Case 4:18-cv RGE-SBJ Document 1 Filed 02/20/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA

Similar documents
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES. The plaintiff, David Lutz, by and through his counsel of record, Brett Dressler, Esq.

EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. ROBERT S AMERICAN GOURMET FOOD, INC., a domestic corporation; & JURY DEMAND

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN JOSE UNLIMITED JURISDICTION CASE NO.

Case 1:18-cv ECF No. 1 filed 06/20/18 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:18-cv PLM-PJG ECF No. 1 filed 09/20/18 PageID.1 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO

STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT DODGE COUNTY BRANCH

Pacer Service Center

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR POLK COUNTY. COMES NOW the plaintiff, Heather Tuttle, for a cause of action against defendant

COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

COME NOW the plaintiffs JO ANN and MICHAEL SMITH, a married couple, by and. through their attorneys of record, MARLER CLARK LLP and FRANK JENKINS LAW

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CASE NO.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA NO. COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PETITION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF CALHOUN

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF CALHOUN. Plaintiff, Case No

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON CASE NO. COMPLAINT. Plaintiffs, (Personal Injury) Defendants.

Case 3:15-cv JAH-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/14/15 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

C01:13-cv LEK-KSC Document 1 Filed 11/19/13 Page 1 of 12 PagelD 1

Case 2:16-cv BCW Document 2 Filed 12/02/16 Page 1 of 10

Case 3:10-cv B Document 1 Filed 09/10/10 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

COMPLAINT. COMES NOW the Plaintiffs, Christopher Cooper and Shelley Smith, by and through

Case 2:12-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 08/02/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 2:12-cv Document 1 Filed 06/08/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION. ClassAction.

COMPLAINT PARTIES. 1. At all times relevant hereto, Mary Montour was a resident of Adams County, Colorado.

COMPLAINT FOR PERSONAL INJURY AND UNFAIR AND DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICES

DISTRICT COURT, COUNTY OF ELBERT, STATE OF COLORADO PO Box Ute St. Kiowa CO 80117

Case 5:16-cv JGB-KK Document 1 Filed 07/07/16 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:1

FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:18-cv JAM-DB Document 1 Filed 05/11/18 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 0:17-cv WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2017 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ALBANY DIVISION

Case No. Division COMPLAINT GENERAL ALLEGATIONS

vs Case 3:16-cv JPG-PMF Document 1 Filed 04/01/16 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #1 TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

Case 2:07-cv NGG-ETB Document 6 Filed 09/06/2007 Page 1 of 32

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA WESTERN DIVISION. Defendant.

CAUSE NO TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PLAINTIFF S THIRD AMENDED PETITION

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

Strict Liability and Product Liability PRODUCT LIABILITY WARRANTY LAW

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATHENS DIVISION

STRICT LIABILITY. (1) involves serious potential harm to persons or property,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES WITH JURY DEMAND

3:18-cv MGL Date Filed 07/31/18 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION. Defendants. )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STATE OF LOUISIANA PLAINTIFFS VERSUS

2:14-cv RMG Date Filed 02/25/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/06/2010 INDEX NO /2010

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

Case 4:16-cv LLP Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 1 of 25 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Question Farmer Jones? Discuss. 3. Big Food? Discuss. -36-

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 4 Filed: 03/08/17 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:24

Case 3:14-cv L Document 1 Filed 06/18/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1

CAUSE NO. V. JUDICIAL DISTRICT DEFENDANTS. TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PETITION NOW COMES SHERRY REYNOLDS, BRANDON REYNOLDS, KATY

Case 7:10-cv ART Document 1 Filed 03/10/10 Page 1 of 12

CASE 0:17-cv JNE-FLN Document 1 Filed 08/24/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Everett Banks

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE JOHN DOE EXETER HOSPITAL COMPLAINT AND REQUEST FOR PANEL AND CLASS ACTION CERTIFICATION

Case 7:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/20/17 Page 1 of 40 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/09/16 Page 1 of 41 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY TRENTON DIVISION

Case 7:16-cv NSR Document 17 Filed 03/01/17 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Important Regulatory Developments: FDA's Reportable Food Registry and Other Reporting Obligations

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/14/17 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA COMPLAINT

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/08/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 07/25/16 Page 1 of 39 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY TRENTON DIVISION

CASE 0:17-cv JNE-FLN Document 1 Filed 07/18/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA.

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 05/22/15 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 2:14-cv NVW Document 1 Filed 10/17/14 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR AUTAUGA COUNTY, ALABAMA

Answer A to Question 10. To prevail under negligence, the plaintiff must show duty, breach, causation, and

CASE 0:17-cv JNE-FLN Document 1 Filed 06/20/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Sheffield Edwards, III

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:13-cv KOB Document 1 Filed 02/05/13 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

California Bar Examination

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********

Case 3:13-cv GPM-PMF Document 5 Filed 02/14/13 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

CASE 0:17-cv JNE-FLN Document 1 Filed 05/25/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Joseph Owings

Plaintiff, Deborah Fellner, by and through her counsel, Eichen Levinson & Crutchlow, LLP, hereby makes this claim against the Defendant as follows:

Filing # E-Filed 12/22/ :53:20 PM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. v. Case No.:

DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS WESTERN DIVISION

Transcription:

Case 4:18-cv-00050-RGE-SBJ Document 1 Filed 02/20/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA DEREK PORTER and SARAH PORTER, Husband and Wife, and, RESIDENTS OF SOUTH DAKOTA, vs. Plaintiffs, FAREWAY STORES, INC., an Iowa corporation, Case No. 4:18-cv-50 COMPLAINT Defendant. COME NOW the Plaintiffs, Derek and Sarah Porter, by and through their attorneys of record, Wandro and Associates, P.C., and Marler Clark, L.L.P., P.S., complaining of the Defendant, Fareway Stores, Inc., and allege and state as follows: PARTIES 1. At all times relevant to this action, the Plaintiffs, Derek and Sarah Porter, reside in Harrisburg, South Dakota. Plaintiffs are citizens of the State of South Dakota. 2. At all times relevant to this action, Defendant, Fareway Stores Inc. was an Iowa corporation with its principal place of business located at 2300 8th Street, Boone, Iowa. Fareway Stores Inc. is a citizen of the State of Iowa. At all times relevant to this action, Fareway Stores Inc. was a manufacturer, distributor and seller of Chicken Salad to customers across Iowa, Minnesota, Illinois, Nebraska and South Dakota. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 3. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 28 USC 1332(a) because the matter in controversy exceeds $75,000, exclusive of costs; it is 1

Case 4:18-cv-00050-RGE-SBJ Document 1 Filed 02/20/18 Page 2 of 9 between citizens of different states; and because Fareway Stores Inc. has certain minimum contacts with the State of Iowa such that the maintenance of this suit in this district does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice. 4. Venue in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa is proper pursuant to 28 USC 1391(a)(1) and (2) because Fareway Stores Inc. was subject to personal jurisdiction in this judicial district at the time of the commencement of the action, and because a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the Plaintiffs claims and causes of action occurred in this judicial district. FACTS The Outbreak 5. According to the Iowa Department of Health, to date there are at least 28 confirmed and 66 probable cases of Salmonella linked to Fareway Stores Inc. Chicken Salad in Iowa. There are reports of illnesses in Nebraska, Minnesota and Nebraska. 6. Last week the U.S. Department of Agriculture s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) issued a public health alert out of an abundance of caution due to concerns about illnesses reported in the state of Iowa that may be caused by Salmonella associated with a chicken salad product. This product was sold at all Fareway grocery stores in Iowa, as well as Illinois, Minnesota, Nebraska and South Dakota. The Chicken Salad item for this public health alert was produced between Dec. 15, 2017, and Feb. 13, 2018. The following product is subject to the public health alert: Varying weights of Fareway Chicken Salad sold in plastic deli containers with a Fareway store deli label. This product was shipped to all Fareway grocery stores in Iowa, Illinois, Minnesota, Nebraska and South Dakota and sold directly to consumers who shopped at Fareway. 2

Case 4:18-cv-00050-RGE-SBJ Document 1 Filed 02/20/18 Page 3 of 9 7. The problem was discovered following reports of illness in Iowa. On Feb. 9, 2018, the Iowa Department of Public Health notified FSIS of an investigation of Salmonella related illnesses within the state of Iowa. FSIS continues to work with public health partners at the Iowa Department of Public Health and Department of Inspections and Appeals on this investigation. Updated information will be provided as it becomes available. Salmonella 8. Salmonella is the second most common intestinal infection in the United States. More than 7,000 cases of Salmonella were confirmed in 2009; however, the majority of cases go unreported. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that over 1 million people in the U.S. contract Salmonella each year, and that an average of 20,000 hospitalizations and almost 400 deaths occur from Salmonella poisoning, according to a 2011 report. 9. Salmonella infection usually occurs when a person eats food contaminated with the feces of animals or humans carrying the bacteria. Salmonella outbreaks are commonly associated with eggs, meat and poultry, but these bacteria can also contaminate other foods such as fruits and vegetables. Foods that are most likely to contain Salmonella include raw or undercooked eggs, raw milk, contaminated water, and raw or undercooked meats. 10. Symptoms of Salmonella infection, or Salmonellosis, range widely, and are sometimes absent altogether. The most common symptoms include diarrhea, abdominal cramps, and fever. 11. Typical Symptoms of Salmonella infection: Appear 6 to 72 hours after eating contaminated food and last for 3 to 7 days without treatment. Diarrhea Abdominal Cramps Fever of 100 F to 102 F Bloody diarrhea 3

Case 4:18-cv-00050-RGE-SBJ Document 1 Filed 02/20/18 Page 4 of 9 Vomiting Headache Body Aches 12. Complications of Salmonella poisoning are more likely to occur among young children and people age 65 or older. Possible complications include Reactive Arthritis is thought to occur in 2 to 15 percent of Salmonella patients. Symptoms include inflammation of the joints, eyes, or reproductive or urinary organs. On average, symptoms appear 18 days after infection. Irritable Bowel Syndrome can also be a long-term complication. 13. Salmonella infections generally last 3 to 7 days, and often do not require treatment. People with severe dehydration may need rehydration through an IV. Antibiotics are recommended for those at risk of invasive disease, including infants under three months old. Typhoid fever is treated with a 14-day course of antibiotics. Unfortunately, treatment of Salmonella has become more difficult as it has become more resistant to antibiotics. Finding the right antibiotic for a case of Salmonella is crucial to treating this bacterial infection. Derek and Sarah Porter Consumption of Fareway Chicken Salad and Salmonella Infection 14. Derek and Sarah Porter purchased Fareway Chicken Salad on February 8, 2018 from the Fareway store in Harrisburg, South Dakota. 15. On Sunday and Monday February 11 th and 12 th, both Derek and Sarah became ill with diarrhea and abdominal cramping. Both continued to suffer bouts of headache, stomach cramps and diarrhea until Dereck took Sarah to the Emergency Room at about 1:30 AM on Valentine s Day, February 14 th. 16. In the Emergency Room several tests were run on Sarah and she was given an IV for dehydration. Because her liver enzymes were elevated, Sarah was admitted to the hospital. 4

Case 4:18-cv-00050-RGE-SBJ Document 1 Filed 02/20/18 Page 5 of 9 She was prescribed pain medication due to the cramping. She remained hospitalized until February 16 th. 17. Both Derek and Sarah had stool tests performed and both tests came back positive for Salmonella. Both were contacted by the South Dakota Department of Health and were informed that they were the first two cases linked to the Fareway Chicken Salad Salmonella Outbreak in South Dakota. 18. Derek and Sarah continue to suffer stomach cramps and diarrhea. Both have lost wages and may continue to lose wages in the future. COUNT I (Strict Product Liability) 19. The Plaintiffs incorporate the preceding paragraphs of this Complaint, by this reference, as if each of these paragraphs were set forth here in its entirety. 20. The Defendant manufactured, distributed, and sold the adulterated Chicken Salad that injured the Plaintiffs. the public. 21. The Defendant manufactured a food product, including Chicken Salad, for sale to 22. Food that is contaminated by Salmonella is unsafe when put to the use reasonably foreseeable considering the nature of the product. Namely, Salmonella contaminated food is unfit for human consumption. 23. The Chicken Salad that Plaintiffs purchased, and consumed, was contaminated with Salmonella when it left the control of Defendant. Plaintiffs consumption of the contaminated food caused them to become infected by Salmonella and to suffer injuries as a direct and proximate result of that consumption. 5

Case 4:18-cv-00050-RGE-SBJ Document 1 Filed 02/20/18 Page 6 of 9 24. The Defendant is strictly liable to the Plaintiffs for the harm proximately caused by the manufacture and sale of an unsafe and defective food product. COUNT II (Negligence) 25. The Plaintiffs incorporate the preceding paragraphs of this Complaint, by this reference, as if each of these paragraphs were set forth here in its entirety. 26. The Defendant designed, manufactured, distributed, and sold Chicken Salad that was contaminated with Salmonella, a deadly pathogen. 27. The Defendant owed a duty to all persons who purchased and consumed its product, including the Plaintiffs, to manufacture and sell Chicken Salad that was safe to eat, that was not adulterated with deadly pathogens, like Salmonella, and that was not in violation of applicable food and safety regulations. The Defendant breached this duty. 28. The Defendant owed a duty to all persons who purchased and consumed its products, including Plaintiffs, to ensure that any representations regarding the certifications its products had undergone prior to distribution and sale were made with reasonable care. Defendant breached this duty. 29. The Defendant had a duty to comply with all statutes, laws, regulations, or safety codes pertaining to the manufacture, distribution, storage, and sale of its food products, but failed to do so, and was therefore negligent. The Plaintiffs were among the class of persons designed to be protected by these statutes, laws, regulations, safety codes or provision pertaining to the manufacture, distribution, storage, and sale of similar food products. 30. The Defendant breached the duties owed to the ultimate consumers of Chicken Salad by committing the following acts and omissions of negligence: 6

Case 4:18-cv-00050-RGE-SBJ Document 1 Filed 02/20/18 Page 7 of 9 a. Failed to adequately maintain or monitor the sanitary conditions of its products, premises, equipment and employees, and the products, premises, equipment and employees of other entities in the supply chain of the subject Chicken Salad; b. Failed to properly operate its facilities and equipment in a safe, clean, and sanitary manner; c. Failed to apply its food safety policies and procedures to ensure the safety and sanitary conditions of its food products, premises, and employees; d. Failed to apply food safety policies and procedures that met industry standards for the safe and sanitary production of food products, and the safety and sanitary condition of its premises and employees; e. Failed to prevent the transmission of Salmonella to consumers of its Chicken Salad; f. Failed to properly train its employees and agents how to prevent the transmission of Salmonella on its premises, from its facility or equipment, or in its food products; g. Failed to properly supervise its employees and agents to prevent the transmission of Salmonella on its premises, from its facility or equipment, or in its food products; and h. Failed to test its Chicken Salad for microbial pathogens, like Salmonella. 27. The Defendant had a duty to comply with all statutory and regulatory provisions that pertained or applied to the manufacture, distribution, storage, labeling, and sale of its food products. The Defendant breached this duty. 28. The Defendant owed a duty to the Plaintiffs to use reasonable care in the manufacture, distribution, and sale of its food products, to prevent contamination with Salmonella. The Defendant breached this duty. 29. The Plaintiffs injuries proximately and directly resulted from the negligence of the Defendant, and from the Defendant s violations of statutes, laws, regulations, and safety codes pertaining to the manufacture, distribution, storage, and sale of food. 7

Case 4:18-cv-00050-RGE-SBJ Document 1 Filed 02/20/18 Page 8 of 9 COUNT III (Breach of Warranty) 30. The Plaintiffs incorporate the preceding paragraphs of this Complaint, by this reference, as if each of these paragraphs were set forth here in its entirety. 31. By offering Chicken Salad f or sale to the public, Defendant impliedly warranted that such Chicken Salad was safe to eat, that it was not adulterated with a deadly pathogen, and that the Chicken Salad had been safely prepared under sanitary conditions. 32. The Defendant breached the implied warranties about the food they manufactured and sold to Plaintiffs, which was consumed by Plaintiffs causing Plaintiffs injuries and losses. 33. The Plaintiffs injuries proximately and directly resulted from Defendant s breach of implied warranties, and the Plaintiffs are thus entitled to recover for all actual, consequential, and incidental damages that flow directly and in a foreseeable fashion from these breaches. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, the Plaintiffs pray as follows: (1) That the Court award the Plaintiffs judgment against Defendant for damages. (2) That the Court award all such other sums as shall be determined to fully and fairly compensate the Plaintiffs for all general, special, incidental and consequential damages incurred, or to be incurred, by the Plaintiffs as the direct and proximate result of the acts and omissions of the Defendant; (3) That the Court award the Plaintiffs their costs, disbursements and reasonable attorneys fees incurred; 8

Case 4:18-cv-00050-RGE-SBJ Document 1 Filed 02/20/18 Page 9 of 9 (4) That the Court award the Plaintiffs the opportunity to amend or modify the provisions of this Complaint as necessary or appropriate after additional or further discovery is completed in this matter, and after all appropriate parties have been served; and (5) That the Court award such other and further relief as it deems necessary and proper in the circumstances. JURY TRIAL DEMAND Plaintiffs demand trial by jury on all issues raised herein. Dated this 20th day of February, 2018. Respectfully submitted, \s\ Steven Wandro Steven Wandro AT0008177 WANDRO AND ASSOCIATES, P.C. 2501 Grand Avenue B Des Moines, Iowa 50312 Telephone: 515/281-1475 Facsimile: 515/281-1474 swandro@2501grand.com AND \s\ William D. Marler William D. Marler, WSBA #17233 Pro hac Vice Pending MARLER CLARK, LLP PS 1012 1st Avenue, 5th Floor Seattle, Washington 98104 Telephone: 206/346-1888 Facsimile: 206/346-1898 bmarler@marlerclark.com 9