CRIMINAL PRE-TRIAL BEST PRACTICES

Similar documents
CRIMINAL JURY TRIAL JUDGE S MANUAL

MINNESOTA JUDICIAL TRAINING UPDATE

EVIDENCE, FOUNDATIONS AND OBJECTIONS. Laurie Vahey, Esq.

HOW A CRIMINAL CASE PROCEEDS IN FLORIDA

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 49 1

Department 16 has prepared this document to assist counsel in scheduling motions and reporters in Department 16.

TRIAL ADVOCACY - FALL 2005

Fall, Criminal Litigation 9/4/17. Criminal Litigation: Arraignment to Appeal. How Do We Get A Case?

Criminal Law Table of Contents

MINNESOTA JUDICIAL TRAINING UPDATE GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS: EVERYTHING A JUDGE NEEDS TO KNOW - ALMOST

Overview of Pretrial & Trial Procedure. Basic Concepts. What is Proof (Evidence) David Hamilton City Attorney Reno & Honey Grove Tx.

Insight from Carlton Fields

OUTLINE OF CRIMINAL COURT PROCESS

Criminal Litigation: Step-By-Step

Wyoming Judges Benchbook

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

JUROR INSTRUCTIONS ALONG W/ QUESTIONS & ANSWERS FOR POTENTIAL JURORS

Criminal Litigation: Step-By-Step

INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES OF JUDGE LOUIS L. STANTON

Keith Berkshire Berkshire Law Office, PLLC

Vermont Bar Association Seminar Materials. 62nd Mid-Year Meeting. Criminal Law 101

Insight from Carlton Fields Jorden Burt

PREPARING FOR TRIAL. 3. Opponent s experts identified, complete Rule 26 responses received and, if possible and necessary, experts have been deposed.

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

LIST OF CHAPTERS. Joseph J. Mellon, Esq. Thomas J. Tomazin, Esq. Lorraine E. Parker, Esq. Lauren E. Sykes, Esq. Krista Maher, Esq.

acquittal: Judgment that a criminal defendant has not been proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

PRESERVING THE RECORD ON APPEAL

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND EVIDENCE ATTACHED ARE 11

The court process CONSUMER GUIDE. How the criminal justice system works. FROM ATTORNEY GENERAL JEREMIAH W. (JAY) NIXON

American Criminal Law and Procedure Vocabulary

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CLERMONT COUNTY, OHIO

JUDGE: Paul Maughan - Third District Court

TRIAL PRACTICE No SPRING 2012

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Court Records Glossary

STATE OF GEORGIA PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR CRIMINAL DEFENSE REPRESENTATION IN INDIGENT CRIMINAL CASES

P R E T R I A L O R D E R

14 Guilty Pleas. Part A. Introduction GUILTY PLEAS IN JUVENILE COURT

CAUSE NUMBER 00 THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE COUNTY CRIMINAL V. COURT AT LAW NUMBER 00 DEFENDANT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

Trial Date and Time. In some cases, the Police Department and the defendant will reach a plea agreement in lieu of going to trial.

QUESTIONNAIRE FOR JUDGE/COMMISSIONER BENCH BOOK. JUDGE/COMMISSIONER: Jennifer Valencia Second District Court

An Introduction. to the. Federal Public Defender s Office. for the Districts of. South Dakota and North Dakota

P R E T R I A L O R D E R

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE. JUDGE MELISSA R. McCORMICK DEPARTMENT C13. CLERK: Alma Bovard COURT ATTENDANT: As Assigned

New Jersey Rules of Evidence Article VI - Witnesses

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON C ATLANTA JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF GEORGIA * * * JUDGE SHAWN ELLEN LaGRUA

Pretrial Activities and the Criminal Trial

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Chapter 6. Litigation Process (Federal and State) Now that you know about the structure of the court system, now you will learn about the process.

DEPARTMENT C26 GUIDELINES HONORABLE GREGORY H. LEWIS

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL DIVISION COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : : VS. : NO. : :

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...17 FORWARD...23

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF JACKSON BUSINESS COURT DIVISION. via telephone (check one) /

Amendments to Rules of Criminal Procedure Affecting District Court Procedures

Federal Adaptation of NLADA s Performance Guidelines For Criminal Defense Representations 1

JUDGE GABRIELLE N. SANDERS Courtroom Guidelines, Procedures and Expectations For Osceola County Civil Division 60-G, Courtroom 4B

Criminal Procedure Outline

OBJECTION YOUR HONOUR!

EMPIRION EVIDENCE ORDINANCE

MISSOURI CIRCUIT COURT TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUITS DIVISION 12 JURY TRIAL GUIDELINES AND DIVISION RULES

Case 9:01-cv MHS-KFG Document 72 Filed 08/16/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1935

CROSS EXAMINATION AND IMPEACHMENT AS PRACTICE TOOLS. Traci A. Owens

COMMONWEALTH vs. SCOTT E. FIELDING. No. 18-P-342. Dukes. November 13, January 29, Present: Milkey, Henry, & Englander, JJ.

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 8 CRIMINAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Rule 605. Competency of judge as witness. NC General Statutes - Chapter 8C Article 6 1

Dodge County. 1) Rules of Decorum. (Sixth Judicial District)

MISSOURI CIRCUIT COURT TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT DIVISION 5 JURY TRIAL GUIDELINES PRETRIAL MOTIONS COURTROOM RULES AND DECORUM

Follow the instructions in each section carefully. Please ensure that your responses are legible.

SS.7.C.3.3 and SS.7.C.3.8 Judicial Branch: Article III

NOTE WELL: See provisions pertaining to convening an investigative grand jury noted in N.C. Gen. Stat. 15A-622(h).

What s Your Theory of Admissibility: Character Evidence, Habit, and Prior Conduct

THE ANSWER BOOK FOR JURY SERVICE

Special Thanks to Daisy Espinoza Administrative Court Clerk, Tarrant County

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PASCO COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION. Case No. 51-

This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014).

TEXAS CRIMINAL DEFENSE FORMS ANNOTATED

Delinquency Hearings

Fundamentals of Civil Litigation in Federal Court

LOCAL RULES FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT AND THE COUNTY COURT-AT-LAW RUSK COUNTY, TEXAS

CRIMINAL CASE CHECKLIST (State Court)

THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR CHARLOTTE COUNTY,

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

LEWIS A. KAPLAN United States District Judge United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007

2:15-cr VAR-MKM Doc # 10 Filed 09/24/15 Pg 1 of 5 Pg ID 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Alpena County. Version 1.0 JURY DUTY HANDBOOK

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

PRETRIAL ORDER (JURY TRIALS)

RULES FOR LOUISIANA DISTRICT COURTS. TITLES I, II, and III Twenty-Seventh Judicial District Court Parish of St. Landry

This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014).

Argumentative Questions (Badgering) Assuming Facts Not in Evidence (Extrapolation) Irrelevant Evidence Hearsay Opinion Lack of Personal Knowledge

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT FIVE JUDGE COLLEEN K. STERNE. Departmental Requirements and Procedures

Judicial Assistant s > ALWAYS copy opposing counsel(s) on correspondence to the Court

Juvenile Scripts SCRIPT FOR DETENTION HEARING...2 SCRIPT FOR AN ADJUDICATION HEARING IN WHICH THE RESPONDENT PLEADS TRUE...7

CHARACTERS IN THE COURTROOM

JUDGE J. BRIAN JOHNSON CIVIL PRE-TRIAL AND TRIAL PROCEDURES FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE J. BRIAN JOHNSON. (Revised February 8, 2018)

TRIAL PRACTICE No SPRING 2016

TAKING AND DEFENDING DEPOSITION September 26, :00-1:00 p.m. Presenter: Thomasina F. Moore, Esq.

A JUDGE S PERSPECTIVE ON EVIDENCE. (Basic Tools of Your New Trade) W. David Lee. Senior Resident Superior Court Judge.

Learning Station #5 LEVEL ONE-13

Transcription:

CRIMINAL PRE-TRIAL BEST PRACTICES 20 PRE-TRIAL TOPICS EVERY ATTORNEY SHOULD BE PREPARED TO DISCUSS 48 TH ANNUAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE INSTITUTE August 26, 2013 JUDGE ALAN PENDLETON

TRIAL ATTORNEY DEDICATION The credit belongs to the person actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, who spends himself at a worthy cause, who at best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement and if he fails, at least fails daring greatly so that his place shall never be with those cold, timid souls who know neither victory nor defeat.

PRE-TRIAL CHECKLIST BEFORE TRIAL IN CHAMBERS See Criminal Jury Trial Judge s Manual and Judicial Training Updates; Discuss Checklist in Chambers; Put discussion on record outside presence of jury, but in presence of def

PRE-TRIAL CHECKLIST 1. Scheduling and Conflicts: Anticipated length of trial; 2. Witness lists - Court needs master list to read to jury; Need for Interpreter?

PRE-TRIAL CHECKLIST 3. SEQUESTRATION (WITNESS & JURY) Make record of parties request; What if sequestration is violated? Case Agent Exception (MRE 615); Sequestration is at courts discretion;

PRE-TRIAL CHECKLIST VOIR DIRE OF DELIBERATING JURY: 1. Did anyone try to contact you over the weekend to discuss this case? 2. Did any of you talk to each other over the weekend about this case? 3. Did you speak with anyone else about this case? 4. Did anyone do any research about the case or any issues raised in it? 5. Did anyone drive past or visit any of the locations mentioned in this case? State v. Sanders, 376 N.W.2d 196 ( Minn. 1985)

PRE-TRIAL CHECKLIST 4. JURY INSTRUCTIONS - DISCUSSION: CrimJig 1.01 Keep Or Delete Because Defendant May Have Been Arrested ; Anticipated Cautionary Instructions; Instruction on Lesser Included Offense; Accomplice Instruction (CrimJig 3.18)

PRE-TRIAL CHECKLIST 5. CHARGES AND ARRAIGNMENT Confirm charges amendments? Confirm defendant previously arraigned and plead not guilty

PRE-TRIAL CHECKLIST 6. STIPULATIONS AND/ OR ADMISSIONS: Testimonial; Foundation; Evidentiary.

STIPULATION TO ELEMENT OF OFFENSE PROBLEM A COMMON TRIAL MISTAKE IS FAILURE TO OBTAIN A PERSONAL WAIVER OF THE RIGHT TO JURY TRIAL WHEN DEFENDANT STIPULATES TO AN ELEMENT OF THE OFFENSE.

STIPULATION TO ELEMENT OF OFFENSE FOR EXAMPLE: Enhanced Gross Misdemeanor Or Felony Prosecutions (DUI, Assault, OFP, Firearm or Drugs); Most Defendants Willing To Stipulate To Prior Conviction.

STIPULATION TO ELEMENT OF OFFENSE MANDATORY RULE: TO STIPULATE TO AN ELEMENT DEFENDANT MUST PERSONALLY WAIVE HIS TRIAL RIGHT EITHER ORALLY OR IN WRITING.

STIPULATION TO ELEMENT OF OFFENSE JUDICIAL RULE OF THUMB: THINK OF STIPULATION AS DEFENDANT PLEADING GUILTY TO THAT SPECIFIC ELEMENT OF THE OFFENSE.

STIPULATION TO ELEMENT OF OFFENSE JURY INSTRUCTION: Make sure jury instruction does not inadvertently mention the prior conviction.

PRE-TRIAL CHECKLIST 7. JEOPARDY ATTACHES ONCE JURY IS SWORN: Trial goes forward if defendant is late or fails to appear; BUT FIRST; 3 Step Process to Follow; Mistrial Deadlocked Jury.

PRE-TRIAL CHECKLIST 8. DEFENDANT S RIGHT NOT TO TESTIFY CrimJig 3.17, Make A Clear Record Of Defendant s Decision

PRE-TRIAL CHECKLIST 9. DISCOVERY ISSUES Both parties in compliance and nothing pending. Mn.R.Crim.Pro. 9.01 and 9.02.

PRE-TRIAL CHECKLIST 10. AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES Is defendant raising any defense other than not guilty; Rule 9.02 Subd 1(5); Make clear record in misdemeanor cases since rule 9.01 & 9.02 does not apply to misdemeanors; Burden of Initial Production v. Burden of Proof.

PRE-TRIAL CHECKLIST 11. WITNESS INCRIMINATION ISSUES AND IMMUNITY 5 th amendment advisory? Granting of Immunity: Derivative Use Immunity; Transactional Immunity Promises or inducements

Isn t it true you were offered a special deal by the prosecutor, in exchange for your testimony?

PRE-TRIAL CHECKLIST 12. SECURITY AND CUSTODY ISSUES HOW QUICKLY A COURTROOM PROCEEDING CAN TURN FROM CALM AND ORDER TO COMPLETE AND DANGEROUS CHOAS.

PRE-TRIAL CHECKLIST Defendant MUST NOT be jail clothing; Defendant MUST NOT be in restraints without a hearing and proper findings Cautionary Instruction (visible restraints); Mn.R.Crim.Pro. 26.03, subd. 2d.

PRE-TRIAL CHECKLIST 13. USE OF WEAPONS/HAZARDOUS EXHIBITS DURING TRIAL Review Local Weapons/Hazardous Exhibits In The Courtroom Policy Notify bailiff before bringing weapon/hazardous exhibits into courtroom

PRE-TRIAL CHECKLIST 14. OPENING STATEMENT Will Defense give it after the state or reserve it; Use of Demonstrative exhibits or Evidence Display Systems

PRE-TRIAL CHECKLIST 15. EXHIBITS a. Premark exhibits; b. Have exhibits been examined? c. Foundation objection be prepared to state where foundation is lacking.

PRE-TRIAL CHECKLIST d) Request to voir dire witness to lay foundation for objection; e) Use of technology during trial; (Projectors, Document Cameras, PowerPoint) f) Location of exhibits during trial and after admission (offer, receive, give to court).

PRE-TRIAL CHECKLIST 17. PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT Reducing the incidence of prosecutorial misconduct is a shared obligation and trial courts have a duty to intervene and caution the prosecutor, even in the absence of objection. State v. Ramey, 721 N.W.2d 294 (Minn. 2007).

Defendant is a would be punk with a pathetic little life!

IMPROPER ARGUMENT- DISREGARD THAT LAST STATEMENT!

PRE-TRIAL CHECKLIST 18. MOTIONS IN LIMINE USE OF PRIOR CONVICTION FOR IMPEACHMENT. BALANCING TEST; FIVE (5) JONES FACTORS.

IMPEACHMENT BALANCING TEST: shall be admitted only if the court determines that the probative value of admitting this evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect. MRE 609 (a) (1)

IMPEACHMENT 5 SPECIFIC FINDINGS: The court must address each of the five State v. Jones factors on the record.

IMPEACHMENT 1. Impeachment Value Of Prior Crime 2. Date Of Conviction And Subsequent History

IMPEACHMENT 3. Similarity Of The Past Crime To The Charged Crime; However-recent new rule: UNSPECIFIED FELONIES

IMPEACHMENT 4. Importance of Defendant s Testimony 5. The Centrality Of The Credibility Issue

IMPEACHMENT JURY INSTRUCTION (CrimJig 2.02) The evidence concerning a prior conviction of the defendant is admitted only for your consideration in deciding whether the defendant is telling the truth in this case. You must not consider this conviction as evidence of the defendant s character or conduct except as you may think it reflects on believability.

PRE-TRIAL CHECKLIST 18. MOTIONS IN LIMINE SPREIGL EVIDENCE 5 Step Process; Rule 404(b); MS 634.20; See Update 12-4; HEARSAY Rule 803-804, 807: Crawford Issues, Update 10-8; The Fool-Proof Hearsay Test, Update 13-8.

PRE-TRIAL CHECKLIST The Fool-Proof Hearsay Test 1. Ask whether the relevant purpose for offering the out-of-court statement is its truth, if the answer to that question is yes, the statement is hearsay; 2. If the answer to the question is not clearly yes, ask this next question; 3. Must the content of the out-of-court statement be believed in order to be relevant? a. If yes, the statement is hearsay. b. If no, the statement is non-hearsay.

PRE-TRIAL CHECKLIST SHUMAKER S RULINGS ON EVIDENCE An Evidentiary Manual for Minnesota Trial Judges and Attorneys By Judge Gordon Shumaker (Ret.) MinnCLE (2012)

PRE-TRIAL CHECKLIST AUTHENTICATION ISSUES: RULE 901-902; Update 13-11; (i.e. Electronic Evidence) CHARACTER EVIDENCE: Rule 404-407 & 608; EXPERTS: Rule 7.02; LAY WITNESS OPINIONS: Rule 7.01; RULE 403: Overly Prejudicial Analysis; OTHER UNUSUAL EVIDENTIARY ISSUES.

VOIR DIRE PROCEDURE BATSON CHALLENGE THE BATSON RULE: Neither the state nor defendant may make peremptory challenges that are racially or gender motivated. Discrimination in jury selection violates defendant s and juror s right to equal protection of the laws. Rule 26.02 subd 7; THREE STEP ANALYSIS: See Training Update 13-2

VOIR DIRE PROCEDURE 1. Objecting party must establish a prima facie case of purposeful discrimination; 2. Proponent of the strike has burden of articulating a race or gender neutral reason of the strike; 3. The Court must determine whether the opponent of the strike has proven purposeful discrimination.

PRE-TRIAL CHECKLIST 20. VOIR DIRE GUIDELINES 2001 Supreme Court Task Force; Long list of problems and complaints; Judges need to be more proactive to ensure proper voir dire; CREATED JUDICIAL GUIDELINES [including 6 prohibited categories]

SIX CATEGORIES 1. EDUCATING JURORS: No questions designed to educate or instruct jurors on the law or facts in the case.

2. PREDISPOSING JURORS: No questions designed to predispose jurors in favor of any person or aspect of the case.

3. SPECULATIVE QUESTIONS: You should not ask Jurors to speculate on how they might decide the case or react to any aspect of the case.

4. SEEKING COMMITMENTS: Jurors should not be asked to commit themselves to vote in a certain way.

5. REPETITIVE QUESTIONS: You should not repeat questions to which complete and clear answers have already been given.

6. ESTABLISHING RAPPORT: No questions or statements about yourself or your client designed to establish rapport with jurors.

JUDICIAL GOLDEN RULE Attorneys Are Entitled To Receive Information From Potential Jurors; Attorneys Are Not Entitled To Give Information About The Facts Or The Law In The Case.

BEST PRACTICE DISCUSS WITH JUDGE PRIOR TO TRIAL ANY QUESTIONS THAT APPEAR TO EXCEED THE SCOPE OF THE GUIDELINES.

COUNSEL! YOU SHOULD HAVE DISCUSSED THAT WITH ME PRETRIAL!

WOW, THIS ATTORNEY IS PREPARED, ORGANIZED, HIGHLY INTELLIGENT, UNQUESTIONED INTEGRITY, I LIKE THIS ATTORNEY! I RESPECT THIS ATTORNEY! I TRUST THIS ATTORNEY!

MINNESOTA JUDICIAL TRAINING UPDATES alan.pendleton@courts.state.mn.us