Reality of Consent. Reality of Consent. Reality of Consent. Chapter 13

Similar documents
MISTAKE. (1) the other party to the contract knew or should have known of the mistake; or

Genuine Agreement (Genuine Assent)

Define genuine agreement and rescission. Identify when duress occurs. Describe how someone may exercise undue influence.

CHAPTER 8: GENUINE AGREEMENT

Question 1: I read that a mentally impaired adult s contracts may be void or voidable. Which is it?

FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION

CONTRACT LAW. Elements of a Contract

Attorney for Plaintiffs SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO SOUTH COUNTY REGIONAL CENTER

Genuineness of Assent

Accountants Liability. An accountant may be liable under common law due to negligence or fraud.

Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER. EDGARDO RODRIGUEZ, an individual,

CONTRACT LAW SUMMARY

REVIEW QUESTIONS TRUE/FALSE QUESTIONS (CIRCLE THE CORRECT ANSWER)

AN INTRODUCTION TO THE LAW OF CONTRACT

CHAPTER 6 GENUINE AGREEMENTS Student Note Sheet

Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California. Law & Order Code TITLE 3 TORTS. [Last Amended 10/1/04. Current Through 2/3/09.]

BUSINESS LAW Chapter 6 PowerPoint Notes & Assignment Genuine Agreement

Study Notes & Practice Questions. Updated 2018 Exams

ARCHITECTS REGISTRATION COUNCIL SEMINARS

LIABILITY IN RESPECT OF OFFERING OF INTERESTS IN A CAYMAN ISLANDS EXEMPTED LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

Review of Elements of Fraud

Undue Influence, Mistake, Misrepresenta3on & Fraud. Chapter 7 Genuine Assent

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. No.

SOLUTION BUSINESS AND CORPORATE LAW NOV 2012

CHAPTER 4 CONCEPT OF CONSENSUS CONSENSUS AS BASIS FOR CONTRACTUAL COMMITMENT INTENTION TO BE CONTRACTUALLY BOUND MAKING INTENTION KNOWN COMMON

Chinese Contract Law: A Brief Introduction. ZHANG Xuezhong. Assistant Professor of Law.

This quiz differed from previous quizzes in focusing more on the specific cases read.

EBERHARD SCHONEBURG, ) SECURITIES LAWS

26 th Annual IBA/IFA Joint Conference Managing Risks in International Franchising May 18-19, 2010 JW Marriott Hotel in Washington, DC.

OVERVIEW OF CONTRACT LAW

RESCISSION OF CONTRACTS IN CALIFORNIA

RC Steenkamp 24 April 2018

Class B.Com. I Sem. (Hons.)


BUSINESS AND CORPORATE LAW NOV 2010

CHAPTER 2 CONTRACT LAWS INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, A contract is an agreement made between two or more parties which the law will enforce.

Contract Law for Paralegals: Chapter 8 Chapter 8

Illegality. Illegality. Meaning of Illegality. Irwin/McGraw-Hill 2001 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

INFORMAL OPINION Hiring Private Investigator to Friend Opposing Party. On Social Networking Site

CASE NO. 1D John R. Dowd, Jr., and Charles G. Brackins of The Dowd Law Firm, P.A., Ft. Walton Beach, for Appellant.

U.C.A Title. This chapter is known as the Utah False Claims Act.

107 ADOPTED RESOLUTION

ELEMENTS OF LIABILITY AND RISK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION

Second Look Series AGENCY TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Preface... iii Preface to the First Edition... v Table of Cases... TC-1 Table of Statutes... TS-1

MLL217 MISLEADING CONDUCT AND ECONOMIC TORTS

Contents. Table of Statutes. Table of Secondary Legislation. Table of Cases. The Agreement to Contract

Page 1 of 7. Fall 2015 Business Law Fundamentals O'Hara 2015 E

MILLER v. WILLIAM CHEVROLET/GEO, INC. 326 Ill. App. 3d 642; 762 N.E.2d 1 (1 st Dist. 2001)

CONTRACT LAW IN THE SOUTH PACIFIC

Case 0:17-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/13/2017 Page 1 of 12

Contents. Table of Statutes. Table of Secondary Legislation. Table of Cases. The Agreement to Contract

Liberty American Ins. Group, Inc. v. WestPoint Underwriters, L.L.C., 199 F.Supp.2d 1271 (M.D.Fla. 2001)

Contract Law Final Exam Version C

Business Law Fundamentals Exam #1 Page 1 of 7

CONTRACT LAW (2) Il est précisé que le thème «CONTRACT LAW» est abordé à travers 2 fiches, cette fiche étant la seconde. I. VALIDITY OF THE CONTRACT

MLL111- Exam Notes Contract Law (All Topics + Cases)

Exam #2 LAWS 3930 Page 1 of 6

Michigan Medicaid False Claims Act

Case 5:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/12/16 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:1

Legal Liability in Adventure Tourism

Wire Harness & Cable Connector ATLANTA PREVIEW... P ROD PRODUCTION & HANDLING EMPHASIS...P HEAT & SURFACE TREATMENT SPOTLIGHT...P.

Commercial Real Estate Law & Liability 3 Hour Continuing Education Elective Course

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION STANDARDS FOR IMPOSING LAWYER SANCTIONS

8:11-cv LSC -TDT Doc # 8 Filed: 08/16/11 Page 1 of 23 - Page ID # 16

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

CONTRACT DISPUTES: WINNING FROM THE BEGINNING

Spring 2018 Business Law Fundamentals O'Hara 2018 D

Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE SOUTHWEST JUSTICE CENTER. LYDIA HERNANDEZ, an individual,

Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER. NAOMI BOINUS-REEHORST, an individual;

Law of Contracts. Determining Contractual Intent. Offer. 6 Elements of Legally Enforceable Contracts

Chapter 9: Contract Formation. Copyright 2009 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning.

requires a + = WHAT IS IN A CONTRACT? by to another to create.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Chapter List. Real Estate Broker, Escrow Agent and Notary Liability

Case 8:13-cv CJC-JPR Document 1 Filed 08/15/13 Page 1 of 29 Page ID #:1

Business Law PRECISION EXAMS

LEVEL 4 - UNIT 1 CONTRACT LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS JANUARY 2015

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA

District > Intermediate > Business Education > Business Law ( ) (District) > Juett, David

NEGATIVE TEN COURSE POINTS

CONTRACTS. A contract is a legally enforceable agreement between two or more parties whereby they make the future more predictable.

Contractual Remedies Act 1979

Formation 1 / Certificate in Business and Accounting.

University of Miami School of Law. CONTRACTS PROFESSOR ROBERT ROSEN Fall Syllabus 1

SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Intentional Torts. What Is a Tort? Tort Recovery

ANSON S LAW OF CONTRACT. 29th Edition SIR JACK BEATSON

1. Under what theory, or theories, if any, might Patty bring an action against Darby? Discuss.

CONTRACTUAL CAPACITY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA

Intentional Torts. What Is a Tort? Tort Recovery

Risk Management: Practical ways to manage risks of prior representations

CONTRACTS AND SALES QUESTION 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

2016CI21911 CAUSE NO. v. JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION. COMES NOW GRUPO INTEGRADORA SOLAR, SAPI DE CV (hereinafter, GIS ),

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/28/2011 INDEX NO /2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 4 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/28/2011

on your blue computer graded bubble sheet in the appropriate location.

1. The physical element of a crime is the a. mens rea b. actus reus c. offence d. intention

Transcription:

Reality of Consent Chapter 13 Reality of Consent It is crucial to the economy and commerce that the law be counted on to enforce contracts. However, in some cases there are compelling reasons to permit people to avoid or escape their contracts. e.g., Agreements obtained by force, trickery, unfair persuasion, or error Reality of Consent The law views agreements obtained by force, trickery, unfair persuasion, or error as to be not entered into with actual or real consent of the victim party. Hence, reality of consent 1

Effect of Doctrines Discussed in This Chapter Contracts induced by the following are voidable: Misrepresentation Fraud Mistake Duress Undue influence Effect of Doctrines Discussed in This Chapter If a contract is voidable, the protected party (person who s consent was not real) has the power to rescind the contract. Both parties must return any consideration received Protected party also has option to enforce K at her option (hence, voidable) Necessity for Prompt and Unequivocal Rescission A contract may be deemed ratified unless it is rescinded promptly and unequivocally. Ratification ends the right to rescind. To rescind, protected party must avoid any behavior that suggests affirmation or ratification. E.g., Unreasonable delay in notification of rescission; continued acceptance of benefits. 2

Relationship Between Misrepresentation and Fraud A contract may be rescinded because of misrepresentation or fraud. A contract may be rescinded whether the misrepresentation is innocent or fraudulent. A misrepresentation is an assertion that is not true. Not necessary that the misrepresentation be intentional Can be innocent Not intentionally deceptive Or fraudulent Made with knowledge of falsity and intent to deceive Fraud is a misrepresentation that is made with scienter. Scienter defendant knew it was false or acted in reckless disregard of the truth. Election of Remedies A defendant who commits fraud may also be liable for the tort of deceit. Defendant may be liable for plaintiff s economic losses and for punitive damages. Fraud is also a crime, often a felony Requirements for Rescission Because of Misrepresentation An untrue assertion of a fact. The fact was material or the assertion was fraudulent. Actual and justifiable reliance. Economic injury if suing for damages for deceit. 3

Untrue Assertion of Fact Defendant s assertion must be of a past or existing fact rather than an opinion or prediction. Concealment through some active conduct is equivalent to a fraudulent assertion. Nondisclosure when there is a duty to disclose may constitute a fraudulent assertion. Materiality Materiality is required if the misrepresentation was innocent. A fact is material if it is likely to play a significant role in inducing a reasonable person to enter the contract. Materiality is not required if the misrepresentation was fraudulent. Actual Reliance There must be a causal relation between the assertion and the decision to enter the contract. 4

Justifiable Reliance Reliance is not justifiable if the assertion is obviously false or not to be taken seriously. (e.g., secret decoder ring in Cracker Jacks) In some cases, plaintiff may have a duty to make a good faith effort to determine or discover the facts (e.g., public records; could be discovered through reasonable inspection) Modern courts: Likely wouldn t make reliance unreasonable unless degree of fault so extreme as to amount to a failure to act in good faith and in accordance with reasonable standards of fair dealing. Today s courts tend to place greater accountability on person making assertion rather than on the person relying on the assertion. Mistake Under certain circumstances, parties may avoid their contracts because of mutual or unilateral mistake. The doctrine of mistake prevents unexpected and unbargained for losses. Mistake a belief about a fact that is not in accord with the truth. Mistakes of Law Although everyone is presumed to know the law, modern cases have granted relief for mistakes of law. Old rule held that mistake of law was not grounds for recission 5

Negligence and the Right to Avoid for Mistake Failing to know or discover facts before entering a contract will not bar relief unless plaintiff s fault amounts to failure to act in good faith. Effect of Mistake Mistakes that may allow a party to avoid a contract may be mutual (both parties) or unilateral (one party). Legal analysis will hinge on whether mistake is mutual or unilateral Mutual Mistakes in Drafting Writings The parties to an oral agreement may mistakenly transcribe one or more terms in the agreement. The remedy is reformation of the writing, rather than rescission of the agreement. 6

Mutual Mistake When both parties to a contract are mistaken, the adversely affected party may possibly, under certain circumstances, avoid the contact. Requirements for Mutual Mistake Relates to a basic assumption on which the contract was made. Basic assumption: House sale contract assumes house exists and is fit and legal for habitation Not basic assumption: A party s financial ability or market conditions. Has material effect on the agreed upon exchange. Mistake must be so severe as to make enforcement of contract unfair Adversely affected party did not bear risk of the mistake. Assumption of the risk, either expressed or implied e.g., as is clauses, Plaintiff knowing that he is ignorant of the true state of affairs. blind sales of items (safe, storage space auctions) Requirements for Unilateral Mistake Unilateral mistake: Only one of the parties is mistaken concerning a material term in the contract. It is possible for the mistaken party to avoid the contract: Prove the essential elements of mutual mistake; plus Nonmistaken party caused or knew of the mistake; or Would be unconscionable to enforce the contract. Unconscionable : unreasonably unfair to one party, marked by oppression, or otherwise unacceptably offensive to public policy 7

Duress Duress wrongful coercion that induces a person to enter or modify a contract. If duress is found, contract is voidable plaintiff may rescind the contract. But P may also enforce at her option Duress occurs when a person is forced to enter a contract through threats of physical, emotional, or economic harm. Requirements for Duress The contract was induced by an improper threat. Traditionally, a person would have to threaten to do something wrongful or illegal for the threat to constitute duress. Many courts now require that the threat must be an improper use of leverage to induce a contract whether the threatened action is legal or not. e.g., Husband divorcing wife threatens to sue for custody of children something he has right to do unless she transfers him stock that she owns in his company. The victim had no reasonable alternative but to enter the contract. Classical contract law required that the degree of coercion had to overcome the will of a person with ordinary courage. The more modern standard focuses whether the plaintiff had reasonable alternatives to entering the contract. e.g., Traveling salesman & repair shop, p. 245 Economic Duress Economic duress or business compulsion a person is induced to enter or modify a contract by a threat to his economic interests. e.g., Threatening to breach a contract the other party desperately needs if that party does not agree to modify terms or agree to another transaction. 8

Undue Influence Undue influence unfair persuasion of a susceptible individual. Undue influence involves wrongful pressure exerted through persuasion (compare: duress is through coercion). Determining Undue Influence There is a relationship of trust and confidence or dominance. The person being influenced justifiably believes that the other party is looking out for his interests. e.g., Parent-child, husband-wife, lawyer-client, or even old lady and her butler (Doris Duke case) The persuasion is unfair. Courts look at all of the surrounding facts and circumstances to determine whether unfair methods of persuasion were used. e.g., Was person rushed? Was contract discussed and entered into at unusual time and place? Was contract fair or lopsided? Reality of Consent End of Chapter 13 9