NANCY A. NOALL. Contact Information Nancy A. Noall

Similar documents
Colleen P. Lewis Partner

James J. Oh. Focus Areas. Overview

Charles M. Roesch Partner

Morrow v. Kroger: Obtained summary judgment on all claims of employer liability for sexual harassment and retaliation, affirmed by the Fifth Circuit C

ZASHIN&RICH CO.,L.P.A.

William E. Robinson Partner

Federal Labor Laws. Paul K. Rainsberger, Director University of Missouri Labor Education Program Revised, February 2004

WILLIAM E. CORUM. Kansas City, MO office:

Scott S. Morrisson Partner

which we were successful in obtaining a preliminary injunction against borrowers. Additionally, SAC later received summary judgment over all of Plaint

Edward F. Berbarie. Focus Areas. Overview

7 Saint Paul Street Baltimore, MD Phone: Fax:

DAVID FERGUSON Partner

While earning her law degree, Sabrina served as president of the student bar association at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles.

Michael J. Lehet. Practice Areas. Overview

R. Kenyon Meyer Partner

Key Legislation in the Area of Employment and Labor Law: The Employee Free Choice Act

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Case: 1:17-md DAP Doc #: 19 Filed: 12/21/17 1 of 5. PageID #: 148 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

EEOC v. Pacific Airport Services, Inc.,

Shawn Oller. Focus Areas. Overview

Employment. Compliance with Federal and State Employment Law. Employee/Employer Relations. Employment Litigation and Dispute Resolution

Labor, Employment, and HR Law Update ( ) Aaron L. Zandy, SPHR, Esquire FordHarrison LLP (407)

Working Through an Action-Packed Year: Top Ten Labor Law Developments for Employers to Watch and Manage in 2011

Jesse Maddox. Partner Sacramento, Fresno. Tel:

Jody Feder Legislative Attorney American Law Division

To Be or Not to Be In Severance Agreements

EEOC v. NEA-Alaska, Inc.

TUETH KEENEY COOPER MOHAN & JACKSTADT

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Mint Julep Restaurant Operations, LLC d/b/a Cheddar's Casual Cafe, Defendant.

MELISSA M. MERLIN. St. Louis, MO office:

Court of Appeals of Ohio

GRIEVANCE AND ARBITRATION PROCEDURES FOR ANY DISPUTES RELATING TO EMPLOYEES AND JOB APPLICANTS OF BILL S ELECTRIC COMPANY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION. Defendants. ) ORDER

RESOLVING THE DISPUTE: THE NINTH CIRCUIT BRINGS SIDE AGREEMENTS INTO SCOPE IN THE CONFLICTS OVER ARBITRATION IN INLANDBOATMENS UNION V.

1. Does each United Steelworkers local union have a Civil Rights Committee?

Federal Labor Laws. Paul K. Rainsberger, Director University of Missouri Labor Education Program Revised, July 2008

Dana L. Eismeier Shareholder Litigation

Hold All Arbitrations: Public Policy Invalidations Are on the Loose - Town of Groton v. United Steelworkers of America

C. Robert Heath S. MoPac Expressway, Building One, Suite 300 Austin, Texas 78746

EEOC v. Mason County Forest Products, LLC

by DAVID P. TWOMEY* 2(a) (2006)). 2 Pub. L. No , 704, 78 Stat. 257 (1964) (current version at 42 U.S.C. 2000e- 3(a) (2006)).

EEOC v. Stephens Institute d/b/a The Academy of Art College

Sarah Bryan Fask. Focus Areas. Overview

EEOC and Darmo et al. v. Pinnacle Nissan, Inc. et al.

Atlanta. Asheville. Austin. Birmingham. Boston. Chicago. Columbia. Fairfax. Greenville. Jacksonville. Kansas City. Lakeland. Los Angeles County.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, et al., v. White House Home for Adults

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Maharaja Hospitality Inc, d/b/a Quality Inn by Choice Hotels

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CLASS ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION. v. Case No. 5:13cv369-MW/GRJ

FOR CODERS 102. Other Notes (if you have a note for ABF staff, write it below or on the back of this page) Very weak/flimsy case

EEOC v. Applegate Holdings LLC

Form FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Form Judge:

Recent Developments in Unionization/Collective Bargaining. Presented By:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, CV-W-2-ECF

JURY WAIVERS AND ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS

Employment Law - A Union's Duty of Fair Representation in Pilot Seniority Negotiations

EEOC, Christopher, Bhend, and Chamara v. National Education Association, National Education Association - Alaska

December 18, Via Electronic and U.S. Mail

Robert T. Smith. Partner Washington, DC p Practices. Recognition. Education.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

How to Use Torts Tactically in Employment Litigation

I. Case Style. II. Type of Case.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLIll~ STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DIVISION CONSENT DECREE THE LITIGATION

ATLANTA BAR ASSOCIATION LAWYER REFERRAL AND INFORMATION SERVICE OPERATING RULES

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

MUTUAL AGREEMENT TO ARBITRATE CLAIMS Revised 4/5/2007

Case 3:15-cv EDL Document 1 Filed 12/09/15 Page 1 of 16

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Arbitration Agreements v. Wage and Hour Class Actions

The legality of affirmative action plans and consent decrees in the light of recent court decisions

Releases and the Law of Retaliation: Theories and Recent Developments

Where Should I File My Lawsuit in California? bc-llp.com 1

A Live 90-Minute Audio Conference with Interactive Q&A

EEOC & Wolansky v. United Healthcare of Florida, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

United States of America v. The City of Belen, New Mexico

U.S. Sentencing Commission 2014 Drug Guidelines Amendment Retroactivity Data Report

Arbitration Agreements A Discussion on the Advantages and Tips on Contractual Construction by Lani Dorsey

COMPULSORY EMPLOYMENT ARBITRATION: PROS AND CONS FOR EMPLOYERS

United States Court of Appeals

Second Quarter Report by Agency. Prepared by the Office of the General Counsel

Case 2:09-cv NGE-VMM Document 26 Filed 02/08/2010 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

EEOC v. River View Coal, LLC

SMS QUARTERLY AN INSIDE LOOK AT YOUR LAW FIRM AND WHAT ITS LAWYERS ARE DOING TO SERVE YOU

Federal Labor Laws. Paul K. Rainsberger, Director University of Missouri Labor Education Program Revised, February 2004

Case 1:16-cv WTL-DLP Document 44 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 615

The Sixth Circuit s Deleon Holding: How Granting a Requested Transfer May Be an Adverse Employment Action

Case 2:17-cv AJS Document 50 Filed 06/13/17 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 06/13/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Oregon enacts statute to make improper patent license demands a violation of its unlawful trade practices law

Family Medical Leave Act Decisions

Case 3:17-cv MPS Document 28 Filed 02/08/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Retaliation Developments

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

George D. Sax

LAMAR F. JOST Partner P F

William F. Allen. Focus Areas. Overview

EEOC v. U-Haul International Inc.

Recruitment and Selection

Transcription:

NANCY A. NOALL NANCY A. NOALL is a Partner with the Ohio based law firm of Weston Hurd LLP and is the Chair of the firm s Labor Practice Group. She concentrates her practice in the areas of labor and employment law and has successfully defended clients in such industries as computer software, contract research and development, communications and manufacturing. She has represented clients in the defense of sexual harassment and other employment related claims. Nancy has litigated cases ranging from employment discrimination to wrongful discharge in the states of Arkansas, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, New Jersey, Ohio and Texas. She has arbitrated grievances under union contracts in Arkansas, Kentucky, Indiana, New Jersey and Ohio. Having worked her way through college and law school as a manager of a restaurant franchise in Northeastern Ohio, Nancy is particularly sensitive to the operational needs of her clients and regularly provides counseling in personnel and operating policies designed to fit each client s unique business needs. She provides counsel through each phase of the employment relationship, including preemployment testing, hiring, performance evaluations, discipline and discharge, all designed to minimize the potential for employment related litigation. She routinely provides advice to non union clients on how to remain union free while, at the same time, helping unionized clients develop positive relationships with their union. Nancy received her B.A. magna cum laude in 1977 from John Carroll University and her J.D. in 1981 from Case Western Reserve University where she was a member of the Order of the Coif. In addition to her Ohio Bar admission, Nancy has admission before the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth and Sixth Circuits, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, and the United States Supreme Court. She is an AV rated attorney by Martindale Hubbell. Nancy is a member of the Employment and Labor Law Sections of the Cleveland Metropolitan and Ohio State Bar associations. Contact Information Nancy A. Noall 216.687.3368 nnoall@westonhurd.com

REPRESENTATIVE MATTERS Workers Compensation Experience For most of her professional career, Nancy has done some workers compensation law, but since 2008, she has represented clients at the Industrial Commission on average of one to two times per week. Defended employers in over 300 workers compensation cases, either before the Ohio Industrial Commission or in State Court. Advising employers on the compensability of claims and contesting workers compensation cases. Represented employers in.512 appeals to Common Pleas Court in both state fund and selfinsured cases, and both defending claimants appeals and prosecuting employer appeals. Represented employers in workers compensation retaliation claims. Employment and Labor Litigation Defending state common law wrongful discharge and defamation lawsuits; Defending both state and federal lawsuits alleging violations of fair employment practices statutes, including sexual discrimination, racial discrimination, disability discrimination, sexual harassment, sexual orientation discrimination, and national origin discrimination; Representing employers before the EEOC and state fair employment practices agencies when charges of discrimination have been filed; Defending employers against unfair labor practice charges filed by unions with the NLRB, including defending during the investigatory phase and in unfair labor practice complaint proceedings; Representing employers before the National Labor Relations Board with respect to various union election issues, including the appropriate scope of bargaining units and election objections; Defending employers in Department of Labor investigations of alleged wage and hour violations, as well as FMLA complaints; Defended employers in over 200 workers compensation cases, either before the Ohio Industrial Commission or in State Court; Arbitrating over 120 grievances arising under collective bargaining agreements ranging from relatively uncomplicated disciplinary issues to complex contract interpretation issues, such as COLA clauses and piecework rates for incentive jobs; Obtaining injunctive relief against mass picketing, violence, or illegal strikes; Representing employers who have been the targets of illegal or unfair labor practices by unions including unlawful secondary boycotts.

Employment and Labor Counseling Advising non union clients with respect to union avoidance tactics, including assisting clients in implementing alternative dispute resolution procedures, such as internal peer review programs and training company personnel in ADR procedures; Assisting employers in union organizing campaigns and in developing and implementing effective campaign strategies; Advising employers involved in collective bargaining negotiations, including developing bargaining strategies and providing advice so as to avoid unfair labor practice charges; Providing guidance to employers faced with difficult negotiations who may need advice on weathering a strike; Counseling employers, when necessary, on replacement of striking workers; Advising clients with respect to contract interpretations issues arising under collective bargaining agreements; Drafting or revising employee manuals or specific employment policies including FMLA policies, drug testing policies, no solicitation and no distribution policies and ADR policies; Advising employers concerning the hiring and firing of employees, including reductions in the workforce; Providing employers with advice concerning mass layoffs and plant closings under both state and federal law, including The WARN Act; Counseling employers through all phases of the employment relationship including hiring, discipline, evaluations, last chance agreements, discharges and separation agreements; Advising employers on compliance with new or changing employment laws including providing supervisory training; Counseling employers on investigating claims of discrimination or harassment including sexual harassment; Assisting employers in complying with wage and hour laws and COBRA; Counseling employers and executives in analyzing, drafting and negotiating individual employment contracts, including retention bonus agreements, non compete and confidentiality agreements, incentives plans and severance agreements. Labor and Employment Law Experience Includes the Following: Advised a major rubber manufacturer during negotiations with the United Steelworkers International Union and one of its Locals that eventually led to a three month long lockout of Union employees that began in November 2011. Then successfully defended the company before the National Labor Relations Board when the USW filed numerous unfair labor practice charges against the company claiming that the company violated the National

Labor Relations Act. The majority of the charges alleged that the company failed to bargain with the union in good faith in a number of different ways. In addition, the union claimed that, because the company allegedly failed to bargain with the union in good faith, the lockout of union employees was also an unfair labor practice. The Regional Director dismissed the majority of the charges, including those charging the lockout was unlawful. This dismissal was upheld on the union s appeal to the Acting General Counsel of the NLRB in Washington. Cooper Tire & Rubber Company and the USW, NLRB Charge No. 08 CA 070209. Obtained jury verdicts in favor of employers in wrongful discharge actions in a two day jury trial in an Ohio court and a three day jury trial in a Mississippi court. Klasson v. Park Corporation, Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court, Case No. 197298; Rorie v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Company, County Court of Lee County, Miss., Case No. 4,144. Obtained summary judgment in favor of the employer in a disability discrimination lawsuit. Durst v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Company, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio, Case No. 3:00 CV 7339 (2001). Assisted a major produce distributor in a decertification election in 2009, including defending unfair labor practice charges and litigating which employees were entitled to vote in the election, which resulted in the decertification of an incumbent union that had represented employees for nearly 60 years. Obtained summary judgment in favor of a plastic surgeon who was sued by a former nurse who claimed that she was constructively discharged after she filed a breast implant lawsuit against Dow Corning and that she was subject to a sexually hostile work environment. The summary judgment decision was upheld on appeal. Takach v. American Medical Technology, (Cuyahoga County App. 1998), 1998 Ohio App. LEXIS 638. Won summary judgment in favor of a national freight company in a sexual harassment lawsuit brought in federal district court. Garcia v. ANR Freight Systems, 942 F.Supp. 351 (N.D. Ohio 1996). Gained summary judgment in favor of the employer in a sex discrimination claim brought by a former female security officer under Ohio s fair employment practices law. Rita Photinos v. I X Center Corporation, Park Corporation and Frank Petrella, Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Case No. 332406. Secured summary judgment for two employers in Ohio state courts. This includes a major security service firm and one for a heat treat company on combined wrongful discharge/defamation actions brought by discharged employees. Duhn v. Industrial Security Service, Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Case No. 88 160529 CV; Ceol v. Zion Industries, Lorain County Common Pleas Court, Case No. 90 CV 104913, Court of Appeals, Case No. 91CA 005110. In the Ceol case, also obtained an award of attorneys' fees from the plaintiff s attorney for having filed a frivolous lawsuit.

Obtained summary judgment for TRW, Inc. in an ERISA action filed by United Auto Workers seeking payment of supplemental unemployment benefits to employees of former TRW division. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW), et al. v. Argo Tech Corporation, et al., U.S. District Court, N.D. Ohio, Case No. 1:89 CV 1925. Obtained summary judgment in favor of a national convenience store chain in a Title VII action brought by a discharged employee who claimed she was a victim of racial discrimination. Howard v. Dairy Mart Convenience Stores, U.S. District Court, N.D. Ohio, Case No. 1:91 CV 2239. Successfully defended a Storer Cable System in New Jersey against unfair labor practice charges filed by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers over the discharge of an employee who had engaged in union organizing activities. CATV, 279 NLRB 1081. Successfully defended unfair labor practice charges filed by the International Alliance of Theatrical and Stage Employees against a Cleveland television station which had bargained to impasse over changes in employees' work assignments. The union appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals was unsuccessful. IATSE L. 666 v. NLRB, 904 F.2d 47 (D.C. Cir. 1990). Persuaded a Regional Director for the NLRB to dismiss charges that the Distribution Center for a major rubber manufacturer had discriminatorily discharged a leading Union activist at the conclusion of the IBEW's second Union campaign. Obtained dismissal of unfair labor practice charges filed by two former employees of a contract research laboratory who were discharged by their employer after they had filed lawsuits for alleged physical injuries resulting from exposure to workplace chemicals. Persuaded an NLRB Regional Director to dismiss charges brought against a major rubber company alleging that the company was a successor to the unionized company that had previously owned the facility and assets of the newly opened plant in Guntersville, Alabama. In addition, the Regional Director dismissed charges claiming a discriminatory refusal to hire brought by several union employees of the former owner who were not hired by the new company. Hercules Rubber Company, NLRB Case Nos. 10 CA 29175 and 10 CA 29188. Assisted in four successful union election campaigns for Cooper Tire & Rubber Company, two in Tupelo, Mississippi and two in Albany, Georgia. Assisted a number of smaller employers throughout Ohio in overcoming union organizational campaigns and in defending election objections and unfair labor practice charges brought by the defeated union in connection with their failed organizing attempts. Advised a company who bargained to impasse for a first contract then implemented its final offer thereafter. Persuaded a Regional Director for the NLRB to dismiss unfair labor practice charges brought by the Union alleging numerous underlying claims of bad faith bargaining. Hercules Tire & Rubber Company, Case No. 8 CA 32348 1.

Persuaded the U.S. Court of Appeals to overturn a trial judge decision in favor of an age discrimination plaintiff. The Sixth Circuit found the lower court's decision to be "clearly erroneous" and held that the plaintiff was legitimately discharged when his job was eliminated as a result of a corporate reorganization. Brownlow v. Edgecomb Metals Company, 867 F.2d 960 (6th Cir. 1989). Litigated a petition for review of a withdrawal liability assessment issued by the Central States Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund against a large Ohio dairy during the course of a strike against the dairy by the Teamsters Union and convinced the Central States Pension Fund that the "labor dispute" exemption to an assessment of withdrawal liability applied. Persuaded a federal district court to order the plaintiff in a wrongful discharge case to submit his dispute to the company's internal grievance procedure. The court later enforced the grievance panel award upholding the discharge and dismissed the lawsuit. Betts v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Company, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21190 (N.D. Miss. 1994) Obtained a dismissal of an ERISA lawsuit against a health care insurance company requiring the participant to pursue the grievance and arbitration procedure set forth in the insurance policy. University Hospital of Cleveland v. Phelps, et seq., U.S. District Court, N.D. Ohio, Case No. 1:94CV2340. Obtained summary judgment in favor of a moving and storage company in a lawsuit brought by a former employee who claimed that she had been discharged in retaliation for filing a workers compensation claim. Roth v. Andrews Moving & Storage, Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Case No. 255653. Won summary judgment for a large convenience store chain in a lawsuit brought by a former employee who claimed he was discharged for failing a polygraph test in violation of the Employee Polygraph Protection Act. Gentile v. Dairy Mart Convenience Stores, Inc., U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit, Case No. 94 3662. Successfully defended employers in 120 labor arbitrations over the past 25 years in Arkansas, Connecticut, Indiana, Mississippi, New Jersey and Ohio. Successfully defended a subsidiary of Dairy Mart before the NLRB against unfair labor practice charges filed by the Teamsters. The NLRB held that Dairy Mart was entitled to withdraw the final offer made to the Teamsters before the strike and to submit "regressive" proposals to the Union once Dairy Mart had successfully weathered the strike. The Lawson Company, NLRB Case Nos. 8 CA 19115 and 8 CA 19116.