IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

Similar documents
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. Appellant, Lorien Bourne, then a student at Bowling Greene State University,

Case 1:08-cv Document 1 Filed 10/07/2008 Page 1 of 8

12PREM;^O ^, Q^0 APR CLERK OFCOURT IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed March 19, Case No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed September 03, Case No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

F L= JUL CLERK OF COURT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. Case No.:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

IN THE OHIO ELECTIONS COMMISSION

HAMILTON MUNICIPAL COURT 345 HIGH STREET, HAMILTON, OHIO Hamiltonmunicipalcourt.org EVICTION PROCEDURE CLERK OF COURTS

IMM FED 13 Z013 CLERK OF COURT SUPR^ME COURT F 0H1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. FRANCESCA STEINHART, et al., CASE NO

ORIRfNAL CLERK OF C URT SUPREME COURT 0F OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. Case No.

The Ohio Court of Appeals Fifth District

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH, TEXAS

FROM STALIN TO BIN LADEN: COMPARING YESTERYEAR S ANTI-COMMUNIST STATUTES WITH THE PUBLIC EMPLOYER PROVISION OF THE OHIO PATRIOT ACT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 2013 RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS RELATOR'S ACTION IN MANDAMUS

***Please see Nunc Pro Tunc Entry at 2003-Ohio-826.*** IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PICKAWAY COUNTY APPEARANCES

In The United States District Court For The Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division. Answer

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

CLERK OF COURT SURREME COURTOFOHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. [State ex. rel.] Jenkins Smith, Case No Original Action in Mandamus

G E D SEP 1 4 ZU12 CLERK OF COURT. SEP CLERK r)f COIJRT SUPREME i;uur' u, JHIO SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. Court of Appeals Case Number C

AFTAB PUREVAL HAMILTON COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

NOTICE OF DEMAND FOR TRIAL OR DISPOSITION PURUSANT TO PENAL CODE SECTION 1381 OR

Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed March 18, Case No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

Case 2:13-cv MEF-TFM Document 10 Filed 11/12/13 Page 1 of 12

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UnofficialCopyOfficeofChrisDanielDistrictClerk

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO RESPONDENT ETNA TOWNSHIP'S ANSWER TO RELATORS' COMPLAINT FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. Relators, Respondent.

CAUSE NO. * STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT. vs. * JUDICIAL DISTRICT *DEFENDANT NAME GALVESTON COUNTY, TEXAS

* CASE NO: 633 * * * ORIGINAL ACTION IN MANDAMUS

FILLING VACANCIES IN ELECTIVE OFFICES

DIANA M. STEVENSON, CLERK OF COURTS BARBERTON MUNICIPAL COURT

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF AND PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. Introduction

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

The Supreme Court of Ohio

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Civil Division

STATE OF OHIO DAMAN PATTERSON

1 SB By Senator Hightower. 4 RFD: Judiciary. 5 First Read: 13-FEB-18. Page 0

STARK STATE COLLEGE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

OMA Government Affairs Committee September 28, 2011

Case: LTS Doc#:11-24 Filed:06/19/17 Entered:06/19/17 21:15:29 Exhibit Exhbit 17 Motion Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA PHOENIX DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed March 16, Case No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 2015

APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC DEFENDER

Case: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: 42 Filed: 12/23/13 Page: 1 of 19 PAGEID #: 781

AUG CLERK OF COURT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENTS University of Cincinnati and The Ohio State University

COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENTAL STRUCTURES AND FUNCTIONS 3 RD CHUUK STATE CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION STATE OF CHUUK, FSM

STATE OF OHIO, COLUMBIANA COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT

REPUBLICAN PARTY OF DANE COUNTY. Constitution and Bylaws

Court of Appeals of Ohio

APPLICATION FOR VACANCY IN THE OFFICE OF COUNCIL-AT-LARGE. Per Article IV, Section 5, of the Charter of the City of Avon, Ohio:

CAMPAIGN FINANCE AND BALLOT MEASURE GUIDE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO RESPONDENT OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY'S MOTION TO DISMISS

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 1L CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO

Case: 1:14-cv SO Doc #: 50 Filed: 07/15/15 1 of 7. PageID #: 438 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

ATTORNEY APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT (LONG)

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. Now comes the Respondent, the Honorable James M. Burge, Judge of the Lorain

^ -. CLERK OF PO^^^T SUPREME COUR r OF O^^^ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF STATE ex rel. STEVEN LINNAI3ARY ) Case No.

1900 M Street, NW, Ste. 250, Washington, D.C

DIANA M. STEVENSON, CLERK OF COURTS BARBERTON MUNICIPAL COURT

Case3:13-cv NC Document1 Filed12/09/13 Page1 of 18

Case3:13-cv WHA Document25 Filed02/26/14 Page1 of 21

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO

Court of Appeals of Ohio

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

MEMORANDUM. FROM: Pat Wolfe, Director of Elections Michael Sciortino, President of Ohio Association of Elections Officials (OAEO)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/28/17 Page 1 of 7 SAN FRANCISCO

VIRGINIA LOBBYING DISCLOSURE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO

APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Gains v. Rossi (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 620.] (No Submitted August 25, 1999 Decided September 29, 1999.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO. Petitioner-Appellant, : CASE NO. CA : O P I N I O N - vs - 4/20/2009 :

NAILAH K. BYRD CUYAHOGA COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio Court of Common Pleas. BRIEF March 14, :28

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Doss v. State, Slip Opinion No Ohio-5678.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

oi1v7 Case No. 14-0^ And IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 2014 State Ex Rel. Javier Humberto, Relator, ORIGINAL ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION. Plaintiff, ) v. ) Case No. Defendants.

UNIFORM APPLICATION FOR POST-CONVICTION RELIEF

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT PETITION OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD FOR AN ADJUDICATION IN CIVIL CONTEMPT AND FOR OTHER CIVIL RELIEF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

Case 3:14-cv HTW-LRA Document 1 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT * * * * * * * * * * * * *

GIDEON S BROKEN PROMISE:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI. Div. CLASS ACTION PETITION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. v. CASE NO DR001269XXXNB

Cause No. EX PARTE IN THE COURT COURT DESIGNATION *** COUNTY, TEXAS PETITION FOR EXPUNCTION OF CRIMINAL RECORDS

Transcription:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO STATE OF OHIO, ex rel. MARC S. TRIPLETT, Supreme Court No. 332 South Main Street Bellefontaine, Ohio 43311, Relator, ORIGINAL ACTION IN PROHIBITION vs. JOHN L. ROSS, Judge, Bellefontaine Municipal Court 226 West Columbus Avenue Bellefontaine, Ohio 43311, and MARTY CARMEAN, Clerk Bellefontaine Municipal Court 226 West Columbus Avenue Bellefontaine, Ohio 43311 and BELLEFONTAINE MUNICIPAL COURT 226 West Columbus Avenue Bellefontaine, Ohio 43311 Respondents. COMPLAINT FOR A WRIT OF PROHIBITION JEFFREY M. GAMSO (0043869) Legal Director, ACLU of Ohio Foundation, Inc. Max Wohl Civil Liberties Center 4506 Chester Avenue Cleveland, Ohio 44103-3621 Phone: (216) 472-2220 Fax: (216) 472-2210 e-mail: jmgamso@acluohio.org COUNSEL FOR RELATOR, MARC S. TRIPLETT

COMPLAINT FOR A WRIT OF PROHIBITION Marc S. Triplett, relator, pursuant to Sup.Ct.Prac.R. X, asks this Court to issue a writ of prohibition preventing the Bellefontaine Municipal Court, Honorable John L. Ross, Judge of that court, and Marty Carmean, Clerk of that court from demanding that attorneys who wish to accept court appointments sign a DECLARATION REGARDING MATERIAL ASSISTANCE/NONASSISTANCE TO A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION certifying that they have no involvement with organizations named on the Terrorist Exclusion List. In support of that request, Relator states as follows: 1. Relator Marc S. Triplett is an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Ohio and with Supreme Court Number 0021222 and who has accepted and hopes to continue to accept court appointments to represent the indigent accused in Bellefontaine Municipal Court and other courts. 2. Respondent John L. Ross is the Judge of the Bellefontaine Municipal Court. 3. Respondent Marty Carmean is the Clerk of the Bellefontaine Municipal Court. 4. Respondent Bellefontaine Municipal Court is the Municipal Court of Logan County, Ohio and is established pursuant to R.C. 1901.01(A) and with jurisdiction established purusant to R.C. 1901.02(B). 5. On April 10, 2006, a memorandum issued from Respondent Carmean 1

on letterhead of Respondent Bellefontaine Municipal Court directed to All Court Appointed Counsel and demanding that they complete and return, pursuant to Ohio Senate Bill 9, the GOVERNMENT BUSINESS AND FUNDING CONTRACTS form DECLARATION REGARDING MATERIAL ASSISTANCE/NONASSISTANCE TO A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION [capitalization and underscoring sic] perpared by the Division of Homeland Security of the Ohio Department of Public Safety (the Form ). 6. The Form itself references R.C. 2909.33 and 2909.32. Those sections of the Revised Code were enacted as part of Am.Sub.S.B. 9 (commonly known as the Ohio Patriot Act ) which was signed by the Governor on January 11, 2006 and has an effective date of April 14, 2006. 7. The Form requires that a person filling it out answer six questions with yes or no answers and provide identifying information. The questions, mandated by R.C. 2909.32 and 2909.33, are: (1) Are you a member of an organization on the U.S. Department of State Terrorist Exclusion List? (2) Have you used any position of prominence you have within any country to persuade others to support an organization on the U.S. Department of State Terrorist Exclusion List? (3) Have you knowingly solicited funds or other things of value for an organization on the U.S. Department of State Terrorist Exclusion List? (4) Have you solicited any individual for membership in an organization on the U.S. 2

Department of State Terrorist Exclusion List? (5) Have you committed an act that you know, or reasonably should have known, affords "material support or resources" to an organization on the U.S. Department of State Terrorist Exclusion List? (6) Have you hired or compensated a person you knew to be a member of an organization on the U.S. Department of State Terrorist Exclusion List or a person you knew to be engaged in planning, assisting, or carrying out an act of terrorism? 8. Failure to answer the questions honestly is, according to the Form and as set forth in R.C. 2909.33(A)(3)(c), a felony of the fifth degree. It is also a disqualification for any government contract, including, specifically in this case, a disqualification for receiving court appointments to represent indigent persons charged with crimes and subject to the jurisdiction of the Bellefontaine Municipal Court. 9. Pursuant to Section 2(B)(1)(g), Article IV, Ohio Constitution, original and exclusive power to regulate lawyers and the practice of law in Ohio rests in this Court. Any attempt by the General Assembly to interfere with that power is a violation of the doctrine of separation of powers and an unconstitutional usurpation of judicial authority by the legislature. Similarly, an attempt by the lower courts to limit the authority of a licensed attorney to practice before them is a usurpation of this Court s power. 10. Revised Code Sections 2909.32 and 2909.33, insofar as they mandate that attorneys wishing to accept court appointments to 3

represent the indigent accused (or other persons) must complete and return the Form are unconstitutional as usurpation of this Court s exclusive power to regulate and control lawyers and the practice of law. 11. Respondent s demand that persons who wish to accept appointments to represent the indigent accused (or other persons) complete and return the Form is unconstitutional as a usurpation of this Court s exclusive power to regulate and control lawyers and the practice of law. 12. Relator Triplett will not complete and return the Form to Respondents or any of them. WHEREFORE: A. Relator prays for a peremptory writ to issue ordering Respondents and each of them to cease efforts to have attorneys who seek court appointments from Bellefontaine Municipal Court to represent the indigent accused in that court complete and return the Form. B. Further, Relator prays for a peremptory writ to issue ordering Respondents and each of them to cease declaring that failure of an otherwise licensed, willing, and eligible attorney to complete and return the Form will be a disqualification from obtaining court appointments in the Bellefontaine Municipal Court. C. Further, Relator prays for a peremptory writ to issue ordering Respondents and each of them not to remove his name from the list of 4

those who are eligible to receive and do receive court appointments in Bellefontaine Municipal Court. D. In the alternative, Relator prays for an alternative writ directing Respondents to show cause why they should be permitted to demand completion and return of the Form as a condition of receiving court appointments in Bellefontaine Municipal Court. E. Should this Court grant the alternative writ, Relator requests that this Court permit oral argument. F. Relator prays for recovery of his costs and of reasonable attorney fees. Respectfully submitted, JEFFREY M. GAMSO (0043869) Legal Director, ACLU of Ohio Foundation, Inc. Max Wohl Civil Liberties Center 4506 Chester Avenue Cleveland, Ohio 44103-3621 Phone: (216) 472-2220 Fax: (216) 472-2210 e-mail: jmgamso@acluohio.org 5