An Exploration into Political, Economic and Social Globalization of India

Similar documents
International Business 8e. Globalization. Chapter 1. Introduction. By Charles W.L. Hill (adapted for LIUC10 by R.Helg) Agenda:

2017 KOF Index of Globalization

International Business. Globalization. Chapter 1. Introduction 20/09/2011. By Charles W.L. Hill (adapted for LIUC11 by R.

IMPACT OF GLOBALIZATION ON MICRO, SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES IN INDIA. Mr. S. MOHANDASS. Head, Research Department of Commerce,

Globalization and its effect on India

The First Draft. Globalization and international migration in Asian countries (Testing of competition measurement models)

America in the Global Economy

Business Globalization

The Development of FTA Rules of Origin Functions

ASEAN Economic Community (AEC): Can ASEAN learn from the EU?

A few myths and misconceptions regarding Globalization?

Globalization 10/5/2011. International Economics. Five Themes of Geography

Opportunities from Globalization for European Companies

KOF Index of Globalization 2017: Netherlands Are the Most Globalized Country

FOREIGN TRADE DEPENDENCE AND INTERDEPENDENCE: AN INFLUENCE ON THE RESILIENCE OF THE NATIONAL ECONOMY

INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, FINANCE AND TRADE Vol. II - Globalization and the Evolution of Trade - Pasquale M. Sgro

MEASURING GLOBALISATION

AQA Economics A-level

GLOBALIZATION AND IT S INFLUENCE ON THE ROMANIAN BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT

4 Rebuilding a World Economy: The Post-war Era

Chapter 1 Introduction

GLOBALIZATION S CHALLENGES FOR THE DEVELOPED COUNTRIES

Area of study 2: Dynamic Places

VIETNAM FOCUS. The Next Growth Story In Asia?

Ex-ante study of the EU- Australia and EU-New Zealand trade and investment agreements Executive Summary

Explaining Asian Outward FDI

Economic Geography Chapter 10 Development

UNIT 6: Services (Tertiary sector)

LSE Global South Unit Policy Brief Series

LECTURE 1: OVERVIEW OF GLOBALIZATION

Chapter 01 Globalization

Making of the Modern World 15. Lecture #16: Globalization and the Washington Consensus

INDIAN SMALL SCALE INDUSTRIES: AN ANALYSIS IN PRE AND POST GLOBALISED PERIOD

Future Social Market Economy. Globalization Report 2016: who benefits most from globalization?

How to use this lesson

The Asia-Pacific as a Strategic Region for the European Union Tallinn University of Technology 15 Sep 2016

The Development of Sub-Regionalism in Asia. Jin Ting 4016R330-6 Trirat Chaiburanapankul 4017R336-5

HIGHLIGHTS. There is a clear trend in the OECD area towards. which is reflected in the economic and innovative performance of certain OECD countries.

strategic asia asia s rising power Ashley J. Tellis, Andrew Marble, and Travis Tanner Economic Performance

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FOREIGN INVESTMENT REGULATIONS IN INDIA AND MAJOR WORLD ECONOMIES

China ASEAN Relations: Opportunities and Challenges for Development

Dynamics of India's Labour Market

Executive summary. Strong records of economic growth in the Asia-Pacific region have benefited many workers.

GLOBAL TRENDS AND LATIN AMERICAN INTEGRATION

International Economics, 10e (Krugman/Obstfeld/Melitz) Chapter 2 World Trade: An Overview. 2.1 Who Trades with Whom?

Globalization and the nation- state

Ignacio Molina and Iliana Olivié May 2011

Trade Policy, Inequality and Performance in Indian Manufacturing

Economic Globalization: Trends, Risks and Risk Prevention

Asia's giants take different routes By Martin Wolf Published: February :36 Last updated: February :36

Transatlantic and Global Trade, and Security

Globe Fearon. Pacemaker United States History Third Edition, ISBN# correlated to Wisconsin History Content Standards Grades 6-12

Singapore : 1960s. Overdependence Hostile on entrepot trade environment. Small nation. High Withdrawal of British base Low industrial base

Services Trade Liberalization between the European Union and Africa Caribbean and Pacific Countries: A Dynamic Approach

The Gravity Model on EU Countries An Econometric Approach

TOWARDS AN ASEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY: THE CHALLENGES AHEAD

International Business

Asia Pacific Region 15/09/2015. Learning Objectives. Dynamic Growth in the Asia Pacific Region. Chapter 11

3) The European Union is an example of integration. A) regional B) relative C) global D) bilateral

Brunei Darussalam Indonesia Malaysia Philippines East Asian Growth Area (BIMP-EAGA)

A GAtewAy to A Bet ter Life Education aspirations around the World September 2013

Pattern of Intraregional Trade:Unbundling a South Asian Conundrum

Challenge and Change

VIETNAM'S FTA AND IMPLICATION OF PARTICIPATING IN THE TPP

Economic Trends Across the Asia Pacific Region. Pansy Yau Deputy Director of Research

Contemporary Human Geography, 2e. Chapter 9. Development. Lectures. Karl Byrand, University of Wisconsin-Sheboygan Pearson Education, Inc.

India s African Engagement (ARI)

CEDA'S STATE OF THE NATION ANNUAL CONFERENCE, CANBERRA; 22 JUNE, 2010

What has changed about the global economic structure

Cambridge Model United Nations 2018 WTO: The Question of Free Trade Agreements in a Changing World

International Business

International Business Global Edition. Globalization. Chapter 1. Introduction by Charles W.L. Hill (adapted for LIUC2017 by R.

Comments on: Richard Baldwin, The Great Convergence

Mark Scheme (Results) Summer GCE Global Development (6GL01/01) Unit 1: Understanding Global Development

POS 335 Andreas Syz February 17, 2004

Central America strategic sourcing review a focus on Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras

The 33rd Asia-Europe Lecture Tour July 2010 Singapore Bangkok Manila Seoul Shanghai

Impact of Globalization on Indian Public Administration. Dr. Yogesh K. Bhade. Abstract

International Business Global Edition

Trade in Health Services in Pakistan

Building an ASEAN Economic Community in the heart of East Asia By Dr Surin Pitsuwan, Secretary-General of ASEAN,

Building on Global Europe: The Future EU Trade Agenda

pacific alliance Why it s important for western Canada the november 2014 carlo dade

Trade and Security: The Two Sides of US-Indian Relations

Europaforum Luzern [Europe Forum Lucerne]

European & External Relations committee International Engagement inquiry Scotch Whisky Association response January 2015

Trade Policy in PRC and India in the New Era of Slower World Growth:

INTERNATIONAL MULTILATERAL ASSISTANCE FOR SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE POOREST COUNTRIES OF SOUTH-EAST ASIA

Globalization and Inequality: A Structuralist Approach

Globalisation and Open Markets

Geography Advanced Unit 3: Contested Planet

The "Value" of Europe in the World of Global Value Chains. Signe Ratso Director DG Trade, European Commission

SUBJECT SYLLABUS ACADEMIC OVERVIEW INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF ECONOMIC & ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES

The order in which the fivefollowing themes are presented here does not imply an order of priority.

Global Scenarios until 2030: Implications for Europe and its Institutions

Mega Regional Trade Agreements and their Impacts on the Indian Economy Wednesday, 22 April 2015 Venue: FICCI, Federation House, Tansen Marg, New Delhi

IIPS International Conference

REGULATIONS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF INTERNATIONAL AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS (MIPA)

Reserve Bank of India Occasional Papers Vol. 32. No. 1, Summer 2011

Hinrich Foundation Sustainable Trade Index Country overview: Malaysia

Transcription:

DOI : 10.18843/ijms/v5i2(2)/07 DOI URL :http://dx.doi.org/10.18843/ijms/v5i2(2)/07 An Exploration into Political, Economic and Social Globalization of India Dr. Vanishree Sah, Associate Professor, Humanities and Sciences Department CVR College of Engineering, Ibrahimpatnam, India. ABSTRACT Globalization is defined in different ways depending on the context. Globalization is the process of interaction and interchange between the world views, products, ideas and other aspects. Changes in transportation and advances in telecommunication are major factors of globalization. Globalization is also the tendency of investing in businesses to move beyond domestic and national markets to other international markets around the globe, thereby increasing the interrelationship of the world. Globalization has marked its effect in international trade and cultural activities. According to the international KOF globalization index (2016) report, India was ranked at 107 out of 184 countries. This shows that India is not totally globalised as we think. This paper tries to analyse the status of India s globalization and also studies the weak social and economic globalization with regard to India. Keywords: Political Globalization, Economic Globalization, Social Globalization. INTRODUCTION: Globalization is the process of worldwide integration of economic, financial, cultural, environmental, and communication system. It refers to a scenario where countries and nations around the world become interconnected and interdependent for meeting their needs, both internal and external. In the present time of globalization, the economies of the nations are inter-dependent. In the event that the economy of one country is in risk, different nations likewise feel the effects. Organizations are take part in worldwide exchanges. Send out import among nations includes monstrous measure of cash. For instance, China has turned into a huge assembling center. The electronic merchandise produced in China are sold crosswise over practically every nation of the world. Multinational-organizations have financial enthusiasm over a few countries. Organizations, for example, Cocacola, Pepsi, Ford, Unilever, TATA, and so forth work over various nations. They have enormous market and make immense interest in remote nations. A decrease sought after in one nation influences the general execution of these organizations. India had the distinction of being the world's largest economy during and after Indus Valley civilization. The goods produced in India had long been exported to far off destinations across the world. Thus, the globalisation concept is not new to India. But, in modern era, globalization id differently conceptualized. Globalization is measured in three dimensions i.e. economic globalization, political globalization and social globalization. Political globalization is determined by the number of treaties signed between two or more states, Economic globalization has two dimensions: restrictions to trade and capital and actual economic flows. Social globalization has three dimensions: cultural proximity, information flows, and personal contacts. India s political globalization is good, but social and economic globalization status is a concern at present. Vol. V, Issue 2(2), April 2018 [46]

How does Globalization work? India picked up exceedingly from the LPG show as its GDP expanded to 9.7% in 2007-2008. In regard of market capitalization, India positions fourth on the planet. In any case, even after globalization, agricultural sector has not progressed. The share of agribusiness in the GDP is just 17%. The quantity of landless families has expanded and agriculturists are as yet submitting suicide. In any case, seeing the constructive outcomes of globalization, one might say that soon India will defeat these obstacles as well and walk firmly on its way of advancement. The lesson of late experience is that a nation should precisely pick a blend of approaches that best empowers it to accept the open door - while maintaining a strategic distance from the pitfalls. For over a century the United States has been the biggest economy on the planet yet real improvements have occurred on the planet Economy from that point forward, prompting to the move of center from the US and the rich nations of Europe to the two Asian mammoths India and China. Financial aspects specialists and different reviews led over the globe visualize India and China to lead the world in the 21st century. India, which is presently the fourth biggest economy as far as buying force equality, may surpass Japan and turn out to be third major monetary power inside 10 years. To close we can state that the modernization that we see around us in our day by day life is a commitment of Globalization. Globalization has both positive and in addition negative effects on different segments of Indian Economy. So Globalization has taken us far from 1991 which has resultant in the headway our nation. LITERATURE REVIEW: Mathew V Kurian. (2004) in his article, Globalization and its Socio-Economic Impact, the author opines that multiple views prevail on nature of globalization as well as its socio- economic impact. He has discussed the various theoretical aspects of globalization and its socio economic impact. The basic perception of the author is that the present day globalization is imperialist s globalization. He marks out that the phenomenon of globalization is viewed from three perspectives: 1. Globalization as an ideology 2. Globalization as a process, and 3. Globalization as a program or project Arvind (2002) in his book on Globalization: An Attack on India s Sovereignty, contends that the 180 years of colonial rule has devastated India and sent it back to the medieval period and last 15 years of globalization has reversed what little was achieved after the independence. Calling globalization as the crisis management programme to save the stagnated capitalist countries of the world its implications are not only limited to the economy but it is determining political decision making and penetrating into every aspects of the social-cultural life of the people. Ahluwalia, Montek (2004), stated that developing nations, including India, should pro-actively promote globalisation as they will benefit from an open world economy. There is a need to focus on activities in the Asian region which is emerging as the most prosperous part of the world. Within a few years, developing countries are going to be the dominant part of the world economy. John A. Mathews (2006), argues that Dragon Multinationals adopt a different perspective to the resources accessed through internationalization, and that this requires a rethink of the criteria normally utilized in resourcebased accounts of strategy. The challenger firm internationalizing in order to access resources also poses a challenge to the dominant OLI (ownership, locational, internalization) account of multinational advantage. Gupta K.L. and Harvinder Kaur, (2006) perceive that globalization in India is crisis driven, and without any preparatory work. Hence, it will be futile to hope that it will really work for all the sections of the society, unless certain changes are made keeping in mind the history, culture and geography of a particular country in general and India in particular. OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY: To analyse the political globalization of India To analyze the economic globalization of India To analyze the social globalization of India RESEARCH METHODOLOGY: The source of secondary data is KOF index of Globalization from year 2010-2016. Vol. V, Issue 2(2), April 2018 [47]

DATA ANALYSIS: Overall Globalization of India: India is more dependent on the world than the world is on India. This reality needs to change to favour Indian needs. The table below shows the Overall Globalization Rankings of India from 2010-2016. Table 1: Overall Globalization Rankings of India from 2010-2016 2010 111 51.26 2011 116 51.00 2012 110 51.88 2013 107 51.57 2014 112 50.41 2015 109 50.77 2016 107 51.26 The above table shows that the overall globalization ranking index of India is fluctuating only between 50-52. The overall globalization ranking of India was at 111 in 2010 and in the year 2011 it went down to 116 and again in 2016 it went up to 107 which is a good indication. Political Globalization: There has been a rise in the influence and power of international and regional institutions such as the European Union (EU), Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), the United Nations (UN), the World Trade Organization (WTO), MERCOSUR in South America, and the Association for Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). These international and supranational institutions increasingly shape domestic politics. The table below shows the Political Globalization Rankings of India from 2010-2016. Table 2: Political Globalization Rankings of India from 2010-2016 2010 20 92.69 2011 22 92.46 2012 23 91.98 2013 18 92.21 2014 17 95.52 2015 20 91.7 2016 22 91.78 The above table shows that the political globalization raking index of India was good from the beginning. In 2010 the rank was 20 with index of 92.69. In 2014 India ranked 17th with 95.52 index. But in 2016 the rank went down to 22 with 91.78 index. The political globalization ranking of India has been good because of the following variables which are very strong in India: Embassies in Country Membership in International Organizations Participation in U.N. Security Council Missions International Treaties Economic Globalization: Due to Economic Globalization the world becomes a single global market of individual consumers. These consumers are characterized by their material and economic self-interest rather than cultural, civic or other forms of identity. The expansion and dominance of global companies and brands has led to deep global interconnectedness not only by uniformly shaping consumption patterns across societies, but by binding economies together through complex supply chains, trade networks, flows of capital and manpower. The table below shows the Economic Globalization Rankings of India from 2010-2016. Vol. V, Issue 2(2), April 2018 [48]

Table 3: Economic Globalization Rankings of India from 2010-2016 2010 122 44.68 2011 122 42.74 2012 129 43.73 2013 128 42.71 2014 133 41.67 2015 135 42.84 2016 144 41.91 The above table shows that Economic globalization ranking of India in 2010 as 122 with index of 44.68. In 2016 the rank fell down to 144 with 41.91 index which is comparatively low. The fall in the rank has been due to the following variables of economic globalization which have been weak in India:- i) Actual Flows Trade (percent of GDP) Foreign Direct Investment, stocks Portfolio Investment Income Payments to Foreign Nationals ii) Restrictions Hidden Import Barriers Mean Tariff Rate Taxes on International Trade (percent of current revenue) Capital Account Restrictions Social Globalization: Social Globalization has involved due to continuous dispersion of ideals and religious beliefs. Most importantly, though, it is marked by the increase in association among people from separate parts of the world. The table below shows the Social Globalization Rankings of India from 2010-2016. Table 4: Social Globalization Rankings of India from 2010-2016 2010 147 31.28 2011 150 32.78 2012 142 31.67 2013 144 31.63 2014 155 29.85 2015 153 29.98 2016 151 30.45 The above table shows that the Social Globalization ranking of India in 2010 was 147 with 31.28 index. In 2012 the rank went up to 142 with index of 31.63. But in the year 2016 the rank came down to 151 with index of 30.45 which is not a good sign. The Social Globalization has been weak in India because of following weak variables: i) Data on Personal Contact: Telephone Traffic, Transfers, International Tourism, Foreign Population, International letters ii) Data on Information Flows:-Internet Users, Television, Trade in Newspapers iii) Data on Cultural Proximity CONCLUSIONS: Attempts to improve the economic conditions through globalization have been made in India and liberalisation has also paved the way to achieve maximum output, quality and value products but regionalism, communalism and political discretion are the main obstacles in the way to good governance. The principles of liberalisation Vol. V, Issue 2(2), April 2018 [49]

need to be observed by Indian administration to face the challenges of globalization and to maintain its status and significance in our society. Globalisation has improved the overall economic status of people as well as the Indian nation, as a whole. REFERENCES: Ahluwalia, Montek (2004). Understanding India s Reform Trajectory: Past Trends and Future Challenges, India Review, Vol.3, No.4, October 2004. Arvind (2002). Globalization: An attack on Indian Sovereignty, New Vistas Publications, New Delhi. Gupta K.L. and Harvinder Kaur, (2006). New Indian Economy and Reform, Deep and Deep Publication Pvt. Ltd. Delhi. John A. Mathews (2006). Dragon multinationals: New players in 21st century globalization, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, March 2006, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 5 27 Mathew V Kurian (2004). Globalization and its Socio- Economic Impact, Mainstream, Vol.13. No. 15 April 3, New Delhi, pp.13-16. ---- Vol. V, Issue 2(2), April 2018 [50]