CHAPTER TEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Similar documents
ANNEX XV REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 7 PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

ANNEX VII REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 25 PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

ANNEX XVII REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 5 PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

CONSOLIDATED TEXT REFLECTS CHANGES MADE DURING THE SEPTEMBER 2010 TOKYO ROUND. Consolidated Text. Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

MARRAKESH AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION ANNEX 1C: AGREEMENT ON TRADE-RELATED ASPECTS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS *

Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement) (1994)*

EN Official Journal of the European Union L 157/ 45. DIRECTIVE 2004/48/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 29 April 2004

Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, 33 I.L.M (1994)

ANNEX VI REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 24 PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

MODULE. Conclusion. ESTIMATED TIME: 3 hours

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM ON TRADE RELATIONS CHAPTER II INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

DRAFT AGREEMENT ON TRADE-RELATED ASPECTS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

The Trans-Pacific Partnership

Article 12 Geographical Indications. Article 12.1 Protection of Geographical Indications

AGREEMENT. On trade and economic cooperation between the Government of the Republic of Armenia and the Swiss Federal Council

MULTILATERAL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS THE URUGUAY ROUND

ANNEX V REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 23 PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

ACT AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING THE DESIGNATIONS OF ORIGIN OF PRODUCTS AND SERVICES ACT*/**/***

having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2013)0161),

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY BILL

REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA LAW ON THE PROTECTION OF PLANT VARIETIES. 22 November 2001 No IX 618 (As last amended by 26 April 2012 No XI-1994) Vilnius

CAMBODIA Trademark Law The Law Concerning Marks, Trade Names and Acts of Unfair Competition as amended on February 07, 2002

LAW ON AMENDMENTS AND ADDITIONS TO LAW No. 312, LAW ON COPYRIGHT AND RELATED RIGHTS. LAW No. 577, Adopted on March 16, 2006

Council of the European Union Brussels, 28 October 2015 (OR. en)

(1971)" refers to the Paris Act ofthis Convention of 24 July "Rome Convention" refers to the International Convention for the Protection of Perf

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE HASHEMITE KINGDOM OF JORDAN ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A FREE-TRADE AREA

MULTILATERAL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS THE URUGUAY ROUND

ETHIOPIA Trademarks Law Trademark Registration and Protection Proclamation No. 501/2006 ENTRY INTO FORCE: July 7, 2006

TRADE MARKS ACT (CHAPTER 332)

COMMUNITY TRADE MARK ORDER 2014

Federal Act on the Protection of Trade Marks and Indications of Source

TRADE MARKS ACT 1996 (as amended)

EUROPEAN UNION Council Regulation on geographical indications and designations of origin

Adopted text. - Trade mark regulation

HUNGARY Patent Act Act XXXIII of 1995 as consolidated on March 01, 2015

Benelux Convention on Intellectual Property (trademarks and designs) 1

TAG-Legal tag-legal.com

OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF KOSOVA / No. 12 / 29 AVGUST 2011, PRISTINA. LAW No. 04/L-029 ON PATENTS LAW ON PATENTS

The Consolidate Trade Marks Act 1)

Courtesy translation provided by WIPO, 2012

Article 4. Signs, registered as trademarks The following signs may be registered as trademarks:

The Consolidate Trade Marks Act 1)

WIPO Copyright Treaty and Agreed Statements Concerning the WIPO Copyright Treaty

Delegations will find in the Annex a Presidency compromise proposal concerning the abovementioned

The Consolidate Utility Models Act 1)

THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA, hereinafter referred to as the Republic of Macedonia,

Act No. 435/2001 Coll. on Patents, Supplementary Protection Certificates and on Amendment of Some Acts as Amended (The Patent Act)

Law on Trademarks and Indications of Geographical Origin

EUROPEAN UNION Council Regulation on the Community Trade Mark No. 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 ENTRY INTO FORCE: April 13, 2009

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA PERFORMERS PROTECTION AMENDMENT BILL, 2016

Official Journal of the European Union L 251/3

REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA LAW AMENDING THE LAW ON TRADEMARKS AND SERVICE MARKS. No of

Legal Supplement Part C to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 53, No. 152, 4th December, No. 22 of 2014

THE LAW ON TRADEMARKS 1. Article 1

Chapter 16 of the above-mentioned Agreement establishes provisions relating to the need to respect and safeguard intellectual property rights;

Treaties. of May 20, 2015

WIPO INTRODUCTORY SEMINAR ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Official Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) REGULATIONS

Act No. 8 of 2015 BILL

CZECH REPUBLIC Trademark Act No. 441/2003 Coll. of December 3, 2003 ENTRY INTO FORCE: April 1, 2004

Global Access to Medicines Program Compiled by Stephanie Rosenberg. December 2, This chart compares provisions from the following texts:

Working Group on the Development of the Lisbon System (Appellations of Origin)

DRAFT GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS BILL 2007

ACT ON TRADE MARKS PART ONE TRADE MARKS CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS

IRELAND Trade Marks Act as amended up to and including the February 2, 2016

Working Group on the Development of the Lisbon System (Appellations of Origin)

DECISION 486 Common Intellectual Property Regime (Non official translation)

RUSSIA Patent Law #3517-I of September 23, 1992, as amended by the federal law 22-FZ of February 7, 2003 ENTRY INTO FORCE: March 11, 2003

THE INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY BILL (No... of 2016) Explanatory Memorandum

GUIDE TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN MAURITIUS

Contributing firm Granrut Avocats

Korean Intellectual Property Office

CHAPTER 416 TRADEMARKS ACT

GENEVA ACT OF THE LISBON AGREEMENT ON APPELLATIONS OF ORIGIN AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS

PATENT ACT, B.E (1979) 1. BHUMIBOL ADULYADEJ, REX; Given on the 11 th Day of March B.E. 2522; Being the 34 th Year of the Present Reign

Patent Act, B.E (1979) As Amended until Patent Act (No.3), B.E (1999) Translation

LATVIA Patent Law adopted on 15 February 2007, with the changes of December 15, 2011

Supported by. A global guide for practitioners

Law on Trademarks and Geographical Indications

UNITED KINGDOM Trade Marks Act Last updated on 27 April 2017.

Law On Trade Marks and Indications of Geographical Origin

Note: When any ambiguity of interpretation is found in this provisional translation, the Japanese text shall prevail. Part III Patentability

Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China

Trade Marks Act 1994

Viet Nam Law No. 50/2005/QH11

L 172/4 EN Official Journal of the European Union

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAWS AMENDMENT BILL

Trade Marks Act* (Act No. 11 of 1955, as last amended by Act No. 31 of 1997) ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

ON TRADEMARKS LAW ON TRADEMARKS CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS

INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY ACT, No. 8 of 2010 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS. PART II Patents

a/ Disputes among individuals over copyright to literature, artistic or scientific works or derivative works;

Intellectual Property Laws Amendment Bill 2013 No., 2013

THE COPYRIGHT (AMENDMENT) ACT 2017 Act No. 13 of I assent

REGISTERED DESIGNS ACT /221

THE PEOPLE S REPUBLIC OF CHINA TRADEMARK LAW

MULTILATERAL TRADE. NEGOTIATIONS 23 July 1990 RESTRICTED. Special Distribution THE URUGUAY ROUND. Negotiating Group on Trade-Related

(As published in UPOV Gazette No. 94, December 2002) Republic of Moldova State Agency on Industrial Property Protection

FINAL PROPOSAL OF THE ACT ON AMENDMENTS TO THE PATENT ACT

Transcription:

CHAPTER TEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 1. The objectives of this Chapter are to: Article 10.1 Objectives facilitate the production and commercialisation of innovative and creative products and the provision of services between the Parties; and increase the benefits from trade and investment through the adequate and effective level of protection of intellectual property rights and the provision of measures for the effective enforcement of such rights. 2. The objectives and principles set forth in Part I of the TRIPS Agreement, in particular in Article 7 (Objectives) and Article 8 (Principles) shall apply to this Chapter, mutatis mutandis. SECTION A Principles Article 10.2 Scope and Definitions 1. The Parties recall the commitments under the international treaties dealing with intellectual property, including the TRIPS Agreement and the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property (of March 20, 1883, as revised at Stockholm on July 15, 1967; hereinafter referred to as the Paris Convention ). The provisions of this Chapter shall complement the rights and obligations of the Parties under the TRIPS Agreement and other international treaties in the field of intellectual property to which they both are parties. 2. For the purposes of this Chapter, intellectual property rights means: all categories of intellectual property that are the subject of Sections 1 through 7 of Part II of the TRIPS Agreement namely: (i) copyright and related rights; (ii) patents; 1 (iii) trademarks; (iv) designs; (v) layout-designs (topographies) of integrated circuits; 1 In the case of the Union, for the purposes of this Chapter, patents include rights derived from supplementary protection certificates. 1

(vi) geographical indications; (vii) protection of undisclosed information; and plant variety rights. Article 10.3 Exhaustion Each Party shall be free to establish its own regime for the exhaustion of intellectual property rights subject to the relevant provisions of the TRIPS Agreement. SECTION B Standards Concerning Intellectual Property Rights Sub-Section A Copyright and Related Rights Article 10.4 Protection Granted The Parties shall comply with the rights and obligations set out in the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (of September 9, 1886, as last revised at Paris on July 24, 1971), the WIPO Copyright Treaty (adopted in Geneva on December 20, 1996), the WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty (adopted in Geneva on December 20, 1996), and the TRIPS Agreement. 2 The Parties may provide for protection of performers, producers of phonograms and broadcasting organisations in accordance with the relevant provisions of the International Convention for the Protection of Performers, Producers of Phonograms and Broadcasting Organisations (done at Rome on October 26, 1961). Article 10.5 Term of Protection 1. Each Party shall provide, where the term of protection of a work is to be calculated on the basis of the life of the author, that the term shall be not less than the life of the author and seventy years after the author s death. 2. In the case of a work of joint authorship, the term referred to in paragraph 1 shall be calculated from the death of the last surviving author. 3. The term of protection of cinematographic works 3 shall be not less than seventy years after the work has been made available to the public with the consent of the 2 3 Without prejudice to Article 10.6 (Producers of Phonograms), the Parties recognise that references to these international agreements are subject to the reservations which each Party has formulated in relation thereto. For the Union, the term cinematographic works also includes audiovisual works. 2

author or, failing such an event within fifty years from the making of such a work, at least seventy years after the making. 4 4. The term of protection for rights in phonograms shall be not less than fifty years after the making and, if published within this period, no less than seventy years after the first lawful publication. 5. The term of protection for rights in broadcasts shall be not less than fifty years after the first transmission or making of the broadcast. 6. The terms laid down in this Article shall be calculated from the first of January of the year following the event which gives rise to them. Article 10.6 Producers of Phonograms Each Party shall provide producers of phonograms 5 with the right to a single equitable remuneration, if a phonogram published for commercial purposes or a reproduction of such phonogram is used for broadcasting by wireless means or public performance. 6, 7 Article 10.7 Resale Rights The Parties agree to exchange views and information on practices and policies with regard to the resale rights of artists. Article 10.8 Cooperation on Collective Management of Rights The Parties shall endeavour to promote dialogue and cooperation among their respective collective management societies with the purpose of ensuring easier access and delivery of content between the territories of the Parties, and the transfer of royalties arising from the use of works or other copyright-protected subject matter. Article 10.9 Protection of Technological Measures 1. Each Party shall provide adequate legal protection and effective legal remedies against the circumvention of any effective technological measures 8 that are used by 4 5 6 7 8 In the case of the Union, the term of protection expires seventy years after the death of the last person designated as author under its domestic law, which will not in any case be shorter than the minimum duration of protection provided under paragraph 3 of Article 10.5 (Term of Protection). Producer of a phonogram means the person or the legal entity, who or which takes the initiative and has the responsibility for the first fixation of the sounds of a performance or other sounds, or the representations of sounds. Public performance means, in relation to a phonogram, any mode of aural presentation to the public of sounds or representations of sounds fixed in a phonogram. Singapore shall fully implement the obligations of this Article within two years of the entry into force of this Agreement. For the purposes of this Article, technological measures means any technology, device or component that, in the normal course of its operation, is designed to prevent or restrict acts, in respect of works, performances, or phonograms, which are not authorised by authors, performers or producers of phonograms, as provided for by each Party s domestic law. Without prejudice to the scope of copyright 3

authors, performers or producers of phonograms in connection with the exercise of their rights in, and that restrict acts in respect of, their works, performances, and phonograms, which are not authorised by the authors, the performers or the producers of phonograms concerned or permitted by domestic law. 9 2. In order to provide the adequate legal protection and effective legal remedies referred to in paragraph 1, each Party shall provide protection at least against: to the extent provided by its domestic law: (i) (ii) the unauthorised circumvention of an effective technological measure carried out knowingly or with reasonable grounds to know; and the offering to the public by marketing of a device or product, including computer programs, or a service, as a means of circumventing an effective technological measure; and the manufacture, importation, or distribution of a device or product, including computer programs, or provision of a service that: (i) (ii) is primarily designed or produced for the purpose of circumventing an effective technological measure; or has only a limited commercially significant purpose other than circumventing an effective technological measure. 10 3. In providing adequate legal protection and effective legal remedies pursuant to paragraph 1, a Party may adopt or maintain appropriate limitations or exceptions to measures implementing paragraphs 1 and 2. The obligations under paragraphs 1 and 2 are without prejudice to the rights, limitations, exceptions, or defences to copyright or related rights infringement under each Party s domestic law. Article 10.10 Protection of Rights Management Information 1. To protect electronic rights management information, 11 each Party shall provide adequate legal protection and effective legal remedies against any person knowingly 9 10 11 or related rights contained in each Party s domestic law, technological measures shall be deemed effective where the use of protected works, performances, or phonograms is controlled by authors, performers or producers of phonograms through the application of a relevant access control or protection process, such as encryption or scrambling, or a copy control mechanism, which achieves the objective of protection. Nothing in this Chapter shall require Singapore to restrict the importation or domestic sale of a device that does not render effective a technological measure which sole purpose is to control market segmentation for legitimate copies of motion pictures, and is not otherwise a violation of its domestic law. In implementing paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article, neither Party shall be obligated to require that the design of, or the design and selection of parts and components for, a consumer electronics product, telecommunications product or computing product, provide for a response to any particular technological measure, so long as the product does not otherwise contravene its measures implementing these paragraphs. For the purposes of this Article, rights management information means: information that identifies the work, the performance, or the phonogram; the author of the work, the performer of the performance, or the producer of the phonogram; or the owner of any right in the work, performance or phonogram; information about the terms and conditions of use of the work, performance, or phonogram; or (c) any number or codes that represent the information described in subparagraphs and, 4

performing without authority any of the following acts knowing or, with respect to civil remedies, having reasonable grounds to know, that it will induce, enable, facilitate or conceal an infringement of any copyright or related rights. Such following acts are: to remove or alter any electronic rights management information; to distribute, import for distribution, broadcast, communicate, or make available to the public copies of works, performances, or phonograms, knowing that electronic rights management information has been removed or altered without authority. 2. In providing adequate legal protection and effective legal remedies pursuant to paragraph 1, a Party may adopt or maintain appropriate limitations or exceptions to measures implementing paragraph 1. The obligations under paragraph 1 are without prejudice to the rights, limitations, exceptions or defences to copyright or related rights infringement under a Party s domestic law. Article 10.11 Exceptions and Limitations The Parties may provide for limitations or exceptions to the rights under Article 10.6 (Producers of Phonograms) only in certain special cases which do not conflict with a normal exploitation of the work or other subject matter and do not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the right holders. Sub-Section B Trademarks Article 10.12 International Agreements Each Party shall make all reasonable efforts to comply with the Trademark Law Treaty (done at Geneva on October 27, 1994) and the Singapore Treaty on the Law of Trademarks (adopted in Singapore on March 27, 2006). 12 Article 10.13 Registration Procedure Each Party shall provide for a system for the registration of trademarks in which the relevant trademark administration shall give reasons for a refusal to register a trademark in writing. The applicant shall have the opportunity to appeal against such refusal before a judicial authority. Each Party shall introduce the possibility for third parties to oppose trademark applications. Each Party shall provide a publicly available electronic database of trademark applications and trademark registrations. 12 when any of these items of information is attached to a copy of a work, performance, or phonogram, or appears in connection with the communication or making available of a work, performance or phonogram to the public. Singapore is a party to the Singapore Treaty on the Law of Trademarks, while the Union shall make all reasonable efforts to facilitate accession to the Singapore Treaty on the Law of Trademarks. 5

Article 10.14 Well-Known Trademarks The Parties shall protect well-known trademarks in accordance with the TRIPS Agreement. In determining whether a trademark is well-known, the Parties shall give consideration to the Joint Recommendation Concerning Provisions on the Protection of Well-Known Marks, adopted by the Assembly of the Paris Union for the Protection of Industrial Property and the General Assembly of the WIPO at the Thirty-Fourth Series of Meetings of the Assemblies of the Member States of WIPO on September 20 to 29, 1999. Each Party: Article 10.15 Exceptions to the Rights Conferred by a Trademark shall provide for the fair use of descriptive terms 13 as a limited exception to the rights conferred by trademarks; and may provide for other limited exceptions, provided that these exceptions take account of the legitimate interests of the owners of the trademarks and of third parties. Sub-Section C Geographical Indications 14 Article 10.16 Scope 1. Sub-Section C (Geographical Indications) applies to the recognition and protection of geographical indications for wines, spirits, agricultural products and foodstuffs which are originating in the territories of the Parties. 2. Geographical indications of a Party to be protected by the other Party shall only be subject to Sub-Section C (Geographical Indications) if they are recognised and declared as geographical indications in their country of origin. Article 10.17 System of Protection of Geographical Indications 1. Each Party shall, upon the entry into force of this Agreement, establish systems for the registration and protection of geographical indications in its territory, for such categories of wines and spirits and agricultural products and foodstuffs as it deems appropriate. 2. The systems referred to in paragraph 1 shall contain elements such as: 13 14 The fair use of descriptive terms includes the use of a sign to indicate the geographic origin of the goods or services, and where such use is in accordance with honest practices in industrial or commercial matters. For the purposes of this Chapter, geographical indications means indications which identify a good as originating in the territory of a Party, or a region or locality in that territory, where a given quality, reputation or other characteristic of the good is essentially attributable to its geographical origin. 6

(c) (d) a domestic register; an administrative process to verify that the geographical indications entered, or to be entered, on the domestic register referred to in subparagraph 2, identify a good as originating in the territory of a Party, or a region or locality in that Party s territory, where a given quality, reputation or other characteristic of the good is essentially attributable to its geographical origin; an objection procedure that allows the legitimate interests of third parties to be taken into account; and legal means that permit the rectification and cancellation of entries on the domestic register referred to in subparagraph 2, that take into account the legitimate interests of third parties and the right holders of the registered geographical indications in question. 3. The Parties shall, as soon as practicable after the procedures for protection of geographical indications in each Party 15 have been concluded for all the names listed in Annex 10-A, meet to adopt a decision in the Trade Committee referred to under Article 16.1 (Trade Committee) regarding the listing in Annex 10-B of the names from Annex 10-A of each Party that have been and remain protected as geographical indications under the respective Party s system as referred to in paragraph 2. Article 10.18 Amendment of List of Geographical Indications The Parties agree on the possibility of amending the list of geographical indications for wines, spirits, agricultural products and foodstuffs listed in Annex 10-B to be protected by each Party under Sub-Section C (Geographical Indications). Such amendments to Annex 10-B shall be subject to the geographical indications having been and remaining protected as geographical indications under the respective Party s system as referred to in paragraph 2 of Article 10.17 (System of Protection of Geographical Indications). Article 10.19 Scope of Protection of Geographical Indications 1. Subject to Article 10.22 (General Rules), each Party shall, in respect of geographical indications for wines, spirits, agricultural products and foodstuffs listed in Annex 10- B and remaining protected as geographical indications under its system as referred to in paragraph 2 of Article 10.17 (System of Protection of Geographical Indications), provide the legal means for interested parties to prevent: the use of any means in the designation or presentation of a good that indicates or suggests that the good in question originates in a geographical area other than the true place of origin in a manner which misleads the public as to the geographical origin of the good; and any other use which constitutes an act of unfair competition within the meaning of Article 10bis (Unfair Competition) of the Paris Convention. 15 For the purposes of Sub-Section C (Geographical Indications), in the case of Singapore, the procedure for protection of geographical indications refers to the domestic registration procedure under the system established by Singapore pursuant to paragraph 2 of Article 10.17 (System of Protection of Geographical Indications). 7

2. Subject to Article 10.22 (General Rules), each Party shall, in respect of geographical indications for wines and spirits listed in Annex 10-B and remaining protected as geographical indications under its system as referred to in paragraph 2 of Article 10.17 (System of Protection of Geographical Indications), provide the legal means for interested parties to prevent the use of any such geographical indication identifying wines for wines not originating in the place indicated by the geographical indication in question or identifying spirits for spirits not originating in the place indicated by the geographical indication in question, even where: (c) the true origin of the good is indicated; the geographical indication is used in translation; or the geographical indication is accompanied by expressions such as kind, type, style, imitation, or the like. 3. Subject to Article 10.22 (General Rules), each Party shall, in respect of geographical indications for agricultural products and foodstuffs listed in Annex 10-B and remaining protected as geographical indications under its system as referred to in paragraph 2 of Article 10.17 (System of Protection of Geographical Indications), provide the legal means for interested parties to prevent the use of any such geographical indication identifying a good for a like good 16 not originating in the place indicated by the geographical indication in question, even where: (c) the true origin of the good is indicated; the geographical indication is used in translation; 17 or the geographical indication is accompanied by expressions such as kind, type, style, imitation, or the like. 4. Nothing in Sub-Section C (Geographical Indications) shall require a Party to apply its provisions in respect of a geographical indication in the case of the failure of a right holder to: renew the registration; or maintain minimal commercial activity or interest, including commercialisation, promotion or market monitoring, of the geographical indication in that Party s market. 5. Without prejudice to paragraph 3 of Article 23 of the TRIPS Agreement, each Party shall determine the practical conditions under which homonymous geographical indications will be differentiated from each other in its territory, taking into account the need to ensure equitable treatment of the producers concerned and that consumers are not misled. 16 17 For the purposes of this paragraph and paragraph 1 of Article 10.21 (Relationship with Trademarks), the term like good, in relation to a good for which a geographical indication has been protected in a Party s system as referred to in paragraph 2 of Article 10.17 (System of Protection of Geographical Indications), means a good that would fall within the same category of good in that Party s register as the good for which a geographical indication has been registered. For greater certainty, it is understood that this is assessed on a case-by-case basis. This provision does not apply where evidence is provided that there is no link between the protected geographical indication and the translated term. It is further understood that this provision applies without prejudice to the general rules of Sub-Section C (Geographical Indications). 8

6. Where a Party receives an application for registration or protection of a geographical indication that is homonymous with one of the geographical indications in Annex 10- B, that Party will take into consideration the views and submissions of the applicant and the producers concerned 18 in determining the conditions under which the geographical indications will be differentiated from each other. Article 10.20 Right of Use of Geographical Indications The person who may use a geographical indication protected under Sub-Section C (Geographical Indications) is not limited to the applicant, provided that such use is in relation to the goods as identified by that geographical indication. Article 10.21 Relationship with Trademarks 1. Subject to Article 10.22 (General Rules), in respect of geographical indications listed in Annex 10-B and remaining protected as geographical indications under a Party s system as referred to in paragraph 2 of Article 10.17 (System of Protection of Geographical Indications), the registration of a trademark for goods which contains, or consists of, a geographical indication identifying like goods shall be refused or invalidated ex officio if that Party s domestic law so permits, or at the request of an interested party, with respect to goods not having the origin of the geographical indication concerned, provided the application to register the trademark is submitted after the date of application for registration of the geographical indication in the territory concerned. 2. Without prejudice to paragraph 4, the Parties acknowledge that the existence of a prior conflicting trademark in a Party would not completely preclude the registration of a subsequent geographical indication for like goods in that Party. 19 3. Where a trademark has been applied for or registered in good faith, or where rights to a trademark have been acquired through use in good faith, if that possibility is provided by the Parties respective domestic laws, either: before the date of application for protection of the geographical indication in the territory concerned; or before the geographical indication is protected in its country of origin, measures adopted to implement Sub-Section C (Geographical Indications) shall not prejudice the eligibility for or the validity of the registration of a trademark, or the right to use a trademark, on the basis that such a trademark is identical with, or similar to, a geographical indication. 4. The Parties shall have no obligation to protect a geographical indication pursuant to Sub-Section C (Geographical Indications) where, in the light of a reputed or well- 18 19 In the case of Singapore, the producers concerned refers to the right holders in question. In the case of Singapore, a geographical indication which conflicts with a prior existing trademark is capable of being registered with the consent of the prior existing trademark rights holder. In the case of the Union, such consent is not a prerequisite to the registration of a geographical indication which conflicts with a prior existing trademark. 9

known trademark, protection is liable to mislead consumers as to the true identity of the product. Article 10.22 General Rules 1. Import, export and commercialisation of products referred to in Sub-Section C (Geographical Indications) in the territory of a Party shall be governed by the domestic law of that Party. 2. For agricultural products and foodstuffs, nothing in Sub-Section C (Geographical Indications) shall require a Party to prevent continued and similar use of any geographical indication of the other Party in connection with goods or services by any of its nationals or domiciliaries, who have used that geographical indication in a continuous manner with regard to the same or related goods or services in the territory of that Party either: for at least ten years preceding 1st January 2004; or in good faith preceding that date. 3. In relation to the geographical indications to be listed in Annex 10-B, where prior use has been determined pursuant to: the opposition proceedings during the domestic registration procedures; or any legal proceedings, such prior use shall be listed in Annex 10-B in respect of the geographical indication in question: (i) in accordance with the mechanism established in paragraph 3 of Article 10.17 (System of Protection of Geographical Indications) in the case of subparagraph 3; and (ii) in accordance with the mechanism established in Article 10.18 (Amendment of List of Geographical Indications) in the case of subparagraph 3. 4. Each Party may determine the practical conditions under which such prior use will be differentiated from the geographical indication in its territory, taking into account the need to ensure that consumers are not misled. 5. Nothing in Sub-Section C (Geographical Indications) shall require a Party to apply its provisions in respect of a geographical indication of the other Party with respect to goods or services for which the relevant indication is identical with the term customary in common language as the common name for such goods or services in the territory of that Party. 6. Nothing in Sub-Section C (Geographical Indications) shall require a Party to apply its provisions in respect of any name contained in a geographical indication of the other Party with respect to goods or services for which the name is identical with the term customary in common language as the common name for such goods or services in the territory of that Party. 7. Nothing in Sub-Section C (Geographical Indications) shall require a Party to apply its provisions in respect of a geographical indication of the other Party with respect to products of the vine for which the relevant indication is identical with the 10

customary name of a grape variety existing in the territory of that Party as of the date of entry into force of the WTO Agreement in that Party. 8. Nothing in Sub-Section C (Geographical Indications) shall prevent a Party from protecting as a geographical indication, in accordance with its domestic law, a term that conflicts with the name of a plant variety or animal breed. 9. A Party may provide that any request made under Sub-Section C (Geographical Indications) in connection with the use or registration of a trademark must be presented within five years after the adverse use of the protected indication has become generally known in that Party or after the date of registration of the trademark in that Party provided that the trademark has been published by that date, if such date is earlier than the date on which the adverse use became generally known in that Party, provided that the geographical indication is not used or registered in bad faith. 10. Nothing in Sub-Section C (Geographical Indications) shall prejudice the right of any person to use, in the course of trade, that person s name or the name of that person s predecessor in business, except where such name is used in such a manner as to mislead the public. 11. Nothing in Sub-Section C (Geographical Indications) shall oblige a Party to protect a geographical indication of the other Party which is not or ceases to be protected in accordance with the domestic law of its country of origin. The Parties shall notify each other if a geographical indication ceases to be protected in its country of origin. Article 10.23 Relation to Trade Committee The Trade Committee established pursuant to Article 16.1 (Trade Committee) shall have the authority to: adopt a decision regarding the listing in Annex 10-B referred to in paragraph 3 of Article 10.17 (System of Protection of Geographical Indications) ; and amend Annex 10-B in accordance with Article 10.18 (Amendment of List of Geographical Indications). Sub-Section D Designs Article 10.24 Requirements for Protection of Registered Designs 20 1. The Parties shall provide for the protection of independently created designs that are new or original. 21 This protection shall be provided by registration and shall confer 20 21 For the purposes of Sub-Section (Designs), the Union also grants protection to the unregistered design when it meets the requirements of Council Regulation (EC) No. 6/2002 of 12 December 2001 on Community designs, as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No. 1891/2006 of 18 December 2006. The Parties agree that when the domestic law of a Party so provides, individual character of designs can also be required. This refers to designs that significantly differ from known designs or combinations of 11

exclusive rights upon their holders in accordance with the provisions of Sub-Section D (Designs). 22 2. Design protection shall not extend to designs dictated essentially by technical or functional considerations. 3. A design right shall not subsist in a design which is contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality. 23 Article 10.25 Rights Conferred by Registration The owner of a protected design shall have the right to prevent third parties, not having the owner s consent, from at least making, offering for sale, selling or importing articles bearing or embodying a design which is a copy, or substantially a copy, of the protected design, when such acts are undertaken for commercial purposes. Article 10.26 Term of Protection The term of protection available shall amount to at least ten years from the date of application. Article 10.27 Exceptions The Parties may provide limited exceptions to the protection of designs, provided that such exceptions do not unreasonably conflict with the normal exploitation of protected designs and do not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the owner of the protected design, taking account of the legitimate interests of third parties. Article 10.28 Relationship to Copyright The Parties shall offer the possibility that a design registered in a Party in accordance with Sub-Section D (Designs) is not completely precluded from enjoying protection under the domestic law of copyright of that Party. The extent to which, and the conditions under which, such protection is enjoyed shall be determined by that Party. 24 Sub-Section E 22 23 24 known designs features. The Union considers designs to have individual character if the overall impression it produces on the informed users differs from the overall impression produced on such a user by any design which has been made available to the public. It is understood that designs are not excluded from protection simply on the basis that they constitute a part of an article or product, provided that they are visible, fulfil the criteria of this paragraph, and: fulfil any other criteria for design protection; and are not otherwise excluded from design protection, under the Parties respective domestic law. Nothing in this Article precludes either Party from providing other specified exclusions from design protection under its domestic law. The Parties understand that such exclusions shall not be extensive. In the case of Singapore, the extent to which, and the conditions under which, such protection is enjoyed include the circumstances under section 74 of Singapore s Copyright Act. 12

Patents Article 10.29 International Agreements The Parties recall the obligations under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (done at Washington on June 19, 1970, amended on September 28, 1979, modified on February 3, 1984). The Parties shall, where appropriate, make all reasonable efforts to comply with Article 1 to Article 16 of the Patent Law Treaty (adopted in Geneva on June 1, 2000) in a manner consistent with their domestic law and procedures. Article 10.30 Patents and Public Health 1. The Parties recognise the importance of the Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health, adopted on 14 November, 2001 by the Ministerial Conference of the WTO, at Doha. In interpreting and implementing the rights and obligations under Sub-Section E (Patents) and Sub-Section F (Protection of Test Data Submitted to Obtain an Administrative Marketing Approval to put a Pharmaceutical Product on the Market), the Parties shall ensure consistency with this Declaration. 2. The Parties shall respect the Decision of the WTO General Council of 30 August 2003 on Implementation of Paragraph 6 of the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health, as well as the Decision of the WTO General Council of 6 December 2005 on Amendment of the TRIPS Agreement, adopting the Protocol Amending the TRIPS Agreement. Article 10.31 Extension of the Duration of the Rights Conferred by a Patent The Parties recognise that pharmaceutical products 25 protected by a patent in their respective territories may be subject to an administrative marketing approval process before being put on their respective markets. The Parties shall make available an extension of the duration of the rights conferred by the patent protection to compensate the patent owner for the reduction in the effective patent life as a result of the administrative marketing approval process. 26 The extension of the duration of the rights conferred by the patent protection may not exceed five years. 27 25 26 27 For the purposes of this Article and Article 10.33 (Protection of Test Data Submitted to Obtain an Administrative Marketing Approval to put a Pharmaceutical Product on the Market), the term pharmaceutical product shall be defined for each Party, by the respective legislations of the Parties as at the date of signature of this Agreement. In the case of the Union, the term pharmaceutical product refers to medicinal product. Singapore undertakes to make available an extension of the duration of the rights conferred by patent protection to compensate the patent owner for the reduction in the effective patent life as the result of the administrative marketing approval process to substances for diagnosis or testing and authorised as a medicinal product. The conditions and procedures for the provision of the extension of the patent term shall be determined by the respective legislations of the Parties. This is without prejudice to a possible extension for paediatric purposes, if provided for by either Party. 13

Article 10.32 Cooperation The Parties agree to cooperate on initiatives to facilitate: the granting of patents on the basis of applications filed by applicants of a Party in the other Party; and the qualification and recognition of patent agent professionals of a Party in the territory of the other Party. Sub-Section F Protection of Test Data Article 10.33 Protection of Test Data Submitted to Obtain an Administrative Marketing Approval to put a Pharmaceutical Product on the Market When a Party requires the submission of test data or studies concerning the safety and efficacy of a pharmaceutical product prior to granting approval for the marketing of such product, the Party shall not, for a period of at least five years from the date of approval in that Party, permit third parties to market the same or a similar product, on the basis of the marketing approval granted to the party which had provided the test data or studies, unless the 28, 29, 30 party which had provided the test data or studies has given its consent. Article 10.34 Protection of Test Data Submitted to Obtain an Administrative Marketing Approval to put an Agricultural Chemical Product 31 on the Market 1. When a Party requires the submission of test data or studies concerning the safety and efficacy of an agricultural chemical product prior to granting approval for the 28 29 30 31 The conditions and procedures for the provision of the protection contemplated under this Article shall be determined by the respective legislations of the Parties. The Parties shall, five years after the entry into force of this Agreement, initiate without prejudice discussions on the possible extension of the duration of the protection of test data submitted to obtain an administrative marketing approval to put a pharmaceutical product on the market. In the context of this Article, it is understood that such confidential supporting test data or studies shall not be used for the purposes of determining whether to grant any other application for a period of at least five years: in the case of Singapore, from the date that the first application is received; in the case of the Union, from the date of approval of the first application, unless the party which had provided the test data or studies has given his consent. In the case of the Union, for the purposes of this Article, agricultural chemical products means active substances and preparations containing one or more active substances, put up in the form in which they are supplied to the user, intended to: protect plants or plant products against all harmful organisms or prevent the action of such organisms, in so far as such substances or preparations are not otherwise defined in subparagraphs to (e); influence the life processes of plants, other than as a nutrient (e.g. plant growth regulators); (c) preserve plant products, in so far as such substances or products are not subject to special Council or Commission provisions on preservatives; (d) destroy undesirable plants; or (e) destroy parts of plants, check or prevent undesirable growth of plants. 14

marketing of such product in that Party, the Party shall not, for a period of at least ten years from the date of approval, permit third parties to market the same or a similar product, on the basis of the marketing approval granted to the party which had provided the test data or studies, unless the party which had provided the test data or studies has given its consent. 2. Where a Party provides for measures or procedures to avoid duplicative testing on vertebrate animals with respect to agricultural chemical products, that Party may provide for the conditions and circumstances under which third parties may market the same or similar product, on the basis of the marketing approval granted to the party which had provided the test data or studies. 3. Where a Party requires the submission of test data or studies concerning the safety or efficacy of an agricultural chemical product prior granting an approval for the marketing of such product, the Party shall endeavour to make best efforts to process the application expeditiously with a view to avoiding unreasonable delays. Sub-Section G Plant Varieties Article 10.35 International Agreements The Parties reaffirm their obligations under the International Convention for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (adopted in Paris on December 2, 1961, as last revised in Geneva on March 19, 1991), including their ability to implement the optional exception to the breeder s right, as referred to in paragraph 2 of Article 15 of this Convention. SECTION C Civil Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Article 10.36 General Obligations 1. The Parties reaffirm their commitments under Articles 41 to 50 of the TRIPS Agreement and shall provide for the measures, procedures and remedies under their respective domestic law, against acts of infringement of intellectual property rights covered by this Chapter, that are in compliance with such commitments. 2. In particular, the measures, procedures and remedies referred to in paragraph 1, and provided for by each Party under its domestic law, shall: (c) (d) take into account, as appropriate, the need for proportionality between the seriousness of the infringement and the interests of third parties; be fair and equitable; not be unnecessarily complicated or costly, or entail unreasonable time limits or unwarranted delays; and be applied in such a manner as to avoid the creation of barriers to legitimate trade and to provide for safeguards against their abuse. 15

3. Nothing in this Chapter affects the capacity of either Party to enforce its domestic law in general or creates any obligation on either Party to amend its existing laws as they relate to the enforcement of intellectual property rights. Without prejudice to the foregoing general principles, nothing in this Chapter creates any obligation on either Party: to put in place a judicial system for the enforcement of intellectual property rights distinct from that for the enforcement of law in general; or with respect to the distribution of resources as between enforcement of intellectual property rights and the enforcement of law in general. Article 10.37 Publication of Judicial Decisions In civil judicial proceedings instituted for infringement of an intellectual property right, each Party shall take appropriate measures, pursuant to its domestic law and policies, to publish or make available to the public information on final judicial decisions. Nothing in this Article shall require a Party to disclose confidential information, the disclosure of which would impede law enforcement or otherwise be contrary to the public interest or would prejudice the legitimate commercial interests of particular enterprises, public or private. The Parties may provide for other additional publicity measures which are appropriate to the particular circumstances, including prominent advertising. Article 10.38 Availability of Civil Measures, Procedures and Remedies 1. The Parties shall make available, in their respective domestic law and to right holders, the civil measures, procedures and remedies referred to in Section C (Civil Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights) for the intellectual property rights as defined in paragraph 2. 2. For the purposes of Section C (Civil Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights), the following terms have the following meanings: right holders shall include exclusive licensees as well as federations and associations 32 having the legal standing to assert such rights; and intellectual property rights means all categories of intellectual property that are the subject of Sections 1 to 6 of Part II of the TRIPS Agreement. 33 Article 10.39 Measures for Preserving Evidence 1. Each Party shall provide that its judicial authorities have the authority to order prompt and effective provisional measures: 32 33 In so far as permitted by and in accordance with the provisions of the applicable law, it is understood that the phrase federations and associations includes collective rights management bodies and, in the Union context, professional defence bodies which are regularly recognised as having a right to represent holders of intellectual property rights. A Party may exclude patents from the scope of Section C (Civil Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights). 16

against a party or, where appropriate, a third party over whom the relevant judicial authority exercises jurisdiction, to prevent an infringement of any intellectual property right from occurring, and in particular to prevent goods that involve the infringement of an intellectual property right from entering into the channels of commerce; and to preserve relevant evidence in regard to the alleged infringement. 2. Each Party shall provide that its judicial authorities have the authority to adopt provisional measures inaudita altera parte where appropriate, in particular where any delay is likely to cause irreparable harm to the right holder or where there is a demonstrable risk of evidence being destroyed. In proceedings conducted inaudita altera parte, each Party shall provide its judicial authorities with the authority to act expeditiously on requests for provisional measures and to make a decision without undue delay. 3. At least in cases of copyright or related rights infringement and trademark counterfeiting, each Party shall provide that, in civil judicial proceedings, its judicial authorities have the authority to order the seizure or other taking into custody of suspect goods, and of materials and implements relevant to the act of infringement, and, at least for trademark counterfeiting, of documentary evidence, either originals or copies thereof, relevant to the infringement. 4. Each Party shall provide that its authorities have the authority to require the applicant, with respect to provisional measures, to provide any reasonably available evidence in order to satisfy themselves with a sufficient degree of certainty that the applicant s right is being infringed or that such infringement is imminent, and to order the applicant to provide a security or equivalent assurance sufficient to protect the defendant and to prevent abuse. Such security or equivalent assurance shall not unreasonably deter recourse to procedures for such provisional measures. 5. Where the provisional measures are revoked, or where they lapse due to any act or omission by the applicant, or where it is subsequently found that there has been no infringement of an intellectual property right, the judicial authorities shall have the authority to order the applicant, upon request of the defendant, to provide the defendant appropriate compensation for any injury caused by those measures. Article 10.40 Evidence and Right of Information 1. Without prejudice to each Party s domestic law governing privilege, the protection of confidentiality or the processing of personal data, each Party shall provide that, in civil judicial proceedings concerning the enforcement of intellectual property rights, its judicial authorities have the authority, upon a justified request of the right holder, to order the infringer or, in the alternative, the alleged infringer, to provide, to the right holder or to the judicial authorities, at least for the purpose of collecting evidence, relevant information as provided for in its applicable laws and regulations that the infringer or alleged infringer possesses or controls. 2. The relevant information referred to in paragraph 1 may include information regarding any person involved in any aspect of the infringement or alleged infringement and regarding the means of production or the channels of distribution of the infringing or allegedly infringing goods or services, including the identification of third persons alleged to be involved in the production and distribution of such goods or services and of their channels of distribution. 17

Article 10.41 Other Remedies 1. Each Party shall provide that, in civil judicial proceedings where a judicial decision is taken finding an infringement of a right holder s intellectual property right, its judicial authorities shall, upon application by the right holder, have the authority to, at least with respect to pirated copyright goods and counterfeit trademark goods: order that such infringing goods be: (i) (ii) destroyed, except in exceptional circumstances; or disposed of outside the channels of commerce in such a manner as to avoid any harm caused to the right holder, without compensation of any sort; and order that materials and implements, the predominant use of which has been in the manufacture or creation of such infringing goods, shall be, without undue delay and without compensation of any sort, destroyed or disposed of outside the channels of commerce in such a manner as to minimise the risks of further infringements. 2. In considering any application by a right holder, as referred to in paragraph 1, the need for proportionality between the seriousness of the infringement and the remedies ordered as well as the interests of third parties shall be taken into account. 3. The remedies under this Article may be carried out at the expense of the infringer. Article 10.42 Injunctions Each Party shall provide that, in civil judicial proceedings where a judicial decision is taken finding an infringement of a right holder s intellectual property right, its judicial authorities shall, upon application by the right holder, have the authority to issue against the infringer or, where appropriate, against a third party over whom the relevant judicial authority exercises jurisdiction, an injunction aimed at prohibiting the continuation of the infringement. Where provided for by the Party s domestic law, non-compliance with an injunction shall, where appropriate, be subject to a recurring penalty payment with a view to ensuring compliance. Article 10.43 Alternative Measures Each Party may provide in its domestic law that, in civil judicial proceedings where a judicial decision is taken finding an infringement of a right holder s intellectual property right, in appropriate cases and on application by the person liable to be subject to the measures provided for in Article 10.41 (Other Remedies) and/or Article 10.42 (Injunctions), its judicial authorities have the authority to order pecuniary compensation to be paid to the injured party instead of applying the measures provided for in Article 10.41 (Other Remedies) and/or Article 10.42 (Injunctions), if that person acted unintentionally and without negligence, and if 18