APPR ratings under Education Law 3012-c and/or 3012-d. All charges brought on or after July 1, 2015 will be heard by a single hearing officer. Two consecutive ineffective APPR ratings constitute prima facie (Latin for "at first sight ) evidence of incompetence which establishes just cause for removal. In such a case, a district may choose to file a charge of incompetence. Such evidence can only be overcome by clear and convincing evidence that the employee is not incompetent in light of all surrounding circumstances. Three consecutive ineffective APPR ratings constitute prima facie evidence of incompetence which establishes just cause for removal. In such a case, a district must file a charge of incompetence. The evidence of three consecutive ineffective ratings can only be overcome by clear and convincing evidence that the calculation of one or more of the teacher s underlying components of the APPRs was fraudulent. Fraud in this instance shall include mistaken identity. Questions & Answers Regarding Teacher Removal Q: What is the timeline for a 3020-a disciplinary hearing? A: Generally, the process is as follows: ACTION TIMELINE PROCESS Within the period between actual opening and closing of school year. Within three years unless the alleged misconduct constitutes a crime. Filing of Charges Disposition of Charges The BOE votes within five days after receipt of charges. BOE decision whether there is probable cause to move forward with a Filed by Chief School Administrator with the District Clerk. The Clerk notifies Board of Education (BOE) immediately. If affirmative decision, written statement forwarded immediately to employee (by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, or personal delivery) 5

ACTION TIMELINE PROCESS hearing. specifying: Charges in detail; Maximum penalty; and Employee s rights. The employee may be suspended with pay pending a hearing and final determination (suspension without pay may occur if employee has plead guilty or has been convicted of a felony crime concerning sale or possession of a controlled substance, a precursor of a controlled substance, drug paraphernalia, or physical abuse of a minor or student). Within ten days of receipt of charges, Upon receipt of the request for a hearing, employee notifies District Clerk to the Clerk shall notify the State Education request hearing. Department (SED) of the need for a No request indicates that the right to a hearing within three working days. hearing is waived and the BOE will issue a determination within fifteen days. Request Notice of Pre- Conference Decision Appeal SED requests list of hearing officers from American Arbitration Association. Upon receipt, list simultaneously forwarded to both BOE and employee. officer to hold a pre-hearing conference within ten to fifteen days of agreeing to serve. Limited to one day (additional day may be allowed at hearing officer s discretion). The final hearing is completed no later than 60 days after the pre-hearing conference. Written decision within 30 days of the last day of the final hearing. Not later than ten days after receipt of the decision an application may be made to the state Supreme Court to vacate or modify the decision. Within fifteen days after receiving officer list, BOE and employee notify SED of agreed-upon hearing officer. If no agreement, then SED will appoint the officer. Activities to include scheduling of the final hearing, prehearing motions to dismiss, and motions for prehearing discovery. All evidence is submitted by all parties within 125 days of the filing of charges, absent extraordinary circumstances beyond the parties control. Within fifteen days of receipt of the hearing officer s decision, the BOE must implement the decision. The filing or pendency of an appeal does not delay the implementation of the decision. Q: What are the circumstances that can result in an expedited hearing? A: There are four categories of expedited hearings: Expedited hearings upon revocation of a teaching certificate; Expedited hearings on charges of misconduct constituting the physical or sexual abuse of students; Expedited 3020-b hearings based on two consecutive ineffective APPR ratings; and Expedited 3020-b hearings based on three consecutive ineffective APPR ratings. Q: What is the expedited 3020-a timeline for charges arising from the revocation of a teaching certificate? 6

A: The process is as follows with specific expedited timelines highlighted in bold: ACTION TIMELINE PROCESS Within the period between actual opening and closing of school year. Within three years unless the alleged misconduct constitutes a crime. Filing of Charges Disposition of Charges Request Notice of Pre- Conference Decision Appeal The BOE votes within five days after receipt of charges. BOE decision whether there is probably cause to move forward with a hearing. Within ten days of receipt of charges, employee notifies District Clerk to request hearing. No request indicates that the right to a hearing is waived and the BOE will issue a determination within fifteen days. SED requests list of hearing officers from American Arbitration Association. Upon receipt, list simultaneously forwarded to both BOE and employee. officer to hold a pre-hearing conference within ten to fifteen days of agreeing to serve. Limited to one day (additional day may be allowed at officer s discretion). The final hearing takes place within seven days of the pre-hearing conference. The hearing is limited to one day. Written decision within ten days of the last day of the hearing. Not later than ten days after receipt of the decision an application may be made to the state Supreme Court to vacate or modify the decision. Filed by Chief School Administrator with the District Clerk. The Clerk notifies Board of Education (BOE) immediately. If affirmative decision, written statement forwarded immediately to employee (by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, or personal delivery) specifying: Charges in detail Maximum penalty Employee s rights. According to case law, the employee may be suspended without pay pending a hearing and final determination. Upon receipt of the request for a hearing, the Clerk shall notify the State Education Department (SED) of the need for a hearing within three working days. Within fifteen days after receiving officer list, BOE and employee notify SED of agreed-upon hearing officer. If no agreement, then SED will appoint the officer. Activities to include scheduling of the final hearing, prehearing motions to dismiss, and motions for prehearing discovery. Within fifteen days of receipt of the hearing officer s decision, the BOE must implement the decision. The filing or pendency of an appeal does not delay the implementation of the decision. Q: What is the expedited 3020-a timeline for charges involving the physical or sexual abuse of a student? A: The process is as follows with specific expedited timelines highlighted in bold: ACTION TIMELINE PROCESS Within the period between actual opening and closing of school year. Within three years unless the alleged misconduct constitutes a crime. Filing of Charges Filed with the District Clerk. The Clerk notifies Board of Education (BOE) immediately. 7

ACTION TIMELINE PROCESS Disposition of Charges Probable Cause Request Notice of Pre- Conference The BOE votes within five days after receipt of charges. BOE decision to move forward with a hearing based upon probable cause. If BOE decides to suspend without pay, the district notifies SED within one business day to request a probable cause hearing. SED selects the hearing officer from a regional rotational list. Failure to accept the case within 24 hours is deemed a declination. conducted within ten days of suspension to determine whether BOE decision to suspend employee without pay should be continued or reversed. Within ten days of receipt of charges, employee notifies District Clerk to request hearing. No request indicates that the right to a hearing is waived and the BOE will issue a determination within fifteen days. SED requests list of hearing officers from American Arbitration Association. Upon receipt, list simultaneously forwarded to both BOE and employee. officer to hold a pre-hearing conference within ten to fifteen days of agreeing to serve. Limited to one day (additional day may be allowed at officer s discretion). The final hearing begins within seven days of the pre-hearing conference and is completed no later than 60 days after the prehearing conference. If affirmative decision, written statement forwarded immediately to employee (by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, or personal delivery) specifying: Charges in detail Maximum penalty Employee s rights The employee may be suspended without pay pending an expedited hearing and final determination. Grounds for reinstatement of paid status are that probable cause does not support the charges, or suspension without pay is grossly disproportionate in the circumstances. Suspensions without pay shall last no longer than 120 days from the decision of the BOE to suspend the employee. The suspension only relates to employee compensation exclusive of health insurance and other benefits and guarantees. Upon receipt of the request for a hearing, the Clerk shall notify the State Education Department (SED) of the need for a hearing within three working days. Within fifteen days after receiving officer list, BOE and employee notify SED of agreed-upon hearing officer. If no agreement, then SED will appoint the officer. Activities to include scheduling of the final hearing, prehearing motions to dismiss, and motions for prehearing discovery. All evidence is submitted by all parties within 125 days of the filing of charges absent extraordinary circumstances beyond the control of the parties. Decision Appeal Written decision within ten days of the last day of the final hearing. Not later than ten days after receipt of the decision an application may be made to the state Supreme Court to vacate or modify the decision. Within fifteen days of receipt of the hearing officer s decision, the BOE must implement the decision. The filing or pendency of an appeal does not delay the implementation of the decision. 8

Q: What is the streamlined timeline for teachers receiving two consecutive ineffective ratings in the new 3020-b process? A: A school district or employing board may bring charges of incompetence against any classroom teacher or building principal who receives two consecutive ineffective APPR ratings. All such charges brought against a tenured teacher must be in writing specifying: o the charges in detail; o the penalty imposed by the board will be dismissal if the employee does not request a hearing; and o the employee s rights under 3020-b, forwarded to the accused employee by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested or by personal delivery; and filed with the clerk or secretary of the school district or employing board. The school must have developed and substantially implemented a Teacher Improvement Plan (TIP) following the first evaluation in which the educator was rated ineffective and the immediately preceding evaluation if the rating was developing under Education Law 3012-c and/or 3012-d. The parties jointly select the hearing officer within seven days after receiving a list of potential hearing officers from the Commissioner. (The Commissioner must appoint the hearing officer if the two parties are unable to agree.) The pre-hearing conference must be held within seven days after the appointment of the hearing officer. The hearing must begin within seven days of the pre-hearing conference. The final hearing date must be within 90 days of the employee s request for a hearing. Adjournments beyond the 90 day period may be granted if the hearing officer determines that the delay is due to circumstances beyond the control of the requesting party and an injustice would result if the adjournment were not granted. The hearing officer must render a decision within 10 days of the last day of the hearing. Within 15 days of receipt of decision, the school board must implement the decision. Not later than ten days after receipt of the decision, an appeal may be made to the State Supreme Court to vacate or modify the decision. Q: What is the streamlined timeline for teachers receiving three consecutive ineffective ratings in the new 3020-b process? A: A school district or employing board must bring charges of incompetence against any classroom teacher or building principal who receives three consecutive ineffective APPR ratings. All charges brought against a tenured teacher must be in writing specifying: o the charges in detail; o the penalty imposed by the board will be dismissal if the employee does not request a hearing; and o the employee s rights under 3020-b, forwarded to the accused employee by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested or by personal delivery; and filed with the clerk or secretary of the school district or employing board. The Commissioner of Education selects the hearing officer, not the parties. The final hearing date must be within 30 days after the date of the employee s request for a hearing. Adjournments beyond the 30 day period may be granted if the hearing officer determines that the delay is due to circumstances beyond the control of the requesting party and an injustice would result if the adjournment were not granted. The hearing officer must render a decision within 10 days of the last day of the hearing. Within 15 days of receipt of decision, the school board must implement the decision. Not later than ten days after receipt of the decision, an appeal may be made to the State Supreme Court to vacate or modify the decision. 9

Q: How are days defined? A: Days are calendar days unless specified otherwise. Q: How is teacher defined? A: For disciplinary purposes, a teacher is any professional educator holding a teaching certificate including but not limited to a classroom teacher, teaching assistant, pupil personnel services professional, school administrator or supervisor or superintendent of schools. For incompetence procedures based upon the APPR process, it would only include classroom teachers subject to the APPR process under Section 3012-c or 3012-d of the Education Law. Q: What are Cadet Rights? A: The 3020-a hearing process is the sole method by which tenured teachers can be disciplined in NYS, and the statute provides that no teacher can be compelled to testify at the hearing. Consequently, it has been established that a teacher can refuse to answer questions, without being found insubordinate, during an investigation that the teacher believes could lead to such disciplinary action. Known as Cadet Rights, this principle was established through a disciplinary case involving a tenured teacher who was found guilty of misconduct through a 3020-a hearing. However, the decision of the hearing officer to dismiss a charge of insubordination was appealed by the school district. The insubordination charge was related to the teacher s refusal to answer questions during an investigation prior to the hearing In the appeal decision, the Commissioner of Education agreed that a teacher need not answer questions in any pre-hearing investigation which precedes a 3020-a hearing. The decision was in turn affirmed by the courts. Advice to Local Leaders Continue to look for additional analysis and information through NYSUT s Leader and Member Briefings and presentations at regional conferences. Specific questions about tenure and teacher removal as a result of disciplinary issues or the APPR process should be referred to your NYSUT Labor Relations Specialist (LRS). Resources Chapter 56 of the Laws of 2015 can be found at: http://open.nysenate.gov/legislation/bill/s2006b-2015 See Part EE for the Education Transformation Act of 2015. Within Part EE, Subpart D details the teacher tenure provisions and Subpart G details the teacher removal provisions. Emergency regulations implementing these new statutory changes were adopted by the Board of Regents. An overview of the changes and the amended regulations can be found at: http://www.regents.nysed.gov/common/regents/files/meetings/sep%202015/915hea2.pdf TM/DR/mc/vp 99958-updated 10