IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)

Similar documents
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION ( SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION ( SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION )

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION ( SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION ) AND -VERSUS AND. Bhaban (3 rd Floor), 56, Agrabad C/A,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION ( SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)

WRIT PETITION NO. 911 OF 2016.

Supreme Court of Bangladesh, Hall No. 2,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD DISTRICT: AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO OF 2008 AND AND AND AND AND. In the matter between;

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION (Special Original Jurisdiction)

2 4. RahulRaj Mall Notice to be served upon its Authorized Representative Notice to be served its Authorized Representative Dumas Road, Magdalla, Sura

RESPONDENTS. Article 14 read with Article 19 (1) G. Article 246 read with entry 77 list 1, 7 th schedule.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH APPELLATE DIVISION (CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CIVIL PETITION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL NO OF 2010.

Bar & Bench (

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WP( C ) NO (IN THE MATTER OF PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH APPELLATE DIVISION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL WRIT JURISDICTION I.A NO OF 2012 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2012 ASSAM SANMILITA MAHASANGHA & ORS

HOQUE AND ASSOCIATES A Law Firm Address: BEL TOWER, Level-7, House No. 19, Road No. 1, Dhanmondhi R/A, Dhaka-1205

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION I.A. OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 63 OF Sandeep Parekh and ors.

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 1. The petitioner is filing the present Writ Petition under Article 32 of the

Government of Jammu and Kashmir General Administration Department (Services) Civil Secretariat, Srinagar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI (CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) Writ Petition (Civil) No. 866 of COMMON CAUSE Vs UNION OF INDIA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO: OF In the matter:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO 960 OF 2018 (UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) VERSES

Bar & Bench (

Bar & Bench (

HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA, APPELLATE SIDE

THE COMMERCIAL COURTS, COMMERCIAL DIVISION AND COMMERCIAL APPELLATE DIVISION OF HIGH COURTS (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2018

1. That the Petitioner is filing the present writ petition as a Public. Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 4 TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE K.N.

PESSI (SERVICE) REGULATIONS, 1973

The Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 [As amended by the Protection of Human Rights (Amendment) Act, 2006 No. 43 of 2006]

Bar & Bench ( SYNOPSIS

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND:: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) No of 2012

COURT STAMP IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)

The Protection of Human Rights Act, No 10 of 1994

QUIETING TITLES, 1959 CHAPTER 393

THE PUNJAB RIGHT TO SERVICE ACT, 2011 ( PUNJAB ACT NO.24 OF 2011.) A ACT

Bar and Bench (

UKRAINE LAW ON THE RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE VERKHOVNA RADA OF UKRAINE

PUNJAB POLICE SERVICE RULES ORIGINAL TEXT

The last date for submission of the bids is at


IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS OF A. RAJAGOPALAN ETC...Appellant VERSUS

TITLE 8. ELECTIONS ARTICLE I GENERAL PROVISIONS

THE CHILD AND ADOLESCENT (PROHIBITION AND REGULATION) ACT, 1986 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

Report on providing a legal framework for establishing a statutory association for the advocates' clerks

Act 4 Judiciary Act 2008

An Act to establish the National Construction Council and to provide for matters connected with and incidental to the establishment of that Council

PART II Procedure and Practice CHAPTER VI. General Rules regarding Applications and Affidavits

HIGH COURT, CALCUTTA APPELLATE SIDE

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

7F. Resignation by a member. A member of the Board may, by writing under his hand, addressed to the Government Secretary in charge of Devaswom

Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan on Citizenship of the Republic of Uzbekistan

Special Appeal No. 390 of 2018

Follow this and additional works at:

NOTICE INVITING APPLICATIONS FOR EMPANELMENT OF ADVOCATES/LAW FIRMS

Dhaka Chamber of Commerce and Industry 65-66, Motijheel Commercial Area, Dhaka-1000

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF NAMIBIA CONSTITUTION

37 Retention and inspection of records 38 Powers of Registrar in relation to accounts

WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S). 71/2019

THE NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR CHILDREN BILL, DRAFT BILL. Chapter-I. Preliminary

THE KERALA STATE YOUTH COMMISSION BILL, 2013

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH: JABALPUR. For M.P. H.J.S. (District Judge-Entry Level) through Promotion from Civil Judges Senior Division Exam-2017

THE CONSTITUTION (AMENDMENT) BILL, Explanatory Note (These notes form no part of the Bill but are intended only to indicate its general purport)

GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA

(i) THE LOKPAL AND LOKAYUKTAS BILL, 2011 ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES PART I PRELIMINARY. 1. Short title, extent, application and commencement.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5953 OF 2014

1 (1) These Rules may be called the Salar Jung Museum Rules, Definition 2 In these rules, Act means the Salar Jung Museum Act, 1961 (26 of 1961)

CONSTITUTION AND BYLAWS. of the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes Of the Flathead Reservation, as amended

CERTIFICATE OF URGENCY

Draft of Public Interest Writ Petition Against Restrictions on Withdrawals from Bank Accounts

under the Right to Information Act about action taken if any on the complaint/representations made by him to the Governor of Goa against Advocate

THE AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR MANAGEMENT (COMPOSITION, RECRUITMENT& PROMOTION) RULES, 1980

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO OF Association for Democratic Reforms Versus

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

NAGALAND PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION APPLICATION FORM FOR COMMON EDUCATIONAL SERVICES EXAMINATION 2018

NOTIFICATION NO. PSC/EXAM/23/2017 DATED:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN. Writ Petition Nos /2017 (T-IT)

Date and Event. 22/12/2008 The Information and Technology Act, 2000 was. 22/12/2008 The Information and Technology Act, 2000 was

BY-LAWS OF SKAGIT LAND TRUST. Article I MEMBERSHIP. Article III ANNUAL MEETING

SAINT LUCIA EQUALITY OF OPPORTUNITY AND TREATMENT IN EMPLOYMENT AND OCCUPATION ACT CHAPTER 16.14

NOTIFICATION MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL POLICY AND PROMOTION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY APPELLATE BOARD

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

In the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi. I.A. No. of 2013 In Civil Suit Number 2439/2012. The Chancellor, Master And Scholars Of The University

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK G.

THE LOKPAL AND LOKAYUKTAS BILL, As Reported by the Select Committee

Constitution of the Rotary Club of WASHINGTON, PENNSYLVANIA, USA

THE KENYA CHEMICAL SOCIETY CONSTITUTION

c t QUIETING TITLES ACT

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras. (Special Original Jurisdiction) W.P. No of 2014

Haryana School Education Act, 1995

THE COMPANIES ACT 1985 COMPANY LIMITED BY GUARANTEE AND NOT HAVING A CAPITAL DIVIDED INTO SHARES

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. W.P.(C) No.3245/2002 and CM No.11982/06, 761/07. Date of Decision: 6th August, 2008.

FORMS. for the term beginning I9o.. Dated at N. Y., the day of I9o

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR

Bangladesh Securities and Exchange Commission ACT, 1993 (ACT No. XV of 1993)

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras

Transcription:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) WRIT PETITION NO. 2932 OF 2010 IN THE MATTER OF An application under Article 102(1), 102(2)(a)(i) and 102(2)(a)(ii) of the Constitution of Peoples Republic of Bangladesh AND IN THE MATTER OF 1. Shapan Chowkider, son of Md. Nurul Islam Chowkider, of

-::2::- Village: South Chakdh, Post: Chakdh Bazar, Police Station Naroia, District Shariatpur 2. Ain O Salish Kendra (ASK), represented by its Executive Director, of 7/17, Block B, Lalmatia, Police Station Mohammadpur, District Dhaka 3. Bangladesh Legal Aid and Services Trust (BLAST), represented by its Executive Director, of YMCA Building, 1/1 Pioneer Road, Police Station Ramna, District Dhaka 4. Action for Disability and Development (ADD), represented by its Country

-::3::- Director, of House No.56, Road No.11, Banani, Police Station Gulshan, District Dhaka............ Petitioners VERSUS 1. Bangladesh, Represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Establishment, Bangladesh Secretariat, Police Station- Ramna, District Dhaka 2. Bangladesh, Represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Bangladesh Secretariat, Police Station Ramna, District Dhaka

-::4::- 3. Bangladesh, Represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Social Welfare, Bangladesh Secretariat, Police Station Ramna, District Dhaka 4. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Planning, Bangladesh Secretariat, Police Station Ramna, District Dhaka. 5. Bangladesh Public Service Commission, Represented by its Chairman, Old Airport Building, P.S. Tejgaon, Dhaka 1215

-::5::- 6. The Chairman, Bangladesh Public Service Commission, Old Airport Building, P.S. Tejgaon, Dhaka 1215 7. The Secretary, Bangladesh Public Service Commission, Old Airport Building, P.S. Tejgaon, Dhaka 1215 8. The Controller of Examinations (Cadre), Bangladesh Public Service Commission, Old Airport Building, P.S. Tejgaon, Dhaka 1215 9. Director General, Directorate of Health, Mohakhali, P.S. Gulshan, Dhaka

-::6::- 10. National Disability Welfare Coordination Committee, Represented by its Chairman, Ministry of Social Welfare, Bangladesh Secretariat, P. S. Ramna, Dhaka 11. The Chairman, National Disability Welfare Coordination Committee, Ministry of Social Welfare, Bangladesh Secretariat, P. S. Ramna, Dhaka 12. The Secretary, National Disability Welfare Coordination Committee, Ministry of Social Welfare, Bangladesh

-::7::- Secretariat, P. S. Ramna, Dhaka............ Respondents AND IN THE MATTER OF Persistently depriving Bangladeshi citizens with disabilities from the opportunity of appearing in the Bangladesh Civil Services (BCS) Examinations and not allowing them to join any cadre as may be determined by the Bangladesh Public Service Commission AND IN THE MATTER OF Publishing a supplementary notice

-::8::- expressly specifying that there is no bar to persons with disabilities from applying for 30 th BCS Examination 2010, in addition to the Notification, bearing File No. 80.200.046.00.00.001.2010-360, dated 08.3.2010, published by the Respondent No.8 AND IN THE MATTER OF Applying discretionary powers and performing duties of the respondents for ensuring the accommodation of persons with disabilities in the appropriate cadre posts of Bangladesh civil

-::9::- service in compliance with Section 6(2) of the Disability Welfare Act, 2001 (Act XII of 2001) read with Schedule Cha of the said Act AND IN THE MATTER OF Declaring the application of Schedule III of Bangladesh Civil Service (Age, Qualification and Examination for Direct Recruitment) Rules, 1982, being No. S.R.O. 142- L/82/ED/Recruitment/1-15/80, dated 11.5.1982, in general and without considering the fundamental rights of the citizens

-::10::- with disabilities, to that extend to be, inconsistent with the Part III of the Constitution of the People s Republic of Bangladesh and as such void AND IN THE MATTER OF Enforcement of fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 26, 40 and 27 of the Constitution of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh. To, Mr. Justice Mohammed Fazlul Karim, Hon ble Chief Justice of Bangladesh and his companion justices of the said Hon ble Court The humble petition on behalf

-::11::- of the petitioner above named respectfully SHEWETH: 1. That the petitioner No.1 Shwapan Chowkidar is a visually impaired person. By profession he is an Advocate. He obtained degrees in LL B (Hons) and LL M from Dhaka University in the years 2008 and 2009 respectively. He was enrolled as an Advocate by appearing in the written and viva voce examinations before the Bangladesh Bar Council. He also attempted to apply for the 28 th BCS Examination but was refused an admit card on the purported ground of his visual impairment and by reference to the BCS Rules. He brought this matter to the concern of the Prime Minister vide his letter, dated 29.3.2009, and requested her to grant quotas in favour of persons with disability. Mr. Shapan continued his efforts by sending reminder letters, dated 04.10.2009, 11.10.2009 and 18.3.2010, to the Prime Minister but has received no response

-::12::- to date. Under the said notice issued by the respondent No.6, Mr. Shapan will not be able to attend the 30 th BCS Examination as no accommodation for persons with disability is provided under the said notice. Photocopies of LL B (Hons), LL M, Bar Council Enrolment certificates of the petitioner No.1 is annexed herewith and marked as ANNEXURE A 2. That the petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 are well-reputed human rights and legal aid organisations, Ain O Shalish Kendra (ASK) and Bangladesh Legal Aid and Services Trust (BLAST). Both the organisations are actively engaged in advocacy against violations of fundamental rights of the citizens. Since their inception the organisations are providing legal aid and support to the victims of fundamental rights violations through its staff and panel of lawyers, who regularly take up fundamental rights

-::13::- matters before the High Court Division. The petitioner organisations ASK and BLAST also undertake activities aimed at the promotion and protection of human rights at the national and international level. ASK and BLAST are well known for their investigation, monitoring and documentation of violations of rights of persons with disabilities. They are also known for their campaigning for law reform and public interest litigation to secure rights of persons with disabilities. 3. That the petitioner No.4, Action for Disability and Development (ADD), is an UK-based disability rights organisation, duly registered in Bangladesh under NGO Bureau. 4. That the respondent No. 1 is the Secretary of Establishment, who is responsible for framing rules for employment in Bangladesh Civil Service. The Respondent No.2 is the Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, who is responsible for ensuring the promulgation of

-::14::- laws in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution of the People s Republic of Bangladesh. The Respondent No.3 is the Secretary, Ministry of Social Welfare, who is responsible for the affairs related to the persons with disabilities. The Respondent No.4 is the Secretary, Ministry of Health, who is responsible for the conduct of his subordinates, specifically the Director General, Directorate of Health. Respondents Nos. 5, 6 and 7 are Bangladesh Public Service Commission, Chairman of the said Commission and Secretary of the said Commission respectively. Respondents Nos. 5, 6 and 7 are responsible for conducting Bangladesh Civil Service Examinations and appointing deserving candidates in appropriate posts of appropriate cadres. The Respondent No.8 is the Controller of Examinations (Cadre), Bangladesh Public Service Commission, who issued the notification for employment under 30 th BCS Examination, bearing file No. 80.200.046.00.00.001.2010-360, dated 08.3.2010. The Respondent No.9 is the Director General,

-::15::- Directorate of Health, who is responsible for ensuring the standard of health of candidates for Bangladesh Civil Service examinations as prescribed under the provisions of Schedule III of Bangladesh Civil Service (Age, Qualification and Examination for Direct Recruitment) Rules, 1982, being No. S.R.O. 142-L/82/ED/Recruitment/1-15/80. Respondent Nos. 10, 11 and 12 are National Disability Welfare Coordination Committee, the Chairman of the said committee and the Secretary of the said committee. Respondent Nos. 10, 11 and 12 are responsible for (i) taking necessary steps to create opportunities for persons with disabilities to be employed in specific working arena; (ii) creating equal employment opportunities for persons with disabilities in appropriate services in the public sector, statutory corporations and in local government authorities; (iii) adopting measures for relaxing the age limit for persons with disabilities in the services in the public public sector, statutory corporations and in local government

-::16::- authorities; (iv) adopting measures for reserving appropriate quotas for persons with disabilities in the services of public sector, statutory corporations and in local government authorities, according to Section 6(2) of the Disability Welfare Act, 2001 (Act XII of 2001) read with Schedule Cha of the said Act. 5. That the addresses of the petitioners and the respondents given in the cause title of this petition are correct and genuine for the purpose of service upon them of summons, notices, affidavits and other allied matters. 6. That an employment notice has been issued by the Respondent No.8, bearing File No. 80.200.046.00.00.001.2010-360, dated 08.3.2010, in the Dainik Janakantha on 10.3.2010, for an employment of 2572 officers in 15 general cadres, 12 professional and technical cadres of Bangladesh Civil Service and 56 lecturers in Teachers Training Colleges. A copy of the said notice, bearing File

-::17::- No. 80.200.046.00.00.001.2010-360, dated 08.3.2010, is annexed herewith and marked as ANNEXURE B 7. That general cadres for which the employment notice has been passed include administration, police, audit and accounts, ansar, customs and excise, cooperative, food, family planning, post, railway transportation and commercial, tax, trade, economic and information. Professional and technical cadres include agriculture, fisheries, food, health, information, roads and highways, railway engineering, public health engineering, public works, statistics, livestock and general education. 8. That in clause 21 of the said notification it has been stated that candidates for police and ansar cadres must have a physical competence of 5 4 height for male candidates and 5 height for female candidates. For the rest of the cadres a height

-::18::- of 5 for male candidates and 4 10 for female candidates has been specified. Furthermore candidates for police and ansar cadres must have a physical competence of 120 lb weight for male candidates and 100 lb weight for female candidates. For the rest of the cadres 99.11 lb for male candidates and 88.10 lb for female candidates would be the standard of physical competence. In addition to that candidates must have eyesight according to the rules. It has been stated that other information regarding physical competence would be informed at an appropriate time, by implicit reference to the standard of physical competence as set out in Schedule III of Bangladesh Civil Service (Age, Qualification and Examination for Direct Recruitment) Rules, 1982, being No. S.R.O. 142- L/82/ED/Recruitment/1-15/80. A photocopy of the S.R.O. 142- L/82/ED/Recruitment/1-15/80, dated 11.5.1982 is annexed

-::19::- herewith and marked as ANNEXURE C 9. That in the Schedule III of the said Rules contains a detailed description about the physical competence of a candidate for a cadre post. This includes the standard of height, weight, chest measurement in normal position and in full expiration, eye sight, urine test and additional points including hearing capacity, speech capacity, that teeth, formation of chest, limbs, hands and feet are to be well formed and developed and with free and perfect motion of all joints, no congenial malformation or defect etc. It may be noted that these Rules were framed during a martial law administration but nevertheless remain enforceable to date. 10. That ten per cent of the total population of Bangladesh is living with different forms of disabilities, many due to natural and man made causes. Natural disaster, high rate of road

-::20::- accident, social and family violence, mal-nutrition, unavailability of vaccination, congenital malformation cause disabilities amongst other reasons. However, persons with disabilities have been able to complete their post graduation in competitive subjects from the best universities of the country and have entered various professional arena. 11. That the Petitioner No.1 is a visual impaired person. He obtained degrees in LL B (Hons) and LL M from Dhaka University in the years 2008 and 2009 respectively. He was enrolled as an Advocate by appearing in the written and viva voce examinations before the Bangladesh Bar Council. At present he is pursuing his profession as a lawyer. Petitioner No.1 also attempted to apply for the 28 th BCS Examination but was refused an admit card on the purported ground of his visual impairment and by reference to the BCS Rules. He brought this matter to the concern of the Honourable Prime Minister vide his letter, dated 29.3.2009, and requested her to grant quotas in

-::21::- favour of persons with disability. Mr. Shapan continued his efforts by sending reminder letters, dated 04.10.2009, 11.10.2009 and 18.3.2010, to the Prime Minister but has received no response to date. Under the said notice issued by the respondent No.6, Mr. Shapan will not be able to attend the 30 th BCS Examination as no accommodation for persons with disability is provided under the said notice. Letters, dated 04.10.2009, 11.10.2009 and 18.3.2010, sent by the Petitioner No.1 to the Prime Minister are attached herewith and marked as ANNEXURE D, D1, and D2 12. That the Prime Minister of the People s Republic of Bangladesh made a declaration of reserving quotas of ten percent in third class and fourth class employment and one percent in first class employment in public sector, on

-::22::- 19.10.2009. The Prime Minister made a repeatation of the said declaration on the National Disability Day, 2010, which was celebrated on 02.4.2010. Instead of repeated declaration made by the Prime Minister the respondents kept on ignoring the issue in case of employment in Bangladesh Civil Service. Press-clipping, dated 03.4.2010, containing the news of the declaration made by the Prime Minister is annexed herewith and marked as ANNEXURE E 13. That the petitioners through their lawyer served a registered Notice demanding justice on 01.4.2010 to the respondents calling upon them to ensure compliance with the provisions of the section 6(2) 6(2) of the Disability Welfare Act, 2001 (Act XII of 2001) read with Schedule Cha of the said Act and to publish a supplementary notice allowing the persons with disabilities in 30 th BCS Examination but no information of

-::23::- compliance has been received till now and as such it is clear that justice has been denied to the petitioners. A copy of the Demand for Justice Notice, dated 01.4.2010 is annexed herewith and marked as ANNEXURE F 14. That it is respectfully submitted that the right of persons with disabilities to not to be discriminated on the basis of disability with regard to all matters concerning all forms of employment has been persistently violated by the enactments of the legislature and other instruments, which have enforcement as a law. Amongst others the Schedule III of Bangladesh Civil Service (Age, Qualification and Examination for Direct Recruitment) Rules, 1982, being No. S.R.O. 142- L/82/ED/Recruitment/1-15/80 sets the standard for physical fitness of the eligible candidates for appointment to a cadre post. According to the said provisions of law, a candidate may

-::24::- be rejected for appointment, even after passing different stages of examinations, namely preliminary test, written examination, IQ test and Viva-voce, only if she or he is found to have a particular form of disability even though such disability may not be an impediment in performing the duties and responsibilities of the concerned cadre post. 15. That it is submitted that under Section 6(2) of the Disability Welfare Act, 2001 (Act XII of 2001) the Respondent No.11 is made responsible to direct or request the ministries or departments of the government for (i) taking necessary steps for identifying appropriate working arena and to create opportunities for disable people in such working arena; (ii) creating equal employment opportunities for competent persons with disabilities in appropriate services in the public sector, statutory corporations and in local government authorities; (iii) adopting measures for relaxing the age limit for persons with disabilities in the services of public sector, statutory

-::25::- corporations and in local government authorities; (iv) adopting measures for reserving appropriate quotas for persons with disabilities in the services of public sector, statutory corporations and in local government authorities as described in Schedule Cha of the said Act. 16. That it is further submitted that the fundamental right to freedom of profession or occupation has been recognised in Article 40 under Part III of the Constitution of the People s Republic of Bangladesh. It has been stated in the said Article Subject to any restrictions imposed by law every citizen possessing such qualifications, if any, as may be prescribed by law in relation to his profession, occupation, trade of business shall have the right to enter upon any lawful profession or occupation, and to conduct any lawful trade of business. At present persons with disabilities like the petitioner No.1 are deprived of being employed in the public sector in spite of possessing such qualifications as required to be employed as a

-::26::- BCS cadre officer. 17. That it is again submitted that in Article 27 it has been declared that all citizens are equal before law and are entitled to equal protection of law. But citizens of Bangladesh, who are with disabilities, are deprived of getting the opportunity for appearing in Bangladesh Civil Service Examination. 18. That it is again submitted that in Article 15 under Part II of the Constitution it has been recognised that it is a fundamental responsibility of the state to attain a constant increase of productive forces and a steady improvement in the material and cultural standard of living of the people with a view to securing the right to work to citizens of Bangladesh. In the present case without securing the right to work to citizens the respondents are persistently violating the fundamental rights of the citizens with disabilities to get the equal opportunity for appearing in the BCS examination and to be employed accordingly. 19. It is respectfully submitted that under Article 19(2) the

-::27::- State has been endowed with a duty to adopt effective measures to remove social and economic inequality between man and man and to ensure the equitable distribution of wealth among citizens, and of opportunities in order to attain a uniform level of economic development throughout the Republic. 20. That it is further submitted that under Article 20 work has been recognised as a right, a duty and a matter of honour for every citizen, who is capable of working and the State has been endowed with a duty to create conditions in which human labour in every form, intellectual and physical, shall become a fuller expression of creative endeavour and of the human personality. The existing legal regime regarding public employment creates hindrance on the way for creating conditions for human labour, intellectual and physical, to be recognised as the expression of creative endeavour and human personality. 21. That it is again submitted that Bangladesh has ratified the

-::28::- UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) on 30.11.2007. According to Article 27 of the Convention, Bangladesh has undertaken to safeguard and promote the realization of the right to work by taking appropriate steps, including through legislation, to prohibit discrimination on the basis of disability with regard to all matters concerning all forms of employment, including conditions of recruitment, hiring and employment, continuance of employment, career advancement and safe and healthy working conditions. 22. That it is further submitted that although the Honourable Prime Minister has declared one percent quota for citizens with disabilities in first class posts in public sector the respondents did not take any attempt to comply with the declaration of the Honourable Prime Minister. 23. That there is no other equally efficacious remedy or forum available to your petitioner except by way of this

-::29::- application. 24. That your petitioners file this application bona fide in public interest. 25. That it is respectfully stated that annexure A, A1 and A2 are academic and professional certificates of Petitioner No.1, annexure C is the S.R.O. 142-L/82/ED/Recruitment/1-15/80, dated 11.5.1982, a copy of the same is not available in BG Press, annexure D, D1 and D2 are letters sent by the petitioner No.1 to the Honourable Prime Minister and the Petitioner No.1 does not have the original copies in his custody and as such the petitioners crave permission to swear affidavits with photocopies of those documents as annexures. 26. That in the premises set forth above the petitioners beg to file this petition and to move before Your Lordships, in the Public Interest, on the following amongst other - G R O U N D S

-::30::- I. For that persistent deprivation of Bangladeshi citizens with disabilities from the opportunity of appearing in the Bangladesh Civil Services (BCS) Examinations and not allowing them to join any cadre as may be determined by the Bangladesh Public Service Commission is without lawful authority and is of no legal effect. II. For that the application of Schedule III of Bangladesh Civil Service (Age, Qualification and Examination for Direct Recruitment) Rules, 1982, being No. S.R.O. 142- L/82/ED/Recruitment/1-15/80 setting the standard for physical fitness of the eligible candidates for appointment to a cadre post of Bangladesh Civil Service, without considering the eligibility of citizens with disabilities to serve in such posts, is inconsistent with the provisions of Part III of Constitution of the People s Republic of Bangladesh. As such the S.R.O. 142-

-::31::- L/82/ED/Recruitment/1-15/80 is liable to be declared void to the extent of non considering the eligibility of citizens with disabilities to serve in appropriate posts of Bangladesh Civil Service. III. For that the respondent No.11 did not comply with the duties and obligations as conferred upon him under Section 6(2) of the Disability Welfare Act, 2001 (Act XII of 2001) Schedule Cha of the said Act. Hence the Respondent No.11 is liable to be directed to perform his functions in connection with the affairs of the Republic which he is required by the Disability Welfare Act, 2001 (Act XII of 2001). IV. For that depriving of persons with disabilities like Petitioner No.1 from appearing in the BCS examinations and from being employed in the appropriate cadres of Bangladesh Civil Service in spite of possessing such

-::32::- qualifications as required to be employed as a BCS cadre officer is a violation of Article 40 of the Constitution of the People s Republic of Bangladesh. As such the respondents are liable to be directed for allowing citizens with disabilities to appear in the 30 th BCS Examination and for applying their discretion to accommodate citizens with disabilities in appropriate posts in appropriate cadres. V. For that citizens of Bangladesh, who are with disabilities, are deprived of getting the opportunity for appearing in Bangladesh Civil Service Examination in violation of fundamental rights as described in Article 27 of the Constitution. And as such the respondents are liable to be directed for allowing citizens with disabilities to appear in the 30 th BCS Examination and for applying their discretion to accommodate citizens with disabilities in appropriate posts in appropriate cadres.

-::33::- VI. For that the respondents are persistently ignoring the liabilities and duties as conferred upon them under Articles 15, 19(2) and 20, as described in Part II of the Constitution, by not allowing the citizens with disabilities to appear in the 30 th BCS Examination. And as such the respondents are liable to be directed for allowing citizens with disabilities to appear in the 30 th BCS Examination and for applying their discretion to accommodate citizens with disabilities in appropriate posts in appropriate cadres. VII. For that Bangladesh has ratified the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) on 30.11.2007. According to Article 27 of the Convention, Bangladesh is under an obligation to safeguard and promote the realization of the right to work by taking appropriate steps, including through legislation, to prohibit discrimination on the basis of disability with regard to all

-::34::- matters concerning all forms of employment, including public services. And as such the respondents are liable to be directed for allowing citizens with disabilities to appear in the 30 th BCS Examination and for applying their discretion to accommodate citizens with disabilities in appropriate posts in appropriate cadres. VIII. For that in spite of repeated declaration of the Honourable Prime Minister for reserving one percent quota for citizens with disabilities in first class posts in public sector the respondents did not take any attempt to comply with the declaration of the Honourable Prime Minister in respect of Bngladesh Civil Service employment. And as such the respondents are liable to be directed for allowing citizens with disabilities to appear in the 30 th BCS Examination and for applying their discretion to accommodate citizens with disabilities in appropriate posts in appropriate cadres.

-::35::- IX. For that the petitioners have no speedy, expedient and equally efficacious remedy other than the remedy herein prayed for and it makes this application bona fide in public interest. Wherefore it is prayed that your Lordship would be pleased to:- (A) To issue a Rule Nisi calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why an order will not be passed directing the respondents for publishing a supplementary notice expressly specifying that there is no bar to citizens with disabilities from applying for 30 th BCS Examination

-::36::- 2010, in addition to the Notification, bearing File No. 80.200.046.00.00.001.2010-360, dated 08.3.2010, published by the Respondent No.8; (B) To issue a Rule Nisi calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why an order will not be passed directing the respondents for applying discretionary powers and performing duties of the respondents for ensuring the accommodation of citizens with disabilities in the appropriate

-::37::- cadre posts of Bangladesh civil service in compliance with Section 6(2) of the Disability Welfare Act, 2001 (Act XII of 2001) read with Schedule Cha of the said Act; (C) To issue a Rule Nisi calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why an order will not be passed declaring the application of Schedule III of Bangladesh Civil Service (Age, Qualification and Examination for Direct Recruitment) Rules, 1982, being No. S.R.O. 142- L/82/ED/Recruitment/1-15/80,

-::38::- dated 11.5.1982, in general and without considering the fundamental rights of the citizens with disabilities, to that extend to be, inconsistent with the Part III of the Constitution of the People s Republic of Banglaesh and as such void; (D) Pending disposal of the Rule (i) To direct the respondents to stay the operation of the Notification, bearing File No. 80.200.046.00.00.001.2010-360, dated 08.3.2010, published by the Respondent No.8, until the

-::39::- publication of a supplementary notice, expressly specifying that there is no bar to persons with disabilities from applying for 30 th BCS Examination 2010; (ii) To direct the respondents to submit a list within two weeks detailing the posts of appropriate cadres, under Bangladesh Civil Service, in which persons with disabilities can be accommodated; (E) After hearing the parties make the rule absolute;

-::40::- (F) To award costs of the petition to the petitioner; (G) To pass such other or further order or orders as to your Lordships may deem fit and proper; And for this act of kindness your petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray. A F F I D A V I T I, Shapan Chowkider, son of Md. Nurul Islam Chowkider, of Village: South Chakdh, Post: Chakdh Bazzer, Police Station- Naroia, District - Shariatpur, by profession advocate, aged about... years, by nationality Bangladeshi by birth do hereby solemnly affirm and say as follows:

-::41::- 1. That I am the Petitioner No.1 and conversant with the facts and circumstances of this case and competent to swear this affidavit. 2. That the statements made above are true to the best of my knowledge and belief. Prepared in my office Advocate Deponent The deponent is known to me and identified by me. Solemnly affirmed before me by the said deponent this the..... day of April 2010 at..... Advocate COMMISSIONER OF AFFIDAVIT SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION, DHAKA A F F I D A V I T I, Sultana Kamal wife of Supriyo Chakravorty, Executive Director of Ain o Salish Kendra, (ASK) of 26/3, Purana Paltan Line, Police Station- Motijheel, District- Dhaka, by profession advocate and social worker, aged about 54 years, by nationality Bangladeshi by birth do hereby solemnly affirm and say as follows:

-::42::- 1. That I am the Executive Director of the Petitioner organization No.2 and conversant with the facts and circumstances of this case and competent to swear this affidavit. 2. That the statements made above are true to the best of my knowledge and belief. Prepared in my office Advocate Deponent The deponent is known to me and identified by me. Solemnly affirmed before me by the said deponent this the..... day of April 2010 at..... Advocate COMMISSIONER OF AFFIDAVIT SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION, DHAKA A F F I D A V I T I, Ambassador (Retd.) Mohsin Ali Khan, son of........., Executive Director of Bangladesh Legal Aid and Services Trust (BLAST) of 1/1, pioneer Road (3 rd floor), YMCA Bhaban, Kakrail, Dhaka, Police Station- Ramna, District- Dhaka, by profession social worker, aged about... years, by nationality

-::43::- Bangladeshi by birth do hereby solemnly affirm and say as follows: 1. That I am the Executive Director of the Petitioner organization No.3 and conversant with the facts and circumstances of this case and competent to swear this affidavit. 2. That the statements made above are true to the best of my knowledge and belief. Prepared in my office Advocate Deponent The deponent is known to me and identified by me. Solemnly affirmed before me by the said deponent this the..... day of April 2010 at..... Advocate COMMISSIONER OF AFFIDAVIT SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION, DHAKA A F F I D A V I T I, Md. Mosharraf Hossain, son of........., Country Representative of Action for Disability and Development (ADD),

-::44::- of........., Police Station- Gulshan, District- Dhaka, by profession social worker, aged about... years, by nationality Bangladeshi by birth do hereby solemnly affirm and say as follows: 1. That I am the Country Representative of the Petitioner organization No.4 and conversant with the facts and circumstances of this case and competent to swear this affidavit. 2. That the statements made above are true to the best of my knowledge and belief. Prepared in my office Advocate Deponent The deponent is known to me and identified by me. Solemnly affirmed before me by the said deponent this the..... day of April 2010 at..... Advocate COMMISSIONER OF AFFIDAVIT SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION, DHAKA