Joint Response Plan Rohingya Humanitarian Crisis March December 2018

Similar documents
Meeting in the Council for Development Policy 28 November 2017 Agenda item 10

a n n u a l r e p o r t

CONOPS. Cox s Bazar Refugee Crisis. Emergency Telecommunications Sector (ETS) Concept of Operation (ConOps) 26 October Background.

ETHIOPIA HUMANITARIAN FUND (EHF) SECOND ROUND STANDARD ALLOCATION- JULY 2017

WHEN THE RUBBER HITS THE ROAD

MYANMAR REFUGEE EMERGENCY RESPONSE IN BANGLADESH

CLIMATE CHANGE AND FORCED MIGRATION HOTSPOTS

Government Deployment of Talent Development Project Graduates to Rohingya Refugee Camps in Bangladesh

Evaluation Terms of Reference

866, ,000 71,000

SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGE AND NEEDS

Bangladesh. Persons of concern

IOM APPEAL DR CONGO HUMANITARIAN CRISIS 1 JANUARY DECEMBER 2018 I PUBLISHED ON 11 DECEMBER 2017

BANGLADESH 09 May 4 June 2018

October ,000 people in. 100 Rohingya households projects to upgrade Balukhali. benefit from cash for makeshift site. sites managed by IOM

UNICEF Humanitarian Situation Report (Rohingya Influx) August UNICEF and IPs (Refugees and Host Communities) Total Results (2018)

UNICEF Humanitarian Situation Report (Rohingya Influx) August UNICEF and IPs (Refugees and Host Communities) Total Results (2018)

Total Results* Target 11,876 27,570 7,500 15, , , , , , , , , , , , ,317

P R E S S Conference. a. Cox s Bazar CSO-NGO Forum

Madam Chair, Distinguished Delegates, Ladies and Gentlemen

Highlights. Situation Overview

CITIES IN CRISIS CONSULTATIONS - Gaziantep, Turkey

Honour the Promises: One year on from the Rohingya pledging conference. October 2018

Kenya. Main objectives. Working environment. Recent developments. Total requirements: USD 35,068,412

UNICEF Humanitarian Situation Report (Rohingya Influx) October UNICEF and IPs (Refugees and Host Communities) Total Results (2018)

Coordination of Humanitarian and Development Assistance in Jordan

BRAC s Humanitarian Response in Cox s Bazar

Advanced Preparedness Actions (APAs) for Refugee Emergencies

Total Results (2018) Target* 35,093 7,319 24,000 3, , ,448 1,052, , , , , , , ,370

P O S I T I O N Paper

ROHINGYA HUMANITARIAN CRISIS

IDPs 1 200, ,000. Tibetan refugees (settled) Mandate urban refugees/asylumseekers

UNICEF Bangladesh Humanitarian Situation Report, # February Total Results* Target 11,876 27,570 7,500 14, , ,299

ROHINGYA REFUGEE CRISIS Camp Settlement and Protection Profiling Cox s Bazar, Bangladesh Round 3

This action is funded by the European Union

BANGLADESH October 2018

UNICEF Humanitarian Situation Report (Rohingya Influx) February UNICEF and IPs (Refugees and Host Communities) Sector Total Results (2019)

Site Assessment: Round 8

The release of the full HIP amount is conditional on the payment of Member State contributions to the Facility for Refugees in Turkey in 2019.

ROHINGYA REFUGEE RESPONSE GENDER ANALYSIS

Host Community should be Heard During Humanitarian Intervention in FDMN/Rohingya Relief Operation

Background. Types of migration

Bangladesh Overview December 2018

CCCM Cluster Somalia Strategy

REVIEW OF THE COMMON CASH FACILITY APPROACH IN JORDAN HEIDI GILERT AND LOIS AUSTIN. The Cash Learning Partnership

Bangladesh. Highlights. 720,000 Children in need of humanitarian assistance. 1.2 million People in need (HRP )

Seeking opportunities to respond to the Rohingya Refugee Crisis in Bangladesh

Host Community should be heard during humanitarian intervention in FDMN/ Rohingya relief operation Introduction Objective of the study

The main areas where the EU helps Bangladesh are economic development, human rights, good governance and the environment.

The Rohingya Refugee Crisis and Building Capacity for Rapid and Predictable Humanitarian Response

UNDP s Response To The Crisis In Iraq

Enhanced protection of Syrian refugee women, girls and boys against Sexual Gender-Based Violence (SGBV) Enhanced basic public services and economic

THAILAND. Overview. Working environment. People of concern

Update on UNHCR s global programmes and partnerships

Global Camp Coordination and Camp Management (CCCM) Cluster

SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC. Overview. Working environment GLOBAL APPEAL 2015 UPDATE

Revision to the UNHCR Supplementary Budget: The Libya Situation 2011

CONGOLESE SITUATION RESPONDING TO THE NEEDS OF DISPLACED CONGOLESE AND REFUGEES

Afghanistan. Working environment. Total requirements: USD 54,347,491. The context

FIELD PARTNERSHIP SNAPSHOT: RWANDA

KENYA. The majority of the refugees and asylum-seekers in Kenya live in designated camps. Overcrowded

The Cluster Approach in NBC

Update on implementation of UNHCR s commitments under the grand bargain I. INTRODUCTION

BANGLADESH 1 15 August 2018

919, ,000 3,000

In partnership with. Dutch Relief Alliance: Working together to respond more effectively to humanitarian crises

Prepared by OCHA on behalf of the Humanitarian Country Team PRIORITY NEEDS. 1 Crisis-driven displacement. 2 Acute food insecurity

Social Impact Assessment of the Rohingya Refugee Crisis into Bangladesh Key Findings and Recommendations (6 th December 2017)

The Global Compact on Refugees UNDP s Written Submission to the First Draft GCR (9 March) Draft Working Document March 2018

The Global Strategic Priorities

150,000,000 9,300,000 6,500,000 4,100,000 4,300, ,000, Appeal Summary. Syria $68,137,610. Regional $81,828,836

Nutrition Sector Emergency Preparedness & Response, Cox s Bazar APRIL 2018

MALI. Overview. Working environment

Terms of Reference for the Humanitarian Coordinator (2003)

CHF Advisory Board. Meeting minutes, 17 February Opening Remarks

1.3 million people targeted for health assistance Total Rohingya in Bangladesh New arrivals since 25 Aug 2017

BANGLADESH September 2018

BURMA COMPLEX EMERGENCY

Survey Report on. Elephant Movement, Human-Elephant Conflict Situation, and Possible Intervention Sites in and around Kutupalong Camp, Cox s Bazar

NIGER. Overview. Working environment. People of concern

UGANDA. Overview. Working environment GLOBAL APPEAL 2015 UPDATE

Nepal. Main objectives. Working environment. Planning figures. Total requirements: USD 6,398,200. Recent developments

Situation Report: Rohingya Refugee Crisis

Leaving No One Behind: Education for girls and boys of Rohingya refugees and host communities in Cox s Bazar district of Bangladesh

UGANDA REFUGEE RESPONSE PLAN Livelihoods Sector Technical Working Group Response Plan

RWANDA. Overview. Working environment

PREPARING FOR DURABLE SOLUTIONS INSIDE SYRIA 2017

2018 Planning summary

Bangladesh Humanitarian Situation Report No. 2

Tanzania Humanitarian Situation Report

SOMALIA - COMPLEX EMERGENCY

Resilience and self-reliance from a protection and solutions perspective

Migration Consequences of Complex Crises: IOM Institutional and Operational Responses 1

POLICY BRIEF THE CHALLENGE DISASTER DISPLACEMENT AND DISASTER RISK REDUCTION ONE PERSON IS DISPLACED BY DISASTER EVERY SECOND

7. The Guidance Note on the Preparedness Package for Refugee Emergencies (PPRE)

Photo Credit: NIF / Moshood Raimi NIGERIA INGO FORUM

Humanitarian Bulletin Yemen

IOM R AUGUST 2 RESPONSE HORN OF AFRICA DROUGHT IOM REGIONAL RESPONSE

WFP Somalia SPECIAL OPERATION SO

BANGLADESH 21 February March 2018

Transcription:

Joint Response Plan Rohingya Humanitarian Crisis March December 2018 Joint Response Plan: March December 2018 Under the guidance of the Government of Bangladesh, the Rohingya Humanitarian Crisis Joint Response Plan was developed for March - December 2018. Together with the RRRC, the DC, and with line Ministries working alongside the Sectors, strategic planning took place from December 2017 February 2018. The plan was endorsed by the National Taskforce prior to its release on 16 March 2018. The plan is an appeal to the international donor community for funds for national NGOs, international NGOs, and UN agencies to assist in covering identified needs of refugees and host communities, in support of the Government of Bangladesh. It is not a guarantee of funding: it is a tool for fundraising. The plan is clearly prioritized, identifying activities that are critical to saving lives and maintaining social cohesion and protection. The Plan has two tracks: covering the needs of refugees, as well as the humanitarian needs of directly affected host communities. The Plan includes emergency preparedness and response, anticipating spikes of acute emergency within a protracted crisis. 1

Who developed the Joint Response Plan, and how? Under the guidance of the Government of Bangladesh, and based on needs assessments, the Plan was collaboratively developed by all participating INGOs, NNGOs, and UN agencies. A sector-based coordination structure is in place to facilitate the strategic and operational decision making and planning for the humanitarian response, from Dhaka to camp level, in support of the Government of Bangladesh. Government counterparts guide across the technical Sectors. National NGOs participate at all levels. The ISCG Secretariat supports this coordination structure, and through it all the operational actors in the response, in order to meet the protection and assistance needs of Rohingya and host communities. National NGOs in the coordination structure The Strategic Executive Group in Dhaka includes a national NGO seat, nominated by the national NGO community in Cox s Bazar. Currently, Coast Trust holds this seat. The Strategic Executive Group is Co-Chaired by the United Nations Resident Coordinator, the Chief of Mission of IOM, and the Representative of UNHCR. The Heads of Sub-Offices group in Cox s Bazar includes national NGO seats, and is currently regularly attended by BRAC and BDRCS. National NGOs currently Co-Chair: Shelter and Non-Food Items Sector is Co-Chaired by Caritas Bangladesh, with IOM, under the guidance of RRRC; Food Security Sector is Co-Chaired by Mukti, with WFP, under the guidance of RRRC; Communications with Communities Working Group is Co-Chaired by the CSO Forum, with IOM, under the guidance of RRRC. The ISCG Secretariat established an NGO Support Cell early in the influx, which supported local and international NGOs to participate in the coordination of the response by sharing information and raising concerns. Now, independent NGO coordination has strengthened: going forward, the ISCG Secretariat will liaise closely with and support both INGO and NNGO/CSO coordination forums. National NGOs regularly attend and actively participate as key partners in all sector meetings. Barriers to participation such as language, and awareness of the coordination structure, need to be actively addressed. Enhanced, meaningful participation and inclusion is a core goal, with a view to increasing localization of the response, in line with Grand Bargain commitments. Localization is a key principle of the Joint Response Plan. 2

Joint Response Plan Strategic Objectives People In Need and Requirements PEOPLE IN NEED 1.3 Million ESTIMATED REQUIREMENTS (US$) 950.8 Million Rohingya in Cox s Bazar. More than 900,000 refugees have been assessed as of 21 January. Numbers will be aligned and adjusted: the goal of a unified database for assistance delivery is key part of the plan. Directly impacted Bangladeshi host communities. 336,000 Bangladeshi host communities are targeted. Response under the JRP will focus on Unions with highest numbers of refugees in Ukhia and Teknaf, and on support to public services at District level. Contingency for cyclone/monsoon. The cyclone/monsoon season will affect both Rohingya and host communities. 3

Key Principles Protection and gender mainstreaming Accountability to affected populations Localization, including two-way capacity building Environmental sustainability Assistance based on humanitarian need 4

Localization Together with the Government of Bangladesh, we are working towards: A complete and coherent picture: together with the RRRC and DC, capturing the full scale and scope of national NGO contributions to the response, and linking national NGOs to the coordination mechanisms. Diversified partnerships with INGOs and UN agencies: ensuring strategic, inclusive partnerships, that recognize, foster and maximise local capacities. Two-way capacity building to pave the way to a localized response: building a capacity building strategy that facilitates meaningful exchange of knowledge and resources between international and national humanitarian actors, allowing for innovation, and paving the way to a localized response. To better understand the needs, constraints and opportunities of both national NGOs and Government counterparts a survey is currently underway. 39 national NGOs are included in the Joint Response Plan, as partners or with independent projects. Many more are active in the response. At least 31 national NGOs are currently in partnerships with INGOs and UN agencies. 13 national NGOs are currently reporting independent project implementation to the 4Ws. Many more have received FD7s for independent project implementation, and are liaising directly with the DC and RRRC. Priority Activities Priority activities are those which will: Address the highest risks that would trigger rising rates of mortality and morbidity. Disease outbreak; cyclone and monsoon impact. Address the highest risks to protection and social cohesion. Deterioration of refugees hosting conditions; increase of negative coping mechanisms and risks of exploitation. 5

Bangladeshi Host Communities Approximately one quarter of planned activities and requested funds will be targeted to Bangladeshi host communities directly impacted by the crisis. The objectives of supporting directly impacted Bangladeshi host communities will be: To mitigate the impacts of the refugee influx on host communities and the local economy. Strengthen resilience of host communities and government service delivery to cope with the influx. Mitigate tensions with host communities through social cohesion and programming to facilitate peaceful co-existence. Activities will focus on: Environment and eco-system rehabilitation Agriculture, markets and livelihoods support Community and public infrastructure (including water) Health and education Institutional support to core Government functions in the management of the crisis, according to need and request, will underpin efforts. Joint Response Plan: next steps Ongoing implementation, monitoring, and advocacy (for funds, and for course correction) Review and revision at the mid-point of the Plan, in July 2018 Needs assessment and strategic planning for 2019 6