Spain 2 vs France 4. -A murder case-

Similar documents
A Guide to The European Arrest Warrant October 2012

Case Law by the Court of Justice of the European Union on the European Arrest Warrant

Case Law by the Court of Justice of the EU on the European Arrest Warrant

dr Tomasz Ostropolski Head of Unit, European Criminal Law Ministry of Justice, Poland BRUXELLES, 12 JUNE 2013

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 18 July 2007 *

A comparative analysis of the implementation of Article 4 (6) Framework Decision 2002/584 Resocialization above surrender?

Seminar 4: Collecting evidence throughout the European Union II: The European Evidence Warrant and New Instruments in this Field

The Principle of Ne Bis in Idem in Criminal Matters in the Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union

The European arrest warrant in the case law of the Court of Justice

Part II Application of mutual recognition to the transfer of judgments of conviction in the context of EU law

11500/14 GS/mvk 1 DG D 2B

EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT (EAW)

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. Accompanying document to

European legal instruments against corruption Czech experience. Miroslav Špecián Municipal Prosecution Office Prague Economic Crime Department

Prisoner Transfer, Material Detention Conditions & Sentence Execution In The European Union A Journey Bound For Choppy Waters?

General Secretariat delegations Report on Eurojust's casework in the field on the European Arrest Warrant

Prisoner transfer in the EU with the aim of enhancing social rehabilitation prospects.

Seminar 2: The pre-lisbon instruments: Special focus on the European Arrest Warrant

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT

Statewatch briefing on the European Evidence Warrant to the European Parliament

Report on Eurojust s casework in the field of the European Arrest Warrant

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT

Scope of the obligation to provide extradition

8414/1/14 REV 1 GS/mvk 1 DG D 2B

III ACTS ADOPTED UNDER TITLE VI OF THE EU TREATY

JUSTICE. The European Arrest Warrant. Jodie Blackstock Senior Legal Officer (EU: Justice and Home Affairs)

EXECUTION OF EAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS

Reports of Cases. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 19 September 2018 *

The Implementation of the European Arrest Warrant: Comparative Research

Seminar 4: Collecting evidence throughout the European Union II: The European Evidence Warrant and New Instruments in this Field

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels 2 September /11 CRIMORG 124 COPEN 200 EJN 100 EUROJUST 122

7222/16 SC/mvk 1 DG D 2B

Korea-Philippines Extradition Treaty

P.R. China-Korea Extradition Treaty

Proposal for a Council Framework Decision on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between the Member States (2001/C 332 E/18)

Pre-trial detention, custodial sentences, supervision of probation measures and alternative sanctions

COUNCIL FRAMEWORK DECISION of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (2002/584/JHA)

Proposed Framework Decision on European arrest warrants

Brussels, 13 December 2007 COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION 16494/07. Interinstitutional File: 2006/0158 (CNS) COPEN 181 NOTE

The European Parliament has delivered its opinion on the proposal on 14 June 2006.

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 14 January /08 COPEN 4

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 1 March /05 ADD 1 LIMITE COPEN 42

Ne bis in idem. From obstacle to extradition to fundamental right not to be prosecuted twice within the EU

Material detention conditions, execution of custodial sentences and prisoner transfer in the EU

REPORT. On the operation of the European Arrest Warrant Act (as amended) in the year 2015 made to the Houses of the

The European Arrest Warrant: Part of the Anti-terrorism Emergency Package?

UK Central Authority International Criminality Unit Home Office 2nd Floor Peel Building 2 Marsham Street London SW1P 4DF

The EEW from the perspective of the defence

The following is an outline of the presentation but note that the speaker adlibbed. Outline - The EU Directive on Access to a Lawyer (Measure C1/D)

The Europeanisation of Extradition: How Many Light Years Away to Mutual Confidence?

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 12 November /07 COPEN 146 EJN 32 EUROJUST 60

Pre-trial detention, custodial sentences, supervision of probation measures and alternative sanctions

Korea, Republic of (South Korea) International Extradition Treaty with the United States

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

MUTUAL RECOGNITION AND THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT

EXTRADITION TREATY BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HASHEMITE KINGDOM OF JORDAN

(Non) Ne bis in idem. European Jurisdictional Conflicts Transfer of Proceedings

EU update (including the Green Paper on the Presumption of Innocence) ECBA Conference, Edinburgh April 2006

MARIA DIANA IONESCU Faculty of Law, University Babeş-Bolyai Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Measures for pre-trial detention, custodial sentences, supervision of probation measures and alternative sanctions

5859/3/15 REV 3 SC/mvk 1 DG D 2B

THE SUPREME COURT THE MINISTER FOR JUSTICE EQUALITY AND LAW REFORM AND JOHN RENNER-DILLON

EUROPEAN COMMITTEE ON CRIME PROBLEMS (CDPC) COMMITTEE OF EXPERTS ON THE OPERATION OF EUROPEAN CONVENTIONS ON CO-OPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS (PC-OC)

14032/11 GS/np 1 DG H 2B

The European Arrest Warrant (EAW) and its Implementation in the Member States of the European Union

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 9 September /2/11 REV 2 COPEN 83 EJN 46 EUROJUST 58

Combatting Transnational Organized Crime through EXTRADITION

Some remarks regarding the Draft Council Framework Decision on the enforcement of decisions rendered in absentia 1

15206/17 SC/mvk 1 DG D 2B

13515/16 SC/mvk 1 DG D 2B

Extradition and the European Arrest Warrant: UK Practice and the Challenges

The European Arrest Warrant: Latvian Experience of Application

Austria International Extradition Treaty with the United States. Message from the President of the United States

Lund University Faculty of Law. From the SelectedWorks of Christoffer Wong. Christoffer Wong. February 8, 2011

THE IMPACT OF THE NEW LEGAL AID REGIME ON CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN BULGARIA. SVETLA IVANOVA AND VLADIMIR NIKOLOV ERA, CRACOW, 2-3 March 2017

ROLE OF NATIONALITY AND RESIDENCE IN EU JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS

Seminar 2: The pre-lisbon instruments: Special focus on the European Arrest Warrant

SOUTHERN AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY PROTOCOL ON EXTRADITION TABLE OF CONTENTS:

COMPARISON OF THE TRANSFER OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDING WITH OTHER FORMS OF INTERNATIONAL LEGAL COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS Ralitsa VOYNOVA

EXTRADITION ACT Act 7 of 2017 NOT IN OPERATION ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES

EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT AND SURRENDER PROCEDURES BETWEEN MEMBER STATES ACT (ZENPP) I. INTRODUCTORY PROVISIONS. Article 1

Italy International Extradition Treaty with the United States

The European Arrest Warrant Briefing and Suggested Amendments

Delegations will find the text of this Resolution in annex II and are invited to present their comments at the COPEN meeting of 28 May 2014.

FACT SHEET. Juveniles (children aged 16 or under):

MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 16 July 2015 *

LIMITE EN. Brussels, 3 June 2008 COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION /08 Interinstitutional File: 2008/0803 (CNS) LIMITE COPEN 111

THE PROBLEM WITH IMPLEMENTATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE EXECUTION OF EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT

St. Kitts and Nevis International Extradition Treaty with the United States

Legal Aid in the EU: main features of Directive 2016/1919/EU

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT. Session document

Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

The provisions in this Treaty follow generally the form and content of extradition treaties recently concluded by the United States.

Official Gazette of the Kingdom of the Netherlands

The European Arrest Warrant: One step closer to reform?

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. Tables "State of play" and "Declarations" Accompanying the document

EXTRADITION TREATY BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF LATVIA, SIGNED ON DECEMBER 7, 2005, AT RIGA.

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 2 May /12 COPEN 97 EJN 32 EUROJUST 39

Case 0303/05. Advocaten voor de Wereld VZW v Leden van de Ministerraad

Transcription:

Spain 2 vs France 4 -A murder case-

WHY TO EXECUTE 1. Reasons relating to the OBJECTIVES OF FD 2002/584/JHA on the European Arrest Warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States; 2. Reasons regarding the ABSENCE IN OUR CASE OF GROUNDS FOR NON-EXECUTION; 3. Reasons regarding the POSSIBILITY OF CONDITIONING THE SURRENDER 4. Reasons regarding the purpose of THE VICTIM S PROTECTION.

To a new way of cooperation Treaty of Amsterdam Tampere European Council FD 2002/584 EAW

Execution does not depend on the executing MS legal system Van Esbroeck Leyman and Pustarov Gasparini Joao Da Silva Bourquain Wolzenburg Kozlowski

MANDATORY GROUNDS (ARTICLE 3 FD) Article 3.1: If the offence on which the arrest warrant is based is covered by amnesty in the executing Member State, where that State had jurisdiction to prosecute the offence under its own criminal law; Article 3.2: If the executing judicial authority is informed that the requested person has been finally judged by a Member State in respect of the same acts provided that, where there has been sentence, the sentence has been served or is currently being served or may no longer be executed under the law of the sentencing Member State; Article 3.3: if the person who is the subject of the European arrest warrant may not, owing to his age, be held criminally responsible for the acts on which the arrest warrant is based under the law of the executing State.

NON-MANDATORY GROUNDS (ARTICLE 4 FD) Article 4.1: If, in one of the cases referred to in Article 2(4), the act on which the European arrest warrant is based does not constitute an offence under the law of the executing Member State; Article 4.2: Where the person who is the subject of the European arrest warrant is being prosecuted in the executing Member State for the same act as that on which the European arrest warrant is based; Article 4.3: Where the judicial authorities of the executing Member State have decided either not to prosecute for the offence on which the European arrest warrant is based or to halt proceedings, or where a final judgment has been passed upon the requested person in a Member State, in respect of the same acts, which prevents further proceedings;

NON-MANDATORY GROUNDS (ARTICLE 4 FD) Article 4.4: Where the criminal prosecution or punishment of the requested person is statute-barred according to the law of the executing Member State and the acts fall within the jurisdiction of that Member State under its own criminal law; Article 4.5: If the executing judicial authority is informed that the requested person has been finally judged by a third State in respect of the same acts provided that, where there has been sentence, the sentence has been served or is currently being served or may no longer be executed under the law of the sentencing country; Article 4.6 : If the European arrest warrant has been issued for the purposes of execution of a custodial sentence or detention order, where the requested person is staying in, or is a national or a resident of the executing Member State and that State undertakes to execute the sentence or detention order in accordance with its domestic law;

NON-MANDATORY GROUNDS (ARTICLE 4 FD) Article 4.7: Where the European arrest warrant relates to offences which: (a) are regarded by the law of the executing Member State as having been committed in whole or in part in the territory of the executing Member State or in a place treated as such; or (b) have been committed outside the territory of the issuing Member State and the law of the executing Member State does not allow prosecution for the same offences when committed outside its territory. Article 4 bis) refers exclusively to judgments in absentia and is therefore not applicable

CONDITIONING SURRENDER (art. 5.3 FD) 1. Rather than denying surrender: Conduct prosecution in State B Serve custodial sentence in State A 2. Aim: increasing the requested person s chances of reintegrating into society 3. A real balance is striked between: The aims of prosecution X s social reintegration

VICTIM S PROTECTION FD 15 March 2001 on the Standing of victims in criminal proceedings Council of Europe Recommendation 2006 1985 UN Declaration on Basic Principles of Justice for victims of Crime and Abuse of Power. 15 March 2001 FD: Article 2 FD: enhances the importance of giving the victims a real and appropriate role in the criminal legal system. Article 3 FD: right to be heard during proceedings and to supply evidence. Prosecuting crimes in State B: positive

CONCLUSIONS

Mutual recognition: ECJ Case Leymann and Pustovarov Exclusion of the dual criminality test: Article 2.2 FD None of the non-execution grounds is applicable: Articles 3 and 4 FD. Location of evidence Possibility to condition the surrender: article 5.3 FD Protection of victims

X HAS TO BE SURRENDERED