Juvenile Drug Arrests in CY2011- Disproportionate Minority Contact

Similar documents
COOLIDGE POLICE DEPARTMENT. Monthly Activity Report

Bond Analysis Public Safety

Identifying Chronic Offenders

Disproportionate Minority Contact. by Moire Kenny Maine Statistical Analysis Center Muskie School of Public Service

Disproportionate Representation of Minorities in the Alaska Juvenile Justice System. Phase I Report

Maine Statistical Analysis Center. USM Muskie School of Public Service.

SENATE SPONSORSHIP. Bill Summary

UC POLICE DEPARTMENT REPORTS DASHBOARD

Health Care Worker Background Check Disqualifying Crimes

UC POLICE DEPARTMENT REPORTS DASHBOARD

Jail Operations. Courthouse Security. Electronic Home Monitoring. Chief Joyce Klein Lieutenant Carolyn Parnow

CENTER FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE RESEARCH, POLICY AND PRACTICE

JUVENILE JUSTICE IN ILLINOIS 2015

AN ANALYSIS OF INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE CASE PROCESSING AND SENTENCING USING NIBRS DATA, ADJUDICATION DATA AND CORRECTIONS DATA

Sentencing Chronic Offenders

Options of court at dispositional hearing. If in its decree the juvenile court finds that the child comes within the purview of this chapter,

DETENTION UTILIZATION STUDY BROWARD COUNTY JUNE Office of Research and Data Integrity Florida Department of Juvenile Justice

Apache County Criminal Justice Data Profile

Scotts Bluff County Juvenile Justice Data 2012

Selected Ohio Felony Sentencing Statutes Ohio Rev. Code Ann

As Introduced. Regular Session H. B. No

DESCHUTES COUNTY ADULT JAIL L. Shane Nelson, Sheriff Jail Operations Approved by: March 22, 2016 FORCED RELEASES

TO: All Article 19-A Motor Carriers and Certified Examiners. SUBJECT: Chapter 189 of the Laws of New Disqualification for School Bus Drivers

FOCUS. Native American Youth and the Juvenile Justice System. Introduction. March Views from the National Council on Crime and Delinquency

Subject Area Breakdown NPPF Step 2 Sergeants Examination Actus Reus (Criminal. Crime Criminal Damage Arson Contamination or Interference

CENTER ON JUVENILE AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE

Colorado Legislative Council Staff

Section Five INDEX OFFENSE ANALYSIS. Population Groups Urban-Suburban-Rural Municipalities Colleges and Universities. Index Offense Analysis

DETENTION UTILIZATION STUDY PINELLAS COUNTY JUNE Office of Research and Data Integrity Florida Department of Juvenile Justice

AN ACT. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Ohio:

Pinellas County Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative (JDAI) 2016 Work Plan

DETENTION UTILIZATION STUDY HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY JUNE Office of Research and Data Integrity Florida Department of Juvenile Justice

Center for Criminal Justice Research, Policy & Practice: The Rise (and Partial Fall) of Illinois Prison Population. Research Brief

Table 1a 1 Police-reported Crime Severity Indexes, Barrie, 2006 to 2016

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEBANON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION FAMILY DIVISION CRIMINAL RECORD/ABUSE HISTORY VERIFICATION

} SS. Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Criminal Court Division. The State of Ohio,

Sandusky County Sheriff s Office Frequently Asked CCW Questions. Carrying Concealed Handgun Permits

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ARMSTRONG COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA FAMILY DIVISION., : Plaintiff : : vs. : :, : Defendant : NO.

FINGERPRINT CLEARANCE: DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ARREST, PROSECUTION & CONVICTION

Contents. June Get Notified! Sign-up to community notifications by texting to or visit lincolnil.gov for more information.

Juveniles Prosecuted in State Criminal Courts

STANDARDS GOVERNING THE USE OF SECURE DETENTION UNDER THE JUVENILE ACT 42 Pa.C.S et seq.

Ohio Felony Sentencing Statutes Ohio Rev. Code Ann (2018)

Sentencing Factors that Limit Judicial Discretion and Influence Plea Bargaining

TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I: FUNDAMENTALS INTRODUCTION 1. CHAPTER ONE: CRIME AND PUNISHMENT 5 Overview of Crimes 5 Types of Crimes and Punishment 8

Alameda County Probation Department A Look into Probation Monthly Statistical Report January 2012

Getting People with Criminal Records Hired: What Employment Specialists Need to Know

Earned credit for productive program participation.

Sentencing in Colorado

Subject Area Breakdown NPPF Step 2 Inspectors Examination Actus Reus (Criminal. Crime Crime Child Protection Child Abduction

Allegheny County Detention Screening Study

TABLE B SELECTED CRIME OF VIOLENCE DEFINITIONS (and related lists of serious crimes) Prepared by Joe Cox, House Research March 15, 2002

MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2018

TECUMSEH LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 9760 W. NATIONAL RD. NEW CARLISLE, OH Social Security Number will be requested if hired.

Senate Bill 107 Sponsored by Senator THATCHER (at the request of Rosana Sherwood) (Presession filed.)

MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2017

Criminal Record/Abuse History Verification

Racial Disparities in Youth Commitments and Arrests

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING REGARDING MONTGOMERY COUNTY RJIP S YOUTH AID PANEL PILOT DIVERSION PROGRAM

Age Limits for Juvenile Law. Maneuvering through the labyrinth of the juvenile justice system begins with a

MINNESOTA SENTENCING GUIDELINES COMMISSION. Assault Sentencing Practices Assault Offenses and Violations of Restraining Orders Sentenced in 2015

CAMDEN CITY JUVENILE ARRESTS

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FOR HUNTINGDON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION - LAW

New York State Violent Felony Offense Processing 2016 Annual Report

Individual Incident Entry (IIE) To begin entering a Group A or Group B incident into the state repository, click the Incident / Arrest button.

Arizona Crime Trends: A System Review,

Date Jan. 5, 2016 Original X Amendment Prepared: Bill No: HB 037 Correction Substitute. APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)

Standards. SSCG21 The student will describe the causes and effects of criminal activity.

DETERMINATE SENTENCING

cook county state,s attorney DATA REPORT

JUVENILE WITHIN TOTAL M..l\.LE COURT TOTAL RELEASED AGENCY SOUGHT MALE FEMALE TOTAL DEPT AGENCY PROB. FELONY HOMICIDE MURDER

(C) Under this Ordinance, any person who engages in any sexual

Felony Defendants in Large Urban Counties, 2000

Who Is In Our State Prisons?

Breakdown of the Types of Specific Criminal Convictions Associated with Criminal Aliens Placed in a Non-Custodial Setting in Fiscal Year 2015

Pretrial Release of Felony Defendants, 1992

NIBRS Crime Types. Crimes Against Persons. Murder. Aggravated Assault. Forcible Sex Offenses. Non Forcible Sex Offenses. Kidnapping/Abduction

Criminal Gangs/Gang-Free Zones

MINNESOTA STATUTES 2016

DELAWARE COUNTY YOUNG OFFENDER PROGRAM APPLICATION DELAWARE COUNTY COURTHOUSE MEDIA, PENNSYLVANIA 19063

First Regular Session Seventy-second General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED. Bill Summary

ALA CODE 13A-3-20 : Alabama Code - Section 13A-3-20: DEFINITIONS

DOC Population Drivers: Increase in Felony Filings

Santa Monica College

DETENTION UTILIZATION STUDY PALM BEACH COUNTY JUNE Office of Research and Data Integrity Florida Department of Juvenile Justice

The Put-In-Bay Police Department 431 Catawba Avenue

Ventura County Probation Agency. Juvenile Detention Alternative Initiatives and Pretrial Services

Offences specified in Schedule 15 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003

California Department of Justice - Criminal Justice Statistics Center. Data Characteristics and Known Limitations Charges Criminal Justice Glossary

ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT BACKGROUND QUESTIONNAIRE

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiff - Appellee, No v. (D. Kansas) HARLEY YOAKUM, ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Malaysia. 1. Police personnel, by sex, and financial resources, Rate 2005 Rate 2006

Section Six CRIME IN THE CITIES

Concealed Handguns: Danger or Asset to Texas?

NEW YORK STATE WEST YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION (NYSWYSA) Risk Management Background Check Policy

Lakeland University. Campus Security Authority Incident Report Form. Date Incident Reported to CSA: MM/DD/YYYY. First and Last Name: Department:

DISPROPORTIONATE MINORITY CONTACT

AMENDED ORDER GOVERNING THE MOVEMENT OF SELECTED INMATES INTO COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS PROGRAMS, OSCEOLA COUNTY

Prepared by: Meghan Ogle, M.S.

Section Six CRIME IN THE CITIES

Transcription:

Disproportionate Minority Contact 1 Juvenile Drug Arrests in CY2011- Disproportionate Minority Contact Research Brief Prepared by Kanako Ishida, Policy Research Analyst Juvenile Justice Initiative Juvenile Justice Initiative 518 Davis Street, Suite 211 Evanston, Illinois 20201 847-864-1567 www.jjustice.org December, 2012

Disproportionate Minority Contact 2 Acknowledgements We wish to acknowledge the assistance of those who provided data and guidance for this report: Christine Devitt, Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority Mark Powers, Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority Erica Hughes, Illinois Criminal justice Information Authority Gratitude to the Juvenile Justice Initiative funders

Disproportionate Minority Contact 3 Executive Summary The overrepresentation of minority youth (Disproportionate minority contact (DMC)) in the juvenile justice system is of great concern. Using data retrieved from the Criminal History Record Information, this report examines Illinois youth arrest data to see if there is a disproportionate percentage of minority youth. The following report summarizes the facts on disproportionality in Illinois juvenile arrests in CY2011. In Illinois in CY2011, African American youth were over represented at the point of arrests at a level triple their representation in the general youth population (RI=3). Although only thirty nine percent of youth (up to 17 years of age) are in Cook County, sixty four percent of arrests came from Cook County in CY2011. Cook County accounted for 69 percent of overall Illinois drug offense arrests Juvenile Drug Arrests CY2011 Cook NonCook 31% 69% More than half of drug offense arrests involved African American youth statewide in CY2011. African American youth were overly represented in drug arrests at a level double their representation in Cook County youth population (RI=2.23) Fifty two percent of African American youth arrested for drug offense in Cook County was arrested for felonious charge while only nine percent of white youth were arrested for felonious charge.

Disproportionate Minority Contact 4 Background Disproportionate minority contact (DMC) in the juvenile justice system, which refers to an empirical finding that a higher percentage of minority youth are involved in the juvenile justice system than their representation in the general population 1 has been of increasing concern. It has been revealed that racial minority youth, especially African American youth, are generally more likely to have contact with the juvenile justice system from arrest to confinement. The research brief examines the DMC of youth arrests, specifically drug offense arrests, in Illinois and in Cook County. Data Juvenile arrest numbers were obtained from the Criminal History Record Information (CHRI) on October 17, 2012, and juvenile population numbers were obtained from the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Ethnicity codes related to Hispanic are not collected in the CHRI; thus Hispanic youth could be categorized in any race (i.e., African American, white or others). The CHRI has arrest records of youth up to the age 17. Overall, the juvenile arrest numbers reveal a disproportionately large number of African American youth, with the majority of the arrested youth from Cook County. Juvenile Population There were 1,417,154 youth aged 10-17 in Illinois in CY2011. Seventy six percent of the youth population was White, and nineteen percent was African American in Illinois. Cook County accounted for thirty nine percent of the state wide youth population sixty two percent of the Cook youth population was White, and thirty one percent was African American. Table 1 shows the Illinois juvenile population breakdown by race. Illinois Youth Population, CY2011 Cook 39% Non Cook 61% 1 Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority (2011). Juvenile Justice System and Risk Factor Data-2008 Annual Report.

Disproportionate Minority Contact 5 Illinois Juvenile Population Age 10-17 CY2011 White African American Others 5% 19% 76% Cook Juvenile Population Age 10-17, CY2011 White African American Others 7% 32% 61% Juvenile Arrests There were 51,655 juvenile arrests in CY2011. The most common offense statewide was property offense 2 (17,175), followed by person offense 3 (13,556). 2 Property offenses here include: Deception, motor vehicle theft, criminal damage & trespass to property, theft and arson 3 Person offenses include: child abuse, kidnapping, harassment, assault, robbery, intimidation, ritualism, aggravated drug related child endanger, criminal abortion, and other person offenses (e.g., inducement to suicide)

Disproportionate Minority Contact 6 Illinois Juvenile Arrests Cook Non Cook Illiois 17175 9603 13556 10915 12042 5020 2269 7289 91 19 110 3953 6260 833 1175 161147308 342 62135829 Drugs Homicide Person Property Sex Weapons Others Cook County accounted for a disproportionately large number of juvenile arrests, 64 percent (32,836), despite the fact that Cook accounts for only 39 percent of youth population. Illinois Juvenile Arrests, CY2011 Non Cook 36% Cook 64%

Disproportionate Minority Contact 7 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Disproportionality of Arrests by Location Youth Population Youth Arrests Non Cook Cook Offense Class Youth were arrested for offenses in different classes: felony, misdemeanor and petty. The majority of the youth were arrested for misdemeanor offense (58 %) and thirty percent of youth were for felonies. Twelve percent of arrest offense classes were unknown in CY2011. Illinois Juvenile Arrests by Offense Class Felony Misdemeanor Others/Unknown 12% 30% 58% Racial Disparity African American youth have been much more likely to be involved in the juvenile justice system than white youth. In CY2011, the data reveal that African American youth were arrested at a much higher rate than white youth. There were 51,655 juvenile arrests across Illinois in CY2011. Fifty seven percent of arrests involved African American youth, and forty two percent involved white youth in Illinois. That is, in Illinois in CY2011, African American youth were over represented at the point of arrests at a level triple their representation in the general

Disproportionate Minority Contact 8 youth population (RI=3). 4 On the other hand, white youth were under-represented and arrested at a level about 45 percent less than their representation in Illinois youth population (RI=0.55). In non-cook, African American youth are still over-represented at a level triple their representation in the general non Cook youth population (RI=3).Table 3 details the juvenile arrest frequencies by race. Illinois Youth Arrests by Race White African American Othesrs 1% 42% 57% Disproportionality in Illinois 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Illinois Pop Illinois Arrest Other African American White 4 The representation index (RI) is calculated as the following: Percent of African American youth arrests divided by percent of African American youth in the general population. An RI of 1.0 would be equal representation in the general population and in the system. An RI less than 1.0 means under-representation, and over 1.0 means overrepresentation. Table 5 details RI and percentage used for calculation.

Disproportionate Minority Contact 9 There was no racial disparity between statewide offense classes. That is, it was not the case that African American youth were arrested predominantly for felonious offenses rather than misdemeanor offenses. Fifty eight percent of arrests for both felonious offenses and misdemeanor offenses involved African American youth, and 41 percent of arrests for both of the offenses involved white youth. Statewide Felony Arrests by Race White African American Others 1% 41% 58% Statewide Misdemeanor Arrests by Race White African American Others 1% 41% 58% Racial disparity in arrests remained when looking only at Cook County. Sixty four percent (32,836) of arrests happened in Cook County. Only 28 percent of Cook County arrests involved White, and seventy one percent involved African American youth. This number is striking in that African American youth accounted for only thirty two percent of Cook youth population in CY2011; African American youth were over represented at the point of arrest at a level of 2.23 time higher their representation in Cook county youth population (RI=2.23). On the other hand, white youth were under-represented at the arrest (RI=0.46).

Disproportionate Minority Contact 10 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Disproportionality in Cook County Cook Population Cook Arrests Other African American White Drug Offense African American youth involvement in drug offense 5 arrests has been of particular concern of DMC. In 2011, there were 7,289 arrests statewide related to drug offenses, 54 percent (3,289 arrests) of which involved African American youth. This means that African American youth were over-represented at a level almost triple their representation in the general population (RI=2.84). Juvenile Drug Arrests CY2011 Cook NonCook 31% 69% 5 Drug charges are by statutes, so that the charges include liquor control act violations, use of controlled substance and dealing of controlled substance

Disproportionate Minority Contact 11 There was a difference in drug offense classes between African American youth and white youth. Although misdemeanor drug offense arrests were equally distributed between African American and white youth, sixty four percent of felonious drug offense arrests involved African American youth. Statewide Misdemeanor Drug Arrests White African American Others 1% 50% 49% Statewide Felony Drug Arrests White African American Others 1% 35% 64% While thirty eight percent of African American youth arrested for drug offenses were arrested for felonious offenses, 25 percent of white youth were arrested for felonious offenses.

Disproportionate Minority Contact 12 White Youth Drug Arrests by Offense Class Felony 25% Misdemeanor 75% African American Youth Drug Arrests by Offense Class Felony 38% Misdemeanor 62% Sixty nine percent (5,020 arrests) of Illinois drug arrests happened in Cook County. Of 5,020 arrests in Cook County, 71 percent involved African American. This means African American youth were overly represented in drug arrests at a level double their representation in Cook County youth population (RI=2.23). On the other hand, twenty nine percent of Cook County drug offense arrests involved White and others (RI=0.47 & RI=0.1 respectively). Table 4 details the frequencies of juvenile drug arrests.

Disproportionate Minority Contact 13 100% Cook County Drug Arrest Disproportionality 80% 60% 40% 20% Others African American White 0% Cook Population Cook Drug Arrest This also means that although African American youth represent only 19 percent of the general youth population in Illinois, Cook County s African American drug arrests accounted for 49 percent of statewide drug arrests (54 percent of Illinois drug arrests involved African American youth). The over-representation of African American youth remains in Non-Cook area (Table 6). This racial disproportionality is striking considering that the recent study 6 conducted by researchers at Department of Psychiatry at Duke University reveals that white youth are more likely to use substances, especially hard drugs, than African American youth. 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Disproportionality of Drug Arrests IL Youth Poulation Cook Drug Arrest Others African American White The disparity in Cook drug offense classes between African American and white youth was larger than that across the state. Fifty two percent of African American youth arrested for drug offense in Cook County was arrested for felonious drug offense while only nine percent of white youth were arrested for felonious charge. 6 Wu, L., Woody, G.E., Yang, C., Pan, J., & Blazer, D. G. (2011). Racial/Ethnic Variations in Substance-Related Disorders among Adolescents in the United States. Achieve of General Psychiatry, 68, 1176-1185.

Disproportionate Minority Contact 14 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Drug Arrest Offense Class in Cook County Misdemeanor Felony White African American Others Felonious drug arrests among Cook youth are not equally distributed. African American youth arrested for felonious drug offense in Cook accounted for 85 percent of felony drug arrests, and only 15 percent of such arrests involved white youth. Sixty four percent of misdemeanor drug arrest involved African American youth. Felonious Drug Offense Arrest by Race in Cook County White African American Others 0% 15% 85%

Disproportionate Minority Contact 15 Misdemeanor Drug Arrests in Cook County by Race White African American Others 1% 35% 64% In summary, there are a much higher number of juvenile arrests in Cook County than in the rest of the state. In both Cook County and across the state, African American youth are arrested at much higher levels than white youth. Furthermore, African American youth are more likely to be arrested for drug offenses. In fact, almost half of drug offense arrests involve African American youth in Cook County. These disparities indicate a need for renewed attention to reduce disparities at the front end of the system, particularly for low level property and drug offenses.

Disproportionate Minority Contact 16 Table 1. Juvenile Population Age 10-17 by Race Cook Non Cook Illinois White 337,288 (62%) 734,145 (84%) 1,071,433 (76%) African American 173,929 (32%) 95,222 (11%) 269,151 (19%) Other 36,570 (7%) 40,000 (5%) 76,570 (5%) Total 547,787 (100%) 869,367 (100%) 1,417,154 (100%)

Disproportionate Minority Contact 17 Table 2. Juvenile Arrests Breakdown by Age Cook Non-Cook IL 17 10,808 (33%) 6,457 (34%) 17,265(33%) 13-16 21,199 (65%) 11,536 (61%) 32,735 (63%) Under 13 829 (3%) 826 (4%) 1,655(3%) Total 32,836 (100%) 18,819 (100%) 51,655 (100%)

Disproportionate Minority Contact 18 Table 3. Juvenile Arrests in Illinois by Race Cook Non Cook Total White 9,356 (28%) 12,257 (65%) 21,613 African American 23,286 (71%) 6,194 (33%) 29,480 Others 194(1%) 368 (2%) 562 Total 32,836 (100%) 18,819 (100%) 51,655 *Ethnicity codes related to Hispanic are not collected in CHRI

Disproportionate Minority Contact 19 Table 4. Juvenile Drug Arrests Drug Offense Cook Non Cook Total White 1,438 (28%) 1,831 (81%) 3,269 (45%) African American 3,550 (71%) 388 (17%) 3,938 (54%) Others 32 (1%) 50 (7%) 82 (1%) Total 5,020 (100%) 2,269 (100%) 7,289 (100%)

Disproportionate Minority Contact 20 Table5. Percentage Breakdown of Drug Offense Arrests by Race and by County Drug Offense Cook Non Cook Total White 20% 25% 45% African American 49% 5% 54% Others 0.40% 0.70% 1% 100%

Table 6. Representation Index RI Arrest Population IL White 0.55 42% 76% IL African American 3 57% 19% Cook White 0.46 28% 62% Cook African American 2.23 71% 32% Non Cook White 0.77 65% 84% Non Cook African American 3.00 33% 11% IL Drug White 0.59 45% 76% IL Drug African American 2.84 54% 19% Cook Drug White 0.47 29% 62% Cook Drug African American 2.23 71% 32% Non Cook Drug White 0.96 81% 84% Non Cook Drug African American 1.55 17% 11% Disproportionate Minority Contact 21

Disproportionate Minority Contact 22 Table 7. Percentage of CY2011 Arrests by Race, Compared to Population Race Cook Arrests Cook Drug Arrests White 28% (-34%*) 20% (-42%*) African 71% 49% American (+39%*) (+17%*) Other 1% 0.4% (+0.6%*) (-6.6%*) *Compared to population Cook Pop Non Cook Arrests 62% 65% (-19%*) 32% 33% (+22%*) 7% 2% (-3%*) Non Cook Drug Arrests 25% (-59%*) 5% (-6%*) 0.7% (-4.3%*) Non Cook Pop 84% 11% 5%