A CITIZEN S GUIDE TO STRUCTURED SENTENCING

Similar documents
A CITIZEN S GUIDE TO STRUCTURED SENTENCING

MISDEMEANOR SENTENCING STEPS FOR SENTENCING A MISDEMEANOR UNDER STRUCTURED SENTENCING

Objectives. A very brief history 1/26/18. Jamie Markham. Grid fluency Handbook and form familiarity Avoid common errors

Glossary of Criminal Justice Sentencing Terms

Jurisdiction Profile: North Carolina

SENTENCING IN SUPERIOR COURT. Jamie Markham (919) STEPS FOR SENTENCING A FELONY UNDER STRUCTURED SENTENCING

Massachusetts Sentencing Commission Current Statutes Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 211E 1-4 (2018)

Jurisdiction Profile: Alabama

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2017 Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note

Structured Sentencing

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2017 Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2017 Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note

Sentencing Chronic Offenders

Euthanasia Methods Approved by the AVMA, AHA, and HSUS

ll1. THE SENTENCING COMMISSION

Assembly Bill No. 510 Select Committee on Corrections, Parole, and Probation

Criminal Justice A Brief Introduction

Determinate Sentencing: Time Served December 30, 2015

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2007 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 1003

HOUSE BILL 299 A BILL ENTITLED

County of Santa Clara Office of the District Attorney

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2017 Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note

The Simple Yet Confusing Matter of Sentencing (1 hour) Gary M. Gavenus Materials

State Court Processing of Domestic Violence Cases

Session Law Creating the New Mexico Sentencing Commission, 2003 New Mexico Laws ch. 75

MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2017

Felony Offenses Committed on or after October 1, 2013

Sentencing, Corrections, Prisons, and Jails

Jurisdiction Profile: Massachusetts

For the purposes of this article, the following terms have the following meanings:

MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2018

Session of HOUSE BILL No By Committee on Corrections and Juvenile Justice 1-18

Sentencing in Colorado

HOUSE BILL NO. HB0094. Sponsored by: Joint Judiciary Interim Committee A BILL. for. AN ACT relating to criminal justice; amending provisions

Title 17-A: MAINE CRIMINAL CODE

IN 2009, GOVERNOR BEVERLY PERDUE

ll1. THE SENTENCING COMMISSION

Virginia s Nonviolent Offender Risk Assessment

Jurisdiction Profile: Washington, D.C.

Jurisdiction Profile: Minnesota

ll1. THE SENTENCING COMMISSION

UNDERSTANDING AND USING PENNSYLVANIA SENTENCING DATA. Pennsylvania Commission on Sentencing. June 14, 2017

Criminal Justice in America CJ Chapter 12 James J. Drylie, Ph.D.

New Felony Defender Training: SENTENCING IN SUPERIOR COURT

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 81B 1

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...17 FORWARD...23

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 H 2 HOUSE BILL 369 Committee Substitute Favorable 4/11/17

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO HOUSE BILL 3078

Summit County Pre Trial Services

CAUSE NUMBER 00 THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE COUNTY CRIMINAL V. COURT AT LAW NUMBER 00 DEFENDANT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

Diverting Low-Risk Offenders From Florida Prisons A Presentation to the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Criminal and Civil Justice

Assembly Bill No. 25 Committee on Corrections, Parole, and Probation

Conditions of probation; evaluation and treatment; fees; effect of failure to abide by conditions; modification.

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL INTRODUCED BY GREENLEAF, LEACH, HUGHES, SCHWANK, YUDICHAK, BROWNE AND STREET, MARCH 12, 2018 AN ACT

House Bill 3078 Ordered by the House June 2 Including House Amendments dated June 2

Special Topic Seminar for District Court Judges February 2012 JUSTICE REINVESTMENT EXERCISES. Answers and Explanations

Overview of Current Sentencing Laws and Data Presentation to the Task Force on Sentencing Reforms for Opioid Drug Convictions.

ll1. THE SENTENCING COMMISSION

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 49

House Bill 3078 Ordered by the House June 30 Including House Amendments dated June 2 and June 30

PART C IMPRISONMENT. If the applicable guideline range is in Zone B of the Sentencing Table, the minimum term may be satisfied by

2014 Kansas Statutes

Introduction to Sentencing and Corrections

Supreme Court of Florida

REDUCING RECIDIVISM STATES DELIVER RESULTS

Office Of The District Attorney

5. NAME (LAST, FIRST, MI.I.) 6. DOB 8. RACE 10. PRIMARY OFF. DATE 12. PLEA FELONY F.S.# DESCRIPTION OFFENSE POINTS

REVISOR XX/BR

JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE (42 PA.C.S.) AND LAW AND JUSTICE (44 PA.C.S.) - OMNIBUS AMENDMENTS 25, 2008, P.L.

The Justice System Judicial Branch, Adult Corrections, and Youth Corrections

AN ACT. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Ohio:

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 82 1

State Issue 1 The Neighborhood Safety, Drug Treatment, and Rehabilitation Amendment

Colorado Legislative Council Staff

Assault and the Criminal Justice System. Alaska Criminal Justice Commission, presentation to ASHNHA

Sentencing hearing after conviction for impaired driving; determination of grossly aggravating and aggravating and mitigating factors;

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 85 1

PRESENT: Lemons, C.J., Goodwyn, Mims, Powell, Kelsey, and McCullough, JJ., and Millette, S.J.

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 228

The True Cost of Justice in Marion County

Summit on Effective Responses to Violations of Probation and Parole

42 Pa.C.S. 9729, 9763, 9773 and Chapter 98.

DESCHUTES COUNTY ADULT JAIL L. Shane Nelson, Sheriff Jail Operations Approved by: March 10, 2016 TIME COMPUTATION

Sentencing and the Correctional System. Chapter 11

AN ACT RELATING TO DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF INTOXICATING LIQUOR OR DRUGS; INCREASING THE PENALTY FOR HOMICIDE BY

Jurisdiction Profile: Arkansas

Kansas Legislator Briefing Book 2014

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 820 NORTH FRENCH STREET WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19801

Louisiana Data Analysis Part 1: Prison Trends. Justice Reinvestment Task Force August 11, 2016

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 HOUSE BILL 494 RATIFIED BILL

SENATE BILL NO. 34 IN THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE - FIRST SESSION A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED

Louisiana Justice Reinvestment Package

SUBCHAPTER F PENNSYLVANIA COMMISSION ON SENTENCING

2/21/2011 AMERICAN CORRECTIONS 9 TH EDITION. Three elements:

NORTH CAROLINA SENTENCING AND POLICY ADVISORY COMMISSION REPORT #2 ON PROPOSED LEGISLATION PURSUANT TO G.S

Information Memorandum 98-11*

IC Chapter 6. Release From Imprisonment and Credit Time

APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS FOR:

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 46 1

Session Law Creating the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines Commission and Abolishing Parole, 1978 Minn. Laws ch. 723

Transcription:

A CITIZEN S GUIDE TO STRUCTURED SENTENCING (Revised 2010) PREPARED BY: THE NORTH CAROLINA SENTENCING AND POLICY ADVISORY COMMISSION P.O. Box 2472 Raleigh, N.C. 27602 phone 919-890-1470 fax 919-890-1933 www.nccourts.org/courts/crs/councils/spac/ The Honorable W. Erwin Spainhour Chairman Susan Katzenelson Executive Director

STRUCTURED SENTENCING In 1990, the General Assembly created the North Carolina Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission to make recommendations to restore rationality, order and truth to the criminal justice system. In 1993, the General Assembly reviewed, amended and adopted the Commission s recommendations. The law was called Structured Sentencing and applies to all felony and misdemeanor crimes (except Driving While Impaired and Drug Trafficking) committed on or after October 1, 1994. Subsequent changes to the law were made during the 1995 and 2009 legislative sessions. The 2009 changes apply to crimes committed on or after December 1, 2009. Structured Sentencing is based on the following principles: Sentencing policies should be rational: The sentence should be proportional to the severity of the crime as measured by the harm to the victim and to the offender s prior record. Sentencing policies should be truthful: The time actually served in prison or jail should bear a close and consistent relationship to the sentence imposed by the judge. Early parole release should be abolished. Sentencing policies should be consistent: Offenders convicted of similar offenses, who have similar prior records, should generally receive similar sentences. Sentencing policies should set resource priorities: Sentencing policies should be supported by adequate prison, jail and community-based resources. The use of prisons and jails should be prioritized first for violent and repeat offenders and community-based programs should be first utilized for nonviolent offenders with little or no prior record. WHAT IS STRUCTURED SENTENCING? Structured Sentencing is the method of sentencing and punishing criminals in North Carolina. It classifies offenders on the basis of the severity of their crime and on the extent and gravity of their prior criminal record. Based on these two factors, structured sentencing provides judges with sentencing options for the type and length of sentences which may be imposed. WHY WAS STRUCTURED SENTENCING ENACTED? Structured Sentencing is designed to help the State maintain control over the criminal justice system and to provide credibility to sentencing. Under the law, there is no early parole release so the sentence is truthful. In addition, the law sets priorities for the use of correctional resources and balances sentencing policies with correctional capacity.

HOW ARE CRIMES CLASSIFIED? Felony crimes are classified into letter classes (from Offense Class A through Class I) depending on their seriousness. Crimes which involve victim injury or the risk of victim injury are assigned to the highest classes. Property crimes and other crimes which do not normally involve the risk of victim injury are assigned to lower classes. Misdemeanor crimes are classified into four classes (Class A1, Class 1, Class 2 and Class 3). The most serious misdemeanor crimes are in Class A1 and the least serious are in Class 3. HOW ARE OFFENDERS CLASSIFIED? Felons are classified into one of six prior record levels (from Prior Record Level I through Level VI) depending on the extent and gravity of their prior record. Felons with violent or extensive prior convictions are assigned to the highest level, while those with minor or no prior convictions are assigned to the lowest level. Misdemeanor offenders are classified into one of three prior conviction levels depending on their number of prior convictions. HOW IS THE TYPE OF SENTENCE DETERMINED? Under Structured Sentencing, there are three types of punishment: active (prison or jail), intermediate and community. Judges must impose active punishments for felons convicted of crimes which fall in high offense classes or for felons who have high prior record levels. Judges must impose intermediate or community punishments for felons who are convicted of crimes which fall in the lowest offense classes and who also have low prior record levels. For offenders who fall somewhere in between, the judge may elect to impose either an active punishment or an intermediate punishment. Regardless of the offender s prior record, the judge may impose either an active, intermediate or community punishment for offenders convicted of Class A1 misdemeanors. For offenders convicted of Class 1, 2 or 3 misdemeanors and with no prior convictions, the judge must impose a community punishment. For most other misdemeanants, the judge may impose either an active, intermediate or community punishment. WHAT IS AN ACTIVE PUNISHMENT? An active prison sentence requires that felons be incarcerated in the state prison system. Misdemeanants with sentences over 90 days are incarcerated in the state prison system and those with sentences 90 days or less are incarcerated in county jails. WHAT IS AN INTERMEDIATE PUNISHMENT? An intermediate punishment requires that the offender be placed on supervised probation with one or more of the following special conditions: split sentence (a term in prison or jail followed by supervised probation), house arrest with electronic monitoring (confinement to one location and close monitoring through computer technology), intensive supervision (very close

supervision and daily monitoring), a residential center (a highly supervised and structured program requiring overnight residence), a day reporting center (a highly supervised and structured day and evening program) and drug treatment court (a judicially monitored treatment program). Intermediate punishments are more restrictive and controlling than basic probation but less costly than prison. Generally, offenders must follow strict rules, work, pay restitution, and participate in drug or other types of treatment. WHAT IS A COMMUNITY PUNISHMENT? A community punishment is any type of sentence which does not involve prison, jail or an intermediate punishment. Most people think of this as basic probation. A community punishment may also include fines, restitution, community service and/or substance abuse treatment. HOW IS THE LENGTH OF THE ACTIVE TERM DETERMINED UNDER STRUCTURED SENTENCING? For felony convictions under Structured Sentencing, judges impose both a minimum and a maximum prison term. The length of the minimum and maximum term depends on the offense class, the prior record level, and the presence of any aggravating or mitigating factors. For each combination of felony offense class and prior record level, three sentence ranges are prescribed: a presumptive range for typical cases, an aggravated range for cases where aggravation is found, and a mitigated range for cases where mitigation is found. The judge selects a minimum prison term from one of these three ranges. Once the minimum term is set, a maximum term is dictated by statute (at least 20% longer than the minimum). For each combination of misdemeanor offense class and prior conviction level, there is one sentence range. The judge selects a single active term from the appropriate range. HOW MUCH OF THE PRISON TERM MUST BE SERVED? Under Structured Sentencing, good time, gain time and parole are eliminated. Felons sentenced to prison must serve 100% of their minimum term and may serve up to their maximum term if they misbehave, fail to work or refuse to participate in programs. Upon release, felony offenders convicted of more serious felony offenses must be placed on post-release supervision. Misdemeanants must serve the full active term unless the Sheriff elects to award earned time of up to four days a month for specific activities while the offender is in jail. WHAT IS POST-RELEASE SUPERVISION? Post-release supervision is a mandatory term of supervision after release from prison for felony Class B1 through E offenses. The offender's behavior is monitored in the community, and supervision is provided to help the offender reintegrate into society. The offender may be returned to prison and serve additional time for violating the post-release conditions.

HOW DOES POST-RELEASE SUPERVISION DIFFER FROM PAROLE? Unlike parole, the offender is not released from prison early. Post-release supervision begins after the offender has served at least his minimum prison sentence and is released. Like parole supervision, post-release supervision requires the offender to be supervised and monitored in the community. HAS THE LIKELIHOOD OF IMPRISONMENT CHANGED UNDER STRUCTURED SENTENCING? Under Structured Sentencing, imprisonment is mandatory for all felony offenders who are convicted of crimes in high offense classes and/or have high prior record levels. Compared to the past, the probability of going to prison is higher for these violent and/or career criminals. Conversely, offenders convicted of crimes in low offense classes and who also have low prior record levels are less likely to go to prison than they did in the past. HAS THE AMOUNT OF TIME SERVED IN PRISON CHANGED UNDER STRUCTURED SENTENCING? In most cases, the prison sentence pronounced by the judge sounds shorter than under the old law, but the actual time served is longer. Under the old law, the sentence imposed by the judge was reduced by good time, gain time and parole. Under Structured Sentencing, these early release mechanisms have been eliminated. Compared to the past, the average actual time served in prison is greater for most offenders, especially for violent and career felons. HOW HAS STRUCTURED SENTENCING AFFECTED PRISON AND JAIL POPULATIONS? The Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission uses data on convictions and sentences imposed to estimate the prison population. Prison population projections are prepared on an annual basis using a computer simulation model. The General Assembly has authorized the construction of new prisons as the projections have demonstrated the need. Information regarding jail populations is locally maintained, and no statewide-automated information is available. The jail populations depend on local pretrial and sentencing practices. HOW ARE COMMUNITY PUNISHMENTS IMPOSED UNDER STRUCTURED SENTENCING? The active term is suspended if an offender is sentenced to an intermediate or community punishment. However, if these offenders fail to obey conditions required as part of their punishment, the conditions may be increased, the offender may be held in contempt of court and be incarcerated for up to 30 days in jail, or the judge may activate the suspended sentence. If the prison terms are activated, felony offenders must serve 100% of the minimum term and may serve up to the maximum term; misdemeanor offenders must serve the entire jail sentence unless

the sheriff awards earned time credits. Offenders know that if they fail to abide by the conditions of their non-prison punishments, they face certain imprisonment. HOW DOES STRUCTURED SENTENCING AFFECT PUNISHMENTS IN THE COMMUNITY? Structured Sentencing allows less serious and less chronic offenders to remain in the community. These offenders often require supervision and treatment services that are provided in their local communities. The State-County Criminal Justice Partnership Act provides counties with financial grants to develop community corrections programs tailored to local needs. PUNISHMENT CHARTS To determine the punishment options for each offender, the judge refers to either the felony or misdemeanor punishment chart shown on the following pages. Felony Punishment Chart Offense Class. Along the left side of the chart are letters from A through I representing the severity of the crime. Class A includes the most serious felonies while Class I includes the least serious felonies. Prior Record Level. Along the top of the chart are six Roman numerals from I to VI representing the extent and gravity of the offender's prior record. An offender with little or no prior record falls into Level I; an offender with a very violent or extensive prior record falls into Level VI. Type of Sentence. For each combination of Offense Class and Prior Record Level, one or more letters are indicated. An "A" stands for an active prison term, an "I" stands for an intermediate punishment, and a "C" stands for a community punishment. If more than one letter is shown, the judge may choose the type of punishment. Length of Sentence. For each combination of Offense Class and Prior Record Level, three sentence ranges are provided. The judge selects a single sentence term from one of the three ranges which establishes the minimum number of months that an offender must serve. The judge also imposes a maximum term which is approximately 20% longer than the minimum term. Misdemeanor Punishment Chart A similar chart is used for misdemeanors. However, instead of ten felony classes, there are four misdemeanor classes (A1, 1, 2, and 3); instead of six prior record levels there are three prior conviction levels (I, II, and III); and instead of three sentence ranges, there is only one. The judge selects a single term from the sentence range which specifies the number of days the offender must serve. Like the felony punishment chart, an A stands for an active prison term, an "I" stands for an intermediate punishment, and a "C" stands for a community punishment. If more than one letter is shown, the judge may choose the type of punishment.

*** Effective for Offenses Committed on or after 12/1/09 *** OFFENSE CLASS A B1 B2 C D E F G H I I 0-1 Pt FELONY PUNISHMENT CHART PRIOR RECORD LEVEL II 2-5 Pts III 6-9 Pts IV 10-13 Pts Death or Life Without Parole V 14-17 Pts VI 18+ Pts A A A A A A DISPOSITION 240-300 276-345 317-397 365-456 Life Without Life Without Parole Parole Aggravated Range 192-240 221-276 254-317 292-365 336-420 386-483 PRESUMPTIVE RANGE 144-192 166-221 190-254 219-292 252-336 290-386 Mitigated Range A A A A A A 157-196 180-225 207-258 238-297 273-342 314-393 125-157 144-180 165-207 190-238 219-273 251-314 94-125 108-144 124-165 143-190 164-219 189-251 A A A A A A 73 92 83-104 96-120 110-138 127-159 146-182 58-73 67-83 77-96 88-110 101-127 117-146 44-58 50-67 58-77 66-88 76-101 87-117 A A A A A A 64-80 73-92 84-105 97-121 111-139 128-160 51-64 59-73 67-84 78-97 89-111 103-128 38-51 44-59 51-67 58-78 67-89 77-103 I/A I/A A A A A 25-31 29-36 33-41 38-48 44-55 50-63 20-25 23-29 26-33 30-38 35-44 40-50 15-20 17-23 20-26 23-30 26-35 30-40 I/A I/A I/A A A A 16-20 19-23 21-27 25-31 28-36 33-41 13-16 15-19 17-21 20-25 23-28 26-33 10-13 11-15 13-17 15-20 17-23 20-26 I/A I/A I/A I/A A A 13-16 14-18 17-21 19-24 22-27 25-31 10-13 12-14 13-17 15-19 17-22 20-25 8-10 9-12 10-13 11-15 13-17 15-20 I/A I/A I/A I/A A 6-8 8-10 10-12 11-14 15-19 20-25 5-6 6-8 8-10 9-11 12-15 16-20 4-5 4-6 6-8 7-9 9-12 12-16 C C/I I I/A I/A I/A 6-8 6-8 6-8 8-10 9-11 10-12 4-6 4-6 5-6 6-8 7-9 8-10 3-4 3-4 4-5 4-6 5-7 6-8 A Active Punishment I Intermediate Punishment C Community Punishment Numbers shown are in months and represent the range of minimum sentences Revised: 08-31-09

***Effective for Offenses Committed on or after 12/1/95*** MISDEMEANOR PUNISHMENT CHART PRIOR CONVICTION LEVEL CLASS I II III No Prior Convictions One to Four Prior Convictions Five or More Prior Convictions A1 1-60 days 1-75 days 1-150 days 1 C 1-45 days 1-45 days 1-120 days 2 C 1-30 days C/I 1-45 days 1-60 days 3 C 1-10 days C/I 1-15 days 1-20 days A Active Punishment I Intermediate Punishment C Community Punishment Cells with slash allow either disposition at the discretion of the judge

STRUCTURED SENTENCING STATISTICAL PROFILE Felony Convictions FISCAL YEAR 2008/09 In FY 2008/09, sentences for 32,266 felony convictions were imposed. Property offenses (36%) and non-trafficking drug crimes (32%) were the most common types of conviction. Eighteen percent of convictions were for person crimes while the remaining 14% involved other crimes. The majority (66%) of felony convictions fell in Offense Classes H and I which include the least serious offenses under Structured Sentencing (See Figure 1). 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Figure 1: Convictions by Offense Class FY 2008/09 Felonies 12% 8% 14% 41% 25% A-E F G H I Source: NC Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission, FY 2008/09 Felony Statistical Report Data

As shown in Figure 2, over half (57%) of felony convictions fell in Prior Record Levels I and II (i.e., involved offenders with little or no prior record). Figure 2: Convictions by Prior Record Level FY 2008/09 Felonies 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 34% 24% 19% 15% 4% 4% I II III IV V VI Source: NC Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission, FY 2008/09 Felony Statistical Report Data Of sentences imposed, 39% were for Active, 45% for Intermediate and 16% for Community punishments (See Figure 3). Figure 3: Punishment Imposed FY 2008/09 Felonies Active 39% Intermediate 45% Community 16% Source: NC Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission, FY 2008/09 Felony Statistical Report Data

Under Structured Sentencing, the average felon serves 100% of the minimum Active sentence imposed. The average minimum sentence for all felony convictions resulting in an Active punishment was 32 months in FY 2008/09. As shown in Figure 4, the average minimum sentence imposed increased as the offense class increased from the least serious to the most serious offense class. 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Figure 4: Active Sentence Imposed for Felons by Offense Class (Average Minimum Sentence in Months) 241 167 93 66 29 B1 B2 C D E F G H I 19 15 10 7 Note: Offense Class A convictions are subject to mandatory life or death sentences. Source: NC Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission, FY 2008/09 Felony Statistical Report Data Misdemeanor Convictions In FY 2008/09, sentences for 158,482 misdemeanor convictions were imposed. The largest proportion of convictions involved public order offenses (48%) while misdemeanor person offenses accounted for the smallest proportion (10%). Drug (17%) and property (25%) convictions comprised the rest of the crimes. An Active punishment was imposed for 24% of misdemeanor convictions, an Intermediate punishment was imposed for 2% of misdemeanor convictions and a Community punishment was imposed for 74% of misdemeanor convictions. The average sentence imposed for all misdemeanor convictions resulting in an Active punishment was 36 days in FY 2008/09. Active sentences of 90 days or less are served in local jail facilities. Of the Active sentences imposed, 89% were for sentences of 90 days or less.

Prison Population Projections Figure 5 shows the projected prison population and capacity over time. The projections take into account the decline of the resident prison population and the buildup of the new inmate population. Based on current projections, the prison population is expected to exceed 50,829 by 2019. 50,000 45,000 40,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 FIGURE 5 NC PRISON POPULATION AND CAPACITY UPDATED JANUARY 2010 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 Population Capacity Note: Prison capacity figures reflect Expanded Operating Capacity. Source: NC Sentencing Policy Advisory Commission and NC Department of Correction Note: The felony data for the statistical profile reflects sentences imposed under the preceding Felony Punishment Chart (for offenses committed before December 1, 2009). For a copy of this chart, go to http://www.nccourts.org/courts/crs/councils/spac/documents/felonychart_12_01_95maxchart. pdf. For more information, contact the North Carolina Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission at www.nccourts.org or 919-890-1470.