Sources of Liability

Similar documents
LIABILITY UNDER THE TEXAS TORT CLAIMS ACT

Why Would A Specialist Be Sued?

IMMUNITY OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AND GOVERNMENT PERSONNEL FROM LAWSUITS IN NORTH CAROLINA. Trey Allen UNC School of Government October 2013

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA TRANSPORTATION COMPENDIUM OF LAW

MUNICIPAL AND PERSONAL LIABILITY UNDER THE TENNESSEE TORT LIABILITY ACT MADE SIMPLE MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEE AND BOARDS IMMUNITY/LIABILITY

MUNICIPAL TORT LIABILITY GENERAL LAWS CHAPTER 258

Board of Claims -- Limitation on damage awards -- Hearing officers -- Asbestos related claims. (1) A Board of Claims, composed of the members

ROBBY NIESE OPINION BY v. Record No JUSTICE DONALD W. LEMONS June 7, 2002 CITY OF ALEXANDRIA

Case 3:14-cv BR Document 1 Filed 10/09/14 Page 1 of 7

CODE OFFICIAL LIABILITY

Ordinances & Ordinance Books: The Basics. Basic Rule

Business Law Tort Law Unit Textbook

OAKLAND UNIVERSITY PARALEGAL PROGRAM SYLLABUS. CEPL Substantive Law: TORTS

NEGLIGENCE. All four of the following must be demonstrated for a legal claim of negligence to be successful:

Filing # E-Filed 01/09/ :13:29 PM

Tort Liability. July 11, Call in number: Pass Code: #

Casebook pages Chapter 9: Battery, Assault & False Imprisonment. Battery

Professor DeWolf Summer 2014 Torts August 18, 2014 SAMPLE ANSWER TO FINAL EXAM MULTIPLE CHOICE

Rivas v City of New York 2019 NY Slip Op 30318(U) February 7, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2017 Judge: Alexander M.

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA TRANSPORTATION COMPENDIUM OF LAW

Ross: Civil Liability in Criminal Justice, 6th Edition

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CENTRAL BRANCH -- UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

TITLE 29. Torts Ordinance. Chapter General Provisions

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals

THOMAS L. ROBERTSON OPINION BY v. Record No JUSTICE CLEO E. POWELL January 10, 2014 WESTERN VIRGINIA WATER AUTHORITY

ELEMENTS OF LIABILITY AND RISK

MBE WORKSHOP: TORTS PROFESSOR LISA MCELROY DREXEL UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.1 GENERAL RIGHT OF ACTION UNDER C.R.S LIMITED RIGHT OF ACTION UNDER C.R.S

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TRANSPORTATION COMPENDIUM OF LAW

Department of State Health Services. Summary of Statutory Provisions Affecting the Liability of Providers in a Public Health Emergency September 2009

Julian Pardo de Zela's Representative Experience

CED: An Overview of the Law

Case 3:13-cv RBL Document 31 Filed 09/17/13 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA ORDER

III. Claimant means any person who files a claim pursuant to this chapter.

[*1]Richard M. Metz, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Mary Helen Metz, Deceased, et al., Respondents,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1 Article 5 1

EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP LIABILITY OF EMPLOYER FOR NEGLIGENCE IN HIRING, SUPERVISION OR RETENTION 1 OF AN EMPLOYEE.

IC Chapter 2. Powers and Duties

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 H 2 HOUSE BILL 117 Committee Substitute Favorable 4/4/17

Sections 4(k), 5. Section 2, 3(A) Scope. Money Transmitters

Don t Step in It! Premises Liability Law in Wisconsin: What to Look Out for Including the Statute of Repose, Safe Place Law, and Recreational Immunity

2013 YEAR IN REVIEW SIGNIFICANT DECISIONS IN 2013: LOCAL GOVERNMENT CASE LAW UPDATE. By Stephen D. Henninger

HYDERALLY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

THE COMMON LAW LIBRARY CLERK & LINDSELL TORTS TWENTIETH EDITION

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA Filed: 6 October 2015

How to Use Tort Immunity to the Advantage of Your Local Government

Case 2:06-cv FSH-PS Document 20 Filed 01/10/08 Page 1 of 7

The Above Blank Space Is for Recording Purposes.

Weimar v City of Mount Vernon 2013 NY Slip Op 34129(U) January 17, 2013 Supreme Court, Westchester County Docket Number: 67079/12 Judge: Mary H.

CITY OF DELANO PUBLIC FACILITIES LEASE AGREEMENT NON EXCLUSIVE USE

Checklist of Points to be Covered for Complete Answers FSM Bar Examination, August 5, 2004

Case 3:18-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 11

Plaintiffs, by their attorney, NORA CONSTANCE MARINO, ESQ. complaining of the defendants herein, respectfully show this Court, and allege

ANIMAL PROTECTION LAWS OF GEORGIA

A PLAINTIFF S GUIDE TO CIVIL IMMUNITY

WINFIELD TORT EIGHTH EDITION J. A. JOLOWICZ, M.A.

to redress his civil and legal rights, and alleges as follows: 1. Plaintiff, Anthony Truchan, is a resident of Nutley, New Jersey.

Checklist XX - Sources of Municipal and Personal Liability and Immunity. Subject matter MA COTA Maintenance of highways and bridges

Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California. Law & Order Code TITLE 3 TORTS. [Last Amended 10/1/04. Current Through 2/3/09.]

Building Inspector to be Appointed. Enforcement of Building Code; Authority of Inspector to Enter Buildings. Plans to Accompany Application.

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff. vs. ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF BOSTON, A CORPORATION SOLE; JOSEPH FLYNN; J. KEVIN MCANDREWS, Defendants

Chapter 8 - Common Law

Summons SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WAYNE X

Understanding the RM Process

Helen accepts instructions for claimants and defendants in commercial, chancery, public law, clinical negligence, and personal injury matters.

Particular Crimes can be grouped under 3 headings: Crimes against people Crimes against property Crimes against business interests

STORMWATER UTILITY MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT

NO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 7 May Tort Claims Act negligence insufficient findings of fact contributory negligence

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1 Article 5 1

JUNE 2007 LAW REVIEW COMMERCIAL WAIVER SIGNED BY PARENT

Coroners Act. Purpose: Where the Act Applies: How the Act Works

SPRING 2009 May 7, 2009 FINAL EXAM SAMPLE ANSWER MULTIPLE CHOICE

Canadian Systems of Law Contract and Tort Law for Professionals There are two systems of law that operate in Canada: Common Law and Civil Law.

Sexual Assault Civil Protection Orders (CPOs) By State 6/2009

The following papers numbered 1 to 3 were marked fully

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. Plaintiff, v. Case No. 04-C-0986

S10A1267. JOINER et al. v. GLENN. Glenn filed suit against Joiner, the Mayor of Jefferson, Georgia, the

AIA Government Affairs Good Samaritan State Statute Compendium

Liability for criminal acts of employees

PRECIS OF THE REPORT INTO THE DISMISSAL OF DEPUTY HEADMASTER, ROHAN BROWN

THREE LESSONS ABOUT LEGAL LIABILITIES OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT ELECTED OFFICIALS

Case 2:13-cv CG-WPL Document 17 Filed 09/18/13 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

NEGLIGENCE Crawford Adjusters Canada Incorporated

Raphael Theokary v. USA

Case 1:13-cv MKB-RER Document 1 Filed 01/04/13 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1. Plaintiff, Defendants. REYES, M.J PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 130PA17. Filed 26 October On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. 7A-31 of a unanimous decision

Assembly Bill No. 32 Committee on Natural Resources, Agriculture, and Mining

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF SHELBY COUNTY, TENNESSEE FOR THE THIRTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT MEMPHIS

CHAPTER 9 BUILDING REGULATIONS

Courthouse News Service

Small Claims 101: or Defend It

STATE SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY & TORT CAPS. Kirk Mylander, CIS General Counsel Gary Wickert, Matthiesen, Wickert & Lehrer, S.C.

ANSWER A TO ESSAY QUESTION 5

FIRE SAFETY. The Fire Safety Act. being. Chapter F-15.11* of The Statutes of Saskatchewan, (effective November 2, 2015).

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/04/ :53 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 17 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/04/2016

Supreme Court of Florida

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, DEANNA HALLIDAY, by and through her undersigned counsel, brings this

Transcription:

Civil Liability of Local Governments, Public Officials, & Public Employees Trey Allen Clerks Certification Institute March 2016 Sources of Liability U.S. Constitution & N.C. Constitution Federal & state statutes Federal & state regulations Tort law 1

Sources of Liability: Constitutional Rights Local Gov t liability for violations of U.S. Constitution Liability of Local Gov t employees for violations of U.S. Constitution Attorney s Fees Liability of Local Gov t and its employees for violations of N.C. Constitution Sources of Liability: Constitutional Rights (cont d) Right to Due Process Right to Just Compensation for Property Taken for Public Use 2

Sources of Liability: Tort Law Tort = wrongful conduct (other than a breach of contract) for which a victim may be entitled to recover money damages in a civil action. Most torts originate in common law. Intentional misconduct or negligence can support tort claim. Employer Liability for Employee Torts Employee action must be within scope of employment. Rule applies to government and private employers. Why sue employers? Local governments as employers 3

Sources of Liability: Tort Law (cont d) Assault = intentional placing of a person in reasonable apprehension of imminent harmful or offensive contact Sources of Liability: Tort Law (cont d) Battery = intentional harmful or offensive touching of another person against the person s will 4

Common Defenses to Intentional Torts Consent Statute of Limitations Self-defense or defense of others Sources of Liability: Tort Law (cont d) Negligence = failure to exercise reasonable care in the performance of a legal duty owed to another under the circumstances 5

Sources of Liability: Tort Law (cont d) Negligent Hiring, Supervision, Retention = specific tortious act by the employee; the employee's incompetence or unfitness; the employer's actual or constructive notice of the employee's incompetency or unfitness; injury resulting from the employee s incompetency or unfitness. Sources of Liability: Tort Law (cont d) Negligent Misrepresentation = plaintiff justifiably relies on info prepared w/o reasonable care by one who owed the plaintiff a duty of care. 6

Common Defenses to Negligence Claims Contributory Negligence Intervening Cause Statute of Limitations Governmental Immunity Sovereign Immunity Governmental Immunity 7

Governmental Immunity (cont d) The Doctrine of Governmental Immunity bars tort claims against local gov ts arising from negligence or intentional misconduct of their personnel in performance of governmental functions. It does not bar tort claims for injuries arising from proprietary functions. Governmental Immunity (cont d) Governmental v. Proprietary Functions Governmental function = discretionary, political, or legislative in nature; performed for the public good on behalf of the State. Proprietary function = commercial or chiefly for the private advantage of the compact community. Test from Williams v. Pasquotank County 8

Governmental Immunity (cont d) Sample Governmental Functions Sample Proprietary Functions Sample Governmental Functions Performance of law enforcement duties Decision to construct sewer system Building inspection Tax collection Sample Proprietary Functions Collection of parking fines Responding to fire call Operation of water system that sells water for public consumption Operation of municipal sewer system which charges fees as public enterprise Operation of municipal golf course Operation of municipal arena or civic center Business interactions with private contractors Operation of hospital Erection & maintenance of jail Operation of public library Use of public park to generate revenue Operation of municipal airport Governmental Immunity (cont d) General Rule = Local government liability for unsafe premises depends on whether property is being used for a governmental or proprietary function. What about multi-use property? Bynum v. Wilson County 9

Governmental Immunity (cont d) Local gov t may waive governmental immunity by Purchasing liability insurance or Participating in governmental risk pool. Public Duty Doctrine General Rule = Gov t has no duty to protect specific individuals. Doctrine has can bar negligence claims over local law enforcement s alleged failure to protect claimants from third parties. As applied to local gov ts, doctrine is limited to law enforcement departments exercising their general duty to protect the public. 10

Official Capacity v. Individual Capacity Claims Official Capacity Claim = claim against unit of gov t. Individual Capacity Claim = claim directly against public official or employee. Public Official Immunity Doctrine bars tort claims against public officials in their individual capacities for acts undertaken within the scope of their duties unless they act maliciously or corruptly. Doctrine does not protect public employees. 11

Public Official Immunity (cont d) Public official Office created by constitution or statute Takes oath of office Exercises discretion in performance of duties Exercises sovereign power of state Public employee Duties are ministerial in nature Public Official Immunity (cont d) Examples of Public Officials Elected Official Sheriff Deputy Sheriff County/City Manager Police Chief Police Officer DSS Director Coroner EMS Director Chief Building Inspector Building Inspector Superintendent Principal Assistant Principal Notary Public County Health Director Animal Control Officer Medical Examiner 12

Public Official Immunity (cont d) Examples of Public Employees Street Sweepers Emergency Medical Technicians Environmental Health Specialists Public School Teachers Other Immunities Legislative Immunity: Local officials have absolute immunity from claims arising from their actions if - they were acting in a legislative capacity when the incident resulting in injury occurred, and - their acts were not illegal. LI doesn t apply to administrative decisions. Most decisions to hire/fire specific individuals fall into this category. 13

Other Immunities (cont d) Judicial Immunity: Applies to local officials when they act in a quasijudicial manner. Defense of Local Gov t Personnel Payment of employee s legal costs Payment of judgment against employee 14

Questions? Trey Allen UNC School of Government 919-843-9019 tallen@sog.unc.edu 15